Early decompressive craniectomy may be effective in the treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury

Controversies of prophylactic hypothermia and the emerging use of brain tissue oxygen tension monitoring and decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain-injured children

BACKGROUND

Despite being the leading cause of death and disability in the paediatric population, traumatic brain injury (TBI) in this group is largely understudied. Clinical practice within the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) has been based upon adult guidelines however children are significantly different in terms of mechanism, pathophysiology and consequence of injury.

AIM

To review TBI management in the PICU and gain insight into potential management strategies.

METHOD

To conduct this review, a literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, PUBMED and The Cochrane Library using the following key words; traumatic brain injury; paediatric; hypothermia. There were no date restrictions applied to ensure that past studies, whose principles remain current were not excluded.

RESULTS

Three areas were identified from the literature search and will be discussed against current acknowledged treatment strategies: Prophylactic hypothermia, brain tissue oxygen tension monitoring and decompressive craniectomy.

CONCLUSION

Previous literature has failed to fully address paediatric specific management protocols and we therefore have little evidence-based guidance. This review has shown that there is an emerging and ongoing trend towards paediatric specific TBI research in particular the area of moderate prophylactic hypothermia (MPH).

Characteristics of pediatric trauma in an urban city in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the characteristics of recent pediatric injuries in an urban city in Japan.

METHODS

Any patient who was under 13 years old and admitted for treatment of trauma between January 2000 and December 2007 was retrospectively investigated. The subjects were divided into 2 groups, the head injury (HI) and the control groups. The HI group had an abbreviated injury score (AIS) of the head greater than 1, and the control group had an AIS of the head equal to 0 or 1.

RESULTS

The number of patients in the HI group was 95; and in the control group, 74. There were no penetrating injuries. The proportion of patients who were run over in the HI group was smaller than that in the control group. The injury severity score in the HI group was greater than that in the control group. The abdominal AIS in the HI group was smaller than that in the control group. The number of extracranial injuries (sum of all AIS except for the head) in the HI group was smaller than that in the control group. The survival rate in the HI group was smaller than that in the control group. All causes of death in the HI group were cerebral complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity and outcome of pediatric blunt traumas were dependent on HI. Because the extracranial injuries with an HI were not severe, the successful treatment of the cerebral complications could lead to favorable outcome.

Intracranial pressure and cerebral oxygenation changes after decompressive craniectomy in a child with traumatic brain swelling

CASE REPORT

The authors present the case of a 5-year-old child with severe traumatic brain injury in whom decompressive hemicraniectomy was performed for progressive increased intracranial pressure (ICP) unresponsive to medical treatment. Data from ICP and cerebral tissue oxygenation monitoring in the contralateral hemisphere were recorded, which demonstrated the immediate and delayed mechanical and physiological changes occurring after bony and dural decompression.

DISCUSSION

The role of the procedure and that of the monitoring approach are discussed.

Decompression craniectomy after traumatic brain injury: recent experimental results

Among the secondary events occurring after traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathologically increased intracranial pressure (ICP) correlates most closely with poor outcome. In addition to infusion of hypertonic solutions, e.g. mannitol, and other medical measures, decompression of the brain by surgical removal of a portion of the cranium (craniectomy) has been used for many decades as an intuitive strategy for the treatment of post-traumatic ICP increase. The lack of evidence-based clinical and controversial experimental data, however, resulted in decompressive craniectomy to be recommended by most national and international guidelines only as a third tier therapy for the treatment of pathologically elevated ICP. Ongoing clinical trials on the use of decompressive craniectomy after TBI may clarify many aspects of the clinical application of this technique, however, some important pathophysiological issues, e.g. the timing of decompression craniectomy, its effect on brain edema formation, and its role for secondary brain damage, are still widely discussed and can only be addressed in experimental settings. The aim of the current review was therefore to summarize and discuss recent experimental data dealing with the use of decompression craniectomy following TBI. The present results suggest that surgical decompression effectively prevents secondary brain damage when performed early enough. Although caution should be taken when transferring conclusions drawn from experimental settings to the clinical situation, the current literature suggests that the timing of decompression may be of utmost importance in order to exploit the full neuroprotective potential of craniectomy following TBI.

Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

High intracranial pressure (ICP) is the most frequent cause of death and disability after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). High ICP is treated by general maneuvers (normothermia, sedation etc) and a set of first line therapeutic measures (moderate hypocapnia, mannitol etc). When these measures fail to control high ICP, second line therapies are started. Among these, second line therapies such as barbiturates, hyperventilation, moderate hypothermia or removal of a variable amount of skull bone (known as decompressive craniectomy) are used.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of secondary decompressive craniectomy (DC) on outcome and quality of life in patients with severe TBI in whom conventional medical therapeutic measures have failed to control raised ICP.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Trial Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Best Evidence, Clinical Practice Guidelines, PubMed, CINAHL, the National Research Register and Google Scholar. We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings and contacted experts in the field and the authors of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized or quasi-randomized studies assessing patients over the age of 12 months with a severe TBI who underwent DC to control ICP refractory to conventional medical treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently examined the electronic search results for reports of possibly relevant trials and for retrieval in full. One author applied the selection criteria, performed the data extraction and assessed methodological quality. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

We found one trial with 27 participants conducted in the pediatric population (>18 years). DC was associated with a risk ratio (RR) for death of 0.54 (95% CI 0.17 to 1.72), and RR of 0.54 for death, vegetative status or severe disability 6 to 12 months after injury (95% CI 0.29 to 1.07).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support the routine use of secondary DC to reduce unfavourable outcome in adults with severe TBI and refractory high ICP. In the pediatric population DC reduces the risk of death and unfavourable outcome. Despite the wide confidence intervals for death and the small sample size of the only study identified, this treatment maybe justified in patients below the age of 18 when maximal medical treatment has failed to control ICP. To date, there are no results from randomised trials to confirm or refute the effectiveness of DC in adults. However, the results of non-randomized trials and controlled trials with historical controls involving adults, suggest that DC may be a useful option when maximal medical treatment has failed to control ICP. There are two ongoing randomized controlled trials of DC (Rescue ICP and DECRAN) that may allow further conclusions on the efficacy of this procedure in adults.