Progressive improvement in the structure of resistance arteries of hypertensive patients after 2 years of treatment with an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor. Comparison with effects of a beta-blocker

Vascular signaling pathways in the metabolic syndrome

There are several potential cellular and molecular pathways whereby cardiovascular risk factors act through very specific signal transduction pathways in the formation of atherosclerosis, as seen often in the metabolic syndrome. Many examples point to multiple postreceptor defects in the insulin signaling pathway in vascular tissue, however, there are differences in the insulin receptor pathway in vascular tissue compared with skeletal muscle or fat. In addition to insulin receptors, insulin may affect atherosclerotic changes in the vascular cells via stimulation of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors and their signaling pathway. Insulin also causes activation of the vascular renin-angiotensin system in both vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells. Insulin-activated tissue renin-angiotensin system leads to increased cell growth and contributes to the cause of atherosclerosis. The fact that agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system also block insulin-mediated renin-angiotensin system expression and cell growth reinforces the potential implication of a vascular insulin-renin-angiotensin system pathway. Finally, novel substances such as the adipokines, factors produced from fat cells, reveal new risk factors in the metabolic syndrome and offer further evidence for a link between insulin resistance and accelerated atherosclerosis.

Effect of amlodipine compared to atenolol on small arteries of previously untreated essential hypertensive patients

In a previous retrospective study, long-term treatment of essential hypertensive patients with a slow-release calcium channel blocker resulted in normal resistance artery structure and endothelial function, which did not occur with a beta-blocker. In the present prospective study, 19 previously untreated essential hypertensive patients (aged 47 +/- 2 years, 75% male) were treated for 1 year in a double-blind randomized study with the long-acting calcium channel blocker amlodipine or the beta-blocker atenolol. Resistance arteries (lumen diameter, 150 to 350 microm) dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies were studied on a pressurized myograph. Blood pressure (BP) control (129 +/- 2/85 +/- 2 mm Hg) was identical in both groups for the last 6 months of the study. After 1 year of treatment with amlodipine, the media-to-lumen ratio (M/L) of resistance arteries decreased from 7.89% +/- 0.40% to 6.81% +/- 0.41% (P < .05). Acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation tended to improve from 84.3% +/- 5.5% to 90.5% +/- 4.8% (P = .06), whereas sodium nitroprusside-induced relaxation was unchanged in the patients treated with amlodipine. In the beta-blocker-treated group there was no significant change in M/L or acetylcholine-induced relaxation. In conclusion, treatment with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine corrected altered resistance artery structure and tended to improve endothelial function in essential hypertensive patients, whereas similar good control of BP with the beta-blocker atenolol did not. Whether the vascular protective effect of amlodipine will result in improved outcomes in hypertension remains to be demonstrated.

Long-term treatment with perindopril ameliorates dobutamine-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease

The present study was designed to examine whether long-term blockade of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) with perindopril ameliorates dobutamine-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Twelve patients with proven CAD were randomly divided in two groups; one group received perindopril (8 mg/day, p.o.) for 3 months and another group served as a control. To evaluate anti-ischemic effects of perindopril, dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed before and 3 months after the treatment in a double-blind manner. Long-term treatment with perindopril significantly ameliorated the dobutamine-induced myocardial ischemia, as evaluated by time to the onset of symptoms, magnitude of electrocardiographic ST-segment changes, and left ventricular wall motion score (all P<0.05). The treatment significantly decreased serum ACE activities (P<0.01) and increased plasma bradykinin concentrations (P<0.05). The extent of reduction of left ventricular wall motion score by perindopril was closely correlated with that of inhibition of serum ACE activities (P<0.01) and with that of increase in plasma bradykinin concentrations (P<0.05). By contrast, no such beneficial changes were noted in the control group. These results provide the first evidence that long-term treatment with perindopril exerts anti-ischemic effects on the myocardial ischemia induced by increased myocardial oxygen demand in patients with CAD.

Effect of crossing over hypertensive patients from a beta-blocker to an angiotensin receptor antagonist on resistance artery structure and on endothelial function

BACKGROUND

Treatment of essential hypertensive patients with an AT1 angiotensin receptor antagonist has previously resulted in correction of resistance artery structure and endothelial function, whereas in a parallel group treated with the beta-blocker atenolol there was no improvement of altered vascular structure and function. To test the hypothesis that patients previously treated with atenolol could present improvement of vascular structure and endothelial function if they were subjected to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, we crossed over hypertensive patients that had been randomized to treatment with the beta-blocker atenolol to treatment with the AT1 antagonist irbesartan, and studied small artery structure and endothelial function before and after treatment.

METHODS

Eleven essential hypertensive patients (51 +/- 2 years, range 38-65; 75% male) that had previously been randomized to treatment with atenolol and treated for 1 year with good blood pressure control, were crossed over to treatment with the AT1 antagonist irbesartan for 1 year. Small resistance arteries were dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies that were performed before and after 1 year of treatment. The structure and endothelial function of the resistance arteries were studied on a pressurized myograph.

RESULTS

Blood pressure control (129 +/- 3.3/85 +/- 1.8 mmHg) was identical to that achieved previously with atenolol (131 +/- 3.3/84 +/- 1.1 mmHg). Following 1 year of treatment, the arterial media width to lumen ratio (M/L) of resistance arteries (lumen diameter, 150-350 microm), which had remained unchanged under atenolol treatment, decreased from 8.44 +/- 0.45% when patients were on atenolol, to 6.46 +/- 0.30%, P < 0.01, when patients received irbesartan. Maximal acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation was 81.1 +/- 4.1% when patients were on atenolol, unchanged from before starting treatment with the beta-blocker, and was normalized by irbesartan (to 94.8 +/- 2.0%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Crossing over essential hypertensive patients with well-controlled blood pressure from the beta-blocker atenolol to the AT1 receptor antagonist irbesartan resulted in correction of previously persistently altered vascular structure and endothelial function, suggesting a structural and endothelial vascular protective effect of antihypertensive treatment with the AT1 receptor antagonist.

Effects of candesartan on cardiac and arterial structure and function in hypertensive subjects

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of candesartan cilexetil on left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, arterial structure and function and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients (n=35), aged >20 years, with hypertension and average baseline LVMI of 89 g/m2 were treated for 24 weeks with candesartan, 16 mg o.d., following a four-week placebo run-in period. If diastolic BP remained above 95 mmHg, hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg o.d.,was added. Left ventricular structure and function were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography. Arterial function and structure were assessed using pulse wave analysis to calculate augmentation index (AIx) and forearm plethysmography to calculate minimum vascular resistance. BP was measured in the office and by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).

