Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity

Endoscopic Evaluation of Symptomatic Patients following Bariatric Surgery: A Literature Review

Obesity is an epidemic in our society, and rates continue to rise, along with comorbid conditions associated with obesity. Unfortunately, obesity remains refractory to behavioral and drug therapy but has shown response to bariatric surgery. Not only can long-term weight loss be achieved, but a majority of patients have also shown improvement of the comorbid conditions associated with obesity. A rise in the use of surgical therapy for management of obesity presents a challenge with an increased number of patients with problems after bariatric surgery. It is important to be familiar with symptoms following bariatric surgery, such as nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, dysphagia, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding and to utilize appropriate available tests for upper gastrointestinal tract pathology in the postoperative period.

Utility of routine versus selective upper gastrointestinal series to detect anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

In up to 4% of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures, anastomotic leaks occur. Early detection of gastrointestinal leakage is important for successful treatment. Consequently, many centers advocate routine postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of this practice after LRYGB.

METHODS

Eight hundred four consecutive patients undergoing LRYGB from June 2000 to April 2010 were analyzed prospectively. The first 382 patients received routine UGI series between the third and fifth postoperative days (group A). Thereafter, the test was only performed when clinical findings (tachycardia, fever, and drainage content) were suspicious for a leak of the gastrointestinal anastomosis (group B; n = 422).

RESULTS

Overall, nine of 804 (1.1%) patients suffered from leaks at the gastroenterostomy. In group A, four of 382 (1%) patients had a leak, but only two were detected by the routine UGI series. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 50%. In group B, the sensitivity was higher with 80%. Specificities were comparable with 97% and 91%, respectively. Routine UGI series cost only 1.6% of the overall costs of a non-complicated gastric bypass procedure. With this leak rate and sensitivity, US $86,800 would have to be spent on 200 routine UGI series to find one leak which is not justified.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that routine UGI series have a low sensitivity for the detection of anastomotic leaks after LRYGB. In most cases, the diagnosis is initiated by clinical findings. Therefore, routine upper gastrointestinal series are of limited value for the diagnosis of a leak.

Gastric leak after sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of its management

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is increasingly being performed and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has proved to be effective and safe. Among its complications, leaks are the most serious and life threatening.

METHODS

The focus of the study is nine patients who underwent a SG and developed a gastric leak after surgery. Our data were obtained from the clinical charts of the patients and through interviews with the surgeon who performed the index surgery.

RESULTS

Eight patients underwent SG at outside institutions while one was operated at Clinica Alemana. Three patients developed symptoms within 5 days after surgery, while the rest were diagnosed after 10 days from the surgery. A CT scan was the method used to confirm the diagnosis in all patients. The three patients who had a leak detected during the immediate postoperative period underwent laparoscopic reoperation. Among the rest of the patients, percutaneous drainage was employed in one patient as the primary procedure while the other underwent surgical drainage. An esophageal endoluminal stent was employed in four patients. The leak closed in all patients with the healing time ranging from 21 to 240 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of a leak after a SG required a greater index of suspicion in order to perform an early diagnosis. Sepsis control and nutritional support are the cornerstones of this treatment. Evolution is characterized by longer periods of time that are necessary in order to wait until the leak closes. Management must be tailored to each patient.

Effects of CPAP on gastric pouch pressure after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine if the routine use of postoperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with an increase in transmural gastric pouch pressure, which may create the risk for anastomotic leak.

METHODS

Transmural gastric pressures (difference between gastric pouch and bladder pressures) were measured postoperatively [post-anesthesia recovery care unit (PACU) arrival (prior to initiation of CPAP), 5 min, 30 min, and PACU discharge] in 28 patients (19 patients used CPAP, 9 patients did not) following laparoscopic RYGB. Changes in pressure over time were assessed using a generalized estimating equation, taking into account the repeated measurements obtained for each subject. In all cases, two-tailed P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among patients that used CPAP, there were no changes in transmural pouch pressure from baseline at any point in time (P = 0.628). However, in patients that did not use CPAP, there was a trend towards increased transmural gastric/pouch pressure (P = 0.053), which could be attributed to a transient decrease in bladder pressure at the 5-min measurement interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of CPAP did not increase transmural gastric pouch pressure in our bariatric patients; therefore, its use in the post-RYGB patients does not pose a risk for pouch distension, which could lead to the disruption of anastomotic integrity.

Routine upper gastrointestinal imaging is superior to clinical signs for detecting gastrojejunal leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

There are myriad symptoms and signs of gastrojejunal leak; prompt recognition is essential. Many surgeons use clinical predictors to guide selective use of upper gastrointestinal imaging (UGI). The appropriate practice remains undefined.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between January 2002 and December 2008 was conducted. All underwent routine UGI studies on postoperative day 1. Actual gastrojejunal leak within 7 days of surgery (actual leak [AL], radiologic leaks), operative reports, patient charts, and postoperative vital signs were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 2,099 operations. Eight ALs (0.43%) occurred without associated mortality. UGI was positive in 7 AL patients and falsely positive in 6 patients. The AL patients underwent laparoscopy on postoperative days 1 and 3 (n = 5 and n = 1, respectively), laparotomy on postoperative day 3 (n = 1), and peritoneal drainage (n = 1). False-positive UGIs prompted laparoscopy (n = 3) and close observation (n = 3). Pulse was 100 to 120 beats per minute in 2 patients and fever (>38.5°C) was present in 0 AL patients. AL patients had osteogenesis imperfecta (n = 1), macronodular cirrhosis (n = 1), positive bubble test (n = 3), and concomitant splenectomy (n = 1). No jejunojejunostomy leaks were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine UGI after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has greater sensitivity than clinical signs for detecting gastrojejunal leak. Delay in the diagnosis of leakage can impact mortality, and this suggests that indications for routine UGI might still exist. Tachycardia is not a reliable early marker of leak. There might be risk factors for leak in addition to vital signs, including patient medical history or intraoperative events, which should prompt routine UGI on postoperative day 1.

