Segmental vs. extended colectomy: measurable differences in morbidity, function, and quality of life

Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasm after a Segmental Colectomy in Lynch Syndrome Patients According to Mismatch Repair Gene Status

BACKGROUND

Because of increased risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC), all patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) are offered a total colectomy. However, because metachronous CRC rate by mismatch repair (MMR) gene is uncertain, and total colectomy negatively impacts quality of life, it remains unclear whether segmental resection is indicated for lower penetrance MMR genes. We evaluated metachronous CRC incidence according to MMR gene in LS patients who underwent a segmental colectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective cohort study in patients with an earlier colectomy for CRC and an MMR germline mutation in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 followed prospectively in a hereditary CRC family registry. All patients underwent surveillance colonoscopy. Metachronous CRC was defined as one detected more than 1 year after index resection. Primary end point was cumulative incidence of metachronous CRC overall and by MMR gene.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients were included: 35 with MLH1 likely pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) variants (32%), 42 MSH2 (38%), 20 MSH6 (18%), and 13 PMS2 (12%). Median follow-up 4.26 years (range 0.53 to 19.92 years). Overall, metachronous CRC developed in 22 patients (20%). At 10-year follow-up, incidence was 12% (95% CI 6% to 23%), with no metachronous CRC detected in patients with a PMS2 or MSH6 LP/P variant.

CONCLUSIONS

After index segmental resection, metachronous CRC is less likely to develop in LS patients with MSH6 or PMS2 LP/P variant than in MLH1 or MSH2 carriers. Our data support segmental resection and long-term colonoscopic surveillance rather than total colectomy in carefully selected, well-informed LS patients with MSH6 or PMS2 LP/P variant.

Elective surgery for tumours of the splenic flexure: a French inter-group (AFC, SFCD, FRENCH, GRECCAR) survey

BACKGROUND

In an elective setting, there is no consensus regarding the type of colectomy that is best for patients with tumors of the splenic flexure: segmental left colectomy (or splenic flexure colectomy), left hemicolectomy or subtotal colectomy (or extended right hemicolectomy). In the United Kingdom, extended right hemicolectomy is preferred by surgeons. The aim of the present survey was to report on the practices in France for this particular tumor location.

METHODS

Between 15/07/17 and 15/10/17, members of two French surgical societies [the French Association of Surgery (AFC) and the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD)] and two French surgical cooperative groups [the French Federation of Surgical Research (FRENCH) and the French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (GRECCAR)] were solicited by email to answer an online anonymous questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 190 out of 420 surgeons participated in this study (response rate 45%). The preferred procedure was splenic flexure colectomy (70%), followed by left hemicolectomy (17%) and subtotal colectomy (13%). The most used surgical approach was laparoscopy (63%), followed by laparotomy (31%) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (6%). Lymph node dissection was extended to the middle colic artery in 29% of splenic flexure colectomies and in 33% of left hemicolectomies. Twenty-nine percent of responders thought that tumors of the splenic flexure had a worse prognosis in comparison with other colonic sites, because of insufficient lymph node dissection (73%) or a more advanced stage (50%) at diagnosis. However, this opinion did not change the type of colectomy performed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong consensus in France to operate tumors of the splenic flexure with a splenic flexure colectomy and lymph node dissection limited to the left colic artery.

Laparoscopic segmental left colectomy for splenic flexure carcinoma: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing debate regarding surgical treatment of splenic flexure cancer. The main points of controversy include the appropriate extent of colon resection, either to the right or to the left, and the appropriate extent of lymph-node dissection. The aim of this study was to review our experience in laparoscopic treatment of splenic flexure cancer cases and to compare our data to the recent literature.

METHODS

Consecutive patients, operated on for splenic flexure colon carcinoma at a single institution between April 2005 and January 2013, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were a previous history of colorectal cancer, recurrent colonic cancer, emergency cases with an obstructive tumor or a perforated tumor with peritonitis, synchronous cancer, palliative surgery, and a past history of colorectal resection. Patients underwent laparoscopic segmental left colectomy with ligation of the left branch of the middle colic and of the left colic artery. Patient characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes, and long-term technical, functional, and oncological results from a prospectively maintained database were retrospectively analyzed. After hospital discharge, standardized follow-up was performed at 1 month postoperatively, then every 3 months during the first 2 years, and every 6 months thereafter, for a total of 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 28 consecutive patients (16 males) with a median age of 71.8 years (range 42.5-88.8 years) were included. Ninety-day mortality was 3.5% and surgical morbidity was 21.5% with anastomotic leak rate of 10.7%. All survivors experienced good or very good functional results. During a median follow-up period of 50.9 months, eight patients (28.5%) presented with a recurrence. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 46.3% and 39.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental left colectomy for splenic flexure carcinoma is associated with reasonably low morbidity and very good functional results. However, survival rates are low.

Age-specific health-related quality of life in long-term and very long-term colorectal cancer survivors versus population controls - a population-based study. Acta Oncol 2019;58:801-810. [PMID: 30736716 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1557340]

Background: Previous research suggests an age differential in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among long-term (5-10 years post-diagnosis, LTS) colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Few studies have specifically addressed the association of age differentials with HRQOL for very long-term CRC survivors (>10 years post-diagnosis, VLTS) and non-cancer population controls. We aimed to assess possible deficits in HRQOL of disease-free CRC-LTS and CRC-VLTS in comparison with non-cancer population controls, and whether the observed pattern varies by age and time since diagnosis. Methods: We used data from the CAncEr Survivorship - A multi-Regional (CAESAR+) study in collaboration with five population-based German cancer registries. HRQOL from controls was accessed from the Lebensqualität in DEeutschland (LinDE) study. All respondents completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core-30 questionnaire. We calculated least square means of HRQOL scores. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and education, where appropriate. Results: The sample included 862 CRC-LTS, 400 CRC-VLTS and 1689 controls. CRC survivors reported overall good HRQOL but significantly poorer social functioning and more problems with dyspnea, constipation, diarrhea and finances than controls. When stratified by age, deficits in functioning and global health, and more problems with symptoms and finances were noted mainly among younger CRC survivors. Further stratification by time since diagnosis showed that similar deficits in HRQOL and symptoms were noted mainly among the younger CRC-LTS group when compared with controls. Generally, CRC-VLTS reported comparable HRQOL to controls. An exception was noted for diarrhea, whereby CRC survivors, regardless of age and time since diagnosis, reported significantly more problems with this symptom than controls. Conclusions: In comparison with non-cancer controls, disease-free CRC survivors reported overall good HRQOL but experience persistent specific detriments in HRQOL many years after diagnosis. In age stratified analyses, HRQOL deficits were noted mainly among younger CRC-LTS.

