51
|
Abstract
The significance of BRAF mutations in neoplasia was first recognized in 2002 when mutations were discovered in a broad range of cancers. Numerous subsequent studies expanded our understanding of BRAF V600E as a critical diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarker in many cancers. Additionally, the advent of small-molecule inhibitors of BRAF V600E rendered assessment of BRAF mutation status essential in tumors such as melanoma. In clinical practice, evaluation of BRAF mutation status has routinely been performed by DNA-based assays utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR). However, molecular testing is not available at many hospitals since it is time-consuming, expensive, and requires expertise in molecular techniques. The first BRAF V600E-specific antibody was reported in 2011 (clone VE1). A purified version of this antibody as well as a second monoclonal antibody targeted to BRAF V600E is now commercially available. In this review, clinicopathologic characteristics associated with BRAF-mutant tumors will be highlighted, and the prognostic and predictive implications of a BRAF V600E mutation will be discussed with a focus on melanoma, thyroid carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma. Additionally, we will review the correlation between immunohistochemistry and molecular results and deliberate how BRAF immunohistochemistry might be utilized in the evaluation of these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren L Ritterhouse
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Justine A Barletta
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women׳s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Thiel A, Moza M, Kytölä S, Orpana A, Jahkola T, Hernberg M, Virolainen S, Ristimäki A. Prospective immunohistochemical analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma. Hum Pathol 2015; 46:169-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Revised: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 08/24/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
53
|
Abstract
The serrated pathway (SP) can be viewed as two parallel, but partially overlapping, arrays of colorectal precursor lesions, and their respective endpoint carcinomas, that are distinct from those of the conventional adenoma-carcinoma sequence (APC-pathway). In this review we focus at the outset on the clinical impact, pathological features, molecular genetics and biological behaviours of the various SP cancers. Then we summarize the clinicopathological features, classification and molecular profiles of the two main precursor lesions that anchor the respective pathways: (i) sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), also called sessile serrated lesion (SSL), and (ii) traditional serrated adenoma (TSA). Activating mutations of the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway initiate and sustain the lesions of the SP, and CpG island methylation of the promoter regions of tumour suppressor and DNA repair genes play the major role in their neoplastic progression. The SP includes microsatellite stable (MSS) carcinomas that are among the most biologically aggressive colorectal carcinomas (CRC), and also accounts for the great preponderance of sporadic hypermutated, mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient or microsatellite instable (MSI) CRC. The identification, removal and appropriate classification of at-risk SP precursors and surveillance of individuals who harbour these lesions present a challenge and opportunity for CRC prevention and mortality reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J O'Brien
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Bartley AN, Hamilton SR. Select biomarkers for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: present and future. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014; 139:457-68. [PMID: 25333834 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0189-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Advances in molecular biomarkers of the gastrointestinal tract have contributed to a decline in the incidence of and mortality from diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. The discovery and clinical validation of new biomarkers are important to personalized cancer therapy, and numerous clinical trials are currently ongoing to help identify individualized therapy affecting these biomarkers and molecular mechanisms they represent. Distinct molecular pathways leading to cancers of the colorectum, esophagus, stomach, small bowel, and pancreas have been identified. Using biomarkers in these pathways to direct patient care, including selection of proper molecular testing for identification of actionable mutations and reporting the results of these biomarkers to guide clinicians and genetic counselors, is paramount. OBJECTIVE To examine and review select clinically actionable biomarkers of the colon, esophagus, stomach, small bowel, and pancreas, including present and future biomarkers with relevant clinical trials. DATA SOURCES Extensive literature review and practical and consultation experience of the authors. CONCLUSIONS Although numerous biomarkers have been identified and are currently guiding patient therapy, few have shown evidence of clinical utility in the management of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Inconsistent results and discordant proposed algorithms for testing were identified throughout the literature; however, the potential for biomarkers to improve outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal cancer remains high. Continued advances through high-quality studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela N Bartley
- From Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Pathology, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ypsilanti, Michigan (Dr Bartley); and the Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (Dr Hamilton)
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Nummela P, Saarinen L, Thiel A, Järvinen P, Lehtonen R, Lepistö A, Järvinen H, Aaltonen LA, Hautaniemi S, Ristimäki A. Genomic profile of pseudomyxoma peritonei analyzed using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Int J Cancer 2014; 136:E282-9. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Revised: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pirjo Nummela
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Lilli Saarinen
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Alexandra Thiel
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Petrus Järvinen
