Treatment strategies for proximal femur fractures in osteoporotic patients

Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients

A prospective study is presented of 87 unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) with a follow-up of one year. Of the patients 76% were female. The average age was 75.3 years. The fracture was treated by closed reduction and intramedullary fixation. Pre-injury activity level was recovered in 77% of the patients. Fractures united in all patients. Mechanical failure and cut-out were not observed. A technical problem related to the mismatch of the proximal end of the nail was observed in 11 cases. Nine patients presented with thigh pain due to the redundant proximal end of the nail. The results of the PFNA were satisfactory in most elderly Chinese patients. However, the proximal end of the nail was not matched with the specific anatomy of some short elderly patients. Further modifications of the nail are necessary for the elderly Chinese population.

Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS Blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance

BACKGROUND

Compaction of cancellous bone is believed to prevent cut-out. This in vitro study quantified the compaction in the femoral head due to insertion of a dynamic hip screw-blade with and without predrilling and investigated the resulting implant anchorage under cyclic loading.

METHODS

Eight pairs of human cadaveric femoral heads were instrumented with a dynamic hip screw-blade made of Polyetheretherketon. Pairwise instrumentation was performed either with or without predrilling the specimens. CT scanning was performed before and after implantation, to measure bone-compaction. Subsequently the implant was removed and a third scan was performed to analyze the relaxation of the bone structure. Commercial implants were reinserted and the specimens were cyclically loaded until onset of cut-out occurred. The bone-implant interface was monitored by means of fluoroscopic imaging throughout the experiment. Paired t-tests were performed to identify differences regarding compaction, relaxation and cycles to failure.

FINDINGS

Bone density in the surrounding of the implant increased about 30% for the non-predrilled and 20% for the predrilled group when inserting the implant. After implant removal the predrilled specimens fully relaxed; the non-predrilled group showed about 10% plastic deformation. No differences were found regarding cycles to failure (P=0.32).

INTERPRETATION

Significant bone-compaction due to blade insertion was verified. Even though compaction was lower when predrilling the specimens, mainly elastic deformation was present, which is believed to primarily enhance the implant anchorage. Cyclic loading tests confirmed this thesis. The importance of the implantation technique with regard to predrilling is therefore decreased.

Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND

The Dynamic Hip Screw is well established for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. However, cut-out occurs in 1-6% of all cases. This study compared the biomechanical performance of a helical shaped implant (DHS-Blade) to the Dynamic Hip Screw in an unstable femoral neck fracture model.

METHODS

Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora were either instrumented with a DHS-Blade or a Dynamic Hip Screw. Osteotomies were created using a custom-made saw-guide. Cyclic loading was performed by introducing in vivo measured load-trajectories to the femoral head. Starting at 1500 N, the load was stepwise increased until failure of the construct. Radiographs were taken in 5000 cycles increments to identify onset of femoral head migration with respect to the implant. A survival analysis was performed on the cycles to onset of migration. A paired t-test was carried out on the displacements of the femoral head relative to the shaft as determined by optical motion tracking.

FINDINGS

One hundred percent migrations occurred for the Dynamic Hip Screw compared to 50% for the DHS-Blade. The survival probability in terms of implant anchorage was found higher for the blade (P=0.023). However, significant higher deformation of the repair construct was observed for the DHS-Blade (P=0.004).

INTERPRETATION

The study showed superior implant anchorage of the DHS-Blade compared to the DHS, which might reduce the cut-out risk. Nevertheless, the blade allowed higher deformation of the femur mainly resulting in shortening of the neck, which might be due to a systematic loss of fracture reduction.

MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic and proximal femur insufficiency fractures are of increasing significance in our aging population, and cross-sectional imaging is challenging. The aims of this study were to compare the sensitivity of CT and MRI in detecting insufficiency fractures; to analyze the typical location, morphology, and combinations thereof in these fractures; to analyze imaging morphology; and to analyze associated clinical findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI studies obtained at 1.5 T were analyzed in 145 patients with pelvic insufficiency fractures. In 64 of 145 patients, MRI and multidetector CT (MDCT) findings were compared. Imaging studies were analyzed by two radiologists; combined clinical history, findings from all imaging studies, and follow-up imaging studies served as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

