Surgery for extratemporal nonlesional epilepsy in children: a meta-analysis

Paediatric intractable epilepsy syndromes: changing concepts in diagnosis and management

Epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant childhood epilepsy is not new. However, brain imaging, surgical and anaesthetic techniques have improved to the extent that they are now as much safer and realistic option than they were in the past. Further, the range of surgical candidates is wide, and previous concepts about likely surgical candidates are now challenged as children with previously thought widespread or apparent multifocal disease are evaluated. Outcomes for seizure freedom range from 40 to 80 % depending on the underlying aetiology and the extent of resection. However, the aims of surgery may include seizure reduction in some and improvement in neurodevelopment and behaviour in others, which are less -predictable. Epilepsy surgery in children is no longer a last resort. Children thought to be likely candidates should be evaluated early in their natural history to optimise outcomes in the long term.

Selecting patients for epilepsy surgery: identifying a structural lesion

One of the most important components of presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy is structural imaging, predominantly using magnetic resonance imaging. This study is now part of the basic assessment of patients with epilepsy and is as important as the electroencephalogram. Epilepsy protocol magnetic resonance imaging studies must be part of the overall assessment of the patient. To understand the basis of the epileptic disorder, interpretation of these investigations relies on knowledge of the clinical details and features of the seizures, the functional abnormality in the brain as shown on the electroencephalogram, and structural assessment of the brain with a magnetic resonance imaging study optimized for epilepsy. This review considers the essential elements of this issue and gives a broad overview of what imaging options are available for the investigation of the patient with epilepsy from the perspective of the practicing epileptologist.

Extratemporal, nonlesional epilepsy in children: postsurgical clinical and neurocognitive outcomes

OBJECT

Patients undergoing epilepsy surgery without evidence of a lesion on MR imaging and without a temporal source for seizure onset generally have less favorable outcomes than patients with structural lesions or temporal onset. However, many of these patients are viable candidates for invasive monitoring and subsequent resection or multiple subpial transections (MSTs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical treatment of pediatric patients with extratemporal, nonlesional epilepsy in order to better understand the clinical and neuropsychological outcomes expected in this patient group.

METHODS

Forty-three pediatric patients with negative results on MR imaging and lateralized, extratemporal findings on electroencephalography underwent invasive monitoring with grid and/or strip electrodes. Thirty-three subsequently had resection of an epileptogenic focus and/or MSTs.

RESULTS

Outcome was classified as Engel class I or II in 54.5% of the patients who underwent resection/MSTs and Engel class III or IV in 45.5%. Use of MSTs was associated with poor outcome. Neuropsychological evaluation showed significant improvement in immediate auditory attention following surgery and revealed several significant results on subgroup analysis. Complications occurred in 14% of patients (a 7% rate per procedure). Ten patients (23%) underwent invasive monitoring without proceeding to therapeutic surgery because no epileptogenic region was amenable to resection. Neuropsychological outcomes were generally stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with extratemporal, nonlesional seizures are viable candidates for invasive monitoring with grid/strip electrodes, and good outcomes can be obtained with resective surgery. The use of MSTs may correlate with worse outcome. This study also provides additional data to assist in counseling patients on the risks of negative invasive monitoring, deficits resulting from resection/MSTs, and possible operative complications.

Epilepsy surgery in children compared to adults

AIM

The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of various surgical techniques and surgical outcome between pediatric and adult populations that underwent epilepsy surgery by the same team.

METHODS

All patients who underwent epilepsy surgery at the Tel Aviv Medical Center between 1997 and 2006 and had been followed up for >2 years were eligible for this study. The majority (90%) of all epilepsy surgeries carried out in Israel were performed in this institution and by a single neurosurgeon. Only patients that underwent video-EEG monitoring as part of the presurgical evaluation were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients (131 adults and 55 children) underwent epilepsy surgery in our institute during the study period, and follow-up was available for 177 patients (95%). While the adults underwent significantly more temporal lobe resections (51 vs. 20%, p < 0.0001), the children had significantly more extra-temporal non-lesional resections (18 vs. 1%, p < 0.0001) and hemispherectomies (5 vs. 1%, p = 0.002). Over one half (54%) of all the patients had a postoperative reduction in seizures of >90%, and 72% had a reduction of >50%, with no group difference in surgical success. Among the lesionectomies, the outcome was better for tumors, especially those in the temporal lobe. Only 1% of the patients had a long-term neurological deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

Children comprised 30% of the epilepsy surgical cases during the study period. Children underwent more non-lesional resections and hemispherectomies, while adults underwent more temporal lobe resections. There was no age-related difference in surgical outcome.

Surgery for extratemporal nonlesional epilepsy in adults: an outcome meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To better evaluate surgery for extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE) in adults, we conducted a meta-analysis of previous studies that analyzed postoperative seizure outcomes for ETLE.

METHODS

After searching PubMed for appropriate studies, patient data were reviewed, and data on patients who fit the authors' criteria were extracted. Statistical analysis compared each variable with surgical outcome to determine if an association existed.

RESULTS

For the 131 patients who were included in the analysis, the age at surgery, age of seizure onset, and duration of epilepsy were not found to be statistically and significantly related to seizure outcome. Similarly, seizure semiology, abnormality on magnetic resonance imaging, lateralization of the seizures, the need for intracranial monitoring, pathological findings, and the type and location of surgery did not appear to be associated with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirms the findings of other centers: ETLE surgical outcomes are less desirable than those for temporal lobe epilepsy. None of the factors studied in adults showed significant association with outcome. Contrary to some reports, shortening the duration of epilepsy by pursuing surgery as early as possible also does not appear to improve outcomes. The creation of standard protocols among epilepsy centers is needed to allow for a detailed evaluation of outcomes across different centers and, ultimately, to better assess the factors associated with improved outcomes.