Intracellular complement C5a/C5aR1 stabilizes β-catenin to promote colorectal tumorigenesis

Multiple potassium channel tetramerization domain (KCTD) family members interact with Gβγ, with effects on cAMP signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) initiate an array of intracellular signaling programs by activating heterotrimeric G proteins (Gα and Gβγ subunits). Therefore, G protein modifiers are well positioned to shape GPCR pharmacology. A few members of the potassium channel tetramerization domain (KCTD) protein family have been found to adjust G protein signaling through interaction with Gβγ. However, comprehensive details on the KCTD interaction with Gβγ remain unresolved. Here, we report that nearly all the 25 KCTD proteins interact with Gβγ. In this study, we screened Gβγ interaction capacity across the entire KCTD family using two parallel approaches. In a live cell bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay, we find that roughly half of KCTD proteins interact with Gβγ in an agonist-induced fashion, whereas all KCTD proteins except two were found to interact through coimmunoprecipitation. We observed that the interaction was dependent on an amino acid hot spot in the C terminus of KCTD2, KCTD5, and KCTD17. While KCTD2 and KCTD5 require both the Bric-à-brac, Tramtrack, Broad complex domain and C-terminal regions for Gβγ interaction, we uncovered that the KCTD17 C terminus is sufficient for Gβγ interaction. Finally, we demonstrated the functional consequence of the KCTD-Gβγ interaction by examining sensitization of the adenylyl cyclase-cAMP pathway in live cells. We found that Gβγ-mediated sensitization of adenylyl cyclase 5 was blunted by KCTD. We conclude that the KCTD family broadly engages Gβγ to shape GPCR signal transmission.

Thinking inside the box: intracellular roles for complement system proteins come into focus

Over the last decade, perspectives on the complement system in the context of cancer have shifted, with complement proteins now implicated in many of the hallmarks of cancer. Systemically, the generation of complement anaphylatoxin C5a, the most potent inflammatory mediator of the cascade, occurs following convertase-mediated cleavage of complement component C5. In a recent manuscript, Ding et al., propose that in colorectal cancer cells, C5 cleavage can occur intracellularly and in a convertase-independent manner, identifying cathepsin D as an enzyme capable of cleaving C5 into C5a [1]. Intracellular C5a is functional and promotes β-catenin stabilisation via the assembly of a KCTD5/cullin3/Roc-1 complex. Importantly, the blockade of C5aR1 prevents tumorigenesis. This study adds to a growing body of evidence indicating that complement proteins, previously thought to primarily have extracellular or membrane-bound functions, also have important intracellular roles.

The genetic and epigenetic regulation of CD55 and its pathway analysis in colon cancer

Background

CD55 plays an important role in the development of colon cancer. This study aims to evaluate the expression of CD55 in colon cancer and discover how it is regulated by transcriptional factors and miRNA.

Methods

The expression of CD55 was explored by TIMER2.0, UALCAN, and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) databases. TRANSFAC and Contra v3 were used to predict the potential binding sites of transcription factors in the CD55 promoter. TargetScan and starBase v2.0 were used to predict the potential binding ability of miRNAs to the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of CD55. SurvivalMeth was used to explore the differentially methylated sites in the CD55 promoter. Western blotting was used to detect the expression of TFCP2 and CD55. Dual-luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay were performed to determine the targeting relationship of TFCP2, NF-κB, or miR-27a-3p with CD55. CD55-related genes were explored by constructing a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and performing pathway analysis by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).

Results

CD55 was highly expressed in colon cancer tissues. The mRNA and protein expression levels of TFCP2 were reduced by si-TFCP2. NF-κB mRNA was obviously reduced by NF-κB inhibitor and increased by NF-κB activator. CD55 protein was also inhibited by miR-27a-3p. Dual-luciferase reporter assays showed that after knocking down TFCP2 or inhibiting NF-κB, the promoter activity of CD55 was decreased by 21% and 70%, respectively; after activating NF-κB, the promoter activity of CD55 increased by 2.3 times. As TFCP2 or NF-κB binding site was mutated, the transcriptional activity of CD55 was significantly decreased. ChIP assay showed that TFCP2 and NF-κB combined to the promoter of CD55. The luciferase activity of CD55 3'UTR decreased after being co-transfected with miR-27a-3p mimics and increased by miR-27a-3p antagomir. As the miR-27a-3p binding site was mutated, we did not find any significant effect of miR-27a-3p on reporter activity. PPI network assay revealed a set of CD55-related genes, which included CFP, CFB, C4A, and C4B. GO and KEGG analyses revealed that the target genes occur more frequently in immune-related pathways.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that CD55 is regulated by TFCP2, NF-κB, miR-27a-3p, and several immune-related genes, which in turn affects colon cancer.

