A morphologic analysis of sessile serrated polyps observed during routine colonoscopy (with video)

High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas in contemporary outpatient colonoscopy practice

BACKGROUND

Sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) are the polyp precursor of 15-20% of colorectal carcinomas. There is debate about their prevalence and increasing discussion about the need for a serrated polyp detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy.

AIMS

To assess the prevalence of SSA at an outpatient gastroenterology service.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of an unselected consecutive series of patients who had an outpatient colonoscopy between April 2013 and May 2014. The colonoscopy reports were reviewed to identify age, gender, indication for procedure, completion, withdrawal time, adequacy of bowel preparation, number, size and location of polyps. The pathology of all polyps was centrally reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist.

RESULTS

A total of 707 patients underwent colonoscopy within the study period. The mean age of the cohort was 58 years, and 50.6% were female. Polyp(s) were identified in 66.5% of patients. The SSA detection rate was 20.1%, and the adenoma detection rate was 48.0%. SSA detection was associated with longer withdrawal times. Conventional adenoma detection was associated with older age, male gender, longer withdrawal time and a positive faecal occult blood test result.

CONCLUSION

SSA are highly prevalent in an unselected series of patients attending a gastroenterology outpatient department. Identifying and removing these polyps may help prevent interval colorectal carcinoma. This result may serve as a benchmark for a high-quality colonoscopy service.

Flat Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Relevance, Appearance, and Optimizing Interpretation

Serrated polyps are a recently recognized family of colonic polyps with subgroups that harbor future malignant potential. In the past, the significance of these lesions to the colorectal cancer carcinogenesis pathway was not recognized nor well understood. It is now known that serrated polyps account for approximately one-fourth of all sporadic colorectal cancers. The sessile serrated polyp (SSP) (also known as a sessile serrated adenoma [SSA]) is the main lesion of interest given its prevalence and subtle presentation. These lesions are often flat-only minimally raised from the colonic surface-and occur in the right colon. These lesions have been a likely common cause of screening failure at colonoscopy, although detection has improved with improved recognition over time. Although detection is difficult with image-based screening, serrated lesions can be detected at CT colonography. The prevalence in CT colonography screening populations mirrors the rates at colonoscopy for similar size categories. CT colonography allows identification of SSPs despite their minimally raised profile owing to the phenomenon of lesional contrast material coating. This contrast material coat aids in lesion detection by highlighting the subtle morphologic changes as well as increasing confidence that a true lesion exists despite a flat morphology. It is important to optimize contrast material coating with specific bowel preparations and other technical parameters. Radiologists should be aware of these technical and interpretation issues. Armed with this knowledge, radiologists should expect excellent results in detection of these subtle but important lesions. ^©RSNA, 2017.

Serrated polyps - a concealed but prevalent precursor of colorectal cancer

Serrated polyps have long been considered to lack malignant potential but accumulating data suggest that these lesions may cause up to one-third of all sporadic colorectal cancer. Serrated polyps are classified into three subtypes, including sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), and hyperplastic polyps (HPs). SSA/P and TSA harbour malignant potential but TSA represents only 1-2%, wheras SSA/P constitute up to 20% of all serrated lesions. HPs are most common (80%) of all serrated polyps but are considered to have a low potential of developing colorectal cancer. Due to their subtle appearence, detection and removal of serrated polyps pose a major challenge to endoscopists. Considering that precancerous serrated polyps are predominately located in the right colon could explain why interval cancers most frequently appear in the proximal colon and why colonoscopy is less protective against colon cancer in the proximal compared to the distal colon. Despite the significant impact on colorectal cancer incidence, the aetiology, incidence, prevalence, and natural history of serrated polyps is incompletely known. To effectively detect, remove, and follow-up serrated polyps, endoscopists and pathologists should be well-informed about serrated polyps. This review highlights colorectal serrated polyps in terms of biology, types, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up.

Colonoscopic surveillance: quality, guidelines and effectiveness

Colonoscopic surveillance in patients with a personal or family history of colorectal carcinoma or colonic polyps represents a significant workload for endoscopy services. Effective colonoscopic surveillance relies on quality endoscopic examination and appropriate surveillance interval. This review will discuss quality in colonoscopy and review guidelines for surveillance.

Polyp detection at colonoscopy: Endoscopist and technical factors

The adenoma detection rate (ADR) has emerged as the most important quality measure in colonoscopy, as it predicts the risk of interval cancer after colonoscopy. Measuring and improving ADR is the central focus of the current quality movement in colonoscopy. High ADRs can be achieved by a colonoscopist with a thorough understanding of the wide range of endoscopic appearances of precancerous lesions in the colorectum, effective bowel preparation, and meticulous technique using high definition colonoscopes. The knowledgeable and effective examiner needs no adjunctive devices or techniques to achieve master level ADRs. However, measurement reveals that many colonoscopists have ADRs that are below recommended minimum thresholds or below master levels. These colonoscopists, and even master level performers, can choose from a variety of adjunctive tools to improve ADR. This review describes these tools according to whether they are non-device methods (e.g. double right colon examination, patient position change, water exchange), mucosal exposure devices (wide angle colonoscopy, fold flattening devices), and lesion highlighting techniques (e.g. chromoendoscopy, electronic chromoendoscopy).

British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum

Serrated polyps have been recognised in the last decade as important premalignant lesions accounting for between 15% and 30% of colorectal cancers. There is therefore a clinical need for guidance on how to manage these lesions; however, the evidence base is limited. A working group was commission by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Endoscopy section to review the available evidence and develop a position statement to provide clinical guidance until the evidence becomes available to support a formal guideline. The scope of the position statement was wide-ranging and included: evidence that serrated lesions have premalignant potential; detection and resection of serrated lesions; surveillance strategies after detection of serrated lesions; special situations-serrated polyposis syndrome (including surgery) and serrated lesions in colitis; education, audit and benchmarks and research questions. Statements on these issues were proposed where the evidence was deemed sufficient, and re-evaluated modified via a Delphi process until >80% agreement was reached. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool was used to assess the strength of evidence and strength of recommendation for finalised statements. Key recommendation: we suggest that until further evidence on the efficacy or otherwise of surveillance are published, patients with sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) that appear associated with a higher risk of future neoplasia or colorectal cancer (SSLs ≥10 mm or serrated lesions harbouring dysplasia including traditional serrated adenomas) should be offered a one-off colonoscopic surveillance examination at 3 years (weak recommendation, low quality evidence, 90% agreement).

Serrated lesions and serrated polyposis syndrome

The serrated pathway has been shown to be an alternative colorectal carcinogenetic route potentially accounting for up to one third of all CRCs. Serrated lesions, particularly SSPs, have been a focus of research during the past few years. They have well-established histological and molecular characteristics that account for their potential carcinogenetic risk through the accumulation BRAF, KRAS and methylator profile (CpG) mutations. Their endoscopic identification and resection represent a challenge because of their specific characteristics, and the need for an adequate specimen for histological diagnosis. Knowledge of these lesions is key, as is the adoption of established criteria for their endoscopic description and histological diagnosis. SPS is the maximum expression of involvement by serrated lesions, is associated with increased risk for CRC, and requires attentive endoscopic follow-up, as well as family screening. While the exact etiopathogenic mechanism remains unknown, current research will likely provide us with appropriate answers in the not too distant future.