RESULTS

The mean reduction in LVMI was 4.4 g/m2(p=0.022). Left ventricular systolic function was not significantly altered from baseline, but diastolic function significantly improved: the mean change in diastolic time was 54 ms (p=0.037), in peak velocity filling 6.3 cm/s (p=0.023); E:A ratio improved by 0.08 (p=0.049). The mean reduction in forearm vascular resistance was 15 units at rest (p=0.001) and 1.3 units after limb ischaemia (p=0.006). AIx decreased significantly, with a mean reduction of 9% (p<0.001). Central BP also significantly reduced(systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure 31/20 mmHg; p<0.001). BP was significantly reduced, both in the office (22/16 mmHg; p<0.001) and by 24-hourABPM (18/12 mmHg; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with candesartan, 16 mg o.d., with or without hydrochlorothiazide, for 24 weeks, significantly reduced left ventricular mass and arterial hypertrophy in patients with hypertension. In parallel, there were significant improvements in left ventricular diastolic function and arterial function.

Current strategies and perspectives for correcting endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis

The vascular endothelium synthesizes and releases a spectrum of vasoactive substances such as nitric oxide and endothelin. In atherosclerosis, the delicate balance between endothelium-derived factors is disturbed. Endothelin acts as the natural counterpart to endothelium-derived nitric oxide, which exerts vasodilating, antithrombotic and antiproliferative effects, and inhibits leukocyte adhesion to the vascular wall. Besides its blood pressure increasing effect in man, endothelin also induces vascular and myocardial hypertrophy, which are independent risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The derangement of endothelial function in atherosclerosis is likely to be caused in part by genetic factors, but is also due to cardiovascular risk factors. Endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis is crucial for the development of the disease process in the vasculature and is therefore an important therapeutic target. However, the efficacy of pharmacotherapy aimed at an improvement in endothelial function depends on the individual risk factor profile of the patient.

Blood pressure control and benefits of antihypertensive therapy: does it make a difference which agents we use?

This article debates the important question of whether blood pressure lowering alone is responsible for the benefits accrued from antihypertensive therapy as demonstrated in many multicenter randomized clinical trials with different antihypertensive agents or whether there is evidence that some agents have special properties that result in benefits that go beyond those resulting from lowering blood pressure. Over the past >/=30 years, it has been demonstrated beyond any doubt that lowering blood pressure in severe forms of hypertension, and more recently in systolic and even mild hypertension, will result in reduced incidence of stroke and slower progression of heart and renal failure. These effects have been easier to demonstrate in sicker patients, because enough end points may be counted in the 3 to 5 years that these clinical trials last. However, risk attributable to high blood pressure comes, to a greater degree, from the much larger group of hypertensive individuals who have less severe forms of hypertension. Blood pressure lowering offers less protection from coronary heart disease, which is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients, than from stroke. With the introduction of agents such as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or calcium channel blockers, it has been demonstrated that hypertensive vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction may be corrected. It has therefore been suggested that benefits beyond blood pressure lowering may be achieved with the use of specific drugs to lower blood pressure. Although some evidence suggests that this may be the case, it is difficult to extrapolate from mechanistic studies to prevention of hard end points in outcome trials and vice versa. The question remains for the time being largely unanswered.

Effects of antihypertensive drugs on vascular remodeling: do they predict outcome in response to antihypertensive therapy?

Remodeling of large and small arteries in hypertension contributes to elevation of blood pressure, and may participate in the complications of hypertension. Large arteries exhibit increased lumen size, thickened media with increased collagen deposition, and decreased compliance, which contributes to raised systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure. In small (resistance) arteries smooth muscle cells are restructured around a smaller lumen, without true hypertrophy, particularly in milder forms of hypertension, whereas in severe forms and in secondary hypertension hypertrophic remodeling has been reported. Endothelial dysfunction occurs in many patients, with prevalence similar to that of left ventricular hypertrophy. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor subtype 1 antagonists and long-acting calcium channel blockers has corrected changes in large and small arteries in hypertensive patients. Treatment with beta-blockers did not modify either structure or function of small arteries. Improved outcomes were reported in clinical trials with drugs that exert vascular protective effects, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor subtype 1 antagonists, as well as with those that do not appear to improve vascular structure or function. Recent trials suggest that these different drugs may provide similar benefits essentially through blood pressure lowering, although some minor differences between drugs have been noted. For example, the alpha-blocker doxasozin has been associated with worse outcomes (heart failure) than have diuretics. That hard end-point clinical trials have not demonstrated any advantages of agents with vasculoprotective properties may relate in part to the relatively short duration of some of these multicenter trials (3-5 years). Another contributing factor may be the low number of events with each drug class in the longer trials. Thus, current evidence does not support the rational expectation that vasculoprotective antihypertensive agents will be associated with better outcomes in hypertensive patients, possibly because of limitations of these trials.

Small artery remodeling in hypertension: can it be corrected?

Vascular structure, function, and mechanics are altered in hypertension, which contributes to an important degree to complications of elevated blood pressure. Vascular hypertrophy with collagen deposition and increased stiffness is found in large arteries, whereas in small arteries, smooth muscle cells are restructured around a smaller lumen, and there is no net growth of the vascular wall, particularly in milder forms of hypertension. Hypertrophic remodeling and increased small artery stiffness may be found in more severe hypertension. Endothelial dysfunction occurs in large or smaller vessels in a variable percentage of patients, particularly in presence of other risk factors such as diabetes, smoking, dyslipidemia, and advanced atherosclerosis. In clinical trials, 1-year treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists, and long-acting calcium channel blockers corrected small artery structure and endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients, whereas beta-adrenergic receptor blockers did not. Improved outcomes in hypertensive patients demonstrated in recent trials with some but not others of these agents could be a consequence, at least in part, of vascular protection offered by some antihypertensive agents.

