Autodigestion and RecA-dependent cleavage of Ind- mutant LexA proteins

Mutant LexA proteins with specific defects in autodigestion

In self-processing biochemical reactions, a protein or RNA molecule specifically modifies its own structure. Many such reactions are regulated in response to the needs of the cell by an interaction with another effector molecule. In the system we study here, specific cleavage of the Escherichia coli LexA repressor, LexA cleaves itself in vitro at a slow rate, but in vivo cleavage requires interaction with an activated form of RecA protein. RecA acts indirectly as a coprotease to stimulate LexA autodigestion. We describe here a new class of lexA mutants, lexA (Adg-; for autodigestion-defective) mutants, termed Adg- for brevity. Adg- mutants specifically interfered with the ability of LexA to autodigest but left intact its ability to undergo RecA-mediated cleavage. The data are consistent with a conformational model in which RecA favors a reactive conformation capable of undergoing cleavage. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a mutation in a regulated self-processing reaction that impairs the rate of self-processing without markedly affecting the stimulated reaction. Had wild-type lexA carried such a substitution, discovery of its self-processing would have been difficult; we suggest that, in other systems, a slow rate of self-processing has prevented recognition that a reaction is of this nature.

Identification of essential residues for the catalytic function of 85-kDa cytosolic phospholipase A2. Probing the role of histidine, aspartic acid, cysteine, and arginine

Cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) hydrolyzes the sn-2-acyl ester bond of phospholipids and shows a preference for arachidonic acid-containing substrates. We found previously that Ser-228 is essential for enzyme activity and is likely to function as a nucleophile in the catalytic center of the enzyme (Sharp, J. D., White, D. L., Chiou, X. G., Goodson, T., Gamboa, G. C., McClure, D., Burgett, S., Hoskins, J., Skatrud, P. L., Sportsman, J. R., Becker, G. W., Kang, L. H., Roberts, E. F., and Kramer, R. M.(1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 14850-14853). cPLA2 contains a catalytic aspartic acid motif common to the subtilisin family of serine proteases. Substitution within this motif of Ala for Asp-549 completely inactivated the enzyme, and substitutions with either glutamic acid or asparagine reduced activity 2000- and 300-fold, respectively. Additionally, using mutants with cysteine replaced by alanine, we found that Cys-331 is responsible for the enzyme's sensitivity to N-ethylmaleimide. Surprisingly, substituting alanine for any of the 19 histidines did not produce inactive enzyme, demonstrating that a classical serine-histidine-aspartate mechanism does not operate in this hydrolase. We found that substituting alanine or histidine for Arg-200 did produce inactive enzyme, while substituting lysine reduced activity 200-fold. Results obtained with the lysine mutant (R200K) and a coumarin ester substrate suggest no specific interaction between Arg-200 and the phosphoryl group of the phospholipid substrate. Arg-200, Ser-228, and Asp-549 are conserved in cPLA2 from six species and also in four nonmammalian phospholipase B enzymes. Our results, supported by circular dichroism, provide evidence that Asp-549 and Arg-200 are critical to the enzyme's function and suggest that the cPLA2 catalytic center is novel.

Structure of the UmuD' protein and its regulation in response to DNA damage

For life to be sustained, mistakes in DNA repair must be tolerated when damage obscures the genetic information. In bacteria such as Escherichia coli, DNA damage elicits the well regulated 'SOS response'. For the extreme case of damage that cannot be repaired by conventional enzymes, there are proteins that allow the replication of DNA through such lesions, but with a reduction in the fidelity of replication. Essential proteins in this mutagenic process are RecA, DNA polymerase III, UmuD, UmuD' and UmuC (umu: UV mutagenesis). Regulation of this response involves a RecA-mediated self-cleavage of UmuD to produce UmuD'. To understand this system in more detail, we have determined the crystal structure of the E. coli UmuD' mutagenesis protein at 2.5 A resolution. Globular heads folded in an unusual Beta-structure associate to form molecular dimers, and extended amino-terminal tails associate to produce crystallized filaments. The structure provides insight into the mechanism of the self-cleavage reaction that UmuD-like proteins undergo as part of the global SOS response.

