Update on fluoroquinolone resistance in Helicobacter pylori: new mutations leading to resistance and first description of a gyrA polymorphism associated with hypersusceptibility

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to six antibiotics currently used in Spain

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance is directly related to the loss of efficacy of currently accepted Helicobacter pylori therapies. Knowledge of the antibiotic susceptibility in a local area can contribute to the design of specific 'à la carte' treatments. The aim of this study was to analyse the susceptibility of H. pylori isolates to six conventional antibiotics currently used in a northern region of Spain.

METHODS

Seventy-one isolates were obtained from gastric biopsies of 76 consecutive adult patients suffering from peptic ulcer disease, dyspepsia or familial gastric cancer and known to be infected with H. pylori by conventional methods. Susceptibility testing was performed for amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline using the Etest method.

RESULTS

The prevalence rates of resistance were as follows: amoxicillin, 1.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0-7.6]; clarithromycin, 14.7% (95% CI 7.3-25.4); ciprofloxacin, 14.3% (95% CI 7.1-24.7); levofloxacin, 14.5% (95% CI 7.2-25.0); metronidazole, 45.1% (95% CI 33.2-57.3); and tetracycline, 0% (95% CI 0.0-5.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms an increasing rate of resistance to levofloxacin that equals that of clarithromycin in our healthcare area. This fact may reflect a wide and indiscriminate use of the former antibiotic and could account for a loss of clinical effectiveness of levofloxacin-containing regimens. Moreover, clarithromycin resistance rates remain stable, which could allow us to maintain its use in our area.

Mechanisms of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance: An updated appraisal

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibiotic resistance is the main factor affecting the efficacy of the current eradicating therapies. The aim of this editorial is to report on the recent information about the mechanisms accounting for the resistance to the different antibiotics currently utilized in H. pylori eradicating treatments. Different mechanisms of resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, quinolones, amoxicillin and tetracycline are accurately detailed (point mutations, redox intracellular potential, pump efflux systems, membrane permeability) on the basis of the most recent data available from the literature. The next hope for the future is that by improving the knowledge of resistance mechanisms, the elaboration of rational and efficacious associations for the treatment of the infection will be possible. Another auspicious progress might be the possibility of a cheap, feasible and reliable laboratory test to predict the outcome of a therapeutic scheme.

High Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole but zero or low resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and other antibiotics in Malaysia

OBJECTIVE

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is the single most important determinant of treatment success. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin, amoxicillin, metronidazole, tetracycline, levofloxacin, rifabutin, and furazolidone in our local bacterial strains.

METHODS

Samples from consecutive ninety patients were obtained for culture and sensitivity testing. Resistance to individual antibiotics were tested using the E-test and MIC(90) read from the strips. Resistance to rifampicin and nitrofurantoin were used as a surrogate for rifabutin and furazolidine.

RESULTS

There was a high prevalence of resistance to metronidazole 68/90 (75.5%). No male (34/45 (75.5%) versus female (35/45 (77.7%) difference in frequency of metronidazole resistance was noted (p = 1.000). There was zero resistance (0) to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and nitrofurantoin/furazolidone. Resistance to rifampicin/rifabutin was for breakpoints of 1 and 4 μg/mL of 14.4 and 2.2% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was high bacterial resistance to metronidazole, the absence of resistance particularly to the key antibiotics used in H. pylori eradication therapy: clarithromycin and levofloxacin is reassuring to note. Continued monitoring of antibiotic resistance should be carried out.

Levofloxacin susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori in China: comparison of E-test and disk diffusion method

BACKGROUND

 The aims of this study were to compare disk diffusion with E-test method for levofloxacin susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori and standardized breakpoints for disk diffusion as a stable and reliable method for determining qualitative levofloxacin susceptibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 We determined the levofloxacin susceptibility of 45 H. pylori strains isolated from Chinese patients by the E-test method. Disk diffusion was evaluated as an alternative method to determine susceptibility and compared with the E-test results by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values tested by E-test method ranged from 0.047 to 32 μg/mL. Resistance to levofloxacin was detected in 16 (35.6%) isolates. The levofloxacin disk zone sizes obtained by disk diffusion method correlated well (r² = .877) with the MICs obtained by E-test method. As a consequence of regression analysis, isolates with inhibition diameters < 12 mm were considered resistant to levofloxacin. There was 100% agreement between the two methods for levofloxacin, applying the regression-based breakpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

The disk diffusion method is equivalent to the E-test method for testing levofloxacin susceptibility of H. pylori strains; it is more practical and inexpensive, and it is suitable for the analysis of a small number of isolates compared with the E-test method.