Intracellular complement: Evidence, definitions, controversies, and solutions

The term "intracellular complement" has been introduced recently as an umbrella term to distinguish functions of complement proteins that take place intracellularly, rather than in the extracellular environment. However, this rather undefined term leaves some confusion as to the classification of what intracellular complement really is, and as to which intracellular compartment(s) it should refer to. In this review, we will describe the evidence for both canonical and non-canonical functions of intracellular complement proteins, as well as the current controversies and unanswered questions as to the nature of the intracellular complement. We also suggest new terms to facilitate the accurate description and discussion of specific forms of intracellular complement and call for future experiments that will be required to provide more definitive evidence and a better understanding of the mechanisms of intracellular complement activity.

Complement and Fungal Dysbiosis as Prognostic Markers and Potential Targets in PDAC Treatment

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still hampered by a dismal prognosis. A better understanding of the tumor microenvironment within the pancreas and of the factors affecting its composition is of utmost importance for developing new diagnostic and treatment tools. In this context, the complement system plays a prominent role. Not only has it been shown to shape a T cell-mediated immune response, but it also directly affects proliferation and apoptosis of the tumor cells, influencing angiogenesis, metastatic spread and therapeutic resistance. This makes complement proteins appealing not only as early biomarkers of PDAC development, but also as therapeutic targets. Fungal dysbiosis is currently the new kid on the block in tumorigenesis with cancer-associated mycobiomes extracted from several cancer types. For PDAC, colonization with the yeast Malassezia seems to promote cancer progression, already in precursor lesions. One responsible mechanism appears to be complement activation via the lectin pathway. In the present article, we review the role of the complement system in tumorigenesis, presenting observations that propose it as the missing link between fungal dysbiosis and PDAC development. We also present the results of a small pilot study supporting the crucial interplay between the complement system and Malassezia colonization in PDAC pathogenesis.

The complement system as a regulator of tumor-promoting activities mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Tumor progression relies on the interaction between tumor cells and their surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME), which also influences therapeutic responses. The complement system, an essential part of innate immunity, has been traditionally considered an effector arm against tumors. However, established tumors co-opt complement-mediated immune responses in the TME to support chronic inflammation, activate cancer-related signaling pathways and hamper antitumor immune responses. In this context, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), a heterogeneous population of myeloid progenitors with immunosuppressive functions, are recognized as major mediators of tumor-associated complement activities. This review focuses on the impact of complement activation within the TME, with a special emphasis on MDSC functions and the involvement of the C5a/C5aR1 axis. We also discuss the translation of these findings into therapeutic advances based on complement inhibition.

Complement activation in cancer: Effects on tumor-associated myeloid cells and immunosuppression

Cancer-related inflammation plays a central role in the establishment of tumor-promoting mechanisms. Tumor-associated myeloid cells, which engage in complex interactions with cancer cells, as well as stromal and tumor immune infiltrating cells, promote cancer cell proliferation and survival, angiogenesis, and the generation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment. The complement system is one of the inflammatory mechanisms activated in the tumor microenvironment. Beside exerting anti-tumor mechanisms such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity and phagocytosis induced by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, the complement system may promote immunosuppression and tumor growth and invasiveness, in particular, through the anaphylatoxins which target both leukocytes and cancer cells. In this review, we will discuss complement-mediated mechanisms acting on leukocytes, in particular on cells of the myelomonocytic cell lineage (macrophages, neutrophils, myeloid derived suppressor cells), which promote myeloid cell recruitment and functional skewing, leading to immunosuppression and resistance to tumor-specific immunity. Pre-clinical studies, which have elucidated the role of complement in activating pro-tumor mechanisms in myeloid cells, showing the relevance of these mechanisms in human, and therapeutic approaches based on complement targeting support the hypothesis that complement directly and indirectly interferes with many of the effector pathways associated with the cancer-immunity cycle, suggesting the relevance of complement targeting to improve responses to immunotherapeutic approaches.