Clinicopathological features of severe and fulminant forms of autoimmune hepatitis

Severe and fulminant hepatitis of indeterminate etiology in a Japanese center

AIM

The outcome of acute liver failure (ALF) is influenced by its etiology, making etiological consideration of ALF important. However, specific etiology could not be identified in 30-40% of adult patients in a Japanese nationwide survey. We examined our patients with severe (SH) and fulminant hepatitis (FH) of indeterminate etiology for the better understanding of ALF.

METHODS

We investigated 106 adult patients with SH or FH including 24 of indeterminate etiology between 2000 and 2013, retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of 24 patients, 12 were men. Seventeen were SH and seven FH (three FH acute type and four FH subacute type). Eighty-three percent of patients were positive for antinuclear antibody. Seventeen recovered without liver transplantation (LT), two received LT and five died without LT. Histology of 15 patients showed a pattern of acute hepatitis (massive necrosis in four, submassive necrosis in one, severe acute hepatitis in two and acute hepatitis in eight). The involvement of immune-mediated liver injury was histologically suggested in some patients.

CONCLUSION

There was no large cluster of etiology in our patients with indeterminate cause. The causes of ALF of indeterminate etiology were the mixture of various minor or rare ones, if precise diagnosis of acute AIH was done. Outcome of our patients with indeterminate cause was not poor if they were treated as early as possible after the diagnosis of severe disease. Careful examination of unknown viral infection, drugs, toxins, undefined metabolic disorders and histology may help detect some of these etiologies.

Fulminant presentation of autoimmune hepatitis: clinical features and early predictors of corticosteroid treatment failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Classical features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may be altered during the abrupt onset of the disease. Corticosteroid therapy can be life-saving, but its use in the fulminant presentation of AIH (F-AIH) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the clinical features of patients with F-AIH and to describe the role of corticosteroids in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 154 adult patients with fulminant hepatic failure who were admitted to six liver transplantation (LT) programs. The AIH simplified criteria were used to identify patients with F-AIH.

RESULTS

We identified 40 (26%) patients with F-AIH. Compared with other etiologies, patients with F-AIH presented a longer interval from jaundice to encephalopathy (26 vs. 16 days, P=0.02) and a lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score on admission (29 vs. 33, P=0.002). Overall, 25 (62%) patients with F-AIH underwent LT, eight (20%) patients survived, and seven (18%) died without LT. Seventeen patients received corticosteroids therapy, of whom seven (41%) survived without LT. Among the treated patients, higher MELD score and encephalopathy grade of 3 or more were associated significantly with corticosteroid failure.

CONCLUSION

Patients with F-AIH have a more indolent presentation compared with the non-F-AIH population. Altogether, only eight (20%) patients presenting with F-AIH survived without LT. A subset of patients with F-AIH and an initial MELD score less than 27 and low-grade hepatic encephalopathy might benefit from administration of corticosteroids.

A common immunopathogenesis mechanism for infectious diseases: the protein-homeostasis-system hypothesis

It was once believed that host cell injury in various infectious diseases is caused solely by pathogens themselves; however, it is now known that host immune reactions to the substances from the infectious agents and/or from the injured host cells by infectious insults are also involved. All biological phenomena in living organisms, including biochemical, physiological and pathological processes, are performed by the proteins that have various sizes and shapes, which in turn are controlled by an interacting network within the living organisms. The author proposes that this network is controlled by the protein homeostasis system (PHS), and that the immune system is one part of the PHS of the host. Each immune cell in the host may recognize and respond to substances, including pathogenic proteins (PPs) that are toxic to target cells of the host, in ways that depend on the size and property of the PPs. Every infectious disease has its own set of toxic substances, including PPs, associated with disease onset, and the PPs and the corresponding immune cells may be responsible for the inflammatory processes that develop in those infectious diseases.

Autoimmune hepatitis, one disease with many faces: Etiopathogenetic, clinico-laboratory and histological characteristics

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an unresolving progressive liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, autoantibodies detection and interface hepatitis. Due to the absence of specific diagnostic markers and the large heterogeneity of its clinical, laboratory and histological features, AIH diagnosis may be potentially difficult. Therefore, in this in-depth review we summarize the substantial progress on etiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological phenotypes of AIH. AIH has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic to severe or rarely fulminant hepatitis. Hypergammaglobulinemia with selective elevation of IgG is found in most cases. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry, and favored by the impaired control of T-regulatory cells. Histology (interface hepatitis, emperipolesis and hepatic rosette formation) and autoantibodies detection although not pathognomonic, are still the hallmark for a timely diagnosis. AIH remains a major diagnostic challenge. AIH should be considered in every case in the absence of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic etiology of chronic or acute hepatitis. Laboratory personnel, hepato-pathologists and clinicians need to become more familiar with disease expressions and the interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology to derive maximum benefit for the patient.