Correlation of endothelial function in large and small arteries in human essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The structure and function of blood vessels varies along the vascular tree, and alterations found in hypertension are also different. The aim of this study was to determine whether non-invasive measurement of endothelial function in conduit arteries reflects that of subcutaneous resistance arteries measured in vitro.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixteen essential hypertensive patients (aged 50 +/- 2 years) were studied. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) during reactive hyperemia (endothelium-dependent) and sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced dilatation (endothelium-independent) were assessed in brachial arteries by ultrasound. Structure, and acetylcholine (10(-9) to 10(-4) mol/l) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10(-8) to 10(-3) mol/l)-induced vasorelaxation of resistance arteries dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies were measured in vitro using a pressurized myograph. Brachial artery FMD and NTG-induced dilatation were 8.4 +/- 1.0 and 18.1 +/- 1.4%, respectively. Resistance arteries of hypertensive patients showed greater media:lumen ratio (8.6 +/- 0.4 versus 5.9 +/- 0.3% in normotensive subjects, P< 0.01), and maximal acetylcholine responses was diminished to 75 +/- 6% compared to normotensive subjects (97 +/- 2%, P< 0.01). FMD correlated with maximal acetylcholine responses (r2 = 0.57, P< 0.001). FMD did not correlate significantly with the media: lumen ratio of resistance arteries (r2 = -0.22, P= 0.07). By multivariate analysis, FMD predicted resistance artery endothelial function independently of age, sex, body mass index, blood lipid status and lumen diameter of brachial artery (beta = 0.81, P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Endothelial dilatory responses are similar in large and small arteries in hypertensive patients. Abnormal FMD in the brachial artery predicts the presence of endothelial dysfunction in human resistance arteries, suggesting that impairment of endothelial function is a generalized alteration in hypertension. Ultrasound measurement of endothelial dysfunction in the brachial artery appears to be less sensitive than in-vitro measurement in resistance arteries.

Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I promotes angiotensinogen production and growth in vascular smooth muscle cells

BACKGROUND

Circulating insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels are increased in patients with hypertension and insulin resistance. Since both hormones are known to have cell growth-promoting effects, they may contribute to the progression of vascular hypertrophy in patients with insulin resistance. Insulin-mediated activation of the vascular renin-angiotensin system (RAS) stimulates growth in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC).

OBJECTIVE

In order to evaluate the role of IGF-I-mediated activation of components of the tissue RAS, we examined the effect of IGF-I receptor stimulation on cell proliferation, and production of angiotensinogen in cultured VSMC.

STUDY DESIGN

Aortic VSMC were derived from male Sprague-Dawley rats. IGF-I and insulin-mediated DNA synthesis were estimated by 3H-thymidine uptake (3H-TdR) with or without the angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril. Moreover, angiotensinogen released by the cells to the culture medium was determined by radioimmunoassay with or without the anti-IGF-I receptor antibody alphaIR3 or captopril.

RESULTS

Both IGF-I and insulin increased 3H-TdR uptake by cultured rat VSMC (P < 0.05). Captopril blocked IGF-I and insulin-mediated 3H-TdR uptake (-34.4 +/- 1.9% and -32.7 +/- 1.8%, P < 0.05, respectively). IGF-I increased the angiotensinogen level in the medium by 30.6 +/- 2.9% (P < 0.01). Insulin also stimulated angiotensinogen synthesis by 26.3 +/- 2.2% (P < 0.01). Captopril and alphaIR3 significantly suppressed angiotensinogen production stimulated by both IGF-I and insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that IGF-I as well as insulin stimulates angiotensinogen production and growth in VSMC. Thus, both hormones may independently play a role in progression of the vascular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis in patients with hypertension and insulin resistance through activation of the tissue RAS.

Is there a preferred antihypertensive therapy for isolated systolic hypertension and reduced arterial compliance?

Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is the most common type of hypertension and the most difficult type to control with antihypertensive therapy. ISH, by definition, is wide pulse pressure hypertension resulting largely from excessive large artery stiffness and representing an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the older aged population. Two major intervention studies of ISH have shown significant benefit in reducing systolic blood pressure with active drug therapy, including thiazide diuretics and calcium receptor antagonists. The optimal treatment strategy is to maximize reduction in systolic blood pressure and to minimize reduction in diastolic blood pressure, thereby reducing pulse pressure. All classes of antihypertensive drugs reduce pulse pressure by means of lowering peripheral resistance, but certain drugs like nitrates, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and other drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin system have multiple actions that improve large artery stiffness and early wave reflection and are especially useful in treating ISH in the elderly.

Effects of antihypertensive therapy on hypertensive vascular disease

Hypertension is associated with alterations in the structure, function, and mechanical properties of large and small arteries. Changes in the endothelium, smooth muscle cell, extracellular matrix, and possibly the adventitia, contribute to complications of hypertension. In large arteries, vascular hypertrophy is found, often with increased stiffness of media components. In small arteries, particularly in mild hypertension, rearrangement of smooth muscle cells around a smaller lumen without changes in media volume (eutrophic remodeling) occurs; in more severe hypertension, hypertrophic remodeling with increased vascular stiffness can be found. Vascular remodeling is accompanied by an increase in the extracellular matrix, particularly collagen deposition. Recent studies have demonstrated that vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction of small and large vessels may be normalized by treatment with some antihypertensive agents (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonists, and long-acting calcium channel blockers). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have now been shown to improve outcomes in hypertensive patients, an effect that may in part be related to the vascular protective effects reviewed here.

Disparate effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol treatment of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats on endothelial function of resistance arteries

In human hypertension, blockade of beta-adrenoceptors does not improve resistance artery structure or endothelial dysfunction. We tested in hypertensive rats the hypothesis that carvedilol, a beta-blocker with antioxidant properties, would improve endothelial dysfunction, whereas the beta1-selective blocker, metoprolol, would not. Twenty-week-old SHRSP were treated orally for 10 weeks with carvedilol (50 mg/kg/day) or metoprolol (100 mg/kg/day), with or without hydralazine (25 mg/kg/day), the latter because neither beta-blocker was a very effective blood pressure-lowering agent in this model. Mesenteric arteries (lumen, <300 microm) were studied on a pressurized myograph. After 10 weeks, untreated SHRSP had a systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) of 239+/-3 that was unaffected by carvedilol or metoprolol treatment but decreased (p < 0.05) by hydralazine (187+/-4), carvedilol + hydralazine (221+/-3), and metoprolol + hydralazine (197+/-3). Carvedilol alone improved endothelium-dependent relaxation of resistance arteries, as elicited by the lowest concentration of acetylcholine studied (10(-7) M), whereas metoprolol had no effect. Hydralazine improved endothelial function as elicited by acetylcholine at a dose of 10(-6) M, also found under cotreatment with carvedilol but attenuated by cotreatment with metoprolol. Carvedilol or metoprolol alone had no significant effect on endothelium-independent relaxation produced by a nitric oxide donor (sodium nitroprusside). However, vessels from rats treated with carvedilol + hydralazine exhibited significantly greater relaxation than those from rats treated with metoprolol + hydralazine. These data suggest that carvedilol may have favorable effects on hypertension-related endothelial dysfunction not observed with metoprolol. Neither drug corrected small artery structure in SHRSP.

