BubR1- and Polo-coated DNA tethers facilitate poleward segregation of acentric chromatids

Sumoylated BubR1 plays an important role in chromosome segregation and mitotic timing

BubR1 is an important component of the spindle assembly checkpoint, and deregulated BubR1 functions frequently result in chromosomal instability and malignant transformation. We recently demonstrated that BubR1 was modified by sumoylation, and that lysine 250 (K250) functions as the crucial site for this modification. BubR1 sumoylation was neither required for its activation nor for binding to kinetochores. However, ectopically expressed sumoylation-deficient BubR1 mutants were retained on the kintochores even after apparent chromosome congression. The kinetochore retention of the sumoylation-deficient mutant of BubR1 caused an anaphase delay coupled with premature sister chromatid separation. Moreover, BubR1 interacted with unphosphorylated Sgo1, and its sumoylation facilitated the interaction. BubR1 sumoylation was inversely associated with its acetylation during mitotic progression. Trichostatin A, a protein deacetylase inhibitor, significantly compromised BubR1 sumoylation. Combined, these results reveal that BubR1 sumoylation plays an important role in its timely removal from the kinetochores and the checkpoint inactivation, thus allowing normal anaphase entry and chromosome segregation.

Chk1 and Wee1 kinases coordinate DNA replication, chromosome condensation, and anaphase entry

New chromosome condensation checkpoints are identified. S-phase and topoisomerase inhibitors delay chromosome condensation. These delays require chk1 and wee1. Inhibitors causing defects in chromosome condensation/congression on the metaphase plate delay anaphase entry. wee1 and not the spindle assembly checkpoint mediates the delay.

Defects in DNA replication and chromosome condensation are common phenotypes in cancer cells. A link between replication and condensation has been established, but little is known about the role of checkpoints in monitoring chromosome condensation. We investigate this function by live analysis, using the rapid division cycles in the early Drosophila embryo. We find that S-phase and topoisomerase inhibitors delay both the initiation and the rate of chromosome condensation. These cell cycle delays are mediated by the cell cycle kinases chk1 and wee1. Inhibitors that cause severe defects in chromosome condensation and congression on the metaphase plate result in delayed anaphase entry. These delays are mediated by wee1 and are not the result of spindle assembly checkpoint activation. In addition, we provide the first detailed live analysis of the direct effect of widely used anticancer agents (aclarubicin, ICRF-193, VM26, doxorubicin, camptothecin, aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, cisplatin, mechlorethamine and x-rays) on key nuclear and cytoplasmic cell cycle events.

Safeguarding genetic information in Drosophila

Eukaryotic cells employ a plethora of conserved proteins and mechanisms to ensure genome integrity. In metazoa, these mechanisms must operate in the context of organism development. This mini-review highlights two emerging features of DNA damage responses in Drosophila: a crosstalk between DNA damage responses and components of the spindle assembly checkpoint, and increasing evidence for the effect of DNA damage on the developmental program at multiple points during the Drosophila life cycle.

Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) in heterochromatic repetitive DNAs pose significant threats to genome integrity, but information about how such lesions are processed and repaired is sparse. We observe dramatic expansion and dynamic protrusions of the heterochromatin domain in response to ionizing radiation (IR) in Drosophila cells. We also find that heterochromatic DSBs are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) but with striking differences from euchromatin. Proteins involved in early HR events (resection) are rapidly recruited to DSBs within heterochromatin. In contrast, Rad51, which mediates strand invasion, only associates with DSBs that relocalize outside of the domain. Heterochromatin expansion and relocalization of foci require checkpoint and resection proteins. Finally, the Smc5/6 complex is enriched in heterochromatin and is required to exclude Rad51 from the domain and prevent abnormal recombination. We propose that the spatial and temporal control of DSB repair in heterochromatin safeguards genome stability by preventing aberrant exchanges between repeats.