Is Segmental Colon Resection an Alternative Treatment for Splenic Flexure Cancer?

Background: Optimal elective surgery for splenic flexure cancer is unclear. Three types of surgical treatment methods are commonly used, subtotal colectomy (STC), left hemicolectomy (LHC), and segmental colon resection (SCR), but consensus is lacking as to which is the optimal method. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively compared clinicopathological and operative results, morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival in patients with splenic flexure cancer who underwent surgery between 1998 and 2018. Results: The study included 124 patients in the study. Following retrospective evaluation of the database, patients were classified into one of three groups according to the surgical approach: (1) STC (n: 41), (2) LHC (n: 55), and (3) SCR (n: 28). No statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding operative results, hospital stay, pathological data, mortality, recurrence, or long-term survival outcomes. Conclusion: Our results suggest that surgical procedures such as STC and LHC have no statistically significant clinical benefits over less aggressive approaches such as SCR. We thus conclude that SCR seems both a safe and effective alternative for splenic flexure tumors.

Metachronous colorectal cancer following segmental or extended colectomy in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Around 5% of colorectal cancers are due to mutations within DNA mismatch repair genes, resulting in Lynch syndrome (LS). These mutations have a high penetrance with early onset of colorectal cancer at a mean age of 45 years. The mainstay of surgical management is either a segmental or extensive colectomy. Currently there is no unified agreement as to which management strategy is superior due to limited conclusive empirical evidence available. A systematic review and meta- analysis to evaluate the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (MCC) and mortality in LS following segmental and extensive colectomy. A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted. Studies were included/ excluded based on pre-specified criteria. To assess the risk of MCC and mortality attributed to segmental or extensive colectomies, relative risks (RR) were calculated and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Publication bias was investigated using funnel plots. Data about mortality, as well as patient ascertainment [Amsterdam criteria (AC), germline mutation (GM)] were also extracted. Statistical analysis was conducted using the R program (version 3.2.3). The literature search identified 85 studies. After further analysis ten studies were eligible for inclusion in data synthesis. Pooled data identified 1389 patients followed up for a mean of 100.7 months with a mean age of onset of 45.5 years of age. A total 1119 patients underwent segmental colectomies with an absolute risk of MCC in this group of 22.4% at the end of follow-up. The 270 patients who had extensive colectomies had a MCC absolute risk of 4.7% (0% in those with a panproctocolecomy). Segmental colectomy was significantly associated with an increased relative risk of MCC (RR = 5.12; 95% CI 2.88-9.11; Fig. 1), although no significant association with mortality was identified (RR = 1.65; 95% CI 0.90-3.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of MCC between AC and GM cohorts (p = 0.5, Chi-squared test). In LS, segmental colectomy results in a significant increased risk of developing MCC. Despite the choice of segmental or extensive colectomies having no statistically significant impact on mortality, the choice of initial surgical management can impact a patient's requirement for further surgery. An extensive colectomy can result in decreased need for further surgery; reduced hospital stays and associated costs. The significant difference in the risk of MCC, following segmental or extensive colectomies should be discussed with patients when deciding appropriate management. An individualised approach should be utilised, taking into account the patient's age, co-morbidities and genotype. In order to determine likely germline-specific effects, or a difference in survival, larger and more comprehensive studies are required.

Feasibility and Safety of Intraoperative Colonoscopy after Segmental Colectomy and Primary Anastomosis

Patients presenting with near-obstructing colon lesions requiring segmental colectomy may benefit from intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) after primary anastomosis for a more timely and accurate diagnosis of synchronous lesions. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of this technique. A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing single-stage segmental colectomy and anastomosis at a single tertiary care institution from 2011 to 2013 was performed. One Hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients underwent segmental colectomy and primary anastomosis of which 78 (46%) were unable to receive preoperative colonoscopy (POC) because of near-obstructing lesions and received IOC after the anastomosis. IOC detected synchronous adenomatous polyps in 24.4 per cent, diverticular disease in 19 per cent, and colitis/proctitis in 2.5 per cent. The IOC group was not significantly different from the POC group with regard to overall morbidity (31% vs 39% P = 0.45), anastomotic leakage (1.3% vs 0%, P = 0.46), or wound infection (5.1% vs 1.1%, P = 0.18). Operation time was 19 minutes longer in the intra-operative group, but overall length of hospital stay was not significantly different (6.4 ± 2.9 days vs 7.3 ± 4.6 days). In patients unable to receive POC because of partial obstruction, IOC after primary anastomosis is both feasible and safe for detecting proximal synchronous lesions.

Efficacy, functional outcome and post-operative complications of total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis vs. segmental colectomy in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

The primary objective of the present study was to compare the choice of colectomy, i.e. total vs. segmental colectomy, in cases of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC/lynch syndrome), and to assess the efficacy, oncological safety, functional outcome and post-operative complications of total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis vs. segmental colectomy in HNPCC. A total of 289 patients who fulfilled the Amsterdam I and II criteria for HNPCC were included in the present study. The criteria for confirmation of the diagnosis were five micro-satellite markers, namely BAT25, BAT26, D2s123, d5S346 and D17S250. Group 1 included those patients who received their diagnosis in the years 2011–2013 and those in group 2 had been diagnosed in the years 2014–2016. The cohort had been subjected to two different types of surgery: i) Standard and extended surgery including total colectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and subtotal colectomy and ii) segmental resection of the colon. Analysis of patient data indicated that in group 1, the extended resection was performed more frequently than in group 2 (68 vs. 34% of cases) and accordingly, segmental resection was less frequent (32 vs. 66%; P<0.001). In conclusion, the extensive rather than the segmental resection has been commonly performed several years ago, but at present, the surgical method of choice in cases of lynch syndrome is segmental resection. Trial registry no. QU/MR2011/CRC5, dated 21 March 2011.

Chronic diarrhoea following surgery for colon cancer-frequency, causes and treatment options

PURPOSE

The growing population of survivors after colon cancer warrants increased attention to the long-term outcome of surgical treatment. The change in bowel anatomy after resection disrupts normal gastrointestinal function and may cause symptoms. Thus, many patients surviving colon cancer have to cope with bowel dysfunction for the rest of their lives. We here aim to provide an overview of the literature on this topic.

METHODS

We review long-term functional outcomes of surgical treatment for colon cancer, the underlying pathology, and treatment options.