Detection of Sessile Serrated Adenomas in the Proximal Colon Using Wide-Field Fluorescence Endoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Many cancers in the proximal colon develop via from sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs), which have flat, subtle features that are difficult to detect with conventional white-light colonoscopy. Many SSA cells have the V600E mutation in BRAF. We investigated whether this feature could be used with imaging methods to detect SSAs in patients.

METHODS

We used phage display to identify a peptide that binds specifically to SSAs, using subtractive hybridization with HT29 colorectal cancer cells containing the V600E mutation in BRAF and Hs738.St/Int cells as a control. Binding of fluorescently labeled peptide to colorectal cancer cells was evaluated with confocal fluorescence microscopy. Rats received intra-colonic 0.0086 mg/kg, 0.026 mg/kg, or 0.86 mg/kg peptide or vehicle and morbidity, mortality, and injury were monitored twice daily to assess toxicity. In the clinical safety study, fluorescently labeled peptide was topically administered, using a spray catheter, to the proximal colon of 25 subjects undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies (3 subjects were given 2.25 μmol/L and 22 patients were given 76.4 μmol/L). We performed blood cell count, chemistry, liver function, and urine analyses approximately 24 hours after peptide administration. In the clinical imaging study, 38 subjects undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies, at high risk for colorectal cancer, or with a suspected unresected proximal colonic polyp, were first evaluated by white-light endoscopy to identify suspicious regions. The fluorescently labeled peptide (76.4 μmol/L) was administered topically to proximal colon, unbound peptide was washed away, and white-light, reflectance, and fluorescence videos were recorded digitally. Fluorescence intensities of SSAs were compared with those of normal colonic mucosa. Endoscopists resected identified lesions, which were analyzed histologically by gastrointestinal pathologists (reference standard). We also analyzed the ability of the peptide to identify SSAs vs adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and normal colonic mucosa in specimens obtained from the tissue bank at the University of Michigan.

RESULTS

We identified the peptide sequence KCCFPAQ and measured an apparent dissociation constant of K_d = 72 nM and an apparent association time constant of K = 0.174 min^-1 (5.76 minutes). During fluorescence imaging of patients during endoscopy, regions of SSA had 2.43-fold higher mean fluorescence intensity than that for normal colonic mucosa. Fluorescence labeling distinguished SSAs from normal colonic mucosa with 89% sensitivity and 92% specificity. The peptide had no observed toxic effects in animals or patients. In the analysis of ex vivo specimens, peptide bound to SSAs had significantly higher mean fluorescence intensity than to hyperplastic polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified a fluorescently labeled peptide that has no observed toxic effects in animals or humans and can be used for wide-field imaging of lesions in the proximal colon. It distinguishes SSAs from normal colonic mucosa with 89% sensitivity and 92% specificity. This targeted imaging method might be used in early detection of premalignant serrated lesions during routine colonoscopies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02156557.

A Prospective Study of Smoking and Risk of Synchronous Colorectal Cancers

OBJECTIVES

Cigarette smoking has been linked to somatic genetic and epigenetic aberrations, including CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-high, microsatellite instability (MSI)-high and BRAF mutation. These molecular features have been associated with synchronous primary colorectal cancers (CRCs). Thus, we examined the hypothesis that smoking might be associated with the risk of synchronous CRCs.

METHODS

Within the Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Nurses' Health Study, we examined the relationship of smoking and incidence of CRC according to tumor synchronicity, using duplication-method Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

We confirmed 1,981 solitary CRC and 45 synchronous CRC cases during follow-up of 134,305 individuals. CRC risk associated with smoking differed significantly by tumor synchronicity status (P_{heterogeneity}<0.001). When comparing current smokers with never smokers, multivariable hazard ratios (HR) were 5.27 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.08-13.40) for synchronous CRCs and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.83-1.14) for solitary CRC. Similarly, differential associations were observed when examining cumulative pack-years smoked (P_{heterogeneity}=0.006). Smoking cessation for ≥10 years relative to current smoking might reduce the risk of synchronous CRCs (multivariable HR=0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.95), but not solitary CRC (multivariable HR=1.10; 95% CI, 0.94-1.29; P_{heterogeneity}=0.001). Comparing current and former smokers with never smokers, multivariable HRs for synchronous CRCs were significantly higher than those of solitary CRC positive for either CIMP-high, MSI-high, or BRAF mutation (P_{heterogeneity}=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking is associated with an elevated risk of synchronous CRCs. Our data support a model where smoking contributes to an etiologic field effect that favors these somatic molecular alterations and the development of multiple primary tumors.

Distinct endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with and without dysplasia/carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) is a colorectal polyp that has malignant potential. However, the dysplastic components within an SSA/P can be difficult to detect. This study aimed to clarify the endoscopic characteristics of SSA/P with advanced histology.

METHODS

We examined 462 endoscopically or surgically resected lesions that were pathologically diagnosed as SSA/P, including 414 without and 41 with cytologic dysplasia, and 7 with invasive carcinoma. We retrospectively studied the clinicopathologic and endoscopic characteristics and performed pit pattern analysis.

RESULTS

A stepwise increase in the size of the SSA/P series was identified along with their dysplastic progression, although 19 of 48 (39.6%) SSA/Ps with dysplasia/carcinoma were ≤10 mm in size. Most lesions were covered with a mucus cap. Macroscopically, (semi)pedunculated morphology, double elevation, central depression, and reddishness were found more frequently in SSA/P with cytologic dysplasia and invasive carcinoma ([semi]pedunculated morphology, 17.1%/28.6%; double elevation, 63.4%/57.1%; central depression, 9.8%/28.6%; reddishness, 39.0%/85.7%) than in those without dysplasia (4.6%, 4.6%, 3.9%, and 3.4%, respectively). Furthermore, the presence of at least 1 of these 4 markers had high sensitivity (91.7%) for identifying the dysplasia/carcinoma within a SSA/P, with a specificity of 85.3%. In the pit pattern analysis, all SSA/Ps without dysplasia exhibited type II pit pattern only, whereas 94.4% of SSA/Ps with dysplasia/carcinoma showed type II in addition to type III_L, IV, V_I, or V_N pit patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

In an SSA/P series, endoscopic characteristics, including (semi)pedunculated morphology, double elevation, central depression, and reddishness, in addition to the use of magnifying endoscopy, may be useful to accurately diagnose advanced histology within an SSA/P.

