The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: Mid-term analysis of 400 cases

Laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernia. State of the art in 2012

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the results of laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias using intra-peritoneal prosthetic mesh through a review of published surgical series.

METHODS

All large series of patients treated for an incisional hernia by laparoscopy and published between 2002 and 2011 were identified. The results of controlled randomized series comparing this technique with open surgical repair were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two series with a total of 7057 patients were analyzed (range 51-1242); the mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 32 (range: 28.5-46), and the mean size of the hernia defect was 10.6 cm (range: 6-14.9 cm). The mean rate of conversion to open surgical repair was 2.7%. Mean operative duration was 90 ± 33 minutes. Mortality was 0.8%, usually due to an unrecognized intestinal injury (1.6%), which occurred more frequently with second or iterative hernia repairs. Hospital stay averaged 2.5 days. The infection rate was 0.3% and the rate of hernia recurrence was 4.6% (with a mean follow-up of 36 months). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of post-operative complications or hernia recurrence in the randomized studies comparing laparoscopic to open anterior abdominal surgical repair. However, duration of hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopy in some studies.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia is technically feasible and reliable for large hernia defects, even in obese patients. This approach should be reserved for patients with no history of previous hernia repair in order to avoid the risk of intestinal injury. It appears to allow for a shortened duration of hospitalization.

Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Technique of mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a matter of debate. Literature is lacking in randomized trials comparing various methods of mesh fixation. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes following the two methods of mesh fixation.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients were randomized to tacker mesh fixation or suture mesh fixation. Patients with nonrecurrent hernias with defect size ranging from 2 to 5 cm were included. The cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. SF-36v2 health survey was used for quality-of-life analysis. Patients were followed up at regular intervals, and return to activity and satisfaction scores were recorded.

RESULTS

Demographic profile and hernia characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Operation time was significantly higher (p < 0) and early postoperative pain at 1 h, 6 h, and 1 month was significantly lower in the suture group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic pain and seroma formation over a mean follow-up of 32.2 months. Cost of procedure was significantly higher in group I (p < 0.001). Suture fixation was found to be more cost-effective than tacker fixation. Postoperative quality of life outcomes were similar in the two groups. Among return to activity parameters, time to resumption of daily activities and starting climbing stairs were significantly shorter in the suture group.

CONCLUSIONS

The suture fixation method is a cost-effective alternative to tacker fixation in patients with small- to medium-sized defects in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Suture fixation is better than tacker fixation in terms of early postoperative pain and return to activity. The two procedures are equally effective regarding the recurrence rates, complications, hospital stay, chronic pain, quality of life determinants, and patient satisfaction.

Bulging of the mesh after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias

Although not a hernia recurrence, symptomatic bulging after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair requires a new repair.

Background and Objectives:

To investigate the prevalence, diagnosis, clinical significance, and treatment strategies for bulging in the area of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia that is caused by mesh protrusion through the hernia opening, but with intact peripheral fixation of the mesh and actually a still sufficient repair.

Methods:

Medical records of all 765 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were reviewed, and all patients with a swelling in the repaired area were identified and analyzed.

Results:

Twenty-nine patients were identified. They all underwent a computed tomography assessment. Seventeen patients (2.2% of the total group) had a hernia recurrence; in an additional 12 patients (1.6%), radiologic examinations indicated only bulging of the mesh but no recurrence. Bulging was associated with pain in 4 patients who underwent relaparoscopy and got a new, larger mesh tightly stretched over the entire previous repair. Eight asymptomatic patients decided on “watchful waiting.” All patients remained symptom free during a median follow-up of 22 months.

Conclusion:

Symptomatic bulging, though not a recurrence, requires a new repair and must be considered as an important negative outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. In asymptomatic patients, “watchful waiting” seems justified.

Low risk of trocar site hernia repair 12 years after primary laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

The risk of trocar site hernia (TSH) may be 0-22%, but no large scaled data with long-term follow-up are available. The purpose of this study was to estimate the long-term risk of TSH repair.

METHODS

All patients in Denmark who underwent a laparoscopic procedure in 1997 were identified using the Danish National Patient Register and followed during a 12-year period. Hospital records for patients with an incisional or umbilical hernia repair were tracked and manually analyzed for possible relationship between reoperation and the initial laparoscopy.