- Department of Surgery; Helsinki University Central Hospital; Helsinki Finland
- Department of Urology; Helsinki University Central Hospital; Helsinki Finland
| | - Rainer Lehtonen
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Anna Lepistö
- Department of Surgery; Helsinki University Central Hospital; Helsinki Finland
| | - Heikki Järvinen
- Department of Surgery; Helsinki University Central Hospital; Helsinki Finland
| | - Lauri A Aaltonen
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
- Department of Medical Genetics; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Sampsa Hautaniemi
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Genome-Scale Biology Research Program, Research Programs Unit; University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
- Division of Pathology and Genetics; HUSLAB and Haartman Institute, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in colon carcinoma: critical evaluation of the imunohistochemical approach. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38:1235-41. [PMID: 24832158 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Recently BRAF V600E mutant-specific antibody (clone VE1) became available to immunohistochemically pinpoint the occurrence of these BRAF-mutant proteins in different tumors, such as colon carcinoma. Detection of BRAF mutations is important for the accurate application of targeted therapy against BRAF serine-threonine kinase activation. In this study, we evaluated 113 colon carcinomas including 95 primary and 27 metastatic tumors with the VE1 antibody using Leica Bond-Max automated immunohistochemistry. To ensure comprehensive BRAF V600E mutation detection, all cases were evaluated using 4 molecular methods (Sanger sequencing, the Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test, BRAF V600 allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, and BRAF V600 quantitative polymerase chain reaction) with nearly 100% concordance. Molecular and immunohistochemical studies were blinded. Furthermore, all cases were evaluated for KRAS and NRAS mutations as parameters mutually exclusive with BRAF mutations offering parallel evidence for BRAF mutation status. Strong to moderate VE1 positivity was seen in 34 tumors. Twelve colon carcinomas showed weak VE1 immunohistochemical staining, and 67 were entirely negative. An identical c.1799T>A single nucleotide substitution leading to the BRAF V600E mutation was identified in 27 of 113 (24%) colon carcinomas. A majority of BRAF-mutant tumors were located in the right side of the colon and had mismatch-repair deficiency. V600E mutation-negative carcinomas were more often sigmoid tumors and usually showed intact mismatch-repair proteins and KRAS or NRAS mutations. The sensitivity and specificity of positive results (strong to moderate staining) of VE1 immunohistochemistry were 85% and 68%, respectively. If any positivity would be considered, then the specificity declined to 51% with no significant improvement of sensitivity. Therefore, only strong positivity should be considered when using the VE1 antibody and Leica Bond-Max automated immunohistochemistry with these parameters. Although VE1 antibody can be useful in the screening of colon carcinomas for BRAF V600E-mutant proteins, molecular genetic confirmation is always necessary for mutation diagnosis.
Collapse
|
57
|
Kraus C, Rau TT, Lux P, Erlenbach-Wünsch K, Löhr S, Krumbiegel M, Thiel CT, Stöhr R, Agaimy A, Croner RS, Stürzl M, Hohenberger W, Hartmann A, Reis A. Comprehensive screening for mutations associated with colorectal cancer in unselected cases reveals penetrant and nonpenetrant mutations. Int J Cancer 2014; 136:E559-68. [PMID: 25142776 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2014] [Revised: 07/17/2014] [Accepted: 07/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Germline mutation testing in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is offered only to a subset of patients with a clinical presentation or tumor histology suggestive of familial CRC syndromes, probably underestimating familial CRC predisposition. The aim of our study was to determine whether unbiased screening of newly diagnosed CRC cases with next generation sequencing (NGS) increases the overall detection rate of germline mutations. We analyzed 152 consecutive CRC patients for germline mutations in 18 CRC-associated genes using NGS. All patients were also evaluated for Bethesda criteria and all tumors were investigated for microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins and the BRAF*V600E somatic mutation. NGS based sequencing identified 27 variants in 9 genes in 23 out of 152 patients studied (18%). Three of them were already reported as pathogenic and 12 were class 3 germline variants with an uncertain prediction of pathogenicity. Only 1 of these patients fulfilled Bethesda criteria and had a microsatellite instable tumor and an MLH1 germline mutation. The others would have been missed with current approaches: 2 with a MSH6 premature termination mutation and 12 uncertain, potentially pathogenic class 3 variants in APC, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MSH3 and MLH3. The higher NGS mutation detection rate compared with current testing strategies based on clinicopathological criteria is probably due to the large genetic heterogeneity and overlapping clinical presentation of the various CRC syndromes. It can also identify apparently nonpenetrant germline mutations complicating the clinical management of the patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Kraus
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Luey N, Toon CW, Sioson L, Clarkson A, Watson N, Cussigh C, Kedziora A, Pincott S, Pillinger S, Evans J, Percy J, Engel A, Schnitzler M, Gill AJ. A further investigation of combined mismatch repair and BRAFV600E mutation specific immunohistochemistry as a predictor of overall survival in colorectal carcinoma. PLoS One 2014; 9:e106105. [PMID: 25153715 PMCID: PMC4143358 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutation specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a promising new technique to detect the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). When performed in conjunction with mismatch repair (MMR) IHC, BRAFV600E IHC can help to further triage genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome. In a cohort of 1426 patients undergoing surgery from 2004 to 2009 we recently demonstrated that the combination of MMR and BRAFV600E IHC holds promise as a prognostic marker in CRC, particularly because