Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

The Novel and Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities for Female Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction; Beyond the Traditional

Pelvic floor dysfunction is a clinical entity that is prevalent among female patients. Determining the exact underlying cause of pelvic floor dysfunction is difficult, and surgical intervention for this clinical entity may be challenging. Pelvic floor dysfunction can affect the quality of life of the patient by causing stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or both. Well-defined surgical treatment options, minimally invasive approaches, and novel techniques for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction have been recently introduced. Here, we evaluated the management options available for patients with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. We searched Medline and EMBASE databases for relevant articles by using the keywords “pelvic floor dysfunction,” “minimally invasive procedures,” “stress urinary incontinence,” “pelvic organ prolapse,” and “novel techniques”. Traditional treatment options for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are beyond the scope of our review. Laparoscopic and robotic surgical treatments for pelvic floor dysfunction continue to evolve and develop. These minimally invasive techniques will soon replace open procedures. Alternative novel treatment modalities have also been developed from novel human-compatible materials and are emerging as successful treatments for stress urinary incontinence. The development of these various treatment options has implications for future surgical practice in the field of uro-gynecology.

Functional outcome after laparoscopic nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy: a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

To date sacrocolpopexy is regarded as the reference standard treatment for primarily apical compartment prolapse and multicompartment prolapse. Most bladder and bowel dysfunction improves postoperatively after sacrocolpopexy; however, de novo bowel or de novo bladder dysfunction can occur. The inferior hypogastric nerve is commonly known among pelvic surgeons. However, the inferior hypogastric nerve and its fine fibers are difficult to identify; iatrogenic lesion is commonly tolerated although this can lead to bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. This study was performed to assess the functional outcome after nerve-sparing sacrocolpopexy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2014 to 2016 all women undergoing a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical or multicompartment prolapse stage >2 were included in this prospective study. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy was performed using the nerve-sparing approach. Objective outcome was assessed by preoperative and postoperative POP-Q changes. De novo bladder and de novo bowel dysfunction were subjectively and objectively evaluated.

RESULTS

In all, 137 women were included. Significant objective improvement for point Aa and C (p < 0.0001) preoperatively to postoperatively was seen. The posterior compartment remained unchanged with point Ba -2. De novo overactive bladder and de novo bladder outlet obstruction with elevated postresidual volume were seen for both in 0.7% (1/137). De novo stress urinary incontinence was seen in 0.7% (5/137). De novo constipation was seen in 5%, bowel incontinence in 0% and resolution of pre-existing obstipation in 14.5%. De novo laxative use (9%) in the first 12 weeks was the most common postoperative problem.

CONCLUSION

We could demonstrate that when a nerve-sparing technique is applied for sacrocolpopexy low de novo bladder (18%) and de novo bowel dysfunction can be seen.

Laparoscopic Organopexy with Non-mesh Genital (LONG) Suspension: A Novel Uterine Preservation Procedure for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse

To assess whether our novel uterus-sparing procedure- laparoscopic organopexy with non-mesh genital(LONG) suspension is an effective, safe, and timesaving surgery for the treatment of apical prolapse. Forty consecutive women with main uterine prolapse stage II or greater defined by the POP quantification(POP-Q) staging system were referred for LONG procedures at our hospitals. Clinical evaluations before and 6 months after surgery included pelvic examination, urodynamic study, and a personal interview to evaluate urinary and sexual symptoms with overactive bladder symptom score(OABSS), the short forms of Urogenital Distress Inventory(UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire(IIQ-7), and the Female Sexual Function Index(FSFI). After follow-up time of 12 to 30 months, anatomical cure rate was 85%(34/40), and the success rates for apical, anterior, and posterior vaginal prolapse were 95%(38/40), 85%(34/40), and 97.5%(39/40), respectively. Six recurrences of anterior vaginal wall all suffered from significant cystocele (stage3; Ba>+1) preoperatively. The average operative time was 73.1 ± 30.8 minutes. One bladder injury occurred and was recognized during surgery. The dyspareunia domain and total FSFI scores of the twelve sexually-active premenopausal women improved postoperatively in a significant manner (P < 0.05). The results of our study suggest that LONG suspension is an effective and safe uterus-sparing surgery for the treatment of apical prolapse.

Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem. The lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for prolapse is 11%. POP significantly affects the effects on quality of life and activities of daily living. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) has been viewed as the gold standard treatment for women with POP who desire reconstructive surgery. However, LSC is associated with technical difficulties, resulting in a long learning curve and operative time. Recently, our team introduced a new laparoscopic technique of inguinal ligament suspension (LILS) and had confirmed its safety and efficacy in treating vaginal vault prolapse. As a new surgical technique for POP, a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the LILS with the standard technique of LSC is necessary. Therefore, we will conduct a trial.

Methods

The trial is a randomized controlled trial. It compares LILS with LSC in women with stage 2 or higher uterine prolapse. The primary outcomes of this study are perioperative parameters, including surgical time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, and hospital stay as well as surgical anatomical results using the pelvic organ prolapse questionnaire (POP-Q) classification at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and annually till 5 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes are subjective improvement in urogenital symptoms and quality of life, postoperative complications, postoperative recovery, sexual functioning, and cost-effectiveness at each follow-up point. Validated questionnaires will be used and the data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Based on an objective success rate of 90%, a noninferiority margin of 15%, and a dropout of 20%, 107 patients are needed in each arm to prove the hypothesis with a 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

The trial is a randomized controlled, multicenter, noninferiority trial that will provide evidence whether the efficacy and safety of LILS is noninferior to LSC in women with symptomatic stage 2 or higher uterine prolapse.

Trial registration

China Trial Register (CTR): ChiCTR-INR-15007408. Registered on 9 November 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2494-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-term outcomes of modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (MLSC) for the treatment of advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

From May 2009 to September 2012, a consecutive prospective observational study of 30 participants was conducted to evaluate MLSC as a treatment for symptomatic advanced POP at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) classification was used to determine the POP stage. Validated tools were used to evaluate symptoms (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, PFDI-20) and sexual function (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, PISQ-12). Measurements were recorded preoperatively and then at 3 months and yearly after surgery. We compared the follow-up results with the preoperative data.

RESULTS

All participants completed a 3-year clinical follow-up routine. The anatomical results at 3 months showed significant improvements (P < 0.05) compared with the preoperative results based on the POP-Q measurements. This improvement remained significant after 3 years (P < 0.05). The anatomical cure rate was 100% and 96.7% at 3 months and 3 years after surgery, respectively. Pelvic floor function remained significantly improved after surgery compared with preceding surgery (P < 0.05) according to the following measures: PFDI-20 (106.2 vs 36.0), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6, 47.9 vs 13.7), Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory-8 (CRADI-8, 29.2 vs 9.2), and Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6, 29.2 vs 13.2). The participants maintained a high level of sexual function (PISQ-12: 29.0 vs 35.1, P < 0.05). One case of mesh exposure (3.3%) and two cases of de novo dyspareunia (8.7%) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

MLSC seems to be a safe and effective procedure that achieves good long-term anatomical and functional results.

Laparoscopic prolapse surgery: types and evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recommendations for the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse have undergone significant changes over the last few decades.First described to be too difficult, the laparoscopic technique has gained popularity but is still controversial. The recent warning on vaginal mesh was the sign of revival and we start now to have many articles published on results and on techniques for laparoscopic prolapse repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

If nothing is new in the comparison of the routes including vaginal mesh placement, the new articles are very interesting in terms of technical information and recommendations. Those articles are very important and help us understand some failures in the laparoscopic approach mainly in the anterior compartment.

SUMMARY

New models have been created and eventually in the future, we will be able to simulate the repair on our own patients and to assess virtually the mobility of each compartment preoperatively. This will allow us to adjust and tailor the treatment to each patient.

Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery

OBJECTIVE

To share our first experience with laparoscopic pectopexy, a new technique for apical prolapse surgery, and to evaluate the feasibility of this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven patients with apical prolapse underwent surgery with laparoscopic pectopexy. The lateral parts of the iliopectineal ligament were used for a bilateral mesh fixation of the descended structures. The medical records of the patients were reviewed, and the short-term clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic pectopexy procedures were successfully performed, without intraoperative and postoperative complications. De novo apical prolapse, de novo urgency, de novo constipation, stress urinary incontinence, anterior and lateral defect cystoceles, and rectoceles did not occur in any of the patients during a 6-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Although laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has shown excellent anatomical and functional long-term results, laparoscopic pectopexy offers a feasible, safe, and comfortable alternative for apical prolapse surgery. Pectopexy may increase a surgeon's technical perspective for apical prolapse surgery.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using barbed sutures for mesh fixation and peritoneal closure: A safe option to reduce operational times

Introduction:

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) has established itself as a safe method for the management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Laparoscopic suturing is a time-consuming intraoperative task during LSC. Self-retaining barbed sutures (SBSs) are known to reduce the operative time in laparoscopic cases. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBS during the performance of LSC.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty female patients with symptomatic POP were treated with LSC by an expert surgeon. The preoperative evaluation included the International Continence Society POP-quantification (POP-Q) and the prolapse-specific quality-of-life questionnaire Mesh fixation was performed with SBS anteriorly on the anterior vaginal wall and posteriorly on the levator ani muscle. A 5-mm titanium tacking device was used for promontofixation. The peritoneum was also closed with an SBS.

