Identification of risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after gastric surgery

Anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy constructed by circular stapler (OrVil™) versus linear stapler (overlap method)

BACKGROUND

Esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is the most technically difficult type of anastomosis; thus, anastomotic complications such as leakage and stenosis sometimes occur. Identification of the safest anastomotic procedure is important for successful LTG. We have performed LTG since 2004 either with a circular stapler using an OrVil^™ anvil or via the overlap Orringer method with a linear stapler. This retrospective study aimed to determine which method results in a lower incidence of anastomotic complications in patients undergoing LTG.

METHODS

Data on 188 consecutive patients who underwent LTG between April 2004 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into those who underwent esophagojejunostomy performed via a circular stapler using an OrVil^™ anvil (group C, n = 49) or via the overlap method (group L, n = 139).

RESULTS

Anastomotic complications occurred in five of 188 esophagojejunostomies (2.7%). They comprised three cases of leakage (1.6%), and two of stenosis (1.1%). There was no significant difference in patient characteristics or hematological variables between groups C and L. There was no significant difference between groups in operation time, blood loss, lymph node dissection, and intraoperative anastomotic problems. The rate of anastomotic complications was significantly lower in group L (0.7%, 1/139) than in group C (8.2%, 4/49; p = 0.005). In particular, anastomotic leakage in group L tended to be lower (0.7% 1/139) than in group C (4.1% 2/49), although this difference was not significant. The rate of anastomotic stenosis in group L was significantly lower (0%, 0/139) than in group C (4.1%, 2/49; p = 0.017). Furthermore multivariate analysis showed anastomotic procedure was an independent factor for anastomotic complication.

CONCLUSIONS

There were fewer anastomotic complications after overlap esophagojejunostomy than after esophagojejunostomy via the OrVil^™ procedure, especially regarding anastomotic stenosis. We therefore recommend the overlap technique when performing esophagojejunostomy.

Development of a nomogram for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer

AIMS

To investigate the incidence of and factors associated with anastomotic leakage (AL) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 3632 patients who underwent a laparoscopic gastrectomy or open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A logistic regression model was used to identify the determinant variables, and a nomogram for AL was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 3632 patients were included in the study, 50 of whom (1.4%) developed AL. Postoperative deaths occurred in 6 (0.2%) patients with AL failure to rescue. Esophagojejunal AL (27/50) and Billroth I AL (20/50) were the most common types of AL. Gastrografin swallow was the main diagnostic method. The diagnosis was made a median of 9 days postoperatively. The median healing time for AL was 34.5 days. Of the 50 AL patients, 56% of patients could be managed nonsurgically, whereas 28% of patients required percutaneous radiologic drainage, 6% of patients were treated by endoscopy, and 10% of patients required a second surgery. A multivariate analysis showed the following adverse risk factors for AL: age ≥65 years, hemoglobin ≤8.0 g/dL and malnourishment. A multivariable model for AL showed a strong optimism-adjusted discrimination (concordance index, 0.675). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without or with AL were 59.4% and 67.4%, respectively (p = 0.354).

CONCLUSIONS

AL was infrequent but was more prevalent in patients with age ≥65 years, hemoglobin ≤8.0 g/dL and malnourishment. We created a novel nomogram that can provide individualized prediction of AL in patients after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer, which may help clinicians in making treatment decisions.

How could we identify the 'old' patient in gastric cancer surgery? A single centre cohort study

PURPOSE

To analyze the population submitted to gastric cancer surgery in our Institution in order to find those characteristics which could help in the identification of the elderly high-risk patient.

METHODS

In a cohort of 263 patients (>65 y) we selectively investigated the risk factors for medical and surgical complications and postoperative mortality, focusing on the variable "age". All the significant variables were used to find predictors of complications with Clavien-Dindo>2.