RESULTS

Common symptoms include constipation, urge for defecation and diarrhoea. Causes of diarrhoea after colon cancer surgery are sparsely studied, but they probably include bile acid malabsorption, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and disruption of the ileal brake. Specific diagnosis should be made to allow individual treatment based on the underlying pathology. Studies on treatment of functional problems after surgery for colon cancer are extremely few, but some lessons can be drawn from the treatment of other patient groups having undergone colon surgery.

CONCLUSION

Diarrhoea is likely a common long-term complication after colon cancer surgery. Attention to this complication and a specific diagnosis will aid the targeted treatment of patients suffering from this complication.

Lymphatic Drainage of the Splenic Flexure Defined by Intraoperative Scintigraphic Mapping

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical management of splenic flexure cancer is debated, partly because of an incomplete understanding of the lymphatic drainage of this region.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the normal lymphatic drainage of the human splenic flexure using laparoscopic scintigraphic mapping.

DESIGN

This was a clinical trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Thirty consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resections without splenic flexure pathology were recruited.

INTERVENTION

Technetium-99m was injected subserosally at the splenic flexure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lymphatic scintigraphic mapping was undertaken at 15, 30, and 60 minutes using a laparoscopic gamma probe at the left branch of the middle colic, left colic, inferior mesenteric, and ileocolic (control) lymphovascular pedicles.

RESULTS

Lymphatic drainage at 60 minutes was strongly dominant in the direction of the left colic pedicle (96% of patients), with a median gamma count of 284 (interquartile range, 113-413), versus the left branch of the middle colic count of 31 (interquartile range, 15-49; p < 0.0001). This equated to a median 9.2-times greater flow to the left colic versus the middle colic. Counts at the left colic were greater than all of the other mapped sites at 15, 30, and 60 minutes (p < 0.001), whereas middle colic and inferior mesenteric artery counts were equivalent. The protocol increased operative duration by 20 to 30 minutes without complications.

LIMITATIONS

These results report lymphatic drainage from patients with normal splenic flexures, and caution is necessary when extrapolating to patients with splenic flexure cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

The lymphatic drainage of the normal splenic flexure is preferentially directed toward the left colic in the high majority of cases. Retrieving these nodes should be prioritized in splenic flexure cancer resections, with important secondary emphasis on left middle colic nodes, supporting segmental (left hemicolectomy) resection as the procedure of choice. Additional development of colonic sentinel node mapping using these techniques may contribute to individualized surgical therapy morbidity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A495.

A surgical solution to regain bowel continuity following an extended left colectomy-reviving and extending the indication for a "Flip-Flop" procedure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Extended left hemicolectomy might be necessary for several indications. Once the resection is completed, it would be difficult or impossible to anastomose the transverse colon to the rectum due to the difficulty in mobilizing the transverse colon to reach for a tension-free rectal anastomosis. The aim of this report is to present the "Flip-Flop" technique to overcome this challenging situation. The procedure is based on a surgical technique published in the early 1960s to avoid permanent stoma after proctectomy and consists of changing the location of the right colon to reach the rectum.

METHODS

Clinical parameters, surgical aspects, and postoperative outcome of patients that underwent the flip-flop procedure following an extended left colectomy in our medical service was reviewed.

RESULTS

Three patients underwent a flip-flop procedure after an extended left colectomy performed for various reasons. The surgical technique is detailed in a step by step manner. Patients had uneventful postoperative recovery with an adequate functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that this approach should be revived and be considered also in cases when the full length of the rectum is preserved to avoid ileo-rectal anastomosis or a high-tension colocolonic anastomosis. Popularization of this surgical solution among surgeons is highly important.

Efficacy of proximal colectomy for surgical management of right-sided first colorectal cancer in Lynch Syndrome mutation carriers

BACKGROUND

This study analyzes the occurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) mutation carriers, interval until diagnosis of metachronous CRC, and survival after proximal colectomy (PC) compared with total (TC) and subtotal colectomy (STC) for right-sided first CRC in LS mutation carriers.

METHODS

Sixty-four LS mutation carriers with right-sided first CRC treated with PC or TC + STC were confirmed by clinical records. Bivariate analyses were examined for significance and life tables were generated for risk of metachronous CRC and survival estimates following surgery.

RESULTS

One of 16 (6.3%) mutation carriers treated with TC + STC developed subsequent CRC compared with 13/48 (27%) treated by PC. There was no significant difference in survival estimates between PC compared with TC + STC through 25 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Risk of subsequent CRC and survival estimates following PC and TC + STC should be considered in surgical management of right-sided first CRC in LS mutation carriers.

Colorectal surveillance after segmental resection for young-onset colorectal cancer: is there evidence for extended resection?

AIM

Although sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) usually occurs in patients aged over 50, recent evidence suggests that the incidence is increasing in younger patients. Such patients are theoretically at high risk of metachronous neoplasia and may be candidates for extended prophylactic colectomy. This study aimed to define the risk of metachronous cancer/adenomas during follow-up of younger patients who underwent segmental colectomy for CRC.

METHOD

A CRC database was used to identify patients aged under 50 who underwent surgery for CRC between 1994 and 2010. Patients diagnosed with hereditary cancer or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. The primary end-points were frequency of extended resection and the rates of metachronous cancer and high-risk adenomas during follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 284 young patients with a resectable primary tumour, of whom 280 (98.6%) underwent segmental resection, 3 (1%) extended resection and 1 (0.4%) local resection. Endoscopic follow-up was available for 150 of the patients who had segmental colectomy, with a mean age of 42.6 (±5.8) years at diagnosis and median follow-up time of 68 months (interquartile range 45-105). Out of these 150 patients, 4 (2.7%) developed metachronous colonic adenocarcinoma at 24, 71, 151 and 228 months after index surgery. Thirty additional patients had at least one adenoma identified during surveillance, and three had sessile serrated polyps. Out of the three patients undergoing extended resection, none had metachronous cancer or advanced adenomas at an average follow-up of 17 years.

CONCLUSION

A segmental colectomy or proctectomy is adequate treatment for patients presenting with CRC under the age of 50.

The Experience of Extended Bowel Resection in Individuals With a High Metachronous Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To ascertain individual experiences of extended bowel resection as treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) in those with a high metachronous CRC risk, including the self-reported adequacy of information received at different time points of treatment and recovery.
.

RESEARCH APPROACH

Qualitative.
.

SETTING

Participants were recruited through the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry and two hospitals in Melbourne, Australia.
.

PARTICIPANTS

18 individuals with a high metachronous CRC risk who had an extended bowel resection from 6-12 months ago.
.

METHODOLOGIC APPROACH

Semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed thematically.
.

