Femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: preliminary 6-month results

Comparison of astigmatic correction after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism

Purpose

To compare postoperative astigmatic correction between femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with myopic astigmatism.

Methods

We examined 26 eyes of 26 patients undergoing FLEx and 26 eyes of 26 patients undergoing SMILE to correct myopic astigmatism (manifest astigmatism of 1 diopter (D) or more). Visual acuity, cylindrical refraction, the predictability of the astigmatic correction, and the astigmatic vector components using Alpin’s method, were compared between the two groups 3 months postoperatively.

Results

We found no statistically significant difference in manifest cylindrical refraction (p=0.74) or in the percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D of their refraction (p=0.47) after the two surgical procedures. Moreover, no statistically significant difference was detected between the groups in astigmatic vector components, namely, surgically induced astigmatism (0.80), target induced astigmatism (p=0.87), astigmatic correction index (p=0.77), angle of error (p=0.24), difference vector (p=0.76), index of success (p=0.91), flattening effect (p=0.79), and flattening index (p=0.84).

Conclusions

Both FLEx and SMILE procedures are essentially equivalent in correcting myopic astigmatism using vector analysis, suggesting that the lifting or non-lifting of the flap does not significantly affect astigmatic outcomes after these surgical procedures.

Small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia: results of a 12-month prospective study

PURPOSE

To analyze the safety, efficacy, stability, and predictability of small-incision lenticule extraction to correct myopia.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated preoperatively and then at 1 day, at 2 weeks, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Safety, efficacy, stability, predictability, and surgical complications were assessed. Changes in higher-order aberrations, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, dry eye signs, contrast sensitivity, and subjective glare symptoms were evaluated.

RESULTS

All 52 myopic patients in the initial treatment group completed the final 12-month follow-up. At 12 months, 90.4% of eyes were within ±0.5 diopters (D) of the intended refractive target. The mean (±SD) change in manifest refraction from 1 day to 12 months was -0.06 (±0.37) D. The uncorrected visual acuity was better than or equal to 20/20 in 83% of eyes; 98% of eyes had a best-corrected visual acuity of better than or equal to 20/20. No eye lost two or more Snellen lines. There was an increase in higher-order aberrations, spherical aberration, and coma postoperatively. No significant increase in intraocular pressure occurred. The tear breakup time decreased significantly after surgery and did not return to preoperative levels within 12 months. The log contrast sensitivity value with glare of 6.3, 4.0, 2.5, and 1.6 degrees of visual angle at 1 month was statistically significantly reduced but recovered to preoperative levels after 3 months. Twenty-seven percent of patients complained of mild or moderate glare postoperatively, but the symptoms disappeared during the 12-month follow-up period with no influence on daily life. No vision-threatening complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Small-incision lenticule extraction is a promising corneal refractive procedure to correct myopia.

Comparison of corneal shape changes and aberrations induced By FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia

PURPOSE

To compare corneal curvatures, corneal power calculations, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) following surgery for moderate to high myopia.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 736 eyes of 368 patients treated with SMILE and 148 eyes of 74 patients treated with FS-LASIK. Preoperative mean spherical equivalent was -7.3 ± 1.5 diopters in the SMILE group and -7.6 ± 1.3 diopters in the FS-LASIK group. Corneal curvatures, corneal power calculations performed by ray tracing, and HOAs measured with Scheimpflug technology before and 3 months after surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

Corneal curvatures changed significantly in the anterior corneal surface, but not in the posterior corneal surface, in both groups; after SMILE, the sagittal curvature was constant for the central 4-mm diameter, in contrast to FS-LASIK where the curvature showed a gradual steepening with increasing diameter. Corneal power calculations were different across the cornea depending on the measurement diameter between the two groups postoperatively. Measured over a 5-mm zone on the total cornea, FS-LASIK induced 0.11 µm more coma (P < .001) and 0.13 µm higher spherical aberration (P < .001) as compared to SMILE; similar results in other HOAs were seen for the anterior corneal surface. Negligible differences in HOAs were induced on the posterior corneal surface.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE and FS-LASIK produced distinct changes in anterior corneal shape evident in different postoperative corneal curvatures and power measurements between the two groups. Postoperative HOAs were much lower after SMILE as compared to FS-LASIK.