Fos leucine zipper variants with increased association capacity

The Fos wild-type leucine zipper is unable to support homodimerization. This finding is generally explained by the negative net charge of the Fos zipper leading to the electrostatic repulsion of two monomers. Using a LexA-dependent in vivo assay in Escherichia coli, we show here that additional antideterminants for Fos zipper association are the residues in position a within the Fos zipper interface. If the wild-type Fos zipper is fused to the DNA binding domain of the LexA repressor (LexA-DBD), no excess repression is observed as compared with the LexA-DBD alone, in agreement with the incapacity of the wild-type Fos zipper to promote homodimerization. If hydrophobic amino acids (Ile, Leu, Val, Phe, Met) are inserted into the five a positions of a LexA-Fos zipper fusion protein, substantial transcriptional repression is recovered showing that Fos zipper homodimerization is not only limited by the repulsion of negatively charged residues but also by the nonhydrophobic nature of the a positions. The most efficient variants (harboring Ile or Leu in the five a positions) show an about 80-fold increase in transcriptional repression as compared with the wild-type Fos zipper fusion protein. In the case of multiple identical substitutions, the overall improvement is correlated with the hydrophobicity of the inserted side chains, i.e. Ile Leu > Val > Phe > Met. However at least for Val, Phe, and Met the impact of a given residue type on the association efficiency depends strongly on the heptad, i.e. on the local environment of the a residue. This is particularly striking for the second heptad of the Fos zipper, where Val is less well tolerated than Phe and Met. Most likely the a1 residue modulates the interhelical repulsion between two glutamic acid side chains in positions g1 and e2. Most of the hydrophobic Fos zipper variants are also improved in heteroassociation with a Jun leucine zipper, such that roughly half of the additional free energy of homodimerization is imported into the heterodimer. A few candidates (including the Fos wild-type zipper) deviate from this correlation, showing considerable excess heteroassociation.

Identification of the potential active site of the signal peptidase SipS of Bacillus subtilis. Structural and functional similarities with LexA-like proteases

Signal peptidases remove signal peptides from secretory proteins. By comparing the type I signal peptidase, SipS, of Bacillus subtilis with signal peptidases from prokaryotes, mitochondria, and the endoplasmic reticular membrane, patterns of conserved amino acids were discovered. The conserved residues of SipS were altered by site-directed mutagenesis. Replacement of methionine 44 by alanine yielded an enzyme with increased activity. Two residues (aspartic acid 146 and arginine 84) appeared to be conformational determinants; three other residues (serine 43, lysine 83, and aspartic acid 153) were critical for activity. Comparison of SipS with other proteases requiring serine, lysine, or aspartic acid residues in catalysis revealed sequence similarity between the region of SipS around serine 43 and lysine 83 and the active-site region of LexA-like proteases. Furthermore, self-cleavage sites of LexA-like proteases closely resembled signal peptidase cleavage sites. Together with the finding that serine and lysine residues are critical for activity of the signal peptidase of Escherichia coli (Tschantz, W.R., Sung, M., Delgado-Partin, V.M., and Dalbey, R.E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 27349-27354), our data indicate that type I signal peptidases and LexA-like proteases are structurally and functionally related serine proteases. A model envisaging a catalytic serine-lysine dyad in prokaryotic type I signal peptidases is proposed to accommodate our observations.

A monocysteine approach for probing the structure and interactions of the UmuD protein

UmuD participates in a variety of protein-protein interactions that appear to be essential for its role in UV mutagenesis. To learn about these interactions, we have initiated an approach based on the construction of a series of monocysteine derivatives of UmuD and have carried out experiments exploring the chemistry of the unique thiol group in each derivative. In vivo and in vitro characterizations indicate that these proteins have an essentially native structure. In proposing a model for the interactions of UmuD in the homodimer, we have made the following assumptions: (i) the conformations of the mutant proteins are similar to that of the wild type, and (ii) the differences in reactivity of the mutant proteins are predominantly due to the positional effects of the single cysteine substitutions. The model proposes the following. The region including the Cys-24-Gly-25 cleavage site, Val-34, and Leu-44 are closer to the interface than the other positions tested as suggested by the relative ease of dimer cross-linking of the monocysteine derivatives at these positions by oxidation with iodine (I2) and by reaction with bis-maleimidohexane. The mutant with a Ser-to-Cys change at position 60 (SC60) is similar in iodoacetate reactivity to the preceding derivatives but cross-links less efficiently by I2 oxidation. This suggests that Ser-60, the site of the putative nucleophile in the cleavage reaction, is located further from the dimer interface or in a cleft region. Both Ser-19, located in the N-terminal fragment of UmuD that is removed by RecA-mediated cleavage, and Ser-67 are probably not as close to the dimer interface, since they are cross-linked more easily with bis-maleimidohexane than with I2. The SC67 mutant phenotype also suggests that this position is less important in RecA-mediated cleavage but more important in a subsequent role for UmuD in mutagenesis. Ala-89, Gln-100, and Asp-126 are probably not particularly solvent accessible and may play important roles in protein architecture.