Should quinolones come first in Helicobacter pylori therapy?

New generations of fluoroquinolones, like levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, exhibit a broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and have been successfully introduced into the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Based on a large body of evidence, current guidelines recommend the use of levofloxacin- or moxifloxacin-containing proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) triple therapies in second-line or rescue treatment of H. pylori infection. The efficacy of standard PPI triple therapies has substantially declined during the last decade, mainly due to increasing resistance against the key antibiotics clarithromycin and metronidazole. Therefore, alternative strategies for first-line therapy of H. pylori infection have been evaluated in a considerable number of clinical trials including sequential regimens, nonbismuth quadruple regimens, and quinolone-containing PPI triple therapy regimens. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current body of evidence of levofloxacin- and moxifloxacin-containing regimens in first-line treatment of H. pylori infection, and to discuss the risks and benefits of these strategies in the light of increasing resistance of H. pylori to quinolones.

Genotypic resistance in Helicobacter pylori strains correlates with susceptibility test and treatment outcomes after levofloxacin- and clarithromycin-based therapies

The accuracy of genotypic resistance to levofloxacin (gyrA mutations) and its agreement with treatment outcomes after levofloxacin-based therapy have not been reported. We aimed to assess the correlation. Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from patients who received levofloxacin-based and clarithromycin-based triple therapies in a previous randomized trial were analyzed for point mutations in gyrA and 23S rRNA. PCR followed by direct sequencing was used to assess the gyrA and 23S rRNA mutations. An agar dilution test was used to determine the MICs of clarithromycin and levofloxacin. We found that the agreement between genotypic and phenotypic resistance to levofloxacin was best when the MIC breakpoint was >1 μg/ml (kappa coefficient, 0.754). The eradication rates in patients with and without gyrA mutations were 41.7% and 82.7%, respectively (P = 0.003). The agreement between genotypic and phenotypic resistance to clarithromycin was best when the MIC breakpoint was >2 μg/ml (kappa, 0.694). The eradication rates in patients with and without 23S rRNA mutations were 7.7% and 93.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). The agreements (kappa coefficient) between therapeutic outcomes after clarithromycin-based triple therapy and genotypic and phenotypic resistance were 0.671 and 0.356, respectively. The agreements (kappa coefficient) between therapeutic outcomes after levofloxacin-based triple therapy and genotypic and phenotypic resistance were 0.244 and 0.190, respectively. In conclusion, gyrA and 23S rRNA mutations in H. pylori strains appeared to be better markers than phenotypic resistance in the prediction of treatment outcomes. The optimal breakpoints for levofloxacin and clarithromycin resistance appeared to be >1 μg/ml and >2 μg/ml, respectively.

Mutant prevention concentrations of fluoroquinolones against Helicobacter pylori

AIM: To compare the mutant prevention concentrations (MPC) of four fluoroquinolones against fluoroquinolone-susceptible clinical Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) isolates.

METHODS: Sixteen clinical isolates of H.pylori were enriched in broth and adjusted to 10¹⁰ colony-forming units per milliliter. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and provisional MPC (MPCpr) of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were determined using the agar plate dilution method. The 50% MIC (MIC₅₀), 90% MIC (MIC₉₀), and 90% provisional MPC (MPCpr₉₀) for fluoroquinolone-susceptible H.pylori isolates were then calculated.

RESULTS: When the breakpoints for fluoroquinolone resistance were defined as >1.0 mg/L, there were 2, 1, 4 and 2 H.pylori strains resistant to moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. The MIC₅₀ of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for fluoroquinolone-susceptible H.pylori isolates were 0.13, 0.13, 0.25 and 0.50, respectively, while the MIC₉₀ were 0.50, 0.50, 1.00 and 0.50 mg/L, respectively. The MPCpr₉₀ of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were 8.0, 2.0, 8.0 and 2.0 mg/L, and the ratios of MPCpr₉₀ to MIC₉₀ were 16.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 4.0, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The anti-H.pylori activity of gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin might be stronger than that of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, and the capacity of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin restricting the selection of resistant mutants appears to be stronger than that of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in the treatment of H.pylori infection.

