Polyelectrolyte/surfactant mixtures at the air–solution interface

Foaming and foam stability for mixed polymer-surfactant solutions: effects of surfactant type and polymer charge

Solutions of surfactant-polymer mixtures often exhibit different foaming properties, compared to the solutions of the individual components, due to the strong tendency for formation of polymer-surfactant complexes in the bulk and on the surface of the mixed solutions. A generally shared view in the literature is that electrostatic interactions govern the formation of these complexes, for example between anionic surfactants and cationic polymers. In this study we combine foam tests with model experiments to evaluate and explain the effect of several polymer-surfactant mixtures on the foaminess and foam stability of the respective solutions. Anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants (SDS, C(12)TAB, and C(12)EO(23)) were studied to clarify the role of surfactant charge. Highly hydrophilic cationic and nonionic polymers (polyvinylamine and polyvinylformamide, respectivey) were chosen to eliminate the (more trivial) effect of direct hydrophobic interactions between the surfactant tails and the hydrophobic regions on the polymer chains. Our experiments showed clearly that the presence of opposite charges is not a necessary condition for boosting the foaminess and foam stability in the surfactant-polymer mixtures studied. Clear foam boosting (synergistic) effects were observed in the mixtures of cationic surfactant and cationic polymer, cationic surfactant and nonionic polymer, and anionic surfactant and nonionic polymer. The mixtures of anionic surfactant and cationic polymer showed improved foam stability, however, the foaminess was strongly reduced, as compared to the surfactant solutions without polymer. No significant synergistic or antagonistic effects were observed for the mixture of nonionic surfactant (with low critical micelle concentration) and nonionic polymer. The results from the model experiments allowed us to explain the observed trends by the different adsorption dynamics and complex formation pattern in the systems studied.

Polyampholyte-surfactant film tuning in reverse microemulsions

The pH-dependent influence of two different strongly alternating copolymers [poly(N,N'-diallyl-N,N'-dimethylammonium-alt-N-phenylmaleamic carboxylate) (PalPh) and poly(N,N'-diallyl-N,N'-dimethylammonium-alt-3,5-bis(carboxyphenyl)maleamic carboxylate) (PalPhBisCarb)] based on N,N'-diallyl-N,N'-dimethylammonium chloride and maleamic acid derivatives on the phase behavior of a water-in-oil (w/o) microemulsion system made from toluene-pentanol (1:1) and sodium dodecyl sulfate was investigated. It was shown that the optically clear phase range can be extended after incorporation of these copolymers, leading to an increased water solubilization capacity. Additionally, the required amount of surfactant to establish a clear w/o microemulsion depends on the pH value, which means the hydrophobicity of the copolymers. Conductivity measurements show that droplet-droplet interactions in the w/o microemulsion are decreased at acidic but increased at alkaline pH in the presence of the copolymers. From differential scanning calorimetry measurements one can further conclude that these results are in agreement with a change of the position of the copolymer in the interfacial region of the surfactant film. The more hydrophobic PalPh can be directly incorporated into the surfactant film, whereas the phenyl groups of PalPhBisCarb flip into the water core by increasing the pH value.

Adsorption of polyelectrolyte/surfactant mixtures at the air-water interface: modified poly(ethyleneimine) and sodium dodecyl sulfate

The adsorption of surfactant/polyelectrolyte mixtures of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and different modified poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI) polyelectrolytes at the air-water interface has been studied using neutron reflectivity and surface tension. Modification of the PEI by the addition of short ethylene oxide (EO) or propylene oxide (PO) groups is shown to have an impact upon the surface adsorption behavior. This is due to a modification of the polymer/surfactant interaction, an increase in the intrinsic surface activity of the modified polyelectrolyte, and changes in the relative importance of surface and solution complex formation. For the polyelectrolyte PEI, there is a marked change in the surface adsorption behavior between the addition of a single EO group and that of the (EO)3 group. The addition of a single EO or PO group to the PEI results in an SDS concentration and solution pH adsorption dependence that is broadly similar in behavior to that of the unmodified PEI/SDS mixture. That is, there is strong surface complexation and adsorption down to low SDS concentrations, and there is evidence of a strong interaction at high pH in addition to the strong electrostatic attraction at low pH. The addition of a larger ethylene oxide group, triethylene oxide (EO)3, results in a surface adsorption behavior that more closely resembles that of a neutral polymer/ionic surfactant mixture, similar to that observed for PEI with a larger ethylene oxide group, notably PEI-(EO)7. In that case, the adsorption of the polymer/surfactant complex is much less pronounced. The adsorption arises predominantly from competition between the polymer and surfactant and indicates a decrease in the polymer/surfactant interaction with increasing pH. That is, increasing the size of the ethylene oxide group induces a transition from a strong surface polymer/surfactant interaction to a weak polymer/surfactant interaction.

