Mammaglobin: a candidate diagnostic marker for breast cancer

Detection of Mammaglobin A-mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with operable breast cancer with nested RT-PCR

OBJECTIVES

The development and validation of a nested RT-PCR methodology for the detection of Mammaglobin A-mRNA-positive circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with operable breast cancer and evaluation of its prognostic significance.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Different combinations of specific primers were in silico designed and selected, so that false positive results due to genomic DNA contamination were avoided. The specificity of the primers used was evaluated in 30 healthy individuals, 20 patients with colorectal cancer and 20 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The method was applied in 101 patients with operable breast cancer before the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and 39 patients with metastatic breast cancer.

RESULTS

Mammaglobin A-mRNA-positive cells were detected in 14/101 (13.9%) of early breast cancer patients but not in the control population studied (0%); 9 of them (64.3%) relapsed during the follow-up period. Mammaglobin A was detected in 7/39 (17.9%) of patients with verified metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed the detection of Mammaglobin A-mRNA-positive cells, as an independent risk factor for reduced DFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Mammaglobin A is a highly specific molecular marker for the detection of circulating tumor cells in operable breast cancer, with important prognostic applications.

Expression analysis of mammaglobin A (SCGB2A2) and lipophilin B (SCGB1D2) in more than 300 human tumors and matching normal tissues reveals their co-expression in gynecologic malignancies

Background

Mammaglobin A (SCGB2A2) and lipophilin B (SCGB1D2), two members of the secretoglobin superfamily, are known to be co-expressed in breast cancer, where their proteins form a covalent complex. Based on the relatively high tissue-specific expression pattern, it has been proposed that the mammaglobin A protein and/or its complex with lipophilin B could be used in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. In view of these clinical implications, the aim of the present study was to analyze the expression of both genes in a large panel of human solid tumors (n = 309), corresponding normal tissues (n = 309) and cell lines (n = 11), in order to evaluate their tissue specific expression and co-expression pattern.

Methods

For gene and protein expression analyses, northern blot, dot blot hybridization of matched tumor/normal arrays (cancer profiling arrays), quantitative RT-PCR, non-radioisotopic RNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were used.

Results

Cancer profiling array data demonstrated that mammaglobin A and lipophilin B expression is not restricted to normal and malignant breast tissue. Both genes were abundantly expressed in tumors of the female genital tract, i.e. endometrial, ovarian and cervical cancer. In these four tissues the expression pattern of mammaglobin A and lipophilin B was highly concordant, with both genes being down-, up- or not regulated in the same tissue samples. In breast tissue, mammaglobin A expression was down-regulated in 49% and up-regulated in 12% of breast tumor specimens compared with matching normal tissues, while lipophilin B was down-regulated in 59% and up-regulated in 3% of cases. In endometrial tissue, expression of mammaglobin A and lipophilin B was clearly up-regulated in tumors (47% and 49% respectively). Both genes exhibited down-regulation in 22% of endometrial tumors. The only exceptions to this concordance of mammaglobin A/lipophilin B expression were normal and malignant tissues of prostate and kidney, where only lipophilin B was abundantly expressed and mammaglobin A was entirely absent. RNA in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry confirmed expression of mammaglobin A on a cellular level in endometrial and cervical cancer and their corresponding normal tissues.

Conclusion

Altogether, these data suggest that expression of mammaglobin A and lipophilin B might be controlled in different tissues by the same regulatory transcriptional mechanisms. Diagnostic assays based on mammaglobin A expression and/or the mammaglobin A/lipophilin B complex appear to be less specific for breast cancer, but with a broader spectrum of potential applications, which includes gynecologic malignancies.

Presence of erbB2 mRNA in the plasma of breast cancer patients is associated with circulating tumor cells and negative estrogen and progesterone receptor status

Several studies have demonstrated that tumor cell-derived RNA is presented in the plasma from breast cancer patients. However, no studies have focused on the detection of plasma erbB2 mRNA in breast cancer. In this study the expression of erbB2 mRNA in the plasma was analyzed in 106 breast cancer patients and 50 healthy subjects by using a nested RT-PCR strategy, and the circulating tumor cells were also detected by using a nested RT-PCR for detection of mammaglobin transcripts in the peripheral blood. Plasma erbB2 mRNA was detectable in 46 (43.3%) breast cancer patients, whereas only 5 normal subjects (10%) were positive in the control group (p = 0.001). The presence of erbB2 mRNA in the plasma was not associated with menopausal status, erbB2 expression in primary tumor tissues, tumor size, histological grade, Ki-67 expression or lymph node involvement, but it exhibited a trend for correlation with increasing tumor stages (p = 0.085), and the presence of erbB2 mRNA in the plasma was significantly associated with negative estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of the primary tumors (p = 0.031 and 0.026, respectively). Furthermore, in a small subset of 36 breast cancer patients we found the presence of plasma erbB2 mRNA was significantly correlated with the occurrence of circulating tumor cells (p = 0.01). Our study suggests that breast cancer patients with the presence of erbB2 mRNA in the plasma may have a high malignancy or an aggressive phenotype, and frequently detecting plasma erbB2 mRNA may provide a novel approach for monitoring breast cancer progression or response to treatment.

