Increasing steroid hormone receptors expression defines breast cancer subtypes non responsive to preoperative chemotherapy

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer

Introduction

Infiltration of breast tumors by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has been associated with sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. However, it is unclear whether this is true within the estrogen receptor-alpha (ER)-negative subset of breast tumors that frequently manifest high TIL levels.

Methods

The association of TIL with short-term and long-term clinical response to anthracycline-based therapy was assessed in two independent ER-negative breast cancer cohorts in which patients were categorized as TIL-high or TIL-low. We defined an eight-gene lymphocyte mRNA expression signature (including CD19, CD3D, CD48, GZMB, LCK, MS4A1, PRF1, and SELL) and used unsupervised hierarchical clustering to examine the association between TIL and short-term response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a previously published cohort of ER-negative tumors (n = 113). We also examined the association between TIL and long-term chemotherapeutic efficacy in a second cohort of ER-negative tumors (n = 255) with longer than 6 years of median follow-up by using tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for detection of CD3, CD8, CD4, CD20, and TIA-1.

Results

In patients with ER-negative tumors treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, pathologic complete responses (pCRs) were achieved by 23 (74%) of 31 TIL-high patients and 25 (31%) of 80 TIL-low patients (odds ratio (OR), 6.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.49 to 16.08; P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression with standard clinicopathologic features demonstrated that only tumor size (P = 0.037) and TIL status (P = 0.001) were independent predictors of anthracycline response. In the second cohort, adjuvant anthracycline-based therapy was associated with increased disease-free survival (DFS) only in patients with high levels of intraepithelial CD3⁺ TIL (P = 0.0023). In contrast, outcomes after CMF treatment (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) showed no association with CD3 status. In both cohorts, cytotoxic T-cells were the primary TIL subtype associated with anthracycline sensitivity. Finally, TIL significantly predicted anthracycline sensitivity for both the Her2-positive and triple-negative tumor phenotypes.

Conclusions

ER-negative breast cancers with high levels of TIL have heightened sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy, as assessed by the immediate response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term outcome following adjuvant therapy. Investigations of TIL-based predictive tests to identify patients likely to benefit from anthracycline-based treatments are warranted.

Neoadjuvant Therapy - What Have We Achieved in the Last 20 Years?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with large, inoperable tumors or inflammatory breast cancer, but it is also increasingly considered for women with operable disease. Several randomized trials have demonstrated that anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimens in operable breast cancer were equally effective in terms of disease-free or overall survival regardless of whether they were administered postoperatively or preoperatively. Further neoadjuvant treatment allows for a higher rate of breast conserving surgery. Tumor responses in terms of pathologic complete remission after short-term chemotherapy will probably only serve as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome in some molecular breast cancer subtypes like the triple-negative, HER2-positive, and some luminal B subsets. Recent trials showed that in HER2-positive disease pCR rates were as high as 70% when 2 HER2-targeted agents were added to chemotherapy.

Plasma miR-221 as a predictive biomarker for chemoresistance in breast cancer patients who previously received neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly being used in breast cancer treatment. Research has revealed an elevated expression of miR-221 in adriamycinresistant MCF-7/ADR cells. This study aimed to explore the potential role of miR-221 as a biomarker for chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients who previously received NAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The expression levels of circulating miR-221 in the plasma of 93 breast cancer patients who previously received NAC and in 32 healthy individuals were assessed. The correlations between miR-221 and clinicopathological features and chemosensitivity were also analysed.

RESULTS

The expression level of miR-221 was significantly associated with hormone receptor (HR) status (p = 0.008). Patients with higher plasma miR-221 levels tended to be HR-negative. Patients with different miR-221 levels had significant differences in the overall response rate (p = 0.044) but not in the pathologic complete response rate (p = 0.477).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that plasma miR-221 may be a predictive biomarker for sensitivity to NAC in breast cancer patients.

Proteomic identification of predictive biomarkers of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in luminal breast cancer: a possible role for 14-3-3 theta/tau and tBID?