Fixed point observation of etiology of acute liver failure according to the novel Japanese diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

There has existed important differences in the definition of acute liver failure (ALF) between Japanese criteria and those of other countries. The novel diagnostic criteria for ALF in Japanese patients were established by the Intractable Hepato-Biliary Diseases Study Group of Japan, in order to correspond to those for ALF in Europe and the USA. We prospectively diagnosed our ALF patients based on this novel criteria, and discussed the etiology by a fixed point observation.

METHODS

We investigated the etiology of 54 adult inpatients and outpatients with ALF between 2010 and 2012.

RESULTS

Of 54 patients, 36 were ALF without coma, 17 ALF with coma and one late onset hepatic failure. The etiology was due to viral infections in 38.9%, autoimmune hepatitis in 11.1%, drug-induced liver injury in 13.0%, etiologies without hepatitis in 29.6% (circulatory disturbance in 18.5%, infiltration of the liver by malignant cells in 7.4%, and metabolic diseases in 3.7%) and indeterminate causes in 7.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulatory disturbance was the most frequent etiology according to the novel criteria. Indeterminate etiology was less observed in our study than the nation-wide survey with significance (P = 0.0014).

Clinical characteristics and corticosteroid therapy in patients with autoimmune-hepatitis-induced liver failure

AIM: To investigate the clinical features, response to corticosteroids, and prognosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH)-induced liver failure in China.

METHODS: A total of 22 patients (19 female and 3 male; average age 51 ± 15 years) with AIH-induced liver failure treated in our hospital from 2004 to 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical, biochemical and pathological characteristics of the 22 patients and responses to corticosteroid treatment in seven patients were examined retrospectively. The patients were divided into survivor and non-survivor groups, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis were compared between the two groups. The t test was used for data analysis of all categorical variables, and overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis, mean IgG was 2473 ± 983 mg/dL, with three (18.8%) patients showing normal levels. All of the patients had elevated serum levels of antinuclear antibody (≥ 1:640). Liver histology from one patient showed diagnostic pathological changes, including massive necrosis and plasma cell infiltration. Four patients survived (18.2%) and 18 died (81.8%) without liver transplantation. The results showed that patients with low admission Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (21.50 ± 2.08 vs 30.61 ± 6.70, P < 0.05) and corticosteroid therapy (100% vs 16.7%, P < 0.05) had better prognosis. A total of seven patients received corticosteroid therapy, of whom, four responded and survived, and the other three died. Survivors showed young age, shorter duration from diagnosis to corticosteroid therapy, low MELD score, and absence of hepatic encephalopathy at the time of corticosteroid administration. Six patients who were administered corticosteroids acquired fungal infections but recovered after antifungal therapy.

CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and corticosteroid therapy are essential for improving the prognosis of patients with AIH-induced liver failure without liver transplantation.

Challenges in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis has diverse clinical phenotypes and outcomes that challenge current diagnostic criteria and management algorithms.

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the major difficulties in diagnosis and management, describe the efforts to ease them and encourage further progress in problem solving.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was reviewed for published experiences from 1984 to 2013.

RESULTS

Acute or acute severe (fulminant) hepatitis, asymptomatic mild disease, and histological findings of centrilobular necrosis or bile duct injury can confound diagnosis and treatment. Continuation of conventional therapy until normal liver test results and liver tissue reduces the frequency of relapse, but does not prevent its occurrence. Problematic patients can be identified using mathematical models, clinical phenotype, serological markers and the speed of improvement after treatment; however, their recognition and treatment are inconsistent. Mycophenolate mofetil can rescue patients with azathioprine intolerance but is less effective for refractory disease. Budesonide in combination with azathioprine can be used frontline, but is effective primarily in noncirrhotic, uncomplicated disease. Molecular and cellular interventions are feasible but largely unevaluated.

