The reality of radical sphincter preservation surgery for cancer of the distal 3 cm of rectum following high-dose radiation

Endocavitary irradiation for early rectal carcinomas T1 (T2). A series of 101 patients treated with the Papillon's technique

PURPOSE

This work is a retrospective analysis of a series of patients treated with endocavitary irradiation stressing the role of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), which has been used routinely in the staging since 1987.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1977 and 1993, 101 patients with infiltrating adenocarcinomas were treated. Clinical staging was 65 T1 N0 and 36 T2 N0. TRUS used in 36 patients showed: 22 UT1 N0, 10 UT2 N0, and 3 UT2 N1. Contact x-ray was delivered with a 50 kV radiotherapy unit. The median dose was 92 Gy (60-125) in five fractions, 55 days. In 28 patients a boost was given with 192Ir implant delivering a median dose of 25 Gy/21 h.

RESULTS

Complete response was observed in all patients at the completion of treatment. Loco-regional failures were seen in 14 patients (local in 7 patients, nodal pararectal in 6 patients, and local + nodal in 1 patient). A curative salvage treatment was attempted in 13 patients and resulted in an ultimate pelvic control rate of 99 patients. Rectal preservation was possible in 92 patients. Overall and specific 5-year survival was 83.3% and 94.4%. No serious complication was observed. TRUS was more sensitive than digital rectal examination to detect involvement of pararectal metastatic nodes (N1). No loco- regional relapse was observed out of 22 UT1 N0.

CONCLUSION

Endocavitary irradiation can cure early adenocarcinoma of the rectum without complication. TRUS appears as a significant improvement in the selection of patients amenable to this treatment. If restricted to UT1 N0 tumors, endocavitary irradiation should control locally more than 90% of these patients. Any UN1 is a contraindication for endocavitary irradiation alone.

Combined curative radiation therapy alone in (T1) T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study of 29 patients

AIM

Analysis of a pilot study including 29 consecutive patients with high surgical risk or refusal of colostomy treated with radiation therapy alone with curative intent.

PATIENTS

Between 1986 and 1992, 29 patients were treated for infiltrating adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Median age was 72 years. Transrectal ultrasound staging was used in 24 patients (T1, 2; T2, 14; T3, 13; N0, 23; N1, 6). In 20 patients the lower border of the tumor was at 5 cm or less from the anal verge and in 19 patients the diameter exceeded 3 cm. CEA was elevated in seven cases.

TREATMENT

Contact X-ray (50 kV) was given first (70 Gy/3 fractions). External beam radiation therapy used a three-field technique in the prone position. Accelerated schedule (39 Gy/13 fractions/17 days) with a concomitant boost "field within the field' (4 Gy/4 fractions). Six weeks later an iridium-192 implant was performed in 21 (20 Gy/22 h).

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 46 months. Overall and specific survival at 5 years was 68% (SE = 0.09) and 76% (SE = 0.08). Local control was obtained in 21/29 patients (72%). There was one grade 2 rectal bleeding and five grade 2 rectal necroses. The overall tolerance was good in these frail patients.

DISCUSSION

For T2. T3 or T1 > 3 cm diameter rectal adenocarcinoma, where contact X-ray alone is not recommended, a combined treatment with radiation therapy alone is able to give good local control with acceptable toxicity. This treatment should be restricted to inoperable patients.

Radical and local excisional methods of sphincter-sparing surgery after high-dose radiation for cancer of the distal 3 cm of the rectum

BACKGROUND

Despite conventional attitudes that interdict sphincter-preservation surgery (SPS) for cancers arising in the terminal 3 cm of rectum, we have selectively employed high-dose preoperative external radiation (HDPER) and either radical or local excisional SPS techniques for rectal cancer arising between the 0.5 and 3 cm levels above the anorectal ring. We have reported a preliminary experience with HDPER and full-thickness local excision (FTLE) and three different methods of radical SPS. We now describe our experience with a single method of radical excision, transanal abdominal transanal proctosigmoidectomy with coloanal anastomosis (TATA) and FTLE in conjunction with HDPER for cancers of the distal 3 cm of rectum based on specific guidelines.

