Prostate-specific antigen and radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

Is there a subset of patients with PSA > or = 20 ng/ml who do well after conformal beam radiotherapy?

To determine if there is a subgroup of patients with pretreatment PSA > or = 20 ng/ml with a favorable outcome after external beam radiation therapy. We analyzed retrospectively treatment outcomes of 129 patients with pretreatment PSA > or = 20 ng/ml treated in our department from 2/88-8/94. Median patient age was 70 years (range 51-89 years). Tumor stage was T1/T2ab in 68, T2c/T3 in 61 patients. Initial Gleason grade was < 7 in 82 and > or = 7 in 47 patients. Median PSA was 35 ng/ml (mean 45 ng/ml, range 20-191 ng/ml). Ninety-seven patients received four-field conformal external beam radiation therapy. No patient received surgery or hormonal therapy prior to treatment. Median central axis dose was 73 Gy (range 68-79 Gy). Covariates considered in univariate and multivariate analyses included central axis dose, pretreatment PSA, presence of perineural invasion, Gleason score, palpable tumor stage and patient age. bNED failure was defined as a PSA > or = 1.5 and rising on two consecutive determinations. Median follow up was 50 months (range 3-100 months). Overall bNED control for the entire patient population was 22% at five years. Of the covariates analyzed, dose (P < 0.01), stage (P < 0.01), Gleason Score (P < 0.01), and the presence of PNI (P = 0.01) were significant on multivariate analysis. Based on these results, patients could be stratified into two distinct groups. Group I consisted of 19 patients with favorable features including T1/T2ab disease, Gleason Score 2-6, no perineural invasion treated to a dose > 73 Gy to the central axis. Patients in Group II had at least one of the above poor prognostic features or were treated to central axis doses < 73 Gy. The bNED control was significantly higher for patients in Group I than those in Group II (58% vs. 23%, P = 0.0027). There appears to be a favorable subgroup of patients with PSA > or = 20 ng/ml where treating to doses over 73 Gy to the central axis is warranted (four-year bNED rate of 58%). However, because of the small patient numbers, these results will need to be validated with longer follow up.

Failure-free survival following brachytherapy alone or external beam irradiation alone for T1-2 prostate tumors in 2222 patients: results from a single practice

PURPOSE

To evaluate failure-free survival (FFS) for brachytherapy (BT) alone compared to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone for Stage T1-2 Nx-No Mo patients over the same time period by a single community-based practice in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The database of Arizona Oncology Services (a multiphysician radiation oncology practice in the Phoenix metropolitan area) was reviewed for patients meeting the following criteria: (1) T1 or T2 Nx-No Mo prostate cancer; (2) no prior or concurrent therapy including hormones; (3) treatment period 12/88-12/95; and (4) treatment with either EBRT alone or BT alone ((125)I or (103)Pd). This yielded 1527 EBRT and 695 BT patients; no patients meeting the above criteria were excluded from analysis. Median follow-up for EBRT patients was 41.3 months and, for BT patients, 51.3 months. Patients were not randomized to either therapy but rather received EBRT or BT based upon patient, treating, and/or referring physician preference. PSA failure was defined according to the ASTRO consensus guidelines. The median patient age was 74 years for both groups.

RESULTS

Failure-free survival at 5 years for EBRT and BT are 69% and 71%, respectively (p = 0.91). For T stage, no significant difference in FFS at 5 years is observed between EBRT and BT for either T1 (78% vs. 83%, p = 0.47) or T2 (67% vs. 67%, p = 0.89) tumors. Analysis by Gleason score shows superior outcomes for Gleason 8-10 lesions treated with EBRT vs. BT (5-year FFS 52% vs. 28%, p = 0.04); outcomes for lower grade lesions (Gleason 4-6) when analyzed by Gleason score alone do not significantly differ according to treatment received. Patients with initial PSA values of 10-20 ng/dL have an improved FFS with EBRT vs. BT at 5 years (70% vs. 53%, p = 0.001); outcomes for patients with initial PSA ranges of 0-4 ng/dL, of > 4-10 ng/dL, and > 20 ng/dL did not differ significantly by treatment received. FFS was also determined for presenting Gleason score/PSA combinations; all Gleason combinations in the initial PSA range >10-20 ng/dL had superior outcomes with EBRT compared to BT, and this reached statistical significance for Gleason scores of 2-4 (72% vs. 58%, p = 0.026), Gleason 7 (67% vs. 28%, p = 0.002), and Gleason 8-10 (63% vs. 23%, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our patient population, either EBRT or BT appear equally efficacious for patients with T1/T2 disease with Gleason scores </= 6 or PSA </= 10 ng/dL. Patients with presenting Gleason scores of 8-10 or PSA > 10 ng/dL (but </= 20 ng/dL) appear to fare significantly worse with BT alone compared to EBRT alone. Neither EBRT nor BT alone was particularly effective for patients with a presenting PSA > 20 ng/dL, as would be anticipated from the significant risks of occult distant metastasis in this group. To our knowledge, this is the first report comparing the outcome of EBRT and BT treatment in patients treated concurrently by a single group, and these results, achieved in a community-based practice, compare favorably to data from academic centers regarding external beam, brachytherapy, or surgical outcomes and should be generalizable to the community at large.

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone.

RESULTS

EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.

The correlation of serial prostate specific antigen measurements with clinical outcome after external beam radiation therapy of patients for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The authors analyzed retrospectively their institution's experience in treating patients with localized prostate carcinoma with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to determine the correlation of various biochemical failure (BF) definitions with clinical failure and cause specific survival (CSS).

METHODS

Between January 1987 and December 1997, 1,094 patients with clinical T1-T3N0M0 prostate carcinoma were treated with definitive EBRT alone at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. All patients received EBRT alone (no adjuvant hormones) to a median total prostate dose of 66.6 grays (Gy) (range, 59.4-70.4 Gy). Multiple BF definitions were tested for their correlation with clinical failure and cause specific death (CSD = 1-CSS). All BF definitions were tested for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of predicting subsequent clinical failure and CSD. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated in the form of 10-year actuarial clinical failure and CSD rates. Analyses were performed on all 1,094 patients as well as for those 727 patients who had at least 5 post-RT prostate specific antigen (PSA) level measurements and who did not receive hormonal therapy for post-RT PSA elevations. The median PSA follow-up was 4.0 years for the entire population and 4.5 years for those 727 patients included in the second analysis.

RESULTS

In the entire population, 167 patients (15%) experienced clinical failure corresponding to 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of 16% and 34%, respectively. The correlation of various BF definitions with outcome was calculated in those 727 patients who did not receive hormonal therapy. For these patients, BF (as defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel) yielded a 73% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and 75% overall accuracy for predicting clinical failure and a 74% sensitivity, 69% specificity, and 69% overall accuracy for predicting CSD. The 10-year clinical failure rate for those 251 patients demonstrating 3 consecutive PSA rises (BF) was 64% versus 14% for those patients who did not meet these criteria (biochemically controlled [BC]). As expected, definitions requiring only two rises were more sensitive but less specific in predicting clinical failure than those definitions requiring three or four rises. Because there were dramatically more clinically controlled patients (85%) than clinical failures (15%), the overall accuracy for each definition more closely approximated its specificity. The definitions classifying BF as a postnadir increase of > or = 3 or > or = 4 ng/mL above the nadir yielded the highest accuracies of 87% and 88%, respectively. In addition, these definitions also appeared to provide the greatest separation in clinical failure rates between BC and BF patients, an absolute difference of 77% and 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between BF and clinical failure and CSD varies markedly depending on the BF definition used. Definitions incorporating a fixed baseline (the nadir level) and the postnadir PSA profile may have better correlation with clinical failure than definitions using the nadir only or a specific number of consecutive rises in which a variable baseline "resets" after a PSA decrease.