FINDINGS

In most cases, the treating surgeon decided on the best option regarding surgical treatment. Participants felt well informed about the surgical procedure. Information related to surgical outcomes, recovery, and lifestyle adjustment from surgery was not always adequate. Many participants described ongoing worry about developing another cancer. 
.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing an extended resection to reduce metachronous CRC risk require detailed information delivered at more than one time point and relating to several different aspects of the surgical procedure and its outcomes.
.

INTERPRETATION

An increased emphasis should be given to the provision of patient information on surgical outcomes, recovery, and lifestyle adjustment. Colorectal nurses could provide support for some of the reported unmet needs.

Feasibility of Segmental Colectomy Followed by Endoscopic Surveillance as a Treatment Strategy for Colorectal Cancer Patients with Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Initial surgical procedures for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with Lynch syndrome remain controversial. This study assessed the validity of segmental colectomy (SGC) followed by endoscopic surveillance as a treatment strategy for CRC patients with Lynch syndrome.

METHODS

Among consecutive patients who underwent surgery for primary CRC between April 1985 and December 2014, 49 patients were observed to have germline mutations in a mismatch repair gene, and 38 patients who underwent SGC followed by periodic endoscopic surveillance at our institution were evaluated for metachronous CRC, need for secondary surgery, and the details of endoscopic surveillance.

RESULTS

Of the 38 patients who underwent SGC followed by periodic endoscopic surveillance at our institution, 6 (15.8%) patients showed metachronous CRC, 3 (7.9%) patients underwent endoscopic resection, and the other 3 patients (7.9%) underwent secondary surgery. The dispersion of the endoscopic surveillance interval was significantly greater in patients with metachronous CRC (364 ± 332.9 days) than in those without metachronous CRC (370 ± 129.7 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SGC followed by annual endoscopic surveillance was feasible as a treatment strategy for CRC patients with Lynch syndrome, because the incidence of metachronous CRC and the need for secondary surgery were low. Annual and periodic endoscopic surveillance might be essential for early detection of metachronous CRC and prevention of secondary surgery because of metachronous CRC in CRC patients with Lynch syndrome after SGC.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Colon Cancer

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons is dedicated to ensuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is composed of society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than to dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient.

A pilot study to assess near infrared laparoscopy with indocyanine green (ICG) for intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping in early colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous attempts at sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in colon cancer have been compromised by ineffective tracers and the inclusion of advanced disease. This study evaluated the feasibility of fluorescence detection of SLNs with indocyanine green (ICG) for lymphatic mapping in T1/T2 clinically staged colonic malignancy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with clinical T1/T2 stage colon cancer underwent endoscopic peritumoral submucosal injection of indocyanine green (ICG) for fluorescence detection of SLN using a near-infrared (NIR) camera. All patients underwent laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision surgery. Detection rate and sensitivity of the NIR-ICG technique were the study endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty patients mean age = 68 years [range = 38-80], mean BMI = 26.2 (IQR = 24.7-28.6) were studied. Mesocolic sentinel nodes (median = 3/patient) were detected by fluorescence within the standard resection field in 27/30 patients. Overall, ten patients had lymph node metastases, with one of these patients having a failed SLN procedure. Of the 27 patients with completed SLN mapping, nine patients had histologically positive lymph nodes containing malignancy. 3/9 had positive SLNs with 6 false negatives. In five of these false negative patients, tumours were larger than 35 mm with four also being T3/T4.

CONCLUSION

ICG mapping with NIR fluorescence allowed mesenteric detection of SLNs in clinical T1/T2 stage colonic cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: ID: NCT01662752.

Subtotal Colectomy for Colon Cancer Reduces the Need for Subsequent Surgery in Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The risk of metachronous colorectal cancer is high after surgical resection for first colon cancer in Lynch syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine whether extended surgery decreases the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer and improves long-term survival.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

SETTING

Data were collected from a nationwide registry.

PATIENTS

Two hundred forty-two Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant carriers who underwent surgery for a first colon cancer from 1984 to 2009 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent standard segmental colectomy (n = 144) or extended colectomy (n = 98) for colon cancer. Patients were followed a median of 14.6 up to 25 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk of subsequent colorectal cancer in either group, overall and disease-specific survival, and operative mortality were the primary outcomes measured.

RESULTS

Subtotal colectomy decreased the risk of subsequent colorectal cancer (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08-0.52; p = 0.001), compared with segmental resection. Subsequent colorectal cancer decreased in MLH1 carriers. The MSH2 carriers showed no statistical difference, possibly because of their small number. Disease-specific and overall survival within 25 years did not differ between the standard and extended surgeries (82.7% vs 87.2%, p = 0.76 and 47.2% vs 41.4%, p = 0.83). The cumulative risk of subsequent colorectal cancer was 20% in 10 years and 47% within 25 years after standard resection and 4% and 9% after extended surgery. The cumulative risk of metachronous colorectal cancer was 7% within 25 years after subtotal colectomy with ileosigmoidal anastomosis. One patient died of postoperative septicemia within 30 days after segmental colectomy.

LIMITATIONS

Data on surgical procedures were primarily collected retrospectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lynch syndrome pathogenic variant carriers may undergo subtotal colectomy to manage first colon cancer and avoid repetitive abdominal surgery and to reduce the remaining bowel to facilitate easier endoscopic surveillance. It provides no survival benefit, compared with segmental colon resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A319.

Subtotal colectomy versus left hemicolectomy for the elective treatment of splenic flexure colonic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Optimal elective surgical treatment for splenic flexure neoplasm (SFN) is unclear. Subtotal colectomy (STC) and left hemicolectomy (LHC) are the two more common strategies used.

METHODS

Observational multicentric study comparing postoperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival on patients with SFN electively operated by STC versus LHC between 2003 and 2014.

RESULTS

After revision of the databases, 144 patients were included (STC group, n = 68; LHC group, n = 76). No differences were found on epidemiological and surgical data. A higher global morbidity (58%vs37%, p = 0.014), surgical morbidity (50%vs33%, p = 0.037), postoperative ileus (37%vs20%, p = 0.023) and harvested lymph nodes (26vs18, p = 0.0001) were found on the STC group. No significant differences in complications according to severity, reoperation rate, hospital stay, mortality, recurrence or long-term survival were found between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher surgical morbidity was found on the STC group, mainly due to mild postoperative ileus. No differences on long-term oncological results were found.

Postoperative outcomes and functional results after Deloyer's procedure – a retrospective cohort study

Introduction The objective of our study was to describe surgical outcomes of Deloyers procedure in our referral center, and to compare the results of patients with and without protective ileostomy.