RESULTS

We included 7,626 patients. During follow-up, we identified 95 patients with TSH repair with a cumulative risk of 1.3% being lowest after minor gynecological procedures and appendectomy and highest after fundoplication, cholecystectomy, and oophorectomy. The TSH was mainly at the umbilicus site (n = 63, 66%), and 15 (16%) of the TSH repairs were performed as an emergency procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term risk of TSH repair is low, but the risk of an emergency operation for TSH is relatively high, which suggests that all patients with a TSH should be offered elective repair.

Long-Term Outcomes with Transfascial Sutures versus Tacks in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Review

Although most surgeons report using both transfascial sutures and laparoscopically placed tacks to secure prostheses in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, a significant minority have reported large series in which sutures were omitted. A systematic review of the available literature was conducted for large case series and controlled trials documenting long-term follow-up. Forty-three articles were identified, including 6015 patients whose prostheses were secured with transfascial sutures (with or without tacks), and 2450 patients receiving tacks or staples alone. The mean follow-up time reported was 30.1 months. No significant difference was found in rates of hernia recurrence, mesh removal, prolonged postoperative pain, patient body mass index, or hernia defect size between the two groups. The suture group did experience a significantly higher rate of surgical site infection. Although suture tensile strength is greater than that of tacks, and despite numerous anecdotal reports of hernia recurrence secondary to suture failure or omission, the existing literature does not show superiority of one mesh fixation technique over the other for recurrence, whereas infection rates increase when transfascial suture is used.

Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of Parietex® composite mesh with an associated aponeurotic graft (280 cases)

AIMS OF THE STUDY

To evaluate post-operative complications and the recurrence rate after repair of large ventral incisional hernia with an open technique using intraperitoneal composite mesh and an associated aponeurotic overlay.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study included a total of 280 patients who underwent repair of large incisional hernia using Parietex(®) composite mesh.

RESULTS

The post-operative mortality rate was 0.35%. Six patients (2%) developed subcutaneous surgical site infection without infection of the prosthesis. Six other patients (2%) developed a deep-seated infection; in three cases, the mesh had to be removed. Nine patients (3.2%) developed recurrent incisional hernia.

CONCLUSION

Large ventral incisional hernias can be effectively treated by the intraperitoneal placement of Parietex(®) composite mesh overlaid by an aponeurotic graft; the incidence of complications in this prospective study was very low.

Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review

PURPOSE

There is a risk of developing a trocar site hernia (TSH) after laparoscopic surgery, but data is sparse and based mostly on retrospective studies with a short and poorly defined follow-up period. Surgical approaches and patient-related co-morbidity have also been suggested as risk factors for development of TSH. The aim of the present review was to perform a qualitative systematic analysis to estimate the incidence of TSH and to discuss the surgical and patient-related risk factors for development of TSH.

METHODS

The literature search was until 19 May 2010. Studies with TSH, defined as either operation for TSH or a hernia found during clinical follow-up, were included. We included randomised controlled trials, prospective non-controlled studies including >200 patients, and retrospective studies including >200 patients. The review was completed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 19 studies in adults and 3 studies in paediatric patients (<18 years), and a total of 30,568 adults and 1,098 children were analysed. The overall incidence of TSH was 0-5.2%. TSH occurred most often (96%) in trocar sites of a minimum of 10 mm, located mostly in the umbilicus region (82%). Data supported a higher incidence of TSH when the trocar site fascia was not sutured, and in pre-school children undergoing a laparoscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data suggests a relatively low incidence of TSH but that all trocar incisions of a minimum of 10 mm should be closed. In pre-school children undergoing laparoscopic surgery, all port sites should be closed.

Comparison of three separate antiadhesive barriers for intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernia repair in an experimental model

Background

Adhesion formation is a common adverse effect in intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) surgery. Different methods of adhesion prevention have been developed, including coated meshes and separate antiadhesive barriers (SABs). In this study one type of mesh was tested with different SABs, which were fixed to the sutured mesh using fibrin sealant. The primary aim was to compare adhesion prevention between different SABs. Secondary aims were the assessment of tissue integration and evaluation of SAB fixation with fibrin sealant.

Methods

Thirty-two rats were randomized to one of three treatment groups (SurgiWrap®, Prevadh® and Seprafilm®) or a control group (no SAB). Animals were operated on with an open IPOM technique (8 per group). One macroporous polypropylene mesh per animal (2 × 2 cm) was fixed with four non-absorbable sutures. An antiadhesive barrier of 2·5 × 2·5 cm was fixed with fibrin sealant. After 30 days, adhesion formation, tissue integration, seroma formation, inflammation and vascularization were evaluated macroscopically and by histology.

