Hepatic metastases of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: safe hepatic surgery

Small hepatocellular carcinoma in Child A cirrhotic patients: hepatic resection versus transplantation

Hepatic resection (HR) is the treatment of choice for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a noncirrhotic liver, whereas liver transplantation (LT) offers better results in patients with impaired hepatic function (Child B and C). However, it is still debated whether HR or LT is the best strategy for patients with Child A cirrhosis. We conducted a retrospective study on 37 consecutive patients with Child A cirrhosis and small HCC, treated between 1991 and 1999. Seventeen of these patients, who underwent LT, were compared with 20 patients who underwent HR, and prognostic factors for survival and tumor recurrence were analyzed. The primary endpoints were the intention-to-treat, 3- and 5-year survival, and 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival. Three- and 5-year patient survival rate both were significantly (P =.04) higher in the LT group (87% and 71%, respectively) than in the HR group (67 and 36% respectively). Similarly, the 3- and 5- year recurrence-free survival rates were 87% and 80% for the LT group, and 52% and 40% for the HR group (P =.03). Absence of microscopic vascular invasion was the only other prognostic factor correlated with significantly better recurrence-free survival (P =.02). Therefore, we concluded that in patients with Child A cirrhosis and small HCC, liver transplantation resulted in better overall and disease-free survival than HR.

Staging of digestive endocrine tumours using helical computed tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy

BACKGROUND

In patients with digestive endocrine tumours, complete pre-operative staging is essential in planning proper management and evaluating treatment efficacy. To date, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) is considered the 'gold standard' imaging procedure, and very few data are available concerning the use of helical computed tomography (hCT). This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy and the ability to modify the surgical management of hCT, alone or combined with SRS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were staged before surgery by hCT, SRS and tumour markers, and included in group 1 if suitable for radical surgery, otherwise in group 2. All patients underwent laparotomy followed by subsequent re-staging.

RESULTS

SRS sensitivity was 77%, 48% and 67% for primary, lymph-node and liver lesions, respectively. hCT sensitivity was 94%, 69% and 94% for primary, lymph-node and liver lesions, respectively (P = 0.02 versus SRS, for liver lesions). During pre-operative evaluation, hCT correctly staged 92% and SRS 75% of patients (P = 0.02). hCT provided additional information in 17% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Since hCT has been shown to be extremely accurate, providing essential information for the planning of surgical treatment compared with that of SRS, both techniques should be used in the pre-operative work-up of digestive endocrine tumours.

Interstitial ablative techniques for hepatic tumours

BACKGROUND

Most patients with liver tumours are not suitable for surgery but interstitial ablative techniques may control disease progression and improve survival rates.

METHODS

A review was undertaken using Medline of all reported studies of cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, interstitial laser photocoagulation, high-intensity focused ultrasound and ethanol ablation of primary liver tumours and hepatic metastases.

RESULTS

Although there are no randomized clinical trials, cryoablation, thermal ablation and ethanol ablation have all been shown to be associated with improved palliation in patients with primary and secondary liver cancer. The techniques can be undertaken safely with minimal morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Although surgical resection remains the first line of treatment for selected patients with primary and secondary liver malignancies, interstitial ablative techniques are promising therapies for patients not suitable for hepatic resection or as an adjunct to liver surgery.

Hepatic surgery for metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

Cytoreductive therapy is effective in the management of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors to the liver, independent of their functioning status. In functioning tumors, clinical endocrinopathies are relieved in most patients and this response usually lasts for several months. Major morbidity and mortality are not greater than the average complication rate for resection for nonneuroendocrine metastatic tumors at major centers; therefore, surgical outcomes appear to justify operative intervention. Patients whose primary tumor can be controlled, whose metastases outside the liver are limited, and who have a reasonable performance status are candidates for resection. The authors' data support the previous statements. The current mortality rate of 1.2% and major morbidity rate of 15% clearly represent the success of the operative approach in such complex cases (54% of patients received a resection of at least one lobe) [9]. A symptomatic response in the 95% range with a median response of 45 months adds many months of symptom-free survival to the lives of most patients [9]. In the literature reviewed for this article, more than half of the patients also underwent a major hepatic resection and 40% of them had concurrent resection of the primary tumor. These data confirm that resection in selected patients is not more complicated or risky than resection for other metastatic tumors. Endocrinopathies have not increased anesthetic or operative risk in this population; however, these results are the product of managing these patients over time, becoming familiar with their clinical syndromes, and being active in the prevention of life-threatening endocrine complications (i.e., carcinoid crisis). The authors have learned over time that patients with valvular disease are not good candidates for surgery. These patients develop right-sided heart failure with an increase in the central venous pressure. This condition can result in massive hemorrhage during the liver resection because of the difficulty in controlling backbleeding from the hepatic veins [26]. Correction of valvular disease is warranted for safe liver resection. The authors' current policy is to rule out valvular disease in every patient with carcinoid tumors and repair the valves prior to hepatic resection when indicated [27]. This policy clearly has decreased the complication rate. Even though liver transplantation seems to be very attractive as a means of eradicating the disease, this has not been common in clinical practice because of the shortage of allografts, and the overall costs and complications of the procedure override its benefits, especially when compared with partial hepatectomy. Current methods to detect the spread of disease that were not readily available in the past, such as MRI and indium-111 pentetreotide (Octreoscan), may expand the applications of transplantation and allow for better selection of candidates. The option of transplantation is still open for improvement and is dependent on organ availability and better staging of the disease. Metastases from neuroendocrine tumors are hypervascular, favoring the application of MRI as the single imaging method; MRI not only evaluates the location and characteristics of the lesions but also determines the relationship with major vessels and bile ducts. Spiral CT scan has been used extensively in the past with acceptable results. Indium-111 pentetreotide functions on the base of somatostatin receptors present in these tumors, but its use has not been established definitely in the work-up of these patients. Perhaps the best use of indium-111 pentetreotide is in the evaluation of disease beyond the primary and liver locations, including bone metastases; its use therefore will likely affect the preoperative work-up of candidates for transplantation [28]. Once the patient has been deemed to have resectable disease by the preoperative work-up, several steps need to be completed prior to surgery to decrease the effect of specific endocrinopathies. For patients with symptoms related to carcinoid tumors, preoperative preparation with 150 to 500 micrograms of somatostatin decreases the chances of carcinoid crisis, which is manifested by hemodynamic instability [29]. The use of this medication intraoperatively should be kept in mind because a carcinoid crisis can occur despite anesthetic premedication. For islet cell tumors, treatment of underlying endocrinopathy has been initiated before referral for surgical treatment in most patients. Surgery is appropriate for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors for the following two reasons: (1) many of them still have the primary tumor in place and resection should be undertaken to avoid acute complications and (2) the addition of adjunctive ablative therapies to surgical resection accomplishes the control of greater than or equal to 90% of the bulk of the tumor. If preoperative evaluation indicates that less than 90% of the tumor is treatable, surgical therapy is contraindicated. Last, even when complete resections are performed, the recurrence rate for these tumors is extremely high. In practical terms, patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors are seldom cured. The best hope physicians can offer these patients is an extended survival period with minimal endocrine symptoms and decreased requirements of somatostatin analogs.