Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation

Primary total hip arthroplasty revision due to dislocation: prospective French multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) may require surgical revision, and is one of the most frequent causes for revision in national registers. The goals of this study were to determine the characteristics of revision THA for dislocation and identify the typical features of hips revised due to dislocation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective multicenter study (30 centers) was performed in first revision THA performed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011 (multiple revisions were excluded).

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen (10.4%) of all first revisions (2153 cases in 2107 patients) were for dislocation, which was the fifth cause of revision. There were 135 men and 84 women, mean age 65.9 years old (24.3-92.4) at primary THA and 72.9 years old (31.9-98.8) at revision. Revision surgery was performed a mean 7.1 years (± 7.1) after primary THA. The predictive risk factors for dislocation were: a 22.2mm diameter femoral head (risk × 2.4), a posterolateral approach (risk × 1.7), older age (risk × 1.1), an elevated rim liner for primary THA (risk × 6.6). The use of a dual mobility cup did not influence the rate of revision for dislocation (8.8%) compared to the use of a flat rim liner (9.1%).

DISCUSSION

The 10.4% rate of revision of THA for dislocation seems markedly lower than the results in the literature both for frequency and ranking. The use of elevated rim or constrained liners designed to decrease the risk of dislocation does not improve results compared to standard liners.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prospective prognostic study without a control group.

Computerized range of motion analysis following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty, traditional total hip arthroplasty, and hip resurfacing

Newer arthroplasty designs claim to provide superior range of motion (ROM) and greater stability than their predecessors. However, there is no way to compare ROM of implant systems in an equivalent anatomical environment in a clinical setting. This study used computer-aided design to compare ROM after hip resurfacing, 28 mm THA, 36 mm THA, and anatomic dual mobility (ADM) THA in 3D models of 5 cadaver pelvises. ROM to impingement was then tested in 10 different motions and a one-way ANOVA was used to compare results. The hip resurfacing resulted in restricted ROM compared to the other 3 models in all motions except adduction. The ADM, 36 mm, and 28 mm THA resulted in similar ROM. Dual mobility constructs provide comparable ROM in patients where large head THA is not appropriate.

Dual mobility cups for preventing early hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients at risk: experience in a county hospital

Dislocation remains a major concern after hip arthroplasty. We asked whether dual mobility cups (DMC) would improve early hip stability in patients with high risk of dislocation. We followed 34 patients (21 females, 13 males) treated between 2009 and 2012 with cemented DMC for hip revisions caused recurrent hip prosthetic dislocation or as a primary procedure in patients with high risk of instability. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated using Harris Hip Score and EQ-5D respectively. We found that the cemented DMC gave stability in 94%. Seven patients (20%) were re-operated due to infection. One patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture. At follow-up (6 to 36 months, mean 18), the mean Harris hip score was 67 (standard deviation: 14) and mean EQ-5D was 0.76 (standard deviation: 0.12). We concluded that treating patients with high risk of dislocation with DMC can give good stability. However, complications such as postoperative infection can be frequent and should be managed carefully.

Cementation of a dual-mobility acetabular component into a well-fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical validation

Cementation of polyethylene (PE) liners into well-fixed metal shells has become a popular option during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) particularly for older and frail patients. Although dramatic results were reported with dual-mobility acetabular components to manage hip instability during revision THA, no study evaluated the fixation strength of the cementation of dual-mobility components into well-fixed metal shells. Eight dual-mobility and eight all-PE components were cemented into a metal shell with a uniform 2- to 3-mm cement mantle. The cemented fixation strength was evaluated using lever-out and torsion testing. The interface at which failure occurred was determined. Lever-out testing showed that dual-mobility components failed at significantly higher maximum moment than the all-PE components. No direct comparison could be performed with torsion testing due to early failure of the all-PE component itself before failure of the cement fixation. However, the maximum moments measured were dramatically higher than the in vivo frictional moments classically reported in THA. In addition, failure was always observed at the metal shell/cement interface whenever it did occur. In conclusion, a dual-mobility acetabular component cemented into a well-fixed metal shell could constitute a biomechanically acceptable alternative to acetabular shell removal or PE liner cementation while simultaneously preventing instability of the THA revision. Clinical studies are warranted.

