Neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

Surgical management of advanced gastric cancer: An evolving issue

Worldwide, gastric cancer represents the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer deaths. Although the overall 5-year survival for resectable disease was more than 70% in Japan due to the implementation of screening programs resulting in detection of disease at earlier stages, in Western countries more than two thirds of gastric cancers are usually diagnosed in advanced stages reporting a 5-year survival rate of only 25.7%. Anyway surgical resection with extended lymph node dissection remains the only curative therapy for non-metastatic advanced gastric cancer, while neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapies can improve the outcomes aimed at the reduction of recurrence and extension of survival. High-quality research and advances in technologies have contributed to well define the oncological outcomes and have stimulated many clinical studies testing multimodality managements in the advanced disease setting. This review article aims to outline and discuss open issues in current surgical management of advanced gastric cancer.

Free intraperitoneal tumor cells and outcome in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Despite continuously improving therapies, gastric cancer still shows poor survival in locally advanced stages with local recurrence rates of up to 50% and peritoneal recurrence rates of 17% after curative surgery. We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses to clarify whether positive intraperitoneal cytology (IPC) indicates a high risk of disease recurrence and poor overall survival in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched in December 2014 to identify studies on the prognostic significance of positive intraperitoneal cytology in gastric cancer, including: Medline, Biosis, Science Citation Index, Embase, CCMed and publisher databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from the identified studies. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model on overall survival, disease-free survival and peritoneal recurrence free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies with a cumulative sample size of 12,883 patients were included. Cytology, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or both were performed in 35; 21 and 8 studies, respectively. Meta analyses revealed free intraperitoneal tumor cells (FITC) to be associated with poor overall survival in univariate (HR 3.27; 95% CI 2.82 - 3.78]) and multivariate (HR 2.45; 95% CI 2.04 - 2.94) analysis and poor peritoneal recurrence free survival in univariate (4.15; 95% CI 3.10 - 5.57) and multivariate (3.09; 95% CI 2.02 - 4.71) analysis. Subgroup analysis showed this effect to be independent of the detection method, Western or Asian origin or the time of publication.

CONCLUSIONS

FITC oder positive peritoneal cytology is associated with poor survival and increased peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer.

Comprehensive treatment for the peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer

Recently, a novel comprehensive treatment consisting of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative chemotherapy (POC) was developed for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM) with a curative intent. In the treatment, the macroscopic disease is completely removed by the peritonectomy techniques in combination with POC. This article reviews the results of the comprehensive treatment for PM from gastric cancer, and verifies the effects of CRS and POC, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Completeness of cytoreduction, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) less than the threshold levels after NAC, absence of ascites, cytologic status, pathologic response after NAC are the independent prognostic factors. Among these prognostic factors, PCI threshold level is the most valuable independent prognostic factor. After staging laparoscopy, patients with PM from gastric cancer are recommended to treat with NAC before CRS. After NAC, indication for CRS is determined by laparoscopy. The indications of the comprehensive treatment are patients with PCI less than the threshold levels, negative cytology, and responders after NAC. Patients satisfy these factors are the candidates for the CRS and HIPEC.

The Value of Palliative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Patients With Intraoperatively Proven Peritoneal Seeding

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding proven intraoperatively and to identify positive predictive factors for improving survival.The value of palliative resection for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis is controversial.From 2006 to 2013, 267 gastric cancer patients with intraoperatively identified peritoneal dissemination were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into resection group and nonresection group according to whether a palliative gastrectomy was performed. Clinicopathologic variables and survival were compared. Subgroup analyses stratified by clinicopathologic factors and multivariable analysis for overall survival were also performed.There were 114 patients in the resection group and 153 in nonresection group. The morbidities in the resection and nonresection groups were 14.91% and 5.88%, respectively (P = 0.014). There, however, was no difference in mortality between the 2 groups. The median survival time of patients in the resection group was longer than in nonresection group (14.00 versus 8.57 months, P = 0.000). The median survivals among the patients with different classifications of peritoneal metastasis were statistically significant (P = 0.000). Patients undergoing resection followed by chemotherapy had a significantly longer median survival, compared with that of patients who had chemotherapy alone, those who had resection alone, or those who had not received chemotherapy or resection (P = 0.000). Results of subgroup analyses showed that except for P3 patients and patients with multisite distant metastases, overall survival was significantly better in patients with palliative gastrectomy, compared with the nonresection group. In multivariate analysis, P3 disease (P = 0.000), absence of resection (P = 0.000), and lack of chemotherapy (P = 0.000) were identified as independently associated with poor survival.Palliative gastrectomy might be beneficial to the survival of gastric cancer patients with intraoperatively proven P1/P2 alone, rather than P3. Postoperative palliative chemotherapy could improve survival regardless of operation and should be recommended.

State-of-the-art methods in clinical diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and presents a very high mortality. The main reason for this situation is metastasis after curative resection, with the most common type being peritoneal metastasis, which accounts for more than 50% of all cases. Once peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) happens, the pathological stage is stage IV and there is a grim prognosis. Accordingly, early effective prevention and treatment of PC have extremely important clinical significance for the improvement of the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. This article describes the pathogenesis, clinical diagnosis using serum biomarkers and image examinations, as well as multimodality treatment of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer by neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy (NIPS), cytoreductive surgery+hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC), early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL), molecular targeting therapy, and usage of drug delivery systems.