Comparison of biochemical disease-free survival of patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate undergoing radical prostatectomy, transperineal ultrasound-guided radioactive seed implantation, or definitive external beam irradiation

PURPOSE

This retrospective study compares the long-term biochemical disease-free survival for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, transperineal ultrasound-guided (125)Iodine implantation, or external beam irradiation alone in a tertiary referral community-based hospital.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five hundred forty patients were available for evaluation, which included: external beam, 132; (125)I, 186; and radical prostatectomy, 222. For the 318 patients referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology, those with T3 disease underwent external beam irradiation while patients with T1 or T2 underwent (125) 0.2 ng/mL or if they had three consecutive increases in their PSA or an increase in their postoperative PSA warranting intervention with androgen ablation or external beam irradiation to the pelvis.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified by pretreatment risk groups predicting for post-treatment PSA recurrence. Patients were considered to be at a low or intermediate risk for recurrence if their clinical stage was T1c, T2a, T2b, pretreatment PSA level was </= 20 or their biopsy. Gleason score was </= 6, Patients were considered to be at high risk for failure if they were clinically stage T2c, T3, PSA at diagnosis > 20, or Gleason score was >/= 7. For 132 patients undergoing external beam irradiation, 28 of 37 low or intermediate risk obtained a 1 year nadir PSA of < 1 (76%) while 40% of high risk patients obtained nadir < 1. Of 186 patients undergoing (125)I, 112 of 147 low or intermediate risk (76%) obtained a nadir PSA < 1. Twenty of 39 (51%) high risk obtained a nadir PSA < 1. Of the 222 patients undergoing prostatectomy, 83 of 88 (94%) low or intermediate risk had undetectable levels of PSA at 1 year. One hundred seventeen of 134 (86%) were high risk and had undetectable levels of PSA at 1 year. The biochemical disease-free survival for patients with low or intermediate risk at 5 years is approximately 70% with no significant difference between those patients treated with radical prostatectomy, external beam, or (125)I. For those patients with high risk factors for recurrence, there is no significant difference between ultrasound-guided implant or external beam, but there is a significant improvement in biochemical disease-free survival with radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

For patients with low or intermediate risk disease, external beam, ultrasound-guided (125)I, or a radical prostatectomy give comparable long-term biochemical disease-free survival. For patients with high risk disease, a radical prostatectomy provides a significantly improved biochemical disease-free survival. Our current protocols utilize androgen ablation in combination with conformal three-dimensional external beam irradiation or androgen ablation in conjunction with external beam irradiation and (103)Pd seed implantation for patients at high risk for extra capsular disease. It is too early to determine if this combination therapy will give results comparable to radical prostatectomy. For patients who obtain a 1 year nadir PSA of < 1, the biochemical disease-free survival is durable with little risk of subsequent recurrence.

Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in predicting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) for men with PSA-detected or clinically palpable prostate cancer.

METHODS

A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether the percentage of positive prostate biopsies provided clinically relevant information about PSA outcome after RP in 960 men while accounting for the previously established risk groups that are defined according to pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and the 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical T stage. The findings were then tested using an independent surgical database that included data for 823 men.

RESULTS

Controlling for the known prognostic factors, the percentage of positive prostate biopsies added clinically significant information (P <.0001) regarding time to PSA failure after RP. Specifically, 80% of the patients in the intermediate-risk group (1992 AJCC T2b, or biopsy Gleason 7 or PSA > 10 ng/mL and </= 20 ng/mL) could be classified into either an 11% or 86% 4-year PSA control cohort using the preoperative prostate biopsy data. These findings were validated in the intermediate-risk patients using an independent surgical data set.

CONCLUSION

The validated stratification of PSA outcome after RP using the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in intermediate-risk patients is clinically significant. This information can be used to identify men with newly diagnosed and clinically localized prostate cancer who are at high risk for early (</= 2 years) PSA failure and, therefore, may benefit from the use of adjuvant therapy.

Prognostic role of serum prostatic acid phosphatase for 103Pd-based radiation for prostatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

To establish the prognostic role of serum enzymatic prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) in patients treated with palladium (103Pd) and supplemental external beam irradiation (EBRT) for clinically localized, high-risk prostate carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with Stage T2a-T3 prostatic carcinoma were treated from 1992 through 1995. Each patient had at least one of the following risk factors for extracapsular disease extension: Stage T2b or greater (100 patients), Gleason score 7-10 (40 patients), pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) >15 ng/ml (32 patients), or elevated serum PAP (25 patients). Patients received 41 Gy conformal EBRT to a limited pelvic field, followed 4 weeks later by a 103Pd boost (prescription dose 80 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as a PSA greater than 1 ng/ml (normal <4 ng/ml).

RESULTS

The overall, actuarial freedom from biochemical failure at 4 years after treatment was 79%. In Cox-proportional hazard multivariate analysis, the strongest predictor of failure was elevated pretreatment acid phosphatase (p = 0.02), followed by Gleason score (p = 0.1), and PSA (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

PAP was the strongest predictor of long-term biochemical failure. It may be a more accurate indicator of micrometastatic disease than PSA, and as such, we suggest that it be reconsidered for general use in radiation-treated patients.

Defining biochemical cure for prostate carcinoma patients treated with external beam radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The authors retrospectively reviewed their institution's long term experience with conventional external beam radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate carcinoma to identify criteria associated with long term biochemical cure.

METHODS

Between January 1987 and December 1994, 871 patients were treated with external beam RT alone for clinically localized prostate carcinoma at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. All patients received only external beam RT to a median total dose of 66.6 grays (Gy) (range, 59.4-70.4 Gy). No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 0. 2-11.8 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

In the entire study group, 380 patients experienced biochemical failure at a median interval of 1.5 years after the completion of RT. The 5-year and 7-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were 50% and 48%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, higher Gleason score, higher clinical T classification, higher nadir level, and shorter time interval to nadir all were associated significantly with biochemical failure (P < 0.001). The median intervals to biochemical failure for patients with pretreatment PSA levels </= 3.9 ng/mL, 4.0-19.9 ng/mL, and >/= 20.0 ng/mL were 2.2 years, 1.5 years, and 1.2 years, respectively (P < 0. 001). The median intervals to biochemical failure for patients with Gleason scores of 2-4, 5-7, and 8-10 were 1.8 years, 1.5 years, and 1.1 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Only 6 patients failed beyond 5 years after treatment even though 136 patients were at risk for failure beyond this point. When restricting analysis to 643 patients (74%) with >/= 3 years of PSA follow-up, the median nadir level for biochemically controlled patients was 0.6 ng/mL and occurred at a median interval of 1.9 years after RT versus a median nadir level of 1.3 ng/mL (P = 0.002) occurring at a median interval of 1.0 years (P < 0.001) in those patients who experienced biochemical failure. Patients were divided into subgroups based on their PSA nadir level and time to nadir. The 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for patients with nadir values of </= 0.4 ng/mL, 0.5-0.9 ng/mL, 1. 0-1.9 ng/mL, 2.0-3.9 ng/mL, and >/= 4.0 ng/mL were 78%, 60%, 50%, 20%, and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for patients who reached their nadir at < 1.0 years, 1.0-1.9 years, 2.0-2.9 years, and >/= 3.0 years were 30%, 52%, 64%, and 92%, respectively (P < 0.001). All 52 patients who achieved a nadir of </= 0.4 ng/mL and required >/= 2.0 years to reach this nadir had biochemically controlled disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that a patient has a high likelihood of biochemical cure after treatment for prostate carcinoma with conventional doses of external beam RT if he has not demonstrated biochemical failure within 5 years of treatment. Patients with lower pretreatment PSA levels and lower Gleason scores may require longer follow-up than those with less favorable characteristics to achieve the same certainty of cure. Patients who achieve a PSA nadir </= 0.4 ng/mL and require >/= 2.0 years to reach this nadir have the highest probability of cure.