Correction of arterial structure and endothelial dysfunction in human essential hypertension by the angiotensin receptor antagonist losartan

BACKGROUND

Structural and functional alterations of the vasculature may contribute to complications of hypertension. Because angiotensin II may be pivotal in some of these vascular abnormalities, we tested the hypothesis that the angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist losartan, in contrast to the beta-blocker atenolol, would correct resistance artery abnormalities in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nineteen untreated patients with mild essential hypertension (47+/-2 years, range 30 to 65 years; 57% male) were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to losartan or atenolol treatment for 1 year. Nine age/sex-matched normotensive subjects were also studied. Both treatments reduced blood pressure to a comparable degree (losartan, from 149+/-4.1/101+/-1.6 to 128+/-3.6/86+/-2.2 mm Hg, P<0.01; atenolol, from 150+/-4.0/99+/-1.2 to 130+/-3.2/84+/-1.4 mm Hg, P<0.01). Resistance arteries (luminal diameter 150 to 350 microm) dissected from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies were studied on a pressurized myograph. After 1 year of treatment, the ratio of the media width to lumen diameter of arteries from losartan-treated patients was significantly reduced (from 8.4+/-0.4% to 6.7+/-0.3%, P<0.01). Arteries from atenolol-treated patients exhibited no significant change (from 8. 3+/-0.3% to 8.8+/-0.5% after treatment). Endothelium-dependent relaxation (acetylcholine-induced) was normalized by losartan (from 82.1+/-4.9% to 94.7+/-1.1%, P<0.01) but not by atenolol (from 80. 4+/-2.7% to 81.7+/-4.6%). Endothelium-independent relaxation (by sodium nitroprusside) was unchanged after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The AT(1) antagonist losartan corrected the altered structure and endothelial dysfunction of resistance arteries from patients with essential hypertension, whereas the beta-blocker atenolol had no effect.

Time course of the effects of temocapril on cardiovascular structure and function in patients with essential hypertension

To investigate the time course of cardiovascular structural changes in patients with essential hypertension after angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, we determined left ventricular structure, minimal vascular resistance in the forearm as an index of resistance vessel structure and stiffness beta of carotid artery in 15 essential hypertensive subjects during a placebo period and after 2, 6, and 12 months of temocapril treatment. Blood pressure decreased within 2 weeks, and the antihypertensive effects were noted throughout the 12-month administration period. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly after 2 months (120+/-12 to 106+/-9 g/m2; p < 0.01) and was normalized after 12 months (88+/-6 g/m2). Postischemic minimal vascular resistance in the forearm decreased gradually from 2.1+/-0.5 to 1.6+/-0.4 PRU at month 12 of temocapril treatment. In contrast, increased stiffness index beta of carotid artery was not altered during a 1-year treatment period (11.4+/-4.9 to 11.6+/-3.8 at month 12 of treatment). These data indicated that the regression of structural changes of left ventricle and arterioles occurred gradually and progressively for 1-year treatment with ACE inhibition, but large arteries were not affected.

Relationship between small-artery structure and systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure in essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Studies of cerebral arterioles have suggested that pulse pressure may be a more important determinant of small-artery structure than systolic, diastolic or mean blood pressure in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats and in rats with an arterio-venous shunt. A study of small arteries has suggested that this is not the case in human essential hypertension. We therefore investigated the role of hemodynamic determinants on small-artery structure in hypertensive patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

To determine whether pulse pressure contributes to structural alterations in human essential hypertension, small arteries (lumen < 300 microns) were obtained from gluteal subcutaneous biopsies of 40 normotensive subjects aged 40.7 +/- 1.2 years and 45 untreated essential hypertensive humans aged 46.5 +/- 1.3 years. The relationship between the media: lumen ratio of the small arteries and levels of systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure and pulse pressure was investigated.

RESULTS

The media: lumen ratio (5.33 +/- 0.001%) of small gluteal subcutaneous arteries of normotensive subjects was significantly smaller and the lumen diameter (306 +/- 13 microns) significantly larger than in untreated hypertensive patients (7.42 +/- 0.001% and 244 +/- 9.7 microns respectively, P < 0.001). The media: lumen ratio of both groups examined together correlated with systolic blood pressure (r = 0.45, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.56, P < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (r = 0.55, P < 0.001). The media: lumen ratio of vessels from hypertensive patients correlated with diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.22, P < 0.01) but not with systolic or mean blood pressure. There was no correlation between the media: lumen ratio of small gluteal subcutaneous arteries and pulse pressure in this population of normotensive and hypertensive subjects, examined together or separately.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that in 30- to 65-year-old humans with systolodiastolic essential hypertension, pulse pressure does not appear to be an important determinant of small-artery structure.

Effects of cilazapril on the retinal vessels in spontaneously hypertensive rats: corrosion cast and scanning electron microscopic study

The effects of the long-term oral angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, cilazapril, on retinal circulation in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive (SHR-SP) rats were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), corrosion casts and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Two groups of 20 male SHR-SP rats were compared. One group was treated with 10 mg/kg/day of cilazapril from 4 to 40 weeks of age, and the other group received no treatment. A third group of male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats served as age-matched controls. At regular intervals the rats were weighed, and their systolic blood pressure was measured. Cilazapril normalized systolic arterial pressure to 121+/-2.7 mm Hg (SD) in the treated SHR-SP rats. There was no significant difference in body weight between the two groups of SHR-SP. In the 40-week-old SHR-SP rats without treatment corrosion cast and SEM revealed hypertensive retinal vascular changes. In the 40-week-old SHR-SP rats treated with cilazapril, these changes were markedly decreased to the level seen in WKY rats. The differences in caliber of retinal capillaries between the treated SHR-SP and untreated SHR-SP rats were statistically significant (p<.0001). TEM in the cilazapril-treated SHR-SP rats revealed intact basement membranes (0.29+/-0.057 microm) of the endothelial cells and pericytes, but in the untreated SHR-SP rats the basement membrane was thickened (0.51+/-0.123 microm) (p<.0001) and the pericytes damaged. Our results show that the long-term administration of cilazapril decreased systolic arterial pressure to a nearly normal level and prevented hypertensive retinal vascular changes, probably by improving endothelial function. The effects of cilazapril on the retinal vasculature are described for the first time. SEM of corrosion casts is a valuable technique for showing the effects of some drugs on the vasculature easily, precisely and three-dimensionally.

