Laparoscopy-assisted pancreas- and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer as compared with open total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2416-2423. [PMID: 19266232 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0371-0]

Routine clinical markers of the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response after elective operation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Operative injury to the body from all procedures causes a stereotypical cascade of neuroendocrine, cytokine, myeloid, and acute phase responses. This response has been examined commonly by the use of cortisol, interleukin-6 (IL-6), white cell count, and C-reactive protein (CRP). We aimed to determine which markers of the systemic inflammatory response were useful in determining the magnitude of injury after elective operations.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using surgery, endocrine response, systemic inflammatory response, cortisol, IL-6, white cell count, and CRP. For each analyte the studies were grouped according to whether the operative injury was considered to be minor, moderate, or major and then by the operative procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 164 studies were included involving 14,362 patients. The IL-6 and CRP responses clearly were associated with the magnitude of operative injury and the invasiveness of the operative procedure. For example, the peak CRP response increased from 52 mg/L with cholecystectomy to 123 mg/L with colorectal cancer resection, 145 mg/L with hip replacement, 163 mg/L after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and 189 mg/L after open cardiac surgery. There also appeared to be a difference between minimally invasive/laparoscopic and open procedures such as cholecystectomy (27 vs 80 mg/L), colorectal cancer resection (97 vs 133 mg/L), and aortic aneurysm repair (132 vs 180 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

Peak IL-6 and CRP concentrations consistently were associated with the magnitude of operative injury and operative procedure. These markers may be useful in the objective assessment of which components of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery are likely to improve patient outcome and to assess the possible impact of operative injury on immune function.

A systematic review of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) has been performed since 1999. Although surgical outcomes have been reported from Japan, Korea, China, and many Western countries, the effectiveness of this technique has not been conclusively established. This study therefore aimed to review the literature systematically.

METHODS

Our search of the research literature identified 150 studies, which were mostly retrospective and from single institutions.

RESULTS

There has recently been a remarkable increase in the number of studies from Korea, and the number of patients included in studies has increased since 2009. In most studies, the surgical procedures were longer, blood loss was reduced, and the number of retrieved lymph nodes was the same in the LTG group as in the open total gastrectomy group. The incidence of postoperative complications and that of inflammation during postoperative recovery were the same in these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

During LTG, the method used for esophagojejunostomy is important for surgical reliability and to reduce postoperative complications. There has been rapid development of new techniques from the level of esophagojejunostomy through a small skin incision to the high level of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using various techniques. A nationwide prospective phase II study is urgently needed to establish the value of LTG.

International multicenter experience with an over-the-scope clipping device for endoscopic management of GI defects (with video)

BACKGROUND

The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) provides more durable and full-thickness closure as compared with standard clips. Only case reports and small case series have reported on outcomes of OTSC closure of GI defects.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a large, multicenter experience with OTSCs for the management of GI defects. Secondary goals were to determine success rate by type of defect and type of therapy and to determine predictors of treatment outcomes.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective study.

SETTING

Multiple, international, academic centers.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients who underwent attempted OTSC placement for GI defects, either as a primary or as a rescue therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

OTSC placement to attempt closure of GI defects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Long-term success of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients (108 fistulae, 48 perforations, 32 leaks) were included. Long-term success was achieved in 60.2% of patients during a median follow-up of 146 days. Rate of successful closure of perforations (90%) and leaks (73.3%) was significantly higher than that of fistulae (42.9%) (P < .05). Long-term success was significantly higher when OTSCs were applied as primary therapy (primary 69.1% vs rescue 46.9%; P = .004). On multivariate analysis, patients who had OTSC placement for perforations and leaks had significantly higher long-term success compared with those who had fistulae (OR 51.4 and 8.36, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and multiple operators with variable expertise with the OTSC device.

CONCLUSION

OTSC is safe and effective therapy for closure of GI defects. Clinical success is best achieved in patients undergoing closure of perforations or leaks when OTSC is used for primary or rescue therapy. Type of defect is the best predictor of successful long-term closure.

A multi-institutional analysis of open versus minimally-invasive surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma: results of the US gastric cancer collaborative

BACKGROUND

Surgical experience with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has increased; however, published reports on MIS resection of gastric adenocarcinoma are limited.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2012, 880 patients who underwent surgical resection of gastric adenocarcinoma were identified from a multi-institutional database. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were stratified by operative approach (open vs. MIS) and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 70 (8 %) patients had a MIS approach. Patients who underwent a MIS resection were more likely to have a smaller tumor (open 4.5 cm vs. MIS 3.0 cm, p < 0.001). MIS resections were associated with lower estimated blood loss (open 250 cc vs. MIS 150 cc) and longer operative time (open 232 min vs. MIS 271 min) compared with open surgery (both p < 0.05). An R0 resection was achieved in most patients (open 90.9 % vs. MIS 98.6 %, p = 0.03) and median lymph node yield was good in both groups (open 17 vs. MIS 14, p = 0.10). MIS had a similar incidence of complications (open 33.1 % vs. MIS 20 %, p = 0.07) and a similar length of stay (open 9 days vs. MIS 7 days, p = 0.13) compared with open surgery. In the propensity-matched analysis, median recurrence-free and overall were not impacted by operative approach.

CONCLUSION

An MIS approach to gastric cancer was associated with adequate lymph node retrieval, a high incidence of R0 resection, and comparable long-term oncological outcomes versus open gastrectomy.