RESULTS

Age>75 (AUC 0.61; 95% 0.55-0.67, p = 0.003) and ASA score >2 (AUC 0.60; 95% CI 0.54-0.67, p = 0.01) were significantly associated with an increased risk of medical complications. Operative time >330 min (OR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; p = 0.0001- AUC 0.62, 95% CI 0.56-0.68, p = 0.01) was the only significant predictor of surgical complications. In-hospital mortality (6/263 patients) was significantly associated with preoperative albumin ≤2.95 g/dl (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.93, p = 0.041 - AUC 0.74 95% CI 0.68-0.80; p = 0.003) and additional procedures (OR 7.05; 1.23-40.32, p = 0.03). Stepwise multivariate analysis showed that albumin ≤2.95 g/dl (OR 3.43; 95% CI 1.06-11.13 p = 0.033), ASA>2 (OR 9.51; 95% CI 1.23-72.97; p = 0.042) and additional resections (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.36-8.45; p = 0.045) were independent risk factors for complications Clavien Dindo >2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work demonstrated that, in our institution, 75 years of age could identify the elderly in gastric surgery as those patients were at higher risk of medical complications. ASA >2, preoperative serum albumin ≤2.95 g/dl and the need of additional procedures could increase the risk of severe postoperative adverse events.

Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: options of treatment

BACKGROUND

Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy (TG) for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma (ADC) constitutes one of the most serious and sometimes life-threatening complications. Management remains controversial and still challenging.

METHODS

A total of 198 patients operated for type I and II EGJ ADC were reviewed. Diagnosis of leakage was based on a combination of clinical and radiological findings. It was classified including objective endoscopic and clinical parameters requiring different type of treatment.

RESULTS

Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed in 14 patients (7%). Two cases recovered with conservative therapy. Six cases underwent endoscopy with clips placement in 2 and partially covered self-expandable metal stent placement in 4. Other two cases underwent reoperation with reconstruction of anastomosis and primary repair respectively. In the last four cases emergency surgery with total esophagectomy and diversion was required. Mortality occurred only in 3 of these patients and overall treatment was successful in 11 patients (78.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

No consensus has been reached on the best method of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage management and the rate of failure remains significant. Different options of treatment are available but early detection and multidisciplinary approaches are the keys to obtain successful results irrespective of the employed strategy.

Recent improvements in the management of esophageal anastomotic leak after surgery for cancer

Anastomotic leakage following total gastrectomy or esophagectomy is a significant complication that considerably increases postoperative mortality. The location of the anastomosis together with the anatomy of the esophagus explains the severity of this complication. Surgical knowledge should include general and specific predictive factors of leakage to avoid any technical-related cause of leakage. Clinical presentations may vary from minimally symptomatic to life-threatening situations. Investigations should be undertaken as soon as the diagnosis is suspected because delay greatly worsens the prognosis. CT scans with oral contrast and low insufflation early endoscopy are the preferred diagnostic tools and can also aid in therapeutic procedures. Communication and multidisciplinary teamwork are the cornerstones of treatment. When the leak occurs early with acute and important sepsis, the recommendation is surgical treatment. On the contrary, if the leak is late, non-symptomatic or minimally symptomatic, conservative management with intensive surveillance could be proposed. When the situation is in between these two extremes, endoscopic treatment is often proposed. Based on a review of the literature and experience from high volume centers, in this educational review, we present the incidence, predictive factors, clinical presentations, diagnostic tools, management, and therapeutic algorithms for anastomotic leaks following elective esophagectomy and total gastrectomy for cancer.

Non-Randomized Confirmatory Trial of Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy and Proximal Gastrectomy with Nodal Dissection for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1401

Several prospective studies on laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer have been initiated, but no prospective study evaluating laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy or laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy has been completed to date. A non-randomized confirmatory trial was commenced in April 2015 to evaluate the safety of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer. A total of 245 patients will be accrued from 42 Japanese institutions over 3 years. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with anastomotic leakage. The secondary endpoints are overall survival, relapse-free survival, proportion of patients with completed laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy or laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy, proportion of patients with conversion to open surgery, adverse events, and short-term clinical outcomes. The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number is UMIN000017155.

