Treatment of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia: a comparison of endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy

Evaluation and treatment of superficial esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is the fastest increasing cancer in the USA, and an increasing number of patients are identified with early-stage disease. The evaluation and treatment of these superficial cancers differs from local and regionally advanced lesions.

METHODS

This paper is a review of the current methods to diagnose, stage, and treat superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Intramucosal adenocarcinoma can be effectively treated with endoscopic resection techniques and with less morbid surgical options including a vagal-sparing esophagectomy. However, submucosal lesions are associated with a significant risk for lymph node metastases and are best treated with esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy.

DISCUSSION

There has been a major shift in the treatment for Barrett's high-grade dysplasia and superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma in the past 10 years. New therapies minimize the morbidity and mortality of traditional forms of esophagectomy and in some cases allow esophageal preservation. Individualization of therapy will allow maximization of successful outcome and quality of life with minimization of complications and recurrence of Barrett's or cancer.

Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic therapy is emerging as an alternative to surgical therapy in patients with mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) given the low likelihood of lymph node metastases. Long-term outcomes of patients treated endoscopically and surgically for mucosal EAC are unknown. We compared long-term outcomes of patients with mucosal EAC treated endoscopically and surgically.

METHODS

Patients treated for mucosal EAC between 1998 and 2007 were included. Patients were divided into an endoscopically treated group (ENDO group) and a surgically treated group (SURG group). Vital status information was queried using an institutionally approved internet research and location service. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were included, of whom 132 (74%) were in the ENDO group and 46 (26%) were in the SURG group. The mean follow-up period was 64 months (standard error of the mean, 4.8 mo) in the SURG group and 43 months (standard error of the mean, 2.8 mo) in the ENDO group. Cumulative mortality in the ENDO group (17%) was comparable with the SURG group (20%) (P = .75). Overall survival also was comparable using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment modality was not a significant predictor of survival on multivariable analysis. Recurrent carcinoma was detected in 12% of patients in the ENDO group, all successfully re-treated without impact on overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival in patients with mucosal EAC when treated endoscopically appears to be comparable with that of patients treated surgically. Recurrent carcinoma occurs in a limited proportion of patients, but can be managed endoscopically.

Treatment of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing in the USA, now accounting for at least 4% of US cancer-related deaths. Barrett's esophagus is the main risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The annual incidence of development of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus is approximately 0.5% per year, representing at least a 30-40-fold increase in risk from the general population. High-grade dysplasia is known to be the most important risk factor for progression to adenocarcinoma. Traditionally, esophagectomy has been the standard treatment for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. This practice is supported by studies revealing unexpected adenocarcinoma in 29-50% of esophageal resection specimens for high-grade dysplasia. In addition, esophagectomy employed prior to tumor invasion of the muscularis mucosa results in 5-year survival rates in excess of 80%. Although esophagectomy can result in improved survival rates for early-stage cancer, it is accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, more accurate methods of surveillance and advances in endoscopic therapies have allowed scientists and clinicians to develop treatment strategies with lower morbidity for high-grade dysplasia. Early data suggests that carefully selected patients with high-grade dysplasia can be managed safely with endoscopic therapy, with outcomes comparable to surgery, but with less morbidity. This is an especially attractive approach for patients that either cannot tolerate or decline surgical esophagectomy. For patients that are surgical candidates, high-volume centers have demonstrated improved morbidity and mortality rates for esophagectomy. The addition of laparoscopic esophagectomy adds a less invasive surgical resection to the treatment armanentarium. Esophagectomy will remain the gold-standard treatment of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia until clinical research validates the role of endoscopic therapies. Current treatment strategies for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia will be reviewed.

The Seattle protocol does not more reliably predict the detection of cancer at the time of esophagectomy than a less intensive surveillance protocol

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The optimal management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus remains controversial. A biopsy protocol consisting of 4 quadrant jumbo biopsies (every 1 cm) with biopsies of mucosal abnormalities (the Seattle protocol) is considered to be the optimal method for detecting early cancers in patients with high-grade dysplasia, although it has never been validated. This study aimed to determine the frequency of unsuspected carcinoma at esophagectomy in Barrett's esophagus patients with high-grade dysplasia who underwent the Seattle protocol and to compare the findings with those of a less rigorous biopsy protocol.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with high-grade dysplasia underwent esophagectomy. None had obvious mass lesions at preoperative endoscopy. Patients were divided into group 1 (preoperative surveillance biopsies according to Seattle protocol) and group 2 (4 quadrant biopsies every 2 cm). Preoperative and postoperative diagnoses were confirmed by 2 expert gastrointestinal pathologists.

RESULTS

Unsuspected intramucosal cancer was found in 8 of 20 (40%) patients in group 1 versus 4 of 13 (30%) in group 2 (P = .6). Preoperative mucosal nodularity was observed in 4 of 8 (50%) postoperative intramucosal cancers from group 1 versus 3 of 4 (75%) from group 2. Multifocal high-grade dysplasia was seen preoperatively in 7 of 8 (87.5%) postoperative intramucosal cancers in group 1 versus 2 of 4 (50%) in group 2. No patient had submucosal cancer or lymph node metastases at surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Intense preoperative biopsy sampling by the Seattle protocol does not more reliably predict the detection of cancer at the time of esophagectomy than a less intensive surveillance protocol. This calls into question the concept that extensive sampling with the Seattle protocol consistently detects early cancers arising in Barrett's esophagus patients with high-grade dysplasia.

Low prevalence of submucosal invasive carcinoma at esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

The rate of occult adenocarcinoma at esophagectomy in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD) has been reported to be approximately 40%. Recently, it has been suggested that this risk may be overestimated.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the rate of submucosal invasive adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing esophagectomy for BE after biopsy diagnosis of HGD or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC). A secondary aim was to identify clinical risk factors for submucosal invasive adenocarcinoma in these patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients with preoperative BE with HGD or IMC treated with esophagectomy over a 20 year period.

INTERVENTIONS

Esophagectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Submucosal invasive adenocarcinoma at esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (41 with preoperative HGD, 19 with preoperative IMC). The overall rate of submucosal invasive carcinoma was 6.7% (95% CI, 1.8%-16.2%) (n = 4), with a 5% rate of submucosal invasion in patients with preoperative HGD and 11% for patients with preoperative IMC. All 4 patients with submucosal invasion at esophagectomy had either nodular or ulcerated mucosa on preoperative endoscopy. The 1-year and 5-year all-cause risks of death for the entire cohort were 1.9% and 10.9%, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of submucosal invasive adenocarcinoma at esophagectomy in BE patients with HGD or IMC on biopsy is much lower than 40%. After adequate sampling and staging, patients with BE with HGD and IMC, especially those without endoscopically visible lesions, can potentially be treated by nonsurgical (local) therapies.

Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, which has an increased incidence rate over the last few decades. Its importance stems from the poor five-year survival of esophageal adenocarcinoma and current data that suggest a survival benefit when surveillance programs are implemented. In this review, we will cover the pathophysiology and natural history of BE and the different endoscopic findings. The prevalence of BE in different geographic areas and the incidence of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in this patient population is reviewed. Recent recommendation for screening and surveillance of BE has been covered in this review as well as the efficacy of nonconventional imaging modalities and endoscopic ablation therapies.