Interim PET/CT-based prognostic model for the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the post-rituximab era

Prospective Study of 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine PET for Early Interim Response Assessment in Advanced-Stage B-Cell Lymphoma

Current clinical and imaging tools remain suboptimal for early assessment of prognosis and treatment response in aggressive lymphomas. PET with 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) can be used to measure tumor cell proliferation and treatment response. In a prospective study in patients with advanced-stage B-cell lymphoma, we investigated the prognostic and predictive value of (18)F-FLT PET in comparison to standard imaging with (18)F-FDG PET and clinical outcome.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients were treated with an induction/consolidation regimen consisting of 4 cycles of R-CHOP-14 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) followed by 3 cycles of ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide). (18)F-FLT PET was performed at baseline and at interim (iPET) after 1-2 cycles of therapy. (18)F-FDG PET was performed at baseline, after cycle 4, and at the end of therapy. The relationship between PET findings, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 51 mo, PFS and OS were 71% and 86%, respectively. (18)F-FLT iPET, analyzed visually (using a 5-point score) or semiquantitatively (using SUV and ΔSUV) predicted both PFS and OS (P < 0.01 for all parameters). Residual (18)F-FLT SUVmax on iPET was associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio, 1.26, P = 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio, 1.27, P = 0.002). When (18)F-FDG PET was used, findings in the end of treatment scan were better predictors of PFS and OS than findings on the interim scan. Baseline PET imaging parameters, including SUV, proliferative volume, or metabolic tumor volume, did not correlate with outcome.

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FLT PET after 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy predicts PFS and OS, and a negative (18)F-FLT iPET result may potentially help design risk-adapted therapies in patients with aggressive lymphomas. In contrast, the positive predictive value of (18)F-FLT iPET remains too low to justify changes in patient management.

Utility of baseline 18FDG-PET/CT functional parameters in defining prognosis of primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma

18FDG PET/CT is a very important staging tool for patients with PMBCL. Metabolic activity defined by TLG on the baseline PET scan is a powerful predictor of PMBCL outcome.

Response-adapted therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas based on early [18F] FDG-PET scanning: ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group study (E3404)

A persistently positive positron emission tomography (PET) scan during therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is predictive of treatment failure. A response-adapted strategy consisting of an early treatment change to four cycles of R-ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) was studied in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 trial. Previously untreated patients with DLBCL stage III, IV, or bulky II, were eligible. PET scan was performed after three cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) and scored as positive or negative by central review during the fourth cycle. PET-positive patients received four cycles of R-ICE, PET-negative patients received two more cycles of R-CHOP. A ≥ 45% 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) for mid-treatment PET-positive patients was viewed as promising. Of 74 patients, 16% were PET positive, 79% negative. The PET positivity rate was much lower than the 33% expected. Two-year PFS was 70%; 42% [90% confidence interval (CI), 19-63%] for PET-positives and 76% (90% CI 65-84%) for PET-negatives. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 69% (90% CI 43-85%) and 93% (90% CI 86-97%) for PET-positive and -negative cases, respectively. The 2-year PFS for mid-treatment PET-positive patients intensified to R-ICE was 42%, with a wide confidence interval due to the low proportion of positive mid-treatment PET scans. Treatment modification based on early PET scanning should remain confined to clinical trials.

Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group

PURPOSE

Recent advances in imaging, use of prognostic indices, and molecular profiling techniques have the potential to improve disease characterization and outcomes in lymphoma. International trials are under way to test image-based response–adapted treatment guided by early interim positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT). Progress in imaging is influencing trial design and affecting clinical practice. In particular, a five-point scale to grade response using PET-CT, which can be adapted to suit requirements for early- and late-response assessment with good interobserver agreement, is becoming widely used both in practice- and response-adapted trials. A workshop held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas (ICML) in 2011 concluded that revision to current staging and response criteria was timely.

METHODS

An imaging working group composed of representatives from major international cooperative groups was asked to review the literature, share knowledge about research in progress, and identify key areas for research pertaining to imaging and lymphoma.

RESULTS

A working paper was circulated for comment and presented at the Fourth International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma in Menton, France, and the 12th ICML in Lugano, Switzerland, to update the International Harmonisation Project guidance regarding PET. Recommendations were made to optimize the use of PET-CT in staging and response assessment of lymphoma, including qualitative and quantitative methods.

CONCLUSION

This article comprises the consensus reached to update guidance on the use of PET-CT for staging and response assessment for [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymphomas in clinical practice and late-phase trials.

Predictive value of interim PET/CT in DLBCL treated with R-CHOP: meta-analysis

Objective. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy. Methods. We searched for articles published in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Scopus, and Ovid database from inception to March 2014. Articles related to interim PET/CT in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy were selected. PFS with or without OS was chosen as the endpoint to evaluate the prognostic significance of interim PET/CT. Results. Six studies with a total of 605 cases were included. The sensitivity of interim PET/CT ranged from 21.2% to 89.7%, and the pooled sensitivity was 52.4%. The specificity of interim PET/CT ranged from 37.4% to 90.7%, and the pooled specificity was 67.8%. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 1.780 and 0.706, respectively. The explained AUC was 0.6978 and the Q^* was 0.6519. Conclusions. The sensitivity and specificity of interim PET/CT in predicting the outcome of DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy were not satisfactory (52.4% and 67.8%, resp.). To improve this, some more work should be done to unify the response criteria and some more research to assess the prognostic value of interim PET/CT with semiquantitative analysis.