Total arterial compliance in ambulatory hypertension during selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blockade and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition

Aortic root flow and pressure estimates were obtained noninvasively with Doppler echocardiography and calibrated subclavian artery pulse tracing in 30 subjects with ambulatory hypertension in a randomized, crossover study with 4 weeks' treatment and washout periods. Total arterial compliance, assessed by use of a three-element Windkessel model of the arterial tree, increased 42% with atenolol (50-100 mg once daily), and 7% (p = NS) with captopril (25-50 mg twice daily). Atenolol reduced mean arterial pressure by 15%, heart rate by 22%, and cardiac output by 14%, and increased acceleration time of aortic root flow by 17% and stroke volume and ejection time each by 11%. Captopril reduced mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance each by 7%. Acceleration time of aortic root flow, ejection time, heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output were not significantly changed by captopril. We conclude that total arterial compliance, at the operational blood pressure, increases during selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blockade in subjects with ambulatory hypertension. Although the main mechanism may be a reduction in mean arterial pressure, it should be considered whether reduced heart rate may play an additional role. The nonsignificant increase in total arterial compliance during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may primarily be a consequence of a modest reduction of the mean arterial pressure.

Comparison of effects of quinapril and metoprolol on glycaemic control, serum lipids, blood pressure, albuminuria and quality of life in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients with hypertension. Swedish Quinapril Group

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor quinapril and the cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent metoprolol on glycaemic control, with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) as the principal variable, in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients with hypertension.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study during 6 months preceded by a 4 week wash-out and a 3 week run-in placebo period. Quinapril (20 mg) and metoprolol (100 mg, conventional tablets) were given once daily. No change was made in the treatment of diabetes (diet and hypoglycaemic agents).

SUBJECTS

Seventy-two patients fulfilling the criteria were randomized and entered the double-blind period. Twelve patients did not complete the study. Sixty patients, 26 on quinapril and 34 on metoprolol, were available for the final analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The effect was assessed by changes in HbA1c, the fasting serum glucose and the post-load serum glucose, C-peptide and insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS

In the quinapril group, the fasting serum glucose, oral glucose tolerance and the C-peptide and insulin responses, determined as the incremental area under the curves (AUC), showed no change, but the mean HbA1c level increased from 6.2 +/- 1.1% to 6.5 +/- 1.3% (P < 0.05). In the metoprolol group, the rise in the mean level of HbA1c, from 6.3 +/- 1.0% to 6.8 +/- 1.3% (P < 0.01), tended to be more marked than after quinapril, although there was no significant difference between the increments. The mean fasting serum glucose showed an increase from 9.1 +/- 1.9 mM to 10.1 +/- 2.8 mM (P < 0.01) which correlated significantly with the duration of diabetes (P < 0.01) and the increase in fasting serum triglycerides (P < 0.001). Moreover, in the metoprolol group we found significant decreases in the oral glucose tolerance as well as C-peptide and insulin responses to the glucose load.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with quinapril for 6 months appears to have advantages over metoprolol in NIDDM patients with hypertension. Although treatment with quinapril or metoprolol over 6 months was concomitant with a rise in the HbA1c, increased fasting blood glucose, decreased oral glucose tolerance and decreased C-peptide and insulin responses to a glucose challenge were observed only in patients treated with metoprolol.

Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in essential hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Essential hypertension is characterized by an impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether antihypertensive treatment with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril can improve vasodilatation in response to endothelium-dependent agonists in essential hypertensive patients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied the effect of acute (6-8 h after dosing), prolonged (1 month) and chronic (12 months) lisinopril treatment on forearm blood flow response (strain-gauge plethysmography) induced in 10 hypertensive patients (aged 43.6 +/- 8.1 years, blood pressure 151.4 +/- 6.8/99.8 +/- 3.3 mmHg) by intrabrachial infusions of 0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 microg/100 ml per min acetylcholine and 5, 15, and 50 ng/100 ml per min bradykinin, two endothelium-dependent vasodilators, and 1, 2, and 4 microg/100 ml per min sodium nitroprusside, an endothelium-independent vasodilator. At baseline, vascular response was compared with that of 10 normotensive subjects (aged 42.4 +/- 6.6 years, blood pressure 118.4 +/- 6.1/77.8 +/- 3.4 mmHg).

RESULTS

Hypertensive patients had blunted (P < 0.01 or less) vasodilatations in response to infusions of acetylcholine (from 3.7 +/- 0.3 to 18.3 +/- 4.9 ml/100 ml per min) and bradykinin (from 3.7 +/- 0.4 to 15.8 +/- 2.6 ml/100 ml per min) compared with those of controls (from 3.6 +/- 0.3 to 25.3 +/- 5.2 ml/100 ml per min for acetylcholine and from 3.7 +/- 0.3 to 26.9 +/- 4.9 ml/100 ml per min for bradykinin) whereas the responses to infusion of sodium nitroprusside were similar (from 3.6 +/- 0.3 to 18.5 +/- 3.9 and from 3.6 +/- 0.3 to 16.4 +/- 1.8 ml/100 ml per min, respectively). Acute and prolonged lisinopril treatments significantly (P < 0.05 or less) improved vasodilatation in response to infusion of bradykinin (from 3.7 +/- 0.4 to 24.5 +/- 4.9 and from 3.7 +/- 0.3 to 22.1 +/- 4.9 ml/100 ml per min, respectively), but not in response to infusions of acetylcholine and of sodium nitroprusside. Chronic lisinopril treatment increased (P < 0.05) the response to infusions of not only bradykinin (from 3.5 +/- 0.5 to 27.6 +/- 5.3 ml/100 ml per min), but also of acetylcholine (from 3.5 +/- 0.5 to 27.8 +/- 8.0 ml/100 ml per min) and sodium nitroprusside (from 3.4 +/- 0.6 to 25.9 +/- 8.5 ml/100 ml per min). However, when the responses to infusions of acetylcholine and bradykinin were normalized with respect to that to infusion of sodium nitroprusside, only the vasodilatation in response to infusion of bradykinin was shown to have been increased by lisinopril treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of lisinopril to patients with essential hypertension can selectively increase vasodilatation in response to infusion of bradykinin.

The relationship between blood pressure and dementia: a review

Hypertension has been related to the development of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive dysfunction in middle-aged and elderly populations. One possible explanation is that hypertension is a risk factor for cerebral infarcts and ischaemic subcortical white-matter lesions. Hypertension may also give rise to a blood-brain barrier dysfunction, which has been suggested to be involved in the aetiology and pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Other possible explanations for the association are shared risk factors, such as psychological stress, and the formation of free oxygen radicals. Low blood pressure has also been hypothesized to give rise to brain damage and dementia. However, the brain is involved in blood pressure regulation and dementia disorders may therefore influence the blood pressure. The findings of an association between hypertension and dementia may have implications for prevention and treatment.

The Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) in hypertension--baseline data and current status

The Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) is an ongoing intervention study conducted in 11,019 hypertensive patients in Sweden and Finland. Patients have been randomized to receive either conventional antihypertensive therapy (diuretics and/or beta-blockers) or captopril-based treatment. A prospective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint evaluation (PROBE) study design is used to compare these two therapeutic regimens as regards cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The rationale for the CAPPP Study are the many observations of beneficial effects of ACE inhibition, as compared to diuretics and beta-blockers, on intermediary endpoints such as insulin sensitivity, serum lipoproteins, left ventricular hypertrophy and renal function. Captopril has also been shown to be markedly effective in the treatment of left ventricular dysfunction as well as congestive heart failure. The hypothesis is that these differences might result in improved risk reduction when ACE inhibitors are used in the treatment of hypertension. The present paper describes the baseline data and the changes in blood pressure during the first year in the total cohort. During the first year the average blood pressure was reduced by 11/8 mm Hg. A number of substudies have been conducted in the CAPPP Study. In one of these insulin sensitivity was compared in a subgroup of the patients using the euglycemic insulin clamp technique. In another substudy the ACE gene was sequenced and some new polymorphisms were discovered. Several other substudies are in progress or in the planning phase. The main results of the CAPPP Study should be available by mid-1998. Some of the intended anayses of the final results as well as other planned substudies are briefly described here.

Differences between the effects of metoprolol and prazosin on the forearm vasculature in primary hypertension

OBJECTIVES

To study the forearm vascular resistance in patients at rest and during ischaemia and cardiovascular responses to noradrenaline infusions during treatment with a beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist, metoprolol, and with an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin.

PATIENTS

Eighteen previously untreated primary hypertension patients were selected for therapy either with 50-250 mg/day metoprolol (n = 11) or with 3-20 mg/day prazosin (n = 8).

METHODS

The minimal vascular resistance after ischaemic work was calculated from the forearm blood flow determined by venous occlusion plethysmography before treatment and after two and 16 months of treatment Arterial and venous plasma noradrenaline levels were determined and systemic pressor responses and forearm vasoconstriction were studied during intravenous infusion of noradrenaline.

RESULTS

The resting mean arterial pressure was reduced differently by metoprolol and prazosin (by 20% versus by 8%; P < 0.001 for difference). The minimal vascular resistance decreased similarly after 16 months of metoprolol (17% decrease; P < 0.05) and of prazosin (24% decrease; P < 0.05) treatments. Arterial noradrenaline levels increased after 16 months of metoprolol treatment and after 2 and 16 months of prazosin treatment. The forearm noradrenaline spillover was reduced after 16 months on prazosin, but remained unchanged during metoprolol treatment. Pressor responses to intravenous noradrenaline were affected little by either treatment, whereas reflexogenic bradycardia was attenuated by prazosin treatment.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that metoprolol and prazosin treatments reduce the minimal vascular resistance similarly, despite different reductions in blood pressure. Prazosin treatment might also reduce the forearm sympathetic nerve activity. Reductions in minimal forearm vascular resistance during antihypertensive therapy need not be related only to the lowering of the blood pressure per se.

Circulating angiotensin converting enzyme levels are increased in concentric, but not eccentric, left ventricular hypertrophy in elderly men

OBJECTIVE

To study the cross-sectional relationship between circulating angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity and echocardiographically determined left ventricular geometry in a study of 380 70-year-old men participating in a health-survey reexamination and 50 patients with hypertension.

METHODS

Two-dimensional guided M-mode and Doppler echocardiography. Fluorometric assay of serum ACE activity.

RESULTS

The serum ACE activity was higher in the elderly men with left ventricular concentric hypertrophy than it was in men with normal geometry and left ventricular eccentric hypertrophy (32, 27, and 26 U/l, respectively, P < 0.01 for both comparisons before and after adjustment for the 24 h mean arterial pressure, body mass index, and use of antihypertensive medication). The serum ACE activity correlated with the thickness of the left ventricular interventricular septum (r = 0.12, P = 0.0095), the left ventricular relative wall thickness (r = 0.13, P = 0.0053 ), and the total peripheral resistance (r = 0.16, P = 0.0034), but not with the left ventricular mass (r = -0.039, P = 0.45) of these elderly men. The serum ACE activity in the hypertensive patients also correlated with the left ventricular interventricular septum thickness (r = 0.34, P = 0.020) independently of the 24 h mean arterial blood pressure, age, sex, body mass index, and insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Levels of serum ACE activity are associated with left ventricular geometry.

Effect of AT1 angiotensin-receptor blockade on structure and function of small arteries in SHR

The structure and function of small arteries of different vascular beds in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) are altered relative to Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) control rats, and these differences may be blunted under treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. To determine whether this effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was caused by the interruption of the renin-angiotensin system, our experiments were conducted with an AT1 angiotensin-receptor antagonist to evaluate its ability to induce regression of hypertrophy of resistance arteries in SHRs. The result of treatment of SHRs with losartan, an orally active selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist was examined at a low (20 mg/kg/day) and a high (60 mg/kg/day) oral dose in SHRs once blood pressure had been elevated for some time. SHRs were treated for 12 weeks with losartan. Blood pressure was significantly reduced by losartan treatment from 210 +/- 2 mm Hg in untreated SHRs to 181 +/- 1 mm Hg (low dose) and 156 +/- 4 mm Hg (high dose) (p < 0.01). Cardiac and aortic hypertrophy were dose-dependently reduced in treated SHRs. Coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral small arteries (luminal diameter, 200-250 microm) studied on an isometric wire myograph and pressurized mesenteric small arteries examined under isobaric conditions exhibited significant hypertrophy and inward remodeling in SHRs in comparison to WKY rats. Losartan treatment resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in the media thickness and mediato-lumen ratio in small arteries from the four vascular beds studied on the wire myograph and in pressurized mesenteric small arteries. Endothelium-dependent relaxation studied in pressurized arteries was enhanced, and acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent contractions studied on the wire myograph were abolished in losartan-treated SHRs relative to untreated SHRs. In WKY rats, treatment had no effect. These results demonstrate that treatment with the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan, even at doses that reduce blood pressure only moderately, induces regression of cardiovascular hypertrophy and of endothelial dysfunction in genetic hypertension in the rat.