Methods Patients undergoing a Deloyers procedure from 2013 to 2016 were prospectively included. General characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative course, and functional outcomes were analyzed. Patients were compared into two groups: group (1) patients undergoing Deloyers procedure without ileostomy, and group (2) Deloyers procedure with protective ileostomy.

Results Sixteen patients undergoing isoperistaltic transposition of the right colon remnant were included, of which 9 (63%) were males with a median age of 47 (range 22–76) years. The main surgical indication was the restoration of bowel transit (62.5%). There was higher major morbidity rate in the Deloyers procedure with protective ileostomy group, but without statistical significance (20% vs. 9%, p = 0.92). No leaks or deaths were reported. The length of hospital stay was 7 days. The mean number of bowel movements per day was 4 at 18 months of follow up. Only four (25%) patients used irregularly loperamide.

Conclusions The Deloyers procedure has satisfactory results and is reproducible with low morbidity. The major and minor morbidity rates were similar between groups, suggesting that the costs and risks of a second procedure can be avoided by providing a safe primary anastomosis.

Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer following colectomy in Lynch syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for 2-4% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and is associated with an increased risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer (mCRC). The role of extended colectomy in LS CRC is controversial. There are limited studies comparing the risk of mCRC following segmental colectomy and extended colectomy. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the risk of developing mCRC following segmental and extended colectomy for LS CRC and endoscopic compliance.

METHOD

A systematic review of major databases was performed using predefined terms. All original articles published in English comparing the risk of mCRC in LS patients after segmental and extended colectomy from 1950 to January 2016 were included.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 324 studies. Six studies involving 871 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 705 (80.9%) underwent segmental colectomy and 166 (19.1%) extended colectomy. Average follow-up was 91.2 months. The mCRC rate was 22.8% and 6% in the segmental and extended colectomy groups, respectively. The segmental group were over four times more likely to develop mCRC (OR 4.02, 95% CI: 2.01-8.04, P < 0.0001). mCRC occurred in patients after segmental colectomy despite 1-2-yearly postoperative endoscopic surveillance.

CONCLUSION

This result suggests that extended colectomy reduces the risk of mCRC by over four-fold compared with segmental colectomy. mCRC occurred in the segmental group despite postoperative endoscopic surveillance. This needs to be borne in mind when deciding on the appropriate surgical management of LS patients with CRC. We recommend that extended colectomy should be considered for patients with confirmed LS CRC.

Clinicopathological features and surgical options for synchronous colorectal cancer

This study was conducted to investigate the clinicopathological features of synchronous cancers and treatment options according to their locations.Records of 8368 patients with colorectal cancer treated at our center between July 2003 and December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. All synchronous colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment were included.Synchronous cancers were identified in 217 patients (2.6%). Seventy-nine patients underwent either total colectomy, subtotal colectomy, or total proctocolectomy; 116 underwent 1 regional resection, including local excision; and 22 underwent 2 regional resections. The mean age was 62 years, slightly higher than that for the single-cancer patients. Synchronous cancers were more common in male patients, more frequently located in the left colon, had more microsatellite instability-high status, and showed more advanced stage than single cancer. Extensive resection was mainly performed for synchronous cancers located in both the right and left colon. Two regional resections were performed for cancers in the right colon and rectum. There were no differences in complication rates or the occurrence of metachronous cancer between the 2-region resection and extensive resection groups. Eight years postoperatively, the mean number of daily bowel movements for these 2 groups were 1.9 and 4.3, respectively.We found that synchronous cancer was different from single cancer in terms of age, gender, location, and pathologic features. Synchronous colorectal cancer requires different treatment strategy according to the distribution of lesions. Comparison between the 2 regional resections and extensive resection approaches suggests that 2 regional resections are preferable.

Laparoscopic Deloyers procedure for tension-free anastomosis after extended left colectomy: technique and results

BACKGROUND

The Deloyers procedure, which includes inversion of the right colon around the axis of the ileocolic vessels, can be used to achieve a well vascularized, tension-free colorectal anastomosis after extended left colectomy. The aim of this study is to report our technique and outcome in a series of ten consecutive patients who underwent right colonic transposition by laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

Charts were retrospectively reviewed to analyze postoperative outcome and bowel function. A video was recorded to demonstrate the procedure.

RESULTS

Conversion was required in one (10%) patient due to extensive adhesions. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Anastomotic leakage occurred in one (10%) case and was managed with peritoneal lavage and ileostomy. Six months after surgery, all patients reported a median number of 2.5 (range 2-3) bowel movements per day with solid stool consistency. Neither anastomotic stricture nor bowel ischemia was found at 1-year endoscopic follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our experience shows that laparoscopic right colonic transposition is a safe and feasible procedure and provides good functional outcomes.

Long-term functional outcome of colonic resections: how much does faecal impairment influence quality of life?

AIM

Older data suggest that colonic resection has a negative impact on continence and quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of colonic resections for colonic cancer and diverticulitis and its influence on quality of life.

METHODS

Patients who underwent colonic resection between 2005 and 2013 were identified from a prospective database. A survey with two questionnaires [Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) scale, Short Form 12 (SF-12)] and additional questions concerning bowel function was sent to all patients.

RESULTS

Colonic resection was performed in 362 patients in the study period; 297 patients returned the questionnaires (response rate 82.0%). Faecal urgency or incontinence more than once a month was present in 15% of patients and 25% of patients reported that bowel symptoms limited their quality of life. The mean total FIQL score for all patients was 3.58. The SF-12 score was comparable to a reference population without prior colonic resection. Patients after right-sided resections had liquid stool more often than others (45.3% vs 38.7%, P = 0.011). No differences in bowel function and quality of life were detected between resections for colonic cancer and diverticulitis.

CONCLUSION

Most patients experience no limitation in bowel function after segmental colectomy. Those with limitations in bowel function still seem to cope well, as the quality of life is not severely affected. Nevertheless, most patients with lower functional scores also had lower quality of life scores. Whether surgery is a relevant factor has to be questioned, as the prevalence of faecal incontinence in a comparable population without prior surgery is almost identical.

Factors Associated With the Performance of Extended Colonic Resection vs. Segmental Resection in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES:

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates are rising. This group is susceptible to heritable conditions (i.e., Lynch syndrome (LS)) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with high metachronous CRC rates after segmental resection. Hence, extended colonic resection (ECR) is often performed and considered generally in young patients. As there are no population-based studies analyzing resection extent in early-onset CRC, we used CDC Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) data to assess state-wide operative practices.