Results

Prevadh® and Seprafilm® groups showed a significant reduction in adhesion formation compared with the control group. Tissue integration of the mesh was reduced in these groups. Fibrin sealant fixed the SAB to the mesh securely in all groups.

Conclusion

Prevadh® and Seprafilm® are potent materials for the reduction of adhesion formation. A potential relationship between effective adhesion prevention and impaired tissue integration of the implant was observed. Fibrin sealant proved an excellent agent for SAB fixation.

Mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: glue fixation provides attachment strength similar to absorbable tacks but differs substantially in different meshes

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has gained popularity among minimally invasive surgeons. However, mesh fixation remains a matter of discussion. This study was designed to compare noninvasive fibrin-glue attachment with tack fixation of meshes developed primarily for intra-abdominal use. It was hypothesized that particular mesh structures would substantially influence detachment force.

STUDY DESIGN

For initial evaluation, specimens of laminated polypropylene/polydioxanone meshes were anchored to porcine abdominal walls by either helical titanium tacks or absorbable tacks in vitro. A universal tensile-testing machine was used to measure tangential detachment forces (TF). For subsequent experiments of glue fixation, polypropylene/polydioxanone mesh and 4 additional meshes with diverse particular mesh structure, ie, polyvinylidene fluoride/polypropylene mesh, a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh, a polyester mesh bonded with a resorbable collagen, and a macroporous condensed PTFE mesh were evaluated.

RESULTS

TF tests revealed that fibrin-glue attachment was not substantially different from that achieved with absorbable tacks (median TF 7.8 Newton [N], range 1.3 to 15.8 N), but only when certain open porous meshes (polyvinylidene fluoride/polypropylene mesh: median 6.2 N, range 3.4 to 10.3 N; titanium-coated polypropylene mesh: median 5.2 N, range 2.1 to 11.7 N) were used. Meshes coated by an anti-adhesive barrier (polypropylene/polydioxanone mesh: median 3.1 N, range 1.7 to 5.8 N; polyester mesh bonded with a resorbable collagen: median 1.3 N, range 0.5 to 1.9 N), or the condensed PTFE mesh (median 3.1 N, range 2.1 to 7.0 N) provided a significantly lower TF (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrin glue appears to be an appealing noninvasive option for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, but only if appropriate meshes are used. Glue can also serve as an adjunct to mechanical fixation to reduce the number of invasive tacks.

A prospective randomized study comparing suture mesh fixation versus tacker mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias

INTRODUCTION

After the first report of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair (LIVHR) in 1993, several studies have proven its efficacy over open method. Among the technical issues, the technique of mesh fixation to the abdominal wall is still an area of debate. This prospective randomized study was done to compare two techniques of mesh fixation, i.e., tacker with four corner transfascial sutures versus transfascial sutures alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

68 patients admitted for LIVHR repair (defect size less than 25 cm2) were randomized in two groups: group I, tacker fixation (36 patients) and group II, suture fixation (32 patients). Various intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients in the two groups were well matched in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and hernia characteristics. Mean BMI was 29.0 kg/m2. Operative time was found to be significantly higher in group II (77.5 versus 52.6 min, p=0.000). Patients in group I were found to have significantly higher pain scores at 1 h, 6 h, 24 h, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. At follow-up, incidence of seromas was higher in group II but the difference was not significant (7 versus 4, p=0.219). During long-term follow-up, patients in group II were satisfied cosmetically.

CONCLUSION

Suture fixation is a cost-effective alternative to tacker fixation, for small and medium-sized defects in anatomically accessible areas. However, suture fixation requires significantly longer operation time, but patients have statistically significantly less postoperative pain.

A comparison of a bovine albumin/glutaraldehyde glue versus fibrin sealant for hernia mesh fixation in experimental onlay and IPOM repair in rats

BACKGROUND

Research in hernia repair has targeted new atraumatic mesh fixation to reduce major complications such as chronic pain and adhesion formation. The efficacy and safety of two surgical adhesives, viz. Artiss® (FS, fibrin sealant containing 4 IU thrombin) and Bioglue® (AGG, bovine serum albumin/glutaraldehyde glue), were evaluated in this study. Primary study endpoints were tissue integration, dislocation, and adhesion formation. Foreign-body reaction formed the secondary study endpoint.