Clinicopathological characteristics of serrated polyps as precursors to colorectal cancer: Current status and management

Serrated polyps have long been thought to lack malignant potential in the human colorectum. However, identification of the serrated pathway to colorectal cancer based on molecular biology has improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of colorectal cancers. Accordingly, serrated polyps such as traditional serrated adenoma and sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P) are now considered to be precursor lesions of the serrated pathway. Recently, serrated polyps were classified into three subtypes, consisting of hyperplastic polyp, SSA/P, and traditional serrated adenoma, according to the World Health Organization classification. It has been suggested that SSA/P in the proximal colon are a precursor lesion of pathogenesis of colorectal cancer and are characterized by BRAF mutation and a CpG island methylator phenotype with or without microsatellite instability. However, SSA/P is more challenging to detect by colonoscopy and is likely to account for some interval cancers, particularly in the proximal colon because it presents flat or sessile, isochroous appearance, and occasionally has a mucous cap. Furthermore, the possibility has been raised that pathologists misclassify SSA/P as hyperplastic polyp. It is important for gastroenterologists to recognize the endoscopic features of serrated polyps to facilitate their detection and removal and also to establish postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines. In this review, we discuss the recent classification of serrated polyps; the molecular characteristics of the serrated pathway; appropriate diagnostic methods using endoscopy, including a new image-enhanced endoscopic technique; and management of these lesions.

[Submucosal chromoendoscopy. A technique that highlights epithelia and differentiates histological components, and renders colon polypectomy easier and safer]

Submucosal chromoendoscopy involves the injection of a solution containing a vital stain, usually indigo carmine, into the intestinal wall submucosal layer. This allows to: Better delimit and characterize the various epithelia present (colonic mucosa, adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, serrated polyp, small bowel mucosa); expose and delimit lesion implantation areas; cooperate in the lifting of resectable lesions; ensure section across the submucosal plane; identify intestinal wall structures; render complex polypectomy feasible; and facilitate the identification of perforations.The present paper offers information on the endoscopic technique for submucosal injection, solution preparation and concentration, and on the potential benefits it may provide for polypectomy or endocopic mucosal resection whether en block or piecemeal. This endoscopic technique simultaneously combines a diagnostic and a therapeutic aspect, since lesion lifting in association with better delimited contours may improve not only accuracy but also endoscopic resection safety and feasibility.

External Validation of the Endoscopic Features of Sessile Serrated Adenomas in Expert and Trainee Colonoscopists

Background/Aims

It is unclear whether the endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) would be useful to trainee colonoscopists to predict SSA. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify features that expert and trainee colonoscopists can use to independently and reliably predict SSA by using high-resolution white-light endoscopy.

Methods

Endoscopic images of 81 polyps (39 SSAs, 22 hyperplastic polyps, and 20 tubular adenomas) from 43 patients were retrospectively evaluated by 10 colonoscopists (four experts and six trainees). Eight endoscopic features of SSAs were assessed for each polyp.

Results

According to multivariable analysis, a mucous cap (odds ratio [OR], 10.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.72 to 19.07), indistinctive borders (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.74 to 7.16), dark spots (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.89 to 7.00), and cloud-like surface (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.668) were independent predictors of SSAs. Among these, a mucous cap, indistinctive borders, and cloud-like surface showed moderate interobserver agreement (mean κ >0.40) among experts and trainees. When ≥1 of the three predictors was observed, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing SSAs were 79.0% and 81.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

Colonoscopy trainees and experts can use several specific endoscopic features to independently and reliably predict SSAs.

Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps

OBJECTIVE

Accurate endoscopic differentiation would enable to resect and discard small and diminutive colonic lesions, thereby increasing cost-efficiency. Current classification systems based on narrow band imaging (NBI), however, do not include neoplastic sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps). We aimed to develop and validate a new classification system for endoscopic differentiation of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and SSA/Ps <10 mm.

DESIGN

We developed the Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis (WASP) classification, combining the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic classification and criteria for differentiation of SSA/Ps in a stepwise approach. Ten consultant gastroenterologists predicted polyp histology, including levels of confidence, based on the endoscopic aspect of 45 polyps, before and after participation in training in the WASP classification. After 6 months, the same endoscopists predicted polyp histology of a new set of 50 polyps, with a ratio of lesions comparable to daily practice.

RESULTS

The accuracy of optical diagnosis was 0.63 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.71) at baseline, which improved to 0.79 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.86, p<0.001) after training. For polyps diagnosed with high confidence the accuracy was 0.73 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.82), which improved to 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95, p<0.01). The accuracy of optical diagnosis after 6 months was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.80), increasing to 0.84 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88) considering high confidence diagnosis. The combined negative predictive value with high confidence of diminutive neoplastic lesions (adenomas and SSA/Ps together) was 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated the first integrative classification method for endoscopic differentiation of small and diminutive adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and SSA/Ps. In a still image evaluation setting, introduction of the WASP classification significantly improved the accuracy of optical diagnosis overall as well as SSA/P in particular, which proved to be sustainable after 6 months.

Serrated colorectal cancer: Molecular classification, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy

Molecular advances support the existence of an alternative pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis that is based on the hypermethylation of specific DNA regions that silences tumor suppressor genes. This alternative pathway has been called the serrated pathway due to the serrated appearance of tumors in histological analysis. New classifications for colorectal cancer (CRC) were proposed recently based on genetic profiles that show four types of molecular alterations: BRAF gene mutations, KRAS gene mutations, microsatellite instability, and hypermethylation of CpG islands. This review summarizes what is known about the serrated pathway of CRC, including CRC molecular and clinical features, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy.

Pathology of premalignant colorectal neoplasia

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous oncological disease that develops through several molecular pathways. Each pathway is associated with specific neoplastic precursor lesions. Classification of colorectal polyps and the molecular features of associated colorectal cancers have undergone significant changes. An understanding of colorectal carcinogenesis and the molecular features of colorectal carcinomas is now regarded as necessary for personalized treatment and management of patients with colon cancer, and even for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. In the present review, we describe the pathological and molecular features of epithelial precursor lesions involved in the early phases of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Can Be Safely and Effectively Removed by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

As many as 50% of large sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSPs) are removed incompletely, which is significant because SSPs have been implicated in the development of interval cancers. It is unclear if endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an optimal method for removal of SSPs. We assessed the efficacy and safety of removal of SSPs 10 mm and larger using a standardized inject-and-cut EMR technique.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of colonoscopy data, collected over 7 years (2007-2013) at 2 centers, from 199 patients with proximal colon SSPs 10 mm and larger (251 polyps) removed by EMR by 4 endoscopists. The primary outcome measure was local recurrence. The secondary outcome measure was safety.

RESULTS

At the index colonoscopy, patients had a median of 1 serrated lesion (range, 1-12) and 1 nonserrated neoplastic lesion (range, 0-15). The mean SSP size was 15.9 ± 5.3 mm; most were superficially elevated (84.5%) and located in the ascending colon (51%), and 3 SSPs (1.2%) had dysplasia. Surveillance colonoscopies were performed on 138 patients (69.3%) over a mean follow-up period of 25.5 ± 17.4 months. Of these patients, 5 had local recurrences (3.6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.5%-6.7%), detected after 17.8 ± 15.4 months, with a median size of 4 mm. No patients developed postprocedural bleeding, perforation, or advanced colon cancer, or had a death related to the index colorectal lesion during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Inject-and-cut EMR is a safe and effective technique for the resection of SSPs. Less than 5% of patients have a local recurrence, which is usually small and can be treated endoscopically.

