Development of highly reactive mono-(meth)acrylates as reactive diluents for dimethacrylate-based dental resin systems

Evaluation of highly reactive mono-methacrylates as reactive diluents for BisGMA-based dental composites

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the performance of highly reactive novel monomethacrylates characterized by various secondary moieties as reactive diluent alternatives to TEGDMA in BisGMA filled dental resins. We hypothesize that these monomers improve material properties and kinetics over TEGDMA because of their unique polymerization behavior.

METHODS

The cure rates and final double bond conversion of the resins were measured using real-time FTIR spectroscopy. The glass transition temperature and storage modulus of the formed polymers were measured using dynamic mechanical analysis. Flexural modulus and flexural strength values were obtained using a three-point bending flexural test.

RESULTS

Polymerization kinetics and polymer mechanical properties were evaluated for the novel resin composites. It was observed that upon the use of novel monomethacrylates as reactive diluents, polymerization kinetics increased by up to 3-fold accompanied by increases in the extent of cure from 5% to 13% as compared to the BisGMA/TEGDMA control. Polymer composites formed from resins of BisGMA/novel monomethacrylates exhibited comparable T(g) values to the control, along with 27-37% reductions in the glass transition half widths indicating the formation of more homogeneous polymeric networks. The BisGMA/monomethacrylate formulations exhibited equivalent flexural modulus and flexural strength values relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA.

SIGNIFICANCE

Formulations containing novel monovinyl methacrylates exhibit dramatically increased curing rates while also exhibiting superior or at least comparable composite polymer mechanical properties. Thus, these types of materials are attractive for use as reactive diluent alternatives to TEGDMA in dental formulations.

Rheological properties of flowable resin composites and pit and fissure sealants

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this research was to determine the viscoelastic properties of commercially available flowable resin composites and resin-based pit and fissure sealants. The weight percentage of filler particles and the morphology of the filler particles were also investigated.

METHODS

Eight flowable resin composites (Admira Flow, Filtek Flow, FlowLine, Grandio Flow, Point-4 Flowable, Revolution Formula 2, Tetric Flow and X-Flow) and four pit and fissure sealants (Clinpro, Delton FS+, Estiseal F and Guardian Seal) were tested. Rheological measurements were performed using a dynamic oscillation rheometer. The filler weight content was determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and the morphology of the particles was investigated by scanning-electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Flowable resin composites are non-Newtonian, shear-thinning materials. As the shear rate increased, the complex viscosity decreased drastically. They all showed elasticity even at the lowest frequencies. They also all showed thixotropy. Pit and fissure sealants are non-Newtonian, very low-viscosity fluids. No correlation was found between the rheological properties and the filler weight content or the particles' shape.

SIGNIFICANCE

Huge differences are observed in the viscosity and flow characteristics of flowable resin composites that can have a potential influence on their clinical behavior during handling and thus on their clinical indications. Pit and fissure sealants show very different rheological properties from one another.

Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives

Dental adhesives are designed to bond composite resins to enamel and dentin. Their chemical formulation determines to a large extent their adhesive performance in clinic. Irrespective of the number of bottles, an adhesive system typically contains resin monomers, curing initiators, inhibitors or stabilizers, solvents and sometimes inorganic filler. Each one of these components has a specific function. The aim of this article is to systematically review the ingredients commonly used in current dental adhesives as well as the properties of these ingredients. This paper includes an extensive table with the chemical formulation of contemporary dental adhesives.

