Visceral pleural invasion remains a size-independent prognostic factor in stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Extent of Visceral Pleural Invasion Affects Prognosis of Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A meta-analysis

Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) has been known to be an adverse prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic significance of extent of VPI (PL0, PL1 and PL2) remains controversial. We conduct a meta-analysis to summarize available evidence on this topic. PubMed, EMBASE, OVID and The Cochrane Library were searched for published studies from inception to May 9, 2016. A total of 16 studies were included in meta-analysis. Our results showed that patients with PL1 or PL2 had poorer overall survival compared with PL0 (HR = 1.555, 95% CI 1.399, 1.730; HR = 2.447, 95% CI 1.913, 3.130) and patients with PL2 had even poorer overall survival than PL1 (HR = 1.287, 95% CI 1.114, 1.487). Patients with PL1 or PL2 had lower 5-year survival rate than PL0 patients (OR = 0.515, 95% CI 0.415, 0.640; OR = 0.441, 95% CI 0.336, 0.579) and patients with PL2 had even lower 5-year survival rate than PL1 (OR = 0.706, 95% CI 0.545, 0.915). In conclusion, extent of VPI impacts the prognosis of resected NSCLC and VPI should be categorized as PL1 and PL2 in the terms of clinical practice and trials.

Visceral pleural invasion predict a poor survival among lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤ 3cm

INTRODUCTION

The impact of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) on survival remains controversial for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the survival status of VPI among patients with lymph node-negative lung invasive adenocarcinoma smaller than 3cm.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2537 consecutive patients with pathologic stage I lung invasive adenocarcinoma. All patients had received lobectomy and system lymph nodes resection. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to tumor size and visceral pleural invasion status. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to evaluate survival difference between these groups.

RESULTS

548 patients with VPI while 1989 patients without VPI were included in this study. For patients with tumor size ≤2cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR,4.85; 95% CI, 2.98-7.91; p = .000) and OS(HR,3.52; 95% CI, 1.59-7.78; p = .002) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with tumor size between 2-3cm, patients with VPI had significant worse DFS (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.55; p = .006) but no significant OS (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.76-2.24; p = .330) compared with non-VPI group. For patients with VPI, there were no survival difference between tumor size 2-3cm group and ≤2cm group for both DFS(HR,1.02; 95% CI, 0.65-1.61; p = .939) and OS(HR,1.45; 95% CI, 0.71-2.97; p = .315).

CONCLUSIONS

VPI could predict a poor survival even for node-negative invasive lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size less than 3cm.

Management of stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer

The incidence of stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer is likely to increase with the ageing population and introduction of screening for high-risk individuals. Optimal management requires multidisciplinary collaboration. Local treatments include surgery and radiotherapy and these are currently combined with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in specific cases to improve long-term outcome. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy may also become important therapeutic modalities in this patient group. For resectable disease in patients with low cardiopulmonary risk, complete surgical resection with lobectomy remains the gold standard. Minimally invasive techniques, conservative and sublobar resections are suitable for a subset of patients. Data are emerging that radiotherapy, especially stereotactic body radiation therapy, is a valid alternative in compromised patients who are high-risk candidates for surgery. Whether this is also true for good surgical candidates remains to be evaluated in randomised trials. In specific subgroups adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to prolong survival; however, patient selection remains important. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may yield similar results as adjuvant chemotherapy. The role of targeted therapies and immunotherapy in early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer has not yet been determined and results of randomised trials are awaited.

Concomitant Interstitial Lung Disease Is a Risk Factor for Pleural Invasion in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung carcinoma is often associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the prognosis of lung cancer accompanied by ILD is unfavorable. In this study, cases of patients with primary lung cancer with or without ILD were reviewed to analyze surgical outcome, with special interest in the conformity of clinical and pathologic stages, pathologic findings of pleural invasion, malignant pleurisy first detected at the time of thoracotomy, and survival.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed for 1,264 primary lung cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2004 to 2015. Concomitant ILD was diagnosed by pathological examination or preoperative chest computed tomography findings.

RESULTS

ILD was found in 104 patients (8.2%) with primary lung cancer. Conformity of clinical and pathological stages in the ILD-positive patients was poor, with a lower kappa value than that for the 1,160 ILD-negative patients (0.34 versus 0.51). The ILD group had significantly higher incidences of pleural invasion and unexpected malignant pleurisy than did the non-ILD group (for pleural invasion, 49.0% versus 24.5%, p < 0.0001; for malignant pleurisy, 7.69% versus 1.47%, p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates of the ILD group showed significantly lower than those of the non-ILD group (45.2% versus 70.1%; p = 0.0014) after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS

In lung cancer, the concomitant existence of ILD is a risk factor for pleural invasion. Concomitant ILD might cause underestimation of clinical staging, increase the chance of unexpected malignant pleurisy during surgery, and shorten survival time.

Comparison of the 7(th) and proposed 8(th) editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for non-small cell lung cancer undergoing radical surgery

The present study aims to compare the 7^th and the proposed 8^th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for NSCLC in a cohort of patients from a single institution. A total of 408 patients with NSCLC who underwent radical surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Survivals were analyzed using the Kaplan –Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and C-index were applied to compare the two prognostic systems with different numbers of stages. The 7^th AJCC T categories, the proposed 8^th AJCC T categories, N categories, visceral pleural invasion, and vessel invasion were found to have statistically significant associations with disease-free survival (DFS) on univariate analysis. In the 7^th edition staging system as well as in the proposed 8^th edition, T categories, N categories, and pleural invasion were independent factors for DFS on multivariate analysis. The AIC value was smaller for the 8^th edition compared to the 7^th edition staging system. The C-index value was larger for the 8^th edition compared to the 7^th edition staging system. Based on the data from our single center, the proposed 8^th AJCC T classification seems to be superior to the 7^th AJCC T classification in terms of DFS for patients with NSCLC underwent radical surgery.