DISCUSSION

Resolution of the current challenges requires revision of diagnostic criteria, characterization of biological markers that reflect pathogenic pathways, development of dynamic indexes based on changes in disease behaviour, and introduction of new pharmacological, molecular and cellular interventions that have undergone rigorous evaluation.

CONCLUSION

These challenges reflect important remediable deficiencies in current management.

A case of primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis overlap showing acute presentation and transient seropositivity for immunoglobulin G and anti-nuclear antibody

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is generally regarded as a clinically and histologically "chronic" hepatitis. It often shows acute presentation like acute hepatitis without typical clinicopathological features of AIH, especially in a case of overlap with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). A 52-year-old man showed mild liver dysfunction for the first time at an annual medical check. Two months later, he showed jaundice, and laboratory tests revealed elevation of liver enzymes, hyperbilirubinemia and prolonged prothrombin time activity like acute liver failure. Anti-mitochondrial antibody was positive and other viral and autoimmune markers were negative. His liver function tests improved upon treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and maximum intravenous glycyrrhizin (IVGL), but liver dysfunction was again exacerbated after the gradual reduction of IVGL. He showed transient elevation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) at only one point, and liver histology was compatible with PBC and AIH overlap syndrome. Corticosteroid was administered and his liver function tests returned to normal. It is important for the diagnosis of acute onset AIH to monitor IgG level and ANA titer, especially in patients without IgG and ANA elevations at first appearance.

Review article: autoimmune hepatitis -- current management and challenges

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown aetiology characterised by interface hepatitis, hypergammaglobulinaemia, circulating autoantibodies and a favourable response to immunosuppression.

AIM

To review recent advancements in understanding aetiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological features, diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies of AIH.

METHODS

Published studies on AIH extracted mainly from PubMed during the last 15 years.

RESULTS

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations are variable ranging from no symptoms to severe acute hepatitis and only seldom to fulminant hepatic failure. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry mechanisms, and favoured by the impaired control of regulatory T-cells. A typical laboratory finding is hypergammaglobulinaemia with selective elevation of IgG, although in 15-25% of patients - particularly children, elderly and acute cases - IgG levels are normal. Liver histology and autoantibodies, although not pathognomonic, still remain the hallmark for diagnosis. Immunosuppressive treatment is mandatory and life-saving; however, to meet strict response criteria, the conventional therapy with prednisolone with or without azathioprine is far from ideal.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune hepatitis remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The clinician, the hepato-pathologist and the laboratory personnel need to become more familiar with different expressions of the disease, interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology. According to the strict definition of treatment response issued by the 2010 AASLD guidelines, many patients are nonresponders to conventional treatment. Newer immunosuppressive agents targeting pathogenetic mechanisms can improve patient management, which needs to be tailored on a case-by-case basis.

Review article: the management of autoimmune hepatitis beyond consensus guidelines

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines aid in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis, but they are frequently based on low-quality clinical evidence, conflicting experiences and divergent opinions. Recommendations may be weak, discrepant or non-existent at critical decision points.

AIMS

To identify the decision points where guidelines are weak or non-existent and review the evidence essential in the decision process.

METHODS

Full-text articles published in English using the keyword 'autoimmune hepatitis' were identified by PubMed from 1972 to 2013. Personal experience and investigations in autoimmune hepatitis also identified important contributions.

RESULTS

Seventy per cent of the guidelines developed by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and 48% of those proposed by the British Society of Gastroenterology are based on low-quality evidence, conflicting experiences or divergent opinions. The key uncertainties in diagnosis relate to the timing of liver biopsy, recognising acute severe (fulminant) disease, interpreting coincidental nonclassical histological changes, accommodating atypical or deficient features in non-White patients, differentiating drug-induced from classical disease and identifying overlap syndromes. The key uncertainties in management relate to pre-treatment testing for thiopurine methyltransferase activity, treating asymptomatic mild disease, determining treatment end points, managing suboptimal responses, incorporating nonstandard medications as front-line and salvage agents, using azathioprine in pregnancy and instituting surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus guidelines are fraught with uncertainties in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis. Each decision point must counterbalance the current available evidence and tailor the application of this evidence to the individual patient.