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Gastric Surgical Unit

Purpose

Although several studies report risk factors for anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, they have yielded conflicting results. The present retrospective cohort study was performed to identify risk factors that are consistently associated with anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy for stomach cancer.

Materials and Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy at a single gastric surgical unit between May 2003 and December 2012 were identified retrospectively. The associations between anastomotic leakage and 23 variables related to patient history, diagnosis, and surgery were assessed and analyzed with logistic regression.

Results

In total, 3,827 patients were included. The rate of anastomotic leakage was 1.88% (72/3,827). Multiple regression analysis showed that male sex (P=0.001), preoperative/intraoperative transfusion (P<0.001), presence of cardiovascular disease (P=0.023), and tumor location (P<0.001) were predictive of anastomotic leakage. Patients with and without leakage did not differ significantly in terms of their 5-year survival: 97.6 vs. 109.5 months (P=0.076).

Conclusions

Male sex, cardiovascular disease, perioperative transfusion, and tumor location in the upper third of the stomach were associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Although several studies have reported that an anastomotic complication has a negative impact on long-term survival, this association was not observed in the present study.

Can the intraoperative leak test prevent postoperative leakage of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total gastrectomy?

PURPOSE

Anastomotic failures that cannot be detected during surgery often lead to postoperative leakage. There have been no detailed reports on the intraoperative leak test for esophagojejunal anastomosis. Our purpose was to investigate the utility of routine intraoperative leak testing to prevent postoperative anastomotic leakage after performing esophagojejunostomy.

METHODS

We prospectively performed routine air leak tests and reviewed the records of 185 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent open total gastrectomy followed by esophagojejunostomy.

RESULTS

A positive leak test was found for six patients (3.2 %). These patients with positive leak tests were subsequently treated with additional suturing, and they developed no postoperative anastomotic leakage. However, anastomotic leakage occurred in nine patients (4.9 %) with negative leak tests. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that a patient age >75 years and the surgeon's experience <30 cases were risk factors for anastomotic leakage.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative leak testing can detect some physical dehiscence, and additional suturing may prevent anastomotic leakage. However, it cannot prevent all anastomotic leakage caused by other factors, such as the surgeons' experience and patients' age.

Systematic review of anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy

AIM: To investigate the anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy (EJS) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), we reviewed retrospective studies.

METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed for studies published from January 1, 1994 through January 31, 2015. The search terms included “laparoscopic,”“total gastrectomy,” and “gastric cancer.” First, we selected 16 non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LTG with open total gastrectomy (OTG) and conducted an updated meta-analysis of anastomotic complications after total gastrectomy. The Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the non-RCTs included in this study. Next, we reviewed anastomotic complications in 46 case studies of LTG to compare the various procedures for EJS.

RESULTS: The overall incidence of anastomotic leakage associated with EJS was 3.0% (30 of 984 patients) among LTG procedures and 2.1% (31 of 1500 patients) among OTG procedures in the 16 non-RCTs. The incidence of anastomotic leakage did not differ significantly between LTG and OTG (odds OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 0.86-2.33, P = 0.17, I² = 0%). Anastomotic stenosis related to EJS was reported in 72 (2.9%) of 2484 patients, and the incidence was 3.2% among LTG procedures and 2.7% among OTG procedures. The incidence of anastomotic stenosis related to EJS was slightly, but not significantly, higher in LTG than in OTG (OR = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.94-2.54, P = 0.08, I² = 0%). The various procedures for LTG were classified into six categories in the review of case studies of LTG. The incidence of EJS leakage was similar (1.1% to 3.2%), although the incidence of EJS stenosis was relatively high when the OrVil^TM device was used (8.8%) compared with other procedures (1.0% to 3.6%).

CONCLUSION: The incidence of anastomotic complications associated with EJS was not different between LTG and OTG. Anastomotic stenosis was relatively common when the OrVil^TM device was used.

