Comparative analysis of late functional outcome following preoperative radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery or surgery alone in rectal cancer

Short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery versus conventional chemoradiotherapy: A comparison of the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with T3 rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery (SRT-delay) and a standard conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimen.

METHODS

Two collaborating institutions adopted different regimens; the SRT-delay regimen was selected by Meiwa Hospital and the CRT regimen was selected by Hyogo College of Medicine. The inclusion criteria were T3 middle and low rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery after preoperative therapy. The median follow-up period was 44 months (range, 12-85).

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2013, 104 patients were treated using the SRT-delay regimen and 61 patients were treated using the CRT regimen. The pretreatment characteristics of the 2 groups were not significantly different. The sphincter-preserving rate (93.3%, 85.2%), T downstaging (37.5%, 37.7%), ypN(-) (74.0%, 67.2%), postoperative complications and the bowel, and urinary and sexual functioning of the SRT-delay regimen were noninferior to those of the CRT regimen. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival in the SRT-delay and CRT groups were 90.6% and 90.6% (P = .764), 83.8% and 78.3% (P = .687) and 96.0% and 92.8% (P = .833), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The SRT-delay regimen was noninferior in terms of the downstaging effect, and oncologic and functional outcomes compared with the CRT regimen for T3 middle and low rectal cancer.

Reduced luminal circumference of tumors plays a key role in anorectal function during the early period after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

The deterioration of anorectal function after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) combined with surgery for rectal cancer has not been well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the tumor response to nCRT and changes in anorectal function during a short-term period after nCRT.

METHODS

We analyzed 100 consecutive patients with available preoperative anorectal manometry data, both before and after nCRT, from 2010 to 2013.

RESULTS

Comparing the manometric data before and after nCRT, the values reflecting rectal sensory function after nCRT was significantly lower than those before nCRT. However, in patients who experienced changed tumor morphology and a reduction in luminal circumferential ratio (LCIR) of tumor after nCRT, the values reflecting rectal sensory function were significantly less decreased after nCRT. On multivariate analysis, the reduction of LCIR after nCRT was a very important factor preventing the impairment of anorectal function during the short-term period in terms of the first rectal sensory threshold (RST) (P = 0.002), the RST of "desire to defecate" (P = 0.006), and rectal compliance (P = 0.003). Additionally, in linear regression analysis, the RST for the desire to defecate was positively affected by tumor morphology (P = 0.015) and the reduced LCIR (P = 0.025), and rectal compliance was positively affected by the reduced LCIR (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The nCRT impaired significantly rectal sensory function during the short-term period after nCRT and before a radical operation. However, this reduced LCIR of tumors after nCRT may prevent or minimize impediments to anorectal function during the short-term period after nCRT.

Clinical follow-up does not improve survival after resection of stage I-III colorectal cancer: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of clinical follow-up alongside CT & CEA in detecting recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. Despite this, clinical review remains part of most surveillance protocols. This study assessed the efficacy of clinical follow-up in addition to CT/CEA in detecting disease recurrence.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for CRC at a single centre between 2009 and 2011 were identified. Follow-up included clinical review, CT and CEA for 5 years. The primary endpoint of the study was method of detection of recurrence. Secondary endpoints included detection of surgically treatable recurrence, compliance with follow-up, disease free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

118 patients with stage I-III CRC were included. Only 68.9% of scheduled follow-up events were performed (76.6% clinical reviews, 76.2% CT scans and 60.4% CEA tests). At median follow-up of 36 months, 26 patients had developed recurrence (median DFS 45.8 months). 17 patients (14.7%) had died (median OS 49.3 months). Sensitivity and specificity of follow up modality in detecting recurrence were; CT (92.3%, 100%), CEA (57.7%, 100%), clinical review (23.0%, 27.2%). Addition of clinical review did not identify any disease recurrence that was not detected by scheduled CT. Eight patients (30.7%) had surgically treatable recurrence - all were identified by scheduled CT.

CONCLUSION

The addition of CEA testing and clinical review to scheduled CT scanning offered no benefit in the detection of recurrent disease. Clinical review could be removed from follow-up protocols without any reduction in the detection of recurrent cancer.

Clinical results and toxicity for short-course preoperative radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients

Short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) is an alternative method to chemoirradiation for patients with Stage II and III rectal cancer when no downsizing is needed, but there is still widespread reluctance to use this method because of fear of side effects from high-fraction doses. This paper reports on a single institution patient cohort of operated rectal cancer patients after SCPRT, evaluated for chronic adverse effects, local control, progression-free survival and overall survival. Altogether, 257 patients were treated with SCPRT and surgery including total mesorectal excision (92% total mesorectal excision = TME) between 2002 and 2009. Local control and survival were analyzed. Chronic adverse effects for 154 patients without local relapse were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 classification, with a median follow-up of 48 months. We found a 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 71%. The 5-year estimated local control (LC) rate was 94%. A positive resection margin was found in 4% of the patients and was significantly correlated with decreased DFS, OS and LC. Chronic adverse effects were reported by 58% of the patients, of which 10% were Grade 3 toxicities. The most frequent Grade 2 toxicity was stool incontinence (13%). Sexual dysfunction was found in 36% of the patients (31% Grade 1 or 2, and only 5% Grade 3). SCPRT combined with TME produced excellent LC rates together with a low rate of high-grade chronic adverse effects.

Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer in 2014: Where are we going?

In the present review we discuss the recent developments and future directions in the multimodal treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, with respect to staging and re-staging modalities, to the current role of neoadjuvant chemo-radiation and to the conservative and more limited surgical approaches based on tumour response after neoadjuvant combined therapy. When initial tumor staging is considered a high accuracy has been reported for T pre-treatment staging, while preoperative lymph node mapping is still suboptimal. With respect to tumour re-staging, all the current available modalities still present a limited accuracy, in particular in defining a complete response. The role of short vs long-course radiotherapy regimens as well as the optimal time of surgery are still unclear and under investigation by means of ongoing randomized trials. Observational management or local excision following tumour complete response are promising alternatives to total mesorectal excision, but need further evaluation, and their use outside of a clinical trial is not recommended. The preoperative selection of patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant radiotherapy or not, as well as the proper identification of a clinical complete tumour response after combined treatment modalities,will influence the future directions in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.