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy resistance is a major obstacle in effective neoadjuvant treatment for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The ability to predict tumour response would allow chemotherapy administration to be directed towards only those patients who would benefit, thus maximising treatment efficiency. We aimed to identify putative protein biomarkers associated with chemotherapy resistance, using fresh tumour samples with antibody microarray analysis and then to perform pilot clinical validation experiments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy resistant and chemotherapy sensitive tumour samples were collected from breast cancer patients who had received anthracycline based neoadjuvant therapy consisting of epirubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel. A total of 5 comparative proteomics experiments were performed using invasive ductal carcinomas which demonstrated estrogen receptor positivity (luminal subtype). Protein expression was compared between chemotherapy resistant and chemotherapy sensitive tumour samples using the Panorama XPRESS Profiler725 antibody microarray containing 725 antibodies from a wide variety of cell signalling and apoptosis pathways. A pilot series of archival samples was used for clinical validation of putative predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

AbMA analysis revealed 38 differentially expressed proteins which demonstrated at least 1.8 fold difference in expression in chemotherapy resistant tumours and 7 of these proteins (Zyxin, 14-3-3 theta/tau, tBID, Pinin, Bcl-xL, RIP and MyD88) were found in at least 2 experiments. Clinical validation in a pilot series of archival samples revealed 14-3-3 theta/tau and tBID to be significantly associated with chemotherapy resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, antibody microarrays have been used to identify proteins associated with chemotherapy resistance using fresh breast cancer tissue. We propose a potential role for 14-3-3 theta/tau and tBID as predictive biomarkers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer. Further validation in a larger sample series is now required.

[Primary systemic therapy in breast cancer patients (2007-2010)]

INTRODUCTION/AIM

The importance of preoperative neoadjuvant (NA) systemic treatment in operable breast cancer has significantly increased in the last few years. The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the effect of NA therapy in breast cancer patients treated in our unit and analyze radiological and pathological response rates in the context of surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and fourteen cases of breast cancer with NA therapy were analyzed and clinical data were collected from March 2007 to December 2010. Twenty-two patients received NA treatment for inoperable tumours. As far as operable cancers (92 patients), the indications for NA treatment were high tumour grade, presence of axillary metastasis and relatively young age. 5-Fluorouracil-Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamid or Taxotere-Epirubicin regimens were administered in 6 cycles followed by radiological evaluation and surgery. Herein, we compared the preoperative staging with the pathological results after surgery.

RESULTS

NA therapy resulted in complete regression in 17% of patients, significant regression in 21%, while moderate regression was achieved in 43% of patients. No regression was detected in 19%. The decrease in T stage was not followed by decrease in N stage in significant number of cases. Moreover, in some cases NA therapy caused complete radiological regression, while histologically it still remained positive. In certain cases, breast conserving surgery was feasible due to down-staging caused by NA therapy.

CONCLUSION

NA therapy was effective primarily in decreasing tumour size; however, it was less effective on axillary lymph node metastases. Due to the presence of the residual DCIS component, the volume of resection could not be decreased as much as down-staging of the invasive cancer would have permitted.

Predictive significance of the proportion of ER-positive or PgR-positive tumor cells in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-negative breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status are predictive factors for the clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. However, it remains unclear as to how the proportion of ER-positive or PgR-positive tumor cells affects the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We examined the correlation of the proportion of ER-positive or PgR-positive tumor cells with the clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. From April 2002 to October 2010, 103 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing epirubicin and taxane in our clinic. A clinical response was observed in 86 (83%) patients, and a pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in 16 (16%) patients. Fourteen (30%) of 46 patients with ER-negative tumors achieved pCR and 15 (26%) of 57 patients with PgR-negative tumors achieved pCR. Patients with more than 30% ER-positive tumor cells or more than 1% PgR-positive tumor cells did not achieve pCR. No significant correlation was observed between pCR and the menopausal status, tumor size, grade and Ki-67 expression. In univariate analysis, pCR was associated with the ER status (p=0.001), PgR status (p=0.0001) and chemotherapy regimens (p=0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that ER and PgR status were significant factors for pCR, and patients with ER-negative tumors were 18.6 times more likely to achieve pCR than those with greater than or equal to 30% ER-positive tumor cells (p=0.006; 95% confidence interval 2.3-149.9). We demonstrated a predictive significance of the proportion of ER-positive or PgR-positive tumor cells in the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-negative breast cancer. ER-negativity (<1%) was a significant predictive factor for achieving pCR in multivariate analysis. Conversely, patients with more than 30% ER-positive tumor cells or more than 1% PgR-positive tumor cells may not achieve pCR.