In vitro activity of nemonoxacin, tigecycline, and other antimicrobial agents against Helicobacter pylori isolates in Taiwan, 1998-2007

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 330 nonduplicate Helicobacter pylori isolates to nemonoxacin, tigecycline, and eight other antimicrobial agents were determined by using the agar dilution method. Sequencing the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) in the gyrA gene of these isolates was also performed. Resistance to clarithromycin showed an increasing trend during the ten-year study period and was highest (38%) in 2005. Tigecycline had potent in vitro activities against all isolates, with an MIC(90) of 0.06 μg/ml. Among the quinolones tested, nemonoxacin (MIC(50) of 0.12 μg/ml and MIC(90) of 0.25 μg/ml) and gemifloxacin had one to two-fold better in vitro activities than ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Among the nine isolates (2.7%) with levofloxacin resistance, four (44.4%) were also resistant to metronidazole, three (33.3%) to clarithromycin, and two (22.2%) to amoxicillin. Isolates with levofloxacin resistance exhibited one or two of three amino acid alterations (Ser-70, Asn-87, and Asp-91) involved in QRDRs in the gyrA gene. A double mutation at Ser70Cys and Asn87Ile had a higher level of resistance. The results of this study suggest a potentially useful role of nemonoxacin and tigecycline in the treatment of infections caused by H. pylori. The gyrA mutation at Ser-70 is a novel finding and has an impact on levofloxacin resistance.

Distribution of gyrA mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains

AIM: To investigate the resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) to ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX) and moxifloxacin (MOX) in the Beijing area and to elucidate the resistance mechanisms.

METHODS: Seventy-nine H. pylori clinical strains, isolated from patients who had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Peking University First Hospital from 2007 to 2009, were tested for their susceptibility to CIP, LVX and MOX using the E-test method. H. pylori strain 26695 was included in the susceptibility testing as a control strain. According to the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, a strain was classified as resistant to CIP, LVX or MOX when the MIC was > 1 μg/mL. We amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequenced the quinolone resistance-determining regions of the gyrA and gyrB genes from 29 quinolone-resistant and 16 quinolone-susceptible H. pylori strains selected at random.

RESULTS: In this study, the resistance rates of H. pylori to CIP, LVX or MOX were 55.7% (44/79), and the primary resistance rates were 26.6% (21/79). Patients with secondary resistance had received LVX in previous eradication treatments, but not MOX or CIP. Forty-five strains, including 29 CIP, LVX or MOX-resistant strains (MIC: 1.5-32 μg/mL) and 16 susceptible strains, were selected randomly from the 79 strains and used in PCR analysis. Among these 45 strains, 27 resistant strains had mutations in the gyrA gene, including 11 strains with mutations corresponding to Asp-91 (MIC: 2-32 μg/mL), one of which also had a mutation corresponding to Val-150, and 16 strains had mutations at Asn-87 (MIC: 4-32 μg/mL), three of which also had mutations corresponding to Arg-140 or Val-150. In addition, Arg-140, Val-150 or Ala-97 mutations were separately detected in three susceptible strains. Analysis of the gyrB gene showed that one strain of low resistance had a mutation corresponding to Ser-457 that coexisted with an Asp-91 mutation. There was a significant difference in the occurrence of mutations in the gyrA gene between CIP, LVX and MOX-resistant and -susceptible strains (P < 0.05), but 2 resistant strains were found to possess no quinolone resistance-determining region mutations.

CONCLUSION: Resistance is primarily mediated through point mutations in gyrA. Whether other mechanisms are responsible for resistance in strains without mutations in the QRDR should be detected.

Antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori to the outcome of 10-days vs. 7-days Moxifloxacin based therapy for the eradication: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Antibiotic resistance decreases success of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication. Recently published results show low rate of resistance and better compliance with moxifloxacin based regiments.

Aims&methods

Whether 7 days moxifloxacin with lansoprasole and amoxycillin can be compared with 10 days moxifloxacin with lansoprasole and amoxycillin according to moxifloxacin resistance. Patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia who had culture and histology positive Hp infection (n = 150) were randomly assigned into two groups. The first group (n = 75) received moxifloxacin 400 mg/d during 7 days and the other (n = 75) received moxifloxacin 400 mg/d during 10 days. All patients received amoxycillin 1 g twice daily, lansoprasole 30 mg twice daily. All Hp cultures were tested for sensitivity to moxifloxacin.