A novel antivirulence element in the temperate bacteriophage HK022

Lysogens of the temperate lambdoid phage HK022 are immune to superinfection by HK022. Superinfection immunity is conferred in part by the action of the HK022 CI repressor at the O.R operators. In this work, we have identified an additional regulatory element involved in immunity. This site, termed OFR (operator far right), is located just downstream of the cro gene, more than 250 nucleotides distant from OR. The behavior of phage containing a mutation in OFR suggests that the wild-type site functions as an antivirulence element. HK022 OFR- mutants were able to form turbid plaques indistinguishable from those of the wild type. However, they gave rise to virulent derivatives at a far higher frequency than the wild type (approximately 10(-5) for OFR- versus about 10(-9) for the wild type). This frequency was so high that cultures of HK022 OFR- lysogens were rapidly overgrown by virulent derivatives. Whereas virulent mutants arising from a wild-type OFR+ background contained mutations in both OR1 and OR2, virulent derivatives of the OFR- mutant phage contained a single mutation in either OR1 or OR2. We conclude that the wild-type OFR site functions to prevent single mutations in OR from conferring virulence. The mechanism by which OFR acts is not yet clear. Both CI and Cro bound to OFR and repressed a very weak rightward promoter (PFR). It is unlikely that repression of PFR by CI or Cro binding to OFR can account in full for the antivirulence phenotype conferred by this element, since PFR is such a weak promoter. Other models for the possible action of OFR are discussed.

LexA and lambda Cl repressors as enzymes: specific cleavage in an intermolecular reaction

During the SOS response, LexA repressor is inactivated by specific cleavage. Although cleavage requires RecA protein in vivo, RecA acts indirectly as a coprotease by stimulating an inherent self-cleavage activity of LexA. In lambda lysogens, cleavage of lambda Cl repressor in a similar but far slower reaction results in prophage induction. We describe an intermolecular cleavage reaction in which the C-terminal fragment of LexA acted as an enzyme to cleave other molecules of LexA. The C-terminal fragment of lambda repressor cleaved the LexA substrates about as efficiently as did the LexA enzyme, suggesting that the slow rate of Cl self-cleavage results from a weak interaction between its cleavage site and the active site.

Functional domains of the AraC protein

The AraC protein, which regulates the L-arabinose operons in Escherichia coli, was dissected into two domains that function in chimeric proteins. One provides a dimerization capability and binds the ligand arabinose, and the other provides a site-specific DNA-binding capability and activates transcription. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that a fusion protein consisting of the N-terminal half of the AraC protein and the DNA-binding domain of the LexA repressor dimerizes, binds well to a LexA operator, and represses expression of a LexA operator-beta-galactosidase fusion gene in an arabinose-responsive manner. In vivo and in vitro experiments also showed that a fusion protein consisting of the C-terminal half of the AraC protein and the leucine zipper dimerization domain from the C/EBP transcriptional activator binds to araI and activates transcription from a PBAD promoter-beta-galactosidase fusion gene. Dimerization was necessary for occupancy and activation of the wild-type AraC binding site.

Phosphate starvation and low temperature as well as ultraviolet irradiation transcriptionally induce the Escherichia coli LexA-controlled gene sfiA

The LexA repressor controls the expression of several SOS genes, such as lexA, recA and sfiA, which are induced by DNA damage. Induction results from the activation of the RecA protein that favours the cleavage and thus the inactivation of LexA. It has been shown that the activation of RecA results from its binding to damaged DNA. It is therefore believed that in growing bacteria, in the absence of any DNA-damaging treatment, the intracellular level of LexA remains stable at a high basal level and, hence, SOS genes are expressed at relatively low basal levels. In contrast, we show here that the intracellular level of LexA and the rate of transcription of the sfiA gene may vary markedly throughout the growth cycle of wild-type Escherichia coli. We provide evidence that such changes result from two superimposed processes: proteolytic cleavage of LexA upon dilution of stationary phase bacteria, and increase in strength of the promoters of the lexA and sfiA genes when bacteria approach the stationary phase. We show that a signal which strongly increases the strength of the sfiA gene promoter is starvation for phosphate. Such induction was not significantly affected by mutations either in phoB (encoding the transcriptional regulator for the phosphate regulon) or rpoS (encoding a putative stationary phase-specific sigma factor). However, sfiA induction by phosphate starvation appeared to be markedly inhibited by the presence of the osmZ205 mutation which alters the histone-like protein H-NS, suggesting that changes in the DNA structure may play a role in signal transduction during phosphate starvation. As previously shown for several processes which are controlled by H-NS, induction of sfiA was modulated by growth temperature.