Treatment of Esophagojejunal Anastomosis Leakage: A Systematic Review from the Last Two Decades

Esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage is one of the major complications after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and is an independent predictor of survival. Our aim is to systematically review the literature and discuss the reported therapeutic approaches to identify the best therapeutic approach. Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CILEA Archive, BMJ Clinical Evidence, and Up ToDate databases were screened limiting the research to articles written in English from January 1992 through December 2013. This way a total of 474 manuscripts were retrieved for furthermore evaluation. Eleven manuscripts were considered eligible and the study is focused on those works. We analyzed a total of 3,893 patients and 114 cases of esophagojejunal anastomosis leakage. Different treatments were grouped into three main categories: conservative approach (66 cases), endoscopic approach (21 cases), and surgical approach (27 cases). The overall mortality rate is 26.32 per cent and surgical approach showed the higher rate. According to the reported data, a complete resolution of the leakage can be achieved in an interval ranging from 7 to 28 days in the group treated conservatively. Conservative approach should always be considered as the treatment of choice. Reoperation may be necessary in case of wide dehiscence or when other treatments fail; therefore, the high mortality rate related to this procedure is due to the comorbidities of patients undergoing relaparotomy. Finally, endoscopic approach with endoclips seems promising but needs furthermore studies.

Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery: diagnosis and management

Anastomotic leakage represents a major complication of gastrointestinal surgery, leading to increased postoperative morbidity; it the foremost cause of mortality after intestinal resection. Identification of risk factors is essential for the prevention of AL. AL can present with various clinical pictures, ranging from the absence of symptoms to life-threatening septic shock. Contrast-enhanced CT scan is the most complete investigation to define AL and its consequences. Early and optimal multidisciplinary management is based on three options: medical management, radiologic or endoscopic intervention, or surgical re-intervention. Prompt treatment should help decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality, with the choice depending on the septic status of the patient. If the patient is asymptomatic, treatment can be medical only, coupled with close surveillance. Interventional management is indicated when the fistula is symptomatic but not life-threatening. On the other hand, when the vital prognosis is engaged, surgery is indicated, emergently, associated with intensive care. Even more than their prevention, early and appropriate management counts most to decrease their consequences.

Improving the outcomes in gastric cancer surgery

Gastric cancer remains a significant health problem worldwide and surgery is currently the only potentially curative treatment option. Gastric cancer surgery is generally considered to be high risk surgery and five-year survival rates are poor, therefore a continuous strive to improve outcomes for these patients is warranted. Fortunately, in the last decades several potential advances have been introduced that intervene at various stages of the treatment process. This review provides an overview of methods implemented in pre-, intra- and postoperative stage of gastric cancer surgery to improve outcome. Better preoperative risk assessment using comorbidity index (e.g., Charlson comorbidity index), assessment of nutritional status (e.g., short nutritional assessment questionnaire, nutritional risk screening - 2002) and frailty assessment (Groningen frailty indicator, Edmonton frail scale, Hopkins frailty) was introduced. Also preoperative optimization of patients using prehabilitation has future potential. Implementation of fast-track or enhanced recovery after surgery programs is showing promising results, although future studies have to determine what the exact optimal strategy is. Introduction of laparoscopic surgery has shown improvement of results as well as optimization of lymph node dissection. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has not shown to be beneficial in peritoneal metastatic disease thus far. Advances in postoperative care include optimal timing of oral diet, which has been shown to reduce hospital stay. In general, hospital volume, i.e., centralization, and clinical audits might further improve the outcome in gastric cancer surgery. In conclusion, progress has been made in improving the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. However, gastric cancer treatment is high risk surgery and many areas for future research remain.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal tumors after surgery: Causes and treatments

AIM: To investigate the causes and treatments of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal tumors.

METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 21 patients with gastrointestinal tumors who developed gastrointestinal bleeding after surgery for gastrointestinal tumors between January 2009 and January 2014 at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Among them, 19 patients had early and 2 patients had late gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

RESULTS: Eighteen patients recovered after appropriate treatments such as conservative therapy, endoscopic treatment, digital subtraction angiography and reoperation. One patient abandoned treatment and 2 patients died after the reoperation.