Mucosal tonometry as early warning of gastrojejunal leak in laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass

The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the standard surgical procedure for morbidly obese patients in many centers worldwide. The gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) leak has a 2 % incidence and a 10 % mortality. This prospective study aims to test gastroenteric tonometry as an early warning of GJA leak risk. A nasogastric tube with tonometric capability was used to monitor gastroenteric mucosal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PgeCO2) in 32 consecutive patients during the first 24 to 72 postoperative hours after LRYGB. Sensitivity was 100 %, specificity 96.77 %, likelihood ratio 31, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.984. The only early gastrojejunal leak occurred to the patient with maximal PgeCO2 (13.9 kPa) of the cohort. The remaining patients kept a PgeCO2 below 11 kPa except one; none of these developed early GJA leak. Mucosal gastroenteric tonometry may be a useful predictor of early GJA leak of the LRYGB.

Gastrobronchial fistula as a complication of bariatric surgery: a series of 6 cases

OBJECTIVE

To present a multicenter series of 6 patients who developed gastrobronchial fistula (GBF). GBF is a rare subtype of gastric leaks following bariatric surgery, which is the mainstay of treatment for the obesity pandemic.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 6 patients with GBF (out of 2,308 cases performed: 0.2%). One patient had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and 5 had a sleeve gastrectomy. Demographics, previous surgeries, clinical presentation, timing of fistula diagnosis, diagnostic and treatment measures employed, and outcome were collected.

RESULTS

Four patients were female, the average age and BMI were 42 years and 42.5 kg/m2, respectively. Three patients had previous surgeries (Nissen fundoplication, adjustable gastric banding, and vertical banded gastroplasty). Median time to fistula diagnosis was 40 days (range 15-90 days). Clinical presentation included chronic cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea and fever as well as persistent left pleural effusion or pneumonia. Diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography in all cases. Two patients were treated nonoperatively, while 4 eventually required surgery for resolution. Left lower lobectomy was necessary in 3 of 4 cases. Concomitant procedures were total gastrectomy in 2 cases and conversion of a sleeve to a gastric bypass in 1 case. Resolution occurred 30 days to 2 years after initial surgery. No mortalities were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

GBF is a rare but devastating complication following bariatric surgery. It may develop as a late complication of a chronic upper gastric leak. Surgery is curative although nonoperative management may be warranted in selected cases.

Complicações e óbitos nas operações para tratar a obesidade mórbida

RACIONAL: A cirurgia bariátrica, apesar de complexa, apresenta baixa morbimortalidade; contudo, quando presente apresenta graves conseqüências. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a presença de complicações e óbitos nos pacientes portadores de obesidade mórbida submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico. MÉTODOS: Análise retrospectiva de 656 pacientes submetidos a procedimento cirúrgico bariátrico. Foram analisados: sexo, idade, peso pré-operatório, índice de massa corporal pré-operatório, procedimento realizado, tempo de internação, complicações pós-operatórias e mortalidade. RESULTADOS: A idade variou entre 16 a 68 anos (média de 36,6 anos). Do total, 80,7% eram do sexo feminino. O índice de massa corporal médio foi de 42,8 kg/m2 (35 e 68 kg/m2) O tempo médio de internação foi de 4,5 dias (1 a 125 dias). O bypass gástrico foi realizado em 370 pacientes (56,40%) e a operação de Capella em 236 casos (35,97%). A principal complicação encontrada foi fístula, em 17 pacientes (2,59%). Houve necessidade de reoperação em 17 pacientes (2,59%). Oito pacientes morreram (1,21%), três foram submetidos à operação de Capella, três à bypass, um à opração de Scopinaro e um à gastrectomia vertical. CONCLUSÃO: A principal complicação foi a fístula digestiva, que ocorreu em 2,59% e a mortalidade foi de 1,21%.

Understanding the significance, reasons and patterns of abnormal vital signs after gastric bypass for morbid obesity

Anastomotic leaks and bleeding are the two most feared major complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB). This study was designed to evaluate if there is a clinical correlation between abnormal vital signs and postoperative leaks and bleeding. After IRB approval and adherence to HIPAA guidelines, a retrospective review of medical records was performed on 518 patients who underwent LRYGB between October 2002 and October 2006. Vital signs from each patient were monitored hourly. Eight patients out of 518 (1.54%) were discovered to have anastomotic leak. A marked increase in heart rate up to 120 bpm at 20 h after surgery occurred in five of eight patients (62.5%). Of the eight patients who had a leak, seven (87.5%) experienced sustained tachycardia above 120 bpm. On the other hand, 20 patients out of 518 (3.86%) were discovered to have postoperative bleeding. A gradual rather than a dramatic increase in heart rate was recorded in 17 of 20 patients (85%) starting 8 h after surgery. Five patients (25%) had unsustained tachycardia above 120 bpm. Twelve patients in this group (60%) were seen to have cyclical tachycardia that never exceeded 120 bpm at any point during hospitalization. Marginal hypotension was found in seven patients (35%) in this group. Sustained tachycardia with a heart rate exceeding 120 bpm appears to be an indicator of anastomotic leak. Tachycardia less than 120 bpm that has occurred in a cyclical pattern strongly pointed toward postoperative bleeding. Anastomotic leaks and bleeding are the two most feared major complications in patients undergoing LRYGB. This study was designed to evaluate if there is a clinical correlation between abnormal vital signs and postoperative leaks and bleeding.