Not all anionic polyelectrolytes complex with DTAB

The influence of hydroxypropyl guar (HPG), with and without boric acid, on dodecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (DTAB) micellization was characterized by surface tension measurements, isothermal titration calorimetry, and small-angle neutron scattering. Although HPG is a nonionic water-soluble polymer, borate ions form weak bonds with HPG, transforming it into an anionic polyelectrolyte, HPG-borate. Surprisingly, the three independent measurements showed that HPG-borate does not promote DTAB micellization or phase separation normally seen when mixing oppositely charged polyelectrolytes and surfactants. However, the neutron scattering results suggested that HPG-borate binds to and flocculates existing DTAB micelles. The unusual behavior of HPG-borate with DTAB was underscored by showing that carboxymethyl guar (CMG) formed precipitates with DTAB.

Thermodynamics, adsorption kinetics and rheology of mixed protein-surfactant interfacial layers

Depending on the bulk composition, adsorption layers formed from mixed protein/surfactant solutions contain different amounts of protein. Clearly, increasing amounts of surfactant should decrease the amount of adsorbed proteins successively. However, due to the much larger adsorption energy, proteins are rather strongly bound to the interface and via competitive adsorption surfactants cannot easily displace proteins. A thermodynamic theory was developed recently which describes the composition of mixed protein/surfactant adsorption layers. This theory is based on models for the single compounds and allows a prognosis of the resulting mixed layers by using the characteristic parameters of the involved components. This thermodynamic theory serves also as the respective boundary condition for the dynamics of adsorption layers formed from mixed solutions and their dilational rheological behaviour. Based on experimental studies with milk proteins (beta-casein and beta-lactoglobulin) mixed with non-ionic (decyl and dodecyl dimethyl phosphine oxide) and ionic (sodium dodecyl sulphate and dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) surfactants at the water/air and water/hexane interfaces, the potential of the theoretical tools is demonstrated. The displacement of pre-adsorbed proteins by subsequently added surfactant can be successfully studied by a special experimental technique based on a drop volume exchange. In this way the drop profile analysis can provide tensiometry and dilational rheology data (via drop oscillation experiments) for two adsorption routes--sequential adsorption of the single compounds in addition to the traditional simultaneous adsorption from a mixed solution. Complementary measurements of the surface shear rheology and the adsorption layer thickness via ellipsometry are added in order to support the proposed mechanisms drawn from tensiometry and dilational rheology, i.e. to show that the formation of mixed adsorption layer is based on a modification of the protein molecules via electrostatic (ionic) and/or hydrophobic interactions by the surfactant molecules and a competitive adsorption of the resulting complexes with the free, unbound surfactant. Under certain conditions, the properties of the sequentially formed layers differ from those formed simultaneously, which can be explained by the different locations of complex formation.

Minimising oil droplet size using ultrasonic emulsification

The efficient production of nanoemulsions, with oil droplet sizes of less than 100nm would facilitate the inclusion of oil soluble bio-active agents into a range of water based foods. Small droplet sizes lead to transparent emulsions so that product appearance is not altered by the addition of an oil phase. In this paper, we demonstrate that it is possible to create remarkably small transparent O/W nanoemulsions with average diameters as low as 40nm from sunflower oil. This is achieved using ultrasound or high shear homogenization and a surfactant/co-surfactant/oil system that is well optimised. The minimum droplet size of 40nm, was only obtained when both droplet deformability (surfactant design) and the applied shear (equipment geometry) were optimal. The time required to achieve the minimum droplet size was also clearly affected by the equipment configuration. Results at atmospheric pressure fitted an expected exponential relationship with the total energy density. However, we found that this relationship changes when an overpressure of up to 400kPa is applied to the sonication vessel, leading to more efficient emulsion production. Oil stability is unaffected by the sonication process.