Huang's three-step maneuver for laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer

Due to the complexity of the splenic hilar vessels, their anatomical variation and the narrow and deep space, as well as the bleeding-prone splenic parenchyma and the difficulty to manage splenic or vascular bleeding at the splenic hilum,the procedure remains challenging and technically demanding procedure for the performance of laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph nodes dissection. Based on our experiences, we gradually explored a set of procedural operation steps called "Huang's three-step maneuver". In this paper, we not only provide the concrete operation steps for the surgeon, but we also provide our recommended technique of pulling and exposure for assistants. This new maneuver simplifies the complicated procedure and improves the efficiency of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, making it easier to master and allowing for its widespread adoption.

Is laparoscopic total gastrectomy a safe operation? A review of various anastomotic techniques and their outcomes

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is an accepted option for gastric cancer surgery; however, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is not widely performed. There is concern about the safety of the operation due to the difficulty of extracorporeal reconstruction through a mini-laparotomy. Efforts have been made to establish an intracorporeal anastomotic technique for esophagojejunostomy. This article reviews the current techniques available for laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy and their surgical outcomes. Several different techniques using either circular or linear staplers have been reported; however, the apparent superiority of any particular method has not been confirmed. The incidence of anastomosis-related complications varied among studies, but different techniques all successfully achieved excellent outcomes. The overall complication rate of LTG was similar to that of open total gastrectomy, suggesting that LTG is a safe and feasible option. However, the feasibility of LTG with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced upper gastric cancer needs to be confirmed in further studies, because most of the patients included in the LTG studies were diagnosed with early stages of disease.

Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure

BACKGROUND

Robotic systems recently have been introduced to overcome technical limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery, especially for complex procedures. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node (LN) dissection (LTGD2) is one of the most complicated procedures. We hypothesized that robotic LN dissection would be more thorough and accurate. We compared robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy with D2 LN dissection (RTGD2) with LTGD2 to investigate the impact of robotics.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic characteristics and short-term and long-term outcomes of RTGD2 (n = 51) versus LTGD2 (n = 58) in gastric adenocarcinoma patients were extracted from a prospectively designed database and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

There was no difference of patients' characteristics between groups. Mean operation time of RTGD2 was longer than LTGD2 (p < 0.001), and no differences in tumor histology, size, location, and TNM stage were seen. Total retrieved LNs from RTGD2 was similar to LTGD2 (mean 47.2 vs. 42.8, respectively), as were retrieved LNs at splenic hilum (1.3 vs. 0.8). However, mean numbers of retrieved LNs along the splenic artery from RTGD2 was higher than LTGD2 (2.3 vs. 1.0, respectively; p = 0.013), as was also the case at the splenic hilum and artery (3.6 vs. 1.9, p = 0.014). Postoperative complication (16 vs. 22 %, p = 0.374) and overall and disease-free survival between the two groups were not significantly different (p = 0.767 and p = 0.666, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy with D2 LN dissection is feasible. Operation time and retrieved total LNs and splenic hilar LNs in the robotic procedure are acceptable.

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy performed by following the perigastric fascias and the intrafascial space for advanced upper-third gastric cancer

Background

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPL) is required in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer. However, it is considerably difficult and risk in clinical practice. Thus, we explore the application of LSPL performed by following the perigastric fascias and the intrafascial space in D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced upper-third gastric cancer.

Methods

From July 2010 to December 2012, 109 patients with T2–3 upper-third gastric cancer underwent LSPL. Of these patients, 55 underwent classic LSPL (classic group), and the remaining 54 patients underwent LSPL performed by following the fascias and intrafascial space (fascia group). Clinicopathologic characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). All of the operations were successful without conversion to laparotomy. The operation time, mean splenic hilar lymph node (LN) dissection time, mean total blood loss and mean blood loss from splenic hilar LN dissection were significantly lower in the fascia group than in the classic group (P<0.05), whereas the times to first flatus, fluid diet and soft diet and the duration of hospital stay were similar in both groups. The mean number of harvested LNs (No. 10 and No. 11d) was slightly higher in the fascia group, but the difference was not significant. No significant difference in morbidity was found between the fascia group and the classic group (9.3% vs.10.9%, P>0.05). At a median follow-up of 12 months(range 5 to 35 months), none of the patients had died or experienced recurrent or metastatic disease.

Conclusion

LSPL performed by following the fascias and intrafascial space is an optimal and safe technique based on anatomical logic, and it reduces the difficulties associated with LSPL, making it easier to master and allowing its widespread adoption.

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving no. 10 lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer using a left approach

BACKGROUND

We developed a novel procedure for spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node (LN) dissection, which is difficult and advocates for patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer, except those with direct tumor extension to the spleen or definite LN metastasis at the splenic hilum.

METHODS

The surgeon reveals the splenic vessels (SVs), and the assistant pulls up the lymphatic fatty tissue on the surface of the lower lobar vessels of the spleen (LLVSs). The surgeon then exposes the left gastroepiploic vessels (LGEVs), completely separating the LLVSs from the LGEV roots. After tracking the SV termini, the No. 11d LNs are carefully dissected and the upper lobar vessels of the spleen are exposed from their roots to the upper pole of the spleen. During this process, 2-4 branches of the short gastric vessels are skeletonized and divided at their roots. The LNs behind the SVs in front of Gerota's fascia are then dissected. The above procedure was performed on 118 consecutive patients with stage cT2-3 disease.