Diffusion-weighted MRI compared to FDG PET/CT for assessment of early treatment response in lymphoma

BACKGROUND

18F fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT) is a well-recognized diagnostic tool used for staging and monitoring of therapy response for lymphomas. During the past decade diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being included in the assessment of tumor response for various cancers.

PURPOSE

To compare the change in maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUVmax) from FDG PET/CT with the change in apparent diffusion coefficient (ΔADC) from DW MRI after initiation of the first cycle of chemotherapy in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients with histologically proven lymphoma and lymphomatous lymph nodes (LLN) of the neck (19 with HL, 8 with DLBCL) underwent FDG PET/CT and MRI of the neck before and after initiation of the first cycle of chemotherapy. The mean time interval from initiation of chemotherapy to imaging was 19 days and 2 days for FDG PET/CT and MRI, respectively. For each patient ΔSUVmax, ΔADC, and change in volume of the same LLN were compared.

RESULTS

There was a significant mean decrease of SUVmax by 70%, but no significant change in ADC. There was no significant reduction in LLN volume.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant correlation between ΔSUVmax and ΔADC. Thus, our data do not support that FDG PET/CT can be replaced by early DW MRI for response evaluation in lymphoma patients.

The use of FDG-PET in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL): predicting outcome following first line therapy

Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) has become a standard clinical tool for staging and response assessment in aggressive lymphomas. The use of PET scans in clinical trials is still under exploration, however. In this review, we examine current data regarding PET in DLBCL, and its potential applicability to development of a surrogate endpoint to expedite clinical trial conduct. Interim PET scanning in DLBCL shows mixed results, with qualitative assessment variably associated with outcome. Addition of quantitative assessment might improve predictive power of interim scans. Data from multiple retrospective studies support that PET-defined response at end of treatment correlates with outcome in DLBCL. Optimal technical criteria for standardization of acquisition and criteria for interpretation of scans require further study. Prospective studies to define the correlation of PET-defined response and time-dependent outcomes such as progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), critical for development of PET as a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials, are ongoing. In conclusion, evolving data regarding utility of PET in predictcing outcome of patients with DLBCL show promise to support the use of PET as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials of DLBCL in the future.

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography after one cycle of chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of a Nordic/US intergroup study

We evaluated the predictive value of interim positon emission tomography (I-PET) after one course of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). One hundred and twelve patients with DLBCL were enrolled. All patients had PET/computed tomography (CT) scans performed after one course of chemotherapy (PET-1). I-PET scans were categorized according to International Harmonization Project criteria (IHP), Deauville 5-point scale (D 5PS) with scores 1-3 considered negative (D 5PS > 3) and D 5PS with scores 1-4 considered negative (D 5PS = 5). Ratios of tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to liver SUVmax were also analyzed. We found no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between PET-negative and PET-positive patients according to IHP and D 5PS > 3. The 2-year PFS using D 5PS = 5 was 50.9% in the PET-positive group and 84.8% in the PET-negative group (p = 0.002). A tumor/liver SUVmax cut-off of 3.1 to distinguish D 5PS scores of 4 and 5 provided the best prognostic value. PET after one course of chemotherapy was not able to safely discriminate PET-positive and PET-negative patients in different prognostic groups.

Management of relapsed-refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Relapsed-Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (RR DLBCL), which accounts for approximately one-third of patients with DLBCL, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Managing RR DLBCL continues to be a challenge to the treating hemato-oncologist. Salvage high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard of care for chemosensitive relapses in DLBCL. Various salvage regimens are available, but the quest for an optimal regimen continues. The addition of rituximab to the salvage regimen has improved the outcome of RR DLBCL. Several pertinent issues regarding the management of RR DLBCL are discussed in this short review.

The rate of reduction in the maximum standardized uptake value from the initial to the post-R-CHOP therapy in positron emission tomography scan predicts disease progression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients

[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is useful for primary staging and evaluation of treatment outcome in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. The reduction in the maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUVmax) from the initial to the interim 18F-FDG PET scan has been reported to predict survival in DLBCL patients. We retrospectively evaluated ΔSUVmax obtained by PET or PET-computed tomography before and after initial therapy in 31 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients who were treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) therapy. Receiver observation characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the optimal cutoff value for the ΔSUVmax for disease progression. The 3-year progression-free survival rate of patients with ΔSUVmax≥83 and <83% was found to be 91 and 25%, respectively (P<0.001). The 4-year overall survival rate of patients with ΔSUVmax≥83 and <83% was found to be 100 and 83%, respectively (P=0.046). The ΔSUVmax observed before and after R-CHOP therapy could be useful in the prediction of disease progression and survival in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients.

When should FDG-PET be used in the modern management of lymphoma?

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique that, combined with computerized tomography (PET-CT), is increasingly used in lymphoma. Most subtypes accumulate fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and the increased sensitivity of PET-CT, especially for extranodal disease, compared to CT, makes PET-CT an attractive staging tool. The availability of a staging PET-CT scan also improves the accuracy of subsequent response assessment. 'Interim' PET-CT can be used to assess early response and end-of-treatment PET-CT assesses remission. Clinical trials are currently seeking to establish whether the predictive value of PET-CT can be successfully used to guide individual treatment to reduce toxicity and/or to improve outcomes. Standardized methods for performing and reporting PET have been developed in the context of trials. The role of PET in transplantation selection is currently evolving, as it appears to be more accurate and prognostic than CT. The role of FDG PET-CT throughout the management course in patients with lymphoma is explored in this review, with areas discussed that may limit the use of PET-CT imaging which clinicians should be familiar with to inform practice.