Homologous interactions of lambda repressor and lambda Cro with the lambda operator

Lambda cro repressor complex with OR3 operator DNA. 19F nuclear magnetic resonance observations

The interaction of lambda cro repressor with DNA is probed using synthetic 17 base-pair OR3 operators in which 5-fluorodeoxyuridine has been systematically incorporated at each of the nine positions normally occupied by a thymidine residue. By monitoring changes in chemical shift of the fluorine resonances upon cro repressor binding in aqueous buffers of varying 2H2O content, we have examined the specific cro repressor-OR3 DNA complex in detail. The results are interpreted in the context of the popular model for cro repressor-OR3 complex derived from the three-dimensional structure of the cro repressor in the absence of DNA. The results presented here not originally predicted by the model are: (1) there is an asymmetry in the environment at the two ends of the operator, although the base-pairs involved and the cro repressor dimer are symmetric; (2) there appears to be distortion of the DNA helix at two distinct positions; (3) changes of the DNA environment in the middle of the helix suggest additional DNA distortion not near the contact areas proposed in the model.

Analysis of the sequence-specific interactions between Cro repressor and operator DNA by systematic base substitution experiments

We measured quantitatively the binding affinities of purified Cro repressor to the chemically synthesized wild-type and mutant OR1 operators, consisting of all three possible base-pair substitutions and of thymine to uracil substitutions at each base-pair position of the 17-base-pair operator sequence. The sequence-specific interactions between Cro repressor and the operator DNA occur at the symmetrically disposed outer 7-base-pair positions of each half operator and at the central base-pair position. The binding of Cro is almost symmetrical with respect to the pseudo-twofold symmetry of the binding site. The binding free energy changes calculated from the affinity changes are mostly additive for specific Cro binding. Also the binding affinities of Cro to the operators or any other DNA sequences can be predicted by simple addition of free energy changes of single base substitutions. We isolated cro mutants by site-directed mutagenesis and studied their DNA binding to the wild-type and base-substituted mutant operators. The sequence-specific contacts derived from such studies are significantly different from the models proposed by Ohlendorf et al. [Ohlendorf, D. H., Anderson, W. F., Takeda, Y. & Matthews, B. W. (1982) Nature (London) 298, 719-723] and by Hochschild et al. [Hochschild, A., Douhan, J., III, & Ptashne, M. (1986) Cell 47, 807-816].

Interaction at a distance between lambda repressors disrupts gene activation

The lambda repressor is an activator as well as a repressor of transcription. The activation function is blocked by interaction with another lambda repressor molecule bound upstream on the same DNA molecule. This example of negative control at a distance involves formation of a DNA loop.

Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions

The crystal structure of a complex containing the DNA-binding domain of lambda repressor and a lambda operator site was determined at 2.5 A resolution and refined to a crystallographic R factor of 24.2 percent. The complex is stabilized by an extensive network of hydrogen bonds between the protein and the sugar-phosphate backbone. Several side chains form hydrogen bonds with sites in the major groove, and hydrophobic contacts also contribute to the specificity of binding. The overall arrangement of the complex is quite similar to that predicted from earlier modeling studies, which fit the protein dimer against linear B-form DNA. However, the cocrystal structure reveals important side chain-side chain interactions that were not predicted from the modeling or from previous genetic and biochemical studies.

How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work

A specific protein, bound to DNA, can activate transcription of a wide array of genes in many eukaryotes. Further analysis suggests a general outline for how eukaryotic transcriptional activators function and are controlled.

DNA binding by proteins

Study of proteins that recognize specific DNA sequences has yielded much information, but the field is still in its infancy. Already two major structural motifs have been discovered, the helix-turn-helix and zinc finger, and numerous examples of DNA-binding proteins containing either of them are known. The restriction enzyme Eco RI uses yet a different motif. Additional motifs are likely to be found as well. There is a growing understanding of some of the physical chemistry involved in protein-DNA binding, but much remains to be learned before it becomes possible to engineer a protein that binds to a specific DNA sequence.