Quantum dots-based molecular classification of breast cancer by quantitative spectroanalysis of hormone receptors and HER2

The emerging molecular breast cancer (BC) classification based on key molecules, including hormone receptors (HRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been playing an important part of clinical practice guideline. The current molecular classification mainly based on their fingerprints, however, could not provide enough essential information for treatment decision making. The molecular information on both patterns and quantities could be more helpful to heterogeneities understanding for BC personalized medicine. Here we conduct quantitative determination of HRs and HER2 by quantum dots (QDs)-based quantitative spectral analysis, which had excellent consistence with traditional method. Moreover, we establish a new molecular classification system of BC by integrating the quantitative information of HER2 and HRs, which could better reveal BC heterogeneity and identify 5 molecular subtypes with different 5-year prognosis. Furthermore, the emerging 5 molecular subtypes based on simple quantitative molecules information could be as informative as multi-genes analysis in routine practice, and might help formulate a more personalized comprehensive therapy strategy and prognosis prediction.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics

A pathological complete remission (pCR) is rarely achieved by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2-) tumors. Therefore, its use might be questionable in specific groups of this tumor type. To select which patients benefit and which could be spared neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we tested standard pathology and molecular markers in ER+ HER2- breast tumors. Pretreatment biopsies were available from 211 ER+ HER2- tumors, who had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (adriamycin/cyclophosphamide). mRNA expression data were available for 132 tumors. We determined progesterone receptor expression (PR), endocrine sensitivity, HER2 expression, histology, proliferation, and molecular subtypes. We correlated these data to chemotherapy response using pCR rates and the previously published neoadjuvant response index (NRI). PR-negative tumors (n = 65, 30.8%) and luminal B type tumors (n = 43, 20.4%) responded significantly better to chemotherapy than other tumors. These associations remained significant in multivariate analysis. However, even in the subgroup of patients with the lowest response rate, comprising tumors that had both a positive-PR expression and the luminal A subtype (n = 58, 44%), the majority of the patients had downstaging because of chemotherapy. For histology (lobular vs. ductal), endocrine sensitivity, and proliferation, no associations with chemotherapy response were observed. Gene expression array analysis resulted in 28 significant genes (FDR < 0.1). PR expression and luminal B status are associated with a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, both markers had only weak response predictive power, and it was not possible to identify a subgroup with no or only minimal chemotherapy benefit. Therefore, the decision to refrain from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to ER+ HER2- breast tumors should not be based on predictive markers, but exclusively on estimates of prognosis.

The neoadjuvant approach in breast cancer treatment: it is not just about chemotherapy anymore

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in breast cancer was once reserved for patients with locally advanced disease or inflammatory breast cancers, it is increasingly used in patients with early-stage tumors. This review outlines the pertinent research in the field over the last year and discusses the clinical implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The present review will focus on three evolving areas in the neoadjuvant research field: factors determining response, use of endocrine and biologic therapies, and how to manage patients following response.

SUMMARY

NCT in breast cancer is a remarkable research platform providing insight into tumor biology and treatment efficacy in an expedited timeframe. Refining patient selection based on tumor and patient characteristics allows clinicians to limit potentially toxic therapy to those patients expected to receive the greatest benefit. Additionally, exploring new agents and sequencing of regimens based on these characteristics has great potential for impacting local-regional and systemic outcomes. Lastly, as the population of patients undergoing NCT grows, we must constantly adjust our treatment paradigms. We need to monitor them carefully and accurately, understand the implication of a treated tumor for future therapy, and determine how much additional therapy is necessary.

High estrogen receptor expression in early breast cancer: chemotherapy needed to improve RFS?

One of the most controversial questions in early breast cancer treatment is the need of chemotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor positive disease. Therefore, we analyzed a group of patients with high estrogen receptor (ER) expression to scrutinize the role of chemotherapy in this situation. To gauge the effect of chemotherapy on recurrence free survival (RFS) three treatment modalities were compared: endocrine treatment only, chemoendocrine treatment, and chemotherapy. 3,971 breast cancer patients whose treatment modalities as well as ER level were known, were included in this retrospective analysis. Their level of ER expression was documented as immunoreactive score (IRS). A high ER group was defined as ER IRS ≥ 9; primary endpoint was RFS. RFS was associated with ER, with the best outcome for strong and the worst result for negative expression. Adjusted to Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), RFS did not differ between the treatment cohorts of endocrine treatment and chemoendocrine treatment (P = 0.828) in the high ER group. Patients with chemotherapy alone fared significantly worse (P = 0.003). Even in high risk patients (according to NPI) the chemoendocrine and the endocrine treatment only groups did not differ significantly (HR = 1.15; 95% CI (0.56-2.34), P = 0.709). Omission of endocrine treatment led to significantly worse outcome (P = 0.013). In conclusion, RFS was significantly longer in patients with high ER expression than with weak or no ER expression. In the high expression group, there was no significant difference in RFS between endocrine treatment only and chemoendocrine therapy-even in high risk patients, for whom chemoendocrine treatment is routinely indicated. It seems insufficient for high ER patients to only consider tumor size, nodal status, and grading in order to decide which patient will benefit from adding chemotherapy to endocrine treatment.