METHODS:

Using CER and Louisiana Tumor Registry data, all CRC patients aged ≤50 years, diagnosed in Louisiana in 2011, who underwent surgery in 2011–2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Prevalence of, and the factors associated with operation type (ECR including subtotal/total/proctocolectomy vs. segmental resection) were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Of 2,427 CRC patients, 274 were aged ≤50 years. In all, 234 underwent surgery at 53 unique facilities and 6.8% underwent ECR. Statistically significant ECR-associated factors included age ≤45 years, polyposis, synchronous/metachronous LS-associated cancers, and IBD. Abnormal microsatellite instability (MSI) was not ECR-associated. ECR was not performed in sporadic CRC.

CONCLUSIONS:

ECR is performed in the setting of clinically obvious associated high-risk features (polyposis, IBD, synchronous/metachronous cancers) but not in isolated/sporadic CRC. However, attention must be paid to patients with seemingly lower risk characteristics (isolated CRC, no polyposis), as LS can still be present. In addition, the presumed sporadic group requires further study as metachronous CRC risk in early-onset sporadic CRC has not been well-defined, and some may harbor undefined/undiagnosed hereditary conditions. Abnormal MSI (LS risk) is not associated with ECR; abnormal MSI results often return postoperatively after segmental resection has already occurred, which is a contributing factor.

Laparoscopic 3D high-definition Deloyers procedure: when, how, why?

After extensive mobilization and resection of the left colon, colorectal anastomosis may result impossible due to the distance between the remaining colon and the rectal stump. The Deloyers procedure represents an interesting alternative to total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. In this manuscript, we describe when and how to perform this technique with a mini-invasive approach. We also report the case of a patient who underwent Deloyers procedure, due to early ischemia of the descending colon after left colectomy.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for locally advanced colon cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Background

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), or Lynch syndrome, accounts for 3 % of newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer. While a partial or subtotal colectomy is indicated for early stage disease, there is a paucity of data addressing locally advanced disease involving the foregut.

Case presentation

We report two patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer presenting with locally advanced colon cancer surgically managed by pancreaticoduodenectomy with en bloc partial colectomy and a review of the literature.

Conclusions

Locally advanced colorectal cancer in HNPCC is a rare clinical entity that requires special surgical consideration. Multidisciplinary treatment, including multi-visceral resection, offers the best long-term outcome.

Managing young colorectal cancer: a UK and Irish perspective

OBJECTIVE

Young patients with familial syndromes have an increased metachronous cancer rate. Effective management is possible by identifying this high-risk group prior to index colectomy. The study surveys the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) membership preoperative evaluation and clinical management in young patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHOD

An electronic survey was sent to the membership of the ACPGBI. The survey polled members on clinical scenarios relating to young-onset CRC patients. We were particularly concerned with preoperative management strategies, the extent of colectomy, and postoperative surveillance. Survey responses were collated and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 124 members responded to the survey and 74 completed the survey. Of these, 87.8 % would proceed to colectomy without preoperative tumor or genetic testing. Decisions regarding the extent of colectomy depended on family history. A total of 67 (90.6 %) would offer a limited colectomy with no family history, 49 (66.2 %) in a patient with familial CRC type X, 29 (39.2 %) in a young patient with Lynch syndrome. A similar trend was seen with young rectal cancer. Only 16 surgeons (21.6 %) could identify a syndrome of MYH-associated polyposis (MAP).

CONCLUSION

The majority of ACPGBI members will not offer preoperative risk testing based on a young age alone; however, the majority would alter their surgical strategy based on the results of this testing. MAP is poorly recognized by ACPGBI members and therefore an opportunity exists for education among members. WHAT IS NEW IN THIS PAPER?: This study is the first paper to survey the ACPGBI membership on management practices in young-onset CRC. Members are poor in adopting preoperative testing, alter surgical strategy based on a familial syndrome, with a minority recognizing MAP. An opportunity to improve education on young CRC patients exists.

Segmental vs extended colectomy in the management of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The optimal surgical approach to the management of colorectal cancer in the setting of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is contentious. While some advocate total colectomy, others perform segmental resection followed by regular endoscopic surveillance. This systematic review evaluates the evidence for segmental colectomy (SC) and total (extended) colectomy (TC) in the management of HNPCC.

METHOD

Two major databases (PubMed and Cochrane) were searched using predefined terms. All original articles, published in English, comparing the oncological outcomes of SC and TC in HNPCC patients from January 1950 to July 2013 were included.

RESULTS

Eighty-four studies were identified. After applying exclusion criteria, six studies involving 948 patients were included (mean age 47.4 years, 51.8% male). SC was more commonly performed than TC (n = 780; 82.3%). Mean follow-up was 106.5 months. Metachronous high-risk adenomas were detected more often after SC, although the difference was not statistically significant (23.4% vs 9.6%; OR 2.258, P = 0.057). Metachronous cancers occurred more frequently after SC than after TC (23.5% vs 6.8%; OR 3.679, P < 0.005). However, there was no difference in overall survival (90.7% vs 89.8% for SC and TC, respectively; P = 0.085). Only one study reported operative mortality (0% in each group), there was no report of operative morbidity or functional outcome.

CONCLUSION

The optimal surgical approach in the management of HNPCC remains unclear. More adenomas and cancers occur after SC than after TC but there certainly is no evidence to suggest that more radical surgery leads to improved survival.

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic (HAL) Multiple Segmental Colorectal Resections: Are They Feasible and Safe?

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of synchronous hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) segmental colorectal resections. The surgical options for synchronous colonic pathology include extensive colonic resection with single anastomosis, multiple synchronous segmental resections with multiple anastomoses, or staged resections. Traditionally, multiple open, synchronous, segmental resections have been performed. There is a lack of data on HAL multiple segmental colorectal resections. A retrospective chart review was compiled on all patients who underwent HAL synchronous segmental colorectal resections by all the colorectal surgeons from our Group during the period of 1999 to 2014. Demographics, operative details, and short-term outcomes are reported. During the period, 9 patients underwent HAL synchronous multiple segmental colorectal resections. There were 5 women and 4 men, with median age of 54 (24-83) years and median BMI of 24 (19.8-38.7) kg/m(2). Two patients were on long-term corticosteroid therapy. The median operative time was 210 (120-330) minutes and median operative blood loss was 200 (75-300) mLs. The median duration for return of bowel function was 2 days and the median length of stay was 3.5 days. We had 2 minor wound infections. There were no deaths. Synchronous segmental colorectal resections with anastomoses using the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique are safe. Early conversion to open and use of stomas are advisable in challenging cases.

