Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study

Clinical outcome of pulmonary vein isolation alone ablation strategy using VISITAG SURPOINT in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown the improvement in long-term effectiveness with standardized pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) aimed at creating durable and contiguous lesions with VISITAG SURPOINT (VS) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess efficacy of PVI alone strategy using VS in non-PAF patients and evaluate factors associated with corresponding clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent PVI for persistent/long-standing persistent AF between May 2017 to July 2019 were studied retrospectively. PVI was performed with 30-50 W guided by VS (posterior target: 400-500, anterior target: 500). Left atrial voltage maps were created during atrial pacing after PVI.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients (119 males, age 62 ± 10 years, long-standing persistent AF: 35) were included and followed for median of 454 days. No adverse events were reported in any patients during periprocedural and follow-up period of up to 28 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated that freedom from atrial tachycardia or AF (AT/AF) without antiarrhythmics at 1-year was 70%. Radiofrequency delivery with higher power was associated with increased first-pass isolation rate, but not with freedom from AT/AF. In multivariate analysis, long-standing persistent AF and % low-voltage zone (%LVZ) were independent predictors of clinical outcome. The best cut-off value of %LVZ for predicting AT/AF recurrence was 3.24%. Freedom from AT/AF was 88% in patients with persistent AF and %LVZ < 3.24%, while 27% in those with long-standing persistent AF and %LVZ ≥ 3.24%.

CONCLUSIONS

PVI alone using VS was associated with excellent 1-year success in patients with persistent AF and %LVZ < 3.24%, but was insufficient in those with long-standing persistent AF and/or %LVZ ≥ 3.24%.

Comparison of high-power and conventional-power radiofrequency energy deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint

Introduction

Negative component abolition of the unipolar signal (unipolar signal modification [USM]) reflects the lesion transmurality. The purpose of this study was to compare the procedural safety and outcome between high‐power and conventional‐power atrial radiofrequency applications during a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using USM as a local endpoint.

Methods and Results

High‐power (50 W) and conventional‐power (25‐40 W) applications were compared among 120 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent a USM‐guided PVI. The first 60 patients were treated with conventional‐power (CP) group and last 60 with high‐power (HP) group. The atrial radiofrequency applications lasted for 5 to 10 seconds (CP group) or 3 to 5 seconds (HP group) after the USM. All procedures were performed using 3D mapping systems with image integration and esophageal temperature monitoring. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The HP group had fewer acute PV reconnections (62% vs 78%; P = .046) and a reduced procedure time (119.3 ± 28.1 vs 140.1 ± 51.2 minutes; P = .04). Freedom from recurrence after a single ablation procedure without any antiarrhythmic drugs was higher in the HP group than CP group (88.3% vs 73.3% at 12‐months after the procedure, log‐rank; P = .0423). There were no major complications that required any intervention.

Conclusions

The high‐power PVI guided by USM decreased the procedural time and may improve the procedural outcomes without compromising the safety.