Complete versus incomplete cytoreduction in peritoneal carcinosis from gastric cancer, with consideration to PCI cut-off. Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The completeness of cytoreduction has been considerated as fundamental in increasing the life expectancy in patients with peritoneal carcinosis (PC) in gastric cancer. However no definitive data about the real effect of complete cytoreduction (CC) have still been published. Moreover the PCI cut-off to attempt CC with a reasonable risk-benefit ratio still lacks.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis of trials of complete vs incomplete cytoreduction in patients with peritoneal carcinosis from GC was performed.

RESULTS

Nine trials have been included (748 patients: 417 with CC0-CC1 and 324 with CC2-CC3 cytoreduction). 1, 2, 3 and 5 years survival is favorable to CC0-CC1 (Risk Ratio: 2.41, 8.18, 8.66, and 7.96 respectively). CC0 vs. CC1 survival benefit at 1 and 3 years: RR 2.28 and 6.36 respectively, favoring CC0. 1, 2, 3 and 5 years survival changes significantly above and below a PCI of 12.

CONCLUSIONS

1, 2, 3 and 5-year overall survival is increased by CC0-CC1 cytoreduction in patients with PC from gastric origin. Moreover CC0 increases the 1 and 3 years survival when compared to CC1 cytoreduction.

The result of conversion surgery in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding

Purpose

Palliative gastrectomy and chemotherapy are important options for peritoneal seeding of gastric cancer. The treatment stage IV gastric cancer patient who respond to induction chemotherapy, is converted to gastrectomy (conversion therapy or conversion surgery). This study explored the clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding who had undergone conversion therapy.

Materials and Methods

Between 2003 and 2012, gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding, as determined by preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with peritoneal seeding were analyzed.

Results

Forty-three patients were enrolled. Eighteen patients had undergone conversion surgery and 25 patients continued conventional chemotherapy. Among the 18 conversion patients, 10 received clinically curative resection. The median follow-up period was 28.5 months (range 8 to 60 months) and the total 3-year survival rate was 16.3%. The median survival time of the patients who received clinically curative conversion therapy was 37 months, and the 3-year survival rate was 50%. The median follow-up for non-curative gastrectomy patients was 18 months. No patient treated using chemotherapy survived to 3 years; the median survival time was 8 months. The differences in survival time between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.001).

Conclusions

In terms of survival benefits for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding, clinically curative conversion therapy resulted in better clinical outcomes.

Peritoneal cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

In the past, peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) was considered as a final stage of cancer, and patients were offered the best supportive care. Recently, a new therapeutic alternative approach based on the combination of surgery with chemotherapy was developed. In this curative intent, the macroscopic disease was treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with perioperative chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the mechanisms of the formation of PSM, quantitative estimation of PSM and residual disease, multimodal treatment, value of laparoscopy, prognostic factors and patients' selection for the multimodal therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent studies show that CRS plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy applications confer prolonged survival in patients with PSM from colorectal, gastric, ovarian, appendiceal mucinous carcinoma and diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. The comprehensive treatment is now justified as state-of-the-art for patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Clinical significance of cytological status of peritoneal lavage fluid during intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with overt peritoneal dissemination

BACKGROUND

A positive cytology of peritoneal lavage fluid (CY1) is a poor prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer (GC). We have recently reported that CY1 often changes to negative (CY0) following combination chemotherapy including intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel (PTX), which results in marked prolongation of survival in GC patients with peritoneal dissemination (P1).

METHODS

A total of 95 P1 GC patients who received combination chemotherapy with S-1 and intravenous and IP PTX were enrolled. Peritoneal lavage fluid was periodically examined cytologically at the start of every cycle of chemotherapy, and the impact of CY status on patient outcome was retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-three (76.8%) of 95 patients were diagnosed as CY1 before initial treatment. Median survival time (MST) of the CY1 group was significantly shorter than that of the CY0 group (19.1 vs. 32.5 months, P = 0.033). Cytological status changed from CY1 to CY0 in 68 (93.2%) of 73 CY1 patients during the whole treatment period and MST of patients who showed a negative change was significantly longer than that of the unchanged group (20.0 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.0017). In 64 patients who achieved CY0 by IP PTX regimen, the median time to achieve CY0 was 1.4 months, and patients who achieved a negative change within 1 month showed a particularly good outcome (MST = 26.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Periodic cytological examination of peritoneal lavage fluid is clinically useful to evaluate the efficacy of treatment as well as to predict the outcome of patients with P1 GC.

What make differences in the outcome of adjuvant treatments for resected gastric cancer?

After a long history of Dark Age of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, definite evidences of survival benefit from adjuvant treatment have been reported since 2000s. These survival benefits are likely attributed to something new approach different from pervious studies. In 2001, South West Oncology Group INT0116 trial yielded survival benefit in curatively resected gastric cancer patients with postoperative chemoradiotherapy [5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + Leucovorin + radiotherapy], followed by positive result by MAGIC Trial, employing peri-operative(pre- and postoperative chemotherapy with Epirubicin, cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (ECF) regimen in patients with curative resection. A novel drug [S1: ACTS-GC (Adjuvant chemotherapy trial of TS-1 for gastric cancer) in 2007], or new drug combination chemotherapys [CDDP + 5-FU: FNCLCC/FFCD (Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le cancer/Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive) in 2011, Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin: CLASSIC in 2012] also produced positive results in terms of improved prognosis. Neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy, novel anti-cancer drugs, and chemoradiotherapy might be the key words to develop further improvement in the adjuvant treatment of resectable gastric cancer. Moreover, it is not new but still true to stress the importance of D2 surgery as the baseline treatment in order to minimize the amount of residual tumor after surgery.