The molecular basis of rectal cancer

The majority of rectal carcinomas are sporadic in nature, and relevant testing for driver mutations to guide therapy is important. A thorough family history is necessary and helpful in elucidating a potential hereditary predilection for a patient's carcinoma. The adequate diagnosis of a heritable tendency toward colorectal carcinoma alters the management of a patient disease and permits the implementation of various surveillance algorithms as preventive measures.

Modified right colon inversion technique as a salvage procedure for colorectal or coloanal anastomosis

AIM

A tension-free well vascularized colorectal or coloanal anastomosis is not always possible following rectal or sigmoid resection. The study reports on the short-term and long-term outcome of a modified right colon inversion technique as a means of facilitating a low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis.

METHOD

All patients who underwent right colonic inversion, a modified Deloyers' procedure, were identified retrospectively from the prospective database of the Colorectal Department of the Royal Marsden Hospital from October 2008 to December 2013.

RESULTS

There were 14 (nine male) patients of median age 58.7 (45-75) years. The main indication was extensive diverticular disease (50%) and previous colonic surgery (21.4%). A defunctioning stoma was performed in 64.3% which was reversed in all within 3-6 months. Three (21.4%) patients developed postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo 1-2) and none required reoperation. The median duration of follow-up was 11 months. One (7.2%) patient had one bowel movement per day, 10 (71.4%) patients had two bowel movements per day and three (21.4%) patients had three per day.

CONCLUSION

The modified right colonic inversion technique is safe and achieves intestinal continuity with a tension-free well vascularized anastomosis. Good function and low morbidity show that the procedure is a credible alternative to ileorectal or ileoanal anastomosis.

Prophylactic colectomy: Rationale, indications, and approach

Discerning the genetics of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes has enabled a more individualized approach to preventing and treating colorectal cancers in affected patients and families. As these syndromes carry significant risk of colorectal cancer (nearly 100% in some cases), prophylactic colectomy is an important option for preventing cancer. This article addresses the rationale and indications for prophylactic colectomy in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, and provides insight into the details of surgical management.

Immediate outcome, long-term function and quality of life after extended colectomy with ileorectal or ileosigmoid anastomosis

AIM

Total/subtotal colectomy with ileorectal (IRA) or ileosigmoid (ISA) anastomosis is associated with various reported rates of morbidity, function and quality of life. Our object was to determine these end-points in a series of patients undergoing these operations in our institution.

METHOD

All patients who underwent IRA or ISA between 1994 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients (female 49%) with a median age of 54.2 (16.8-90.6) years underwent 338 IRA or ISA (in 18 patients the anastomosis was done twice) for inflammatory bowel disease (n = 96), polyposis (n = 95) and colorectal cancer (n = 97). Mortality and morbidity rates were 1.2% (n = 4) and 19.5% (n = 66) and 47 surgical complications (13.9%) occurred, including 26 (7.7%) cases of anastomotic leakage, leading to 23 re-operations. After a median follow-up of 49 (0-196) months, 262 patients still had a functioning anastomosis; 45 patients had died and 13 had a proctectomy. Information on function was obtained in 51.4% (133/259) of the cohort after a median follow-up of 77 (10-196) months. The mean (± standard deviation) rates of 24 h and nocturnal defaecation were 3.6 ± 2.4 and 0.5 ± 0.9. A disturbance of faecal or flatus continence occurred in 20% and 21% of patients. There was no case of faecal incontinence to solid stool. The mean SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales were 46.3 ± 9.3 and 51.9 ± 9.3. Multivariate analysis showed that IRA and inflammatory bowel disease were both independently associated with poorer long-term function.

CONCLUSION

Colectomy with IRA or ISA is safe with low postoperative morbidity and mortality. The employment of IRA and inflammatory bowel disease appear to be independent negative factors on function in multivariate analysis.

Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review

AIM

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) and extended lympha-denectomy (EL) have been proposed as safe procedures for improving colon cancer survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after such techniques for colon cancer.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after CME or EL. Three major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were searched. The review included original articles reporting outcomes after CME or EL from January 1950 to July 2012.

RESULTS

Twenty-one, predominately retrospective, studies involving 5246 patients (mean age 68.2 years, 56.5% men) were included. Reporting of outcomes was inconsistent. Median follow up was 60 months. The operative mortality rate was 3.2% and the cumulative morbidity rate was 21.5%. The weighted mean local recurrence rate and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 4.5%, 58.1% and 77.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The available data for CME and EL have numerous fundamental limitations that prohibit adoption. Contemporary controlled studies are required before universal recommendation.

Segmental versus extended resection for sporadic colorectal cancer in young patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Guidelines on the management of colon cancer state that extensive colectomy should be "considered" for patients of young age (<50). This study aimed to compare the risk of metachronous cancer, overall recurrence and mortality between segmental and extended colon resections in patients under the age of 50 with sporadic CRC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients age <50 undergoing surgery for CRC from 1991 to 2009. Patients were divided into two groups based on extent of resection: segmental versus extended. The primary outcomes analyzed were metachronous tumors, disease recurrence, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy one patients underwent segmental resection and 30 underwent extended resection. 3.3% in the segmental resection group developed metachronous CRC versus 0% in the extended resection group (P = 0.61). There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence or mortality for those who underwent a segmental resection compared to those with an extended resection. In a regression model, type of surgery was not an independent risk factor for recurrence or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended colectomy for sporadic CRC in patients younger than 50 does not improve disease-free or overall survival. Further study to determine if segmental resection is appropriate oncologic treatment is warranted.

Surgical treatment of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome)

The surgical management of the Lynch syndrome patient with colorectal cancer needs to be individualized. Because of the increased incidence of synchronous and metachronous colorectal neoplasms, most favor an extended resection at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Age of diagnosis, stage of the tumor, co-morbidities, surgical expertise, surgical morbidity, and patient wishes should be taken into account when considering a surgical procedure. There are no prospective randomized trials or retrospective trials suggesting that patients undergoing an extended procedure have a survival advantage compared to those undergoing segmental resection. In retrospective studies it has been demonstrated that patients undergoing extended procedures will develop less metachronous colorectal neoplasms and will undergo less subsequent surgical procedures related to colorectal cancer. In females abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingoophorectomy should be considered at the time of surgery for colorectal cancer.

Management of colonic obstruction: a review

Large bowel obstruction is a common problem with many different causes, the most common being colorectal adenocarcinoma, extracolonic adenocarcinoma, diverticular disease, volvulus, and inflammatory bowel disease. The nature of the obstruction can influence the best management. Historically, treatment of obstruction consisted of surgical removal of the obstruction if possible and decompression of the bowel with an ostomy. Other strategies for managing obstruction have evolved as alternatives to stomas, including primary resection with anastomosis and endoscopic stent placement. The choice of treatment can therefore be tailored to the individual patient with good success.