Diagnosis of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps using endocytoscopy (with videos)

Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P) are considered to be precursors of colorectal cancers. They therefore need to be distinguished from hyperplastic polyps, and should be treated similarly to adenomas. Various endoscopic classifications for discriminating SSA/P have recently been proposed and validated, including the 'Type II-O' pit pattern in magnifying chromoendoscopy and the 'varicose microvascular vessel' in narrow-band imaging. However, there is currently no diagnostic consensus on the endoscopic appearance of SSA/P. Endocytoscopy (EC) is an emerging modality with diagnostic potential for SSA/P. EC is a type of a contact light microscopy, which allows in vivo visualization of cells and nuclei facilitating precise, real-time pathological prediction. SSA/P show oval gland lumens with small round nuclei in EC, indirectly reflecting the pathological features. EC has shown a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 97.8% for the diagnosis of SSA/P. EC is also a promising tool for the diagnosis of SSA/P with cytological dysplasia because of its ability to detect morphological changes in nuclei, which is the most important factor determining the presence of dysplasia in the lesion. However, clinical data validating the usefulness of EC are lacking, and further studies are required.

CT-Colonography vs. Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps

OBJECTIVES

Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are suggested to be the precursors of 15-30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). Therefore, CRC screening modalities should also be designed to detect high-risk SSPs. We compared computed tomography colonography (CTC) with colonoscopy-based screening for the detection of high-risk SSPs in average-risk individuals.

METHODS

Data from a randomized controlled trial that compared CTC with colonoscopy for population screening were used for the analysis. Individuals diagnosed at CTC with a lesion ≥10 mm in size were referred for colonoscopy. Individuals with only 6-9 mm lesions were offered surveillance CTC. This surveillance CTC was followed by a colonoscopy when a lesion ≥6 mm was detected. Yield of both was accumulated to mimic current American College of Radiology CTC referral strategy (referral of individuals with any lesion ≥6 mm). Per participant detection of ≥1 high-risk (dysplastic and/or ≥10 mm) SSP was compared with colonoscopy using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 8,844 individuals were invited to participate (in 2:1 allocation), of which 1,276 colonoscopy and 982 CTC invitees participated in the study. In the colonoscopy arm, 4.3% of individuals were diagnosed with ≥1 high-risk SSP, compared with 0.8% in the CTC arm (odds ratio (OR) 5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-11.6; P<0.001). In total, 3.1% of individuals in the colonoscopy arm were diagnosed with high-risk SSPs as most advanced lesion, compared with 0.4% in the CTC arm (OR 7.7; 95% CI 2.7-21.6; P<0.001). The current CTC strategy showed a marked lower detection for especially flat high-risk SSPs (17 vs. 0), high-risk SSP located in the proximal colon (32 vs. 1), and SSPs with dysplasia (30 vs. 1).

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized controlled setting, the detection rate of high-risk SSPs was significantly higher with colonoscopy than CTC. These results might have implications for CTC as a CRC modality for opportunistic screening in average-risk adults.

Clinical and endoscopic predictors of cytological dysplasia or cancer in a prospective multicentre study of large sessile serrated adenomas/polyps

OBJECTIVE

The serrated neoplasia pathway accounts for up to 30% of all sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs). Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) with cytological dysplasia (SSA/P-D) are a high-risk serrated CRC precursor with little existing data. We aimed to describe the clinical and endoscopic predictors of SSA/P-D and high grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer.

DESIGN

Prospective multicentre data of SSA/Ps ≥20 mm referred for treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection (September 2008-July 2013) were analysed. Imaging and lesion assessment was standardised. Histological findings were correlated with clinical and endoscopic findings.

RESULTS

268 SSA/Ps were found in 207/1546 patients (13.4%). SSA/P-D comprised 32.4% of SSA/Ps ≥20 mm. Cancer occurred in 3.9%. On multivariable analysis, SSA/P-D was associated with increasing age (OR=1.69 per decade; 95% CI (1.19 to 2.40), p0.004) and increasing lesion size (OR=1.90 per 10 mm; 95% CI (1.30 to 2.78), p0.001), an 'adenomatous' pit pattern (Kudo III, IV or V) (OR=3.98; 95% CI (1.94 to 8.15), p<0.001) and any 0-Is component within a SSA/P (OR=3.10; 95% CI (1.19 to 8.12) p0.021). Conventional type dysplasia was more likely to exhibit an adenomatous pit pattern than serrated dysplasia. HGD or cancer was present in 7.2% and on multivariable analysis, was associated with increasing age (OR=2.0 per decade; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.56) p0.017) and any Paris 0-Is component (OR=10.2; 95% CI 3.18 to 32.4, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Simple assessment tools allow endoscopists to predict SSA/P-D or HGD/cancer in SSA/Ps ≥20 mm. Correct prediction is limited by failure to recognise SSA/P-D which may mimic conventional adenoma. Understanding the concept of SSA/P-D and the pitfalls of SSA/P assessment may improve detection, recognition and resection and potentially reduce interval cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01368289.

Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum

Purpose To report the prevalence and characteristics of serrated polyps identified in a large, average-risk population undergoing screening computed tomographic (CT) colonography. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. The need for informed consent was waived. Nine thousand six hundred examinations from 8289 patients were enrolled in a single-institution CT colonography-based screening program (from 2004 to 2011) and were evaluated for the presence of nondiminutive serrated lesions and advanced adenomas. The prevalence and characteristics of these lesions were tabulated. Generalized estimating equation regressions of polyp characteristics that may contribute to visualization of serrated lesions were investigated, including polyp size, location, and morphologic appearance; histologic findings; and presence or absence of contrast material tagging. Results Nondiminutive serrated lesions (≥6 mm) were seen at CT colonography-based screening with a prevalence of 3.1% (254 of 8289 patients). Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) constituted 36.8% (137 of 372) and 4.3% (16 of 372) of serrated lesions, respectively; hyperplastic polyps (HPs) accounted for 58.9% (219 of 372 lesions). SSA and TSA tended to be large (mean size, 10.6 mm and 14.1 mm, respectively), with size categories and polyp subgroups significantly associated (P < .0001). SSA tended to be proximal in location (91.2%, 125 of 137 lesions) and flat in morphologic appearance (39.4%, 54 of 137 lesions) compared with TSA and HP. The presence of high-grade dysplasia in serrated lesions was uncommon when compared with advanced adenomas (one of 372 lesions vs 22 of 395 lesions, respectively; P < .0001). Multivariate analysis showed that contrast material tagging markedly improved serrated polyp detection with an odds ratio of 40.4 (95% confidence interval: 10.1, 161.4). Conclusion Serrated lesions are seen at CT colonography-based screening with a nondiminutive prevalence of 3.1%. These lesions tend to be large, flat, and proximal in location. Adherent contrast material coating on these polyps aids in their detection, despite an often flat morphologic appearance. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Confocal laser endomicroscopy features of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) are difficult to differentiate from non-neoplastic tissue on white-light endoscopy. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) provides subcellular imaging and real-time "optical biopsy". The aim of this study was to prospectively describe CLE features of SSA/Ps.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with SSA/Ps were prospectively evaluated with probe-based CLE imaging. CLE images and polyp histology were independently reviewed by three endoscopists and an expert gastrointestinal (GI) pathologist. Distinguishing CLE features of SSA/Ps were identified in conjunction with pathologic correlation.