In the subgroup undergoing both imaging techniques, MRI detected 128 of 129 (99%) fractures in 63 of 64 (98%) subjects, whereas CT detected only 89 of 129 (69%) fractures in 34 of 64 (53%) subjects. In particular, fractures at the femoral head and acetabulum were better detected with MRI. In the complete population, two or more fractures were found in 70.3% (102/145) of patients, and 89.2% (33/37) of patients with pubic insufficiency fractures had concomitant fractures at other locations. In 63 of 145 (43.4%) patients, a previous malignancy was found; in only 93 of 145 (64.1%) patients, the leading symptom responsible for the MRI examination was pain.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that MRI was substantially better than CT in detecting insufficiency fractures. In addition, two or more insufficiency fractures were frequently present, typical fracture combinations were found, and insufficiency fractures were frequently associated with malignant disease.

Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation--a systematic literature review

The goal of our systematic literature search was to prove whether the experimentally shown influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation could be confirmed in clinical studies. Despite significant effects in several studies, this is not supported by pooled data due to lack of accurate osteoporosis assessment and complication definitions.

INTRODUCTION

The fact that osteoporosis causes fractures is well-known; the assumption that it aggravates their orthopaedic treatment has not been proven. The goal of our systematic literature search was to find out whether the experimentally proven influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation could be confirmed in clinical studies.

METHODS

A systematic electronic database search was performed identifying articles that evaluated complications after fracture fixation among patients suspected of having osteoporosis as measured by BMD or surrogates including Singh index or risk factors. To determine complications risks (relative risk within 95% confidence interval) data were pooled across studies, weighted by sample size and stratified by treatment type.

RESULTS

Ten studies out of 77 randomized controlled trials (51 hip, 23 distal radius and three proximal humerus studies) and three systematic reviews finally met eligibility criteria. Despite significant differences of the relative complication risk between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients in several studies, this could not be proven in the pooled data.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to biomechanical evidence that local osteoporosis affects anchorage of implants, this could not be reproduced in clinical studies, due to the lack of accurate osteoporosis assessment, missing complication definitions and heterogeneous inclusion criteria in these studies. Prospective studies are required that address specifically the correlation between local bone status and the risk of fixation failure.

Quantification of bone strength by intraoperative torque measurement: a technical note

INTRODUCTION

Bone strength describes the resistance of bone against mechanical failure. Bone strength depends on both the amount of bone and the bone's quality, and the bone strength may be looked upon as a relevant parameter to judge an osteosynthesis' stability. Information about bone strength was barely available intraoperatively in the past. The previous work of our group reported on development and laboratory evaluation of mechanical torque measurement as a method for the intraoperative quantification of bone strength. With the clinical series presented here we intend to verify that the im gesamten Text DensiProbe instrumentation for intraoperative torque measurement and the related measurement method are eligible for intraoperative use based on the following criteria: application of the method may not create complications, the measurement can be performed by the surgeon himself and may only cause a limited increase in the procedure time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 2006 until May 2007 ten patients with a pertrochanteric femoral fracture or a lateral femoral neck fracture eligible for stabilization with DHS were included in the study after having received informed consent. Any medication and comorbidity that might have influenced bone quality or bone mineral density (BMD) in these patients was documented. Bone strength was intraoperatively measured with DensiProbe. Complications that were obviously related with torque measurement were documented as well as any deviation from the suggested procedure; 6 and 12 weeks postoperative follow-up included clinical and radiological examination. The time required for torque measurement, the overall operating time and the number of persons present in the operating room were protocolled. BMD values of the contralateral femoral neck were postoperatively assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and compared to intraoperative peak torque values measured by DensiProbe.

RESULTS

No major complication was observed during intraoperative application of DensiProbe by trained surgeons. The unintended extraction of the guide wire together with the torque measurement probe was reported only once and is looked upon as a minor complication. Fracture healing was uneventful in all patients. The mean time for torque measurement was 2.35 +/- 0.9 min accounting for 2.2 +/- 1.1% of total surgery time. The presence of an additional person was not required to perform torque measurement but to protocol the data. There was a tendency towards correlation between BMD values of the femoral neck and intraoperative peak torque values.