Combined use of lysyl oxidase, carcino-embryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigens improves the sensitivity of biomarkers in predicting lymph node metastasis and peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine whether lysyl oxidase (LOX) is a useful marker of metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) patients in combination with tumor markers carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125). There were 215 GC patients (67 without metastasis, 102 with lymph node metastasis, and 46 with peritoneal metastasis) who presented to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between May 2009 and November 2012 that were enrolled in this study. The LOX expression level and the serum concentration of the four tumor markers were evaluated preoperatively. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) before surgery. Statistical analysis, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC) analysis, and logistic regression analysis, was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of these markers in predicting metastasis in GC. For predicting lymph node metastasis in GC, the sensitivity of LOX, CEA, CA724, CA199, and CA125 was 44.12, 12.75, 21.57, 23.53, and 15.69 %, respectively, and increased to 79.41 % in combination. For predicting peritoneal metastasis in GC, the sensitivity of these markers was 56.52, 23.91, 34.78, 36.96, and 34.78 %, respectively, and increased to 91.30 % in combination. Combining LOX with CEA, CA724, CA199, and CA125 could increase the sensitivity of predicting lymph nodes metastasis and peritoneal metastasis in GC. Surgeons can use these markers to determine the best treatment options for patients. Additional large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies are urgently needed to further confirm the results of this study.

Carcinoma stomach: unwanted chemotherapeutic success: a case vignette

A 45-years-old male, chronic smoker and occasional alcoholic, from Tamenlong district of Manipur was admitted to the department of Surgery, RIMS, Imphal on 19(th) August, 2011. He was diagnosed as a case of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach located at incissura along the lesser curvature. CT scan of abdomen had revealed para-aortic, aorto-caval and celiac lymphadenopathy. Patient had undergone 5 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 3 weekly course of Oxaloplatin 80mg(D1) + epirubicin 200mg (D1) + Capicitabine 2000mg(D1-D14). After 1 month of chemotherapy, patient then underwent subtotal gastrectomy (modified D2 resection) without any significant peri-operative complication. Surprisingly, the final histopathological report of the resected specimen didnx't reveal any evidence of malignancy in any sections. Role of chemotherapy in gastric cancers has been an adjunct to surgery and the optimal drugs regimen has not been elucidated so far. Till now, very few cases of carcinoma stomach which show pathological complete response have been reported. Our case is such a rare case of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Drug development for intraperitoneal chemotherapy against peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal cancer

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastrointestinal cancer has been investigated and applied clinically for several decades. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have been considered to be the optimal treatment options for selected patients with colorectal and gastric cancers with PC. Accumulating evidence suggests that the administration of IP paclitaxel for patients with PC from gastric cancer may improve the patient survival. The pharmacokinetics of such treatment should be considered to optimize IP chemotherapy. In addition, newly emerging molecular-targeted therapies and research into new drug delivery systems, such as nanomedicine or controlled absorption/release methods, are essential to improve the effects of IP chemotherapy. This review summarizes the current status and future prospects of IP chemotherapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.

Test execution variation in peritoneal lavage cytology could be related to poor diagnostic accuracy and stage migration in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Peritoneal lavage cytology is part of the routine staging workup for patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, no quality assurance study has been conducted to show variations or biases in peritoneal lavage cytology results. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a test execution variation in peritoneal lavage cytology between investigating surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was designed for determination of the positive rate of peritoneal lavage cytology using a liquid-based preparation method in patients with potentially curable advanced gastric cancer (cT2~4/N0~2/M0). One hundred thirty patients were enrolled and underwent laparotomy, peritoneal lavage cytology, and standard gastrectomy, which were performed by 3 investigating surgeons. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The overall positive peritoneal cytology rate was 10.0%. Subgroup positive rates were 5.3% in pT1 cancer, 2.0% in pT2/3 cancer, 11.1% in pT4a cancer, and 71.4% in pT4b cancer. In univariate analysis, positive peritoneal cytology showed significant correlation with pT stage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, ascites, and the investigating surgeon. We found the positive rate to be 2.1% for surgeon A, 10.2% for surgeon B, and 20.6% for surgeon C (P=0.024). Multivariate analysis identified pT stage, ascites, and the investigating surgeon to be significant risk factors for positive peritoneal cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

The peritoneal lavage cytology results were significantly affected by the investigating surgeon, providing strong evidence of test execution variation that could be related to poor diagnostic accuracy and stage migration in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Outcome data of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric origin treated by a strategy of bidirectional chemotherapy prior to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a single specialized center in Japan

BACKGROUND

Management of peritoneal disseminated gastric cancer (GC) remains a challenging problem. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcome of bidirectional induction chemotherapy [bidirectional intraperitoneal and systemic induction chemotherapy (BIPSC)] in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) arising from GC who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall, 194 patients with PC arising from GC were treated with BIPSC comprising intraperitoneal docetaxel at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) and cisplatin at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) followed by four cycles of oral S-1 at a dose of 60 mg/m(2). CRS and HIPEC were performed in responders to BIPSC.

RESULTS

Of these 194 patients, 152 (78.3 %) underwent CRS and HIPEC between January 2005 and December 2012. Treatment-related mortality was 3.9 %, and major complications occurred in 23.6 % of patients. The median survival rate was 15.8 months, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates of 66, 32 and 10.7 %, respectively, in the patients treated with combined treatment. Multivariate analysis identified pathologic response to BIPSC (p = 0.001), low tumor burden [peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤ 6] (p = 0.001), and completeness of CRS (CC-0, CC-1) (p = 0.001) as independent predictors for a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

As a viable option, BIPSC with CRS and HIPEC for patients with PC arising from GC may be performed safely, with acceptable morbidity and mortality, in a specialized unit. Response to BIPSC, optimal CRS and limited peritoneal dissemination seem to be essential to achieve the best outcomes in these patients.

