NADPH oxidase 1-dependent ROS is crucial for TLR4 signaling to promote tumor metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer

The Regulatory Role of Rolipram on Inflammatory Mediators and Cholinergic/Adrenergic Stimulation-Induced Signals in Isolated Primary Mouse Submandibular Gland Cells

Exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) induces inflammatory signals in salivary glands. We investigated the regulatory role of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor rolipram on inflammatory mediators and cholinergic/adrenergic stimulation-induced intracellular Ca(2+) signaling in salivary acinar and ductal cells. Submandibular gland (SMG) expressed PDE4A through 4D mRNA and PDE4 was localized in the luminal membrane of SMG. LPS induced Ca(2+) signaling and ROS production in SMG. Treatment with rolipram blocked LPS-induced Ca(2+) increase and ROS production. The application of histamine evoked Ca(2+) signals and ROS production, which were attenuated by rolipram in SMG cells. Moreover, LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome and cleaved caspase-1 were inhibited by rolipram. The inhibitory role of rolipram in ROS-induced Ca(2+) signaling was mainly observed in acinar cells and not in ductal cells. Rolipram also protected SMG acinar but not ductal cells from LPS-induced cell membrane damage. In the case of cholinergic/adrenergic stimulation, carbachol/isoproterenol-induced Ca(2+) signals were upregulated by the treatment of rolipram in SMG. In the case of cAMP-dependent ductal bicarbonate secretion by rolipram, no effect was observed on the modulation of ductal chloride/bicarbonate exchange activity. Rolipram could suppress the inflammatory signals and could be a potential therapeutic strategy against LPS-induced inflammation to protect the salivary gland cells.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cancer: Role of antioxidative nutraceuticals

Extensive research over the past half a century indicates that reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in cancer. Although low levels of ROS can be beneficial, excessive accumulation can promote cancer. One characteristic of cancer cells that distinguishes them from normal cells is their ability to produce increased numbers of ROS and their increased dependence on an antioxidant defense system. ROS are produced as a byproduct intracellularly by mitochondria and other cellular elements and exogenously by pollutants, tobacco, smoke, drugs, xenobiotics, and radiation. ROS modulate various cell signaling pathways, which are primarily mediated through the transcription factors NF-κB and STAT3, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, kinases, growth factors, cytokines and other proteins, and enzymes; these pathways have been linked to cellular transformation, inflammation, tumor survival, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis of cancer. ROS are also associated with epigenetic changes in genes, which is helpful in diagnosing diseases. This review considers the role of ROS in the various stages of cancer development. Finally, we provide evidence that nutraceuticals derived from Mother Nature are highly effective in eliminating cancer cells.

NOX1 mediates chemoresistance via HIF1α/MDR1 pathway in gallbladder cancer

NADPH oxidase 1 (NOX1) plays a key role in tumorigenesis and metastasis through generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), an important intracellular signaling molecule. However, how it is expressed in gallbladder cancer (GBC) tissue sample and whether it associates with GBC chemoresistance have never been investigated. Our study analyzed the relationship between NOX1 expression and cisplatin-sensitivity both in vivo and in vitro. We found that reduced NOX1 expression promoted cisplatin efficiency in GBC-SD cells, whereas overexpression of which potentially inhibited the sensitivity of cisplatin in SGC-996 cells. Further study into the mechanism we found that increased NOX1 expression elevated intracellular ROS levels, which then activated HIF-1α/MDR1 pathway. These findings established NOX1 a novel accelerant of chemoresistance in GBC, and NOX1-targeted therapeutics might be exploited as a strategy for increasing the efficacy of cisplatin treatment.

MicroRNA-125b promotes tumor metastasis through targeting tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Lung cancer, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. There is a great need to identify critical effectors involved in metastasis of NSCLC that will facilitate the development of new therapeutic strategies. Here we evaluated the potential role of miR-125b in the metastasis of NSCLC cells.

Methods

Human NSCLC cells were isolated from surgical tissues with Cancer Cell Isolation Kit. Expressions of miR-125b and TP53INP1 were detected with real-time PCR and western blot. Human miR-125b mimics, miR-125b inhibitor, TP53INP1 expression plasmid and TP53INP1 siRNA were transfected into NSCLC cells with nucleofector transfection kit. NSCLC metastasis was determined with adhesion assay, invasive assay and lung tumor metastasis model.

Results

The expression of miR-125b was significantly higher in poorly differentiated NSCLC cells that are endowed with high metastatic potentials. Up-regulation of miR-125b could enhance the metastatic potential of NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo, while down-regulation of miR-125b resulted in decreased metastatic potentials in vitro and in vivo. Further, tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1 (TP53INP1) was an important target of miR-125b involved in metastasis of NSCLC cells. TP53INP1 served as a negative regulator of NSCLC metastasis. Decreased expression of TP53INP1 in tumor tissues was inversely associated with their expression of miR-125b, significantly lower in poorly differentiated tumors and inversely correlated with the clinical stages in patients with NSCLC.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrated that miR-125b promoted tumor metastasis via targeting TP53INP1 in human NSCLC cells, which uncovered a real clinical relevance of microRNAs in tumor biology, and provided novel potential candidates for NSCLC clinical practice.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12935-015-0233-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.