The importance of adequate follow-up in defining treatment success after external beam irradiation for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with localized prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy (RT) to determine how differences in the length of follow-up affect the determination of treatment outcome using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus Panel Definition of biochemical failure (BF).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 1987 through December 1997, 1109 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with definitive external beam RT at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. All patients received external beam RT to a median total prostate dose of 66.6 Gy (range: 59.4-70.4 Gy). A total of 1096 patients (99%) had sufficient prostate-specific antigen (PSA) follow-up to determine their biochemical status. To test the impact of differences in follow-up on the calculation of BF, 389 patients with at least 5 years of PSA follow-up were selected as the reference group for the initial analysis. BF was then retrospectively determined using the Consensus Panel definition at yearly intervals, ignoring the remainder of each patient's follow-up. The median follow-up for this group of patients was 6.6 years (range: 5.0-11.6 years). In a second analysis, patient cohorts were randomly selected with varying median PSA follow-up intervals in order to more accurately represent a population whose follow-up is distributed continuously over a defined range. Seven cohorts were randomly selected with 200 patients in each cohort. Cohorts were individually identified such that half of the patients (100) had 2 years or less follow-up than the stated time point for analysis and half (100) had up to 2 years more follow-up than the time point chosen for analysis. For example, in the cohort with a median follow-up of 3 years, 100 patients with a PSA follow-up from 1 to 3 years were randomly selected, and 100 patients with a follow-up from 3 to 5 years were randomly selected, thus generating a median follow-up of 3 years for this cohort (range: 1 to 5 years). This process was repeated five times for five random samples of seven cohorts each. Biochemical failure was calculated according to the Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

In the first analysis, significantly different rates of biochemical control (varying by 6-21%) were calculated for the same actuarial year chosen for analysis depending only upon the length of follow-up used. For example, the 3-year actuarial rate of biochemical control (BC) varied from 71% when calculated with 3 years of follow-up versus 50.4% with 7 years (p < 0.01). These differences in actuarial rates of BC were observed in all subsets of patients analyzed (e.g., PSA < 10, Gleason < or = 6, n = 132,p < 0.001; PSA < 10, Gleason > or = 7, n = 33, p = 0.03; PSA > or = 10, Gleason < or = 6, n = 109, p < 0.001; and PSA > or = 10, Gleason > or = 7, n = 72, p = 0.002). The absolute magnitude of the difference in actuarial rates of BC was greatest during years 2 (range 18-30%), 3 (range 16-25%), and 4 (range 15-24%) after treatment. In the second analysis using median PSA follow-ups (as defined above), statistically significant differences in actuarial rates of BC were again observed. For example, the 3-year actuarial rate of BC varied from 74.8% with a median follow-up of 2 years versus 49.2% with a median follow-up of 6 years. These dramatic differences in BC were still observed beyond 5 years.

CONCLUSION

When the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of BF is used to calculate treatment success with external beam RT for prostate cancer, adequate follow-up is critical. Depending upon the length of time after treatment, significantly different rates of BC (varying by 15% to 30%) can be calculated for the same time interval chosen for analysis. These results suggest that data should only be reported if the length of follow-up extends at least beyond the time point at which actuarial results are examined for the majority of patients.

Curative external beam radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: results in 231 patients treated in Lyon

BACKGROUND

Radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are the mainstays of treatment of prostate cancer with curative intent. The possible development of radiation proctitis and rectal bleeding are major concerns when using EBRT. Recently, conformal radiotherapy has been introduced in an attempt to improve the results of EBRT. This paper presents an overview of the Lyon experience using standard EBRT with doses of 68 Gy, and reports the preliminary results of a study of conformal radiotherapy with dose escalation.

METHODS

From 1981 to 1995, EBRT was used to treat 231 patients with localized adenocarcinomas of the prostate. The dose of EBRT was 68 Gy/34 fractions/7 weeks using a four-field box technique with 18-MeV photons. A feasibility study of conformal radiotherapy was commenced in 1996. To date, 145 patients have been treated with doses escalating from 68 to 80 Gy.

RESULTS

In the EBRT group of 231 patients, the 5-year overall survival was 80.3%. Anorectal function was scored as excellent in 90% of patients. Rectal bleeding was seen in 14.3% of patients and required local treatment in only seven. In the group treated with conformal radiotherapy, the preliminary results indicate good early tolerance.

CONCLUSION

The curative treatment of patients with prostate cancer using EBRT gives good long-term survival with low rectal toxicity. Conformal radiotherapy appears to be an interesting approach to improve local control and perhaps survival.

The durability of external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: can it be identified?

PURPOSE

We establish criteria to identify a durable response to external beam radiation therapy by calculation of biochemical progression-free probability for patients who attained and maintained defined nadir prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels more than 5 years after treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 460 patients were treated with external beam radiation monotherapy from 1976 to 1995. Patients with PSA less than 0.5 (group 1) or 0.5 to 1.0 (group 2) ng./ml. more than 5 years after treatment were identified. Treatment failure was defined as 3 consecutive increases in PSA after nadir. Progression-free probability after 60 months was calculated for each group. A comparison was also made to patients achieving the same nadir levels anytime after treatment.

RESULTS

Failure occurred at 133 months in 1 of 26 group 1 patients (4%) and at a median of 76 months in 5 of 26 group 2 patients (19%). At 10 years progression-free probability was 91% for group 1 compared to 72% for group 2 (p = 0.0575). These same nadir levels anytime after treatment were associated with higher failure rates of 55% for group 1 and 72% for group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

If a PSA nadir of less than 0.5 ng./ml. was maintained 5 years after therapy, subsequent failure was rare. Although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.0575), a higher failure rate was noted if the nadir PSA was 0.5 to 1.0 ng./ml. at 5 years. Thus, patients with PSA 0.5 to 1.0 ng./ml. require careful continued surveillance. Nadir levels less than 1.0 ng./ml. anytime before 5 years were associated with a substantial risk of subsequent progression.

Patient selection for salvage cryotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Our objective was to identify clinical pretreatment factors associated with early treatment failure after salvage cryotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992 and 1995, 145 patients underwent salvage cryotherapy for locally recurrent adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Treatment failure was defined as an increasing postcryotherapy serial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of more than or equal to 2 ng/mL above the postcryotherapy nadir or as a positive posttreatment biopsy. We evaluated the following factors as predictors of treatment failure: tumor stage and grade at initial diagnosis, type of prior therapy, stage and grade of locally recurrent tumor, number of positive biopsy cores at recurrence, and precryotherapy PSA level.

RESULTS

Among patients with a prior history of radiation therapy only, the 2-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 74% for patients with a precryotherapy PSA less than 10 ng/mL and 28% for patients with a precryotherapy PSA more than 10 ng/mL, P <.00001. The DFS rates were 58% for patients with a Gleason score of less than or equal to 8 recurrence and 29% for patients with a Gleason score greater than or equal to 9 recurrence, P <.004. Among patients with a precryotherapy PSA less than 10 ng/mL, DFS rates were 74% for patients with a prior history of radiation therapy only and 19% for patients with a history of prior hormonal therapy plus radiation therapy, P <.002.

CONCLUSION

Patients failing initial radiation therapy with a PSA more than 10 ng/mL and Gleason score of the recurrent cancer more than or equal to 9 are unlikely to be successfully salvaged. Patients failing initial hormonal therapy and radiation therapy are less likely to be successfully salvaged than patients failing radiation therapy only.

Transrectal ultrasound-guided intraprostatic injection of absolute ethanol with and without carmustine: a feasibility study in the canine model

OBJECTIVES

To develop a reliable intraprostatic injection technique and to define the local and systemic toxicity of intraprostatic injection of dehydrated ethanol with and without carmustine.