Is a cementless dual mobility socket in primary THA a reasonable option?

BACKGROUND

Dislocation after THA continues to be relatively common. Dual mobility sockets have been associated with low dislocation rates, but it remains unclear whether their use in primary THA would not introduce additional complications.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore asked whether a current cementless dual mobility socket (1) reduced the dislocation rate after primary THA, (2) provided a pain-free and mobile hip, and (3) provided durable radiographic fixation of the acetabular component without any unique modes of failure.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 168 patients who underwent primary THA using a dual mobility socket between January 2000 and June 2002. The average age at surgery was 67 years. We assessed the rate of dislocation, hip function, and acetabular fixation on serial radiographs. Of the 168 patients, 119 (71%) had clinical and radiographic evaluation at a minimum of 5 years (mean, 6 years; range, 5-8 years).

RESULTS

A long-neck option left the base of the Morse taper uncovered in 53 hips. Four patients underwent revision for dislocation between the femoral head and the mobile insert (intraprosthetic dislocation) at a mean 6 years; all four revisions occurred among the 53 hips with an incompletely covered Morse taper.

CONCLUSIONS

A current cementless dual mobility socket was associated with a pain-free and mobile hip and durable acetabular fixation without dislocations if the long-neck option was not used. However, intraprosthetic dislocation related to contact at the femoral neck to mobile insert articulation required revision in four hips. Surgeons should be aware of this specific complication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years

BACKGROUND

Dual mobility (DM) cups of mobile polyethylene were introduced to prevent total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation, but no large series with this design to treat recurrent instability have been reported.

PURPOSE

Our retrospective investigation ascertained the efficiency of DM cups in correction of recurrent dislocation and assessed any adverse effects.

METHODS

One hundred eighty THAs with recurrent instability were revised to DM cups in 180 patients (mean age, 67.4 ± 11.7 years; range, 19 to 92 years). Thirty-one patients (17.2%) underwent at least one earlier THA revision, and 15 (10.3%) incurred non-union of the greater trochanter. Of the initial group in 2009, 145 patients had completed evaluations which included assessment of the Harris Hip Score and a radiographic assessment at a mean follow-up of 7.7 ± 2.2 years (range, 4 to 14 years). The rate of survival was calculated considering any reason for revision as failure.

RESULTS

At follow-up, Harris hip score was 83.9 ± 16.1 (range, 21 to 100). Dislocation of the large articulation occurred in seven hips (4.8%), and only two recurred (1.4%) (one requiring additional revision). In addition, two intra-prosthetic dislocations of the small articulation (1.4%) were observed and needed revision surgery. The large number of earlier surgeries and non-union of the greater trochanter were related to recurrent instability. Two cups (1.4%) showed signs of definite loosening; six (4.1%) presented signs of possible loosening. Twenty-nine hips manifested femoral or acetabular osteolysis (20%), but only three were severe. Eight-year survival rate considering revision for any reason was 92.6% (95% CI, 85.5-96.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This series indicates that DM cups are a viable option to treat recurrent THA instability. Their design provides a low risk of recurrent instability without increasing mechanical complications.

Instability after total hip arthroplasty

Instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an unfortunately frequent and serious problem that requires thorough evaluation and preoperative planning before surgical intervention. Prevention through optimal index surgery is of great importance, as the management of an unstable THA is challenging even for an experienced joints surgeon. However, even after well-planned surgery, a significant incidence of recurrent instability still exists. Non-operative management is often successful if the components are well-fixed and correctly positioned in the absence of neurocognitive disorders. If conservative management fails, surgical options include revision of malpositioned components; exchange of modular components such as the femoral head and acetabular liner; bipolar arthroplasty; tripolar arthroplasty; use of a larger femoral head; use of a constrained liner; soft tissue reinforcement and advancement of the greater trochanter.

Dual-mobility bearings: a review of the literature

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty remains a major problem and hip instability is the most common reason for revision. These complications are costly to both patients and the healthcare system, and efforts to reduce them have had varied degrees of success. Although there are well documented patient and surgical risk factors for dislocation, the typical surgical solutions offered (constrained liners, large femoral heads) have the drawbacks of reduced range-of-motion and high rates of revision. Dual-mobility prostheses (unconstrained tripolar prostheses) are hip design solutions to dislocation that aim to provide a greater stability with an increased range-of-motion, along with potentially reduced wear. The mean overall dislocation rate from multiple combined studies using dual-mobility prostheses was 0.1% for primary total hip arthroplasty and 3.5% for revisions, compared with 2-7% for standard primary total hip arthroplasties and up to 16% for revisions. Dual-mobility prostheses offer a viable option for treating recurrent dislocation as well as for primary and revision arthroplasty.