CONCLUSION: There are many reasons for postoperative hemorrhage in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. Effective treatments and standard surgery technique are key solutions for gastrointestinal bleeding after surgery for gastrointestinal tumors.

Is laparoscopic total gastrectomy a safe operation? A review of various anastomotic techniques and their outcomes

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is an accepted option for gastric cancer surgery; however, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is not widely performed. There is concern about the safety of the operation due to the difficulty of extracorporeal reconstruction through a mini-laparotomy. Efforts have been made to establish an intracorporeal anastomotic technique for esophagojejunostomy. This article reviews the current techniques available for laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy and their surgical outcomes. Several different techniques using either circular or linear staplers have been reported; however, the apparent superiority of any particular method has not been confirmed. The incidence of anastomosis-related complications varied among studies, but different techniques all successfully achieved excellent outcomes. The overall complication rate of LTG was similar to that of open total gastrectomy, suggesting that LTG is a safe and feasible option. However, the feasibility of LTG with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced upper gastric cancer needs to be confirmed in further studies, because most of the patients included in the LTG studies were diagnosed with early stages of disease.

Clinical analysis of embedding treatment for gastroesophageal anastomotic stoma during resection of esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer

AIM: To evaluate the necessity of the embedding treatment for anastomotic stoma during resection of esophageal and cardiac carcinoma.

METHODS: From March 2012 to August 2013, 244 patients underwent the resection of esophageal and cardiac carcinoma at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. These patients were divided into two groups: a control group and an experimental group. The control group (n = 166) underwent surgery with embedding treatment for anastomotic stoma, while the experimental group (n = 78) underwent simple anastomosis. Postoperative parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: The rate of anastomotic leakage was 1.28% (1/78) in the experimental group and 5.42% (9/166) in the control group (P = 0.24). The anastomotic diameter was 13.23 ± 2.93 mm in the experimental group and 10.91 ± 2.80 mm in the control group (P = 0.00). The rate of anastomotic stricture was 5.26% (4/76) in the experimental group and 17.42% (27/155) in the control group (P = 0.01). The dysphagia score in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P = 0.02), while the reflux score between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.50).

CONCLUSION: The embedding treatment for gastroesophageal anastomotic stoma can not effectively prevent the formation of the anastomotic leakage and the occurrence of reflux esophagitis but increases the incidence of anastomotic stricture.

Seamless vascularized large-diameter tubular collagen scaffolds reinforced with polymer knittings for esophageal regenerative medicine

A clinical demand exists for alternatives to repair the esophagus in case of congenital defects, cancer, or trauma. A seamless biocompatible off-the-shelf large-diameter tubular scaffold, which is accessible for vascularization, could set the stage for regenerative medicine of the esophagus. The use of seamless scaffolds eliminates the error-prone tubularization step, which is necessary when emanating from flat scaffolds. In this study, we developed and characterized three different types of seamless tubular scaffolds, and evaluated in vivo tissue compatibility, including vascularization by omental wrapping. Scaffolds (luminal Ø ∼ 1.5 cm) were constructed using freezing, lyophilizing, and cross-linking techniques and included (1) single-layered porous collagen scaffold, (2) dual-layered (porous+dense) collagen scaffold, and (3) hybrid scaffold (collagen+incorporated polycaprolacton knitting). The latter had an ultimate tensile strength comparable to a porcine esophagus. To induce rapid vascularization, scaffolds were implanted in the omentum of sheep using a wrapping technique. After 6 weeks of biocompatibility, vascularization, calcification, and hypoxia were evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Scaffolds were biocompatible, and cellular influx and ingrowth of blood vessels were observed throughout the whole scaffold. No calcification was observed, and slight hypoxic conditions were detected only in the direct vicinity of the polymer knitting. It is concluded that seamless large-diameter tubular collagen-based scaffolds can be constructed and vascularized in vivo. Such scaffolds provide novel tools for esophageal reconstruction.