RESULTS

Mean operation time was 20.4 ± 6.0 min (range 13-41 min), mean blood loss was 13.6 ± 4.0 ml (range 10-40 ml), and mean times to first flatus, fluid diet, and soft diet were 3.3 ± 1.2 days (range 2-8 days), 4.8 ± 1.6 days (range 3-14 days), and 8.1 ± 4.1 days (range 6-20 days), respectively. A mean 44.6 ± 17.3 LNs (range 22-103) were retrieved, including a mean 3.0 ± 2.4 (range 0-11) splenic hilar area LNs. At a median follow-up of 9 months, no patients had died or experienced recurrent or metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure is feasible and simplifies complicated laparoscopic No. 10 LN dissection.

Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis

Objective

To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG).

Background

Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it is necessary to update the meta-analysis of this subject.

Methods

Original articles compared LTG and OTG for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to July 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, analgesic medication, first flatus day, first oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using STATA version 10.1.

Results

17 studies were selected in this analysis, which included a total of 2313 patients (955 in LTG and 1358 in OTG). LTG showed longer operative time, less blood loss, fewer analgesic uses, earlier passage of flatus, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier hospital discharge, and reduced postoperative morbidity. The number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, hospital mortality, 5-year OS and DFS were similar.

Conclusion

LTG had the benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity, at the price of longer operative time. There were no statistical differences in lymph node dissection, resection margin, hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes, which indicated the similar oncological safety with OTG. A positive trend was indicated towards LTG. So LTG can be performed as an alternative to OTG by the experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Whereas, due to the relative small sample size of long-term outcomes and lack of randomized control trials, more studies are required.

Preoperative dual-phase 3D CT angiography assessment of the right hepatic artery before gastrectomy

PURPOSES

In the current study, we evaluated the efficacy of dual-phase three-dimensional (3D) CT angiography (CTA) in the assessment of the vascular anatomy, especially the right hepatic artery (RHA), before gastrectomy.

METHODS

The study initially included 714 consecutive patients being treated for gastric cancer. A dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan using 32-multi detector-row CT was performed for all patients.

RESULTS

Among the 714 patients, 3D CTA clearly identified anomalies with the RHA arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in 49 cases (6.9 %). In Michels' classification type IX, the common hepatic artery (CHA) originates only from the SMA. Such cases exhibit defective anatomy for the CHA in conjunction with the celiac-splenic artery system, resulting in direct exposure of the portal vein beneath the #8a lymph node station, which was retrospectively confirmed by video in laparoscopic gastrectomy cases. Fused images of both 3D angiography and venography were obtained, and could have predicted the risk preoperatively, and the surgical finding confirmed its usefulness.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative evaluations using 3D CTA can provide more accurate information about the vessel anatomy. The fused images from 3D CTA have the potential to reduce the intraoperative risks for injuries to critical vessel, such as the portal vein, during gastrectomy.

Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for gastric cancer is not yet widespread because of the technical difficulty of reconstruction. We have performed LATG on 100 patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. This study investigated the short-term outcomes of LATG.

METHODS

Between September 2001 and September 2012, 100 patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer underwent LATG with D1 plus beta or D2 lymphadenectomy. Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy was performed intracorporeally using end-to-side anastomosis with a circular stapler (the purse-string suture method). The primary endpoint was the proportion of postoperative complications during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Mean operation time was 249 min; mean blood loss was 182 ml. There were no conversions to open surgery. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, there were 8 grade II (8 %) and 10 grade IIIa/b (10 %) complications. There were no treatment-related deaths or grade IV complications. The most frequent complication was anastomotic or stump leakage (6 %), followed by pancreatic fistula (5 %). Reoperations were required in two patients with leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term outcomes of LATG in our study involving 100 patients were outlined. LATG for gastric cancer patients should be attempted preferably in a clinical trial setting by surgeons with sufficient experience in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Safety of transorally-inserted anvil for esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

To assess the safety of transorally-inserted anvil (TOA) for use during esophagojejunostomy (EJ) reconstruction during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG).

METHODS

Between March 2009 and December 2011, 39 consecutive open total gastrectomies (OTGs) and 36 LTGs using TOA for gastric cancer were comparatively evaluated. We investigated postoperative complications, using the Clavien-Dindo classification. To evaluate the effect of a learning period in using TOA for LTG, we also investigated shifts in the patterns of complications and changes in total operation time over the course of the study.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics at baseline were not different between both groups, except for the extent of lymphadenectomy (P < 0.001) and depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that TOA usage elevated the occurrence of infectious complications significantly (OR = 3.32, P = 0.042), but was not associated with EJ-related complications. TOA usage did not need a learning period for the length of time required to complete the operation, or the likelihood of developing an EJ-related or infectious complication.

CONCLUSIONS

TOA use for EJ during LTG is relatively simple and easy enough not to require a learning period for surgeons. This procedure did not elevated the occurrence of EJ-related complications compared to circular stapling in open surgery, but it does require special prevention efforts to avoid infectious complications.

Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer.

METHODS: Major databases such as Medline (PubMed), Embase, Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), Science Citation Index Expanded and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing LTG and OTG from January 1994 to May 2013. Evaluated endpoints were operative, postoperative and oncological outcomes. Operative outcomes included operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative recovery included time to first flatus, time to first oral intake, hospital stay and analgesics use. Postoperative complications comprised morbidity, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, ileus, bleeding, abdominal abscess, wound problems and mortality. Oncological outcomes included positive resection margins, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and proximal and distal resection margins. The pooled effect was calculated using either a fixed effects or a random effects model.

