Upregulated expression of the genes encoding translation initiation factors eIF-4E and eIF-2alpha in transformed cells

PKR, apoptosis and cancer

The double-stranded (ds) RNA-regulated serine/threonine protein kinase, PKR, is an interferon-inducible enzyme of widespread occurrence in mammalian cells. PKR is activated by dsRNA via a mechanism involving autophosphorylation. Once activated, the enzyme phosphorylates the alpha-subunit of protein synthesis initiation factor eIF2, thereby inhibiting translation. Accumulating data suggest that PKR has additional substrates, and that the kinase may also regulate gene transcription and signal transduction pathways. Although PKR plays an important role in mediating the antiviral effects of interferons, PKR is also implicated in regulating cell proliferation in uninfected cells and may have a tumor suppressor function under normal conditions. Studies of human malignancies and tumor cell lines suggest that, in general, patients bearing tumors with a higher PKR content have a more favorable prognosis. However, in human breast carcinoma cells, dysregulation of PKR may be associated with the establishment or maintenance of the transformed state.

Abnormal levels and minimal activity of the dsRNA-activated protein kinase, PKR, in breast carcinoma cells

The interferon induced, dsRNA-activated, protein kinase, PKR, is a key regulator of translational initiation, playing an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis and transformation. PKR levels correlate inversely with proliferative activity in several human tumor systems. This inverse relationship breaks down in human invasive ductal breast carcinomas which exhibit high levels of PKR (Haines et al., Tumor Biol. 17 (1996) 5-12). Consistent with the data from human tumors, the levels of PKR in several breast carcinoma cell lines, MCF7, T47D, BT20, MDAMB231 and MDAMB468, are paradoxically high compared to those found in the normal breast cell lines MCF10A and Hs578Bst. The activity of affinity- or immuno-purified PKR from MCF7, T47D, and BT20 cells appears to be severely attenuated, as judged by its ability to autophosphorylate, or phosphorylate eIF2 alpha. Furthermore, the activity of the kinase from breast carcinoma cells is refractory to stimulation by dsRNA or heparin. However, PKR from breast carcinoma cells remains functional with respect to its ability to bind dsRNA. The activity of PKR from MCF10A cells is reduced by prior incubation with extracts from MCF7 cells, suggesting that MCF7 extracts contain a transdominant inhibitor of PKR. Deregulation of PKR may therefore provide a mechanism for the development or maintenance of a transformed phenotype of human breast carcinomas, mimicking the effects of manipulation of PKR or eIF2 activity observed in experimental systems. Thus, breast carcinomas may provide the first indication of a role for PKR in the pathogenesis of a naturally occurring human cancer.

Translational control: the cancer connection

There is now a growing body of evidence which suggests links between the regulation of protein synthesis and the disruption of cell behaviour that typifies cancer. This directed issue of the International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology presents several review articles of relevance to this field. The topics covered include the significance of the regulation and overexpression of polypeptide chain initiation factors for cell transformation and malignancy, the role of mRNA structure in the control of synthesis of key growth regulatory proteins, the actions of the eIF2 alpha-specific protein kinase PKR in the control cell growth and apoptosis, and the involvement of the elongation factor eEF1 in oncogenesis. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the field and to indicate where we may expect developments to occur in the next few years.

Novel regulatory factors interacting with the promoter of the gene encoding the mRNA cap binding protein (eIF4E) and their function in growth regulation

Regulation of the mRNA cap binding protein (eIF4E) is critical to the control of cellular proliferation since this protein is the rate-limiting factor in translation initiation and transforms fibroblasts and since eIF4E mutants arrest budding yeast in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (cdc33). We previously demonstrated regulation of eIF4E by altered transcription of its mRNA in serum-stimulated fibroblasts and in response to c-myc. To identify additional factors regulating eIF4E transcription, we used linker-scanning constructs to characterize sites in the promoter of the eIF4E gene required for its expression. Promoter activity was dependent on sites at -5, -25, -45, and -75; the site at -75 included a previously described myc box. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays identified DNA-protein interactions at -25 and revealed a binding site (TTACCCCCCCTT) that is unique to the eIF4E promoter. Proteins of 68 and 97 kDa bound this site in UV cross-linking and Southwestern experiments. Levels of 4E regulatory factor activities correlated with c-Myc levels, eIF4E expression levels, and protein synthesis in differentiating U937 and HL60 cells, suggesting that these activities may function to regulate protein synthesis rates during differentiation. Since the eIF4E promoter lacked typical TATA and initiator elements, further studies of this novel initiator-homologous element should provide insights into mechanisms of transcription initiation and growth regulation.