RESULTS

In total, 260 CLE images were generated from nine SSA/Ps evaluated in seven patients. Four consensus CLE features of SSA/P were identified: (1) a mucus cap with a bright, cloud-like appearance; (2) thin, branching crypts; (3) increased number of goblet cells and microvesicular mucin-containing cells; and (4) architectural disarray, with dystrophic goblet cells and lack of regular circular crypts.

CONCLUSION

This is a novel description of characteristic CLE features of SSA/Ps. The four features we identified are easy to detect and may allow for CLE to serve as a diagnostic modality.

Recurrence rates after EMR of large sessile serrated polyps

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the recurrence rate after EMR of large (≥20 mm) sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the recurrence rate among SSA/Ps and conventional adenomas in patients referred to a specialty practice for EMR.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic hospital and a satellite surgery center.

PATIENTS

A total of 362 consecutive patients referred for resection of large (≥20 mm) polyps in the colorectum.

INTERVENTIONS

All EMRs were performed with a submucosal contrast agent. All subjects had a follow-up surveillance examination (inspection and biopsy of the EMR) at our center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Rates of residual polyp at follow-up examination.

RESULTS

Residual polyp was identified among 8.7% of SSA/Ps compared with 11.1% for conventional adenomas (P = .8).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design, procedures performed by a single experienced endoscopist, low number of serrated lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of recurrence after EMR of SSA/Ps is similar to the rate after EMR of conventional adenomas.

Prospective evaluation of the proportion of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps in endoscopically diagnosed colorectal polyps with hyperplastic features

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) are considered precursors of colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. However, it is still difficult to differentiate SSA/Ps from hyperplastic polyps endoscopically; therefore, the prevalence of SSA/Ps remains uncertain in clinical practice. This study aimed to clarify the proportion of SSA/Ps in endoscopically diagnosed colorectal polyps with hyperplastic features (E-HPs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 40 years undergoing colonoscopy for standard clinical indications at our center were prospectively enrolled between June 2013 and May 2014. During colonoscopy, 0.05 % indigo carmine dye was sprayed throughout the colorectum to highlight lesions. All detected lesions were diagnosed by high definition magnifying narrow-band imaging and were resected endoscopically or surgically, apart from rectosigmoid E-HPs ≤ 5 mm. The number of rectosigmoid E-HPs ≤ 5 mm was recorded, and some were resected for use as tissue samples.

RESULTS

A total of 343 patients (male: 42.9 %; mean age: 61.5 years) were included. Among 3838 E-HPs (distal: 96.4 %) detected in 294 patients, 792 were resected and analyzed. All of 21 SSA/Ps identified in 17 patients were included in E-HPs, and the overall proportion of SSA/Ps in E-HPs was 2.7 %. However, this proportion increased with the size of E-HPs (≤ 5 mm: 0.7 %; 6 - 9 mm: 29.0 %; ≥ 10 mm: 70 %) and was higher in the proximal colon than in the distal colorectum (10.9 % vs. 0.9 %). In addition, no SSA/P was found in the rectum, and no SSA/P had cytological dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall proportion of SSA/Ps in E-HPs was 2.7 %, although this proportion was higher in the proximal colon and increased with the size of E-HPs. SSA/Ps were common in routine colonoscopy, with a prevalence of at least 5.0 %.

STUDY REGISTRATION

UMIN000010832.

Methods to become a high performer in characterization of colorectal polyp histology

The recent advent of advanced imaging technologies has brought real time characterization of polyp histology to the forefront. This concept of optical diagnosis of diminutive polyp histology can bring about a huge paradigm shift in the management of these lesions. Instead of resecting and sending all the diminutive polyps to pathology, there is the potential to practice "resect and discard" for those predicted to be adenomas and "do not resect" strategy for the recto-sigmoid polyps predicted to be hyperplastic. However, one of the major steps before the clinical implementation of real-time histology can be a reality, will be training endoscopists with varying levels of experience in novel imaging technologies. The two major methods for training include didactic teaching and the computer based method. After the initial training, it is imperative that the endoscopists practice this skill during performance of routine colonoscopy to auto validate and assess their own competency. Both practice and reinforcement can help endoscopists become high performers in the characterization of polyp histology.

Serrated lesions of the colon and rectum: the role of advanced endoscopic imaging

Conventional adenomas were traditionally thought to be the only precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC). Nowadays, also serrated polyps are acknowledged as precursor lesions for CRC, responsible for up to 30% of all CRCs and probably a larger percentage of interval CRCs after colonoscopy. In recent years, much research is being done to unravel the serrated neoplasia pathway. Endoscopic detection of serrated polyps is still a challenge for gastroenterologists, which is illustrated by large variations in detection rates of serrated polyps in the proximal colon. Clinical practice is further inhibited by poor optical differentiation of SSA/Ps from conventional adenomas and HPs and difficult delineation of those lesions, resulting in incomplete resection. The main focus of this review is to highlight recent advancements in endoscopic imaging techniques with regards to detection, differentiation and resection of serrated polyps.

Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Significantly Impairs Colonoscopic Detection of Non-polypoid Colorectal Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the quality of bowel preparation affects colonoscopic detection of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs).

AIM

To evaluate the impact of bowel-cleansing quality on detection of NP-CRNs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of asymptomatic screening colonoscopy cases after standardized bowel preparation at an academic teaching hospital between June 2011 and May 2013. Primary outcome was a comparison of the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of non-polypoid morphology according to quality of bowel preparation. Secondary outcomes included detection prevalence of non-polypoid adenomas.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled 6097 screening examinations, the preparation quality was rated as adequate (excellent or good) in 5224 (85.7 %), fair in 615 (10.1 %), and poor in 258 (4.2 %) patients. The prevalence of NP-CRNs was 40.5 % (1962/4847) of all CRNs. The overall ADR of non-polypoid morphology was 12.3 % (747/6097) of all colonoscopies, but it significantly differed among participating endoscopists (all P < 0.05). The ADR of non-polypoid morphology was significantly lower with fair- or poor-quality preparation, versus adequate-quality preparation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.75; aOR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.30-0.79, respectively). Poor-quality preparation was also associated with impaired detection of polypoid, proximal colon, and sub-centimeter adenomas (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal (fair or poor) bowel preparation significantly impairs colonoscopic detection of NP-CRNs. Given that the prevalence of NP-CRNs is substantial in our average-risk screening cohort, ongoing efforts to improve the preparation quality are practically valuable in increasing the detection of NP-CRNs, thereby improving the efficacy of screening colonoscopies.

A prospective dual-center proof-of-principle study evaluating the incremental benefit of narrow-band imaging with a fixed zoom function in real-time prediction of polyp histology. Can we resect and discard?

BACKGROUND

Advancements in endoscopic technology have increased the ability to distinguish neoplastic polyps during colonoscopy. If a minimum accuracy can be achieved, then a resect-and-discard model can be implemented, although studies to date have demonstrated limited success, especially in the assessment of serrated polyps.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a proof-of-principle study assessing the accuracy of narrow-band imaging with near focus in predicting polyp histology including serrated polyps and to determine whether the minimum requirements can be achieved for a resect-and-discard policy.

