Spinal cord injury-related pain in rehabilitation: a cross-sectional study of relationships with cognitions, mood and physical function

Capturing the psychologic-personal perspective in spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE

The overall objective of this study was to illustrate a systematic approach for capturing the psychologic-personal perspective in International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based comprehensive research on spinal cord injury (SCI) in terms of what and how to measure. The specific aims were to identify (1) relevant areas of research for capturing the psychologic-personal factors in a study that is planned and conceptualized according to the comprehensive context of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, using SCI as a case in point; (2) a set of domains relevant for SCI research from a psychologic-personal perspective; and (3) suitable measurement instruments that can be considered for the assessment of those identified domains based on a set of predefined guiding principles.

DESIGN

The psychologic-personal factor structure was developed based on an item pool of 1246 entries from secondary analyses of available data from SCI studies. The domain set for psychologic-personal factors was identified through reviewing the scientific literature in PubMed and PsycInfo. The set of measurement instruments was collected using available measurement reviews, searches in the literature, instrument databases, and further sources and was selected using guiding principles.

RESULTS

Forty specific psychologic-personal factors, subdivided into seven areas of research, were identified: (1) sociodemographic personal characteristics, (2) the position in the immediate social and physical context, (3) personal history and biography, (4) feelings, (5) thoughts and beliefs, (6) motives, and (7) patterns of experience and behavior. The psychologic-personal factors domain set contains both cross-cutting outcome domains, namely quality-of-life, life satisfaction, subjective well-being, and sociodemographic personal characteristics, life events, positive and negative affect, perceived stress, locus of control, self-efficacy, purpose in life, coping, lifestyle, and personality. For each of the identified domains, a pool of measurement instruments was listed, and the application of predefined guiding principles for measurement instrument selection was exemplified for self-efficacy. It resulted in the selection of the General Self-Efficacy Scale by Schwarzer and Jerusalem (Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. pp. 35-37; 1995).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current article contributed to creating a transparent protocol for the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort study, coordinated by the Swiss Paraplegic Research in Nottwil, Switzerland. This article also stresses the relevance of the comprehensive approach to SCI and the consideration of the psychologic-personal perspective in this approach. The study, therefore, hopes to encourage scientists to use the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and the psychologic-personal perspective as a frame of reference for their research. Furthermore, the research reported in this article can inform the World Health Organization's future development of the personal factors classification in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Catastrophizing, pain, and pain interference in individuals with disabilities

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of sex and disability on catastrophizing, pain intensity, and pain interference in individuals with a spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey design was used. Two hundred forty-eight community-dwelling adults with a physical disability (spinal cord injury, n = 124; multiple sclerosis, n = 124) and chronic pain completed measures of demographic and clinical characteristics, pain intensity and interference, psychologic functioning, and pain catastrophizing.

RESULTS

Men reported marginally greater catastrophizing (P < 0.10) than did the women across both disability groups; however, there was no significant difference in catastrophizing between the disability groups. Catastrophizing was the only significant predictor of pain intensity in the multivariate regression analysis, with greater catastrophizing associated with greater pain. Pain intensity and catastrophizing were the only significant variables in the regression analyses predicting pain interference and psychologic functioning; as hypothesized, greater pain intensity and catastrophizing were associated with more pain interference and poorer psychologic functioning. There was also a trend (P < 0.10) for women, relative to men, to have a stronger association between catastrophizing and pain interference.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are consistent with a biopsychosocial conceptualization of pain and functioning in individuals with chronic pain secondary to a physical disability. In addition, these data suggest that assessment and treatment (when indicated) of catastrophizing should be a regular part of the clinical management of these patients.

Coexisting mechanical hypersensitivity and anxiety in a rat model of spinal cord injury and the effect of pregabalin, morphine, and midazolam treatment

Background and purpose

Spinal cord injury (SCI) has detrimental consequences that include chronic neuropathic pain, which is seen in 40-50% of patients, and symptoms of anxiety and depression, which affect 13-45% of SCI patients. The coexistence of pain, anxiety, and depression is known from other neuropathic pain conditions, but the relationship between these symptoms is not clear and has not been investigated in a preclinical model of SCI so far.

The aim of this study was to investigate anxiety-like behavior and at-level mechanical hypersensitivity following experimental spinal cord contusion (SCC) in female Sprague-Dawley rats, and the effects of analgesic and anxiolytic drugs.

Methods

Mechanical sensitivity and elevated plus maze (EPM) behavior were measured pre- and postinjury in SCC and sham animals. Pregabalin 30 mg/kg, morphine 3 mg/kg, midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, and 0.9% NaCl were evaluated in a randomly allocated, blinded balanced design.

Results

SCC animals developed persistent at-level mechanical hypersensitivity and decreased open arm activity in the EPM, which indicates an anxiety-like state. Pregabalin, a dual-acting analgesic and anxiolytic drug reduced both hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behavior, while the analgesic drug morphine only reduced hypersensitivity. The anxiolytic drug midazolam in the dose used had no effect on either parameter.

Conclusions

SCC animals developed long lasting coexisting at-level mechanical hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behavior, but there was no evidence to support a causal relationship between pain and anxiety following SCI.

Implications

The findings that at-level mechanical hypersensitivity and anxiety-like behavior develops concomitantly in the spinal cord contusion models and that both symptoms is persistent provide basis for further investigation of the mechanisms and connection behind these two clinically relevant symptoms after injury to the central nervous system.

Psychosocial factors and adjustment to chronic pain in persons with physical disabilities: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the research findings regarding the associations between psychosocial factors and adjustment to chronic pain in persons with physical disabilities.

DATA SOURCES

A key word literature search was conducted using articles listed in PubMed, PsychInfo, and CINAHL up to March 2010, and manual searches were made of all retrieved articles to identify published articles that met the review inclusion criteria.

STUDY SELECTION

To be included in the review, articles needed to (1) be written in English, (2) include adults with a physical disability who report having pain, (3) include at least 1 measure of a psychosocial predictor domain, (4) include at least 1 criterion measure of pain or patient functioning, and (5) report the results of associations between the psychosocial factors and criterion measures used in the study. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three reviewers tabulated study details and findings.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The disability groups studied included spinal cord injury (SCI), acquired amputation, cerebral palsy (CP), multiple sclerosis (MS), and muscular dystrophy (MD). Psychosocial factors were shown to be significantly associated with pain and dysfunction in all disability groups. The psychosocial factors most closely associated with pain and dysfunction across the samples included (1) catastrophizing cognitions; (2) task persistence, guarding, and resting coping responses; and (3) perceived social support and solicitous responding social factors. Pain-related beliefs were more strongly associated with pain and dysfunction in the SCI, CP, MS, and MD groups than in the acquired amputation group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support the importance of psychosocial factors as significant predictors of pain and functioning in persons with physical disabilities. Clinical trials to test the efficacy of psychosocial treatments for pain and dysfunction are warranted, as are studies to determine whether psychosocial factors have a causal influence on pain and adjustment in these populations.