RESULTS: Fifteen non-randomized comparative studies with 2022 patients were included (LTG - 811, OTG - 1211). Both groups had similar short-term oncological outcomes, analgesic use (WMD -0.09; 95%CI: -2.39-2.20; P = 0.94) and mortality (OR = 0.74; 95%CI: 0.24-2.31; P = 0.61). However, LTG was associated with a lower intraoperative blood loss (WMD -201.19 mL; 95%CI: -296.50--105.87 mL; P < 0.0001) and overall complication rate (OR = 0.73; 95%CI: 0.57-0.92; P = 0.009); fewer wound-related complications (OR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.21-0.72; P = 0.002); a quicker recovery of gastrointestinal motility with shorter time to first flatus (WMD -0.82; 95%CI: -1.18--0.45; P < 0.0001) and oral intake (WMD -1.30; 95%CI: -1.84--0.75; P < 0.00001); and a shorter hospital stay (WMD -3.55; 95%CI: -5.13--1.96; P < 0.0001), albeit with a longer operation time (WMD 48.25 min; 95%CI: 31.15-65.35; P < 0.00001), as compared with OTG.

CONCLUSION: LTG is safe and effective, and may offer some advantages over OTG in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term results of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery for primary early gastric cancer (EGC) at a single high-volume institution.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic and survival data of primary gastric cancer patients who underwent a minimally invasive radical gastrectomy at Seoul National University Hospital from December 2003 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. For comparison of short-term outcomes, the data for 1,112 patients who underwent a radical open gastrectomy from 2007 to 2011 were collected. For long-term outcome analysis, the data for 962 patients who underwent a radical open gastrectomy from 2004 to 2006 were collected. Because the application of MIS was limited to suspected EGC, the control groups were similarly limited to patients deemed to have EGC as shown by preoperative endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, or both.

RESULTS

The review of our database identified 1,013 patients who had undergone MIS for gastric cancer. In the short-term outcome analysis, the MIS group showed statistically better results than the open surgery group in terms of postoperative hospital stay (8.7 vs. 11.3 days; p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (75.4 vs. 142.3 ml; p < 0.001), and overall complication rate (17.5 vs. 24.4 %; p < 0.001). In the subset analysis of total gastrectomy, the local complication rate was much higher in the MIS group than in the open surgery group. Both uni- and multivariate analyses showed that not only the surgical approach but also age, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease, and additional organ resection had significant effects on complications. In the long-term outcome analysis, the two groups showed comparable disease-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MIS for EGC showed a shorter operation time, a shorter postoperative hospital stay, and a lower overall complication rate than open surgery but a comparable disease-free survival rate. Total gastrectomy in the MIS group was associated with a higher complication rate than in the open group. Therefore, a new stable surgical technique needs to be established.

Laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy using the EndoStitch and a circular stapler under a direct view created by the ENDOCAMELEON

Laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler is associated with technical difficulties in the purse-string sutures used to insert the anvil head and in obtaining an adequate visual field to prevent rolling the mesentery and the wall of the jejunum on the mesenteric side into the anastomosis. To overcome these difficulties, we used the EndoStitch to create the purse-string suture and the ENDOCAMELEON to create the visual field to stretch the jejunum. After resecting the esophagus, purse-string sutures were placed using the EndoStitch. A total of five to six needle deliveries were performed. Next, the anvil head was inserted into the esophagus. The main unit of the EEA was inserted from the end of the resected jejunum. Then, the scope was changed to the ENDOCAMELEON. The main unit was slowly moved toward the anvil head. After making sure that the mesentery and the wall of the jejunum on the mesenteric side were not rolled into the anastomosis under the visual field created by the ENDOCAMELEON, the main unit was then fired. Thereafter, esophagojejunostomy was successfully completed. This technique was applied in 20 patients between April 2010 and May 2012. Laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer was completed in all 20 patients. No case required conversion to open surgery. Neither anastomotic leakage nor stenosis was observed. This method is simple and useful for laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 dissection (LTGD2) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection (OTGD2).

BACKGROUND

More surgeons have chosen laparoscopic total gastrectomy as an alternative to open total gastrectomy. But no meta-analysis has been performed to evaluate the value of LTGD2.

METHODS

Original articles compared LTGD2 and OTGD2 for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to March 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, analgesic medication, first flatus day, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and hospital mortality were compared using STATA version 10.1.

RESULTS

8 studies were selected in this analysis. A total of 1,498 patients were included (559 in LTG and 939 in OTG). LTGD2 showed longer operative time (WMD 39.29; 95 % CI 20.52, 58.06; P < 0.001), less blood loss (WMD -157.94; 95 % CI -245.25 -70.62; P < 0.001), fewer analgesic requirements (WMD -2.01; 95 % CI -3.10, -0.93; P < 0.001), earlier passage of flatus (WMD -0.73; 95 % CI -1.19, -0.27; P = 0.002), earlier hospital discharge (WMD -2.69; 95 % CI -3.42, -1.97; P < 0.001), and reduced postoperative morbidity (RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.50, 0.98; P = 0.035). The number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD 0.27; 95 % CI -1.43, 1.98; P = 0.752) and hospital mortality rate (RR 0.57; 95 % CI 0.11, 3.09; P = 0.513) were similar.

CONCLUSION

LTGD2 was associated with less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay, and reduced postoperative morbidity, at the expense of longer operative time. No statistical differences were observed in lymph node dissection, and hospital mortality, which indicated the similar ability of lymph nodes clearance and short-term outcomes with OTGD2. A positive trend was indicated toward LTGD2. So we encourage the experienced surgeons to achieve LTGD2 instead of OTGD2. Whereas, due to non-randomized control trails and lack of long-term outcomes, more studies are required.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) and open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric cancer.

METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and BIOSIS Previews was performed to identify studies that compared LATG and OTG. The following factors were checked: operating time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, flatus time, hospital stay, mortality and morbidity. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were carried out using RevMan 5.1 software.

RESULTS: Nine studies with 1221 participants were included (436 LATG and 785 OTG). Compared to OTG, LATG involved a longer operating time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 57.68 min, 95%CI: 30.48-84.88; P < 0.001]; less blood loss [standard mean difference (SMD) = -1.71; 95%CI: -2.48 - -0.49; P < 0.001]; earlier time to flatus (WMD= -0.76 d; 95%CI: -1.22 - -0.30; P < 0.001); shorter hospital stay (WMD = -2.67 d; 95%CI: -3.96 - -1.38, P < 0.001); and a decrease in medical complications (RR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.19-0.90, P = 0.03). The number of harvested lymph nodes, mortality, surgical complications, cancer recurrence rate and long-term survival rate of patients undergoing LATG were similar to those in patients undergoing OTG.

CONCLUSION: Despite a longer operation, LATG can be performed safely in experienced surgical centers with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than open surgery.

Laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) is a safe or better alternative to open total gastrectomy (OTG) for the treatment of gastric cancer. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LATG by pooling comparative studies of LATG and OTG in a meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Original articles comparing LATG and OTG for gastric cancer, published in the English language since 1990, were searched for in PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. The outcome variables analyzed were number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, 5-year survival, operative time, blood loss, time of analgesic use, first flatus day, and postoperative hospital stay.

RESULTS

Eight studies were considered suitable for the meta-analysis, for a total of 1161 patients (409 LATG and 752 OTG). Compared with OTG, LATG showed a similar number of lymph nodes harvested, morbidity, and postoperative mortality. There was also no difference in 5-year overall and disease-specific survival between groups, according to two enrolled studies where such data were available. LATG required longer operative times than OTG but also resulted in significantly less blood loss, earlier return of bowel function, less time of analgesics use, and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that LATG in the treatment of gastric cancer is similar in safety and efficacy to OTG. LATG has the advantages of less blood loss and faster postoperative recovery, at the expense of a longer operative time.

Laparoscopic splenic hilum lymph node dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer: A modified approach for pancreas- and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy

AIM: To investigate the feasibility and optimal approach for laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph node dissection in advanced proximal gastric cancer.

METHODS: Between August 2009 and August 2012, 12 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer treated in Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China were enrolled and subsequently underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph node (LN) dissection. The clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative course and follow-up data of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed in the study.

RESULTS: Based on our anatomical understanding of peripancreatic structures, we combined the characteristics of laparoscopic surgery and developed a modified approach (combined supra- and infra-pancreatic approaches) for laparoscopic pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilum LN dissection. Surgery was completed in all 12 patients laparoscopically without conversion. Only one patient experienced intraoperative bleeding when dissecting LNs along the splenic artery and was handled with laparoscopic hemostasis. The mean operating time was 268.4 min and mean number of retrieved splenic hilum LNs was 4.8. One patient had splenic hilum LN metastasis (8.3%). Neither postoperative morbidity nor mortality was observed. Peritoneal metastasis occurred in one patient and none of the other patients died or experienced recurrent disease during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilum LN dissection using the modified approach for advanced proximal gastric cancer could be safely achieved.

Laparoscopy-assisted vs. open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and technical aspects of a case-control study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of studies comparing laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and conventional open distal gastrectomy have been reported; the technical feasibility and clinical efficacy have been confirmed. However, few data are available to compare laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) and open techniques for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study is to compare the oncologic efficacy and long-term outcomes of LATG vs. open total gastrectomy (OTG) for AGC and to provide our experiences regarding these surgical difficulties as well.

METHODS

Using data from a clinical database of all operations performed in our department by a special surgical team, we retrospectively analysed data from 117 cases of LATG and matched OTG performed between January 2004 and December 2010. This analysis was a case-control study in which patients in the two groups were matched according to tumour location, age, gender, BMI and TNM stage via a propensity score matching method. Patient clinical characteristics, lymph node retrieval, early postoperative complications, recurrence and long-term outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The demographics, preoperative data and characteristics of the tumour were similar in both groups. No significant differences were found in the LATG group compared with the OTG group with regard to the number of retrieved lymph nodes or distance from the proximal margin. Operating time was longer in the LATG group than in the OTG group (292.8 ± 49.5 vs. 242.1 ± 47.4, p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between LATG and OTG with regard to blood loss, postoperative hospitalisation and times of analgesic injection. The early postoperative complication rates in the LATG group were significantly lower than in the OTG group (11.1 vs. 16.3 %, p < 0.05). Operative mortality was zero in both groups. During a median follow-up of 61.2 (range, 6-84) months, the overall 5-year survival rates in the LATG group and OTG group were 49.3 and 46.5 %, respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.756).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that LATG is technically feasible for advanced gastric cancer patients and can yield good short- and long-term oncologic outcomes as compared with conventional OTG.

Stable purse-string suturing using an anterior esophagotomy for reconstruction with a circular stapler during laparoscopic total gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

During a laparoscopic total gastrectomy, the combined process of purse-string suture placement and anvil insertion of a circular stapler is one of the most difficult steps in the reconstruction. We have developed a stable and reliable technique in which purse-string suture placement and anvil insertion using anterior esophagotomy precede complete transection of the esophagus.