DESIGN

Dual-center, prospective case series.

SETTING

Two tertiary-care referral endoscopic centers in Australia.

PATIENTS

Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy for routine indications were recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

Any polyps identified were assessed by using standard white light followed by narrow-band imaging with near focus for Kudo pit patterns and modified Sano capillary patterns. Based on this assessment and the macroscopic appearance, the polyp histology was predicted and subsequently compared with histopathology results.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Correlation in postpolypectomy surveillance intervals between endoscopic and pathologic assessments as well as negative predictive value for rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps.

RESULTS

There was a 96% agreement for surveillance intervals between endoscopic assessment and histology by using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. There was a 96% negative predictive value in assessing rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps.

LIMITATIONS

Because this was a proof-of-principle study, there was no control arm, and there were small numbers, especially in assessing subgroups. The results have limited generalizability with the training requirements for polyp recognition, with confidence to be determined.

CONCLUSION

Narrow-band imaging with near focus can predict polyp histology (including serrated polyps) accurately in the hands of trained endoscopists. Further studies with larger numbers are required to further validate this practice.

Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum: Endoscopic features including image enhanced endoscopy

In this review, I outline the characteristic endoscopic findings of serrated lesions of the colorectum based on image enhanced endoscopy (IEE). Histopathologically, lesions with serrated structures are typically classified into the following three types based: hyperplastic polyps (HPs), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), and sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps). Both HP and SSA/P often present as dark-green colors on auto fluorescence imaging (AFI) colonoscopy that are similar to the normal surrounding mucosa. In contrast, TSAs often have elevated shapes and present as magenta colors that are similar to the tubular adenomas. The superficial type of TSA also includes many lesions that present as magenta colors. When SSA/Ps are associated with cytological dysplasia, many lesions present with magenta colors, whereas lesions that are not associated with cytological dysplasia present with dark-green colors. When observed via narrow band imaging (NBI), many SSA/P include lesions with strong mucous adhesions. Because these lesions are observed with reddish mucous adhesions, we refer to them as “red cap sign” and place such signs among the typical findings of SSA/P. Because the dilatation of the pit in SSA/P is observed as a round/oval black dot on magnified observations, we refer to this finding as II-dilatation pit (II-D pit) and also positioned it as a characteristic finding of SSA/P. In contrast, dilatations of the capillary vessels surrounding the glands, such as those that occur in tubular adenoma, are not considered to be useful for differentiating HPs from SSA/Ps. However, in cases in which SSA/P is associated with cytological dysplasia, the dilatation of capillary vessels is observed in the same area. When submucosal layer invasion occurs in the same area, the blood flow presents with irregularities that are similar to those of common colorectal cancer at an early stage and disappears as the invasion proceeds deeply. The surface pattern of invasive cancer that is observed at the tumor surface is also likely to disappear. Based on the above results, we considered that the differentiations between HP and TSA, between TSA and SSA/P, and between HP and SSA/P might become easier due to the concomitant use of white light observation and IEE. We also concluded that AFI and NBI can be useful modalities for SSA/P lesions associated with cytological dysplasia.

Investigating endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps by using narrow-band imaging with optical magnification

BACKGROUND

A sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) is a common type of colorectal polyp that possesses malignant potential. Although narrow-band imaging (NBI) can easily differentiate neoplastic lesions from hyperplastic polyps (HPs), SSA/Ps can be a challenge to distinguish from HPs.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate specific endoscopic features of SSA/Ps by using NBI with optical magnification.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Single high-volume referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 289 patients with histopathologically proven SSA/Ps or HPs obtained from colonoscopic polypectomy.

INTERVENTION

Endoscopic images obtained by using NBI with optical magnification of 242 lesions (124 HPs, 118 SSA/Ps) removed between January 2010 and December 2012 were independently evaluated by 2 experienced endoscopists. Three external experienced endoscopists systematically validated the diagnostic accuracies by using 40 lesions (21 HPs and 19 SSA/Ps) removed between January and March 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Specific endoscopic features of SSA/Ps by using 5 potential characteristics: dilated and branching vessels (DBVs), irregular dark spots, a regular network pattern, a disorganized network pattern, and a dense pattern.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that DBV had a 2.3-fold odds ratio (95% confidence interval, 0.96-5.69) among SSA/Ps compared with HPs (sensitivity, 56%; specificity, 75%; accuracy, 65%). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement indicated almost perfect agreement for DBVs in both the evaluation and validation studies. When DBVs, proximal location, and tumor size (≥10 mm) were combined, the positive predictive value was 92% and the area under the curve was 0.783 in the receiver-operating characteristics by using the validation group.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that a DBV is a potentially unique endoscopic feature of a colorectal SSA/P.

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps with a depressed surface: a rare form of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) usually appear flat to sessile with a smooth-appearing surface. However, macroscopic appearances of SSA/P can vary from flat-elevated to nodular and can even show a pedunculated configuration as we previously reported. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of another under-recognized form of SSA/P which shows a depressed surface. Among 634 cases of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp, a total of seven sessile serrated adenoma/polyps showing a depressed surface were identified in 6 patients during the review of endoscopic images between January 2013 and November 2013. One of these was found during the review of previous endoscopic images of the same patient. Patients were more often middle-aged to elderly men (83.3 %) and had synchronous conventional adenomas and/or SSA/Ps except for one man. The polyps usually occurred in the proximal colon (71.4 %) and the mean size of polyps was 9.3 mm (range; 6-13 mm). Most cases (71.4 %) were of a flat-elevated type, and the remaining polyps (28.6 %) were sessile. The majority of polyps (85.7 %) showed a mucus cap. All but one of the cases (85.7 %) showed BRAF-V600E mutations. Our findings are that SSA/Ps can show a central depression although such cases are rare. The endoscopic and clinicopathologic features of SSA/Ps showing a depressed surface appear to be similar to usual SSA/Ps except for the presence of a depressed surface and marked male preponderance.

Virtual slides: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1562070886167874.

Prospective evaluation of endoscopic criteria characteristic of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps

BACKGROUND

Differentiating sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) from hyperplastic polyp (HP) is clinically important in determining the necessity of endoscopic resection or recommending appropriate surveillance. There are few reports of characterization of SSA/P using narrowband imaging and chromoendoscopy with and without magnification. We aimed to establish imaging criteria to aid real-time diagnosis of SSA/P.

METHODS

Patients with pale sessile or flat lesions of 6 mm or greater were prospectively enrolled in this multicenter trial. Nine endoscopic criteria, determined in real time, were investigated for possible association with SSA/P. Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed; specimens were retrieved and analyzed by histopathological examination.

