Rituximab therapy increased post-transplant cytomegalovirus complications in Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Management of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Despite more effective front-line regimens, a substantial portion of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapse and require further therapy. Several trials have established the efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, but the benefit has been largely restricted to patients with chemosensitive disease and low-risk features at the time of relapse. In an effort to improve outcomes following an autologous transplant, researchers are exploring several avenues, including improvement of salvage regimens, addition of radioimmunotherapy to preparative regimens, and application of posttransplant treatments to eliminate minimal residual disease. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation also appears promising, but there is much to learn about optimal patient selection and timing. This review outlines the current approach to the management of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with an emphasis on newer peritransplant therapies.

Risk factors for infection in haematology patients treated with rituximab

OBJECTIVES

Although rituximab therapy is not considered to be closely associated with infection, there have been reports of serious infections in patients treated with rituximab. We performed a statistical retrospective analysis to clarify the risk factors for infection in patients receiving rituximab therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective study of data from clinical records was performed that targeted haematology patients treated at our university hospital between April 2003 and October 2006. We selected 63 patients with CD20-positive lymphoma whose peripheral blood immunoglobulin levels had been measured within 6 months before and after rituximab therapy. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk factors for serious infection in these patients.

RESULTS

The three risk factors identified were: 1) reduction in IgM after administration of rituximab [odds ratio (OR) = 1.032, confidence interval (CI) = 1.007-1.057; P = 0.009], 2) duration of rituximab therapy [OR = 0.962, CI = 0.932-0.994; P = 0.021] and 3) G-CSF administration [OR = 4.825, CI = 1.411-16.495; P = 0.012].

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab therapy may be associated with infection, indicating the need for sequential monitoring of IgM levels and identification of the optimal interval between rituximab cycles.