In vitro analysis of mutant LexA proteins with an increased rate of specific cleavage

Specific cleavage of LexA repressor plays a crucial role in the SOS response of Escherichia coli. In vivo, cleavage requires an activated form of RecA protein. However, previous work has shown that the mechanism of cleavage is unusual, in that the chemistry of cleavage is probably carried out by residues in the repressor, and not those in RecA; RecA appears to facilitate this reaction, acting as a coprotease. We recently described a new type of lexA mutation, a class termed lexA (IndS) and here called IndS, that confers an increased rate of in vivo cleavage. Here, we have characterized the in vitro cleavage of these IndS mutant proteins, and of several double mutant proteins containing an IndS mutation and one of several mutations, termed Ind-, that decrease the rate of cleavage. We found, first, that the autodigestion reaction for the IndS mutant proteins had a higher maximum rate and a lower apparent pKa than wild-type LexA. Second, the IndS mutations had little or no effect on the rate of RecA-mediated cleavage, measured at low protein concentrations, implying that the value of Kcat/Km was unaffected. Third, the rate of autodigestion for the double-mutant proteins, relative to wild-type, was about that rate predicted from the product of the effects of the two single mutations. Finally, by contrast, these proteins displayed the same rate of RecA-mediated cleavage as did the single Ind- mutant protein. We interpret these data to mean that the IndS mutations mimic to some extent the effect of RecA on cleavage, perhaps by favoring a conformational change in LexA. We present and analyze a model that embodies these conclusions.

The enhanced mutagenic potential of the MucAB proteins correlates with the highly efficient processing of the MucA protein

Inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli requires the direct action of the chromosomally encoded UmuDC proteins or functional homologs found on certain naturally occurring plasmids. Although structurally similar, the five umu-like operons that have been characterized at the molecular level vary in their ability to enhance cellular and phage mutagenesis; of these operons, the mucAB genes from the N-group plasmid pKM101 are the most efficient at promoting mutagenesis. During the mutagenic process, UmuD is posttranslationally processed to an active form, UmuD'. To explain the more potent mutagenic efficiency of mucAB compared with that of umuDC it has been suggested that unlike UmuD, intact MucA is functional for mutagenesis. To examine this possibility, we have overproduced and purified the MucA protein. Although functionally similar to UmuD, MucA was cleaved much more rapidly both in vitro and in vivo than UmuD. In vivo, restoration of mutagenesis functions to normally nonmutable recA430, recA433, recA435, or recA730 delta(umuDC)595::cat strains by either MucA+ or mutant MucA protein correlated with the appearance of the cleavage product, MucA'. These results suggest that most of the differences in mutagenic phenotype exhibited by MucAB and UmuDC correlate with the efficiency of posttranslational processing of MucA and UmuD rather than an inherent activity of the unprocessed proteins.

Isolation and characterization of LexA mutant repressors with enhanced DNA binding affinity