RESULTS

In 63 patients, 89 lesions were detected, including 41 HP, 38 SSA/P, five mixed polyps, and five other lesions. Right-side colon location, lesion size of 10 mm or greater, excessive mucus, the presence of a varicose microvascular vessel (VMV) noted with high-magnification narrowband imaging, and type III(H) pit pattern were each commonly associated with SSA/P compared with HP. Multivariate analysis substantiated three independent endoscopic criteria for SSA/P: the presence of VMV (p = 0.001), lesion size of 10 mm or greater (p = 0.0017), and right-side location (p = 0.0041), with odds ratios of 8.2, 7.2, and 6.1, respectively. The presence of VMV had a significantly higher specificity (87.8%) than the other two independent endoscopic criteria (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0008, respectively), but a lower sensitivity (57.9%), whereas a combination of the three criteria (two or more positive) increased the sensitivity significantly (89.5% and p = 0.0033) and had a higher degree of accuracy (82.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Three endoscopic criteria individually and in combination were effective in predicting a diagnosis of SSA/P without the need for chromoendoscopy.

Colorectal neoplasia pathways: state of the art

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease and each CRC possesses a unique molecular tumor profile. The main pathways of oncogenesis are the chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability and serrated neoplasia pathway. Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) may be the precursor lesions of CRC arising via the serrated neoplasia pathway. This has led to a paradigm shift because all SSA/Ps should be detected and resected during colonoscopy. The ability to accurately detect and resect only those polyps with a malignant potential could result in safer and cost-effective practice. Optimization of the endoscopic classification systems is however needed to implement targeted prevention methods.

Tools for polyp histology prediction

Although removal of adenomatous polyps has been shown to decrease the risk of colon cancer, distal hyperplastic polyps are thought to not have malignant potential. Most polyps detected during colonoscopy are diminutive (≤ 5 mm) and rarely harbor advanced histology, such as high-grade dysplasia or cancer. Therefore, predicting histology in real-time during colonoscopy can potentially decrease the enormous expenditure that ensues from universal histopathologic evaluation of polyps, and several novel imaging technologies have been developed and tested over the past decade for this purpose. Of these different technologies, electronic chromoendoscopy seems to strike a fair balance between accuracy, feasibility, and cost.

Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile colonic polyps: a single-center experience

Colonoscopic polypectomy has been shown to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and the mortality. Postpolypectomy bleeding was reported to be lower with cold snare polypectomy (CSP) when compared with conventional polypectomy. CSP has traditionally been utilized only in smaller polyps below 1 cm. We retrospectively analyzed the CSP outcomes in patients with sessile polyps ≥10 mm in size and observed that CSP was feasible in large sessile polyps with no adverse events and with an acceptable rate of residual polyp on follow-up colonoscopy. Further prospective study in larger patient groups is warranted to determine optimal CSP techniques and whether CSP for large polyps has favorable efficacy in regard to complete polypectomy, procedure time, and complication rates relative to polypectomy with cautery.

Endoscopic and histologic characteristics of serrated lesions

In recent years, a second pathway for colonic carcinogenesis, distinct from the adenomatous pathway, has been explored. This is referred to as serrated pathway and includes three types of polyp, characterised by a serrated appearance of the crypts: hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) or lesions, and traditional serrated adenomas. Each lesion has its own genetic, as well as macroscopic and microscopic morphological features. Because of their flat aspect, their detection is easier with chromoendoscopy (carmin indigo or narrow-band imaging). However, as we show in this review, the distinction between SSA and HP is quite difficult. It is now recommended to resect in one piece as it is possible the serrated polyps with a control in a delay depending on the presence or not of dysplasia. These different types of lesion are described in detail in the present review in general population, in polyposis and in inflammatory bowel diseases patients. This review highlights the need to improve characterization and understanding of this way of colorectal cancerogenesis.

How does the serrated polyp pathway alter CRC screening and surveillance?

Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces mortality through the detection of early-stage adenocarcinoma, and more importantly the detection and removal of premalignant polyps. While adenomas have historically been considered the most common and screening-relevant precursor lesions, there is accumulating evidence showing that the serrated pathway is an important contributor to CRC, and a disproportionate contributor to interval or postcolonoscopy CRC, particularly in the proximal colon. The serrated pathway is characterized by mutations in the BRAF gene, high levels of methylation of promoter CpG islands (CIMP-high), and the sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) is the most important precursor lesion. The study of serrated polyps has been complicated by evolving nomenclature, substantial variation among pathologists in the identification of SSA/Ps, high variability in endoscopic detection rates, and uncertainty regarding the relation to synchronous and metachronous colonic neoplasia. This paper presents an overview of the serrated polyp pathway and discusses its clinical implications including its impact on CRC screening.

Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates

BACKGROUND

Inadequate bowel cleansing is associated with missed lesions, yet whether polyp and adenoma detection rates (PDR, ADR) increase at the highest levels of bowel cleanliness is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between bowel preparation quality by using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and PDR and ADR among colonoscopies with adequate preparation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Boston Medical Center (BMC) and the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI).

PATIENTS

Average-risk ambulatory patients attending screening colonoscopy with adequate bowel preparation defined as BBPS score ≥6.

INTERVENTIONS

Colonoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

PDR and ADR stratified by BBPS score.

RESULTS

Among the 3713 colonoscopies at BMC performed by 19 endoscopists, the PDR, ADR, and advanced ADR were 49.8%, 37.7%, and 6.0%, respectively. Among the 5532 colonoscopies in CORI performed by 85 endoscopists at 41 different sites, the PDR was 44.5%, and the PDR for polyps >9 mm (surrogate for advanced ADR) was 6.2%. The PDR associated with total BBPS scores of 6, 7, and 8 were higher than those associated with a BBPS score of 9 at BMC (BBPS 6, 51%; BBPS 7, 53%; BBPS 8, 52% vs BBPS 9, 46%; P = .002) and CORI (BBPS 6, 51%; BBPS 7, 48%; BBPS 8, 45% vs BBPS 9, 40%; P < .0001). This trend persisted after we adjusted for age, sex, and race and/or ethnicity and was observed for ADR and advanced ADR. PDR was higher among good compared with excellent preparations at BMC (odds ratio [OR] 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.5) and CORI (OR 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1-7.1).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

The PDR and ADR decreased at the highest levels of bowel cleanliness. Endoscopists finding a pristine bowel preparation should avoid a sense of overconfidence for polyp detection during the inspection phase of screening colonoscopy and still perform a careful evaluation for polyps. Furthermore, endoscopists expending additional effort to maximize cleansing of the bowel should never sacrifice on their inspection technique or inspection time.

Sessile serrated polyp prevalence determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate and an experienced pathologist

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas and/or polyps (SSA/Ps) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of SSA/Ps and SSA/Ps with cytologic dysplasia (SSA/P-CD) by using a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate and an expert in serrated lesion pathology.

DESIGN

Retrospective screening colonoscopy study.

SETTING

Academic endoscopy unit.

PATIENTS

A total of 1910 average risk, asymptomatic patients aged ≥50 years underwent screening colonoscopy between August 2005 and April 2012 by a single colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate.

INTERVENTIONS

Slides of all lesions in the serrated class proximal to the sigmoid colon and all rectal and sigmoid colon serrated lesions >5 mm in size were reviewed by an experienced GI pathologist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Prevalence of SSA/Ps, defined as the proportion of patients with ≥1 SSA/P.