Autoimmune hepatitis in diverse ethnic populations and geographical regions

Autoimmune hepatitis has diverse clinical phenotypes and outcomes in ethnic groups within a country and between countries, and these differences may reflect genetic predispositions, indigenous etiological agents, pharmacogenomic mechanisms and socioeconomic reasons. In the USA, African-American patients have cirrhosis more commonly, treatment failure more frequently and higher mortality than white American patients. Survival is poorest in Asian-American patients. Autoimmune hepatitis in other countries is frequently associated with genetic predispositions that may favor susceptibility to indigenous etiological agents. Cholestatic features influence treatment response; acute-on-chronic liver disease increases mortality and socioeconomic and cultural factors affect prognosis. Ethnic-based deviations from classical phenotypes and the frequency of late-stage disease can complicate the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis in non-white populations.

Acute and acute severe (fulminant) autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis frequently has an abrupt onset of symptoms, and it can present with acute liver failure. The abrupt presentation can indicate spontaneous exacerbation of a pre-existent chronic disease, newly created disease, a superimposed infectious or toxic injury, or new disease after viral infection, drug therapy, or liver transplantation. Deficiencies in the classical phenotype may include a low serum immunoglobulin G level and low or absent titers of the conventional autoantibodies. The original revised diagnostic scoring system of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group can guide the diagnostic evaluation, but low scores do not preclude the diagnosis. Liver tissue examination is valuable to exclude viral-related or drug-induced liver injury and support the diagnosis by demonstrating centrilobular necrosis (usually with interface hepatitis), lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, hepatocyte rosettes, and fibrosis. Conventional therapy with prednisone and azathioprine induces clinical and laboratory improvement in 68-75 % of patients with acute presentations, and high dose prednisone or prednisolone (preferred drug) is effective in 20-100 % of patients with acute severe (fulminant) presentations. Failure to improve or worsening of any clinical or laboratory feature within 2 weeks of treatment or worsening of a mathematical model of end-stage liver disease within 7 days justifies liver transplantation in acute liver failure. Liver transplantation for acute severe (fulminant) autoimmune hepatitis is as successful as liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis with a chronic presentation and other types of acute liver failure (patient survival >1 year, 80-94 %). Liver transplantation should not be delayed or superseded by protracted corticosteroid therapy or the empiric institution of nonstandard medications.

Etiology and prognosis of fulminant hepatitis and late-onset hepatic failure in Japan: Summary of the annual nationwide survey between 2004 and 2009

AIM

To summarize the annual nationwide survey on fulminant hepatitis (FH) and late-onset hepatic failure (LOHF) between 2004 and 2009 in Japan.

METHODS

The annual survey was performed in a two-step questionnaire process to detail the clinical profile and prognosis of patients in special hospitals.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty (n = 227 acute type; n = 233 subacute type) patients had FH and 28 patients had LOHF. The mean age of patients with FH and LOHF were 51.1 ± 17.0 and 58.0 ± 14.4 years, respectively. The causes of FH were hepatitis A virus in 3.0%, hepatitis B virus (HBV) in 40.2%, other viruses in 2.0%, autoimmune hepatitis in 8.3%, drug allergy-induced in 14.6% and indeterminate etiology in 29.6% of patients. HBV reactivation due to immunosuppressive therapy was observed in 6.8% of FH patients. The short-term survival rates of patients without liver transplantation (LT) were 48.7% and 24.2% for the acute and subacute type, respectively, and 13.0% for LOHF. The prognosis was poor in patients with HBV reactivation. The implementation rate for LT in FH patients was equivalent to that in the previous survey. The short-term survival rates of total patients, including LT patients, were 54.2% and 40.8% for the acute and subacute type, respectively, and 28.6% for LOHF.

CONCLUSION

The demographic features and etiology of FH patients has gradually changed. HBV reactivation due to immunosuppressive therapy is problematic. Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, the prognosis of patients without LT has not improved.

Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive necroinflammatory liver disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mainly affecting females, AIH has a varied clinical presentation from minor symptomatology to acute liver failure. The diagnosis should be considered in anyone with abnormal liver function tests. Diagnostic features include biochemical evidence of transaminitis, elevated IgG and positive autoantibodies. Liver biopsy may show interface hepatitis with portal-based plasma cell infiltrates. A clinical and pathological spectrum of disease exists with other autoimmune liver disease in rare cases. AIH responds promptly to immunosuppression therapy, including corticosteroids (prednis(ol)one or budesonide) with azathioprine. Treatment failure can be addressed with several second-line immunosuppressive agents. Liver transplantation remains a successful salvage therapy for acute autoimmune liver failure or treatment failure in chronic AIH complicated by synthetic dysfunction, portal hypertension or hepatocellular carcinoma.