Nature of amine-surfactant interactions at the air-solution interface

The surface tension and adsorption behavior of polymer/surfactant mixtures of polyethyleneimine (PEI)/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) is strongly dependent on pH. At both low and high pH, a strong PEI/SDS interaction gives rise to surface polymer/surfactant complex formation that results in significantly enhanced SDS adsorption at very low SDS concentrations and in multilayer formation at the interface. At low pH, this strong PEI/SDS interaction is dominated by the electrostatic attraction between the two oppositely charged species. However, at high pH the PEI is essentially neutral, and the origin of the "hydrophobic" interaction, or interaction of nonelectrostatic origin, is less clear. To investigate the origins of this interaction further, we have used neutron reflectivity and surface tension to study the pH dependence of the surface adsorption of different anionic surfactants-SDS, lithium dodecyl sulfate (LiDS), and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (LAS)--in the presence of a range of small amine molecules (from ethylenediamine to pentaethylenehexamine). Analogous to that observed in PEI/SDS mixtures, the presence of amine molecules induces a strong enhancement in the surfactant adsorption at both low and high pH, which can result in extreme cases in multilayer formation at the interface. At high pH, the adsorption is highly dependent upon the amine molecular weight and is equivalent to that observed at low pH by the time the molecular weight of the amine has increased to that of pentaethylenehexamine. We attribute this nonelectrostatic interaction observed at high pH to the combined effect of a dipole-dipole interaction between the sulfate (or sulfonate) headgroup and the amine nitrogens and a cooperative hydrophobic interaction between the chains of the attached surfactants. At high pH and when there are at least six amine groups present, this effect appears to be equivalent in strength to the electrostatic attraction that dominates at low pH. These results are significant in the context of understanding the unusual nature of the PEI/surfactant interaction and of using small molecular weight additives rather than much larger molecular weight polymers to manipulate adsorption properties.

Effects of aggregates on mixed adsorption layers of poly(ethylene imine) and sodium dodecyl sulfate at the air/liquid interface

We have exploited the spatial and kinetic resolution of ellipsometry to monitor the lateral movement of inhomogeneous patches of material in mixed adsorption layers of poly(ethylene imine) and sodium dodecyl sulfate at the air/liquid interface. We show that the choice of sample preparation methods can have a profound effect on the state of the interface for chemically equivalent samples. The extent of aggregation in the bulk solution on relevant time scales is affected by specific details of the polymer/surfactant mixing process, which produces varying numbers of aggregates that can become trapped in the interfacial layer, resulting in an enhanced and fluctuating ellipsometry signal. It can be beneficial to apply the surface-cleaning method of aspiration prior to physical measurements to remove trapped aggregates through the creation of a fresh interface. At low pH, the ellipsometry signal of samples prepared with surface cleaning is remarkably constant over a factor of >500 in the bulk composition below charge equivalence, which is discussed in terms of possible adsorption mechanisms. At high pH, through observing temporal fluctuations in the ellipsometry signal of samples prepared with surface cleaning, we reveal two important processes: there is the spontaneous adsorption of aggregates > 0.2 microm in diameter into the interfacial layer, and with time there is the fusion of smaller aggregates to generate new large surface aggregates. We attribute the favorability of the adsorption and fusion processes at high pH to reduced electrostatic barriers resulting from the low surface charge density of the aggregates. It is inappropriate in this case to consider the interface to comprise a homogeneous adsorption layer that is in dynamic equilibrium with the bulk solution. Our work shows that it can be helpful to consider whether there are macroscopic particles embedded in molecular layers at the air/liquid interface for systems where there is prior knowledge of aggregation in the bulk phase.

