Comparison of two contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in enhancing the density of the the aorta, portal vein and liver at multi-detector row CT: a randomized study

Effect of contrast enhanced CT scans on heterogeneity corrected dose computations in the lung

The aim of this study was to investigate and, if possible, compensate for the effect of intravenous contrast‐enhanced CT scans on the treatment planning dose distributions for lung patients. The contrast and noncontrast CT scans of 3 patients were registered, and the effect of contrast on the Hounsfield units (HU) was assessed. The effect of contrast was then simulated in the CT scans of 18 patients receiving radiotherapy of the lung by modification of the CT numbers for relevant sections of noncontrast‐enhanced CT scans. All treatment planning was performed on the Pinnacle³ planning system. The dose distributions computed from simulated contrast CT scans were compared to the original dose distributions by comparison of the monitor units (MUs) for each beam in the treatment plan required to deliver the prescribed dose to the isocenter as well as a comparison of the total MUs for each patient, a percentage change in required MUs being equivalent to a percentage change in the dose. A correction strategy to enable the use of contrast‐enhanced CT scans in treatment planning was developed, and the feasibility of applying the strategy was investigated by calculating dose distributions for both the original and simulated contrast CT scans. A mean increase in the overall patient MUs of 1.0 ± 0.8% was found, with a maximum increase of 3.3% when contrast was simulated on the original CT scans. The simulated contrast scans confirmed that the use of contrast‐enhanced CT scans for routine treatment planning would result in a systematic change in the dose delivered to the isocenter. The devised correction strategy had no clinically relevant effect on the dose distribution for the original CT scans. The application of the correction strategy to the simulated contrast CT scans led to a reduction of the mean difference in the overall MUs to 0.1 ± 0.2% compared to the original scan, demonstrating that the effect of contrast was eliminated with the correction strategy. This work has highlighted the problems associated with using contrast‐enhanced CT scans in heterogeneity corrected dose computation. Contrast visible in the CT scan is transient and should not be accounted for in the treatment plan. A correction strategy has been developed that minimizes the effect of intravenous contrast while having no clinical effect on noncontrast CT scans. The correction strategy allows the use of contrast without detriment to the treatment plan.

PACS number: 87.53.Tf

Multidetector CT (64 Slices) of the liver: examination techniques

Sixty-four-row MDCT, although developed primarily for cardiac imaging, has the potential to have a great impact on liver imaging as well. Liver-imaging protocols with sub-millimeter collimation improve longitudinal spatial resolution, making the acquired dataset a real isotropic volume perfectly designed for optimal three-dimensional rendering and accurate organ and lesion volumetry. The 64-row detector array offers a wide volumetric coverage (up to 40 mm), suitable not only for shortening scanning time and improving spatial resolution, but also for including a large volume per single rotation, particularly useful for accurate CT perfusion studies. In order to take full benefit from the enormous performance offered by new 64-row MDCT scanners, imaging protocols need to be redesigned. Due to the extremely short scanning window, contrast agent injection should be performed at high flow rate and followed by saline bolus chaser; the use of highly concentrated contrast media might be useful. Timing should be accurately calculated either by a test bolus or, better, by using an automatic bolus-detection technique. Radiation exposure is kept under control, using automatic device-modulating dose delivery according to the patient's anatomy. Finally, the evaluation of acquired volumetric datasets needs the extensive use of a dedicated workstation, with software with sophisticated rendering capabilities.

Multi-detector row CT of the head and neck: comparison of different volumes of contrast material with and without a saline chaser

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different volumes of contrast material with and without a saline chaser on tissue enhancement in multidetector row CT (MDCT) of the head and neck.

METHODS

In a blind prospective fashion, 120 patients were randomized into the following four groups: group 1, 80 ml contrast material administered at a flow rate of 2.0 ml/s; group 2, 80 ml followed by 40 ml saline at 2.0 ml/s; group 3, 60 ml at 1.5 ml/s; and group 4, 60 ml followed by 30 ml saline at 1.5 ml/s. The attenuation values of the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, and muscle were measured at an interval of 1.5 s in each patient. The degree of perivenous artifacts was subjectively assessed.

RESULTS

Mean attenuation values in the carotid artery and internal jugular vein were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4. The width of the diagnostic window (both carotid and jugular enhancement >150 HU) were significantly longer in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4. The addition of a saline chaser did not result in improved vascular enhancement or a wider diagnostic window, but reduced perivenous artifacts, compared with using contrast material alone.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of contrast material from 80 to 60 ml results in insufficient enhancement of neck vessels. In addition, the benefit of a saline chaser technique is not obvious except for its ability to reduce perivenous artifacts.

IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review studies evaluating how contrast concentration affects MDCT of the body and to report IV contrast infusion protocols from MDCT angiography and MDCT of abdominal tumors.

CONCLUSION

Higher concentrations (350 mg I/mL or greater) may improve visualization of small abdominal arteries. However, preliminary data comparing 300 mg I/mL to higher concentrations for MDCT of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer have shown that higher concentrations may not increase tumor conspicuity.