Mapping the binding site of aflatoxin B1 in DNA: molecular modeling of the binding sites for the N(7)-guanine adduct of aflatoxin B1 in different DNA sequences

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), a potent mutagen and carcinogen, forms an adduct exclusively at the N(7) position of guanine, but the structure of this adduct in double stranded DNA is not known. Molecular modeling (using the program, PSFRODO) in conjunction with molecular mechanical calculation (using the program, AMBER) are used to assess the binding modes available to this AFB1 adduct. Two modes appear reasonable; in one the AFB1 moiety is intercalated between the base pair containing the adducted guanine and the adjacent base pair on the 5'-side in reference to the adducted guanine, while in the second it is bound externally in the major groove of DNA. Rotational flexibility appears feasible in the latter providing four, potential binding sites. Molecular modeling reveals that the binding sites around the reactive guanine in different sequences are not uniformly compatible for interaction with AFB1. As the sequence is changed, one particular external binding site would be expected to give a pattern of reactivities that is reasonably consistent with the observed sequence specificity of binding that AFB1 shows in its reaction with DNA (Benasutti, M., Ejadi, S., Whitlow, M. D. and Loechler, E. L. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 472-481). The AFB1 moiety is face-stacked in the major groove with its long axis approximately perpendicular to the helix axis. Favorable interactions are formed between exocyclic amino groups that project into the major groove on cytosines and adenines surrounding the reactive guanine, and oxygens in AFB1; unfavorable interactions involve van der Waals contacts between the methyl group on thymine and the AFB1 moiety. "Some of the sequence specificity of binding data can be rationalized more readily if it is assumed that 5'-GG-3' sequences adopt an A-DNA structure." Based upon molecular modeling/potential energy minimization calculation, it is difficult to predict how reactivity would change in different DNA sequences in the case of the intercalative binding mode; however, several arguments suggest that intercalation might not be favored. From these considerations a model of the structure for the transition state in reaction of AFB1 with DNA is proposed involving one particular external binding site.

Characterization of the binding sites of c1 repressor of bacteriophage P1. Evidence for multiple asymmetric sites

The repressor of bacteriophage P1, encoded by the c1 gene, is responsible for maintaining a P1 prophage in the lysogenic state. In this paper we present: (1) the sequence of the rightmost 943 base-pairs of the P1 genetic map that includes the 5'-terminal 224 base-pairs of the c1 gene plus its upstream region; (2) the construction of a plasmid that directs the production of approximately 5% of the cell's protein as P1 repressor; (3) a deletion analysis that establishes the startpoint of P1 repressor translation; (4) filter binding experiments that demonstrate that P1 repressor binds to several regions upstream from the c1 gene; (5) DNase I footprint experiments that directly identify two of the P1 repressor binding sites. Sequences very similar to the identified binding sites occur in at least 11 sites in P1, in most cases near functions known, or likely, to be controlled by repressor. From these sites we have derived the consensus binding site sequence ATTGCTCTAATAAATTT. We suggest that, unlike other phage operators, the P1 repressor binding sites lack rotational symmetry.

Missing contact probing of DNA-protein interactions

We have examined the positions of contact between lambda phage repressor protein and operator OR1 DNA by scanning populations of lightly depurinated or depyrimidated DNA for bases essential to or irrelevant to repressor binding. This global scanning technique delineates the apparent contact region between lambda repressor and operator and shows bases previously demonstrated or predicted to be contacted plus some additional bases. A mutant repressor, previously shown to contact DNA as wild-type repressor does with the exception of a missing contact to guanosine G4' [Hochschild, A. & Ptashne, M. (1986) Cell 44, 925-933], similarly failed to contact G4' when assayed by this method. Coupled with altering a test residue of a DNA-contacting protein to glycine or alanine so as to eliminate a specific contact, the method appears to provide an efficient means of scanning for specific residue-base contacts.

The DNA-binding domains of the jun oncoprotein and the yeast GCN4 transcriptional activator protein are functionally homologous

The jun oncoprotein, which causes sarcomas in chickens, and the DNA-binding domain of yeast GCN4, which coordinately regulates the expression of amino acid biosynthetic genes, show significant homology. In yeast cells deleted for the GCN4 gene, GCN4 function can be conferred by a hybrid protein in which the GCN4 DNA-binding domain is replaced by the homologous region of jun. Moreover, in strains containing various mutations of the GCN4 binding site in the HIS3 promoter, HIS3 expression is affected similarly by the hybrid protein and by GCN4. These results indicate that the jun oncoprotein binds the same DNA sequences as GCN4, and strongly suggest that jun is derived from a normal cellular transcription factor (possibly AP-1, which recognizes similar sequences). This provides direct evidence for the idea that alterations in the machinery for proper gene expression can lead to the oncogenic state.