Routine drainage is not necessary after laparoscopic gastric bypass

INTRODUCTION

Routine intra-abdominal drainage has been recommended for detecting surgical complications, such as anastomotic leaks or intra-abdominal hemorrhage, after laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. The aim of this study was to determine whether routine drainage after laparoscopic gastric bypass is indeed necessary.

METHODS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass with intra-abdominal drainage (D-group) were compared with those without drainage (N-group) in a retrospective study. The main outcome measures were postoperative course and complications.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in the postoperative complications. Both groups had one major complication of leakage (1/90, 1.1%). Minor complications occurred in six D-group patients (6/90, 6.7%) and eight N-group patients (8/90, 8.9%) (P=0.578). No difference was observed in postoperative analgesic dose usage (mean ± SD: 63 ± 37 mg vs 60 ± 31 mg; P=0.963) or length of stay hospital (5.2 ± 2.6 d vs 4.7 ± 1.8 d; P=0.135). However, the N-group had a shorter time to flatus passage compared to the D-group (1.6 ± 0.7 d vs 1.2 ± 0.5 d; P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Routine abdominal drainage is not necessary after a successful laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbidly obese patients. Drainage omission may contribute to a quicker recovery without additional surgical complications.

Revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, morbid obesity incidence has increased dramatically in the last decade and surgery is at this moment recognized as the only effective treatment with long-term sustained weight loss and resolution or significant improvement in comorbidities. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was successfully carried out by several groups as a bridge to future laparoscopic bariatric procedures with acceptable weight loss and reduction in comorbidities. LSG is considered a safe procedure with sporadically reported complications, such as bleeding or leakage from the staple line, strictures, delayed gastric emptying, gastric dilatation and vomiting. The aim of this publication is to describe complications of this procedure analyze different treatments of these events especially the surgical ones, reporting the technical management based on our experience and on the literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From March 2003 to December 2009, 294 patients underwent LSG in our Department. Complications are reported prospectively.

RESULTS

In our series 294 patients were operated and stapler line leak was observed in 11 patients (3.7%). The mean time from the first surgery up to the first reintervention was 15.6±22 days (2 to 78). Only 2 patients (0.68%) had to be operated owing to severe reflux related with the sleeve gastrectomy and the symptomatology was solved with the gastric bypass. Intraabdominal bleeding was observed in 7 patients (2.38%), being reoperated 3 (1.02%) of them. All patients were reoperated by laparoscopic approach and the bleeding vessel was identified in all of them. We identified 3 of 294 patients with strictures (1.02%). One of them was located in the gastroesophageal junction and the other 2 had a central location. The patient with high stenosis required endoscopic dilatation and the other 2 were resolved by a gastric bypass cutting the stomach proximal to the stricture. The global mortality was 0%. All of the patients were reoperated by laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION

LSG is a feasible bariatric procedure carried out increasingly in the last few years with low postoperative complications. Regardless, the knowledge of the potential complications associated to LSG and their management is crucial for patient's safety.

Management of leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with obesity

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a surgical procedure that is being increasingly performed on obese patients. The most frequent postoperative complication is the appearance of a gastric leak.

PURPOSE

To determine the main clinical features of a group of patients who developed a gastric leak after LSG.

MATERIAL

A total of 343 obese patients were submitted to LSG, two hundred and sixty-two women and 81 men with a mean age of 37.3 years and a BMI of 37.5 kg/m(2). Radiological evaluations were performed on all patients on the third day after surgery using liquid sulfate barium, as well as a close clinical control evaluation to monitor the appearance of epigastric pain, fever, tachycardia, C-reactive protein, and leukocytosis. Medical or surgical management of the leak were employed.

RESULTS

Fever was the earliest and most frequent symptom, followed by epigastric pain and tachycardia. Leaks were classified based on three parameters: severity or magnitude, location, and time of appearance after surgery. Leaks were classified as early if they appeared 1 to 4 days after surgery, intermediate if they appeared 5 to 9 days after surgery, and late 10 days after surgery. The diagnosis of a leak was confirmed with a barium liquid taken orally by six patients and with an abdominal CAT scan in ten. Surgical management was performed in eight patients, usually in those with early leaks (six patients). Early re-suturing in three patients was successful; however, re-suturing leaks after the third day resulted in failure. Medical management was performed mainly in patients with intermediate and late leaks, mainly through enteral nutrition and percutaneous drainage of the intra-abdominal fluid collection. There was no mortality. The mean healing days of these leaks was 45 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Close clinical observation detects gastric leaks early on inpatients who underwent LSG. We suggest evaluating these leaks based on three parameters: time of appearance, the location, and its severity, in order to propose the best medical or surgical treatment in these patients.