Traditional molecular markers and response to adjuvant endocrine or trastuzumab-based therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The accurate assessment of traditional molecular markers is essential to inform the choice of the adjuvant systemic treatments for patients with breast cancer. Extensive research efforts have been made to explore whether it is also possible to predict the actual response to the different therapeutic options based on the expression of these markers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endocrine responsiveness of breast cancer has been eventually defined according to the expression of estrogen receptors in at least 1% of invasive tumor cells. The quantitative evaluation of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors (PgR) and Ki-67 labeling index may help in selecting patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative tumors who can be spared or may benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. Guideline recommendations for an optimal testing of estrogen receptors and PgR have been issued to assist pathologists in the accurate assessment of these markers. Progress has also been made in the identification of candidate patients to HER2-targeted therapies and in the prediction of response to trastuzumab.

SUMMARY

Traditional molecular markers play a major role in the selection of candidate patients to systemic interventions, but they are of limited value in predicting their actual response to the different treatments, especially when the markers are evaluated individually.

Effect of neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy in different biological breast cancer phenotypes: overall results from the GeparTrio study

In order to explore the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on clinical mid-course and pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery in different biological breast cancer subtypes. The GeparTrio study included 2,072 patients with operable or locally advanced breast cancer. After two cycles with docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) patients were randomized according to their clinical response. Clinical and biological factors were assessed for predicting clinically mid-course response and pCR at surgery. The overall pCR rate, defined as no invasive residuals in breast and axilla, was 20.5%. The highest pCR rate of 57% was observed in patients below 40 years of age with triple negative or grade 3 tumors. Independent factors for mid-course response and pCR were: young age, non-T4 tumors, high grade, and hormone receptor status, the strongest single predictive factor. Within the biological subtypes, grading was an independent factor to predict pCR for luminal tumors, clinical tumor stage for the HER2 like tumors and age for the triple negative ones. Grading gave independent information for mid-course response within the triple negative group. No factor predicted mid-course response within the other groups. Grading and age can identify subgroups within the luminal and triple negative patients who have an increased benefit from NACT.

Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response

ER, PR and HER2 status in breast cancer are important markers for the selection of drug therapy. By immunohistochemistry (IHC), three major breast cancer subtypes can be distinguished: Triple negative (TN(IHC)), HER2+(IHC) and Luminal(IHC) (ER+(IHC)/HER2-(IHC)). By using the intrinsic gene set defined by Hu et al. five molecular subtypes (Basal(mRNA), HER2+(mRNA), Luminal A(mRNA), Luminal B(mRNA) and Normal-like(mRNA)) can be defined. We studied the concordance between analogous subtypes and their prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We classified 195 breast tumors by both IHC and mRNA expression analysis of patients who received neoadjuvant treatment at the Netherlands Cancer institute for Stage II-III breast cancer between 2000 and 2007. The pathological complete remission (pCR) rate was used to assess chemotherapy response. The IHC and molecular subtypes showed high concordance with the exception of the HER2+(IHC) group. 60% of the HER2+(IHC) tumors were not classified as HER2+(mRNA). The HER2+(IHC)/Luminal A or B(mRNA) group had a low response rate to a trastuzumab-chemotherapy combination with a pCR rate of 8%, while the HER2+(mRNA) group had a pCR rate of 54%. The Luminal A(mRNA) and Luminal B(mRNA) groups showed similar degrees of response to chemotherapy. Neither the PR status nor the endocrine responsiveness index subdivided the ER+(IHC) tumors accurately into Luminal A(mRNA) and Luminal B(mRNA) groups. Molecular subtyping suggests the existence of a HER2+(IHC)/Luminal(mRNA) group that responds poorly to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. For Luminal(IHC) and triple negative(IHC) tumors, further subdivision into molecular subgroups does not offer a clear advantage in treatment selection.