Results

138 patients (92%) completed the study, 68 in the first group and 70 in the second. Eradication rates were 84% (57/68) and 76% (57/75) in the 7 days moxifloxacin group and 90% and 84% in the second group (63/70, 63/75) according to the PP and ITT analysis; p = n.s. Among 129 patients (86% of study group), 6% of strains were primary resistant to moxifloxacin.

Eradication of moxifloxacin sensitive/resistant strains was 98%/66%, p < 0.05

Conclusion

According to our results we recommend 7 days moxiflixacin based triple therapy.

Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests in children: review of the literature from 1999 to 2009

The array of tests that can be used for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection is large, and it can be confusing to define which test to use particularly in children where results may not be comparable to those obtained in adult patients. Using PubMed, we reviewed the English literature from January 1999 to May 2009 to identify articles that determined sensitivity and specificity of H. pylori invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tests in children. We excluded articles that presented a review of the literature, abstracts, case reports, or series where children's results could not be separated from adult populations. Of the tissue based methods, rapid urease tests have better sensitivity than histology to detect presence of H. pylori; however, histology can detect the pathology associated with disease including gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and other conditions that could be the cause of the child's symptoms. Culture of gastric tissues or stool has 100% specificity but sensitivity is low. Of the serologic tests, immunoblot has the best sensitivity. The urea breath tests have >75% sensitivity for detection of H. pylori before and after treatment. Immunoassays in stool using monoclonal antibodies have >95% sensitivity for detection of H. pylori before and after treatment. PCR testing can be performed in tissue and stool samples and can detect genes associated to antibiotic resistance. In summary, the current commercial non-invasive tests have adequate sensitivity and specificity for detecting the presence of H. pylori; however, endoscopy with histopathology is the only method that can detect H. pylori and lesions associated with the infection.

Clarithromycin-amoxycillin-containing triple therapy: a valid empirical first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Hong Kong?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested the eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori infection with standard amoxycillin-clarithromycin-containing triple therapy as first-line treatment have fallen below 80%. Levofloxacin-containing triple therapy was proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the standard 7-day clarithromycin-containing triple therapy against the 7-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapy, and to assess whether the classical triple therapy is still valid as empirical first-line treatment for H. pylori infection in Hong Kong.

METHODS

Three hundred consecutive H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive either 1 week of EAL (esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., and levofloxacin 500 mg daily) or EAC (esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d.). H. pylori status was rechecked by (13)C-urea breath test 6 weeks after treatment. Patients who failed either of the first-line eradication therapy were invited to undergo H. pylori susceptibility testing.

RESULTS

H. pylori eradication was achieved in 128 of 150 (85.3%) patients in EAL and 139 of 150 (92.7%) patients in EAC groups, respectively (p = .043), for both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. More patients in the clarithromycin- than the levofloxacin-containing therapy group developed side effects from the medication (21.3% vs 13.3%, p = .060). Nine patients (six from the EAL group and three from the EAC group) who failed their corresponding eradication therapy returned for susceptibility testing. All nine isolates were highly resistant to levofloxacin (minimum inhibitory concentration or MIC > 32 microg/mL), whereas only two of the six isolates from the EAL group were resistant to clarithromycin (MIC > 0.5 microg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The standard 7-day clarithromycin-containing triple therapy is still valid as the most effective empirical first-line eradication therapy for H. pylori infection in Hong Kong, as prevalence of primary resistance of H. pylori to amoxycillin and clarithromycin remains low. Patients who failed their empirical first-line eradication therapy should undergo H. pylori susceptibility testing to guide further treatment.