Impact of oil type on nanoemulsion formation and Ostwald ripening stability

The formation of stable transparent nanoemulsions poses two challenges: the ability to initially create an emulsion where the entire droplet size distribution is below 80 nm, and the subsequent stabilization of this emulsion against Ostwald ripening. The physical properties of the oil phase and the nature of the surfactant layer were found to have a considerable impact on nanoemulsion formation and stabilization. Nanoemulsions made with high viscosity oils, such as long chain triglycerides (LCT), were considerably larger ( D = 120 nm) than nanoemulsions prepared with low viscosity oils such as hexadecane ( D = 80 nm). The optimization of surfactant architecture, and differential viscosity eta D/eta C, has led to the formation of remarkably small nanoemulsions. With average sizes below 40 nm they are some of the smallest homogenized emulsions ever reported. What is more remarkable is that LCT nanoemulsions do not undergo Ostwald ripening and are physically stable for over 3 months. Ostwald ripening is prevented by the large molar volume of long chain triglyceride oils, which makes them insoluble in water thus providing a kinetic barrier to Ostwald ripening. Examination of the Ostwald ripening of mixed oil nanoemulsions found that the entropy gain associated with oil demixing provided a thermodynamic barrier to Ostwald ripening. Not only are the nanoemulsions created in this work some of the smallest reported, but they are also thermodynamically stable to Ostwald ripening when at least 50% of the oil phase is an insoluble triglyceride.

Implications of interfacial characteristics of food foaming agents in foam formulations

The manufacture of food dispersions (emulsions and foams) with specific quality attributes depends on the selection of the most appropriate raw materials and processing conditions. These dispersions being thermodynamically unstable require the use of emulsifiers (proteins, lipids, phospholipids, surfactants etc.). Emulsifiers typically coexist in the interfacial layer with specific functions in the processing and properties of the final product. The optimum use of emulsifiers depends on our knowledge of their interfacial physico-chemical characteristics - such as surface activity, amount adsorbed, structure, thickness, topography, ability to desorb (stability), lateral mobility, interactions between adsorbed molecules, ability to change conformation, interfacial rheological properties, etc. -, the kinetics of film formation and other associated physico-chemical properties at fluid interfaces. These monolayers constitute well defined systems for the analysis of food colloids at the micro- and nano-scale level, with several advantages for fundamental studies. In the present review we are concerned with the analysis of physico-chemical properties of emulsifier films at fluid interfaces in relation to foaming. Information about the above properties would be very helpful in the prediction of optimised formulations for food foams. We concluded that at surface pressures lower than that of monolayer saturation the foaming capacity is low, or even zero. A close relationship was observed between foaming capacity and the rate of diffusion of the foaming agent to the air-water interface. However, the foam stability correlates with the properties of the film at long-term adsorption.

Self-consistent field modeling of adsorption from polymer/surfactant mixtures

We report on the development of a self-consistent field model that describes the competitive adsorption of nonionic alkyl-(ethylene oxide) surfactants and nonionic polymer poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) from aqueous solutions onto silica. The model explicitly describes the response to the pH and the ionic strength. On an inorganic oxide surface such as silica, the dissociation of the surface depends on the pH. However, salt ions can screen charges on the surface, and hence, the number of dissociated groups also depends on the ionic strength. Furthermore, the solvent quality for the EO groups is a function of the ionic strength. Using our model, we can compute bulk parameters such as the average size of the polymer coil and the surfactant CMC. We can make predictions on the adsorption behavior of either polymers or surfactants, and we have made adsorption isotherms, i.e., calculated the relationship between the surface excess and its corresponding bulk concentration. When we add both polymer and surfactant to our mixture, we can find a surfactant concentration (or, more precisely, a surfactant chemical potential) below which only the polymer will adsorb and above which only the surfactant will adsorb. The corresponding surfactant concentration is called the CSAC. In a first-order approximation, the surfactant chemical potential has the CMC as its upper bound. We can find conditions for which CMC < CSAC . This implies that the chemical potential that the surfactant needs to adsorb is higher than its maximum chemical potential, and hence, the surfactant will not adsorb. One of the main goals of our model is to understand the experimental data from one of our previous articles. We managed to explain most, but unfortunately not all, of the experimental trends. At the end of the article we discuss the possibilities for improving the model.