[SMILE: refractive lenticule extraction for myopic correction]

PURPOSE

It is currently possible to obtain refractive correction without using an excimer laser; the technique is called ReLEx(®) (Refractive Lenticule extraction) and uses the femtosecond laser VisuMax(®) (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). We present initial clinical experience with small-incision (4mm) lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the treatment of moderate to high myopia via a retrospective study of 106 myopic and astigmatic eyes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study of 106 eyes measures postoperative visual acuity to determine the safety, efficacy and predictability of the technique. For SMILE, an intrastromal lenticule is cut with the VisuMax(®) femtosecond laser; it is then dissected and detached from the anterior and posterior stromal planes and finally removed through a 4mm incision. This procedure does not require the creation of a flap. The study is based on 106 eyes of 54 patients who underwent the surgery for moderate to high myopia, with or without associated astigmatism. Patient selection was the same as for LASIK.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 33 ± 9 (20-54). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -6.22 ± 1.6 (-3; -9.75 D). The mean preoperative sphere was -5.88 D ± 1.52 (-3; -9.75 D) with a mean cylinder of -0.68 D ± 0.58 (0.00; -2.25). Postoperatively, 95% of patients had distance vision greater than or equal to 8/10. No loss of BCVA was noted. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.16 ± 0.35 D (-1.38; +0.88) with a mean sphere of 0.00 ± 0.34 D (-1,25; +1) and a mean cylinder of -0.31 ± 0.37 D (0; -1.5). One eye was converted to PRK because the incision site was covered by conjunctiva during the last 5 seconds of the laser phase.

CONCLUSION

SMILE is a predictable and safe technique for the surgical correction of moderate to high myopia.

Comparison of astigmatic correction after femtosecond lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative astigmatic correction between femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and wavefront-guided LASIK in eyes with myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Fifty-eight eyes of 41 patients undergoing FLEx and 49 eyes of 29 patients undergoing wavefront-guided LASIK to correct myopic astigmatism were examined. Visual acuity, cylindrical refraction, predictability of the astigmatic correction, and astigmatic vector components were compared between groups 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in manifest cylindrical refraction (P = .08) or percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of its refraction (P = .11) between the surgical procedures. The index of success in FLEx was statistically significantly better than that of wavefront-guided LASIK (P = .02), although there was no significant difference between the groups in other indices (eg, surgically induced astigmatism, target-induced astigmatism, astigmatic correction index, angle of error, difference vector, and flattening index). Subgroup analysis showed that FLEx had a better index of success (P = .02) and difference vector (P = .04) than wavefront-guided LASIK in the low cylinder subgroup; the angle of error in FLEx was significantly smaller than that of wavefront-guided LASIK in the moderate cylinder subgroup (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Both FLEx and wavefront-guided LASIK worked well for the correction of myopic astigmatism by the 6-month follow-up visit. Although FLEx had a better index of success than wavefront-guided LASIK when using vector analysis, it appears equivalent to wavefront-guided LASIK in terms of visual acuity and the correction of astigmatism.

Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the centration of the treatment zone after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and compare it to femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

Sixty-nine myopic eyes of 36 patients who underwent SMILE were compared to 69 myopic eyes of 36 patients treated with FS-LASIK. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the VisuMax platform (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). The Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for preoperative and postoperative topography and pachymetry. The centration of the treatment zone was estimated pachymetrically by the distance of the thickest point on the corneal thickness differential map from the topographical center of the entrance pupil and the coaxial corneal light reflex.

RESULTS

In SMILE cases, the mean decentration of the lenticule from the center of the entrance pupil was 0.326 ± 0.196 mm (range: 0.014 to 1.062 mm), whereas the distribution of the lenticule centers demonstrated a nasalization pattern. In FS-LASIK cases, this value was 0.452 ± 0.224 mm (range: 0.02 to 1.040 mm), whereas the ablation centers were distributed randomly. In relation to the coaxial corneal light reflex, the decentration in SMILE was 0.315 ± 0.211 mm (range: 0.0 to 1.131 mm), whereas FS-LASIK eyes demonstrated a mean decentration of 0.516 ± 0.254 mm (range: 0.103 to 1.265 mm). The decentration from the reference point of its technique (coaxial corneal light reflex in SMILE, the entrance pupil center in FS-LASIK) was significantly more extended in the FS-LASIK group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The centration of the treatment zone as measured by the Pentacam was better for patient-controlled fixation during SMILE than active eye tracker-assisted FS-LASIK.

Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study

Background

To report our experience with small incision lenticule extraction ("SMILE") for myopia treatment.

Methods

In this prospective clinical study, we evaluated 447 eyes from 224 patients with myopia, with and without astigmatism. We followed the patients for 6 months after SMILE.