Second-line rescue therapy of helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection is the main known cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease and gastric cancer. After more than 20 years of experience in H. pylori treatment, however, the ideal regimen to treat this infection has still to be found. Nowadays, apart from having to know well first-line eradication regimens, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final (overall) eradication rate. The choice of a 'rescue' treatment depends on which treatment is used initially. If a first-line clarithromycin-based regimen was used, a second-line metronidazole-based treatment (quadruple therapy) may be used afterwards, and then a levofloxacin-based combination would be a third-line 'rescue' option. Alternatively, it has recently been suggested that levofloxacin-based 'rescue' therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, with the advantage of efficacy, simplicity and safety. In this case, quadruple regimen may be reserved as a third-line 'rescue' option. Finally, rifabutin-based 'rescue' therapy constitutes an encouraging empirical fourth-line strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and levofloxacin. Even after two consecutive failures, several studies have demonstrated that H. pylori eradication can finally be achieved in almost all patients if several 'rescue' therapies are consecutively given. Therefore, the attitude in H. pylori eradication therapy failure, even after two or more unsuccessful attempts, should be to fight and not to surrender.

Evaluation of a new test, genotype HelicoDR, for molecular detection of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori

The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori by standard therapy is decreasing due to antibiotic resistance, mainly to clarithromycin. Our aim was to provide a new molecular test to guide the treatment of new and relapsed cases. We first studied 126 H. pylori strains for phenotypic (MIC) and genotypic resistance to clarithromycin (rrl mutation) and levofloxacin (gyrA mutation) and then developed a DNA strip genotyping test on the basis of the correlation results and literature data. Clinical strains (n = 92) and gastric biopsy specimens containing H. pylori (n = 105) were tested blindly with the new molecular test GenoType HelicoDR. The presence of mutations or the absence of hybridization with wild-type sequences was predictive, in rrl for clarithromycin resistance in 91 cases (mostly the A2147G mutation) and in gyrA for levofloxacin resistance in 58 cases (mutations at codon 87 or 91). Genotyping revealed a mix of genotypes in 33% of the cases, reflecting a coinfection or selection for resistant mutants. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting resistance were 94% and 99% for clarithromycin and 87% and 98.5% for levofloxacin, respectively. The concordance scores were 0.96 for clarithromycin and 0.94 for levofloxacin. With global resistance rates of 46% for clarithromycin and 25% for levofloxacin, which were observed for consecutive positive biopsy specimens from 2007 and 2008, the positive and negative predictive values for detecting resistance were 99% and 94% for clarithromycin and 96% and 96% for fluoroquinolone. GenoType HelicoDR is efficient at detecting mutations predictive of antibiotic resistance in H. pylori when applied to strains or directly to gastric biopsy specimens.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

This article aims to examine current best practice in the field reference to first-line, second-line, rescue and emerging treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. The recommended first-line treatment in published guidelines in Europe and North American is proton pump inhibitor combined with amoxicillin and clarithromycin being the favoured regimen. Rates of eradication with this regimen however are falling alarmingly due to a combination of antibiotic resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Bismuth based quadruple therapies and levofloxacin based regimes have been shown to be effective second line regimens. Third-line options include regimes based on rifabutin or furazolidone, but susceptibility testing is the most rational option here, but is currently not used widely enough. Sequential therapy is promising but needs further study and validation outside of Italy. Although the success of first line treatments is falling, if compliance is good and a clear treatment paradigm adhered to, almost universal eradication rates can still be achieved. If compliance is not achievable, the problem of antibiotic resistance will continue to beset any combination of drugs used for H. pylori eradication.

Frequency and molecular characteristics of ciprofloxacin- and rifampicin-resistant Helicobacter pylori from gastric infections in the UK

Treatment failure with standard Helicobacter pylori eradication regimes may require the use of 'rescue' therapies containing fluoroquinolones or rifamycins. The susceptibilities of H. pylori in the UK to such antimicrobials are unknown; therefore, this study aimed to determine the frequencies and molecular markers of resistance. Ciprofloxacin and rifampicin susceptibilities were determined by Etest and/or disc diffusion for 255 isolates of H. pylori, including 171 isolates from adult dyspeptic patients with refractive infections. Mutations in known resistance-determining regions of gyrA and rpoB were determined. The ciprofloxacin resistance rate was 7.5 %, and gyrA mutations, predominantly at codon position 91, were identified in most resistant isolates. One isolate (<1 %) had an unequivocal rifampicin-resistant phenotype by Etest yet had no associated mutations in the rpoB gene. As resistance rates were low in H. pylori isolates, including those from patients with refractive infections, it was concluded that fluoroquinolones or rifamycins might be considered in the UK for inclusion in 'rescue' therapies.

Resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin and levofloxacin of Helicobacter pylori before and after clarithromycin-based therapy in Taiwan

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Clarithromycin-based triple therapy has been commonly applied as the first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Levofloxacin could serve as an alternative in either first-line or second-line regimens. This study surveyed the prevalence of levofloxacin resistance of H. pylori isolates in naive patients and in patients with a failed clarithromycin-based triple therapy.

METHODS

The study collected the H. pylori isolates from 180 naive patients and 47 patients with a failed clarithromycin-based triple therapy. Their in vitro antimicrobial resistance was determined by E-test.

RESULTS

The naive H. pylori isolates had resistance rates for amoxicillin, levofloxacin, clarithromycin and metronidazole of 0%, 9.4%, 10.6% and 26.7%, respectively. An evolutional increase of the primary levofloxacin resistance was observed in isolates collected after 2004, as compared to isolates collected before 2004 (16.3% vs 3.2%, P = 0.003). There was no evolutional increment of the primary clarithromycin resistance. The clarithromycin resistance elevated significantly after a failed clarithromycin-based triple therapy (78.7% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001). The post-treatment isolates remained to have a levofloxacin resistance rate of near 17%, but the levofloxacin-resistant isolates were correlated with a higher incidence of metronidazole resistance (P = 0.023). No strain was found to be resistant to amoxicillin even after eradication failure.

CONCLUSION

The levofloxacin resistance of naive H. pylori remains less than 10% in Taiwan. With relatively lower resistance to levofloxacin than to metronidazole of the H. pylori isolates collected after a failed clarithromycin-based therapy, proton pump inhibitor-levofloxacin-amoxicillin may be an alternative choice to serve as the second-line therapy.

Identification and molecular characterization of triple- and quadruple-resistant Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates in Germany

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of triple- and quadruple-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolated in Germany, to characterize those isolates molecular genetically and to identify risk factors for the development of multiresistance.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin and rifampicin in 1118 clinical isolates obtained between July 2006 and December 2007 was tested by the Etest method. For patients harbouring triple- or quadruple-resistant strains (n = 169), data on prior eradication therapies and underlying diseases were collected and evaluated. A select number of quadruple- and triple-resistant strains were examined for resistance-mediating mutations in their 23S rRNA, 16S rRNA, gyrA and rpoB genes, respectively.

RESULTS

From 1118 clinical isolates, 13.4% (n = 150) showed phenotypic resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin and quinolones and 0.9% (n = 10) to metronidazole, clarithromycin and rifampicin; one isolate exhibited resistance to clarithromycin, quinolones and rifampicin. In eight isolates (0.7%), we detected phenotypic quadruple resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, quinolones and rifampicin or tetracycline. Triple- and quadruple-resistant strains harboured resistance-associated mutations in their 23S rRNA, 16S rRNA, gyrA or rpoB genes and were nearly exclusively isolated from patients who had already been unsuccessfully treated on multiple occasions.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that more than 15% of H. pylori strains isolated from routine samples in the German National Reference Centre are resistant to three or more antimicrobials and identified prior unsuccessful eradication therapies as a key factor for the development of multiresistance. Our data emphasize the need for further comprehensive surveillance studies monitoring the role of treatment regimens in antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori.

Prevalence of primary fluoroquinolone resistance among clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori at a University Hospital in Southern Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolone-containing therapy is effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. However, the resistance rate of H. pylori to fluoroquinolones in Taiwan has not yet been reported. In this study, we aimed to investigate the susceptibility to antibiotics commonly used in eradication schedules and fluoroquinolones in H. pylori.