METHODS

Twenty-four polypropylene meshes (VM, Vitamesh®) were randomized to four groups (n = 6): two groups of onlay hernia repair (two meshes per animal) with mesh fixation by FS (O-FS) or by AGG (O-AGG), and two groups of IPOM repair (one mesh per animal) with mesh fixation by four sutures and FS (I-FS) or AGG (I-AGG). Eighteen rats underwent surgery. Follow-up was 30 days. Tissue integration, dislocation, seroma formation, inflammation, adhesion formation, and foreign-body reaction were assessed.

RESULTS

Meshes fixed with FS (O-FS, I-FS) showed good tissue integration. No dislocation, seroma formation, or macroscopic signs of inflammation were detectable. Adhesion formation of I-FS was significantly milder compared with I-AGG (P = 0.024). A moderate foreign-body reaction without active inflammation was seen histologically in O-FS and I-FS groups. Samples fixed with AGG (O-AGG, I-AGG) showed extensive scar formation. No dislocation and no seroma formation were observed. All of these samples showed moderate to severe signs of inflammation with abscess formation in the six meshes of O-AGG. Histology underlined these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The fibrin sealant adhesive showed very good overall results of the primary and secondary outcome parameters. FS is a recommendable atraumatic fixation tool for the surgical onlay technique. AGG provides high adhesive strength, but shows low biocompatibility. Persisting active inflammation was seen in both the O-AGG and I-AGG groups, not favoring its use for these indications.

Subsequent abdominal surgery after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh: a single institution experience with 72 reoperations

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) carries a risk of adhesion formation and can influence subsequent abdominal operations (SAOs). We performed a retrospective study of findings during reoperations of patients who had previously had an LVIHR by using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (DualMesh; WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA).

METHODS

The medical records of all 695 patients who had LVIHR at our hospital were reviewed. Patients who underwent SAO for various indications were identified (n = 72) and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven LVIHR patients (1%) had early SAO (within a few days). In six patients (86%), removal of the mesh was required. Intra-operatively, in all six of these patients with peritonitis, there were no adhesions against the implant identified. Late SAOs (after more than 1 month) were performed in 65 patients (9.4%). Only one patient required acute surgical intervention due to an LVIHR-related adhesion (0.15%). Laparoscopy was performed in 83% and laparotomy in 17% of patients. Adhesions against the implant were present in 83% of patients; in 65%, the adhesions involved omentum only, and in 18%, they involved the bowel. Adhesiolysis was always easy and caused no inadvertent enterotomies. SAOs were devoid of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this largest series of reoperations after LVIHR, the majority of patients had mild or moderate adhesions against the implant. The specific observations that: (1) no relaparoscopies had to be converted, (2) no inadvertent enterotomies were made during adhesiolysis, and (3) SAOs have practically been devoid of peri- and postoperative complications indicate that SAOs can be safely performed after previous LVIHR with DualMesh.

Eighty-five redo surgeries after 733 laparoscopic treatments for ventral and incisional hernia: adhesion and recurrence analysis

INTRODUCTION

This report reviews the clinical and functional outcomes of implanted meshes during a second-look evaluation of 85 cases after a large number (733) of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repairs (LIVHR), of which 608 were controlled throughout a period of 5 to 10 years. This report demonstrates a minimal occurrence of adhesions and a low rate of recurrences and other complications related to mesh usage.

METHODS

Eighty-five re-operated cases after LIVHR were reviewed retrospectively. In every redo surgery, the first trocar was always inserted on a lateral side, external to the previous skin incisions of the transabdominal fixations. Mueller's adhesion scale was used to estimate adhesion severity (Mueller 0 indicates no adhesion; Mueller I indicates adhesion of the omentum; and Mueller II indicates serosal adhesions). The mechanism of recurrence is of paramount interest and is analyzed herein. If recurrence was observed, the defect was closed and a larger mesh of Parietex was implanted under the previous one, with transparietal fixation achieved by pulling the threads with the Endoclose device.

RESULTS

In all of our "second-look" surgeries, the neoperitoneum perfectly covered the mesh. In 47.05% of the cases, we observed no adhesions (Mueller 0), 42.3% had adhesions of the omentum (Mueller I), and 10.58% had serosal adhesions (Mueller II). There was no shrinking or wrinkling of the prosthesis in any of the cases, confirming its total peritonization on the anterior abdominal wall. Within the first 3 years, only 4.1% of the controlled patients contracted recurrences, with a mean follow-up of 52 months.