Results

The mean (±standard deviation, SD) spherical equivalent was -6.75 ± 1.65 diopters (D) preoperatively and -0.21 ± 0.37 D at 6 months postoperatively. Our data showed that 97.9% of eyes were within ±1.0 D and 86.1% were within ±0.5 D of the intended correction. Furthermore, 79.8% had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 0 logMAR or less (20/20 or better in the Snellen equivalent) 6 months after surgery. Additionally, 48.5% remained unchanged, 41% gained one line of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), 7.2% gained two lines of CDVA, 3.3% lost one line of CDVA, and 0.3% lost two or more lines of CDVA. Age was the only predictor for worsening UDVA at 6 months postoperatively in linear regression analyses (0.07 decrease logMAR per increased 10 years of age; P < 0.05). No predictor showed an association with error in spherical equivalent refraction at 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

SMILE is an effective and safe refractive surgery. Age was the only predictor that influenced visual outcome, but its effect appeared clinically insignificant. Faster visual recovery is also expected with improved surgical technique.

Early changes in ocular surface and tear inflammatory mediators after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To characterize the early ocular-surface changes or tear inflammatory-mediators levels following small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

Forty-seven myopic subjects were recruited for this prospective study. Fifteen underwent ReLEx smile and thirty-two underwent FS-LASIK. Corneal fluorescein (FL) staining, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test (SIT), ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and central corneal sensitivity were evaluated in all participants. Tears were collected and analyzed for interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), nerve growth factor (NGF) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) levels using multiplex magnetic beads. All measurements were preformed preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

FL scores in ReLEx smile group were lower than those of FS-LASIK group 1 week postoperatively (P = 0.010). Compared to the FS-LASIK group, longer TBUT were observed in ReLEx smile group 1 month (P = 0.029) and 3 months (P = 0.045) postoperatively. No significant differences were found in tear secretion for the two groups (P>0.05). OSDI scores were higher in FS-LASIK group 1 month after surgery (P = 0.020). Higher central corneal sensitivity was observed in ReLEx smile group 1 week, 1 month and 3 months (P<0.05) postoperatively. Compared to FS-LASIK group, lower and faster recovery of IL-6 and NGF levels in tears was observed in ReLEx smile group postoperatively (P<0.05). Tears TNF-α and ICAM-1 concentrations were not significantly different between the two groups at any follow-up time (P>0.05). Moreover, IL-6 and NGF levels correlated with ocular surface changes after ReLEx smile or FS-LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

In the early postoperative period, ReLEx smile results in milder ocular surface changes than FS-LASIK. Furthermore, the tear inflammatory mediators IL-6 and NGF may play a crucial role in the ocular surface healing process following ReLEx smile and FS-LASIK.

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties modification after small incision lenticule extraction using Scheimpflug-based noncontact tonometer

PURPOSE

To quantify the effect of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on the corneal biomechanics using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometer (Corvis ST).

METHODS

Twenty eyes of twenty patients, evaluated as eligible for surgery, with high myopia and/or moderate myopic astigmatism, underwent small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). All patients underwent Corvis ST preoperatively and postoperatively after 1 week, and 1 and 3 months to observe alterations of corneal biomechanical properties. The main outcome measures were Deformation Amplitude, 1st-AT, and 2nd-AT. The relationship between the amount of stroma removed and the percentage variation of the measured parameters from baseline was evaluated with generalized linear model from each time point. For completeness also intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and their variations after surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

The ratio between the amount of removed refractive error and, respectively, changes of Deformation Amplitude, 1st-AT, and 2nd-AT were significantly modified at the 1st week after surgery (P = 0.005; P = 0.001; P = 0.024). At 1 and 3 months these values did not show statistically significant alterations. Intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness showed statistically significant changes during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant modifications in biomechanical properties were observed after SMILE so this procedure could induce only minimal transient alterations of corneal biomechanics.

Changes in corneal deformation parameters after lenticule creation and extraction during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure

Purpose

To investigate the effects of lenticule creation and subsequent corneal lenticule extraction on corneal deformation parameters during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective study, 18 eyes of 10 patients (27.90±7.11 years, −5.64±2.45 diopters) scheduled for SMILE procedure were enrolled. Changes in the corneal deformation parameters, including deformation amplitude (DA), applanation time(AT1 and AT2), applanation length(AL1 and AL2), corneal velocity(CV1 and CV2), peak distance(P.Dist.), radius and intraocular pressure values were measured preoperatively, immediately after lenticule creation and subsequent to corneal lenticule extraction in all eyes with the Corvis Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons was performed to investigate changes following each step of the procedure.