of its ability to identify the poor prognosis MMR proficient (MMRp) BRAFV600E mutant subgroup. We attempted to validate combined MMR and BRAFV600E IHC as a prognostic indicator in a separate cohort comprising consecutive CRC patients undergoing surgery from 1998 to 2003. IHC was performed on a tissue microarray containing tissue from 1109 patients with CRC. The 5 year survivals stratified by staining patterns were: MMRd/BRAFwt 64%, MMRd/BRAFV600E 64%, MMRp/BRAFwt 60% and MMRp/BRAFV600E 53%. Using the poor prognosis MMRp/BRAFV600E phenotype as baseline, univariate Cox regression modelling demonstrated the following hazard ratios for death: MMRd/BRAFwt HR = 0.71 (95%CI = 0.40–1.27), p = 0.31; MMRd/BRAFV600E HR = 0.74 (95%CI = 0.51–1.07), p = 0.11 and MMRp/BRAFwt HR = 0.79 (95%CI = 0.60–1.04), p = 0.09. Although the findings did not reach statistical significance, this study supports the potential role of combined MMR and BRAF IHC as prognostic markers in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Luey
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher W. Toon
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Histopath Pathology, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Vital Translational Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Highway, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Loretta Sioson
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Adele Clarkson
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Histopath Pathology, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole Watson
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Carmen Cussigh
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Kedziora
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Stuart Pincott
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen Pillinger
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Justin Evans
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - John Percy
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander Engel
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Vital Translational Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Highway, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret Schnitzler
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony J. Gill
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Vital Translational Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Pacific Highway, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry in conjunction with mismatch repair status predicts survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol 2014; 27:644-50. [PMID: 24157612 PMCID: PMC4021849 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Revised: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 09/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry has recently been validated for the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation across a range of tumor types. In colorectal carcinoma, the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation can be used to virtually exclude Lynch syndrome in mismatch repair-deficient tumors. In mismatch repair-proficient tumors, BRAFV600E mutation assessed by molecular methods has been proposed as a poor prognostic factor. We investigated whether combined BRAFV600E and mismatch repair status assessment by immunohistochemistry alone can be used as a prognostic marker in the routine clinical setting. We performed immunohistochemistry for BRAFV600E, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 on 1426 consecutive unselected colorectal carcinomas. Ninety-one (6.4%) carcinomas were mismatch repair-proficient and BRAFV600E mutant, and these tumors demonstrated a significantly worse 5-year survival of 49.7% compared with mismatch repair-proficient BRAF wild type (74.1% of tumors, 65.4% survival), mismatch repair-deficient BRAFV600E mutant (12.9% of tumors, 70.1% survival), and mismatch repair-deficient BRAF wild type (6.6% of tumors, 73.6% survival). The poor survival was confirmed by univariate analysis (P<0.01) but fell away in multivariate analysis (P=0.68) because of the strong effect of tumor stage and age on overall survival. We conclude that in addition to its utility in screening for Lynch syndrome, reflex BRAFV600E and mismatch repair assessment by immunohistochemistry can be used as a powerful predictor of all-cause survival.
Collapse
|
60
|
VE1 immunohistochemistry accurately detects BRAF V600E mutations in colorectal carcinoma and can be utilized in the detection of poorly differentiated colorectal serrated adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch 2014; 464:637-43. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1555-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2013] [Revised: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
61
|
Thiel A, Ristimäki A. Toward a Molecular Classification of Colorectal Cancer: The Role of BRAF. Front Oncol 2013; 3:281. [PMID: 24298448 PMCID: PMC3828559 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2013] [Accepted: 10/31/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Different genetic aberrations of BRAF have been reported in various malignancies. BRAF is member of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and constitutive activity of this pathway can lead to increased cellular growth, invasion, and metastasis. The most common activating BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer is the V600E mutation, which is present in 5–15% of all tumors, and up to 80% of tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI) harbor this mutation. BRAF mutation is associated with proximal location, higher age, female gender, MSI-H, high grade, and mucinous histology, and is a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. The role of BRAF mutation as a predictive marker in respect of EGFR targeted treatments is controversial. BRAF V600 selective inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of V600 mutation positive metastatic melanoma, but the response rates in colorectal cancer are poor. This might be due to innate resistance mechanisms of colorectal cancers against the treatment solely targeting BRAF. To overcome resistance the combination of treatments, simultaneous inhibition of BRAF and MEK or PI3K/mTOR, might emerge as a successful therapeutic concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Thiel
- Division of Pathology, HUSLAB and Haartman Institute, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland ; Genome-Scale Biology, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|