The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement

We present our experience with a double-mobility acetabular component in 155 consecutive revision total hip replacements in 149 patients undertaken between 2005 and 2009, with particular emphasis on the incidence of further dislocation. The mean age of the patients was 77 years (42 to 89) with 59 males and 90 females. In all, five patients died and seven were lost to follow-up. Indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 113 hips, recurrent instability in 29, peri-prosthetic fracture in 11 and sepsis in two. The mean follow-up was 42 months (18 to 68). Three hips (2%) in three patients dislocated within six weeks of surgery; one of these dislocated again after one year. All three were managed successfully with closed reduction. Two of the three dislocations occurred in patients who had undergone revision for recurrent dislocation. All three were found at revision to have abductor deficiency. There were no dislocations in those revised for either aseptic loosening or sepsis.

These results demonstrate a good mid-term outcome for this component. In the 29 patients revised for instability, only two had a further dislocation, both of which were managed by closed reduction.

Dual poly liner mobility optimizes wear and stability in THA: affirms

A dual-mobility acetabular component consists of a large, fixed, porous-coated acetabular component and a bipolar femoral component. These components are often called tripolar components. This configuration provides a stable, well-fixed implant platform against bone and 2 articular interfaces, a large polyethylene surface directly apposed to a highly polished metal implant, and a standard-sized (28- or 32-mm) femoral head captured within polyethylene. The dual-mobility cup appears to offer a safe, effective, durable solution to hip instability. The concept has extensive laboratory and clinical support. Although the long-term durability of these implants is unknown, the tested wear rates of a dual-mobility design with the current generation of highly cross-linked polyethylene are significantly lower than any previously reported wear rates. The recently introduced modular dual-mobility shell offers surgeons substantial flexibility in addressing the issue of hip instability with a cost-efficient, familiar option.

Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips

PURPOSE

The longest follow-up dual mobility series from inventor Gilles Bousquet focussing on implant survival and the incidence of dislocation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study from 1985 to 1990, on 240 hips using a PF® modular femoral stem and a dual mobility Novae® tripodal socket (SERF).

RESULTS

The 22-year follow-up global survival rate was 74%. No dislocation occurred, 41 hips were revised, including ten retentive failures (RF), 12 hips were lost to follow-up, 87 patients (99 hips) died without revision, and 90 hips were still in situ.

CONCLUSION

The dual mobility socket global survival rate is comparable to similar series. The 0% dislocation rate demonstrates the success of dual mobility with regard to implant stability. The main issues were cup fixation, which might be improved by the use of macrostructures and HA coating, and osteolytic lesions, caused by polyethylene wear. Traditionally suitable for patients older than 60 years, dual mobility might be extended for use in patients over 50.

The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases

Long-term results of a retrospective series of primary arthroplasty with the original cementless dual mobility socket (A) and the midterm results with the second generation (B) are reported. In series A (follow-up 16.5 years) 437 total hip arthroplasties (THA) were included and in series B (follow-up five years) 231 hips. The 15-year survival rate was 84.4 ± 4.5% (revision for any reason as endpoint); 30 hips (6.8%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Five THA were revised for dislocation: two early and three after ten years or more. With the second generation socket neither dislocation nor revision for mechanical reasons were observed. The survival rate was 99.6 ± 0.4% (revision for any reason). The prevalence of revision for dislocation was very low in our series. This concept does not avoid wear and aseptic loosening, especially in young active patients, but the long-term stability has been confirmed. Dual mobility can be recommended for patients over 70 years of age and for younger patients with high risk of dislocation.