Results

All surgical procedures were uneventful. A significant difference was detected among the three time points (pre-operation, post-lenticule creation and post lenticule extraction) for AT1 (P<0.001), AT2 (P = 0.001), DA(P<0.001), and IOP(P = 0.002). Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc comparisons indicated that there was no significant change in AT1, AT2, DA, or IOP after lenticule creation (post hoc P>0.05), but there was a significant change in these parameters following subsequent corneal lenticule extraction (post hoc P<0.01), when compared to values obtained pre-operatively. The scheimpflug camera of the Corvis ST demonstrated the intralamellar small gas bubbles formed from the vaporisation of tissue after lenticule creation and a gray zone was observed between the cap and the residual stromal bed after lenticule extraction.

Conclusions

There is a significant change in corneal deformation parameters following SMILE procedure. The changes may be caused predominantly by stromal lenticule extraction, while lenticule creation with femtosecond laser may not have an obvious effect on corneal deformation properties.

Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches

PURPOSE

To discuss the various static and dynamic surgical approaches which attempt to give presbyopes good vision at far, intermediate and near viewing distances.

CONTENT

Static methods broadly adopt the same optical techniques as those used in presbyopic contact lens correction and aim to satisfy the needs of the presbyope by increasing binocular depth-of-focus, often using monovision as well as simultaneous-imagery. Dynamic methods generally attempt to make use of at least some of the still-active elements of the accommodation system. They include procedures which are supposed to modify the relative geometry of the ciliary muscle and lens, or which reduce the stiffness of the presbyopic lens either by replacing it with other natural or man-made material or by subjecting it to femtosecond laser treatment. Alternatively the natural lens may be replaced by some form of intraocular lens which changes power as a result of forces derived from the still-active ciliary muscle, zonule and capsule, or other sources.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, multifocal intraocular lenses appear to offer the most consistent and reliable surgical approach to surgical presbyopic correction. They have obvious advantages in convenience and stability over optically-similar, simultaneous-image presbyopic contact lenses but this must be balanced against their relative inflexibility in cases of patient dissatisfaction. Dynamic methods remain largely experimental. Although some approaches show promise, as yet no method has demonstrated a reliable, long-term ability to correct distance refractive error and to appropriately change ocular power in response to changes in viewing distance over the normal range of interest.

Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative visual acuity and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX) and after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

Medical records of refractive lenticule extraction patients were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty patients were treated with FLEX. A comparable group of 20 SMILE patients were retrospectively identified. Only one eye of each patient was randomly chosen for the study. Visual acuity, subjective manifest refraction and corneal topography before and 6 months after the surgery were analyzed for both groups. Total HOAs, spherical aberrations, coma and trefoil were calculated from topography data over the 4- and 6-mm-diameter central corneal zone.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative SE was -4.03 ± 1.61 in the SMILE group and -4.46 ± 1.61 in the FLEX group. One year after surgery, the mean SE was -0.33 ± 0.25 in the SMILE group and -0.31 ± 0.41 in the FLEX group (p=0.86). In the SMILE group a greater number of eyes were within ±0.50D of the target refraction (95% versus 75%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.18). Furthermore, 80% of FLEX eyes and 95% of SMILE eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better (p=0.34). Total HOAs, spherical aberration, coma and trefoil increased postoperatively in both groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups preoperatively and postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

FLEX and SMILE result in comparable refractive results. In addition, corneal aberrations induced by different techniques of lenticule extraction seemed similar to each other.

Corneal backscatter analysis by in vivo confocal microscopy: fellow eye comparison of small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK

Purpose. To evaluate and compare corneal backscatter from anterior stroma between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (femto-LASIK). Methods. A cohort of 60 eyes of 30 patients was randomized to receive SMILE in one eye and femto-LASIK in the fellow eye. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The main outcome measurements were maximum backscattered intensity and the depth from which it was measured, the backscattered light intensity 30  μ m below Bowman's membrane at the flap interface and 150  μ m below the superficial epithelium, and the number of refractive particles at the flap interface. Results. The mean backscattered light intensity (LI) at all measured depths and the maximum backscattered LI were higher in the SMILE group than the femto-LASIK group at all postoperative visits. LI differences at 1 week and 1- and 3-month visits were statistically significant (P < 0,05). LI differences at 6 months were not statistically significant. There was no difference in the number of refractive particles at the flap interface between the groups at any visit. Conclusions. SMILE results in increased backscattered LI in the anterior stroma when compared with femto-LASIK were evaluated.

Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction

Surgical correction of refractive errors is becoming increasingly popular. In the 1990s, the excimer laser revolutionized the field of corneal refractive surgery with PRK and LASIK, and lately refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) of intracorneal tissue, using only a femtosecond laser, has become possible. Two new procedures were developed, ReLEx flex (FLEX) and ReLEx smile (SMILE). Until this thesis, only a few long-term studies of PRK with a relatively limited number of patients had been published; therefore, this thesis intended to retrospectively evaluate long-term outcomes after PRK for all degrees of myopia for a large number of patients. Furthermore, a prospective contralateral eye study comparing FLEX and SMILE, when treating high to moderate degrees of myopia, had not been performed prior to this study. This was the second aim of this thesis. In the first study, results from 160 PRK patients (289 eyes) were presented. Preoperative spherical equivalent ranged from -1.25 to -20.25 D, with 78% having low myopia (<-6 D). Average follow-up time was 16 years (range 13-19 years), making this the longest published follow-up study on PRK patients. Outcomes from eyes with low myopia were generally superior to outcomes from eyes with high myopia, at final follow-up. Seventy-two percent were within ± 1.00 D of target refraction, as compared to 47% of eyes with high myopia. However, results from a subgroup of unilateral treated PRK patients indicated that refraction at final follow-up was affected by myopic progression. Fifty percent of eyes with low myopia had uncorrected 20/20 distance visual acuity or better, as compared to 22% of eyes with high myopia. Haze did not occur if attempted corrections were <-4 D, and only eyes with high myopia lost two lines or more of CDVA (corrected distance visual acuity). Eighty-one per cent were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery.

CONCLUSION

The results support the continued use of the excimer laser for corneal surface ablation as a treatment option for correction of low degrees of myopia, and as the treatment of choice for subgroups of refractive patients (thin corneas, etc.). The results also highlight that treatment of higher degrees of myopia with standard PRK should only be done today under special circumstances, due to low refractive predictability, and high risk of corneal haze. Technological advances since then should be taken into account when comparing these results with contemporary techniques. In the second study, 35 patients were randomized to receive FLEX in one eye and SMILE in the other. Preoperative spherical equivalent refraction ranged from -6 to -10 D with low degrees of astigmatism. A total of 34 patients completed the 6 month follow-up period. Refractive and visual outcomes were very similar for the two methods, as well as tear film measurements and changes in corneal biomechanics. Ninety-seven percent were within ± 1.00 D of target refraction, no eyes lost two lines or more of CDVA, and contrast sensitivity was unaffected after both procedures. The changes in higher-order aberrations were also very similar. There were also no differences in tear film parameters 6 months after surgery, although less postoperative foreign body sensation was reported within the first week after surgery in SMILE eyes. Corneal sublayer pachymetry measurements demonstrated equally increased epithelial thickness 6 months after surgery. Contrary to expectations, it was not possible to measure the theoretical biomechanical advantages of a small corneal incision in SMILE as compared to a corneal flap in FLEX. The main differences between FLEX and SMILE were found when the corneal nerves and intraoperative complications were evaluated. Thus, corneal sensitivity was better preserved and corneal nerve morphology was less affected after SMILE, but intraoperative complications occurred more frequently, although without visual sequela. Finally, 97% were satisfied or very satisfied with both their surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The results support the continued use of both FLEX and SMILE for treatment of up to high degrees of myopia. Overall, refractive and visual results for both procedures were good and similar, but from a biological point of view, the less invasive SMILE technique is more attractive, as demonstrated in this study, despite being slightly more surgically demanding than FLEX.

Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with myopia.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison.

METHODS

This study evaluated 52 eyes of 26 consecutive patients with spherical equivalents of -4.19 ± 1.65 diopters (D) (mean ± standard deviation) who underwent FLEx in 1 eye and SMILE in the other eye by randomized assignment. Before surgery, and 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, we assessed safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events of the 2 surgical techniques.

RESULTS

LogMAR uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity was, respectively, -0.17 ± 0.10, -0.20 ± 0.07 in the FLEx group and -0.15 ± 0.10, -0.19 ± 0.07 in the SMILE group 6 months postoperatively. In the FLEx and SMILE groups 6 months postoperatively, 96% and 100% of eyes, respectively, were within 0.5 D of the targeted spherical equivalent correction. Changes of -0.02 ± 0.39 D and 0.00 ± 0.30 D occurred in manifest refraction from 1 week to 6 months in the FLEx and SMILE groups, respectively. No clinically significant complications occurred in the FLEx or the SMILE group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both FLEx and SMILE performed well in the correction of myopia throughout the 6-month observation period. FLEx may be essentially equivalent to SMILE in terms of safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability, suggesting that the presence or absence of lifting the flap does not significantly affect these visual and refractive outcomes.

