Comparison of surgical bypass and percutaneous balloon dilatation with primary stent placement in the treatment of central venous obstruction in the dialysis patient: one-year follow-up

Management of upper extremity central venous obstruction using interventional radiology

Upper extremity central vein stenosis/occlusion is responsible for significant morbidity. The objective of this report is to review our management using interventional radiological techniques and to determine the long-term clinical results. All radiological interventions for central vein stenosis/occlusion (n = 59) between July 1991 and July 1996 at our institution were reviewed. The interventions consisted of thrombolytic therapy alone in 10 cases, PTA in 40 cases (combined with initial thrombolytic therapy in 6 cases), and deployment of a venous stent in 9 cases. At follow-up, the cumulative success (patency and relief of symptoms) was determined (Kaplan-Meier method). The involved vein was the subclavian, axillary, or innominate (SUB-AX-INN) in 45 cases and the superior vena cava (SVC) in 14 cases. The etiology was secondary to an indwelling foreign body (catheter, pacemaker lead) in 53 cases (90%), and spontaneous in only 6 cases (10%). The average follow-up after intervention was 17.2 months, with a cumulative success of 70 +/- 7.5% at 2 years, with rapid decline thereafter. Analysis of the failure quantiles revealed that 25% failed by 17 months, 50% failed by 26.6 months, and 75% failed by 33.8 months. There were no subgroup differences (log-rank test) for stenosis versus occlusion (p = 0.526), SUB-AX-INN versus SVC (p = 0.744), or if the intervention was begun < 5 days versus > or =5 days after symptom onset (p = 0.240), or whether or not a stent was deployed (p = 0.893). Interventional radiological techniques should be considered when symptoms from upper extremity central vein stenosis/occlusion are severe and disabling, or when veno-access or maintenance of patency of an ipsilateral arteriovenous (A-V) access is necessary. These results suggest an acceptable short-to medium-term solution.

Venous reconstructions using the superficial femoral-popliteal vein

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the feasibility of venous reconstructions with the superficial femoral-popliteal vein (SFPV).

METHODS

Seven patients who underwent a variety of major venous reconstructions using SFPV were reviewed in a retrospective, observational study.

RESULTS

Three central venous reconstructions (thoracic and abdominal) and four peripheral major venous reconstructions were performed with SFPV autografts. In all patients, the SFPV grafts provided an excellent size match and were of adequate length without the need for enlargement by paneling or spiraling techniques. Postoperative anticoagulation medication was not used. There were no early graft failures, and patency was documented by duplex ultrasound, venogram, or both in all patients at a mean of 20 months follow-up. Venous thromboembolism has not occurred, and lower extremity venous morbidity has been minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

The SFPV graft demonstrates versatility and durability in selected patients who require large-caliber conduits for venous reconstruction. Because of its size and availability, the SFPV is an excellent conduit for major venous reconstruction.