The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation

BACKGROUND

The treatment of recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty remains challenging. Dual mobility sockets have been associated with a low rate of dislocation but it is not known whether they are useful for treating recurrent dislocation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore asked whether a cemented dual mobility socket would (1) restore hip stability following recurrent dislocation; (2) provide a pain-free and mobile hip; and (3) show durable radiographic fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients treated with a cemented dual mobility socket for recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty between August 2002 and June 2005. The mean age at the time of the index procedure of was 71.3 years. Of the 51 patients, 47 have had complete clinical and radiographic evaluation data at a mean followup of 51.4 months (range, 25-76.3 months).

RESULTS

The cemented dual mobility socket restored complete stability of the hip in 45 of the 47 patients (96%). The mean Merle d'Aubigné hip score was 16 ± 2 at the latest followup. Radiographic analysis revealed no or radiolucent lines less than 1 mm thick located in a single acetabular zone in 43 of 47 hips (91.5%). The cumulative survival rate of the acetabular component at 72 months using revision for dislocation and/or mechanical failure as the end point was 96% ± 4% (95% confidence interval, 90%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

A cemented dual mobility socket was able to restore hip stability in 96% of recurrent dislocating hips. However, longer-term followup is needed to ensure that dislocation and loosening rates will not increase.

Dual mobility hip arthroplasty wear measurement: Experimental accuracy assessment using radiostereometric analysis (RSA)

INTRODUCTION

The use of dual mobility cups is an effective method to prevent dislocations. However, the specific design of these implants can raise the suspicion of increased wear and subsequent periprosthetic osteolysis.

HYPOTHESIS

Using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), migration of the femoral head inside the cup of a dual mobility implant can be defined to apprehend polyethylene wear rate.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to establish the precision of RSA measurement of femoral head migration in the cup of a dual mobility implant, and its intra- and interobserver variability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total hip prosthesis phantom was implanted and placed under weight loading conditions in a simulator. Model-based RSA measurement of implant penetration involved specially machined polyethylene liners with increasing concentric wear (no wear, then 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75mm). Three examiners, blinded to the level of wear, analyzed (10 times) the radiostereometric films of the four liners. There was one experienced, one trained, and one inexperienced examiner. Statistical analysis measured the accuracy, precision, and intra- and interobserver variability by calculating Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), Intra Class correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Our protocol, that used a simple geometric model rather than the manufacturer's CAD files, showed precision of 0.072mm and accuracy of 0.034mm, comparable with machining tolerances with low variability. Correlation between wear measurement and true value was excellent with a CCC of 0.9772. Intraobserver reproducibility was very good with an ICC of 0.9856, 0.9883 and 0.9842, respectively for examiners 1, 2 and 3. Interobserver reproducibility was excellent with a CCC of 0.9818 between examiners 2 and 1, and 0.9713 between examiners 3 and 1.

DISCUSSION

Quantification of wear is indispensable for the surveillance of dual mobility implants. This in vitro study validates our measurement method. Our results, and comparison with other studies using different measurement technologies (RSA, standard radiographs, Martell method) make model-based RSA the reference method for measuring the wear of total hip prostheses in vivo.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3. Prospective diagnostic study.

Dual mobility for chronic hip instability: a solution option

A dual-mobility acetabular component consists of a large, fixed, porous-coated acetabular component and a bipolar femoral component. These components are often called tripolar components. This configuration provides a stable, well-fixed implant platform against bone and 2 articular interfaces, a large polyethylene surface directly apposed to the highly polished metal shell, and a standard sized (28 mm, 32 mm) femoral head captured within polyethylene. The dual-mobility cup was designed to reduce the incidence of dislocations in patients at increased risk of instability (eg, patients undergoing revision). The cup appears to offer a safe, effective, durable solution to hip instability. The concept has extensive laboratory and clinical support. Although the long-term durability of dual-mobility cups, particularly in young, active, large patients, is not known, the tested wear rates of the dual-mobility design with the current generation of highly cross-linked polyethylene are significantly lower than any previously reported wear rates. The recently released anatomic dual-mobility cup seeks to reduce the potential for iliopsoas impingement while retaining the stability and wear characteristics of the original dual-mobility design.

Dual mobility design use in preventing total hip replacement dislocation following tumor resection

INTRODUCTION

Total hip replacement (THR) following hip tumor resection incurs a high risk of dislocation. We assessed the incidence of dislocation associated with use of a dual mobility cup,and the functional results achieved.