Pharmacology of cancer chemotherapy drugs for hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer

The peritoneal parietal and visceral surfaces of the abdomen and pelvis are an important anatomic site for the dissemination of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The transcoelomic spread of cancer cells gives rise to peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) which, without special treatments, is a fatal manifestation of EOC. In order to control PC cytoreductive surgery to remove macroscopic disease is combined with perioperative intraperitoneal (IP) and perioperative intravenous chemotherapy to eradicate microscopic residual disease. Chemotherapy agents are selected to be administered by the IP or intravenous route based on their pharmacologic properties. A peritoneal-plasma barrier which retards the clearance of high molecular weight chemotherapy from the peritoneal cavity results in a large exposure of small cancer nodules on abdominal and pelvic surfaces. Tissue penetration is facilitated by moderate hyperthermia (41-42 °C) of the IP chemotherapy solution. Timing of the chemotherapy as a planned part of the surgical procedure to maximize exposure of all peritoneal surfaces is crucial to success.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with gastric cancer, and the role for surgical resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to create a model of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with gastric cancer and to evaluates outcomes in patients with gastric cancer treated using surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

A single-institution cohort of patients with gastric cancer was analyzed according to the development of gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (GCPC). Variables were evaluated using regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate outcomes after surgical resection, cytoreductive surgery, and HIPEC.

RESULTS

Age ≤60 years and local tumor stage (T3/T4) were significantly associated with GCPC (odds ratio, 3.95 and 3.94, respectively). Thirty-six-month survival was 57% for patients without peritoneal disease and 39% for patients with GCPC. There was no significant trend of improved survival after surgical management or HIPEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Age ≤60 years and T3/T4 tumor stage are risk factors for GCPC. Intermediate-term survival of patients with GCPC treated with surgical resection or cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC was not improved, though future research should address the possible benefits of aggressive approaches to the treatment of GCRC.

Indikationen und Resultate der Peritonektomie bei nichtkolorektaler Peritonealkarzinose

<b><i>Hintergund:</i></b> In dieser Übersichtsarbeit soil der Stellenwert der zytoreduktiven chirurgischen Therapie (CRS) in Kombination mit einer hyperthermen intraperitonealen Chemotherapie (HIPEC) der Peritonealkarzinose bei nichtkolorektalen Karzinomen dargestellt werden. Hierzu zählen als primäre Tumoren des Peritoneums das Mesotheliom und das Pseudomyxoma peritonei. Zu den wichtigsten sekundären malignen Erkrankungen des Peritoneums zählen die Peritonealkarzinose des Magenkarzinoms, des Pankreaskarzinoms und des Ovarialkarzinoms sowie die Sarkomatose. <b><i>Methode:</i></b> Pathologische Besonderheiten der einzelnen Entitäten und Therapieempfehlungen anhand der aktuellen Literatur werden im Einzelnen beschrieben. <b><i>Ergebnisse:</i></b> Prinzipiell ist die chirurgische Behandlung der Peritonealkarzinose im Sinne einer CRS in Kombination mit einer HIPEC ein sinnvolles Therapiekonzept - vorausgesetzt, dass eine nahezu komplette Tumorentfernung erzielt werden kann. <b><i>Schlussfolgerung: </i></b>Aufgrund der erhöhten Morbidität sollte ein chirurgischer Eingriff gut indiziert sein. Bei ausgewählten Patienten ist eine CRS der Peritonealkarzinose in Kombination mit einer HIPEC ein sinnvolles und lebensverlängerndes Verfahren.

Effects of neoadjuvant intraperitoneal/systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional chemotherapy) for the treatment of patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer

Novel multidisciplinary treatment combined with neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy protocol (NIPS) and peritonectomy was developed. Ninety-six patients were enrolled. Peritoneal wash cytology was performed before and after NIPS through a port system. Patients were treated with 60 mg/m(2) of oral S-1 for 21 days, followed by a 1-week rest. On days 1, 8, and 15, 30 mg/m(2) of Taxotere and 30 mg/m(2) of cisplatin with 500 mL of saline were introduced through the port. NIPS is done 2 cycles before surgery. Three weeks after NIPS, 82 patients were eligible to intend cytoreductive surgery (CRS) by gastrectomy + D2 dissection + periotnectomy to achieve complete cytoreduction. Sixty-eight patients showed positice cytology before NIPS, and the positive cytology results became negative in 47 (69%) patients after NIPS. Complete pathologic response on PC after NIPS was experienced in 30 (36.8%) patients. Stage migration was experienced in 12 patients (14.6%). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 58 patients (70.7%). By the multivariate analysis, complete cytoreduction and pathologic response became a significantly good survival. However the high morbidity and mortality, stringent patient selection is important. The best indications of the therapy are patients with good pathologic response and PCI ≤ 6, which are supposed to be removed completely by peritonectomy.