Managing medical and surgical disorders after divided Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reported that over 40% of the US population is overweight. The average weight loss attained by medical management programs is neither sufficient nor durable enough to treat medically complicated obesity. An estimated 220,000 bariatric procedures are performed yearly in the USA and Canada. The divided Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is performed most commonly in these countries and is considered the gold standard bariatric surgical procedure. The complexity of RYGB means that serious and potentially preventable perioperative complications can occur. RYGB alters the normal anatomy and physiology of the upper gut, which has predictable adverse effects and potential complications. Patients seek advice and care for symptoms that develop or persist after RYGB; although some symptoms are expected and predictable, others are complications that may or may not require active medical or surgical intervention. Physicians should be able to predict and manage most postoperative medical and nutritional disorders related to RYGB and should be prepared to assess patients for potential referral for surgical intervention or revision.

Leaks and endoscopic assessment of break of integrity after NOTES gastrotomy: the LEAKING study, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Gastric leak testing after natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) gastrotomy closure may help reduce the risk of leaks after transgastric procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a novel endoscopy-based system to determine the presence of a leak after NOTES gastrotomy and to compare this system prospectively with radiographic leak testing.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Fifty swine.

INTERVENTION

During the pretrial phase, an endoscopic system for the measurement of intragastric pressure was developed. In the trial phase, swine with a NOTES gastrotomy were randomized to endoscopic versus radiographic leak testing. If a leak was demonstrated, the gastrotomy was reclosed by using a second-generation prototype T-anchor system. The primary outcome was leak detection after gastrotomy closure. The secondary outcome variables included necropsy findings, peritoneal fluid analysis, histologic examination, and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Fourteen swine were included in the pretrial phase and 36 in the randomized trial. Swine were survived for a mean of 9 days postoperatively. Endoscopic pressure monitoring demonstrated a reproducible change in intragastric pressure with insufflation; r = 0.735, P = .001 and r = 0.769, P < or = .000 for the total and maximum pressures, respectively. Post-peritoneoscopy, there was a detectable and significant decrease in the mean total and mean maximum pressures versus baseline (P = .006 and P = .009). There was no significant difference between the radiologic and endoscopic arms in leak detection rate (4/18 vs 3/18, respectively, P = .500). Clinical outcomes and mean weight gain were equivalent. There was 1 operative abdominal wall injury and no deaths.

LIMITATIONS

Animal study.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic pressure monitoring was reproducible, demonstrated the presence of gastric leak, and was as reliable as contrast-based radiographic leak testing.

Gastric leak after laparoscopic-sleeve gastrectomy for obesity

BACKGROUND

One of the most serious complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is gastric leak. Few publications exist concerning the treatment of gastric leak. We sought to determine by way of a prospective study the clinical presentation, postoperative course, and treatment of gastric leak after LSG for obesity.

METHODS

From October 2005 to August 2008, 214 patients with different degrees of obesity underwent LSG. During surgery, each patient received saline with methylene blue by way of nasogastric tube and had a drain placed. All patients underwent radiologic study with liquid barium sulphate on postoperative day 3.

RESULTS

Seven patients developed gastric leak. Leak in two patients (28.6%) was diagnosed by upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) study. Two patients had type I leak (28.6%), and five patients had type II leak (71.4%). Four patients underwent reoperation. Three patients were managed medically with enteral or parenteral feeding; the drain was maintained in situ; and collections were drained by percutaneous punctions guided by computed axial tomography. Mean hospital length of stay was 28.8 days, and time to leakage closure was 43 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Different ways exist to manage gastric leak, depending on the magnitude of the collection and the clinical repercussions. When treatment necessitates reintervention and is performed early, suture repair is more likely to be successful. Leakage closure time will vary.

Radiological imaging of the GI tract after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Obesity is becoming epidemic in proportion and is leading to considerable morbidity and mortality in the community. Bariatric surgery offers one tested solution to sustained weight loss and comorbidity reduction. However, it is associated with a significant number of complications.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to review the utility of radiological techniques in the diagnosis of surgical complications after bariatric surgery.

DESIGN

Literature-based review and pictorial illustration in the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of complications after bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiology plays a critical role in the diagnosis of complications after bariatric surgery. Upper GI contrast study and CT are the most commonly used imaging modalities in this regard. They are complementary in their diagnostic abilities and should be used in concert for the complete evaluation of symptomatic patients. All other radiological imaging modalities are also used in the diagnosis of complications after bariatric surgery, but much less commonly.

Standardization of the fully stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity reduces early immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality: a single center study on 2606 patients

Background

Various techniques of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass have been described. We completely standardized this procedure to minimize its sometimes substantial morbidity and mortality. This study describes our experience with the standardized fully stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (FS-LRYGB) and its influence on the 30-day morbidity and mortality.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 2,645 patients who underwent FS-LRYGB from May 2004 to August 2008. Operative time, hospital stay and readmission, re-operation, and 30-day morbidity/mortality rates were then calculated. The 30-day follow-up data were complete for 2,606 patients (98.5%).

Results

There were 539 male and 2,067 female patients. Mean age was 39.2 years (range 14–73), mean BMI 41.44 kg/m² (range, 23–75.5). The mean hospital stay was 3.35 days (range 2–71). Mean total operative time was 63 min (range 35–150).

One patient died of pneumonia within 30 days of surgery (0.04%). One hundred and fifty one (5.8%) patients had postoperative complications as follows: gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 89, 3.42%), intestinal obstruction (n = 9, 0.35%), anastomotic leak (n = 5, 0.19%) and others (n = 47, 1.80%). In 66 patients, the bleeding resolved without any surgical re-intervention. One hemorrhage resulted in hypovolemic shock with subsequent renal and hepatic failure.