The LexA repressor from Escherichia coli is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein that shows no pronounced sequence homology with any of the known structural motifs involved in DNA binding. Since little is known about how this protein interacts with DNA, we have selected and characterized a great number of intragenic, second-site mutations which restored at least partially the activity of LexA mutant repressors deficient in DNA binding. In 47 cases, the suppressor effect of these mutations was due to an Ind- phenotype leading presumably to a stabilization of the mutant protein. With one exception, these second-site mutations are all found in a small cluster (amino acid residues 80 to 85) including the LexA cleavage site between amino acid residues 84 and 85 and include both already known Ind- mutations as well as new variants like GN80, GS80, VL82 and AV84. The remaining 26 independently isolated second-site suppressor mutations all mapped within the amino-terminal DNA binding domain of LexA, at positions 22 (situated in the turn between helix 1 and helix 2) and positions 57, 59, 62, 71 and 73. These latter amino acid residues are all found beyond helix 3, in a region where we have previously identified a cluster of LexA (Def) mutant repressors. In several cases the parental LexA (Def) mutation has been removed by subcloning or site-directed mutagenesis. With one exception, these LexA variants show tighter in vivo repression than the LexA wild-type repressor. The most strongly improved variant (LexA EK71, i.e. Glu71----Lys) that shows an about threefold increased repression rate in vivo, was purified and its binding to a short consensus operator DNA fragment studied using a modified nitrocellulose filter binding assay. As expected from the in vivo data, LexA EK71 interacts more tightly with both operator and (more dramatically) with non-operator DNA. A determination of the equilibrium association constants of LexA EK71 and LexA wild-type as a function of monovalent salt concentration suggests that LexA EK71 might form an additional ionic interaction with operator DNA as compared to the LexA wild-type repressor. A comparison of the binding of LexA to a non-operator DNA fragment further shows that LexA interacts with the consensus operator very selectively with a specificity factor of Ks/Kns of 1.4 x 10(6) under near-physiological salt conditions.

Genetic identification of the DNA binding domain of Escherichia coli LexA protein

Two genetic approaches were taken to define the DNA binding domain of LexA protein, the repressor of the Escherichia coli SOS regulon. First, several dominant negative lexA mutants defective in DNA binding were isolated. The mutations altered amino acids in a region similar to the helix-turn-helix, a DNA binding domain of other repressors and DNA binding proteins. Second, the region encoding the predicted DNA recognition helix was subjected to oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis and mutant LexA proteins with altered or relaxed specificity for several recA operator positions were isolated. By examining the effects of a series of amino acid substitutions on repressor specificity, it was shown that a glutamic acid residue at position 45 in LexA protein is important for recognition of the first base pair (G.C) in the recA operator.

Mutant LexA proteins with an increased rate of in vivo cleavage

LexA repressor of Escherichia coli is inactivated by a specific cleavage reaction that requires activated RecA protein in vivo. This cleavage reaction can proceed in vitro in the presence of activated RecA or as an intramolecular RecA-independent reaction, termed autodigestion, that is stimulated by alkaline pH. Here we describe a set of LexA mutant proteins that undergo a greatly increased rate of specific cleavage in vivo, compared with wild-type LexA. Efficient in vivo cleavage of these mutant proteins also took place without RecA. Several lines of evidence suggest that cleavage occurred via a mechanism similar to autodigestion. These mutations changed Gln-92, which lies near the cleavage site, to tyrosine, phenylalanine, or tryptophan. The latter mutation increased the rate of cleavage approximately 500-fold. These findings imply that the rate of wild-type LexA cleavage has been optimized during evolution to make the SOS system properly responsive to DNA-damaging treatments. Availability of these mutants will aid in the understanding of rate-limiting steps in intramolecular reactions.

Repression of the E coli recA gene requires at least two LexA protein monomers

To analyze the DNA binding domain of E coli LexA repressor and to test whether the repressor binds as a dimer to DNA, negative dominant lexA mutations affecting the binding domain have been isolated. A large number of amino acid substitutions between amino acid positions 39 and 46 were introduced using cassette mutagenesis. Mutants defective in DNA binding were identified and then examined for dominance to lexA+. A number of substitutions weakened repressor function partially, whereas other substitutions led to a repressor with no demonstrable activity and a defective dominant phenotype. Since the LexA binding site has dyad symmetry, we infer that this dominance results from interaction of monomers of wild-type LexA protein with mutant monomers and that an oligomeric form of repressor binds to operator. The binding of LexA protein to operator DNA was investigated further using a mutant protein, LexA408, which recognizes a symmetrically altered operator mutant but not wild-type operator. A mixture of mutant LexA408 and LexA+ proteins, but neither individual protein, bound to a hybrid recA operator consisting of mutant and wild-type operator half sites. These results suggest that at least 1 LexA protein monomer interacts with each operator half site. We discuss the role of LexA oligomer formation in binding of LexA to operator DNA.

Mechanism of specific LexA cleavage: autodigestion and the role of RecA coprotease

Specific LexA cleavage can occur under two different conditions: RecA-mediated cleavage requires an activated form of RecA, while an intramolecular self-cleavage termed autodigestion proceeds spontaneously at high pH and does not involve RecA. The two cleavage reactions are closely related. We postulate that RecA stimulates autodigestion rather than acting as a typical protease, and it is proposed to term this activity 'RecA coprotease' to emphasize this indirect role. The mechanism of autodigestion is similar to that of a serine protease, and RecA appears to act by reducing the pKa of a critical lysine residue LexA. A new class of mutants, termed lexA (IndS), is described; these mutations increase the rate of LexA cleavage.