Drosophila Mis12 complex acts as a single functional unit essential for anaphase chromosome movement and a robust spindle assembly checkpoint

The kinetochore is a dynamic multiprotein complex assembled at the centromere in mitosis. Exactly how the structure of the kinetochore changes during mitosis and how its individual components contribute to chromosome segregation is largely unknown. Here we have focused on the contribution of the Mis12 complex to kinetochore assembly and function throughout mitosis in Drosophila. We show that despite the sequential kinetochore recruitment of Mis12 complex subunits Mis12 and Nsl1, the complex acts as a single functional unit. mis12 and nsl1 mutants show strikingly similar developmental and mitotic defects in which chromosomes are able to congress at metaphase, but their anaphase movement is strongly affected. While kinetochore association of Ndc80 absolutely depends on both Mis12 and Nsl1, BubR1 localization shows only partial dependency. In the presence of residual centromeric BubR1 the checkpoint still responds to microtubule depolymerization but is significantly weaker. These observations point to a complexity of the checkpoint response that may reflect subpopulations of BubR1 associated with residual kinetochore components, the core centromere, or elsewhere in the cell. Importantly our results indicate that core structural elements of the inner plate of the kinetochore have a greater contribution to faithful chromosome segregation in anaphase than in earlier stages of mitosis.

Comparison of mitotic cell death by chromosome fragmentation to premature chromosome condensation

Mitotic cell death is an important form of cell death, particularly in cancer. Chromosome fragmentation is a major form of mitotic cell death which is identifiable during common cytogenetic analysis by its unique phenotype of progressively degraded chromosomes. This morphology however, can appear similar to the morphology of premature chromosome condensation (PCC) and thus, PCC has been at times confused with chromosome fragmentation. In this analysis the phenomena of chromosome fragmentation and PCC are reviewed and their similarities and differences are discussed in order to facilitate differentiation of the similar morphologies. Furthermore, chromosome pulverization, which has been used almost synonymously with PCC, is re-examined. Interestingly, many past reports of chromosome pulverization are identified here as chromosome fragmentation and not PCC. These reports describe broad ranging mechanisms of pulverization induction and agree with recent evidence showing chromosome fragmentation is a cellular response to stress. Finally, biological aspects of chromosome fragmentation are discussed, including its application as one form of non-clonal chromosome aberration (NCCA), the driving force of cancer evolution.

BUB1 and BUBR1: multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle

The multidomain protein kinases BUB1 and BUBR1 (Mad3 in yeast, worms and plants) are central components of the mitotic checkpoint for spindle assembly (SAC). This evolutionarily conserved and essential self-monitoring system of the eukaryotic cell cycle ensures the high fidelity of chromosome segregation by delaying the onset of anaphase until all chromosomes are properly bi-oriented on the mitotic spindle. Despite their amino acid sequence conservation and similar domain organization, BUB1 and BUBR1 perform different functions in the SAC. Recent structural information provides crucial molecular insights into the regulation and recognition of BUB1 and BUBR1, and a solid foundation to dissect the roles of these proteins in the control of chromosome segregation in normal and oncogenic cells.

Defining the molecular basis of BubR1 kinetochore interactions and APC/C-CDC20 inhibition

BubR1 is essential for the mitotic checkpoint that prevents aneuploidy in cellular progeny by triggering anaphase delay in response to kinetochores incorrectly/not attached to the mitotic spindle. Here, we define the molecular architecture of the functionally significant N-terminal region of human BubR1 and present the 1.8 A crystal structure of its tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain. The structure reveals divergence from the classical TPR fold and is highly similar to the TPR domain of budding yeast Bub1. Shared distinctive features include a disordered loop insertion, a 3(10)-helix, a tight turn involving glycine positive Phi angles, and noncanonical packing of and between the TPR motifs. We also define the molecular determinants of the interaction between BubR1 and kinetochore protein Blinkin. We identify a shallow groove on the concave surface of the BubR1 TPR domain that forms multiple discrete and potentially cooperative interactions with Blinkin. Finally, we present evidence for a direct interaction between BubR1 and Bub1 mediated by regions C-terminal to their TPR domains. This interaction provides a mechanism for Bub1-dependent kinetochore recruitment of BubR1. We thus present novel molecular insights into the structure of BubR1 and its interactions at the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Our studies pave the way for future structure-directed engineering aimed at dissecting the roles of kinetochore-bound and other pools of BubR1 in vivo.