Identification and characterization of optimal gene expression markers for detection of breast cancer metastasis

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is highly predictive of overall axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer. Historically, SLN-positive patients have undergone axillary lymph node dissection in a second surgery. Intraoperative SLN analysis could reduce the cost and complications of a second surgery; however, existing histopathological methods lack standardization and exhibit poor sensitivity. Rapid molecular methods may lead to improved intraoperative diagnosis of SLN metastasis. In this study, we used a genome-wide gene expression analysis of breast and other tissues to identify seven putative markers for detecting breast cancer metastasis. We assessed the utility of these markers for identifying clinically actionable metastases in lymph nodes through reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of SLNs from 254 breast cancer patients. Polymerase chain reaction signals were compared to pathology on a per-patient basis. The optimal two-gene combination, mammaglobin and cytokeratin 19, detected clinically actionable metastasis in breast SLNs with 90% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Application of stringent criteria for identifying presumptive hematoxylin- and eosin-positive samples increased sensitivity and specificity to 91 and 97%, respectively. This study represents the first comprehensive demonstration of the utility of gene expression markers for detecting clinically actionable breast metastases. An intraoperative molecular assay using these markers has the potential to significantly reduce second surgeries for patients undergoing SLN dissection.

Effect of different cytokines on mammaglobin and maspin gene expression in normal leukocytes: possible relevance to the assays for the detection of micrometastatic breast cancer

In cancer patients, the ability to detect disseminated tumour cells in peripheral blood or bone marrow could improve prognosis and consent both early detection of metastatic disease and monitoring of the efficacy of systemic therapy. These objectives remain elusive mainly due to the lack of specific genetic markers for solid tumours. The use of surrogate tissue-specific markers can reduce the specificity of the assays and give rise to a clinically unacceptable false-positive rate. Mammaglobin (MAM) and maspin are two putative breast tissue-specific markers frequently used for detection of occult tumour cells in the peripheral blood, bone marrow and lymph nodes of breast cancer patients. In this study, it was evaluated whether MAM and maspin gene expression may be induced in the normal blood and bone marrow cells exposed to a panel of cytokines, including chemotactic factors (C5a, interleukin (IL)-8), LPS, proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β) and growth factors (IL-3, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). The experimental data show that all cytokines included in the panel, except for IL-8, were able to induce maspin expression; on the contrary, MAM gene was never induced. These results suggest that MAM is more specific than maspin and that the possible interference of cytokines should be taken into account in interpreting molecular assays for detection of isolated tumour cells.

The human SCGB2A2 (Mammaglobin-1) promoter/enhancer in a helper-dependent adenovirus vector directs high levels of transgene expression in mammary carcinoma cells but not in normal nonmammary cells

Expression of secretoglobin family 2A member 2 (SCGB2A2, also known as mammaglobin-1) has been detected in a high percentage of primary and metastatic breast tumors, to a lesser extent in normal breast, but not in other normal tissues. Plasmid transfection studies in our lab and others, however, were unable to identify the genetic elements regulating this specificity. Here we demonstrate that a 25-kb DNA fragment derived from the human SCGB2A2 gene upstream of the protein coding sequence was highly active and preferentially expressed in breast cancer cells when introduced via a helper-dependent adenoviral (HDAd) vector. HDAd delivery was selected for its high cloning capacity, its high efficiency of gene transfer, and the absence of cis-acting viral sequences that can potentially interfere with specificity of the inserted promoters. A series of vectors with deletions in the 25-kb fragment was constructed to identify important regulatory regions of the SCGB2A2 promoter. We have determined that elements controlling the specificity of expression reside within the first 345 bp upstream of the coding sequence. In addition, we identified a strong enhancer several kilobases upstream of this minimal promoter. We suggest that the SCGB2A2 promoter/enhancer should be particularly advantageous for gene therapy protocols involving oncolytic viruses or toxic gene transfer via adenovectors to mammary tumors.

NB. Mammaglobin as a novel breast cancer biomarker: multigene reverse transcription-PCR assay and sandwich ELISA

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the potential usefulness of a mammaglobin multigene reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay and a mammaglobin sandwich ELISA as diagnostic tools in breast cancer.

METHODS

We studied peripheral blood samples from 147 untreated Senegalese women with biopsy-confirmed breast cancer and gathered patient information regarding demographic, and clinical staging of disease. The samples were tested for mammaglobin and three breast cancer-associated gene transcripts by a multigene real-time RT-PCR assay and for serum mammaglobin protein by a sandwich ELISA assay.

RESULTS

In 77% of the breast cancer blood samples, a positive signal was obtained in the multigene RT-PCR assay detecting mammaglobin and three complementary transcribed genes. Fifty samples from healthy female donors tested negative. Significant correlations were found between mammaglobin protein in serum, presence of mammaglobin mRNA-expressing cells in blood, stage of disease, and tumor size. Circulating mammaglobin protein was detected in 68% of the breast cancer sera, and was increased in 38% in comparison with a mixed control population. The RT-PCR assay and the ELISA for mammaglobin produced a combined sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 97%.

CONCLUSION

The ELISA and RT-PCR for mammaglobin and mammaglobin-producing cells could be valuable tools for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer.