Hairy-cell leukemia variant: recent view on diagnosis, biology and treatment

Immunoconjugates and new molecular targets in hairy cell leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a B-cell malignancy that in its classic form is exquisitely sensitive to single-agent purine analog therapy, but that is associated in many patients with late relapse and eventual purine analog resistance. Minimal residual disease, which is present in most patients achieving complete remission with purine analogs, retains Ags that are ideal for targeted therapy. Rituximab, which targets CD20, is active as a single agent, particularly if combined with purine analogs. Recombinant immunotoxins targeting either CD25 or CD22 and containing truncated Pseudomonas exotoxin have achieved major responses in relapsed/refractory HCL. Moxetumomab pasudotox in phase 1 testing achieved responses in 86% of such patients (complete in 46%) without dose limiting toxicity and often without MRD. Soluble CD22 has been used for improved detection and monitoring of HCL, particularly the poor-prognosis variant that lacks CD25. Ig rearrangements unique for each HCL patient have been cloned, sequenced, and followed by real-time quantitative PCR using sequence-specific reagents. Analysis of these rearrangements has identified an unmutated IGVH4-34-expressing poor-prognosis variant with immunophenotypic characteristics of either classic or variant HCL. The BRAF V600E mutation, reported in 50% of melanomas, is present in > 85% of HCL cases that are both classic and express rearrangements other than IGVH4-34, making HCL a potential target for specific inhibitors of BRAF V600E. Additional targets are being defined in both classic and variant HCL, which should improve both detection and therapy.

Both variant and IGHV4-34-expressing hairy cell leukemia lack the BRAF V600E mutation

Recently, the BRAF V600E mutation was reported in all cases of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) but not in other peripheral B-cell neoplasms. We wished to confirm these results and assess BRAF status in well-characterized cases of HCL associated with poor prognosis, including the immunophenotypically defined HCL variant (HCLv) and HCL expressing the IGHV4-34 immunoglobulin rearrangement. Fifty-three classic HCL (HCLc) and 16 HCLv cases were analyzed for BRAF, including 5 HCLc and 8 HCLv expressing IGHV4-34. BRAF was mutated in 42 (79%) HCLc, but wild-type in 11 (21%) HCLc and 16 (100%) HCLv. All 13 IGHV4-34(+) HCLs were wild-type. IGHV gene usage in the 11 HCLc BRAF wild-type cases included 5 IGHV4-34, 5 other, and 1 unknown. Our results suggest that HCLv and IGHV4-34(+) HCLs have a different pathogenesis than HCLc and that a significant minority of other HCLc are also wild-type for BRAF V600.

The pan-B cell marker CD22 is expressed on gastrointestinal eosinophils and negatively regulates tissue eosinophilia

CD22 is currently recognized as a B cell-specific Siglec and has been exploited therapeutically with humanized anti-CD22 mAb having been used against B cell leukemia. In this study, tissue-specific eosinophil mRNA microarray analysis identified that CD22 transcript levels of murine gastrointestinal (GI) eosinophils are 10-fold higher than those of lung eosinophils. To confirm the mRNA data at the protein level, we developed a FACS-based protocol designed to phenotype live GI eosinophils isolated from the murine lamina propria. Indeed, we found that jejunum eosinophils expressed remarkably high levels of surface CD22, similar to levels found in B cells across multiple mouse strains. In contrast, CD22 was undetectable on eosinophils from the colon, blood, thymus, spleen, uterus, peritoneal cavity, and allergen-challenged lung. Eosinophils isolated from newborn mice did not express CD22 but subsequently upregulated CD22 expression to adult levels within the first 10 d after birth. The GI lamina propria from CD22 gene-targeted mice harbored more eosinophils than wild type control mice, whereas the GI eosinophil turnover rate was unaltered in the absence of CD22. Our findings identify a novel expression pattern and tissue eosinophilia-regulating function for the "B cell-specific" inhibitory molecule CD22 on GI eosinophils.

Modern strategies for hairy cell leukemia

Enormous progress in the treatment of hairy cell leukemia over the last five decades has emerged as a result of organized clinical investigations. Although interferon represented one of the initial major therapeutic advances in the management of this disease in 1984, the subsequent introduction of purine nucleoside analogs (pentostatin and cladribine) changed the natural history of this rare disease by achieving a high rate of complete and durable remissions. The disease-free survival after effective therapy has not reached a plateau, suggesting control but not cure of the disease. Identification of minimal residual disease in patients achieving a complete hematologic remission provides insight into the potential source for predicting eventual relapse. Modern strategies of targeted therapies directed against immunophenotypic markers on the leukemic cells provide hope that improved long-term control of the disease is possible. Combined chemoimmunotherapy may hold the highest promise for disease eradication, but the optimal strategy for using this approach is under active investigation. Despite the perception by hematologists that this disease has already been conquered, there are critically important unanswered questions that remain. Investigation of the bone marrow microenvironment and its impact on minimal residual disease may ultimately prevent relapse. Consideration of the median age of patients at diagnosis combined with a substantial relapse rate mandates continued pursuit of improved therapy. The ultimate goal will be to achieve cure rather than simple control of the disease.