Integration of supercritical fluid chromatography into drug discovery as a routine support tool

Characterisation of stationary phases in subcritical fluid chromatography with the solvation parameter model IV

The purpose of the present work was to systematically study the chromatographic behaviour of different aromatic stationary phases in a subcritical fluid mobile phase. We attempted to assess the chemical origin of the differences in retention characteristics between the different columns. Various types of aromatic stationary phases, all commercially available, were investigated. The effect of the nature of the aromatic bonding on interactions between solute and stationary phases and between solute and carbon dioxide-methanol mobile phase was studied by the use of a linear solvation energy relationship (LSER): the solvation parameter model. This study was performed to provide a greater knowledge of the properties of these phases in subcritical fluid chromatography, and to allow a more rapid and efficient choice of aromatic stationary phase in regard of the chemical nature of the solutes to be separated. Charge transfer interactions naturally contribute to the retention on all these stationary phases but are completed by various other types of interactions, depending on the nature of the aromatic group. The solvation vectors were used to compare the different phase properties. In particular, the similarities in the chromatographic behaviour of porous graphitic carbon (PGC), polystyrene-divinylbenzene (PS-DVB) and aromatic-bonded silica stationary phases are evidenced.

Characterisation of stationary phases in subcritical fluid chromatography with the solvation parameter model

In this third paper, varied types of polar stationary phases, namely silica gel (SI), cyano (CN)- and amino-propyl (NH2)-bonded silica, propanediol-bonded silica (DIOL), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), were investigated in subcritical fluid mobile phase. This study was performed to provide a greater knowledge of the properties of these phases in SFC, and to allow a more rapid and efficient choice of polar stationary phase in regard of the chemical nature of the solutes to be separated. The effect of the nature of the stationary phase on interactions between solute and stationary phases and between solute and carbon dioxide-modifier mobile phases was studied by the use of a linear solvation energy relationship (LSER), the solvation parameter model. The retention behaviour observed with sub/supercritical fluid with carbon dioxide-methanol is close to the one reported in normal-phase liquid chromatography with hexane. The hydrogen bond acidity and basicity, and the polarity/polarizability favour the solute retention when the molar volume of the solute reduces it. As with non-polar phases, the absence of water in the subcritical fluid allows the solute/stationary phase interactions to play a greater part in the retention behaviour. As expected, the DIOL phase and the bare silica display a similar behaviour towards acidic and basic solutes, when interactions with basic compounds are lower with the NH2 phase. On the CN phase, all interactions (hydrogen bonding, dipole-dipole and charge transfer) have a nearly equivalent weight on the retention. The polymeric phases, PEG and PVA, provide the most accurate models, possibly due to their better surface homogeneity.

Characterization of stationary phases in subcritical fluid chromatography by the solvation parameter model

Varied types of alkylsiloxane-bonded and fluoroalkylsiloxane-bonded stationary phases, all commercially available, were investigated with subcritical fluid mobile phase. The effect of the alkyl chain length (from C4 to C18) and of the nature of the bonding (fluorodecylsiloxane, phenyl-C18 and polar-embedded-C18) on the chromatographic behaviour was investigated by the use of a linear solvation energy relationship (LSER), the solvation parameter model. A large set of test compounds provides precise and reliable information on the intermolecular interactions responsible for retention on these stationary phases used with a subcritical mobile phase. First of all, the results underline the close properties between subcritical fluid and organic liquid. The use of non aqueous mobile phases reduces the cavity energy and the mobile phase acidity generally encountered with aqueous liquid phases, allowing other interactions to take a part in retention. As expected, an increase in the alkyl chain length favours the dispersive interactions between the solutes and the stationary phases. Changes in basicity and acidity of the stationary phases are also related to the chain length, but, in this case, mobile phase adsorption onto the stationary phase is supposed to explain these behaviours. The addition of a phenyl group at the bottom of the C18 chain, near the silica, does not induce great modifications in the retentive properties. The fluorodecylsiloxane and the polar-embedded alkylsiloxane phases display very different properties, and can be complementary to the classical alkylsiloxane-bonded phases. In particular, the fluorinated phase does not favour the dispersive interactions, in comparison to hydrogenated stationary phases, when the basicity of the polar-embedded phase is obviously greater than the one of classical alkylsiloxane-bonded phases, due to the amide function. Finally, logk-logk curves plotted between the different phases illustrate the effect of the interaction properties on the retention of different classes of compounds.