Stereotactic radiosurgery and ipilimumab for patients with melanoma brain metastases: clinical outcomes and toxicity

Hypofractionated radiation therapy with versus without immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with brain metastases: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with brain metastases (BM) remain controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of HFRT with and without ICIs in BM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to 25 December 2018 for studies that compared the efficacy and safety of HFRT with and without ICIs in BM patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies involving 2,365 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with those of HFRT without ICIs, the 6-month locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate (P = 0.002), 6-month overall survival (OS) rate (P = 0.001), 1-year OS rate (P = 0.001), 2-year OS rate (P = 0.007), and median OS (mOS) (P < 0.001) were significantly improved in combined HFRT and ICI treatment. A trend toward improved 1-year LRFS rate (P = 0.392) and 3-year OS rate (P = 0.266) for the ICI arm was observed compared with the non-ICI arm, although there was no statistically significant difference between the two arms. No significant difference in toxicity was found between the two arms (radionecrosis: P = 0.361; BM hemorrhage: P = 0.738).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HFRT without ICIs, the combination of these two therapies improved efficacy but did not increase toxicity in patients with BM.

Complications associated with immunotherapy for brain metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Median survival after the diagnosis of brain metastases has historically been on the order of months. With the recent development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, intracranial activity and durable responses have been observed in brain metastases on multiple phase 2 clinical trials, which have primarily been conducted in patients with melanoma. Immune-related adverse events related to checkpoint inhibitor therapy of brain metastasis can present unique challenges for the clinician and underscore the need for a multidisciplinary team in the care of these patients. The goal of this review is to address the current knowledge, limitations of understanding, and future directions in research regarding immune therapy trials and neurologic toxicities based on retrospective, prospective, and case studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Immune therapy has the potential to exacerbate symptomatic edema and increase the risk of radiation necrosis in previously irradiated lesions. Neurologic toxicities will likely increase in prevalence as more patients with brain metastatic disease are eligible for immune therapy.

SUMMARY

An improved understanding and heightened awareness of the unique neurologic toxicities that impact this patient group is vital for mitigating treatment-related morbidity and mortality.

The impact of current treatment modalities on the outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review

Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) still have a very poor prognosis. Several treatment modalities have been investigated in an attempt to improve the management of MBM. This review aimed to evaluate the impact of current treatments for MBM on patient‐ and tumor‐related outcomes, and to provide treatment recommendations for this patient population. A literature search in the databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane was conducted up to January 8, 2019. Original articles published since 2010 describing patient‐ and tumor‐related outcomes of adult MBM patients treated with clearly defined systemic therapy were included. Information on basic trial demographics, treatment under investigation and outcomes (overall and progression‐free survival, local and distant control and toxicity) were extracted. We identified 96 eligible articles, comprising 95 studies. A large variety of treatment options for MBM were investigated, either used alone or as combined modality therapy. Combined modality therapy was investigated in 71% of the studies and resulted in increased survival and better distant/local control than monotherapy, especially with targeted therapy or immunotherapy. However, neurotoxic side‐effects also occurred more frequently. Timing appeared to be an important determinant, with the best results when radiotherapy was given before or during systemic therapy. Improved tumor control and prolonged survival can be achieved by combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. However, more randomized controlled trials or prospective studies are warranted to generate proper evidence that can be used to change the standard of care for patients with MBM.

Concurrent Radiosurgery and Systemic Therapies for Melanoma Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review