RESULTS

There were 1910 patients, of whom 389 had 656 lesions in the serrated class. Review by the experienced GI pathologist determined a prevalence of SSA/Ps without cytologic dysplasia of 7.4% and SSA/Ps-CD of 0.6% (total SSA/P prevalence 8.1%). SSA/Ps and SSA/Ps-CD comprised 5.6% and 0.3%, respectively, of all resected polyps. The mean size of SSA/Ps was 7.13 mm (standard deviation [SD] 4.66), and 51 of 77 (66.2%) polyps ≥10 mm in the serrated class were SSA/Ps.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSION

A colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate and an experienced pathologist identified a high prevalence (8.1%) of SSA/Ps in a screening population. SSA/Ps are more common than previously believed.

Colonoscopy: the current king of the hill in the USA

Colonoscopy is the dominant colorectal cancer screening strategy in the USA. There are no randomized controlled trials completed of screening colonoscopy, but multiple lines of evidence establish that colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence in both the proximal and distal colon. Colonoscopy is highly operator dependent, but systematic efforts to measure and improve quality are impacting performance. Colonoscopy holds a substantial advantage over other strategies for detection of serrated lesions, and a recent case-control study suggests that once-only colonoscopy or colonoscopy at 20-year intervals, by a high-level detector, could ensure lifetime protection from colorectal cancer for many patients.

Sessile serrated polyps: detection, eradication, and prevention of the evil twin

OPINION STATEMENT

The sessile serrated polyp (SSP), also known as sessile serrated adenoma, is the evil twin among the colorectal cancer precursors. As will be described, these lesions have multiple aliases (serrated adenoma, serrated polyp, or serrated lesion among others), they hang out in a bad neighborhood (the poorly prepped right colon), they hide behind a mask of mucus, they are difficult for witnesses (pathologists) to identify, they are difficult for police (endoscopists) to find, they are difficult to permanently remove from the society (high incomplete resection rate), they can be impulsive (progress rapidly to colorectal cancer (CRC)), and enforcers (gastroenterologists) do not know how best to control them (uncertain surveillance recommendations). There is no wonder that there is a need to understand these lesions well, learn how best to prevent the colonic mucosa from going down this errant path or, if that fails, detect these deviants and eradicate them from the colonic society. These lesions should be on endoscopists' most wanted list.

Sessile serrated adenomas: an evidence-based guide to management

The concept of serrated colorectal neoplasia and a serrated pathway to colorectal cancer (CRC) is relatively new and continuing to evolve, but it has become highly relevant to gastroenterologists, pathologist, and oncologists alike. Sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) are now thought to be the major precursor lesion of serrated pathway cancers, which represent up to one-third of all sporadic CRC cases. However, despite their increasingly recognized importance, relatively little is known about the epidemiology and natural history of SSAs, and the molecular and epigenetic aspects are incompletely understood. Endoscopists must be aware of the unique features of SSAs so that the practice of colonoscopic screening for CRC can include optimized detection, removal, and appropriate surveillance of SSAs and other serrated precursor lesions. In this review, we discuss the history, epidemiology, and pathologic aspects of SSAs, as well as a recommended management approach and a discussion of uncertainties and opportunities for future research.

Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The narrow band imaging classification system (NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic [NICE] classification) classifies colorectal polyps very accurately. However, sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) pathologically resembles hyperplastic polyp and has a possibility to be left in situ on NICE classification. The aim of this study was to establish and evaluate new simple diagnostic features for SSA/Ps using magnifying narrow band imaging (M-NBI).

METHODS

We performed a single-arm observational study of diagnostic accuracy in two stages, as follows: seeking stage, development of simple diagnostic features for SSA/P and definition of diagnostic criteria based on retrospective assessments of M-NBI; and validation stage, prospective validation and evaluation of the new diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

In the seeking stage, we identified brownish, oval, expanded crypt openings and thick-branched vessels on the surfaces of SSA/Ps. We named these "expanded crypt openings" (ECOs) and "thick and branched vessels" (TBVs), respectively. In the validation stage, we enrolled 796 polyps in 261 patients, and classified 126 polyps as NICE type 1; all these lesions were endoscopically removed and assessed histopathologically. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ECOs for SSA/Ps were 84.3%, 81.1%, and 82.4%, whereas those of TBVs were 45.1%, 68.9%, and 59.2%, respectively. M-NBI provided a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 59.5% for discrimination of SSA/Ps from other lesions classified as NICE type 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of ECOs, supplemented with TBVs, has high sensitivity for the diagnosis of SSA/P. These findings may facilitate the use of endoscopic optical diagnosis in clinical practice.

Serrated and non-serrated precursor lesions of colorectal cancer

Although often viewed as a single disease, colorectal cancer more accurately represents a family of diseases with different precursor lesions. Conventional (tubular, tubulovillous and villous) adenomas are the most common neoplastic lesions occurring in the large intestine. They have adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations and arise from dysplastic aberrant crypt foci, initially as polyclonal lesions. In sporadic tumours, neoplastic progression follows the traditional pathway (chromosomal instability pathway), resulting in CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-negative, microsatellite-stable (MSS), BRAF and KRAS wild-type cancers. Germline mutations in the APC gene lead to familial adenomatous polyposis. Conventional adenomas are also the precursors of Lynch syndrome-associated microsatellite-instable (MSI-high) cancers. Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) is the principal precursor lesion of the serrated pathway, in which BRAF mutation can lead to colorectal cancer with MSI-high CIMP-high or MSS CIMP-high phenotype. SSA/Ps have been associated with synchronous and metachronous invasive adenocarcinomas as well as so-called interval carcinomas. Serrated polyposis is rare but most likely underdiagnosed. Affected individuals bear an increased but unspecified risk for the development of colorectal cancer; close endoscopic surveillance is warranted. Traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) are much less common than the other serrated lesions. Cancers originating from TSAs may show KRAS mutation with a CIMP-high MSS phenotype.

Finding sessile serrated adenomas: is it possible to identify them during conventional colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Proximal colorectal cancer may arise from sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs). Recognition of these lesions during colonoscopy can optimize the endoscopic approach. We aimed to identify specific endoscopic features of SSA with conventional colonoscopy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing screening colonoscopies from January 2011 to September 2012, in whom colonic polyps were found, were prospectively included in our study. Polyp morphology, location, polyp pit pattern (Kudo classification), and other previously reported features of SSA were evaluated. Histological examination was conducted independently by two pathologists. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of SSA.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients were included, and 440 polyps were evaluated (1.6 polyps per patient). Thirty-four polyps (8%) were SSA, 135 (31%) hyperplastic, and 249 (56%) adenomas. The most prevalent endoscopic features of SSA were right-side location (94%), type II Kudo pit pattern (91%), mucus cap (41%), flat morphology (29%) and red-colored surface (26%). Multivariate analysis revealed that flat morphology (p = 0.002, OR = 3.81 CI 1.53-9.09), red-colored surface (p < 0.001, OR = 12.97 CI 4.43-37.69), right-side location (p < 0.001, OR = 22.21 CI 5.09-135.94) and mucus cap (p < 0.001, OR 8.77 CI 3.76-20.44) were independent predictors of SSA.

CONCLUSION

We were able to identify specific features of SSA during conventional colonoscopy, which may help to identify, and therefore to optimize the endoscopic approach of these lesions.