METHODS

The procedure involves tying the distal esophagus, insufflating the esophagus via a nasogastric tube, anterior wall purse-string suture, anterior esophagotomy, posterior wall purse-string suture, anvil insertion, fastening purse-string suture, and transecting the esophagus. The technique has been employed in nine patients since April 2011.

RESULTS

Eight of the nine gastrectomies were for patients with stage IA early gastric cancer and one was for a patient with medically intractable bleeding from multiple polyps. Three were men and six were women. Average BMI was 25.2 ± 5.3 (range, 16.3-33.9). Mean operation time was 276.2 ± 56.3 min (range, 215.0-395.0 min) and the mean duration for anvil insertion was 29.8 ± 7.0 min (range, 23.0-46.0 min). There were no intraoperative or postoperative anastomosis-related complications or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our method of anvil insertion of a circular stapler can be a good option for safe and reliable esophagojejunostomy during a laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The double-stapling technique (DST) for esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil; Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) is one of the reconstruction methods used after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG). This technique has potential advantages in terms of less invasive surgery without the need to create a complicated intraabdominal anastomosis.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2011, 262 patients with gastric cancer underwent total gastrectomy and reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis, and 52 patients underwent LATG with DST. A retrospective analysis then was performed comparing the patients who experienced postoperative stenosis after LATG-DST (positive group) and the patients who did not (negative group). A comparative analysis was performed among patients comparing conventional open total gastrectomy and LATG, and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for the development of anastomotic stenosis.

RESULTS

A minor leak was found in 1 patient (1.9 %), and 11 patients experienced anastomotic stenosis (21 %) after LATG with DST. Among the patients with anastomotic stenosis, three (3/4, 75 %) anastomoses were performed with the 21-mm end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler, and eight anastomoses were performed (8/47, 17 %) with the 25-mm EEA stapler. The median interval to the diagnosis of anastomotic stenosis was 43 days after surgery. The patients with stenosis needed endoscopic balloon dilation an average of four times, and the rate of perforation after dilation was 13 %. The clinical and operative characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Anastomotic stenosis after open total gastrectomy occurred in two cases (0.98 %). Multivariate analysis showed that the size of the EEA stapler and the use of DST were risk factors for anastomotic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Esophagojejunostomy using DST with OrVil is useful in performing a minimally invasive procedure but carries a high risk of anastomotic stenosis.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has not yet gained widespread acceptance because of difficulties in performing D2 lymphadenectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy in treating AGC.

METHODS

A total of 94 patients who underwent LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC between January 2005 and October 2011 were included in this study. The patient data were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Morbidity was stratified by the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

Concurrent pancreatectomy or splenectomy was performed on 48 patients. The median operation time was 230 min, and the median number of lymph nodes harvested per patient was 60.5. The TNM stages of the tumor were Ib in 9 patients (9.6 %), IIa in 16 (17 %), IIb in 7 (7.4 %), IIIa in 16 (17 %), IIIb in 17 (18.1 %), IIIc in 25 (26.6 %), and IV in 4 (4.3 %). Major morbidity (≥ grade IIIa) occurred in 9 patients (9.6 %) without postoperative mortality. At last follow-up, tumor recurrence had occurred in 13 patients with a median follow-up time of 12.77 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The acceptable rate of major morbidity in our series suggested that laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is applicable to AGC. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to validate long-term outcome.

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) has been used more frequently despite the associated technical difficulty and concerns over oncological safety. This study was undertaken to compare the short- and long-term surgical outcomes following either LATG or open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 120 LATG and 228 OTG were retrospectively matched with respect to sex, age (±5 years), and pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage for comparison of the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The total complication rate among 120 LATG and 228 OTG was 18.3 % (22/120) and 16.2 % (37/228), respectively. The most common complication after LATG was anastomotic-related complication (6.7 %); five anastomotic leakages (4.2 %) and three anastomotic strictures were reported (2.5 %). That after OTG was wound complication (3.5 %), including seroma or infection. Matched patients analysis: Time to first gas passing and time to the resumption of a soft diet were significantly shorter in the LATG group than in the OTG group. The postoperative hospital stay of LATG was shorter in the LATG group (9.3 ± 4.2 days) than in the OTG group (11.7 ± 7.3 days; p = 0.057). Among matched patients, there was no significant difference between complication rate (24 vs. 32 %; p = 0.504) or leakage rate (6 vs. 4 %). During median follow-up of 50 (range, 10-92) months, there was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate between the matched groups, respectively (94.5 vs. 87.1 %: p = 0.148). As for patients with TNM stage I gastric cancer, the disease-free survival rate (100 vs. 90.9 %; p = 0.5) and the cumulative survival rate (91.5 vs. 95.2 %; p = 0.618) did not differ significantly between the LATG and OTG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LATG for gastric cancer has the advantage over an OTG in terms of better short-term outcomes and similar long-term outcome. LATG is an acceptable alternative to OTG for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVilTM): A single institution experience

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) using trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil^TM) in terms of operative characteristics and short term outcomes.

RESULTS: Characteristics of 27 patients with gastric cancer who underwent LATG from October 2009 to October 2012 in the Foshan Affiliated Hospital of South Medical University were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, six were reconstructed by mini-laparotomy and 21 by OrVil^TM. The clinicopathological characteristics, total operation time, total blood loss, abdominal incision and complications of anastomosis including stenosis and leakage, were compared between the groups undergoing LATG with OrVil^TM and the group undergoing mini-laparotomy.