DISCUSSION

The data presented clearly indicate that the DensiProbe instrumentation and measurement principle are eligible for routine intraoperative use by trained surgeons. Interpretation of possible correlations between BMD values measured by means of DEXA and the Peak Torque values assessed by DensiProbe has to be considered very carefully, because BMD and Peak Torque analyse bone at a different scale. Only within the framework of a multicenter study it will be possible to include a sufficient number of patients for calculation of the methods' predictive value towards implant failure and to verify acceptance of the method by the surgeons.

Hip, Osteoporosis: New Paradigm

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease. Recently, the paradigm for diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis has undergone changes due to new findings on this disease. With the arrival of densitometers that could measure BMD we started using medications that block further degradation of density and repair the densitometric results. More recent findings, however, suggest that the BMD value influences the predicted success of future fracture prevention in less than 50%. The remainder is attributed to bone quality. There are a number of risk factors for osteoporotic fractures, some of greater and some of lesser significance. A small external force is necessary to cause an osteoporotic fracture; otherwise, the osteoporotic bone still does not break. The dominant factor in a fracture is therefore the fall of the elderly patient. Falls are preventable, although most are benign and injury free. Only in the recent decade have we started paying attention to the fall phenomenon, which does not only involve accidents, but is also a consequence of the normal aging process. Incidence of falls and hip fractures in residential elderly patients can be reduced with a multifactorial interdisciplinary prevention program (MIPP):• Staff training • Adaptation of environment • Gait and mobility exercise • Technical accessories • Revision of pharmacotherapy (psychotropics) • Hip protectors • Post-fall problem-solving conferences. Mobility exercise is useful in elderly groups; however, the maintenance of mobility is not linked to a reduction of fall risk. Hip protectors are protective pads designed to cover the greater trochanter and attenuate or disperse the force of fall sufficiently to prevent a hip fracture. A number of cost-benefit studies on residential elderly patients between 2004 and 2006 proved the efficacy of MIPP and hip protectors, and some studies did so also on those patients living independently. Unfortunately, as much as 75% of women and 90% ofmen at high risk in nursing homes are not investigated, and 75% of those affected are not treated.

„Cutting out“ bei pertrochantären Frakturen – ein Problem der Osteoporose?

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of intramedullary fixation devices for the stabilisation of intertrochanteric fractures, the rate of complications is still high. One of the main reasons for burdensome reinterventions in 9-15% of cases is the cutting out of the fixation device through both the spongious bone and the cortical bone at the apex of the femoral head. This phenomenon is strongly connected to the reduction of the fractures achieved, the technical performance of the operation with optimal implant positioning and the resistance of the trabecular bone in the femoral head against deformation by the fixation device. The latter is very low in cases of severe osteoporosis. To prevent the complication of cutting out, it seems sensible to find the limits of load-bearing capacity of individual osteoporosis-associated features (i.e. bone mineral density) at which special additional measures or other techniques for the treatment of these patients are desired.

METHODS

In a first step a new biomechanical standard test for implants stabilizing unstable trochanteric fractures was developed, which would provide predictable results depending on bone mineral density. In a second step a cut-off limit was sought for the bone density in the proximal femur that would afford stable fixation as measured by QCT (quantitative computed tomography) and DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry).

RESULTS

The developed test is realistic; it can be used to study typical cutting out phenomena on cadaver femora. In an unstable fracture model (type A 2.3 of the AO classification), the implants DHS with TSP, PFN and TGN showed a stable long-term load-bearing capacity at a bone mineral density of >0.6 g/cm3. In 5 of 32 specimens a cutting out phenomenon could be demonstrated, in 4 cases if the bone mineral density of the proximal femur was below 0.6 g/cm3 as measured by DEXA, and in one case poor performance of the implant (short screw in the femoral head) was evident.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of bone density of >0.6 g/cm3 in the proximal femur (DEXA), the standard implants for the fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures could guarantee fixation without cutting out. The critical value of sufficient bone density in our few cases seems to be around 0.6 g/cm3 as measured by DEXA. Further investigation is needed to define the limits of bone mineral density for a successful osteosynthesis. An appropriate augmentation of the trabecular bone of the femoral head or a new design of the central loading device could increase the load-bearing capacity and thus help to reduce the cutting out phenomenon. Another alternative could be the primary implantation of an endoprosthesis in the treatment of these patients.