EVAR of aortoiliac aneurysms with branched stent-grafts

Endovascular aneurysm repair with preservation of the internal iliac artery using the iliac branch graft device

OBJECTIVES

Aortoiliac aneurysms comprise up to 43% of the specialist endovascular caseload. In such cases endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires distal extension of the aortoiliac endograft beyond the ostium of the internal iliac artery (IIA) and into the external iliac artery, conventionally necessitating the embolisation of one or both IIA. This has been associated with a wide range of complications, and the use of an Iliac Branch-graft Device (IBD) offers an appealing endovascular solution.

DESIGN

Medline, trial registries, conference proceedings and article reference lists were searched to identify case series reporting IBD use. Data were extracted for review.

RESULTS

Nine series have reported the use of IBD in a total of 196 patients. Technical success was 85-100%. Median operating times were 101-290min and median contrast dose was 58-208g, with no aneurysm-related mortality. Claudication developed in 12/24 patients after IBD occlusion. One type I endoleak and two type III endoleaks occurred and were managed endovascularly. Re-occlusion occurred in 24/196 patients.

CONCLUSION

IBD was performed with high technical success rates and encouraging mid-term patency. Formalised risk stratification and morphological data are required to identify the group of patients who will benefit most. Cost-effectiveness appraisals are needed for this technique.

Endovascular treatment of iliac aneurysm: Concurrent comparison of side branch endograft versus hypogastric exclusion

OBJECTIVE

To analyze early and mid-term outcome of endovascular treatment in patients with iliac aneurysms, comparing the results of hypogastric revascularization by branch endografting with those of hypogastric occlusion.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with iliac aneurysms receiving side branch endograft (Group I) were compared with those receiving endograft with hypogastric exclusion (Group II) during the interval from January 2000 to May 2008. Procedural details and outcomes were prospectively collected and were analyzed at one year to avoid mismatch in follow-up length.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients (mean age, 75.8 years, 95% males) were treated: 32 in Group I and 42 in Group II. No differences in baseline risk factors and aneurysm diameter (40.2 +/- 7.9 mm in Group I vs. 38.4 +/- 10.8 in Group II) were found. Concurrent treatment of aortic aneurysm was performed in 25/32 (78%) of Group I and 36/42 (86%) of Group II. Fluoro time was 48 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 31-57) in Group I vs. 31 minutes (IQR 23-38) in Group II (P = .04). The amount of contrast was similar in both Groups: 184 ml (IQR 155-210) in Group I vs. 183 ml (IQR 155-200) in Group II. No intestinal ischemia or deaths occurred. There were no significant differences in failures of hypogastric side branch deployment (2/32) compared with hypogastric coiling (3/42). Limb occlusions all occurring in the external iliac artery side were 2/32 in Group I vs. 3/42 in Group II. Reintervention rates were similar (5/32 vs. 4/42) at one year. Shrinkage of 5 mm or more was detected in 7/23 (30%) of Group I and in 13/37 (34%) of Group II. Iliac endoleak was present in eight patients (19%) in Group II and in one patient in Group I (4%) (P = .1). Similarly, buttock claudication or impotence were more frequent after hypogastric exclusion, recorded in eight patients in Group II and in one patient in Group I (P = .1).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of iliac aneurysm with hypogastric revascularization through side branched endografts is feasible and safe in the mid-term. When compared with hypogastric embolization, this option leads to similar technical success and reintervention rates. Endoleak and buttock claudication occur frequently in patients with iliac aneurysm treated with hypogastric exclusion, while are uncommon in those with hypogastric revascularization. Side branch endografting for iliac aneurysm may be considered a primary choice in younger, active patients with suitable anatomy, but larger studies and longer postoperative observation periods are needed.