METHODS

Twenty-three random-source male canines were divided into a control group (n = 3), a dehydrated ethanol-alone group (group 1, n = 10), and a dehydrated ethanol-plus-carmustine group (group 2, n = 10). A reliable intraprostatic injection technique was developed with the control animals. The optimal volume of dehydrated ethanol for intraprostatic injection and the local tissue effects of dehydrated ethanol injection were defined with group 1. The local tissue effects of escalating doses of carmustine were defined with group 2. All animals were injected under general anesthesia using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. Fourteen days after injection, a repeated TRUS of the prostate was done, the animals were killed, and the bladder, prostate, and periprostatic tissues were excised for pathologic examination.

RESULTS

Sonographic changes in the prostate 2 weeks after injection were present in all group 1 and 2 animals. All prostates had varying amounts of hemorrhagic and coagulative necrosis, which correlated with the TRUS findings. There were no differentiating pathologic features between group 1 and group 2 specimens. The relative amount of necrosis varied with the doses of dehydrated ethanol and carmustine injected, but was not predictable on the basis of the doses administered. Subclinical prostatic microabscesses were identified in 6 of 10 group 1 animals and 4 of 10 group 2 animals. Only group 2 animals had alterations in their blood chemistry results, all of which were self-limited. Two had white blood cell nadirs of less than 2000 5 days after injection. No animals developed incontinence, and there were no rectal injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraprostatic dehydrated ethanol and carmustine injections were readily controllable under TRUS guidance and resulted in hemorrhagic and coagulative necrosis of prostatic tissue with minimal associated morbidity and no incontinence in the dog model. Hematologic changes observed in the animals that received carmustine were self-limiting.

Follow-up costs after external radiation for low risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Some routine follow-up costs for external radiation for prostate cancer might not be justifiable. To study this possibility, we reviewed the follow-up costs and clinical course of 36 consecutive, unselected patients treated with external beam radiation (EBRT) for low-risk prostate cancer at the University of Washington.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-six consecutive patients with Stage T1/T2 prostate cancer and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml were treated with EBRT with curative intent at the University of Washington from 1990 through 1996. All follow-up visits with each patient's urologist and radiation oncologist, and all laboratory tests were tabulated. Charges quoted in this report are based on University of Washington billing.

RESULTS

A total of 8 patients demonstrated biochemical evidence of tumor progression/persistence, none of whom has had any therapeutic intervention for progressive cancer. No patient had local disease progression by physical examination. One patient experienced a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 3 bowel complication (obstruction), not detected on routine follow-up. The average combined PSA and physician follow-up charges for the first 2 years after therapy was $1,013.

CONCLUSION

The data presented here suggests that for low-risk prostate cancer (PSA < 10 ng/ml), frequent follow-up by physical examinations and PSAs during the first 2 years after therapy is not warranted.

Conformal proton therapy for early-stage prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of proton radiation on clinical and biochemical outcomes for early prostate cancer.

METHODS

Three hundred nineteen patients with T1-T2b prostate cancer and initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels 15.0 ng/mL or less received conformal radiation doses of 74 to 75 cobalt gray equivalent with protons alone or combined with photons. No patient had pre- or post-treatment hormonal therapy until disease progression was documented. Patients were evaluated for biochemical disease-free survival, PSA nadir, and toxicity; the mean and median follow-up period was 43 months.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year clinical and biochemical disease-free survival rates were 97% and 88%, respectively. Initial PSA level, stage, and post-treatment PSA nadir were independent prognostic variables for biochemical disease-free survival: a PSA nadir 0.5 ng/mL or less was associated with a 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rate of 98%, versus 88% and 42% for nadirs 0.51 to 1.0 and greater than 1.0 ng/mL, respectively. No severe treatment-related morbidity was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that patients treated with conformal protons have 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rates comparable to those who undergo radical prostatectomy, and display no significant toxicity. A Phase III randomized dose-escalation trial is underway to define the optimum radiation dose for early-stage prostate cancer.

The long-term effect on PSA values of incidental prostatic irradiation in patients with pelvic malignancies other than prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of external beam radiation therapy on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) production by the benign prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We studied a cohort of 24 men receiving treatment for cancer of the bladder or rectum. The radiation fields in all cases encompassed the prostate gland, and none of the patients were known to have prostate cancer. All patients had 2 or more PSA estimations obtained in the years following their radiation treatment. A second group of 46 patients who had undergone radical external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer and who were clinically disease free 8-22 years later were also observed, with a median of 5.8 years of PSA observations.

RESULTS

Only 3 of the 24 patients in the first group showed a significant rise of > 0.2 ng/ml in their serum PSA levels, with a median of 3.3 years follow-up from the first PSA test. Seven of 24 showed progressive declines, and 14 of 24 showed steady levels. The median PSA for this group was < or = 0.5 ng/ml. Only 6 of the 46 in the second group showed a PSA rise of > 0.2 ng/ml. Thirty-four had stable values, and 6 had further declines. Again, the median PSA for the entire group was < or = 0.5 ng/ml.

CONCLUSION

Recovery of prostatic secretory function is an uncommon event after external beam radiation. The concern that this might significantly confound new definitions of biochemical failure after radical radiation for prostate cancer that are based on progressively rising PSA values thus appears to be unfounded.

Defining the implant treatment volume for patients with low risk prostate cancer: does the anterior base need to be treated?

PURPOSE

An increased incidence of acute urinary retention has been reported after interstitial prostate radiation therapy when the anterior base of the prostate gland receives 100% of the prescription dose. The frequency of prostate cancer in this location as a function of the pre-treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, and 1992 American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging (AJCC) was determined.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred four men treated at the Brigham and Women's Hospital with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer between 1995-1996 comprised the study population. Prostatectomy specimens were whole mounted and the location of each tumor foci enumerated.

RESULTS

Of 269 foci of prostate cancer found in 39 low-risk prostate cancer patients (PSA < 10 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason score < or = 6, and 1992 AJCC clinical stage T1c,2a), a single focus (0.37%) was noted in the anterior base. Conversely, 20/355 (5.6%) and 18/251 (7.2%) tumor foci were noted in the anterior base in 43 patients with intermediate risk and 24 patients with high-risk disease, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A new definition of the treatment volume excluding the anterior base for low-risk prostate cancer patients may be justified.

Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To present nomograms providing estimates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiation therapy (RT) for men diagnosed during the PSA era with clinically localized disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of the pretreatment PSA level, 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score in predicting the time to posttherapy PSA failure in 1,654 men with T1c,2 prostate cancer managed with either RP or RT.

RESULTS

Pretherapy PSA, AJCC clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score were independent predictors (P < .0001) of time to posttherapy PSA failure in patients managed with either RP or RT. Two-year PSA failure rates derived from the Cox regression model and bootstrap estimates of the 95% confidence intervals are presented in the format of a nomogram stratified by the pretreatment PSA, AJCC clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, and local treatment modality.

CONCLUSION

Men at high risk (> 50%) for early (< or = 2 years) PSA failure could be identified on the basis of the type of local therapy received and the clinical information obtained as part of the routine work-up for localized prostate cancer. Selection of these men for trials evaluating adjuvant systemic and improved local therapies may be justified.

Prostate-specific antigen to predict outcome of external beam radiation for prostate cancer: Walter Reed Army Medical Center experience, 1988-1995

OBJECTIVES

To assess the ability of pretreatment and post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements, clinical tumor stage, tumor grade, Gleason sum, race, age, and radiation dose to predict the recurrence of prostate cancer following external beam radiation therapy (XRT) since the introduction of PSA as a tumor marker at one tertiary care center.

METHODS

The recurrence of prostate cancer among 371 evaluable patients of 389 patients treated with XRT at Walter Reed Army Medical Center was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methodology and Cox multivariable regression models. Serologic (PSA) recurrence was determined using three consecutive rises in PSA after a nadir value. Clinical recurrence was defined as local recurrence (palpable or positive biopsy) and/or distant (radiographically evident) recurrence. Mean and median follow-up is 40.2 and 39.4 months, respectively (range 3.0 to 89.5), and minimum follow-up is 18 months for patients who were alive at the time of analysis. No patient received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Potential prognostic factors evaluated are pretreatment PSA, PSA nadir, age, race, clinical tumor stage, tumor grade, Gleason sum, and radiation dose.