How to assess vascular remodelling in small and medium-sized muscular arteries in humans

The study of vascular wall changes in humans has generated great interest with the increasing realization that, independently of the potential contribution to mechanisms involved in blood pressure elevation, these structural alterations (remodelling) or functional changes may contribute to the complications of elevated blood pressure. Moreover, some of these changes may be corrected partially or totally by administration of antihypertensive agents and other drugs. This has fuelled interest in the techniques used to evaluate changes in the vascular wall in humans, which are reviewed critically here with a focus on human studies in hypertension. Remodelling of large and small arteries has different characteristics, and is studies with different techniques. In hypertensive patients, small arteries less than 400 microns in diameter exhibit a reduction in lumen diameter, accompanied sometimes but not always by an increase in media width or in media cross-section. The study of capillaries and small arteries of the skin or the eye can be performed non-invasively, but for the sake of obtaining the information of interest in hypertension, at present invasive techniques are required to investigate small arteries. These consist of a biopsy of subcutaneous tissue, usually from the gluteal region, and the study of vessels after they have been mounted on a 'wire myograph' or on a pressurized system. In contrast to small arteries, large arteries from hypertensive humans present increases in media width without a significant reduction in the lumen diameter (when studied under conditions isobaric relative to those in normotensive subjects). Conduit arteries may be studies non-invasively with the use of ultrasound techniques. The study of large elastic arteries is not addressed here. The use of echo-tracking devices to study muscular medium-sized arteries such as the radial artery is described. The relative advantages and disadvantages of these techniques, the questions which may be asked and the relevance of the information obtained using these approaches are discussed.

Effects of long-term antihypertensive treatment with lisinopril on resistance arteries in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of long-term antihypertensive therapy with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on structural alterations and the endothelial function of small resistance arteries in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with left ventricular hypertrophy were treated for 3 years with a lisinopril-based regimen. Patients underwent an echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular mass index at baseline, during the first and third years of treatment. At the end of the treatment period, subcutaneous small resistance arteries (obtained by biopsy of the subcutaneous fat from the gluteal region) were dissected and mounted on a micromyograph (Mulvany's technique); the media : lumen ratio was then calculated. Data obtained were compared with those observed for 14 untreated essential hypertensive patients and 14 normotensive subjects, age- and sex-matched.

RESULTS

In the present study, a significantly lower media : lumen ratio was observed in treated compared with untreated hypertensive patients, although it remained significantly higher than that in normotensive subjects. In treated hypertensive patients a significant reduction in clinic blood pressure was observed. However, their blood pressure remained significantly higher than that in normotensive subjects. Significant correlations between the media : lumen ratio and blood pressure, left ventricular mass index or changes in left ventricular mass index during treatment were observed. The response to acetylcholine administration was reduced in untreated hypertensives compared with that in normotensives. In patients treated with lisinopril, the vasodilatation obtained with the two higher doses of acetylcholine was greater than that in untreated hypertensives, thus suggesting an improvement of endothelial function.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term therapy based on lisinopril was associated with a smaller media : lumen ratio in the subcutaneous small resistance arteries of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Our retrospective study confirms previous findings obtained in prospective studies with other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Endothelial function was probably improved by lisinopril therapy.

Enhanced expression of endothelin-1 gene in resistance arteries in severe human essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

Endothelins are potent vasoconstrictors, and may also act as mitogens and hypertrophic agents. Expression of a member of this family of peptides, endothelin-1, is enhanced in the endothelium of blood vessels of rats with severe forms of hypertension, even in the absence of elevated plasma endothelin levels. In some of these hypertensive models enhanced endothelin-1 gene expression may contribute to vascular hypertrophy of small arteries and to elevation of blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether endothelin-1 may play a role in essential hypertension in humans, in whom plasma levels are known to be usually within normal limits, by examining the expression of the endothelin-1 gene in resistance-size arteries of normotensive subjects, and in humans with mild and severe hypertension.

METHODS

Using in-situ hybridization, the abundance of endothelin-1 messenger RNA transcripts was evaluated in small arteries of subcutaneous gluteal fat obtained by biopsy in normotensive and hypertensive patients.

RESULTS

Vessels from five normotensive subjects and four untreated mild essential hypertensive patients did not exhibit topographically localized specific labeling with the antisense human endothelin-1 probe. Biopsies from four untreated hypertensive patients with moderate-to-severe blood pressure elevation, in contrast, showed a heavy density of grains on endothelial cells of small arteries of gluteal subcutaneous fat, corresponding to hybridization of the antisense human endothelin-1 complementary RNA probe with endothelin-1 messenger RNA.

CONCLUSION

Some patients with moderate-to-severe essential hypertension, similar to some experimental rat models with severe blood pressure elevation, exhibit enhanced endothelial expression of the endothelin-1 gene. This is the first demonstration that overexpression of the endothelin-1 gene may occur in the vascular wall in a small sample of this subset of hypertensive patients. This pathophysiologic phenomenon could play a role in blood pressure elevation and perhaps in the pathogenesis of vascular hypertrophy. Treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists may offer a novel therapy for these moderate-to-severe hypertensive patients.

Smooth muscle apoptosis during vascular regression in spontaneously hypertensive rats

We previously reported that apoptosis is increased in smooth muscle cells cultured from the aorta of spontaneously hypertensive rats versus normotensive controls. As an initial in vivo exploration, we now examined smooth muscle cell apoptosis regulation during the regression of vascular hypertrophy in the thoracic aorta media of spontaneously hypertensive rats receiving the antihypertensive drug enalapril (30 mg.kg-1.d-1), losartan (30 mg.kg-1.d-1), nifedipine (35 mg.kg-1.d-1), hydralazine (40 mg.kg-1.d-1), propranolol (50 mg.kg-1.d-1), or hydrochlorothiazide (75 mg.kg-1.d-1) for 1 to 4 weeks starting at 10 to 11 weeks of age. Three criteria were used to evaluate smooth muscle cell apoptosis: (1) oligonucleosomal fragmentation of the extracted aortic DNA, (2) reduction in aortic DNA content, and (3) depletion of smooth muscle cells in the arterial media. Arterial DNA synthesis was evaluated by [3H]thymidine incorporation in vivo. After 4 weeks of treatment, systolic blood pressure was reduced significantly by > 42% with losartan, enalapril, and hydralazine, and by 23% with nifedipine, versus control values of 220 +/- 5 mm Hg. However these agents affected vascular growth and apoptosis differently. Losartan, enalapril, and nifedipine stimulated smooth muscle cell apoptosis threefold to fivefold before there was a significant reduction in DNA synthesis (> 25%), vascular mass (> 19%), or vascular DNA content (> 38%), and these treatments markedly reduced (by 38% to 50%) medial cell number as measured at 4 weeks by the three-dimensional disector method. Losartan and nifedipine stimulated smooth muscle cell apoptosis before reducing blood pressure. In contrast, hydralazine did not affect vascular mass, apoptosis, or DNA synthesis, although blood pressure was lowered. Propranolol or hydrochlorothiazide failed to affect hypertension or vascular growth. Thus, smooth muscle cell apoptosis represents a novel therapeutic target for the control of hypertensive vessel remodeling in response to therapeutic agents.