Comment on the British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for management of autoimmune hepatitis (part 1)

The British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for management of autoimmune hepatitis were recently published in Gut. The chapters concerning epidemiology, presentation and diagnosis are addressed here.

Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic liver disease characterized by elevated aminotransferase levels, autoantibodies, increased γ-globulin or IgG levels and biopsy evidence of interface hepatitis. Recent advances include new practice guidelines that redefine criteria for remission to require complete biochemical and histological normalization on therapy; comparisons between the revised original and simplified diagnostic scoring systems; refined characterization of autoantibodies and their diagnostic performance parameters; proof of the safety and efficacy of combination budesonide and azathioprine therapy for non-cirrhotic patients; scrutiny of overlap syndromes; further analyses of the outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation and the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after transplantation. Anticipated consequences of the application of the new definition of therapeutic remission include a reduction in the proportion of patients achieving remission with conventional immunosuppression regimens and a corresponding increase in the need for alternative therapies.

Current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis in Japan

While a certain international consensus has been reached regarding the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), there are some unique clinical characteristics of AIH in Japan. For diagnosis of AIH using the new simplified criteria proposed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group, it is necessary to re-evaluate the antibody titer determined by using HEp-2 cells, which are widely used in Japan, and the finding of emperipolesis in liver histology, although the criteria are useful for rapid identification of AIH in routine clinical practice. The use of azathioprine as first-line therapy for AIH is limited in Japan because the drug is not covered by the Japanese national health insurance. Concomitant use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) to reduce corticosteroids and use of UDCA as monotherapy are therefore considered promising. Moreover, a relatively good survival rate has been reported in patients who developed AIH-induced acute liver failure and underwent living-donor liver transplantation. Current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of AIH in Japan are described in this report with a review of recent findings.

Importance of computed tomography imaging features for the diagnosis of autoimmune acute liver failure

AIM

  The diagnosis of acute liver failure due to autoimmune hepatitis is often difficult because of atypical clinicopathological features. Patients with autoimmune acute liver failure are sometimes resistant to immunosuppressive therapy and have poor prognosis. Although their survival rates are especially poor (5-20%) without liver transplantation in Japan, their clinicopathological features have remained uncertain. A major problem is that there is no gold standard for making the diagnosis of acute onset autoimmune hepatitis. If there are diagnosing tools supporting clinicopathological features, they are of benefit to the patients. We examined computed tomography (CT) imaging features of autoimmune acute liver failure to clarify the usefulness of imaging for the diagnosis.

METHODS

  A retrospective analysis of 129 unenhanced CT scans of 68 patients with acute hepatitis, consisting of 23 with autoimmune acute liver failure (ALF) (group 1), 25 with early admission-viral ALF (group 2) and 20 with late admission-viral ALF (group 3), was performed.

RESULTS

  Autoimmune acute liver failure showed heterogeneous hypoattenuating areas and viral ALF diffuse ones (P < 0.001). The diffuse hypoattenuating areas were present in none of group 1, 15 (60%) of group 2, and 7 (30%) of group 3. The heterogeneous hypoattenuating areas were present in 15 (65%) of group 1, none of group 2 and 1 (5%) of group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

  Heterogeneous hypoattenuation on unenhanced CT was a characteristic CT imaging feature of autoimmune acute liver failure compared with viral ALF. This finding could be one of the tools for diagnosing autoimmune acute liver failure in combination with clinicopathological features.

Efficacy of intravenous glycyrrhizin in the early stage of acute onset autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute onset autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) shows acute presentation like acute hepatitis and does not have typical clinicopathological features of AIH. There is no gold standard for making the diagnosis. Therefore, losing the timing of starting immunosuppressive therapy, some of the cases develop into severe or fulminant form and have poor prognosis.

AIMS

Our aim was to elucidate the efficacy of intravenous glycyrrhizin in decreasing alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level in the early stage of acute onset AIH.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were defined as acute onset AIH based on our uniform criteria, and were enrolled in this study. We prospectively treated 17 patients with sufficient doses (100 ml/day) of intravenous glycyrrhizin (SNMC) at an early stage (SNMC group), and treated 14 patients of severe disease with intravenous glycyrrhizin and corticosteroids (CS) (SNMC + CS group). We examined their clinical and biochemical features and treatment responses.