RESULTS

Of the 371 evaluable patients, 125 had disease recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for significant pretreatment variables in univariate analyses are as follows: pretreatment PSA less than 4 (79%), 4.1 to 10 (67%), 10.1 to 20 (57%), 20.1 to 50 (27%), and more than 50 (0%); for clinical tumor Stage T1a-T1c (84%), T2a-T2c (51 %), and T3-T4 (29%); for tumor grade well (58%), moderate (58%), and poor (30%). Four-year DFS rates for Gleason sum are 2 to 4 (82%), 5 (72%), 6 (56%), and 7 to 10 (48%). In multivariable Cox regression analysis with backward elimination of nonsignificant variables, age, race, tumor grade, and radiation dose were eliminated, leaving pretreatment PSA, clinical tumor stage, and Gleason sum as significant prognostic factors. Analysis of a Cox model that included nadir PSA as a time-dependent variable showed it to be the strongest prognostic factor variable in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

XRT remains a suitable treatment modality for patients with pretreatment PSA less than 20.0, clinical tumor Stages T1-T2, and Gleason sum 2 to 6 prostate cancer. Patients achieving a nadir value less than 0.5 have more durable treatment outcomes.

Analyzing outcome-based staging for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

A clinical staging system based on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the calculated prostate carcinoma volume (cVCa) construct previously has been proposed. This study was performed to assess whether this proposed clinical staging system was valid in an independent surgical and radiation data set in patients with clinically localized disease.

METHODS

Cox regression multivariable analyses were used to assess the significance of staging systems (1992 American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging [AJCC] clinical and pathologic stage, versus cVCa-PSA clinical stage) to predict time to posttherapy PSA failure in 441 and 465 patients managed by surgery and radiation, respectively. Significant staging systems identified using Cox regression were tested further using established comparative measures to define the most clinically useful system.

RESULTS

Both the 1992 AJCC pathologic stage and the cVCa-PSA clinical stage were significant predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure (P = 0.0001), whereas only the cVCa-PSA clinical stage was a significant predictor of time to postradiation PSA failure (P = 0.0001) using a Cox regression multivariable analysis. Further analyses using a pairwise comparison of the 1992 AJCC pathologic stage and cVCa-PSA clinical stage found the cVCa-PSA staging system provided a more clinically useful prediction of time to postoperative PSA failure. Specifically, the cVCa-PSA staging system was able to identify surgically managed patients with pathologic AJCC T2 disease who did poorly (3-year bNED = 22%) while also selecting patients with clinical AJCC T2b,c disease that was managed by radiation who did well (3-year bNED = 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical staging system based on parameters obtained during the routine evaluation for AJCC clinical T1,2 prostate carcinoma provided a clinically useful stratification of both postoperative and postradiation PSA failure free survival.

Pathologic features from prostate needle biopsy and prognosis after I-125 brachytherapy

To evaluate the role of detailed pathologic features in predicting outcome for early-stage prostate cancer treated with I-125 brachytherapy. The pretreatment biopsy slides of 103 patients with T1/T2 and Gleason scores of 4-7 prostatic carcinoma, which was treated by transperineal I-125 implantation, were reviewed retrospectively by a single pathologist (P.B.G.). Biochemical tumor control rates [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) below 1.0] were correlated with pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, the amount of tumor in the biopsy samples, and the presence of perineural invasion. In Cox proportional-hazard, multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of failure were pretreatment PSA above 10 ng/ml (P = 0.013) and the length of the biopsy specimen replaced by tumor (P = 0.15). The percent of biopsy tissue replaced by tumor (P = 0. 74), perineural invasion (P = 0.78), and Gleason score (P = 0.66) were less predictive of prognosis. It was concluded that pretreatment PSA is the strongest predictor of biochemical failure. Detailed assessment of pathological features on needle biopsy added little prognostic information beyond that of pretreatment PSA alone. Like all other prognostic parameters for prostate cancer, there is considerable overlap in pathologic features between those patients who will or will not be controlled biochemically.

Conformal proton therapy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role and optimum dose of radiation to eradicate prostate cancer continues to be evaluated. Protons offer an opportunity to increase the radiation dose to the prostate while minimizing treatment toxicity.

METHODS

Six hundred forty-three patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with protons, with or without photons. Treatments were planned with a 3D planning system; patients received 74-75 CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent) at 1.8-2.0 CGE per fraction. Patients were evaluated for response to therapy and treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

The overall clinical disease-free survival rate was 89% at 5 years. When post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was used as an endpoint for disease control, the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate was 100% for patients with an initial PSA of < 4.0 ng/ml, and 89%, 72%, and 53% for patients with initial PSA levels of 4.1-10.0, 10.1-20.0, and > 20.0, respectively. Patients in whom the post-treatment PSA nadir was below 0.5 ng/ml did significantly better than those whose nadir values were between 0.51-1.0 or > 1.0 ng/ml: the corresponding 5-year disease-free survival rates were 91%, 79%, and 40%, respectively. Minimal radiation proctitis was seen in 21% of patients; toxicity of greater severity was seen in less than 1%.

CONCLUSION

Proton therapy to 74-75 CGE produced minimal treatment-related toxicity and excellent PSA normalization and disease-free survival in patients with low initial PSA levels. A prospective randomized dose-escalation trial is now underway to help define the optimum dose of radiation for patients with early stage prostate cancer.

Is prostate specific antigen density an important prognostic indicator for patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam therapy?

The purpose of this study was to determine if prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) is a predictor of outcome following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer, and to compare it with other prognostic factors. Between January 1990 and December 1993, 205 patients with T1-T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate received a radical course of external beam irradiation, with no prior or adjuvant hormonal therapy. All patients had pre- and post-treatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) evaluation. They were followed up for at least 24 months. PSAD was defined as the ratio of pre-treatment serum PSA to the prostate volume, as determined from CT treatment planning scans. Prostate volumes were calculated using the prostate ellipse formula. Median PSA density was 0.37, with a range 0.01-6.7. Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive rises in serum PSA, regardless of the magnitude of elevation. 4-year biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) for patients with PSAD < or = 0.3 was 60%, compared with 22% for patients with PSAD > 0.3 (p = < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, pre-treatment PSA (p = < 0.001), Gleason score (p = 0.002), and stage (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of BDFS, while PSAD was not an important prognosticator (p = 0.62). Pre-treatment serum PSA is the most important prognosticator of BDFS, following external beam radiotherapy, for patients with prostate cancer. PSA density did not predict treatment outcome.