Copolymerization and Dark Polymerization Studies for Photopolymerization of Novel Acrylic Monomers

The copolymerization behavior and the dark polymerization kinetics of highly reactive novel acrylic monomers were compared to traditional acrylate monomers. Copolymerization of thiol functionalities with novel acrylic monomers was characterized, and it was observed that the inclusion of secondary functionalities such as carbamates, carbonates, and cyclic carbonates, in acrylic monomers significantly alters the relative reactivity of the novel acrylates with thiols. While traditional aliphatic acrylates exhibited propagation to chain transfer ratios ranging between 0.8 (± 0.1)-1.5(± 0.2), the novel acrylates characterized by secondary functionalities exhibited much higher propagation to chain transfer ratios ranging from 2.8(± 0.2)-4(± 0.2). In the dark polymerization studies, the kinetics of the novel acrylates were evaluated following cessation of the UV light. The novel acrylates exhibited extensive polymerization in the dark compared to most traditional acrylates and diacrylates. For instance, cyclic carbonate acrylate was observed to attain 35 % additional conversion in the dark when the UV light was extinguished at 35 % conversion, whereas traditional acrylates such as hexyl acrylate attained only 3 % additional conversion when the UV light was extinguished at 35 %, and a diacrylate such as HDDA attained 15 % additional conversion when the UV light was extinguished at 40 % conversion. Also, through choice of appropriate monomers, the dark polymerization studies were performed such that the polymerization rate was approximately the same at the point the light was extinguished for all these monomers. The copolymerization and dark polymerization studies support the hypothesis that the nature of the propagating species in the novel acrylates is altered as compared to traditional acrylic monomers and polymerizations.

Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems

OBJECTIVES

This study: 1) analyzed the surface roughness of five novel resin composites that contain nanoparticles after polishing with three different one-step systems and 2) evaluated the effectiveness of these polishers and their possible surface damage using scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis.

METHODS

The resin composites evaluated in this study include CeramX, Filtek Supreme XT, Grandio, Premise and Tetric EvoCeram. A total of 100 discs (20/resin composites, 10 x 2 mm) were fabricated. Five specimens/resin composites cured under Mylar strips served as the control. The samples were polished for 30 seconds with PoGo, OptraPol and One Gloss discs at 15,000 rpm using a slow speed handpiece. The surfaces were tested for roughness (Ra) with a surface roughness tester and examined with SEM. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (p = 0.05).

RESULTS

For all the composites tested, differences between the polishing systems were found to be significant (p < 0.05). For Filtek Supreme XT, Mylar and PoGo created equally smooth surfaces, while significantly rougher surfaces were obtained after OptraPol and One Gloss applications. For Grandio, Mylar and PoGo created equally smooth surfaces, while OptraPol and One Gloss produced equally rougher surfaces. Tetric EvoCeram exhibited the roughest surface with OptraPol, while no significant differences were found between Premise and CeramX. According to SEM images, OptraPol and One Gloss scratched and plucked the particles away from the surface, while PoGo created a uniform finish, although the roughness values were not the same for each composite.

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness of the polishers seems to be material dependent.

Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare the inorganic fraction and the mechanical properties of three nanofilled composites with four universal hybrid and two microfilled composites. The degrees of conversion of the materials photopolymerized using halogen and LED units were also investigated.

METHODS

Three nanofilled (Supreme, Grandio and Grandio Flow), four universal hybrid (Point-4, Tetric Ceram, Venus, Z 100) and two microfilled (A 110, Durafill VS) composites were used in this study. Their filler weight content was measured by thermogravimetric analysis. The morphology of the filler particles was determined using scanning-electron microscopy (SEM). Mechanical properties were measured: dynamic and static elastic moduli, flexural strength and Vickers microhardness. The degree of conversion in relation with the depth of polymerization of every material tested was evaluated using Raman spectrophotometry.

RESULTS

Nanofilled resin composites show higher elastic moduli than those of universal and microfilled composites, except for the Z-100. The microfilled composites exhibit by far the lowest mechanical properties. The flexural strength does not appear as a discriminating factor in this study. The degrees of polymerization obtained with the halogen lamp are higher than those obtained with the LED lamp.

SIGNIFICANCE

Nanofilled resin composites show mechanical properties at least as good as those of universal hybrids and could thus be used for the same clinical indications as well as for anterior restorations due to their high aesthetic properties.