Corticotrophin-releasing factor and stress-induced inhibition of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone pulse generator in the female

Stress and reproduction: controversies and challenges

Inhibition of reproductive function by the activation of the stress-response has been observed since times of antiquity, however delineating a molecular mechanism by which this occurs in vertebrates continues to present a major challenge. Because recent genome sequencing programs have identified the presence of numerous paralogous peptides and receptors, our understanding of the complexity of the interaction between the reproductive and stress axes has expanded. At the neuroendocrine level, numerous studies have focused on the interaction between the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) systems in vertebrates. Moreover, most of these studies have been performed using rodent models and may not be completely relevant for non-mammalian vertebrates. A further problem lies in the variation of the functional expression of paralogous genes in the different taxa. In particular, the urocortin 2 and GnRH-II systems have been lost in some lineages, where its function has been taken over by urocortin 3 and GnRH-I, respectively. Establishing an integrated model that incorporates all paralogous systems for both the stress and reproductive system remains to be achieved.

The role of the medial and central amygdala in stress-induced suppression of pulsatile LH secretion in female rats

Stress exerts profound inhibitory effects on reproductive function by suppressing the pulsatile release of GnRH and therefore LH. Although the mechanisms by which stressors disrupt the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator remain to be fully elucidated, numerous studies have implicated the amygdala, especially its medial (MeA) and central nuclei (CeA), as key modulators of the neuroendocrine response to stress. In the present study, we investigated the roles of the MeA and CeA in stress-induced suppression of LH pulses. Ovariectomized rats received bilateral ibotenic acid or sham lesions targeting the MeA or CeA; blood samples (25 μl) were taken via chronically implanted cardiac catheters every 5 min for 6 h for the measurement of LH pulses. After 2 h of baseline sampling, the rats were exposed to either: restraint (1 h), insulin-induced hypoglycemia (IIH) (0.3 U/kg, iv), or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (25 μg/kg, iv) stress. The restraint but not IIH or LPS stress-induced suppression of LH pulses was markedly attenuated by the MeA lesions. In contrast, CeA lesioning attenuated LPS, but not restraint or IIH stress-induced suppression of LH pulses. Moreover, after restraint stress, the number of Fos-positive neurons and the percentage of glutamic acid decarboxylase(67) neurons expressing Fos was significantly greater in the GnRH-rich medial preoptic area (mPOA) of rats with intact, rather than lesioned, MeA. These data indicate that the MeA and CeA play key roles in psychogenic and immunological stress-induced suppression of the GnRH pulse generator, respectively, and the MeA-mediated effect may involve γ-aminobutyric acid ergic signaling within the mPOA.