The renin-angiotensin system and vascular hypertrophy

In addition to its vasoconstrictor and aldosterone-stimulating action, angiotensin II also drives cell growth and replication in the cardiovascular system, which may result in myocardial hypertrophy and hypertrophy or hyperplasia of conduit and resistance vessels in certain subjects. These actions are mediated through angiotensin II receptors (subtype AT1), which activate the G protein, phospholipase C, diacylglycerol and inositol trisphosphate pathway, to increase the expression of certain protooncogenes (c-fos, c-myc and c-jun) and growth factors (platelet-derived growth factor-A-chain, transforming growth factor-beta 1 and basic fibroblast growth factor). The cellular responses to angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle have been shown in different hypertensive vessels to be either hypertrophy alone, hypertrophy and DNA synthesis without cell division (polyploidy) or DNA synthesis with cell division (hyperplasia). In genetic hypertension, the altered structure of small arteries is due to either cellular hyperplasia or remodeling, whereas in renovascular hypertension there is hypertrophy of vascular smooth muscle cells. Angiotensin II also increases synthesis of some matrix components, activates blood monocytes and is thrombogenic. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors prevent or reverse vascular hypertrophy in animal models of hypertension; this seems to be a class effect, shared to some extent with calcium channel blocking agents. In human hypertension, ACE inhibitors reduce the increased media/lumen ratio of large and small arteries in hypertension and increase arterial compliance. These properties are also shared by losartan, the first of the new class of angiotensin II receptor (AT1) antagonists. The clinical implications of these findings need to be tested through rigorous and prospective clinical trials.

Effect of calcium channel blockade or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on structure of coronary, renal, and other small arteries in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and Wistar-Kyoto control rats (WKY) were treated for 14 weeks with a novel calcium channel blocker, mibefradil (Ro40-5967), or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, cilazapril. Blood pressure was significantly reduced by treatment in SHRs from > 200 mm Hg to 155 +/- 2 mm Hg by mibefradil and to 138 +/- 1 mm Hg by cilazapril (p < 0.01). Cardiac hypertrophy was significantly reduced by treatment but to a greater degree with cilazapril than with mibefradil. Conduit and large arteries also had significant regression of hypertrophy. Small arteries (luminal diameter, 200-300 microns) of the coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral circulations exhibited significant hypertrophy and remodeling in SHRs in comparison to WKYs. Cilazapril treatment resulted in increased lumen, reduced media thickness, and media-to-lumen ratio in all four vascular beds. Mibefradil treatment induced regression of luminal diameter to a significant degree only in the mesenteric and femoral small arteries but decreased media thickness and media to lumen diameter in all four vascular beds. The greater extent of regression of cardiac and vascular hypertrophy and remodeling with cilazapril than with mibefradil may relate to the degree of blood pressure reduction, which, with the doses used, was larger with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor than with the calcium channel blocker. In WKY rats, treatment had no effect except with cilazapril on lumen diameter of small arteries and with mibefradil on heart weight, both of which increased. These results demonstrate the blood-pressure dependence of regression of cardiovascular hypertrophy and remodeling and the possibility of achieving "reverse remodeling" of large and small arteries with converting enzyme inhibition or calcium channel blockade in SHRs, as well as the near absence of effects of these agents on cardiovascular characteristics in WKYs.

Cardiovascular structural alterations in hypertension: effect of treatment

Available data support the hypothesis that antihypertensive drugs may determine a significant regression of cardiac and vascular structural changes. Antihypertensive drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin or, to a lesser extent, the adrenergic system may more consistently and promptly reduce left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and vascular structural changes. It is possible that all antihypertensive agents, when used for long enough periods, will reduce LV mass, whereas only certain drugs will reduce mass within a period of few months, so that any difference among classes of antihypertensive drugs is more quantitative than absolute. However, a rapid reversal of LVH may be particularly important because reducing blood pressure in the presence of an elevated LV mass may be associated with impairment of coronary perfusion. Structural changes of small resistance arteries play a significant role in the genesis of increased vascular resistance in hypertension and in the maintainance of high blood pressure values. Studies in humans have demonstrated that minimal vascular resistance can be reduced with the use of different antihypertensive drugs, while a complete normalization of the media: lumen ratio was observed only with ACE inhibitors. Further studies are needed to assess the true clinical impact, in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality of reversal of cardiovascular structural changes in hypertensive patients. However, available studies indicate that reversal of LVH reduces the pathological consequences of increased left ventricular mass, and preliminary data suggest that complete regression of LVH may be associated to a decreased risk for cardiovascular events.

Correction of remodeling and function of small arteries in human hypertension by cilazapril, an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor

Angiotensin II may contribute to the altered structure and function of small arteries. We proposed that angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment could induce a regression of vascular remodeling. A double-blind trial was performed comparing effects of the ACE inhibitor cilazapril with the beta-blocker atenolol on small arteries obtained from biopsy specimens of subcutaneous gluteal fat. Nine patients with essential hypertension were randomized to cilazapril and eight to atenolol. Blood pressure was below 140/95 mm Hg under treatment for the duration of the study in all patients. Media-to-lumen ratio of small arteries of the patients, which before treatment was significantly higher than in normotensive subjects, was corrected after 1 year of treatment in the cilazapril group. There was no change in the increased media-to-lumen ratio of small arteries in the atenolol group, even after 2 years of treatment. Attenuated constrictor responses to endothelin-1 returned to normal only in the patients treated with cilazapril. Endothelium-dependent relaxation responses to acetylcholine were slightly depressed in hypertensive patients and improved in the cilazapril-treated group, but remained blunted in the arteries of the atenolol-treated patients. Treatment with cilazapril corrects small artery remodeling and endothelium-related functional abnormalities of gluteal subcutaneous small arteries in hypertensive patients. It remains to be demonstrated whether these apparently beneficial effects translate into reduced morbidity and mortality in hypertension.