Options and outcome for reconstruction after extended left hemicolectomy

AIM

A tension-free anastomosis is required to minimize anastomotic leakage after an extended left colectomy when the residual transverse colon is too short to spontaneously reach the pelvis. To resolve this problem, colonic rotation with a right colonic transposition (RCT) or even with a complete intestinal derotation (CID) is mandatory. This study compared these two techniques.

METHOD

Between January 2001 and December 2011, 39 patients had undergone right colonic transposition (n = 29) or complete intestinal derotation (n = 10) after an extended left colectomy. All anastomotic complications had been recorded during the follow up.

RESULTS

No differences were found between right colonic transposition and complete intestinal derotation in terms of patient characteristics, surgical indications, therapeutic features and risk factors for anastomotic leakage (sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, diabetes, bevacizumab use, colorectal anastomotic level or protective stoma use). Ligature of the middle colic artery was significantly more frequent with right colonic transposition than with complete intestinal derotation (82.7% vs 50%; P = 0.04). An additional colonic resection tended to be required more often in the right colonic transposition group than in the complete intestinal derotation group (55.1% vs 20%; P = 0.054). The anastomotic complication rate was 10.2% and was not significantly different between right colonic transposition and complete intestinal derotation (6.9% vs 20%, P = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Both colonic rotation techniques are feasible and safe. The right colonic transposition and complete intestinal derotation techniques yielded similar results in terms of colorectal anastomotic complications, but right colonic transposition required ligature of the middle colic artery and additional colonic resection tended to be required more frequently.

Quality of life after surgery for colon cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome: partial versus subtotal colectomy

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome is a disorder caused by mismatch repair gene mutations. Mutation carriers have a high risk of developing colorectal cancer. In patients with Lynch syndrome in whom colon cancer has been diagnosed, in general, subtotal colectomy instead of partial colectomy is recommended because of the substantial risk of metachronous colorectal cancer. However, the effect of more extensive surgery on quality of life and functional outcome is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate quality of life and functional outcome in patients with Lynch syndrome after partial colectomy and subtotal colectomy.

DESIGN

This is a nationwide cross-sectional study in the Netherlands.

SETTINGS

Two quality-of-life questionnaires (Short Form-36 and The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Module) and a functional outcome questionnaire (Colorectal Functional Outcome) were used.

PATIENTS

Patients with Lynch syndrome who underwent surgery for colon cancer were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were quality of life and functional outcome.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were sent to 192 patients with Lynch syndrome who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. A total of 136 patients returned the questionnaire (response rate, 71%). Eighteen patients with rectal cancer, 9 patients with a permanent ileostomy, and 5 patients with an IPAA were excluded. Fifty-one patients underwent partial colectomy, and 53 underwent subtotal colectomy. None of the scales of the Short Form-36 survey showed a significant difference. Analysis of the Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire revealed that, after subtotal colectomy, patients have a significantly higher stool frequency (p ≤ 0.01) and a significantly higher score on stool-related aspects (p = 0.06) and social impact (p = 0.03). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Module presented more problems with defecation after subtotal colectomy (p ≤ 0.01).

LIMITATIONS

Certain selection bias cannot be ruled out.

CONCLUSIONS

Although functional outcome is worse after subtotal colectomy than after partial colectomy, generic quality of life does not differ after the 2 types of surgery in Lynch syndrome. When discussing the options for surgery with the patient, all advantages and disadvantages of both surgical procedures, including quality of life and functional outcome, should be discussed.

Emergency management of acute colonic cancer obstruction

Emergency management of obstructing colonic cancer depends on both tumor location and stage, general condition of the patient and surgeon's experience. Right sided or transverse colon obstructing cancers are usually treated by right hemicolectomy-extended if necessary to the transverse colon-with primary anastomosis. For left-sided obstructing cancer, in patients with low surgical risk, primary resection and anastomosis associated with on-table irrigation or manual decompression can be performed. It prevents the confection of a loop colostomy but presents the risk of anastomotic leakage. Subtotal or total colectomy allows the surgeon to encompass distended and fecal-loaded colon, and to perform one-stage resection and anastomosis. Its disadvantage is an increased daily frequency of stools. It must be performed only in cases of diastatic colon perforation or synchronous right colonic cancer. In patients with high surgical risk, Hartmann procedure must be preferred. It allows the treatment of both obstruction and cancer, and prevents anastomotic leakage but needs a second operation to reverse the colostomy. Colonic stenting is clinically successful in up to 90% in specialized groups. It is used as palliation in patients with disseminated disease or bridge to surgery in the others. If stent insertion is not possible, loop colostomy is still indicated in patients at high surgical risk.

Preoperative diagnosis of Lynch syndrome with DNA mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on a diagnostic biopsy

BACKGROUND

DNA mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on tumor tissue is a simple, readily available, and cost-effective method of identifying patients with Lynch syndrome in the postoperative setting. The aim of the study was to assess whether the mismatch repair status of a colorectal cancer can be confirmed by mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsy.

DESIGN

Germline positive patients with Lynch syndrome were identified from a prospectively collected Familial Cancer Clinic database. Preoperative colorectal cancer biopsy specimens were obtained from the source pathology provider to generate a cohort of matched preoperative and postoperative specimens. The specimens were sectioned and stained for 4 mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). An age-matched cohort to compare specimens was selected from Bethesda positive but mismatch repair immunohistochemistry negative patients. All slides were reviewed by a single blinded pathologist. The Wilson method was used to calculate a true underlying proportion of patients for whom the preoperative result matched the postoperative test result with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Of 128 germline positive mutation carriers, 40 patients (mean age 41, SD 11.3) had colorectal resections. Thirty-three preoperative specimens were retrievable and were matched with biopsies from 33 controls. The germline mutations included in the study were 8 MLH1, 19 MSH2, 3 MSH6, and 2 PMS2. In patients where germline positive status was known, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 89.2-100) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 89.2-100). Identical sensitivity and specificity were observed in 33 age-matched patients. The sensitivity of the endoscopic biopsy in predicting germline status was 94.9% (95% CI 80.4-98.3).

CONCLUSION

The mismatch repair disease status of a colorectal cancer can be reliably confirmed by mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on a diagnostic colorectal cancer biopsy sample before definitive surgery. Ascertaining a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome before definitive surgery can influence surgical planning.