Conclusion

The systematic approach and the full standardization of the FS-LRYGB procedure contribute highly to the very low mortality and the low morbidity rates in our institution. Gastrointestinal bleeding appears to be the commonest complication, but is self-limiting in the majority of cases. Our approach also significantly reduces operative time and turns the technically demanding laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure into an easy reproducible operation, effective for training.

Complications of bariatric surgery: implications for the covering physician

Bariatric surgery is the only effective option for sustained weight loss for morbidly obese patients. The increasing prevalence of obesity in America and the application of a laparoscopic approach to bariatric surgery have combined to dramatically increase the number of patients undergoing these types of operations. The number of bariatric surgeons and centers devoted to surgery of the morbidly obese is also rising. These facts lead to the assumption that there will be more patients with complications specific to bariatric surgery that must be cared for by general surgeons in the immediate future. Covering surgeons and those without expertise in bariatric surgery need to know how to diagnose and manage these potential complications in emergent and outpatient settings. This paper reviews some of the more common bariatric operations, complications, and conservative treatment options.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist health-care professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Selective nonoperative management of leaks after gastric bypass: lessons learned from 2675 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of patients with leaks after primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) managed operatively with those managed nonoperatively and subsequently derive indications for selective nonoperative management.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is no consensus on the management of leaks complicating GBP, which remains the commonest cause of death.

METHODS

We evaluated 2675 consecutive GBP procedures, determining incidence and outcomes of leaks in a program emphasizing early detection, routine drainage, and selective nonoperative management.

RESULTS

Leaks occurred in 46 patients (41 women) with mean (+/-SD) age of 46.9 +/- 8.7 years, weight and body mass index (BMI) of 307.8 +/- 56.9 lb and 51.2 +/- 9.5 kg/m, respectively. Leaks were initially identified by upper gastrointestinal contrast swallow (UGI) on the first postoperative day (22), abnormal drain output (11), delayed UGI (3), or on clinical suspicion (10) with a respective interval to diagnosis of 1.1*, 6.5, 7, and 7.9 days (*P < 0.007 vs. other groups). Leaks were located in the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis (37), gastric pouch (4), gastric remnant (2), jejuno-jejunostomy (1), Roux limb (1), and cervical esophagus (1), and were radiologically contained (40) or diffuse (3) or not demonstrable (3). Contained leaks were treated nonoperatively (31), by operation (7), or required no treatment (2). Patients with diffuse leaks or bilious drain output were operatively managed. They were similar in duration for nil per oral order, drain and antibiotic use and readmission rates, whereas hospital stays were longer in the operative group, P < 0.01. There were no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Many leaks after gastric bypass are radiologically contained GJ and pouch leaks and can be safely managed nonoperatively. Radiologic features and bilious drainage were key determinants of treatment, with operative treatment used for diffuse GJ leaks, bilious drainage, or clinical suspicion with a negative UGI. Outcomes were similar in both groups.

Variations of weight loss following gastric bypass and gastric band

OBJECTIVE

To compare and describe the weight loss outcomes from gastric bypass and gastric band so as to define the variation of excess weight loss (EWL) among individual patients, the time to onset of effect, and the durability of weight loss in severely obese adults.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Gastric bypass and gastric band are the most common operations for obesity performed in the United States, but few reports have compared these 2 procedures.

METHODS

Patients (N = 1733, aged 18-65 years) met National Institutes of Health criteria for obesity surgery and underwent either gastric bypass or gastric band between March 1997 and November 2006. The selection of bypass versus band was based on patient/surgeon discussion. The evaluable sample consisted of 1518 patients. The percentage of EWL was assessed over 2 years. Successful weight loss was defined a priori as > or = 40% EWL in each of four 6-month postoperative measurement periods. The analyses included a mixed model and generalized estimating equation (GEE) model with repeated measures. Odds ratios and descriptive analyses were also provided.

RESULTS

Gastric bypass was associated with less individual variation in weight loss than gastric band. Both procedures were associated with a significant EWL benefit (Treatment Group effect P < 0.0001), but they differed in terms of time to effect (Treatment Group x Period interaction effect P < 0.0001). The mean EWL for gastric bypass was greater at each measurement period (6, 12, 18, 24 months) compared with gastric band (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, at each of the postoperative measurement periods within each treatment group (bypass and band), the mean EWL was greater for those who had preoperative body mass index (BMI) < or = 50 kg/m2 than for those who had preoperative BMI > 50 kg/m2 (P < 0.0001). Gastric bypass was consistently associated with a greater likelihood of at least a 40% EWL in each of the 6-month postoperative measurement periods (GEE, P < 0.0001). The odds ratio estimates at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 were 18.2, 20.6, 15.5, and 9.1, respectively. Despite these clinically meaningful outcome differences, nearly all (> or = 93%) bypass and band patients who had > or = 40% EWL at 6, 12, or 18 months postoperatively maintained at least this level of success at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric bypass produced more rapid, greater, and more consistent EWL across individuals over a 2-year postoperative period than gastric band.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice are systematically developed statements to assist healthcare professionals in medical decision making for specific clinical conditions. Most of the content herein is based on literature reviews. In areas of uncertainty, professional judgment was applied. These guidelines are a working document that reflects the state of the field at the time of publication. Because rapid changes in this area are expected, periodic revisions are inevitable. We encourage medical professionals to use this information in conjunction with their best clinical judgment. The presented recommendations may not be appropriate in all situations. Any decision by practitioners to apply these guidelines must be made in light of local resources and individual patient circumstances. The American Society for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition fully endorses sections of these guidelines that address the metabolic and nutritional management of the bariatric surgical patient.