RESULTS: The operations were successfully performed on all the patients without intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery. Two (10%) patients received palliative procedure under laparoscope who were prepared for LATG preoperatively. One case had hepatic metastatic carcinoma and 1 case had tumor recurrence near the anastomosis 8 mo after surgery. The mean follow-up duration was 10 mo (range, 2-24 mo). Operation time was significantly reduced by the use of OrVil^TM (198.42 ± 30.28 min vs 240.83 ± 8.23 min). The postoperative course with regard to occurrence of stenosis and leakage was not different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss. The upper abdominal incision was smaller in OrVil^TM group than in mini-laparotomy group (4.31 ± 0.45 cm vs 6.43 ± 0.38 cm).

CONCLUSION: LATG using OrVil^TM is a technically feasible surgical procedure with sufficient lymph node dissection, less operation time and acceptable morbidity.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The possible advantages of laparoscopic (assisted) total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) have not been reviewed systematically. The aim of this study was to systematically review the short-term outcomes of LTG versus OTG in the treatment of gastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Embase was conducted. All original studies comparing LTG with OTG were included for critical appraisal. Data describing short-term outcomes were pooled and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of eight original studies that compared LTG (n = 314) with OTG (n = 384) in patients with gastric cancer fulfilled quality criteria and were selected for review and meta-analysis. LTG compared with OTG was associated with a significant reduction of intraoperative blood loss (weighted mean difference = 227.6 ml; 95 % CI 144.3-310.9; p < 0.001), a reduced risk of postoperative complications (risk ratio = 0.51; 95 % CI 0.33-0.77), and shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference 4.0 = days; 95 % CI 1.4-6.5; p < 0.001). These benefits were at the cost of longer operative time (weighted mean difference = 55.5 min; 95 % CI 24.8-86.2; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rates were comparable for LTG (0.9 %) and OTG (1.8 %) (risk ratio = 0.68; 95 % CI 0.20-2.36).

CONCLUSION

LTG shows better short term outcomes compared with OTG in eligible patients with gastric cancer. Future studies should evaluate 30- and 60-day mortality, radicality of resection, and long-term follow-up in LTG versus OTG, preferably in randomized trials.

Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma, this study compared short-term surgical outcomes between LTG and open total gastrectomy (OTG) using the propensity score matching method.

STUDY DESIGN

After generating propensity scores given the covariates of age, sex, body mass index, comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, operators, and tumor stage, 122 patients with LTG were matched to 122 OTG patients using the nearest available score matching. Operative outcomes and hospital courses were compared in the matched groups and in the subgroups by the extent of lymph node dissection (LND).

RESULTS

The 2 study groups were well balanced with respect to the baseline characteristics of the propensity score derivation model. In the analysis of overall patients, the LTG group showed significantly longer operating time (289 vs 203 min, p < 0.001), but postoperative outcomes, including hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality, were similar in the 2 groups. In the subgroup with D1 + ß LND (perigastric nodes + Nos. 7, 8a, 9, 11p), the LTG group showed no significant differences in hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality from the OTG group. However, in the subgroup with D2 LND (perigastric nodes + Nos. 7, 8a, 9, 10, 11p, 11d, 12a), the LTG group showed significantly increased morbidity (52.6% vs 21.0%, p = 0.007) and tendency toward increased length of hospital stay and mortality as compared with the OTG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a safe and feasible technique for treatment of upper gastric carcinoma. However, LTG with D2 LND for upper gastric cancer may increase the operative risk and requires considerable experience in laparoscopic surgery.

Modified techniques and early outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy with side-to-side esophagojejunostomy

BACKGROUND

Construction of an esophagojejunostomy is a major concern in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG). Use of a circular stapler can be technically challenging in laparoscopic procedures. We aimed to introduce our modified techniques and to assess the early outcomes following TLTG with side-to-side esophagojejunostomy using a linear stapler in patients with gastric cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

From December 2010 to June 2011, 27 patients who underwent TLTG for gastric cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical time, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 59.1 years, and the average body mass index was 24.6 kg/m(2). The mean operating time was 126.2 minutes, and the hospital stay averaged 8.1 days. No conversion to open laparotomy was required. There were 2 luminal bleeding cases and 1 intra-abdominal bleeding case, but all were successfully managed with conservative treatment only. No patient experienced reoperation, anastomosis leakage, stricture, duodenal stump leakage, or wound problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Our TLTG with side-to-side esophagojejunostomy method can be a feasible and safe option for patients with gastric cancer.

Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center

BACKGROUND

Despite the popularity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains a challenging procedure because of its technical difficulties and possible complications. In this study, the authors evaluated the short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of LTG.

METHODS

The records of 118 patients who underwent LTG for middle or upper gastric cancer were retrieved from a prospectively constructed database of 1,064 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between 2007 and 2011. Surgical outcomes of LTG, such as operative results, postoperative courses, morbidities, and mortality, were investigated and compared with those of LDG patients.

RESULTS

Of the 118 LTG patients, one underwent open conversion and three experienced an intraoperative complication. Mean operating time was 292 ± 88 min, and the mean total number of harvested lymph nodes was 41 ± 16. As compared with the LDG group, the LTG group had a significantly longer operation time (292 vs. 220 min, p < 0.001), and significantly more intraoperative blood loss (256 vs. 191 ml, p = 0.002). The overall morbidity rate after LTG was 22.9%, which was significantly higher than after LDG (12.7%, p = 0.002). There were two postoperative mortalities in the LTG group. The most common complications after LTG were anastomosis leakage (n = 9) and luminal bleeding (n = 9), which were followed by anastomosis stricture (n = 4) and abdominal infection (n = 3). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that old age [≥60 years, odds ratio (OR) = 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95-6.84], intraoperative blood loss >200 ml (OR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.14-9.70), and D2 lymphadenectomy (OR = 3.87, 95% CI = 1.30-11.55) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after LTG.