HYPOTHESIS

Use of a dual mobility cup would reduce the risk of THR instability following hip tumor resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed dislocation rates in a retrospective series of 71 dual mobility cup THRs implanted following the resection of a tumor hip condition: 33 primary bone tumors and 38 bone metastases. The presenting pathology was diagnosed anatomically, and surgery classified in terms of adopted abductor system strategy. Functional results were assessed in terms of pain (analgesia on the World Health Organisation [WHO] scale), assisted walking and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.

RESULTS

An overall rate of 9.8% dislocation was observed, taking into account all etiologies and contexts together. More precisely, this rate resulted from a compound figure of 5.2% in bone metastasis and 15% in primitive bone tumor. Dislocation risk depended lesson etiology than on the surgical management of the abductor system, being 3.5% in the case of abductor conservation, 9.5% in the case of abductor sectioning/reinsertion, and 18%in case of gluteus medius muscle or nerve resection. Functional improvement was consistently observed, especially in bone metastasis. At the maximal follow-up, 32 patients were not using analgesics, six were taking WHO class III analgesics, 10 class II and 23 class I. Mean MSTS score was 68.1% +/- 23.5% in bone metastasis and 59.6% +/- 17.5% in primary bone tumor.Fourteen patients could walk without assistance, 33 with a single cane, 15 with two canes and eight with a walker; one patient had not been able to resume walking.

DISCUSSION

In these indications, dual mobility cups use lead to lower dislocation rates than those reported in the literature. It proved especially effective in the case of bone metastasis and consolidation surgery. In the case of primary bone tumor, it failed to prevent dislocation following acetabular resection, especially when involving the abductor muscles and/or abductor innervation, although it provided lower dislocation rates, comparable to those experienced with other techniques, when applied to limited resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV. Retrospective therapeutic study.

High failure rate of the Duraloc Constrained Inlay

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

After total hip arthroplasty, dislocations are a frequent complication and are difficult to treat in some patients. A great variety of implants and antiluxation mechanisms are used in surgical therapy.

METHODS

8 patients had 9 Duraloc Constrained Inlays implanted at our clinic between October 2003 and November 2006, for recurrent dislocations. A retrospective follow-up study was carried out.

RESULTS

All patients suffered a failure of the expanding ring, the metal ring being squeezed out of the polyethylene notch. The mechanism of failure can be explained by impingement due to the implant design. At the time of writing, 3 patients have had to undergo revision surgery.

INTERPRETATION

The Duraloc Constrained Inlay has shown unacceptably high failure rates.

Anatomic and physiologic rationale for various technologies for primary total hip arthroplasty

A number of patients have anatomic or physiologic variations that may adversely affect the performance of a primary total hip arthroplasty. Various technologies have been utilized in an attempt to improve the outcomes for these patients; however, some of these potential solutions are controversial. The authors examined the complete body of literature for scientific evidence regarding the use of these new technologies. The anatomic and physiologic anomalies that were studied include extra-articular deformities, developmental dysplasia, Perthes disease, Type C femoral bone, acetabular bone deficiency, femoral rotational abnormalities, variations that increase the risk of hip dislocation, sickle cell anemia, and extremely small or large bone sizes. This article presents the current scientific evidence and imparts an unbiased view of the use of various technologies to provide individualized solutions for patients who have anatomic or physiologic variations.

Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability

Unconstrained tripolar hip implants provide an additional bearing using a mobile polyethylene component between the prosthetic head and the outer metal shell. Such a design increases the effective head diameter and therefore is an attractive option in challenging situations of unstable total hip arthroplasties. We report our experience with 54 patients treated using this dual mobility implant in such situations. We ascertained its ability to restore and maintain stability, and examined component loosening and component failure. At a minimum followup of 2.2 years (mean, 4 years; range, 2.2-6.8 years), one hip had redislocated 2 months postoperatively and was managed successfully without reoperation by closed reduction with no additional dislocation. Two patients required revision of the implant because of dislocation at the inner bearing. Technical errors were responsible for these failures. Three patients had reoperations for deep infections. The postoperative radiographs at latest followup showed very satisfactory osseointegration of the acetabular component because no radiolucent line or osteolysis was reported. Use of this unconstrained tripolar design was successful in restoring and maintaining hip stability. We observed encouraging results at short-term followup regarding potential for loosening or mechanical failures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.