Results:

Mean patient's age was 63 years (range: 50–79 years). According to POP-Q, system 3 patients (15%) had Stage I, 12 patients (60%) had Stage II, 3 patients (15%) had Stage III, and 2 patients (10%) had Stage IV prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in 14 patients, respectively. Mean operative time was 99.75 (range: 65–140) min, mean blood loss was 57.75 (range: 30–120) ml. One patient had a bladder perforation intraoperatively, and three patients developed transient fever postoperatively. One patient had a recurrent cystocele and three patients recurrent rectocele.

Conclusions:

The current study renders the use of SBS during LSC to be safe and efficient. Further comparative studies would elucidate the impact of the use of SBS in LSC.

The novel technique of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair: Apical sling and "neocervix" formation

OBJECTIVE

We primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the novel technique: bilateral sacrospinous fixation by monofilament polypropylene apical sling combined with "neocervix" formation in surgical treatment of post - hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. The secondary objective was to estimate the impact of the surgery on voiding function and quality of life.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective study involved 61 women suffering from post-hysterectomy prolapse. We used the following criteria to evaluate the results of surgical treatment: results of vaginal examination (POP-Q system), uroflowmetry, bladder ultrasound, validated questionnaires were used. All listed parameters were determined before the surgery and at control examinations in 1, 6, 12 months after the treatment.

RESULTS

Mean operation time was 35min. No cases of intraoperative damage to the bladder/rectum, as well as clinically significant bleeding were noted.At 12-month follow-up anatomical cure rate (≤stage I, POP-Q) was 100%, 94,4% and 100% for vaginal apex, anterior and posterior vaginal walls, respectively. The following long-term complications were noted stress urinary incontinence de novo and urgency de novo were noted in 6.5% and 4,9%, respectively. Statistically significant (P<0.05) improvement in peak flow rate was observed according to uroflowmetry. Comparison of the scores by the questionnaires revealed a significant improvement in the quality of life in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

The novel technique: combination of the apical sling and purse-string "neocervix" formation appears to be effective and safe method for treatment patients with vaginal vault prolapse. The technique improves voiding function and quality of life.

Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: How to Avoid Short- and Long-Term Complications

Sacrocolpopexy remains the "gold standard" procedure for management of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse with improved anatomic outcomes compared to native tissue vaginal repair. Despite absence of clinical data, sacrocolpopexy is increasingly being offered to women as a primary treatment intervention for uterine prolapse. While reoperation rates remain low, recurrent prolapse and vaginal mesh exposure appear to increase over time. The potential morbidity associated with sacrocolpopexy is higher than for native tissue vaginal repair with complications including sacral hemorrhage, discitis, small bowel obstruction, port site herniation, and mesh erosion. Complications are more common during the learning curve of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Appropriate case selection is paramount to balancing the potential for prolapse recurrence with the risk of surgical complications. Use of ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh and vaginal mesh attachment with delayed absorbable suture may reduce the risks of vaginal mesh exposure.

Long-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to report long-term subjective and objective outcomes after the transvaginal mesh (TVM) procedure in long-term. Possible late-onset complications were of particular interest.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of TVM performed using Prolift™ transvaginal mesh measuring subjective outcome using validated questionnaires. Objective outcome was assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system using two definitions: POP-Q stage ≤ 1, and vaginal wall prolapse at or above the hymen or vaginal apex not descending below the upper third of the vagina. Complications were reported with the Prosthesis/Graft Complication Classification Code designed by the International Continence Society/International Urogynecological Association (ICS/IUGA).

RESULTS

Of 195 patients, 161 (82.6 %) participated this study after a median of 7 years. The scores in questionnaires evaluating urinary (UI) or anal incontinence and constipation or pelvic floor symptoms were low, indicating favorable surgical outcomes. Altogether, 80.1 % of patients were satisfied with the procedure. Anatomical cure was 56.4 % and 69.3 % depending on the definition used. Reoperation due to POP in any compartment was performed in 16.2 % of patients. Mesh exposure rate was 23 %, most of these being asymptomatic and of late onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of the TVM procedure was satisfactory. Anatomical cure was inferior to subjective cure. Mesh exposure rate was high; most exposures observed in the long-term were of late onset and were asymptomatic.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: demonstration of a nerve-sparing technique