CONCLUSIONS

LTG is a feasible and acceptable procedure for treatment of middle or upper early gastric cancer. Further refinement of anastomosis techniques and considerable experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy are required for proper application of LTG in gastric carcinoma.

Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the future standard of care

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer was first reported by Kitano et al. in 1991. Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) and intragastric mucosal resection (IGMR) were quickly adapted for gastric cancer limited to the mucosal layer and having no risk of lymph node metastasis. Following improvements in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the use of LWR and IGMR for these indications decreased, and patients with gastric cancer, including those with a risk of lymph node metastases, were more likely to be managed with laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) with lymph node dissection. Many retrospective comparative trials and randomized-controlled trials (RCT) have confirmed that LG is safe and feasible, and that short-term outcomes are better than those of open gastrectomy (OG) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). However, these trials did not include a satisfactory number of patients to establish clinical evidence. Thus, additional multicenter randomized-controlled trials are needed to delineate significantly quantifiable differences between LG and OG. As laparoscopic experience has accumulated, the indications for LG have been broadened to include older and overweight patients and those with advanced gastric cancer. Moreover, advanced techniques, such as laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy, laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy, laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), and extended lymph node dissection (D2) have been widely performed.In the near future, sentinel node navigation and robotic surgery will become additional options in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) involving LG. Such developments will improve the quality of life of patients following gastric cancer surgery.

Endoscopy-assisted anastomosis: a modified technique for laparoscopic side-to-side esophagojejunostomy following a total gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Esophagojejunostomy with a circular stapling device is sometimes difficult to perform in a laparoscopic setting. On the other hand, a side-to-side anastomosis with a linear stapling device is technically challenging.

METHODS

Between June 2002 and March 2008, 10 consecutive patients underwent a laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy using a side-to-side anastomosis technique. Of these patients, four underwent a laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with a modified anastomosis technique. A small wound was created on the antimesenteric side of the jejunum 5 cm distal to the resected portion and then in the lower esophagus. A peroral endoscope was advanced to the hole, and the cartridge fork was introduced into the lower esophagus under endoscopic guidance. The device (45 mm, blue) was fired to create an antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis. The common entry hole was closed by transecting the jejunum and the esophagus with another linear stapler and by using an endoscope as a stent.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent the modified procedure and did not require an open procedure. One patient developed a pancreatic fistula, which was treated conservatively. The average operative time, reconstruction time and blood loss were 483 ± 133 minutes, 139 ± 31 minutes, and 199 ± 121 mL, respectively. An introduction of the stapler into the lower esophagus and a closure of the common entry hole were performed safely without any stress.

CONCLUSION

Although several techniques must be compared to determine the ideal procedure for laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy, the modified side-to-side anastomosis technique may be useful in clinical settings.

Internal hernia after laparoscopic gastric resection with antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

To decrease the incidence of internal hernia after laparoscopic gastric bypass, current recommendations include closure of mesenteric defects. Laparoscopic gastric resection is used increasingly for the treatment of gastric cancer, but the incidence of internal hernia in the treated patients has not been studied.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for gastric cancer at one institution, including distal and total gastric resections with antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

RESULTS

An internal hernia occurred in 4 (7%) of 58 patients whose jejunojejunal mesenteric defect was not closed a mean of 326 days after surgery. All the patients underwent reoperation with reduction and repair of the hernia. In 115 subsequent cases, with closure of the mesenteric defect, internal hernias did not occur (0/115 cases; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current recommendations for patients undergoing bariatric surgery, closure of this potential hernia defect is mandatory after laparoscopic gastrectomy with a Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer.

The effects of laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy on surgical outcomes in the treatment of gastric cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy (LATG), we compared its early surgical outcomes with those of conventional open total gastrectomy (OTG) in patients who were diagnosed as having early gastric cancer preoperatively.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed early surgical outcomes in 190 consecutive patients who underwent total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer between January 2009 to April 2010. The patients were divided into those who underwent LATG and those who underwent OTG. Their early surgical outcomes were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of LATG.

Results

There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rates (P = 0.291). But in the analysis of other early surgical outcomes, we found that LATG could improve time to first flatus (P < 0.001), time to commencement of soft diet (P = 0.034), administration of analgesics (P = 0.024), pain score (Numeric Rating Scale), and hospital discharge (P = 0.045).

Conclusion

Although LATG didn't show better results for postoperative complications than those of OTG, LATG contributes to the improvement of early surgical outcomes, including bowel movement, pain score and hospital discharge. Therefore, we suggest that LATG could be a method to improve early surgical outcomes in patients who need total gastrectomy.

Application of the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) is not a commonly performed procedure due to the surgical difficulty associated with reconstruction. Although various reconstruction methods have been reported, a standard technique has not yet been established. In this study, we compared the short-term outcomes of LATG reconstructed by mini-laparotomy and by the newly developed transorally inserted anvil (OrVil).

METHODS

From April 2006, a series of 45 patients underwent LATG. Of these, 15 were reconstructed by mini-laparotomy and 30 by OrVil. Short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Operation time was significantly shortened and intraoperative blood loss significantly reduced by the use of OrVil. The postoperative course, including morbidity, did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LATG using OrVil for the treatment of early gastric cancer is a technically feasible surgical procedure with sufficient lymph node dissection, satisfactory early recovery, and acceptable morbidity. It will be necessary to perform this novel technique in a large number of patients to confirm its feasibility.