Perineural invasion and Gleason 7-10 tumors predict increased failure in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml treated with conformal external beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE

It has been well established that prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml enjoy excellent bNED control when treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy. This report identifies predictors of failure for patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml. These predictors are then used to define favorable and unfavorable prognostic subgroups of patients for which bNED control is compared.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 3/87 and 11/94, 266 patients with T1-T3NXM0 prostate cancer and pretreatment PSA values <10 ng/ml were treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy. Median central axis dose and median follow-up for the entire group was 72 Gy (63-79 Gy) and 48 months (2-120 months). Predictors of bNED control were evaluated univariately using Kaplan-Meier methodology and the log-rank test and multivariately using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Covariates considered were pretreatment PSA, palpation stage, Gleason score, presence of perineual invasion (PNI) and central axis dose. Independent predictors based on multivariate results were then used to stratify the patients into two prognostic groups for which bNED control was compared. bNED failure is defined as PSA > or = 1.5 ng/ml and rising on two consecutive determinations.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis according to pretreatment and treatment factors for bNED control demonstrates a statistically significant improvement in 5-year bNED control for patients with Gleason score 2-6 vs. 7-10, patients without evidence of perineural invasion (PNI) vs. those with PNI, and patients with palpation stage T1/T2AB vs. T2C/T3. Multivariate analysis demonstrates that Gleason score (p = 0.0496), PNI (p = 0.0008) and palpation stage (p = 0.0153) are significant independent predictors of bNED control. Based on these factors, patients are stratified into a more favorable prognosis group (Gleason 2-6, no PNI, and stage T1/T2AB, n = 172) and a less favorable prognosis group (Gleason 7-10 or PNI or T2C/T3, n = 94). A comparison of the two groups reveals that bNED control is significantly lower in the less favorable prognosis group (74% vs. 91% at 5 years, p = 0.0024).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) This report identifies Gleason 7-10 and the presence of PNI as well as palpation stage T2C/T3 as factors that predict worse bNED outcome for patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml who are treated with radiation therapy alone. (2) Patients with these pretreatment prognostic factors may benefit from adjuvant therapies or altered treatment programs. (3) In order to make fair comparisons between radiation therapy and prostatectomy series, the distribution of perineual invasion and Gleason 7-10 must be taken into account.

The fate of 10-year clinically recurrence-free survivors after definitive radiotherapy for T1-3N0M0 prostate cancer

We recently reported the outcome of 168 patients treated with pelvic lymphadenectomy and definitive radiation therapy. This report is a subanalysis of those patients (pts) who were clinically without evidence of disease (NED) 10 years after a negative staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. One hundred of our original cohort of 168 patients had at least ten year follow-up. 76 patients had pathologically negative lymph nodes and had not received hormonal therapy. Forty-two N0 patients with sufficient follow-up were alive and clinically NED 10 years post-operatively. Distribution by disease stage at diagnosis was: Stage A2: 12 pts; Stage B: 19 pts; Stage B2/C: 6 pts; Stage C: 5 pts. Median follow-up was 13.3 years, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Of the 42 patients clinically NED at 10 years, 5 pts died subsequently without PSA data, remaining clinically NED a median of 13 y 3 m postoperatively; 37 patients were alive and without evidence of disease off all therapy at 10 years post-operatively. Bone scans were performed on 8 of the 9 patients with PSA over 4.0 ng/ml or on hormonal therapy. These revealed a single patient with diffuse but asymptomatic bone metastases. Ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies were performed on one 78-year-old patient with elevated PSA 19 years post-operatively, revealing an asymptomatic local recurrence. Patients who survive clinically NED for 10 years have a low likelihood of clinical failure, even in the presence of PSA values between 4.0 and 10 ng/ml. In these patients, PSA trends are of greater utility than absolute values.

The correlation between the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure and clinical outcome for patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation. American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with external beam irradiation (RT) to determine if the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure (BF) following radiation therapy correlates with clinical distant metastases free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1/1/87 and 12/31/92, 568 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital (median total dose 66.6 Gy; range: 60-70.4 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive increases in post-treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) after achieving a nadir. Biochemical failure was recorded as the time midway between the nadir and the first rising PSA. Five-year actuarial rates of clinical DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were calculated for patients who were biochemically controlled (BC) versus those who failed biochemically. Median follow-up was 56 months (range: 24-118 months).

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were significantly greater in patients who were biochemically controlled versus those who were not (p < 0.001). In patients who were BC, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 99%, 99%, 98%, and 99% respectively. For patients who failed biochemically, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 74%, 64%, 89%, and 86% respectively. When stratifying by pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and T stage these differences remained significant for DMFS, DFS, and CSS. The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that BC was the single most important predictor of clinical outcome for DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC. Pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were also independent predictors of outcome for DMFS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of BF following radiation therapy correlates well with clinical DMFS, DFS, and CSS. These findings suggest that the Consensus Panel definition may be a surrogate for clinical progression and survival and should be considered a valid endpoint for separating successful versus unsuccessful treatment. Additional studies with longer follow-up will be needed to corroborate these findings.

PSA for outcome prediction and posttreatment evaluation following radiation for prostate cancer: do we know how to use it?

Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be a powerful predictor of expected outcome after radiation for prostate cancer. Additional measures such as recursive partitioning analysis and PSA Cancer Volume calculations are further refining this useful tool to provide the greatest degree of prognostic information. The post-treatment PSA level is also being used as a means to assess therapeutic efficacy rapidly and objectively. Although no single PSA value has been shown to equate to long-term clinical tumor control consistently, consensus has been reached regarding the value of a rising PSA level as an early surrogate for tumor recurrence. Since the first introduction of PSA as a tumor marker, we have become much more comfortable with what it means, the ways it can help us, and how to use it.

Predicting the outcome of radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: a model-building strategy

BACKGROUND

Clinical research of prostate carcinoma could be enhanced by models that allow early and reliable prediction of outcome. In this study, the authors describe a model-building strategy and compare different models.

METHODS

The sample population was comprised of 158 patients treated definitively with radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors and select the best predictive model. Variables included age, race, method of diagnosis (needle biopsy vs. transurethral resection of the prostate), stage, grade, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), in-treatment PSA (PSA(tx)), posttreatment PSA (PSA(post)), and nadir PSA. The following indices were used to compare discriminatory power: log-likelihood function, Akaike information criterion, the generalized coefficient of determination, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, 49 patients (31%) had recurrence of carcinoma. By univariate analysis, the failure rate was significantly higher in patients with advanced stage, higher grade, higher pretherapy PSA, and nadir PSA > 1 ng/mL (P < 0.0001). Pretherapy PSA was associated significantly with stage, age, and nadir PSA (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). All PSA measurements were significantly interrelated. Nadir PSA was the most predictive variable. Significant gains (P = 0.01) in predictive power were derived from inclusion of PSA(tx), but not PSA (post). Age, race, stage, grade, and method of diagnosis contributed predictive power in addition to that derived from PSA levels (P = 0.01, log-likelihood test). The authors' model of choice predicts outcome with an overall correctness, sensitivity, specificity, and false-negative rate of 81.8%, 87.2%, 79.6%, and 12.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the strategy described, a model was selected that allowed accurate prediction of failure shortly after the completion of therapy.

Radiotherapy options for localized prostate cancer based upon pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen levels and biochemical control: a comprehensive review of the literature

PURPOSE

To review all the available radiotherapy (RT) literature on localized prostate cancer treatment where serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were used to both stratify patients and evaluate outcome and determine if any conclusions can be reached regarding an optimal radiotherapeutic management for this disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to obtain all articles in English on prostate cancer treatment employing RT from 1986-1997. Studies were considered eligible for review only if they met all the following criteria: 1) pretreatment PSA values were recorded and grouped for subsequent evaluation, 2) posttreatment PSA values were continuously monitored, 3) definitions of biochemical control were stated, and 4) the median follow-up was given.

RESULTS

Of the 246 articles identified, only 20 met the inclusion criteria; 4 using conformal external beam RT, 8 using conventional external beam RT, and 8 using interstitial brachytherapy (4 using a permanent implant alone, 3 combining external beam RT with a permanent implant, and 1 combining a conformal temporary interstitial implant boost with external beam RT). No studies using neutrons (with or without external beam RT) or androgen deprivation (combined with external beam RT) were identified where patients were stratified by pretreatment PSA levels. Results for all therapies were extremely variable with the 3-5-year rates of biochemical control for patients with pretreatment PSA levels < or = 4 ng/ml ranging from 48 to 100%, for PSA levels >4 and < or = 10 ng/ml ranging from 44 to 90%, for PSA levels >10 and < or = 20 ng/ml ranging from 27 to 89%, and for PSA levels >20 ranging from 14 to 89%. The median Gleason score, T-stage, definition of biochemical control, and follow-up were substantially different from series to series. No RT option consistently produced superior results.