LASIK following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule re-implantation: a feasibility study of a novel method for treatment of presbyopia

Presbyopia remains a major visual impairment for patients, who have previously undergone laser refractive correction and enjoyed unaided distance vision prior to the onset of presbyopia. Corneal stromal volume restoration through small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule re-implantation presents an opportunity for restoring the patients’ non-dominant eye to previous low myopia to achieve a monovision. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of performing LASIK after lenticule re-implantation as a method to create presbyopic monovision. A -6.00D SMILE correction was performed in 9 rabbit eyes. The lenticules were cryopreserved for 14 days and re-implanted. Five weeks later, 3 of these eyes underwent LASIK for -5.00D correction (RL group); 3 underwent LASIK flap creation, which was not lifted (RN); and no further procedures were performed on the remaining 3 eyes. These groups were compared with 3 eyes that underwent standard LASIK for a -5.00D correction (LO); 3 that underwent creation of non-lifted flap (LN); and 3 non-operated eyes. Rabbits were euthanized 1 day post-surgery. Tissue responses were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, slit lamp and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). Intrastromal irregularities and elevated reflectivity levels of the excimer-ablated plane were observed on slit lamp and IVCM, respectively in the RL group. The results were comparable (P = 0.310) to IVCM findings in the LO group. RL and LO groups showed similar fibronectin expression levels, number of CD11b-positive cells (P = 0.304) and apoptotic cells (P = 0.198). There was no difference between the RN and LN groups in reflectivity levels (P = 0.627), fibronectin expression levels, CD11b-positive cells (P = 0.135) and apoptotic cells (P = 0.128). LASIK can be performed following lenticule re-implantation to create presbyopic monovision. The tissue responses elicited after performing LASIK on corneas that have undergone SMILE and subsequent lenticule re-implantation are similar to primary procedure.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation

Aim

To evaluate and compare early corneal wound healing and inflammatory responses after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus femtosecond laser laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Methods

Thirty-six eyes of 36 rabbits underwent SMILE, while another 36 eyes of 36 rabbits were treated with femtosecond laser LASIK. All the eyes were subjected to the same refractive correction of −6.00 DS/−1.00 DC. Twelve eyes that had no surgery were included for control. After euthanisation, corneal tissue sections were evaluated with terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-digoxigenin nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay to detect apoptosis at postoperative 4 and 24 h, immunocytochemistry for Ki67 to detect keratocyte proliferation at postoperative day 3, week 1 and month 1, and immunocytochemistry for CD11b to detect inflammation at postoperative day 1, day 3 and week 1, respectively.

Results

No adverse effects were noted after SMILE or LASIK. Corneal healing postoperatively was uneventful in all cases. There were significantly fewer TUNEL-positive corneal stromal cells after the SMILE procedure at 4 and 24 h postoperatively (p<0.01) compared with the LASIK procedure. In addition, immunocytochemistry showed significantly fewer Ki67-positive cells in the SMILE group than those in the femtosecond laser LASIK group at day 3 and week 1 postoperatively (p<0.05), but there was little expression of Ki67 at month 1 postoperatively in both groups. The CD11b-positive cells were significantly fewer in the SMILE group at day 1, day 3 and week 1 postoperatively (p<0.01).

Conclusions

SMILE induces less keratocyte apoptosis, proliferation and inflammation compared with femtosecond laser LASIK.

Time course of optical quality and intraocular scattering after refractive lenticule extraction

Purpose

To assess the time course of optical quality and intraocular scattering in relation to visual acuity after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) for the correction of myopia.

Methods

This study evaluated 36 eyes of 36 patients with spherical equivalents of −4.38±1.53 D [mean ± standard deviation] who underwent FLEx. Before surgery, and 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, we assessed the modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, objective scattering index (OSI), and OQAS values (OVs), using a double-pass instrument. We also investigated the relationship of the OSI with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results

The mean changes in MTF cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, OSI, OV100%, OV20%, and OV9% preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively were −5.51±15.01, −0.03±0.07, 0.35±0.83, −0.17±0.48, −0.14±0.38, and −0.09±0.22, respectively. We found no significant preoperative correlation between the OSI and logMAR CDVA (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = 0.068, p = 0.69), and modest, but significant correlations 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (r = 0.572, r = 0.562, r = 0.542, r = 0.540, p<0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

FLEx induced a transient decrease in optical quality in association with an increase in intraocular scattering in the early postoperative period, possibly due to mild interface haze formation, but gradually recovered with time. It is suggested that this transient degradation in optical quality related to an increase in the intraocular scattering may result in a slight delay of CDVA recovery in the early postoperative period.

The morphology of corneal cap and its relation to refractive outcomes in femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with anterior segment optical coherence tomography observation

Purpose

To investigate the morphology of corneal caps in femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and its relation to the refractive outcomes.

