Effect of Tibial Posterior Slope on Knee Kinematics, Quadriceps Force, and Patellofemoral Contact Force After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

How exactly can computer simulation predict the kinematics and contact status after TKA? Examination in individualized models

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether a computer simulation with simple models can estimate individual in vivo knee kinematics, although some complex models have predicted the knee kinematics. The purposes of this study are first, to validate the accuracy of the computer simulation with our developed model during a squatting activity in a weight-bearing deep knee bend and then, to analyze the contact area and the contact stress of the tri-condylar implants for individual patients.

METHODS

We compared the anteroposterior (AP) contact positions of medial and lateral condyles calculated by the computer simulation program with the positions measured from the fluoroscopic analysis for three implanted knees. Then the contact area and the stress including the third condyle were calculated individually using finite element (FE) analysis.

FINDINGS

The motion patterns were similar in the simulation program and the fluoroscopic surveillance. Our developed model could nearly estimate the individual in vivo knee kinematics. The mean and maximum differences of the AP contact positions were 1.0mm and 2.5mm, respectively. At 120° of knee flexion, the contact area at the third condyle was wider than the both condyles. The mean maximum contact stress at the third condyle was lower than the both condyles at 90° and 120° of knee flexion.

INTERPRETATION

Individual bone models are required to estimate in vivo knee kinematics in our simple model. The tri-condylar implant seems to be safe for deep flexion activities due to the wide contact area and low contact stress.