CONCLUSIONS

When data are reviewed from studies using serum PSA levels to stratify patients and to evaluate treatment outcome, no consistently superior RT technique was identified. These data suggest that standard definitions of disease stage (combining clinical, pathologic, and biochemical criteria) and a common definition of biochemical cure (as developed by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel) need to be adopted to evaluate treatment efficacy and advise patients on the most appropriate radiotherapeutic option for their disease.

Impact of surgical staging in evaluating the radiotherapeutic outcome in RTOG #77-06, a phase III study for T1BN0M0 (A2) and T2N0M0 (B) prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate survival and time to metastatic disease in patients treated for localized prostatic carcinoma in a Phase III radiotherapy (RT) protocol, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 77-06. Patients with T18N0M0 (A2) or T2N0M0 (B) disease after lymphangiogram (LAG) or staging laparotomy (SL) were randomized between prophylactic radiation to the pelvic lymph nodes and prostatic bed vs. prostatic bed alone. The outcome of both treatment arms, as well as a comparison of the LAG group, to that of the SL group, are updated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 449 eligible males were entered into RTOG protocol 7706 between 1978 and 1983. Lymph node staging was mandatory but at the physician's discretion; 117 (26%) patients had SL, while 332 (74%) had LAG. Follow-up was a median of 12 years and a maximum of 16 years. For those randomized to receive prophylactic pelvic lymph nodal irradiation, 45 Gy of megavoltage RT was delivered via multiple portals in 4.5-5 weeks, while all patients received 65 Gy in 6.5-8 weeks to the prostatic bed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in survival whether treatment was administered to the prostate or prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. The SL group had greater 12-year survival than the LAG group (48% vs. 38%, p = 0.02). Disease-free survival was statistically significant, with 38% for the SL group vs. 26% for the LAG group (p = 0.003). Bone metastasis was less common in the SL group (14%) than the LAG group (27%) (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

At 12-year median follow-up, there still was no survival difference in those patients treated prophylactically to the pelvic nodes and prostatic bed vs. the prostatic bed alone. Those patients not surgically staged with only LAG for lymph node evaluation were less accurately staged, as reflected by a statistically significant reduced survival and earlier metastases.

Preliminary outcomes following cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate is a novel therapeutic modality that induces cell lysis in the prostate by direct application of low temperatures. We have been conducting an ongoing prospective pilot study of the use of cryosurgical prostate ablation in treating patients with nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma since January 1993. Results in 145 consecutive patients with mean 36 months and minimum 12 months of followup are presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Accrual was open to patients with clinical stages T1a to T3c prostate adenocarcinoma. Pelvic lymph node dissections were recommended but not required for patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 15 ng./ml. before study entry. PSA changes, random prostate biopsy findings and morbidities after cryosurgical prostate ablation were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Overall actuarial rates at 42 months for maintaining PSA less than 0.3 and less than 1.0 were 59% and 66%, respectively. The overall actuarial progression-free rate at 60 months was 56%. Among 160 biopsies performed 16% showed some evidence of residual carcinoma. Overall crude rates of maintaining either a negative biopsy or PSA less than 0.3 at 6 and 24 months after cryosurgical prostate ablation were 87% and 73%, respectively. Significantly higher morbidities were seen in previously radiated patients undergoing cryosurgical prostate ablation compared to those with no prior radiation. Among nonradiated patients 85% experienced no significant morbidity after cryosurgical prostate ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preliminary, short-term outcomes after cryosurgical prostate ablation appear to be comparable to identical outcomes reported for external beam radiotherapy. Based on these results cryosurgical prostate ablation appears to be an effective therapeutic alternative for treating patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma.

Calculated prostate carcinoma volume: The optimal predictor of 3-year prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure free survival after surgery or radiation therapy of patients with pretreatment PSA levels of 4-20 nanograms per milliliter

BACKGROUND

In this study, the authors evaluated whether a clinically relevant stratification of prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure free survival (bNED) after definitive local therapy could be made for patients with prostate carcinoma clinically classified as T1 or T2 and pretreatment PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL.

METHODS

Multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed for clinically localized prostate carcinoma patients who presented with PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL. Three hundred forty-eight of the patients were managed definitively with conventional external beam radiation therapy (median dose, 67 gray), whereas 547 of the patients were managed definitively with a radical retropubic prostatectomy. The outcome tested was time to posttreatment PSA failure. The clinical predictors evaluated included the standard paradigm (PSA, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical stage); type of local therapy; and a newly defined factor, the calculated prostate cancer volume (cV[Ca]).

RESULTS

Time to posttreatment PSA failure was equivalent (P = 0.52) independent of the type of local therapy. The cV(Ca) (P < 0.0001), pretreatment PSA (P = 0.003), and clinical classification of T2c (P = 0.04) remained significant predictors of time to posttreatment PSA failure in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The staging system described herein, which is based on cV(Ca) and PSA, may optimize patient selection for definitive local therapy and entry onto randomized clinical trials examining the use of adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy in patients with clinically localized disease who present with PSA levels of 4-20 ng/mL. Validation of this staging system by other investigators is currently underway.

Prostate cancer patient subsets showing improved bNED control with adjuvant androgen deprivation

PURPOSE

Cooperative groups have investigated the outcome of androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with variable pretreatment prognostic indicators. This report describes an objective means of selecting patients for adjuvant hormonal therapy by a retrospective matched case/control comparison of outcome between patients with specific pretreatment characteristics who receive adjuvant hormones (RT+H) vs. patients with identical pretreatment characteristics treated with radiation therapy alone (RT). In addition, this report shows the 5-year bNED control for patients selected by this method for RT+H vs. RT alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 10/88 to 12/93, 517 T1-T3 NXM0 patients with known pretreatment PSA level were treated at Fox Chase Cancer Center. Four hundred fifty-nine of those patients were treated with RT alone while 58 were treated with RT+H. The patients were categorized according to putative prognostic factors indicative of bNED control, which include the palpation stage, Gleason score, and pretreatment PSA. We compared actuarial bNED control rates according to treatment group within each of the prognostic groups. In addition, we devised a retrospective matched case/control selection of RT patients for comparison with the RT+H group. Five-year bNED control was compared for the two treatment groups, excluding the best prognosis group, using 56 RT+H patients and 56 matched (by stage, grade, and pretreatment PSA level) controls randomly selected from the RT alone group. bNED control for the entire group of 517 patients was then analyzed multivariately using step-wise Cox regression to determine independent predictors of outcome. Covariates considered for entry into the model included stage (T1/T2AB vs. T2C/T3), grade (2-6 vs. 7-10), pretreatment PSA (0-15 vs. > 15), treatment (RT vs. RT+H), and center of prostate dose. bNED failure is defined as PSA > or = 1.5 ngm/ml and rising on two consecutive determinations. The median follow-up for the 112 matched case/control patients was 41 months. The median follow-up was 46 months for the RT (range 11-102 months) and 37 months for the RT+H group (range 6-82 months).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis according to treatment for the prognostic factors of palpation stage, Gleason score, and pretreatment PSA demonstrates a significant improvement in 3-year bNED control with the addition of hormones for patients with T2C/T3, Gleason score 7-10, or pretreatment PSA > 15 ngm/ml. A comparison of bNED control according to treatment demonstrates improvement in 5-year bNED control of 55% for patients treated with RT+H vs. 31% for those patients treated with RT alone (p = 0.0088), although there is not a survival advantage. Multivariate analysis demonstrates that hormonal treatment is a highly significant independent predictor of bNED control (p = 0.0006) along with pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0001), palpation stage (p = 0.0001), grade (p = 0.0030), and dose (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Patients with specific adverse pretreatment prognostic factors (i.e., T2C/T3, Gleason score 7-10, pretreatment PSA > 15) benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy. (2) Upon multivariate analysis, hormonal therapy is determined to be a highly significant predictor of bNED control, after adjusting for all other covariates. (3) The 5-year bNED control rates of 55% for RT+H vs. 31% for RT alone represents the magnitude of benefit from adjuvant hormone therapy. (4) The bNED control curves are separated by about 20 months, representing a delay in disease progression with adjuvant hormonal therapy, as there is no overall survival difference.