Methods

A prospective study of fifty-four corneal caps created with VisuMax femtosecond laser were examined using an Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after SMILE. The cap thickness at nine points on each of the four meridians (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°) and the diameter were measured. Cap morphology, changes over time and its correlation with refractive outcomes were assessed.

Results

The mean achieved central cap thickness were (108.74±5.06) µm at 6 months and (107.32±4.81 ) µm at 1 month postoperatively, significantly thinner than that at 1 day (110.81±7.95) µm and 1 week (109.58±7.48 ) µm (P<0.05). The mean diameter on 0° meridian was (7.61±0.07) mm, significantly larger than that on 90° meridian (7.57±0.06) mm (P = 0.001). Cap morphology showed good regularity, except that the differences of points in two pairs were significant at 1 day postoperatively. The uniformity was consistent over time and the central cap thickness was thinner than those in the paracentral and peripheral areas. The refractive outcomes stabilized within 1 month. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was correlated to the central cap thickness at 1 day and 1 week (both r_s = 0.33, p<0.05). The uniformity index was correlated with UDVA (r_s = 0.34, p<0.05) and corrected distance visual acuity (r_s = 0.32, p<0.05) at 1 week postoperatively.

Conclusions

Corneal caps of SMILE are predictable with good reproducibility, regularity and uniformity. Cap morphology might have a mild effect on refractive outcomes in the early stage. Further study should focus on the impact on the visual quality.

Reversible femtosecond laser-assisted myopia correction: a non-human primate study of lenticule re-implantation after refractive lenticule extraction

LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) is a common laser refractive procedure for myopia and astigmatism, involving permanent removal of anterior corneal stromal tissue by excimer ablation beneath a hinged flap. Correction of refractive error is achieved by the resulting change in the curvature of the cornea and is limited by central corneal thickness, as a thin residual stromal bed may result in biomechanical instability of the cornea. A recently developed alternative to LASIK called Refractive Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx) utilizes solely a femtosecond laser (FSL) to incise an intrastromal refractive lenticule (RL), which results in reshaping the corneal curvature and correcting the myopia and/or astigmatism. As the RL is extracted intact in the ReLEx, we hypothesized that it could be cryopreserved and re-implanted at a later date to restore corneal stromal volume, in the event of keratectasia, making ReLEx a potentially reversible procedure, unlike LASIK. In this study, we re-implanted cryopreserved RLs in a non-human primate model of ReLEx. Mild intrastromal haze, noted during the first 2 weeks after re-implantation, subsided after 8 weeks. Refractive parameters including corneal thickness, anterior curvature and refractive error indices were restored to near pre-operative values after the re-implantation. Immunohistochemistry revealed no myofibroblast formation or abnormal collagen type I expression after 8 weeks, and a significant attenuation of fibronectin and tenascin expression from week 8 to 16 after re-implantation. In addition, keratocyte re-population could be found along the implanted RL interfaces. Our findings suggest that RL cryopreservation and re-implantation after ReLEx appears feasible, suggesting the possibility of potential reversibility of the procedure, and possible future uses of RLs in treating other corneal disorders and refractive errors.

Subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensation, and tear film evaluation after refractive femtosecond laser lenticule extraction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare corneal subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensation, and tear film parameters after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, single-masked, paired-eye design clinical trial of 35 patients treated for moderate to high myopia with FLEX in one eye and SMILE in the other. In both techniques, an intrastromal lenticule was cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted. In FLEX, a LASIK-like flap allowed removal of the lenticule, whereas in SMILE, it was removed through a small incision. In-vivo confocal microscopy was used to acquire images of the central corneal subbasal nerve plexus, from which nerve density, total nerve number, and nerve tortuosity were analyzed. Corneal sensation was measured using Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry. A visual analog scale, tear osmolarity, non-invasive tear film break-up time (keratograph) tear meniscus height (anterior segment OCT), Schirmer's test, and fluorescein tear film break-up time were used to evaluate tear film and ocular surface symptoms. Patients were examined before and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in baseline parameters between FLEX and SMILE (p > 0.050). With regard to changes from before to 6 months after surgery, mean reduction in subbasal nerve density was 14.22 ± 6.24 mm/mm(2) in FLEX eyes, and 9.21 ± 7.80 mm/mm(2) in SMILE eyes (p < 0.05). The total number of nerves decreased more in FLEX eyes than in SMILE eyes (p < 0.05). No change was found when comparing tortuosity (p > 0.05). Corneal sensation was reduced with 0.38 ± 0.49 cm in FLEX eyes, and 0.10 ± 0.34 cm in SMILE eyes (p < 0.01). No differences were found between FLEX and SMILE in tear film evaluation tests (p > 0.05). Significantly more patients felt postoperative foreign body sensation in the FLEX eye within the first days after surgery, as compared to the SMILE eye.