Interactions between chitosan and SDS at a low-charged silica substrate compared to interactions in the bulk--the effect of ionic strength

The effect of ionic strength on association between the cationic polysaccharide chitosan and the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, has been studied in bulk solution and at the solid/liquid interface. Bulk association was probed by turbidity, electrophoretic mobility, and surface tension measurements. The critical aggregation concentration, cac, and the saturation binding of surfactants were estimated from surface tension data. The number of associated SDS molecules per chitosan segment exceeded one at both salt concentrations. As a result, a net charge reversal of the polymer-surfactant complexes was observed, between 1.0 and 1.5 mM SDS, independent of ionic strength. Phase separation occurs in the SDS concentration region where low charge density complexes form, whereas at high surfactant concentrations (up to several multiples of cmc SDS) soluble aggregates are formed. Ellipsometry and QCM-D were employed to follow adsorption of chitosan onto low-charged silica substrates, and the interactions between SDS and preadsorbed chitosan layers. A thin (0.5 nm) and rigid chitosan layer was formed when adsorbed from a 0.1 mM NaNO3 solution, whereas thicker (2 nm) chitosan layers with higher dissipation/unit mass were formed from solutions at and above 30 mM NaNO3. The fraction of solvent in the chitosan layers was high independent of the layer thickness and rigidity and ionic strength. In 30 mM NaNO3 solution, addition of SDS induced a collapse at low concentrations, while at higher SDS concentrations the viscoelastic character of the layer was recovered. Maximum adsorbed mass (chitosan + SDS) was reached at 0.8 times the cmc of SDS, after which surfactant-induced polymer desorption occurred. In 0.1 mM NaNO3, the initial collapse was negligible and further addition of surfactant lead to the formation of a nonrigid, viscoelastic polymer layer until desorption began above a surfactant concentration of 0.4 times the cmc of SDS.

Mixed system of Eudragit s-100 with a designed amphipathic peptide: control of interfacial elasticity by solution composition

We report an interfacially active system based on an informational peptide surfactant mixed with an oppositely charged polyelectrolyte. The 21-residue cationic peptide, AM1, has previously been shown to respond reversibly to pH and metal ions at fluid interfaces, forming elastic films that can be rapidly switched to collapse foams or emulsions on demand. Here we report the reversible association of AM1 with the methacrylate-based anionic polymer Eudragit S-100. The strength of the association, in bulk aqueous solution, is modulated by added metal ions and by ionic strength. Addition of zinc ions to the peptide-polymer system promotes complex formation and phase separation, while addition of a chelating agent reverses the association. The addition of salt weakens peptide-polymer interactions in the presence or absence of zinc. At the air-water interface, Eudragit S-100 forms an elastic mixed film with AM1 in the absence of metal, under conditions where the peptide alone does not show interfacial elasticity. When zinc is present, the elasticity of the mixed film is increased, but the rate of interfacial adsorption slows due to formation of peptide-polymer complexes in bulk solution. An understanding of these interactions can be used to identify favorable foam-forming conditions in the mixed system.

Dynamic surface properties of polyelectrolyte/surfactant adsorption films at the air/water interface: poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) and sodium dodecylsulfate

The dynamic surface elasticity, dynamic surface tension, and ellipsometric angles of mixed aqueous poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)/sodium dodecylsulfate solutions (PDAC/SDS) have been measured as a function of time and surfactant concentration. This system represents a typical example of polyelectrolyte/surfactant complex formation and subsequent aggregation on the nanoscale. The oscillating barrier and oscillating drop methods sometimes led to different results. The surface viscoelasticity of mixed PDAC/SDS solutions are very close to those of mixed solutions of sodium polystyrenesulfonate and dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide but different from the results for some other polyelectrolyte/surfactant mixtures. The abrupt drop in surface elasticity when the surfactant molar concentration approaches the concentration of charged polyelectrolyte monomers is caused by the formation of microparticles in the adsorption layer. Aggregate formation in the solution bulk does not influence the surface properties significantly, except for a narrow concentration range where the aggregates form macroscopic flocks. The mechanism of the observed relaxation process is controlled by the mass exchange between the surface layer and the flocks attached to the liquid surface.