Impact of being overweight on the surgical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the effect of being overweight on the surgical results of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS: Comprehensive electronic searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted. Studies were identified that included patients with surgical complications from gastric cancer who were classified as normal weight [body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m²] or overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²). The operative time, retrieved lymph nodes, blood loss, and long-term survival were analyzed. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on whether patients received laparoscopic or open gastrectomy procedures. All statistical tests were performed using ReviewerManager 5.1.2 software.

RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 23 studies with 20678 patients (15781 with BMI < 25 kg/m²; 4897 with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²). Overweight patients had significantly increased operation times [MD: -29.14; 95%CI: -38.14-(-20.21); P < 0.00001], blood loss [MD: -194.58; 95%CI: -314.21-(-74.95); P = 0.001], complications (RR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.66-0.85; P < 0.00001), anastomosis leakages (RR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.42-0.82; P = 0.002), and pancreatic fistulas (RR: 0.486; 95%CI: 0.34-0.63; P < 0.00001), whereas lymph node retrieval was decreased significantly in the overweight group (MD: 1.69; 95%CI: 0.75-2.62; P < 0.0001). In addition, overweight patients had poorer long-term survival (RR: 1.14; 95%CI: 1.07-1.20; P < 0.0001). No significant difference was detected for the mortality and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that a high BMI not only increases the surgical difficulty and complications but also impairs the long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer.

Impact of being overweight on the surgical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the effect of being overweight on the surgical results of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS: Comprehensive electronic searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted. Studies were identified that included patients with surgical complications from gastric cancer who were classified as normal weight [body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m²] or overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²). The operative time, retrieved lymph nodes, blood loss, and long-term survival were analyzed. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on whether patients received laparoscopic or open gastrectomy procedures. All statistical tests were performed using ReviewerManager 5.1.2 software.

RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 23 studies with 20678 patients (15781 with BMI < 25 kg/m²; 4897 with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²). Overweight patients had significantly increased operation times [MD: -29.14; 95%CI: -38.14-(-20.21); P < 0.00001], blood loss [MD: -194.58; 95%CI: -314.21-(-74.95); P = 0.001], complications (RR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.66-0.85; P < 0.00001), anastomosis leakages (RR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.42-0.82; P = 0.002), and pancreatic fistulas (RR: 0.486; 95%CI: 0.34-0.63; P < 0.00001), whereas lymph node retrieval was decreased significantly in the overweight group (MD: 1.69; 95%CI: 0.75-2.62; P < 0.0001). In addition, overweight patients had poorer long-term survival (RR: 1.14; 95%CI: 1.07-1.20; P < 0.0001). No significant difference was detected for the mortality and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that a high BMI not only increases the surgical difficulty and complications but also impairs the long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer.

Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between intraoperative anastomotic troubles and the incidence of esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL), and to identify risk factors for EJAL after elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

This study reviewed the medical and surgical records of 327 patients who underwent elective gastrectomy followed by esophagojejunostomy. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for EJAL.

RESULTS

An EJAL occurred in 19 patients (5.8 %). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that hemoglobin A1c ≥7.0 % (p < 0.01), chronic renal failure (p < 0.01), proximal gastrectomy (p < 0.05), and anastomotic trouble during construction of the esophagojejunostomy (p < 0.01) were independent predictors for EJAL. Anastomotic trouble during construction of esophagojejunostomy occurred in 20 patients (6.1 %), and EJAL occurred in 6 of these 20 patients (30 %). Four of ten patients (40 %) in whom an incomplete anastomosis was repaired by suturing during surgery had an EJAL, while none of seven patients who underwent re-anastomosis had this complication.

CONCLUSIONS

EJAL is strongly associated with intraoperative technical errors. To reduce this complication, proper anastomotic techniques are required. Re-anastomosis should be performed when an incomplete anastomosis is discovered during surgery.