Hybrid natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model

BACKGROUND

The indications for natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) are yet to be determined. Morbidly obese patients may be one population that would benefit from this approach due to the elimination of wound complications and possibly a faster recovery. As a bariatric restrictive procedure, sleeve gastrectomy could be one indication for NOTES. To test the feasibility of this procedure with a NOTES approach, a pig model was used.

METHODS

Acute studies investigated five 40-kg farm pigs. The rectum was used as the port of entry to the peritoneal cavity, and the stomach was manipulated endoluminally using a gastroscope. Vision was acquired through a 5-mm laparoscope introduced transabdominally (i.e. via the hybrid technique). A 10-mm incision was made on the anterior wall of the rectum and dilated to accommodate a 12-mm trocar introduced through the rectal wall into the peritoneal cavity. The greater curvature of the stomach then was divided and detached, starting from the antrum and proceeding to the esophagogastric junction using a laparoscopic stapler. The sleeve gastrectomy was completed by dividing the short gastric vessels with an ultrasonic scalpel. The gastric pouch then was removed through the rectal incision.

RESULTS

A NOTES gastric sleeve resection was successfully performed in all five pigs. The technique was developed, and feasibility was determined. After resection, the gastric remnant was inflated, with no evidence of leakage. At autopsy, intact suture lines were noted. Closure of the rectal incision was not attempted.

CONCLUSION

A NOTES sleeve gastrectomy is feasible in porcine animal models. The rectal port of entry allows rigid laparoscopic instruments to be introduced into the peritoneal cavity and enables performance of gastrointestinal procedures the same as in standard laparoscopic surgery. Extra-long instruments are necessary for dissection and division of the stomach at the esophagogastric junction and for accessing the short gastric vessels.

Management of anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leaks after bariatric surgery carry high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe our experience of the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass in a single institution.

METHODS

Of 1,200 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with manual gastrojejunal anastomosis for morbid obesity from January 2002 to January 2007, we retrospectively analyzed 59 patients with anastomotic leak. The location of the leak, day of diagnosis, diagnostic methods, clinical manifestations, treatment modalities, associated complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed.

RESULTS

Leaks were located as follows: 67.8% in the gastrojejunostomy, 10.2% in the gastric pouch, 3.4% in the excluded stomach, 5.1% in the jejunojejunal anastomosis, 3.4% in the gastrojejunostomy plus pouch, 3.4% in the pouch plus excluded stomach, and 6.8% in undetermined sites. Routine upper gastrointestinal series revealed contrast extravasation in nine patients (15.3%). Leaks were asymptomatic at diagnosis in 29 patients (49.2%). Surgical reintervention was carried out in 23 patients, and conservative treatment was provided in the remaining 36. Transfer to the intensive care unit was required in 11 patients, with five deaths (0.4%).

CONCLUSION

In our experience, most anastomotic leaks can be managed with conservative measures alone. In many patients, abdominal drains are effective in the management of leaks, obviating the need for reintervention. Nasoenteral nutrition was effective in the non-operative management of gastrojejunal leaks in patients without signs of systemic toxicity.

Fístulas de anastomose superior pós-gastroplastia redutora pela técnica de Higa para tratamento da obesidade mórbida: aspectos por imagem

OBJETIVO: Descrever os principais aspectos radiológicos encontrados nas fístulas pós-operatórias de anastomose superior em pacientes submetidos a derivação gastrintestinal em Y de Roux pela técnica de Higa. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 24 pacientes com fístula de anastomose no pós-operatório de gastroplastia redutora, avaliados por tomografias computadorizadas e/ou seriografias esofagogastrojejunais. RESULTADOS: As fístulas de anastomose superior ocorreram até o 30º dia de pós-operatório. Dezenove pacientes realizaram exame radiológico no momento do diagnóstico, sendo observado extravasamento de contraste, considerado sinal direto de fístula de anastomose, em dez pacientes. Dos nove restantes, em sete foi evidenciado extravasamento em exames subseqüentes, sendo ainda identificados sinais indiretos de fístula em seis destes. Sinais indiretos foram observados também em pacientes com extravasamento de contraste nos exames iniciais, sendo o pneumoperitônio o aspecto mais freqüente. Dos cinco pacientes sem exame radiológico no momento do diagnóstico, exames subseqüentes evidenciaram extravasamento de contraste em um e sinais indiretos em quatro pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: O achado radiológico mais comum foi o extravasamento de contraste (sinal direto de fístula). Os sinais indiretos foram: nível líquido bizarro, coleção intracavitária, pneumoperitônio desproporcional ao tempo pós-operatório, líquido na cavidade peritoneal, edema da anastomose inferior e distensão de delgado.

High mortality rate for patients requiring intensive care after surgical revision following bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

To report the prognosis and management of patients reoperated for severe intraabdominal sepsis (IAS) after bariatric surgery (S0) and admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) for organ failure.

METHODS

A French observational study in a 12-bed adult surgical intensive care unit in a 1,200-bed teaching hospital with expertise in bariatric surgery. From January 2001 to August 2006, 27 morbidly obese patients (18 transferred from other institutions) developed severe postoperative IAS (within 45 days). Clinical signs, biochemical and radiologic findings, and treatment during the postoperative course after S0 were reviewed. Time to reoperation, characteristics of IAS, demographic data, and disease severity scores at ICU admission were recorded and their influence on prognosis was analyzed.

