Borazjani A, Weed BC, Patnaik SS, Feugang JM, Christiansen D, Elder SH, Ryan PL, Liao J. A comparative biomechanical analysis of term fetal membranes in human and domestic species.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;
204:365.e25-36. [PMID:
21324430 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.003]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2010] [Revised: 11/17/2010] [Accepted: 12/01/2010] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to biomechanically characterize and compare human, porcine, equine, and ovine fetal membranes.
STUDY DESIGN
Noncontact metrology was used for topographic analyses. Uniaxial tensile testing was performed to resolve specific biomechanical values. Puncture force and radial stresses were determined with biaxial puncture testing. Microstructure and surface tortuosity were analyzed histologically.
RESULTS
Equine and human membranes sustained larger magnitude loading, but ovine and porcine membranes exhibited stronger material properties. Biaxial puncture validated uniaxial results; human and equine groups accommodated the largest loads but lowest stresses. Equine membranes were mostly vascularized; tortuosity was highest in porcine membranes. Species' gestation length was correlated positively with membrane thickness.
CONCLUSION
The anatomy of placentation and length of species gestation show distinct relationships to membrane biomechanics. Unlike other species, human fetal membranes do not compensate for structural weakness with a thicker membrane. This finding may explain the high incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes in humans.
Collapse