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a well-established technique to treat apical vaginal prolapse. De novo micturition disorders, pelvic pain, and defecation disorders have been reported and may be due to intraoperative compromise of the superior hypogastric plexus. The video demonstrates our technique for nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The patient is a 62-year-old woman with symptomatic stage III posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Key steps of the procedure are opening the peritoneum at the level of the promontory, identification of the fibers of the superior hypogastric plexus, deep anterior and posterior dissection with attachment of the mesh to the vagina, displacement of the nerve fibers to the left side during suturing of the mesh to the longitudinal ligament, and complete peritonealization. This technique of the identification and protection of relevant nerve structures appears to be reproducible and can be considered by surgeons who perform laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal

INTRODUCTION

This review aimed to examine post-intervention prolapse, incontinence, and overactive bladder outcome measures published in the International Urogynecology Journal over the previous year and to report on the heterogeneity in outcome reporting.

METHODS

All original article abstracts published in the print version of the International Urogynecology Journal in 2014 were reviewed for possible inclusion. Those reporting on prolapse and/or incontinence and/or overactive bladder outcomes following a urogynecological intervention were analyzed. Articles were reviewed for all reported outcomes. Outcomes were categorized as primary or secondary and objective or subjective.

RESULTS

Of 117 original articles published, 45 were reviewed. Among primary outcomes, 9 different outcomes were reported for prolapse and 11 for incontinence and overactive bladder. For prolapse, 6 different objective and 13 subjective outcomes were reported. For incontinence, 21 objective and 36 subjective outcomes were reported. Three different definitions were used for the outcome of "prolapse cure," 3 for "prolapse recurrence," and 4 for "stress incontinence cure." Several validated and non-validated questionnaires in addition to single unvalidated questions were used to measure subjective outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This research highlights the diversity in outcome reporting for prolapse, incontinence, and overactive bladder after an intervention in the last year of publications alone. This can lead to serious challenges in the generation of higher order evidence, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses. As a subspecialty, we need to aim for more cohesive reporting so as to allow for robust comparison and evidence dissemination.

A technique of laparoscopic mesh excision from the bladder after sacrocolpopexy

Several series have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Nonetheless, complications such as mesh erosion into the bladder can occur years after primary surgery, with accidental cystotomy during the primary operation appearing to be a risk factor for later mesh erosion. Over the last 10 years, we have treated 7 patients with mesh erosion into the bladder after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using a technique of transvesical laparoscopic partial excision of the eroded mesh. None of these 7 patients developed recurrent erosions, fistulas, or recurrent prolapse. The video demonstrates laparoscopic excision of intravesical mesh in a patient 5 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Key steps are opening the bladder to grasp and dissect the eroded mesh; partial resection of the mesh with formation of a bladder flap; and closure of the bladder. Laparoscopy appears to be a useful tool for the treatment of this problem. Because many urogynecology units around the world have now begun to perform laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, urogynecologists should be aware of these complications and how to treat them. The video is intended to help and encourage centers performing laparoscopic transvesical excision of mesh eroded into the bladder after sacrocolpopexy.

Bowel and bladder dysfunction following surgery within the presacral space: an overview of neuroanatomy, function, and dysfunction

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The presacral space contains a dense and complex network of nerves that have significant effects on the innervation of the pelvic viscera and support structures. The proximity of this space to the bony promontory of the sacrum has lead to its involvement in an array of corrective surgical procedures for pelvic floor disorders including sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy. Other procedures involving the same space include presacral neurectomy which involves intentional transection of the contained neural plexus to relieve refractory pelvic pain and resection of retrorectal or presacral tumors. Potential complications of these procedures are postoperative constipation and voiding dysfunction.

METHODS

Our aim was to review the current published literature on outcomes following a variety of procedures involving the presacral space and review postoperative bowel and urinary function. We also include an overview of the functional and structural anatomy of the presacral space and its corresponding neural plexi.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that quality data are lacking on the short-term and long-term rates for bowel and bladder dysfunction following surgical procedures involving the presacral space.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with deep attachment of anterior and posterior mesh

INTRODUCTION

Sacrocolpopexy is considered a gold standard to cure apical prolapse, and since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning about complications of vaginal mesh surgery, the technique is increasingly used. Surgeons perform sacrocolpopexy in different variations, some by attaching the mesh to the apical third of the vagina, and others by applying the mesh anteriorly to the level of the bladder neck and posteriorly to the inner part of the perineum. The different techniques are neither standardized nor evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

This video aims to provide insight into the technique of deep placement of anterior and posterior mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

The video shows that deep mesh placement is feasible and can be performed with standardized parameters. The technique is based on 12 years of experience with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; 1- and 5-year results, published in this journal, show it is safe and provides good long-term results.