CONCLUSIONS

Six months after surgery, the less invasive SMILE technique seemed better at sparing the central corneal nerves as compared to FLEX. Corneal sensation was only significantly reduced in FLEX eyes. There were no differences between FLEX and SMILE when comparing tear film evaluation tests 6 months after surgery.

Femtosecond lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: a 6 month follow-up study

Aims

To report our initial experience with femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX) compared with femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Settings and design

This was a prospective pilot study carried out at the Refractive Surgery Department of the Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Materials and methods

Surgery was performed on both eyes of 14 consecutive patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. Patients underwent FLEX in one eye and femtosecond LASIK (FemtoLASIK) in the other eye. The primary outcome was based on uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, and spherical equivalent of the subjective manifest refraction, at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postsurgery. Statistical analyses were performed using PAWS Statistics 18. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to compare the groups.

Results

During the last follow-up visit (6 months postsurgery), the mean spherical was −0.37 ± 0.60 diopters (D) (range −1.00 to 0.50) (P < 0.001) and −0.25 ± 0.41 D (range −0.88 to 0.12 D) (P < 0.001) in the FLEX and FemtoLASIK eyes, respectively. The spherical was within ± 0.50 D of the intended correction in ten (72%) of the FLEX eyes and 12 (86%) of the FemtoLASIK eyes (P > 0.05). No complications occurred during surgery or the postoperative period.

Conclusion

FLEX is a safe, effective, and predictable procedure for surgical correction of myopia. Refractive results were stabilized within the first postoperative week, and visual acuities were stabilized within the first month, comparable to FemtoLASIK.

Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To present our initial clinical experience with ReLEx(®) flex (ReLEx) for moderate to high myopia. We compare efficacy, safety and corneal higher-order aberrations after ReLEx with femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

Prospective study of ReLEx compared with a retrospective study of FS-LASIK. ReLEx is a new keratorefractive procedure, where a stromal lenticule is cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted. Forty patients were treated with ReLEx on both eyes. A comparable group of 41 FS-LASIK patients were retrospectively identified. Visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE) and corneal tomography were measured before and 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Preoperative SE averaged -7.50 ± 1.16 D (ReLEx) and -7.32 ± 1.09 D (FS-LASIK). For all eyes, mean corrected distance visual acuity remained unchanged in both groups. For eyes with emmetropia as target refraction, 41% of ReLEx and 61% of FS-LASIK eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of logMAR ≤ 0.10 at day 1 after surgery, increasing to, respectively, 88% and 69% at 3 months. Mean SE was -0.06 ± 0.35 D 3 months after ReLEx and -0.53 ± 0.60 D after FS-LASIK. The proportion of eyes within ±1.00 D after 3 months was 100% (ReLEx) and 85% (FS-LASIK). For a 6.0-mm pupil, corneal spherical aberrations increased significantly less in ReLEx than FS-LASIK eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

ReLEx is an all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive procedure, and in this study, results were comparable to FS-LASIK. Refractive predictability and corneal aberrations at 3 months seemed better than or equal to FS-LASIK, whereas visual recovery after ReLEx was slower.

Effect of different femtosecond laser-firing patterns on collagen disruption during refractive lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes in corneal collagen architecture subjected to different laser-firing patterns during refractive lenticule extraction.

SETTING

Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

METHODS

Refractive lenticule extraction was performed in rabbits without lenticule removal. Rabbits were divided into 4 groups that had incisions in the following firing patterns: (A) from periphery in (lenticule's posterior surface) and from center out (lenticule's anterior surface); (B) from center out and from center out; (C) from periphery in and from periphery in; and (D) from center out and from periphery in. The corneas were collected 18 hours postoperatively and were subjected to immunofluorescent staining of fibronectin, CD11b, and collagen type I. Ultrastructural analysis was performed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

RESULTS

Refractive lenticule extraction-treated corneas showed no significant difference in fibronectin and CD11b expression. Similar expression patterns of collagen type I were observed in corneas that had femtosecond firing patterns A, B, and C; however, a discontinuous and relatively more intense staining pattern along the anterior plane of the lenticule was detected in corneas treated with pattern D. The TEM also showed a more disrupted collagen arrangement along the anterior incision site in pattern D-treated corneas.

CONCLUSIONS

Differential laser firing patterns during refractive lenticule extraction resulted in different levels of collagen derangement along the anterior plane of the lenticule, with pattern D showing the most disrupted surface. Such disruption in the collagen architecture might affect postoperative visual recovery and refractive outcomes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.