RESULTS

The presence of respiratory signs after S0 led to an incorrect diagnosis in more than 50% of the patients. Preoperative weight (body mass index [BMI] > 50 kg/m2) and multiple reoperations were associated with a poorer prognosis in the ICU. The ICU mortality rate was 33% and increased with the number of organ failures at reoperation.

CONCLUSION

During the initial postoperative course after bariatric surgery, physical examination of the abdomen is unreliable to identify surgical complications. The presence of respiratory signs should prompt abdominal investigations before the onset of organ failure. An urgent laparoscopy, as soon as abnormal clinical events are detected, is a valuable tool for early diagnosis and could shorten the delay in treatment.

Strangulation of upper jejunum in subsequent pregnancy following gastric bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE

Gastric bypass is a surgical procedure that is popularly used to treat morbid obesity. Herein, we report a woman who had a rare gastrointestinal complication during the subsequent antepartum period following a gastric bypass surgery.

CASE REPORT

After a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, a 32-year-old woman had unrelenting epigastria for one week at 36 weeks' gestation. An emergency cesarean delivery, followed by laparotomy, was performed. A female neonate was delivered with Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. Strangulation and gangrene of the upper jejunum caused by a fibrous band at the site of the Roux anastomosis were revealed. Segmental resection of the nonviable bowel was performed. The patient experienced a smooth postoperative course.

CONCLUSION

The awareness of internal hernias and small bowel strangulation should be addressed when unrelenting epigastric pain is present in women after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, during their first subsequent pregnancy.

Surgical management of gastro-gastric fistula after divided laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Gastro-gastric fistula (GGF) formation is uncommon after divided laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity. Optimal surgical management remains controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing LRYGB from January 2001 to October 2006.

RESULTS

Of 1,763 primary procedures, 27 patients (1.5%) developed a GGF and 10 (37%) resolved with medical management, whereas 17 (63%) required surgical intervention. An additional seven patients requiring surgical intervention for GGF after RYGB were referred from another institution. Indications for surgery included weight regain, recurrent, or non-healing gastrojejunal anastomotic (GJA) ulceration with persistent abdominal pain and/or hemorrhage, and/or recurrent GJA stricture. Remnant gastrectomy with GGF excision or exclusion was performed in 23 patients (96%) with an average in-hospital stay of 7.5 days (range, 3-27). Morbidity in six patients (25%) was caused by pneumonia, n=2; wound infection, n=2; staple-line bleed, n=1; and subcapsular splenic hematoma, n=1. There were no mortalities. Complete resolution of symptoms and associated ulceration was seen in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSION

Although uncommon, GGF formation can complicate divided LRYGB. Laparoscopic remnant gastrectomy with fistula excision or exclusion can be used to effectively manage symptomatic patients who fail to respond to conservative measures.

Are African-Americans as successful as Caucasians after laparoscopic gastric bypass?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) has been demonstrated to provide weight loss comparable to open gastric bypass. It has been suggested that African-Americans (AA) are not as successful as Caucasians (CA) after bariatric surgery. Our hypothesis was that AAs are just as successful as CA after LRYGBP in terms of weight loss and comorbidity improvement.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all AA and CA patients who underwent LRYGBP for a 6-month period. Success after LRYGBP [defined as (1) 25% loss of preoperative weight, (2) 50% excess weight loss (EWL), or (3) weight loss to within 50% ideal weight] was compared by ethnicity.

RESULTS

102 patients were included in this study. 97 patients (30 AA patients and 67 CA patients) had at least 1-year follow-up data available. Preoperative data did not differ between both groups. There was a statistically significant difference in %EWL between AA and CA (66% vs 74%; P<0.05). However, there was no ethnic difference in the percentage of patients with successful weight loss (as defined by any of the above 3 criteria). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the percentages of AA and CA patients who had improved or resolved diabetes and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

LRYGBP offers good weight loss in all patients. While there may be greater %EWL in CA patients, no ethnic difference in successful weight loss exists. More importantly, co-morbidities improve or resolve equally between AA and CA patients. LRYGBP should be considered successful in AA patients.

Effect of location and speed of diagnosis on anastomotic leak outcomes in 3828 gastric bypass cases

INTRODUCTION

Leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are a major cause of mortality. This study attempts to define the relationship between the leak site, time from surgery to detection, and outcome.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 3,828 gastric bypass procedures.

RESULTS

Of the leaks (3.9% overall), 60/2,337 (2.6%) occurred after open gastric bypass, 57/1,080 (5.2%) after laparoscopic gastric bypass, and 33/411 (8.0%) after revisions. Overall leak-related mortality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was 0.6% (22/3,828). Mortality rate from gastrojejunostomy leaks (38 in the open gastric bypass, and 43 in the laparoscopic) was higher in the open group than the laparoscopic group (18.4 vs 2.3%, p = 0.015). Median time of detection for a gastrojejunostomy leak in the open group was longer than in the laparoscopic group (3 vs 1 days, Wilcoxon score p < 0.001). Jejunojejunostomy (JJ) leak was associated with a 40% mortality rate. Initial upper gastrointestinal series did not detect 9/10 jejunojejunostomy leaks. Median detection time was longer in the jejunojejunostomy leak group than the gastrojejunostomy leak group (4 vs 2 days, p = 0.037).