CONCLUSION

With the double-suturing technique used for LIVHR and the use of a composite mesh, we observed a low rate of recurrences and limited side effects as compared with the use of tacks intra-abdominally. Redo surgeries after LIVHR are feasible, but care must be taken due to unpredictable mesh adhesions.

Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques

Background

Persistent, activity-limiting pain after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) appears to be related to fixation of the implanted mesh. A randomized study comparing commonly used fixation techniques with respect to postoperative pain and quality of life has not previously been reported.

Methods

A total of 199 patients undergoing non-urgent LVIHR in our unit between August 2005 and July 2008 were randomly assigned to one of three mesh-fixation groups: absorbable sutures (AS) with tacks; double crown (DC), which involved two circles of tacks and no sutures; and nonabsorbable sutures (NS) with tacks. All operations were performed by one of two experienced surgeons, who used a standardized technique and the same type of mesh and mesh-fixation materials. The severity of the patients’ pain was assessed preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated by administering a standard health survey before and 3 months after surgery. Results in the three groups were compared.

Results

The AS, DC, and NS mesh-fixation groups had similar patient demographic, hernia and operative characteristics. There were no significant differences among the groups in VAS scores at any assessment time or in the change in VAS score from preoperative to postoperative evaluations. The QoL survey data showed a significant difference among groups for only two of the eight health areas analyzed.

Conclusion

In this trial, the three mesh-fixation methods were associated with similar postoperative pain and QoL findings. These results suggest that none of the techniques can be considered to have a pain-reduction advantage over the others. Development of new methods for securing the mesh may be required to decrease the rate or severity of pain after LVIHR.

Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias located on the abdominal borders: a retrospective critical review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and results of laparoscopic approach to repair incisional hernias of the abdominal borders, the weakest points of abdominal wall.

METHODS

Since 2002 through 2008 a total of 39 patients with fascial defects of the abdominal borders underwent laparoscopic repair. The defects were suprapubic (n=18), subxiphoidal (n=15), and lateral sided (n=6). The body mass index was >oe=30 Kg/m2 in 19 patients. The parietal defects was measured both externally and from within the peritoneal cavity and 56% of meshes were fixed only by tacks, especially in suprapubic site.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 161.8+/-25 minutes. There was 1 intraoperative complication, an intestinal injury repaired laparoscopically. Conversion was needed in 1 patient for massive adhesions. Postoperative early surgical complications were 7 (1 seroma). Morbidity in obese and nonobese patients showed no statistically relevant difference (P>0.05). There was no postoperative death. Mean hospital stay was 5.1+/-3 days. The mean follow-up was 37 months and recurrence was observed in 3 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The onlay laparoscopic approach for repair of incisional hernias of the abdominal borders can warrant good results. Obesity is not a contraindication to laparoscopic repair. Anyway, further experiences are necessary to confirm these results.

Early strangulated recurrence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic repair: an old complication for a new technique

The introduction of laparoscopy in incisional hernia repair is giving rise to a new class of complications, specific of new techniques and materials. A case of early failure of incisional hernia laparoscopic repair complicated by the strangulation of a jejunal loop four months after surgery is reported. The use of inappropriate material (tacks) to fix the prosthesis to the abdominal wall, a sudden increase of intra-abdominal pressure caused by an episode of haematemesis four hours postoperatively (associated to its consequent endoscopic treatment), and the formation of rectus abdominis muscle hematoma are reported as the main factors determining the slippage of the mesh from the correct position and, ultimately, the early failure of the ventral hernia repair. Furthermore, the aetiology of early failure of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, reported in literature, is reviewed.

Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair! A prospective, observational study with 344 patients

BACKGROUND

Today, the laparoscopic approach is a standard procedure for the repair of incisional hernias. However, the direct contact of visceral organs with mesh material is a major issue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study presents the data of 344 patients treated for incisional and parastomal hernias with a new mesh made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF; Dynamesh IPOM) between May 2004 and January 2008 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The median follow-up of 297 patients after incisional hernias totaled 24 months and 20 months for 47 patients with parastomal hernias. Incisional hernias were repaired using an IPOM technique. For parastomal hernias, a recently described sandwich technique was used with two meshes implanted in an intraperitoneal onlay position.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate for incisional hernias was 2/297 = 0.6% and 1/47 = 2% for parastomal hernias. Three patients developed a secondary infection after surgical revision or puncture of a seroma. One patient had a bowel fistula through the mesh, with an abscess in the hernia sac. In all cases, the infection healed and the mesh could be preserved. No long-term mesh-related complications have been observed.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias with meshes made of PVDF (Dynamesh IPOM) revealed low recurrence and, overall, low complication rates. Especially in cases of infection, the material proved to be resistant without clinical signs of persistent bacterial contamination. Mesh-related complications did not occur during the follow-up.

Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 repairs

BACKGROUND

All hernia recurrences in a series of 505 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a ventral hernia (n=291) or incisional hernia (n=214) were analyzed to identify factors responsible for the recurrence.

METHODS

In all laparoscopic repairs, an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis overlapping the hernia margins by >or=3 cm was fixed with a double ring of tacks alone (n=206) or with tacks as well as sutures (n=299). During the mean follow-up time of 31.3 +/- 18.4 months, nine patients (1.8%) had a recurrence, eight of which were repaired laparoscopically. Operative reports and videotapes of all initial repairs and repairs of recurrences were analyzed.

RESULTS

All recurrences followed an incisional hernia repair (p<0.001). Five recurrences developed after mesh fixation with both tacks and sutures and four after mesh fixation with tacks alone (p=1.0). All recurrences were at the site of the apparently sufficient original incision scar: in eight patients, the recurrent hernia was attached to the mesh; in one, it developed in another part of the scar. All initial repairs had been performed without technical errors. Upon repair of the recurrences, a new, larger mesh was placed over the entire incision, not just the hernia. There were no re-recurrences during follow-up (mean 19.8+/-10.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence after incisional hernia repair appears to be due primarily to disregard for the principle that the whole incision--not just the hernia--must be repaired. Our experience supports the idea that the entire incision has a potential for hernia development. Insufficient coverage of the incision scar is a risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: innovative anatomical closure, mesh insertion without 10-mm transmyofascial port, and atraumatic mesh fixation: a preliminary experience of a new technique

BACKGROUND

Generous overlap by a well-transfixed mesh is important in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). Mesh is usually introduced through a 10-mm trocar and fixed by tackers or transfixed by sutures. Ten-millimeter trocar sites are more prone to hernia development. Transfixation done using a suture passer inflicts some trauma and the site may become painful. This study reports a mesh insertion technique avoiding a 10-mm myofascial port, double-breasted fascial closure of the hernial defect, and transfixation in a relatively atraumatic manner.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted by enrolling the patients attending our surgery clinic. They were candidates for LVHR. Informed consent was obtained from each patient before the procedure. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Hospital and conducted as per good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines.

RESULTS

Between April 2004 and June 2006, 29 ventral hernia patients were enrolled without any exclusion. All patients had LVHR performed with this technique. Mean operative time and hospital stay were 65 min and <1 day, respectively. There were no perioperative complications, conversion, infection, trocar site or recurrent herniation or mortality. The majority of the patients were operated on as day-care surgery. Patients were followed up telephonically for the first 48 h and then by visiting us regularly. There was no postoperative visible bulge.

CONCLUSION

Mesh insertion by avoiding 10-mm trocar, double-breasted defect closure, and transfixation using atraumatic needles is a technically easy, safe, and patient-friendly procedure.

Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: something different from a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernias after laparotomy are a large financial burden for society as well as for the patients suffering from pain and limitations of activity over time. The introduction of alloplastic materials such as polypropylene seems to improve the results. The question of whether to apply open or laparoscopic implantation of the mesh is of ongoing interest. We compare the available alloplastic materials and try to clarify the question of whether the laparoscopic procedure is superior to the conventional (open) technique based on the available randomized studies.

METHODS

All available meshes for intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal implantation were described regarding their handling and their pros and cons. A database search (PubMed, Medline, Ovid, and in the secondary literature) was carried out to retrieve all randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repair. Data were reviewed by two independent scientists for surgical and statistical design.

RESULTS

The ideal mesh for a laparoscopic maintenance of abdominal wall hernias as well as the optimal fixation of the mesh has not been found yet. Recent available literature shows no evidence demonstrating the superiority of one of these meshes. The available studies found a lower infection rate, but higher occurrence of seroma for the laparoscopic procedure. The value of the different studies is reduced due to deficiency in study design and power. Guidelines for further studies are discussed to avoid surgical and statistical pitfalls.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair shows, in some (randomized) studies as well as a large number of retrospective analyses and in case control studies, superiority compared to conventional hernia repair. Long-term results with a high level of evidence are not available. Additional well-designed randomized trials including long-term observation of patients are required in order to clarify a number of interesting questions.