Cognitive-behavioral treatment with and without response prevention for bulimia

A comparison of two psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa: implications for models of maintenance

In an effort to elucidate the role of cognitive factors in the maintenance of bulimia nervosa, the efficacy of two psychological treatments was examined in a randomised control trial: cognitive behaviour therapy in the absence of explicit exposure instructions was compared with exposure and response prevention treatment in the absence of cognitive restructuring procedures. In the short term both treatments were successful at effecting substantial improvement in both the specific and the non-specific psychopathology of the disorder. However, at a one year follow up, whilst improvements were well maintained for those who had received the cognitive-behavioural treatment, virtually all of those who had responded to the purely behavioural treatment had relapsed. This provides some support for the cognitive model of the maintenance of bulimia nervosa. Nevertheless, the two treatment groups could not be distinguished on post-treatment measures of cognitive disturbance and neither was it the case that residual levels of cognitive disturbance, as assessed, predicted relapse. This may suggest that the level at which the necessary cognitive change takes place may not be accessible by conventional assessment procedures.

Exposure with response prevention treatment of anorexia nervosa-bulimic subtype and bulimia nervosa

Binge exposure with response-prevention of bingeing (ERP-B) was evaluated in 20 female Ss within an inpatient eating disorders unit over 9 sessions as an adjunct to standard milieu therapy. Subjects met DSM-III-R criteria for either bulimia nervosa (BN) (n = 13) or the bulimic subtype of anorexia nervosa (AN-B) (n = 7). The average age of the Ss in each group was 26.5 (+/- 8.8) and 24.1 +/- 6.0) yr, respectively. Results indicate significant within-session and pre-post treatment effects in self-report measures 'urge to binge', 'lack of control', 'feelings of guilt' and 'tension'. Further analysis revealed that the AN-B subgroup had significantly greater reduction in 'depression' and 'urge to vomit' compared to the BN group. This study provides preliminary evidence that ERP-B deserves further investigation with long-term follow-up in both BN and AN-B patients and may be particularly advantageous in the AN-B subpopulation.

Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?

A detailed comparison was made of two methods for assessing the features of eating disorders. An investigator-based interview was compared with a self-report questionnaire based directly on that interview. A number of important discrepancies emerged. Although the two measures performed similarly with respect to the assessment of unambiguous behavioral features such as self-induced vomiting and dieting, the self-report questionnaire generated higher scores than the interview when assessing more complex features such as binge eating and concerns about shape. Both methods underestimated body weight.

The treatment of bulimia nervosa

Bulimia nervosa is a significant source of morbidity amongst young women. There has been a considerable body of work on its treatment since it was first described in 1979. Three treatments have shown particular promise: antidepressant drug treatment, cognitive behaviour therapy and exposure with response prevention. The research findings indicate that the approach of choice is cognitive behaviour therapy, with most patients benefiting significantly and the changes being well maintained. However, cognitive behaviour therapy is neither necessary nor sufficient for all patients with bulimia nervosa: some benefit from simpler interventions whilst others fail to respond. At present, too little is known about the factors that predict response to particular forms of treatment to allow the matching of patients with treatments.