DISCUSSION

Leak mortality and time of detection was higher after open gastric bypass than laparoscopic gastric bypass. GBP patients with normal upper gastrointestinal (UGI) studies may harbor leaks, especially at the JJ or excluded stomach. Normal UGI findings should not delay therapy if clinical signs suggest a leak.

The utility of routine postoperative upper GI series following laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Routine upper gastrointestinal (UGI) studies following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) have the potential advantage of early identification of anastomotic complications. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of routine postoperative UGI and its relationship to clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Over a three-year period, 516 patients underwent LRYGBP followed by routine postoperative UGI studies. Data were collected on the results of the UGI, clinical parameters, and patient outcomes. Study groups were composed of patients with a normal UGI (Group I, n = 455), abnormal UGI not requiring further intervention (Group II, n = 36), and abnormal UGI requiring further intervention (Group III, n =25). Statistical significance was set at alpha= 0.05 level for all analyses.

RESULTS

The three study groups were not statistically different in mean age (42 years) or body mass index (BMI) (45) and were predominantly female (90%). Most patients had an uneventful postoperative course. Anastomotic complications (gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy) were uncommon (1.3%). The sensitivity of the UGI for anastomotic leak in this study was low (33%). However, all patients with alimentary limb obstruction (n = 3) had UGI evidence of this complication. Of the 516 UGI reports, there were only 25 (4.8%, Group III) that were abnormal and required some form of intervention ranging from serial imaging (84%) to reoperation (16%). Of the various clinical parameters examined, the patients in Group III demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of fever (p < 0.001), tachycardia (p < 0.01), vomiting (p < 0.001), and postoperative day 1 leukocytosis (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that routine UGI after LRYGBP has limited utility as it may result in unnecessary intervention based on false-positive results or a delay in treatment based on false-negative results. We advocate selective UGI imaging following LRYGBP based on the patient's clinical factors, particularly fever and tachycardia.

Routine upper GI series after gastric bypass does not reliably identify anastomotic leaks or predict stricture formation

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons who perform Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for morbid obesity routinely obtain an upper gastrointestinal (GI) series in the early postoperative period to search for anastomotic leaks and signs of stricture formation at the gastrojejunostomy. We hypothesized that this practice is unreliable.

METHODS

We analyzed 654 consecutive RYGBs, of which 63% were completed laparoscopically. An upper GI series was obtained in 634 (97%) patients. The radiographic findings (leak or delayed emptying) were compared with clinical outcomes (leak or stricture formation) to calculate the sensitivity and specificity. Univariate analysis identified risk factors for leaks or stricture formation; events were too few for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 634 routine upper GI series, anastomotic leaks at the gastrojejunostomy were diagnosed in 5 (0.8%); 2 of these 5 were later reinterpreted as artifacts. Four leaks were not seen on the initial upper GI series, yielding an overall sensitivity of 43% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%. Univariate analysis showed that cases done early (odds ratio [OR] 5.4 for the first 100 cases, p = 0.02) and prolonged operating time (OR 7.8 for cases >or= 300 min, p = 0.01) were associated with leaks. Emptying into the Roux-en-Y limb was delayed in 127 (20%) of the upper GI series. Strictures requiring dilatation developed in 16 (2.4%) patients. The PPV of delayed emptying for stricture formation was 6%. Risk factors for stricture formation included stapled anastomosis (OR 7.8, p = 0.002), surgeon inexperience (OR 2.9 for first 50 cases, p = 0.04), and delayed emptying (OR 3.3; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the incidence of anastomotic complications and the sensitivity of upper GI series were both low, routine upper GI series did not reliably identify leaks or predict stricture formation. A selective approach, whereby imaging is reserved for patients with clinical evidence of a leak or stricture, may be more appropriate.

Outpatient complications encountered following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Practitioners taking care of postoperative bariatric patients need to keep in mind all of the complications that this population faces to prevent unnecessary morbidity. Bariatric patients presenting postoperatively with abdominal pain, tachycardia, vomiting, tachypnea, and a sense of impending doom should be worked up aggressively to find the cause of their symptoms. Because the incidence of obesity is rising in children and adults, more patients will have surgery to help with their weight loss. Physicians caring for these patients must be able to diagnosis and treat their complications quickly and efficiently to prevent further complications.

Anastomotic Leak following Antecolic versus Retrocolic Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is the most commonly performed operation for the treatment of morbid obesity in the United States. Previous reports suggest that postoperative complications may be influenced by Roux limb orientation (antecolic versus retrocolic), although this remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze our experience with anastomotic leaks following LRYGBP with an antecolic- versus retrocolic-routed Roux limb.

METHODS

During the 2-year period of June 2003 to June 2005, 353 patients underwent a LRYGBP. 135 were antecolic and 218 retrocolic. All cases were performed by one of three bariatric surgeons. The decision to perform antecolic versus retrocolic LRYGBP was left to the surgeon's preference. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 28 weeks. There were no perioperative deaths. Overall complication rate was 16.9%. 17 gastrojejunal leaks (4.8%) were identified, consisting of 12 intraoperative leaks (3.4%) and 5 postoperative leaks (1.4%). Postoperative gastrojejunal leak rate was higher in the antecolic group (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Mortality and complication rates were consistent with reported benchmarks on the efficacy and safety of LRYGBP. Our review suggests that anastomotic leak may be more common after antecolic than after retrocolic LRYGBP for morbid obesity. A prospective randomized study is needed to determine whether antecolically-routed Roux limb is an independent predictor for anastomotic leak following LRYGBP.