Interactions between a DNA-binding transcription factor (COUP) and a non-DNA binding factor (S300-II)

We have identified previously two transcription factors, COUP (chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter) and S300-II, from HeLa cell nuclear extracts. In this paper, the purine base and the phosphate backbone contact sites for the COUP transcription factor were defined. These studies indicate that the COUP box transcription factor interacts with specific base residues in the major groove of the DNA helix. In addition, we have purified the S300-II factor over 100,000-fold. The polypeptide possessing functional transcriptional activity has been identified by SDS-PAGE followed by gel-slice elution and a renaturation assay. It is absolutely required for in vitro function of the ovalbumin promoter. In addition, S300-II stimulates transcription from the MMTV and lysozyme promoters. Kinetic studies probing the interaction of S300-II with COUP factor suggest that it may stabilize COUP-promoter complexes by slowing their rate of dissociation.

Promoter selection in human mitochondria involves binding of a transcription factor to orientation-independent upstream regulatory elements

Selective transcription of human mitochondrial DNA requires a transcription factor (mtTF) in addition to an essentially nonselective RNA polymerase. Partially purified mtTF is able to sequester promoter-containing DNA in preinitiation complexes in the absence of mitochondrial RNA polymerase, suggesting a DNA-binding mechanism for factor activity. Functional domains, required for positive transcriptional regulation by mtTF, are identified within both major promoters of human mtDNA through transcription of mutant promoter templates in a reconstituted in vitro system. These domains are essentially coextensive with DNA sequences protected from nuclease digestion by mtTF-binding. Comparison of the sequences of the two mtTF-responsive elements reveals significant homology only when one sequence is inverted; the binding sites are in opposite orientations with respect to the predominant direction of transcription. Thus mtTF may function bidirectionally, requiring additional protein-DNA interactions to dictate transcriptional polarity. The mtTF-responsive elements are arrayed as direct repeats, separated by approximately 80 bp within the displacement-loop region of human mitochondrial DNA; this arrangement may reflect duplication of an ancestral bidirectional promoter, giving rise to separate, unidirectional promoters for each strand.

A new-specificity mutant of 434 repressor that defines an amino acid-base pair contact

The repressor encoded by bacteriophage 434 binds to its operators by inserting a 'recognition' alpha-helix into the major groove of the DNA. We have identified an amino acid-base pair contact that determines (in part) the DNA-binding specificity of 434 repressor. The identification is based on the properties of a 'new-specificity' mutant, named Repressor [Ala 28], which bears the substitution of Ala for Gln at the first residue of its recognition alpha-helix. Repressor [Ala 28] binds with high affinity to a particular doubly mutant operator bearing the same substitution at position 1 in each half-site, but does not bind to either the wild-type operator or to other mutant operators. We describe molecular models of residue 28-base pair 1 interactions that account for the binding specificities of both the mutant and wild-type proteins.

T4 endonuclease V promotes the formation of multimeric DNA structures

Electron microscopy of UV-irradiated circular DNA molecules which had been treated with T4 endonuclease V revealed the formation of multimeric DNA structures in addition to the expected conversion of the superhelical DNA molecules into nicked circular and linear forms. The multimeric DNA molecules could be distinguished in electron micrographs from catenated molecules which were present in the original DNA preparation by a combination of rotary and single angle heavy metal shadowing. The complexity and frequency of these structures increased with time of reaction with endonuclease V. Their formation, as well as the endonuclease activity of enzyme, was dependent on UV irradiation of the DNA, and the complexes could be disrupted by prior phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. Preparations of endonuclease V estimated to be 98% pure by mass promoted the same complex formation between DNA molecules as did preparations estimated to be only 5-10% pure. In addition to these intermolecular structures, the formation of complexes between regions on the same DNA molecules was manifest as discrete double-stranded 'loops' 200-300 base pairs in length. DNA 'bubble structures' were also observed and may represent folding of the 'loops' onto adjacent segments of DNA. These results suggest that at least one active form of T4 endonuclease V may be a multimeric complex of enzyme molecules in association with DNA.

How lambda repressor and lambda Cro distinguish between OR1 and OR3

Although lambda repressor and lambda Cro bind to the same six operators on the phage chromosome, the fine specificities of the two proteins differ: repressor binds more tightly to OR1 than to OR3, and vice versa for Cro. In this paper, we change base pairs in the operators and amino acids in the proteins to analyze the basis for these preferences. We find that these preferences are determined by residues 5 and 6 of the recognition helices of the two proteins and by the amino-terminal arm, in the case of repressor. We also find that the most important base pairs in the operator which enable repressor and Cro to discriminate between OR1 and OR3 are position 3 (for Cro) and positions 5 and 8 (for repressor). These and previous results show how repressor and Cro recognize and distinguish between two related operator sequences.