The single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli

The single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) of Escherichia coli is involved in all aspects of DNA metabolism: replication, repair, and recombination. In solution, the protein exists as a homotetramer of 18,843-kilodalton subunits. As it binds tightly and cooperatively to single-stranded DNA, it has become a prototypic model protein for studying protein-nucleic acid interactions. The sequences of the gene and protein are known, and the functional domains of subunit interaction, DNA binding, and protein-protein interactions have been probed by structure-function analyses of various mutations. The ssb gene has three promoters, one of which is inducible because it lies only two nucleotides from the LexA-binding site of the adjacent uvrA gene. Induction of the SOS response, however, does not lead to significant increases in SSB levels. The binding protein has several functions in DNA replication, including enhancement of helix destabilization by DNA helicases, prevention of reannealing of the single strands and protection from nuclease digestion, organization and stabilization of replication origins, primosome assembly, priming specificity, enhancement of replication fidelity, enhancement of polymerase processivity, and promotion of polymerase binding to the template. E. coli SSB is required for methyl-directed mismatch repair, induction of the SOS response, and recombinational repair. During recombination, SSB interacts with the RecBCD enzyme to find Chi sites, promotes binding of RecA protein, and promotes strand uptake.

Sequence analysis and mapping of the Salmonella typhimurium LT2 umuDC operon

In Escherichia coli, efficient mutagenesis by UV requires the umuDC operon. A deficiency in umuDC activity is believed to be responsible for the relatively weak UV mutability of Salmonella typhimurium LT2 compared with that of E. coli. To begin evaluating this hypothesis and the evolutionary relationships among umuDC-related sequences, we cloned and sequenced the S. typhimurium umuDC operon. S. typhimurium umuDC restored mutability to umuD and umuC mutants of E. coli. DNA sequence analysis of 2,497 base pairs (bp) identified two nonoverlapping open reading frames spanning 1,691 bp that were were 67 and 72% identical at the nucleotide sequence level to the umuD and umuC sequences, respectively, from E. coli. The sequences encoded proteins whose deduced primary structures were 73 and 84% identical to the E. coli umuD and umuC gene products, respectively. The two bacterial umuDC sequences were more similar to each other than to mucAB, a plasmid-borne umuDC homolog. The umuD product retained the Cys-24--Gly-25, Ser-60, and Lys-97 amino acid residues believed to be critical for RecA-mediated proteolytic activation of UmuD. The presence of a LexA box 17 bp upstream from the UmuD initiation codon suggests that this operon is a member of an SOS regulon. Mu d-P22 inserts were used to locate the S. typhimurium umuDC operon to a region between 35.9 and 40 min on the S. typhimurium chromosome. In E. coli, umuDC is located at 26 min. The umuDC locus in S. typhimurium thus appears to be near one end of a chromosomal inversion that distinguishes gene order in the 25- to 35-min regions of the E. coli and S. typhimurium chromosomes. It is likely, therefore, that the umuDC operon was present in a common ancestor before S. typhimurium and E. coli diverged approximately 150 million years ago. These results provide new information for investigating the structure, function, and evolutionary origins of umuDC and for exploring the genetic basis for the mutability differences between S. typhimurium and E. coli.

Dominant negative umuD mutations decreasing RecA-mediated cleavage suggest roles for intact UmuD in modulation of SOS mutagenesis

The products of the SOS-regulated umuDC operon are required for most UV and chemical mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. The UmuD protein shares homology with a family of proteins that includes LexA and several bacteriophage repressors. UmuD is posttranslationally activated for its role in mutagenesis by a RecA-mediated proteolytic cleavage that yields UmuD'. A set of missense mutants of umuD was isolated and shown to encode mutant UmuD proteins that are deficient in RecA-mediated cleavage in vivo. Most of these mutations are dominant to umuD+ with respect to UV mutagenesis yet do not interfere with SOS induction. Although both UmuD and UmuD' form homodimers, we provide evidence that they preferentially form heterodimers. The relationship of UmuD to LexA, lambda repressor, and other members of the family of proteins is discussed and possible roles of intact UmuD in modulating SOS mutagenesis are discussed.