Pharmacokinetics of the perioperative use of cancer chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy patients

Background. The peritoneal surface is an acknowledged locoregional failure site of abdominal malignancies. Previous treatment attempts with medical therapy alone did not result in long-term survival. During the last two decades, new treatment protocols combining cytoreductive surgery with perioperative intraperitoneal and intravenous cancer chemotherapy have demonstrated very encouraging clinical results. This paper aims to clarify the pharmacologic base underlying these treatment regimens. Materials and Methods. A review of the current pharmacologic data regarding these perioperative chemotherapy protocols was undertaken. Conclusions. There is a clear pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic rationale for perioperative intraperitoneal and intravenous cancer chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy patients.

Intraoperative hyperthermic versus postoperative normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colonic peritoneal carcinomatosis: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy has improved prognosis in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The main modes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment are peroperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and normothermic sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (SPIC). The aim of this study was to compare HIPEC and SPIC with respect to overall survival, disease-free survival, morbidity, and mortality in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A matched case-control study was conducted in patients with surgical macroscopic complete removal of carcinomatosis; matching was according to the peritoneal cancer index score. Thirty-two patients were included, 16 in each group (HIPEC and SPIC). Overall survival, disease-free survival, morbidity, mortality, and clinicopathological parameters were compared.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 36.5 months in the HIPEC group and 23.9 months in the SPIC group (P = 0.01). Median disease-free survival for these groups was 22.8 (HIPEC) and 13.0 months (SPIC; P = 0.02). Morbidity was not statistically different, 19% in SPIC and 37% in HIPEC. Postoperative mortality was observed in one patient in each group.

CONCLUSION

HIPEC was associated with improved overall survival and disease-free survival compared with SPIC at similar morbidity and mortality, suggesting that HIPEC is the treatment of choice in colonic peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Clinical outcomes according to primary treatment in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding

Purpose

Peritoneal seeding of gastric cancer is known to have a poor prognosis. With the diagnosis of peritoneal seeding, there is no effective treatment modality. Gastrectomy with chemotherapy or primary chemotherapy is basically one of major options for this condition. This study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of these treatments and to identify the better way to improve the prognosis of patients with peritoneal seeding.

Materials and Methods

Between 2001 and 2007, gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding by preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively. The enrolled patients were divided as primary gastrectomy and primary chemotherapy group. Clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical outcomes of groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

Fifty-four patients were enrolled. 21 patients belonged to the group of primary gastrectomy and 33 patients were to the primary chemotherapy group. Among 33 patients of the primary chemotherapy group, 17 patients were received only chemotherapy and 16 patients were received gastrectomy due to the good responses of primary chemotherapy. The 3 years survival rates were 14% in primary gastrectomy group, 55% in patients who received gastrectomy after primary chemotherapy, and 0% in patients with primary chemotherapy only.

Conclusions

Although this study had many limitations, some valuable information was produced. In terms of survival benefits for the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding, primary gastrectomy and additional gastrectomy after primary chemotherapy revealed the better clinical outcomes. But, prospective randomized clinical study and multi-center study are should be performed to decide proper treatment for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding.

Systematic review of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis has a poor prognosis. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been proposed as a treatment option. This systematic review examined recent literature to determine the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched between January 2004 and January 2010 for relevant studies. Defined outcomes of interest were treatment-related morbidity and mortality, long-term survival and sites of recurrence.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified involving 914 patients with gastric cancer, of whom 819 (89·6 per cent) received intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There were two randomized controlled trials, two case-control studies and ten observational studies. Methodological quality was rated as poor in 12 studies, with selection and observer bias apparent in most non-randomized cohorts. Studies were often small and varied in terms of intraperitoneal timing of chemotherapy, chemotherapeutic agents, treatment temperature, and the use of adjuvant therapies. In the better conducted studies, survival was longer in patients receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy and surgery than in those having surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

There is limited good-quality evidence to determine the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer is worthy of further appraisal. However, the quality of trials must be improved, and studies must be conducted more uniformly to minimize bias and aid comparison between centres.

Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel for the radical surgical treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer: a prospective pilot study

PURPOSE

The admitted benefits of intraperitoneal chemotherapy during postoperative administration for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian origin are limited by their associated morbidity and restricted diffusion by the presence of multiple intra-abdominal adherences. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the security, effectiveness, and cytoreduction optimization of intraperitoneal paclitaxel administration previously to radical surgery/peritonectomy/HIPEC (hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy) either in monotherapy or combined with intravenous carboplatin.

METHODS

Prospective pilot study of 10 patients with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis in stage IIIc-FIGO without previous treatment. After staging of the diseases by laparoscopy, five patients received paclitaxel by weekly intraperitoneal administration (60 mg/m(2), 10 cycles), and other five patients additionally received intravenous carboplatin every 21 days (AUC 6, 4 cycles). Subsequently radical surgery/peritonectomy with HIPEC was performed.

RESULTS

The presence of moderate abdominal pain was the most common (70%) side effect associated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel intraperitoneal administration. The intravenous carboplatin administration was not associated with significant increase in adverse effects. It boosted intraperitoneal paclitaxel-associated antitumoral activity with a high average decrease in Index Cancer Peritoneal (21.2 vs. 14.4, P = 0.066) and CA 125(1,053 vs. 346, P = 0.043). All the patients who received combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy obtained R0 cytoreduction. Five-year overall survival was 62%.

CONCLUSIONS

The intraperitoneal paclitaxel weekly administration combined with intravenous carboplatin administration prior to radical surgery/peritonectomy with HIPEC is a safe and effective option in the treatment of ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis. This study shows the possibility to investigate other forms of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and their combinations thoroughly.