RESULTS

The ALT level could be controlled at an early stage using SNMC with no significant difference compared with SNMC + CS, and responsiveness to the therapy was determined by the disease severity at the time of starting therapy rather than the time duration from onset to therapy. Recovery rate was higher in the SNMC group than in the SNMC + CS group (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The early introduction of sufficient doses of SNMC might prevent disease progression in patients with acute onset AIH. SNMC can be used safely and be useful for patients with difficult-to-diagnose acute liver disease as an 'initial' treatment tool to improve liver inflammation before starting disease-specific treatments.

Diagnostic value and utility of the simplified International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group criteria in acute-onset autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is already difficult, and that of acute-onset AIH with atypical features is even more challenging, even though the revised original diagnostic criteria created by an international AIH group were widely accepted and incorporated into clinical practice.

AIMS

Recently, simplified diagnostic criteria were proposed. We compared the performance parameters of the simplified scoring system in patients with acute-onset AIH and examined its usefulness and limitations.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with acute-onset AIH (29 non-severe, 14 severe and 12 fulminant) were assessed according to the simplified scoring system and compared with the revised original one.

RESULTS

Of the 55 patients, 22 (40%) were diagnosed as 'definite' AIH, 28 (51%) as 'probable' and five (9%) as 'non-diagnostic' based on the revised original scoring system. By the simplified scoring system, six (11%) were diagnosed as 'definite' AIH, 16 (29%) as 'probable' and 33 (60%) as 'non-diagnostic'. Anti-nuclear antibody titres did not differ among the three groups. The immunoglobulin G level was higher in fulminant than in non-severe patients (P = 0.01). Sixty-five per cent showed acute hepatitis (massive necrosis, submassive necrosis and severe acute hepatitis) and 35% showed chronic hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised original scoring system performed better in patients with acute-onset AIH than the simplified scoring system.

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis: Does it exist? A published work review

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), initially called chronic aggressive hepatitis, is conceptually classified as a primary chronic disease; periportal fibrous expansion and periportal infiltration of mononuclear cells, including plasma cells, have also been considered to be histologically important diagnostic signs of AIH. However, several manuscripts which reported the acute presentation of AIH have been published recently and the reported cases of acute presentation in these manuscripts contained two different clinical entities. One is acute exacerbation of chronic AIH (acute exacerbation form) and the other is genuine acute AIH without chronic histological changes (acute form). It is clinically important to distinguish the acute form from the acute exacerbation form. The reports of the acute form revealed that the existence of centrilobular necrosis without chronic changes was the most important histological finding related to the acute form. Because the elevation of serum levels of immunoglobulin G and antinuclear antibody are not observed in some acute presentation AIH patients, the physician may not consider AIH when they encounter such patients. Therefore, it is very important to bear in mind a possibility of acute presentation AIH when the physician encounters patients with hepatic dysfunction of unknown cause because it became clear that delay of the diagnosis and start of therapy lead to the poor prognosis of AIH. In this review, we outline the current state of acute presentation of AIH including the genuine acute form based on the published clinical studies and case reports.

Autoimmune fulminant liver failure in adults: Experience in a Japanese center

AIM

  After the establishment of the international criteria of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in 1999 and the recognition of acute onset AIH, the diagnosis of patients with fulminant type of AIH came to be made. We diagnosed autoimmune fulminant liver failure based on the criteria, and discussed the etiology of fulminant hepatitis (FH) and late onset hepatic failure (LOHF), and the characteristics of autoimmune fulminant liver failure.

METHODS

  We investigated the etiology of 95 consecutive adult patients with FH or LOHF admitted to our liver unit between 1990 and 2009. Clinical and biochemical features, therapies and outcomes were examined in patients with AIH after 2000.

RESULTS

  Of 95 patients, 85 were FH and 10 LOHF. The etiology was due to viral infections in 51.6% (hepatitis A virus in 7.4%, hepatitis B virus in 43.2% and hepatitis E virus in 1.1%), AIH in 15.8%, drug allergy-induced in 12.6%, and unknown causes in 20.0%. The rate of patients with AIH increased significantly between 2000 and 2009 compared to the rate between 1990 and 1999 (P = 0.002). In recovered patients with AIH without transplantation after 2000, coma grade was lower, alanine aminotransferase level, prothrombin time activity and alfa-fetoprotein level were higher than in the others with statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

  AIH is not a rare cause of FH and LOHF, and the number of patients with unknown causes would surely decrease in concert with the precise diagnosis of AIH.