Intracranial metastatic melanoma is a major challenge for neuro-oncological teams. Historically, treatment has focused on surgical or radiosurgical treatment of appropriate lesions, mostly for palliative purposes. Immunotherapies and other targeted therapies (BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors (BRAFi/MEKi)) are mainstays of advanced melanoma therapy, yet the optimal timing and synergistic properties of concurrent combinations of these systemic therapies and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are poorly understood. We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE and Scopus databases focused on outcomes after therapy using SRS and either immunotherapies or targeted therapies in an effort to define the optimal timing. We defined concurrent therapy as SRS within three months of treatment with any systemic therapy. End points included local control, distant control, overall survival, and toxicities. We identified five retrospective cohort studies from the literature. These studies found that concurrent SRS plus immunotherapy or BRAFi/MEKi is well tolerated by most patients and generally improved local control, distant control, and overall survival. Importantly, no significant increases in toxicities were noted with concurrent therapy. Combining concurrent SRS with immunotherapy or BRAFi/MEKi may offer important advances for patients with intracranial metastatic melanoma. To address interstudy heterogeneity, we propose reporting two major time intervals defining “concurrent treatment”: concurrent-SRS (≤4 weeks) and peri-SRS (≤3 months). Future large-scale, prospective trials considering truly concurrent SRS therapies with systemic therapies are desperately needed.

Contemporary practice patterns of stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: A review of published Australian literature

There has been a shift in the management of brain metastasis (BM), with increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and delaying/avoiding whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), given the concern regarding the long-term neurocognitive effect and quality of life impact of WBRT. It is, however, unclear as to the contemporary practice pattern and outcomes of SRS in Australia. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and MEDLINE using a series of keywords: 'stereotactic', 'radiosurgery' and 'brain metastases', limiting to Australian studies, which report on clinical outcomes following SRS. Eight studies - one randomized trial and seven retrospective cohort studies - were identified and included in this review. A total of 856 patients were included, with the most common primary tumour types being melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer. Approximately half of the patients had solitary BM, while 7% had 10 or more BM lesions. SRS is not routinely given in combination with WBRT. The 6-month intracranial control and 1-year intracranial control following SRS were reported in the range of 67-87% and 48-82%, respectively, whereas the 1-year overall survival and 2-year overall survival were reported in the range of 37-60% and 20-36%, respectively. There are limited data reported on SRS-related toxicities in all included studies. Overall, despite increasing use of SRS for BM, there is a low number of published Australian series in the literature. There is a potential role for establishing an Australian clinical quality registry or collaborative consortium for SRS in BM, to allow for systematic prospective data collection, and benchmarking of quality and outcomes of SRS.

Integrated treatment of brain metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optimal treatment of brain metastases has been limited to local treatment with few systemic options. Increasing use of systemic targeted therapies, chemotherapy and immunotherapy and combination of local and systemic treatments has resulted in plethora of publications. We review the existing evidence for individual treatments and new evidence for the integration of systemic and combination of local treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Encouraging efficacy of systemic therapies supports combination of systemic and local treatment albeit with little randomized trial data. Efficacy particularly of targeted agents provides an opportunity to delay local treatments including radiosurgery and whole brain radiotherapy. Randomized trials testing the integration of surgery, radiotherapy and radiosurgery are reviewed with emphasis on patient relevant endpoints to guide the clinician in the choice and sequence of treatments and integrating systemic and local therapies.

SUMMARY

There is increasing tendency to use focused radiation for single and oligometastases with or without surgery and decline in whole brain radiotherapy which is limited to multiple metastases in tumours without effective systemic options. Systemic therapies have promising intracranial efficacy and the sequence and combination with localized radiation is awaiting trials. Changes in practice with a move to primary systemic treatment for brain metastases without radiation, should be undertaken with caution and close monitoring.

The role of the immune system in brain metastasis

Metastatic brain tumors are the most common brain tumors in adults. With numerous successful advancements in systemic treatment of most common cancer types, brain metastasis is becoming increasingly important in the overall prognosis of cancer patients. Brain metastasis of peripheral tumor is the result of complex interplay of primary tumor, immune system and central nervous system microenvironment. Once formed, brain metastases hide behind the blood brain barrier and become inaccessible to chemotherapies that are otherwise successful in targeting systemic cancer. The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for several common cancers such as advanced melanoma and lung cancers brings with it the opportunity and obligation to further understand the mechanisms of immunosuppression by tumors that spread to the brain as well as the interaction between the brain environment and tumor microenvironment. In this review paper we define the central role of the immune system in the development of brain metastases. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature to outline the molecular mechanisms of immunosuppression used by tumors and how the immune system interacts with the central nervous system to facilitate brain metastasis. In particular we discuss the tumor-type-specific mechanisms of metastasis of cancers that preferentially metastasize to the brain as well as the therapies that effectively modulate the immune response, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and vaccines.

Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: Incidence, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Challenges, and Future Opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a major dose-limiting adverse event of radiotherapy. The incidence rate of RN varies with the radiotherapy modality, total dose, dose fractionation, and the nature of the lesion being targeted. In addition to these known and controllable features, there is a stochastic component to the occurrence of CRN-the genetic profile of the host or the lesion and their role in the development of CRN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies provide some insight into the genetic mechanisms underlying radiation-induced brain injury. In addition to these incompletely understood host factors, the diagnostic criteria for CRN using structural and functional imaging are also not clear, though multiple structural and functional imaging modalities exist, a combination of which may prove to be the ideal diagnostic imaging approach. As the utilization of novel molecular therapies and immunotherapy increases, the incidence of CNR is expected to increase and its diagnosis will become more challenging. Tissue biopsies can be insensitive and suffer from sampling biases and procedural risks. Liquid biopsies represent a promising, accurate, and non-invasive diagnostic strategy, though this modality is currently in its infancy. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of CRN will expand and optimize the diagnosis and management of CRN by better utilizing existing treatment options including bevacizumab, pentoxifylline, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and laser interstitial thermal therapy.

Radiotherapy for Melanoma: More than DNA Damage

Despite its reputation as a radioresistant tumour, there is evidence to support a role for radiotherapy in patients with melanoma and we summarise current clinical practice. Melanoma is a highly immunogenic tumour and in this era of immunotherapy, there is renewed interest in the potential of irradiation, not only as an adjuvant and palliative treatment, but also as an immune stimulant. It has long been known that radiation causes not only DNA strand breaks, apoptosis, and necrosis, but also immunogenic modulation and cell death through the induction of dendritic cells, cell adhesion molecules, death receptors, and tumour-associated antigens, effectively transforming the tumour into an individualised vaccine. This immune response can be enhanced by the application of clinical hyperthermia as evidenced by randomised trial data in patients with melanoma. The large fraction sizes used in cranial radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy are more immunogenic than conventional fractionation, which provides additional radiobiological justification for these techniques in this disease entity. Given the immune priming effect of radiotherapy, there is a strong but complex biological rationale and an increasing body of evidence for synergy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are now first-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic melanoma. There is great potential to increase local control and abscopal effects by combining radiotherapy with both immunotherapy and hyperthermia, and a combination of all three modalities is suggested as the next important trial in this refractory disease.

Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly utilized to treat the resection cavity following resection of brain metastases and recent randomized trials have confirmed postoperative SRS as a standard of care. Postoperative SRS for resected brain metastases improves local control compared to observation, while also preserving neurocognitive function in comparison to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, even with surgery and SRS, rates of local recurrence at 1 year may be as high as 40%, especially for larger cavities, and there is also a known risk of leptomeningeal disease after surgery. Additional treatment strategies are needed to improve control while maintaining or decreasing the toxicity profile associated with treatment. Preoperative SRS is discussed here as one such approach. Preoperative SRS allows for contouring of an intact metastasis, as opposed to an irregularly shaped surgical cavity in the post-op setting. Delivering SRS prior to surgery may also allow for a “sterilizing” effect, with the potential to increase tumor control by decreasing intra-operative seeding of viable tumor cells beyond the treated cavity, and decreasing risk of leptomeningeal disease. Because there is no need to treat brain surrounding tumor in the preoperative setting, and since the majority of the high dose volume can then be resected at surgery, the rate of symptomatic radiation necrosis may also be reduced with preoperative SRS. In this mini review, we explore the potential benefits and risks of preoperative vs. postoperative SRS for brain metastases as well as the existing literature to date, including published outcomes with preoperative SRS.