METHODS

Since 1984, 109 patients with cancers at or below the 3 cm level have been treated with HDPER in doses of 4,500-7,000 cGy and a sphincter-preserving radical or local excision method in a prospective rectal cancer management program. Sixty-five patients (group A) underwent transanal abdominal transanal radical proctosigmoidectomy with colonal anastomosis (TATA) and 44 patients (group B) underwent FTLE.

RESULTS

There was one death (1%). Mean follow-up was 40 months. Local recurrence rates for groups A and B were 9 and 14%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier 5-year actuarial survival was 85 and 90% for groups A and B, respectively, and 87% collectively.

CONCLUSION

Experience with 109 patients with cancers of the distal 3 cm of rectum indicates that SPS can be accomplished by either radical or local excisional methods with acceptable local control and survival if HDPER and strict selection guidelines are employed.

Sphincter preservation with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis

PURPOSE

To determine if preoperative radiation therapy allows sphincter preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients with the diagnosis of invasive, resectable, primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis were enrolled on a Phase I/II trial of preoperative radiation therapy plus low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. By preoperative assessment, all patients had invasive tumors (2: T2 28:T3) involving the distal half of the rectum and required an abdominoperineal resection. The median tumor size was 4 cm (range: 1.5-6 cm) and the median distance from the anal verge was 4 cm (range: 3-7 cm). The whole pelvis received 46.8 Gy followed by a 3.60 Gy boost to the primary tumor bed. The median follow-up was 43 months (range: 6-82 months).

RESULTS

Of the 29 patients who underwent resection, 3 (10%) had a complete pathologic response and 24 (83%) were able to successfully undergo a low anterior resection/colonanal anastomosis. The incidence of local failure was crude: 17% and 4-year actuarial: 23%. The 4-year actuarial survival was 75%. One patient developed a partial disruption of the anastomosis and two developed rectal stenosis. Analysis of sphincter function using a previously published scale was performed at the time of last follow-up in 22 of the 24 patients who underwent a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. Function was good or excellent in 77%. The median number of bowel movements/day was two (range: 1-6).

CONCLUSIONS

This technique may be an alternative to an abdominoperineal resection in selected patients. Continued follow-up is needed to determine if this approach ultimately has similar local control and survival rates as an abdominoperineal resection.

Conservative surgery for low rectal carcinoma after high-dose radiation. Functional and oncologic results

OBJECTIVE

Using a prospective, nonrandomized study, the authors evaluated the morbidity and functional and oncologic results of conservative surgery for cancer of the lower third of the rectum after high-dose radiation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Colo-anal anastomosis has made sphincter conservation for low rectal carcinoma technically feasible. The limits to conservative surgery currently are oncologic rather than technical. Adjuvant radiotherapy has proven its benefit in terms of regional control, with a dose relationship.

METHODS

Since June 1990, 27 patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma were treated by preoperative radiotherapy (40 + 20 Gy delivered with three fields) and curative surgery. The mean distance from the anal verge was 47 mm (27-57 mm), and none of the tumors were fixed (15 T2, 12 T3).

RESULTS

Mortality and morbidity were not increased by high-dose preoperative radiation. Twenty-one patients underwent conservative surgery (78%-17 total proctectomies and colo-anal anastomoses, 4 trans-anal resections). After colo-anal anastomosis, all patients with colonic pouch had good results; two patients had moderate results and one patient had poor results after straight colo-anal anastomosis. With a mean follow-up of 24 months, the authors noted 1 postoperative death, 2 disease-linked deaths, 1 controlled regional recurrence, 2 evolutive patients with pulmonary metastases, and 21 disease-free patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These first results confirm the possibility of conservative surgery for low rectal carcinoma after high-dose radiation. A prospective, randomized trial could be induced to determine the real role of the 20 Gy boost on the sphincter-saving decision.