Updating controversies on the multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer

The rates of relapse and death remain high in gastric cancer patients, especially in advanced stages. Local relapses in the tumour bed and regional lymph nodes, peritoneal spread as abdominal carcinomatosis, and distant metastasis are common mechanisms of failure after a R0 resection. To overcome this, a multidisciplinary approach has been prompted. In recent years, multidisciplinary treatment has been strengthened by some randomised controlled trials and it is now considered the standard by most groups, although the improvement in long-term survival rates achieved is still limited. This new therapeutic approach in gastric cancer is rapidly evolving and has led to a series of controversies on the best strategy to follow. Some of these controversies are discussed in this paper.

Unresectable gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction and distant metastasis responding to intraperitoneal and folfox chemotherapy after palliative laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy: report of a case

Background

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by unresectable gastric cancer is a challenging aspect of patient care. There have been no reports involving patients with obstructing gastric cancer and several incurable factors curatively treated by multimodal treatments.

Case presentation

We report a case of 55-year-old man who was diagnosed with a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in the pre-pyloric antrum with GOO by gastroscopy. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed thickening of the gastric wall and adjacent fat infiltration, and a large amount of food in the stomach suggesting a passage disturbance, enlarged lymph nodes along the common hepatic and left gastric arteries, and multiple hepatic metastases. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was 343 ng/ml and the carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level was within normal limits. The patient underwent a laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for palliation of the GOO. On the 3^rd and 12^th days after surgery, he received intraperitoneal chemotherapy with 40 mg of docetaxel and 150 mg of carboplatin. Simultaneously, combined chemotherapy with 85 mg/m² of oxaliplatin for the 1^st day and 600 mg/m² of 5-FU for 2 days (FOLFOX regimen) was administered from the 8^th post-operative day. After completion of nine courses of FOLFOX, the patient achieved a complete response (CR) with complete disappearance of the primary tumor and the metastatic foci. He underwent a radical subtotal gastrectomy with D3 lymph node dissection 4 months after the initial palliative surgery. The pathologic results revealed no residual primary tumor and no lymph node metastasis in 43 dissected lymph nodes. He has maintained a CR for 18 months since the last operation.

Conclusion

Combination chemotherapy with systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy following laparoscopic bypass surgery showed marked efficacy in the treatment for unresectable advanced gastric cancer with GOO.

Surgical treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer

This review describes the latest surgical treatments for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) arising from gastric cancer. Systemic chemotherapy is less effective against PC because of the existence of the blood-peritoneal barrier. Accordingly, perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy plus cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is a new trend of multidisciplinary therapy for PC. Intraperitoneally administered drugs penetrate directly into the peritoneal dissemination, resulting in the high loco-regional intensity of drugs. A new bidirectional chemotherapy called neoadjuvant intraperitoneal/systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) has been developed. After NIPS, the disappearance of PFCCs has been reported, and the incidence of complete cytoreduction has increased accordingly. Complete cytoreduction, a low peritoneal carcinomatosis index, and negative PFCCs are significant favorable prognostic factors. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after CRS is associated with improved survival with an acceptable postoperative mortality and morbidity. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) has also contributed to improving survival after CRS.

Prognostic significance of free peritoneal tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing potentially curative resection

BACKGROUND

Free peritoneal tumor cells (FPTCs) are an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can eliminate FPTCs in the peritoneal lavage remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of NAC on FPTCs.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2000, data from a total of 61 patients with resectable gastric cancer were analyzed. Peritoneal cytology was performed before NAC at laparoscopy and at tumor resection. A minimum of 6 weeks of NAC, consisting of cisplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil, was administered. FPTCs were detected immunohistochemically with Ber-EP4 antibody.

RESULTS

No FPTCs could be detected in 42 patients (69%), compared to 19 (31%) with FPTCs before NAC. During chemotherapy, 10 (24%) of 42 patients developed FPTCs, and 7 (37%) of 19 patients reverted from positive to negative. Patients who became FPTC negative (n = 7) showed an improved median survival (36.1 months) and a longer 2-year survival (71.4%) compared to FPTC-positive patients before and after NAC (n = 12), with a median survival of 9.2 months and a 2-year survival rate of 25%. In contrast, patients who reverted from FPTC negative to positive during NAC (n = 10) had a median survival of 18.5 months and a 2-year survival of only 20%. Multivariate analysis identified ypN category and FPTC change as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC for patients with positive cytology could lead to FPTC negativity in a subset of patients and improve their prognosis. However, NAC might be a risky strategy for almost one-quarter of patients whose disease develops positive cytology.

Multidisciplinary therapy for treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer

There is no standard treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastric cancer. A novel multidisciplinary treatment combining bidirectional chemotherapy [neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy protocol (NIPS)], peritonectomy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been developed. In this article, we assess the indications, safety and efficacy of this treatment, review the relevant studies and introduce our experiences. The aims of NIPS are stage reduction, the eradication of peritoneal free cancer cells, and an increased incidence of complete cytoreduction (CC-0) for PC. A complete response after NIPS was obtained in 15 (50%) out of 30 patients with PC. Thus, a significantly high incidence of CC-0 can be obtained in patients with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤ 6. Using a multivariate analysis to examine the survival benefit, CC-0 and NIPS are identified as significant indicators of a good outcome. However, the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with peritonectomy and perioperative chemotherapy make stringent patient selection important. The best indications for multidisciplinary therapy are localized PC (PCI ≤ 6) from resectable gastric cancer that can be completely removed during a peritonectomy. NIPS and complete cytoreduction are essential treatment modalities for improving the survival of patients with PC from gastric cancer.