Postradiotherapy PSA nadirs fail to support dose escalation study in patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml

With three-dimensional conformal therapy, doses > 75 Gy have been delivered to the prostate with acceptable levels of morbidity; however, higher doses do appear to increase late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity. Because patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values < 10 ng/ml can achieve 3-year actuarial bNED control rates of 90% after treatment with external beam radiotherapy to doses < 71 Gy, one might question the need for further dose escalation in this population. In this report, we examined the relationship between dose and PSA nadir for 90 patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml entered into a dose escalation study from March 1987 to October 1992. We wanted to see if nadir response data would predict a different outcome from our 3-year bNED control reports. All patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy to ICRU reporting point doses of 6,598 cGy to 7,895 cGy (median of 7,068 cGy). Minimum follow-up was 36 months (median, 47 months). Seven hundred thirty-nine posttreatment PSA nadir values were analyzed, yielding an average of 8.2 values per patient. Estimates of rates of bNED control and time to reach a posttreatment PSA of 1.0 ng/ml were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in rates according to dose levels. Linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to relate dose to bNED control on a continuum. Escalating doses from 66 to 79 Gy failed to increase the percentage of patients achieving nadir values < 1 ng/ml and similarly failed to increase the 3-year actuarial bNED control. Linear regression (P = .81) and the chi-square test of association (P = .23) supported the lack of a dose effect on nadir continuously and categorically, respectively, and the Cox regression model supported the conclusion that dose on a continuum has no effect on bNED control (P = .34). Furthermore, time to reach a posttreatment PSA level of 1.0 ng/ml was not statistically dependent on dose level (P = .13). Based on this study and prior reports demonstrating a dose response for late GI/GU morbidity, we question whether further dose escalation in this subgroup of patients is justified.

Analyzing predictive models following definitive radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

As we approach the 21st century, clinically useful predictive models for prostate carcinoma are urgently needed to stratify patients reliably for future treatment strategies. Recently, many investigators have developed models that employ prostate specific antigen (PSA)-based constructs or groupings in an attempt to predict outcome accurately following definitive radiotherapy. This investigation was conducted to determine which of these models provides the closest "fit" to independent clinical outcome data measuring biochemical freedom from failure (bNED control), thereby warranting further exploration.

METHODS

Six models were analyzed in a definitive radiotherapy series of 421 patients with localized prostate carcinoma treated with a median dose of 74 Gray (Gy) between March 1988 and November 1994. A stepwise Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to predict for bNED control using the following covariates: PSA, Gleason's score, stage, dose, PSA density, and perineural invasion. Subsequent MVAs were performed for each model incorporating the new construct or prognostic groupings. The adequacy of the models was confirmed using plots of score residuals against time to bNED failure and comparisons were made used Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC) in which a smaller value corresponds to a statistically improved model based on explained variation and the number of predictors. Because PSA was distributed in a log-normal fashion in the current study population, the model-building process was duplicated using a logarithmic transformation analysis. Biochemical failure was defined as 2 consecutive elevations in the PSA > or = 1.5 ng/mL. The median follow-up time was 34 months (range, 2-87 months).

RESULTS

Initially, the model developed by Pisansky et al. appeared the most predictive due to the parsimony in their risk estimate, which is the sole predictor of outcome, as well as its associated lowest AIC value. However, after the logarithmic transformation analysis, all the models appeared to be equally predictive of bNED outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A plethora of accurate models for predicting outcome following definitive radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma recently have been engineered, all of which are essentially equally predictive in this data base (via a logarithmic conversion process). This analysis should be corroborated in other large radiotherapy series.

Kinetics of serum prostate-specific antigen after external beam radiation for clinically localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine the kinetics of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer and to evaluate whether such kinetics provide prognostic information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight hundred forty-one men with serial PSA determinations who underwent external beam radiation without androgen ablation were analyzed to determine postradiation PSA kinetic parameters (half-life and doubling time) and to correlate these parameters with disease outcome. Non-linear regression techniques were used to determine half-lives and doubling times.

RESULTS

The postradiation serum PSA data fitted well to first order kinetic models. The median PSA half-life was 1.6 months (range 0.5-9.2 months). There was no correlation between half-life and T-stage or Gleason grade. A significant but quantitatively weak correlation was present between the pretreatment PSA level and half-life; lower pretreatment levels were associated with longer half-lives. Half-life did not correlate with disease outcome whether the endpoint was local recurrence, distant metastasis or rising PSA. In 263 men with a rising postradiation PSA profile the median PSA doubling time was 12.2 months (range 0.8-80.2 months). Faster doubling times were significantly associated with higher T-stage, higher Gleason grade and higher pretreatment PSA levels. Thus, patients with initially adverse disease developed faster rising PSA values after treatment than patients with less adverse disease. The most striking correlation was between rapid doubling time and the likelihood of metastatic relapse. Patients who developed metastases had a median PSA doubling time of 4.2 months compared to a median doubling time of 11.7 months in patients who developed local recurrence. Overall, patients with a PSA doubling time of less than 8 months had a 7-year actuarial metastatic rate of 54%, while patients with a PSA doubling time exceeding 8 months had only a 7% metastatic rate. Particularly ominous was the combination of a doubling time shorter than 8 months which began to rise within the first year; by 3 years 50% of these men had metastases and all were actuarially projected to develop such relapse by 6.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the clinical utility of postradiation serum PSA kinetics was small. There were no discernible uses for PSA half-life. In patients with a rising PSA profile the faster the kinetics the more adverse the disease. Doubling times shorter than 8 months, especially if the rise begins in the first year, predict for metastatic relapse. However, in the absence of decisively useful treatment for metastatic prostate cancer the virtues of the early detection of metastases remain unclear.

Rate of PSA rise predicts metastatic versus local recurrence after definitive radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) following treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate indicates eventual clinical failure, but the rate of rise can be quite different from patient to patient, as can the pattern of clinical failure. We sought to determine whether the rate of PSA rise could differentiate future local versus metastatic failure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two thousand six hundred sixty-seven PSA values from 400 patients treated with radiotherapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate were analyzed with respect to PSA patterns and clinical outcome. Patients had received no hormonal therapy or prostate surgery and had > 4 PSA values post-treatment. PSA rate of rise, determined by the slope of the natural log, was classified as gradual [< 0.69 log(ng/ml)/year, or doubling time (DT) > 1 year], moderate [0.69-1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT 6 months-1 year], or rapid [> 1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT < 6 months].

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of patients had non-rising PSA following treatment; 25% of patients with rising PSA developed clinical failure, and 93% of patients with clinical failure had rising PSA. The rate of rise discerned different clinical failure patterns. Local failure occurred in 23% of patients with moderate rate of rise versus 7% with gradual rise (p = 0.0001). Metastatic disease developed in 46% of those with rapid rise versus 8% with moderate rise (p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, in addition to rate of rise, PSA nadir and rate of decline predicted local failure; those with post-treatment nadir of 1-4 ng/ml were five times more likely to experience local failure than nadir < 1 ng/ml (p = 0.0002). Rapid rate of rise was the most significant independent predictor of metastatic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of PSA rise following definitive radiotherapy can predict clinical failure patterns, with a rapidly rising PSA indicating metastatic recurrence and moderately rising PSA local recurrence. This information could potentially direct therapy; if the rise predicts metastatic failure hormonal therapy could be considered, while aggressive salvage therapy may benefit subclinical local recurrence identified by a moderate rate of PSA rise.