Multidisciplinary therapy for treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer

There is no standard treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastric cancer. A novel multidisciplinary treatment combining bidirectional chemotherapy [neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy protocol (NIPS)], peritonectomy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been developed. In this article, we assess the indications, safety and efficacy of this treatment, review the relevant studies and introduce our experiences. The aims of NIPS are stage reduction, the eradication of peritoneal free cancer cells, and an increased incidence of complete cytoreduction (CC-0) for PC. A complete response after NIPS was obtained in 15 (50%) out of 30 patients with PC. Thus, a significantly high incidence of CC-0 can be obtained in patients with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤ 6. Using a multivariate analysis to examine the survival benefit, CC-0 and NIPS are identified as significant indicators of a good outcome. However, the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with peritonectomy and perioperative chemotherapy make stringent patient selection important. The best indications for multidisciplinary therapy are localized PC (PCI ≤ 6) from resectable gastric cancer that can be completely removed during a peritonectomy. NIPS and complete cytoreduction are essential treatment modalities for improving the survival of patients with PC from gastric cancer.

A pharmacological review on intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy

Perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in combination with cytoreductive surgery has been shown to be of benefit for treating selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. It has become a new standard of care in the management of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma and peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal malignancy. Numerous recent publications on carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer and gastric cancer identify groups of patients that would benefit from this local-regional approach for prevention and treatment of carcinomatosis. This review focuses on pharmacological information regarding intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic agents commonly used in gastrointestinal oncology.

Pharmacologic rationale for treatments of peritoneal surface malignancy from colorectal cancer

The peritoneal surfaces of the abdomen and pelvis are important sites for the dissemination of gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancy. Transcoelomic dissemination of cancer cells gives rise to carcinomatosis, which, without special treatment, is a fatal manifestation of these diseases. To treat peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive surgery removes gross disease plus perioperative intraperitoneal and perioperative intravenous chemotherapy eradicates microscopic residual disease and chemical compatibilities. Chemotherapy agents are administered either by the intraperitoneal or intravenous route, based on their pharmacologic properties. A peritoneal-plasma barrier, which retards the clearance of high molecular weight chemotherapy from the peritoneal cavity, results in a large exposure of small cancer nodules on abdominal and pelvic surfaces. Tissue penetration of the intraperitoneal chemotherapy is facilitated by moderate hyperthermia (41-42°C). Targeting of intravenous chemotherapy to the peritoneal surface is facilitated by the intraperitoneal heat. A constant dose of chemotherapy agent and volume of carrier solution, based on body surface area, allows prediction of systemic drug exposure and systemic toxicity. Timing of the hyperthermic chemotherapy as a scheduled part of the surgical procedure to uniformly expose all peritoneal surfaces is crucial to success.

Induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery for treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination is poor. Recently, chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin has been shown to be highly effective for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

In 41 patients diagnosed with either macro- or microscopic peritoneal dissemination by staging laparoscopy, and receiving induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin between August 2002 and February 2008, response of peritoneal lesions to the induction chemotherapy and the outcome of the following surgery were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 41 patients identified, 38 patients (93%) completed two cycles. Among grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, neutropenia was most frequently observed (9 patients; 22%). After chemotherapy, 32 patients (78%) underwent surgery and R0 resection was accomplished in 22 patients. Although objective response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was recorded in only four patients (10%), peritoneal dissemination disappeared in 19 patients (46%). Patients with limited peritoneal metastasis, negative peritoneal cytology, or response of the primary lesion were more likely to exhibit disappearance of the peritoneal dissemination. Median survival time of all patients was 20.4 months. Patients with R0 resection had median survival time of 43.2 months, which was significantly longer than for those with noncurative resection (12.6 months) or without surgery (10.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited peritoneal dissemination of gastric origin is highly sensitive to induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin. Resection after disappearance of peritoneal metastasis could cure some patients.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of perioperative cancer chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy

The peritoneal surface remains an important failure site for patients with gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. During the last 2 decades, novel therapeutic approaches, combining cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative intracavitary and intravenous chemotherapy, have emerged for peritoneal carcinomatosis patients. This has resulted in remarkable clinical successes in contrast with prior failures. Although further clinical data from phase II and III trials supporting this combined treatment protocols are necessary, an optimalization of the wide variety of different perioperative cancer chemotherapy protocols used in these treatment regimens is equally important. To this date, a clear understanding of the pharmacology of perioperative chemotherapy is still lacking. The efficacy of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapy protocols is governed as much by nonpharmacokinetic variables (tumor nodule size, density, vascularity, interstitial fluid pressure, and binding) as by the pharmacokinetic variables (dose, volume, duration, pressure, and carrier solution). Our recent data support the importance of the tumor nodule as the most meaningful pharmacologic end point. Timing of perioperative intravenous chemotherapy may substantially influence the pharmacokinetics. This review aims to clarify the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data currently available regarding the intraperitoneal delivery of cancer chemotherapy agents in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Recent results of therapy for scirrhous gastric cancer

The prognosis of patients with scirrhous gastric cancer (SGC) is extremely poor. However, recent advances in therapeutic strategies against SGC, using effective anticancer drugs, have prolonged the survival of patients with SGC. This paper reviews the recent therapeutic outcomes of this type of gastric cancer and introduces a new treatment protocol for SGC.

Prognostic significance of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The prognostic value of cytological examination of intraoperative washings in potentially resectable gastric cancer is controversial.

METHODOLOGY

Between February 1993 and August 2001, clinicopathological features and surgical outcome of 26 consecutive patients with gastric cancer with positive cytological findings of peritoneal washings without peritoneal dissemination were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall 1, 2, 3-year survival rates for 26 patients were 69%, 35%, and 0%, respectively. The median survival was 17.5 months. The median survival of patients with curative resection (n=16) and non-curative resection (n=10) was 19 months and 12.5 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between curative resection and non-curative resection (p=0.10). Recurrent disease frequently occurred as peritoneal dissemination (69%). No patient survived for more than 34 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive surgical resections do not provide any survival benefit for gastric cancer with positive cytological findings of peritoneal washings even in the absence of peritoneal dissemination.

Pilot study of intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel and oral S-1 for patients with peritoneal metastasis due to advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no standard treatment for peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer. A novel combination chemotherapy has been introduced for patients with advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

This pilot study was performed on four patients to confirm safety and efficacy. They were diagnosed with unresectable gastric cancer with severe peritoneal dissemination by staging laparoscopy, or with metastasis to the transverse colon. We selected combined chemotherapy with both paclitaxel and S-1. Paclitaxel at 60 mg/m(2) or 60 mg/body was administered intraperitoneally on days 1 and 8 and S-1, at 80-120 mg/body, was administered orally for 14 days followed by 7 days' rest, as one course. After five courses of this therapy, the primary gastric tumors were evaluated by conventional examinations, and second-look laparoscopy was performed to assess the efficacy of the treatment against the peritoneal metastases.

RESULTS

After five courses, primary tumor reductions were confirmed, and no cancer cells were detected on pathocytological investigation during second-look laparoscopy in any of the patients. Three patients underwent total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection and one underwent left upper abdominal evisceration. Final histological staging showed two stage 3 and two stage 4 patients. The intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel and the oral administration of S-1 were well tolerated. Three patients died, at 8, 15, and 29 months, respectively, after the initial treatment, and one has been alive for 54 months without recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This chemotherapy can be used in the treatment of patients with peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer.

Feasibility study of postoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermochemotherapy by radiofrequency capacitive heating system for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding

BACKGROUND

Gastric carcinoma patients with peritoneal dissemination have an extremely poor prognosis. Attempting to improve regional control and decrease the risk of complications related to hyperthermic chemotherapy, we applied a new treatment modality using a combination of gastrectomy with postoperative intraperitoneal hyperthermo-chemotherapy (PIHC) using Thermotron RF-8. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of PIHC in advanced gastric carcinoma patients with peritoneal seeding.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2002 and April 2006, 20 gastric carcinoma patients with peritoneal dissemination were allocated to two groups in the patient's selection. The PIHC group (10 patients) received a 60-min PIHC with a cisplatin dose of 80 mg/m2 two weeks after surgery, and the control group (10 patients) received surgery alone. Thermotron RF-8 is a heating device that can raise temperatures in both superficial and deep-seated tumours using 8 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic waves as a source of heat.

RESULTS

No patients in either group had life-threatening complications. The most frequent nonhaematologic toxicity (grade 3) was nausea. The one-, two-, and three-year cumulative survival rates for the PIHC group were 60%, 48%, and 36%, respectively, whereas those for the control group were 40%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. The survival rates for the PIHC group were significantly higher than those for the control group.

CONCLUSION

Although this study was conducted non-randomly with a small number of patients, the PIHC group had a higher survival rate and better prognosis compared with the control group.

Palliative management of gastric cancer

Advanced gastric cancer and its palliative treatment have a long and interesting history. Today, gastric adenocarcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Unfortunately, many cases are not diagnosed until late stages of disease, which underscores the importance of the palliative treatment of gastric cancer. Palliative care is best defined as the active total care of patients whose disease is not responsive to curative treatment. Although endoscopy is the most useful method for securing the diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma, computed tomography may be useful to assess local and distant disease. The main indication for the institution of palliative care is the presence of advanced gastric cancer for which curative treatment is deemed inappropriate. The primary goal of palliative therapy of gastric cancer patients is to improve quality, not necessarily length, of life. Four main modalities of palliative therapy for advanced gastric cancer are discussed: resection, bypass, stenting, and chemotherapy. The choice of modality depends on a variety of factors, including individual patient prognosis and goals, and should be made on case-by-case basis. Future directions include the discovery and development of serum or stool tumor markers aimed at prevention, improving prognostication and stratification, and increasing awareness and education.

Recent advances in the treatment of peritoneal dissemination of gastrointestinal cancers by nucleoside antimetabolites

Peritoneal dissemination is the most common cause of metastasis from malignancies in the abdominal cavity. There are no standard treatments for peritoneal dissemination and the results are poor. The reasons for this are as follows: (1) no effective chemotherapeutic agents have been identified or developed; (2) surgical cytoreduction has little effect on survival improvement; and (3) the molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination have not been clarified and no therapy against the target molecules has been developed. However, studies on the molecular mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination have elucidated some of the target molecules and the development of new multimodal therapies has also improved survival. Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy and neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy have been newly developed, and a novel surgical therapy named peritonectomy has been proposed to perform complete cytoreduction of peritoneal dissemination. At present, these approaches appear to be effective therapeutic modalities for peritoneal dissemination. However, TS-1 and capecitabine have shown worthwhile results in recent clinical trials for patients with advanced gastric cancer. We recently found that newly developed antitumor cytosine nucleoside analogs show a survival advantage in peritoneal dissemination models using human cancer cells. These non-fluoropyrimidine nucleosides may potentially help to improve the poor prognosis observed in patients with advanced cancers involving peritoneal dissemination.