METHODS

A total of 210 clinical isolates of H. pylori were collected from April 1998 to September 2007 from patients in southern Taiwan. The in vitro activities of six antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar dilution method and Etest. The mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and gyrB were investigated by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Overall, 5.7% of the isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. The resistance rate to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and tetracycline was 1.0% (two of 210), 9.5% (20 of 210), 27.6% (58 of 210), and 0.5% (one of 210), respectively. The resistance rate to either ciprofloxacin or to levofloxacin increased from 2.8% (1998-2003) to 11.8% (2004-2007). The mutations in gyrA at N87 or D91 had an impact on primary fluoroquinolone resistance in H. pylori. Garenoxacin, but not moxifloxacin, had a good in vitro inhibitory effect against ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin-resistant strains compared with objective minimal inhibitory concentration values.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug resistance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in H. pylori collected from 2004 to 2007 increased significantly compared with resistance level observed during 1998-2003. The continuous surveillance of quinolone resistance among H. pylori is important in this area.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Antibiotic resistance has resulted in unsatisfactory eradication results with dual and now triple therapy in many countries. Newer antibiotics and changes in dosing and duration of therapy may overcome resistant strains but may only provide limited improvement in eradication rates. Sequential therapy with amoxicillin (1 g twice a day) and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (twice a day) given for 5 days followed by a PPI plus clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day) and tinidazole (500 mg twice a day) for 5 days is now a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori in some countries. Standard triple therapy is effective in regions where clarithromycin resistance is low. Levofloxacin based triple therapy is an effective alternative to quadruple therapy in second-line treatment. Adjuvant therapy may reduce side-effects and improve compliance. Molecular and genomic research on H. pylori may result in the development of targeted antibiotic therapy; however, more research is required in this field. Further research in vaccination is also necessary before this can become an option in clinical practice.

“Rescue” regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer disease, and gastric cancer. After more than 20 years of experience in H pylori treatment, in my opinion, the ideal regimen to treat this infection is still to be found. Currently, apart from having to know first-line eradication regimens well, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final (overall) eradication rate. The choice of a “rescue” treatment depends on which treatment is used initially. If a clarithromycin-based regimen was used initially, a subsequent metronidazole-based treatment (quadruple therapy) may be used afterwards, and then a levofloxacin-based combination would be a third “rescue” option. Alternatively, it has recently been suggested that levofloxacin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, with the advantage of efficacy, simplicity and safety. In this case, a quadruple regimen may be reserved as a third-line rescue option. Finally, rifabutin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging empirical fourth-line strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, and levofloxacin. Even after two consecutive failures, several studies have demonstrated that H pylori eradication can finally be achieved in almost all patients if several rescue therapies are consecutively given. Therefore, the attitude in H pylori eradication therapy failure, even after two or more unsuccessful attempts, should be to fight and not to surrender.

Comparison between H pylori eradication rates of two moxifloxacin-based triple therapies

AIM: To compare the H pylori eradication rates of two 7-day moxifloxacin-based therapies.

METHODS: In this parallel control study, 52 H pylori-positive patients were divided into EMT (esomeprazole 20 mg bid, moxifloxacin 0.4 g qd, tinidazole 0.5 g bid) group and RMA (ranitidine bismuth citrate capsules 0.4 g bid, moxifloxacin 0.4 g qd, amoxicillin 1.0 g bid) group. The patients in both groups were treated for 7 d. H pylori status was assessed 4 weeks after the end of treatment by ¹³C urea breath test.

RESULTS: The treatment was completed in all the 52 patients. The rates of H pylori eradication in group EMT and RMA were 83.3% and 79.4%, respectively, and there was no difference between them (χ² = 0.117, P = 0.521).

CONCLUSION: Seven-day moxifloxacin-based triple therapy is a feasible H pylori eradication regimen.

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: indications, efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infects up to half of the world's population. It remains the major cause of peptic ulcer disease and is recognised as a carcinogen for its role in gastric carcinogenesis. Successful eradication of the bacteria is associated with improved health outcomes including fewer dyspeptic symptoms, reduced peptic ulcer recurrence and rebleeding, reduced peptic ulcer risk with NSAIDs and as a cure for low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma. The risk of gastric cancer is reduced in those without premalignant mucosal abnormalities at the time of eradication.

OBJECTIVE

This review outlines the current indications and options for therapy of H. pylori with particular reference to drug-induced adverse events associated with treatment.

METHODS

The indications for H. pylori eradication are evidence-based and in accordance with recent consensus statements and recommendations. The eradication treatment is based on numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Eradication therapy, in general, is safe and well tolerated. Antibiotic therapy may be associated with significant drug adverse reactions, especially gastrointestinal symptoms.

Mutagenesis in the alpha3alpha4 GyrA helix and in the Toprim domain of GyrB refines the contribution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase to intrinsic resistance to quinolones

The replacement of M74 in GyrA, A83 in GyrA, and R447 in GyrB of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrase by their Escherichia coli homologs resulted in active enzymes as quinolone susceptible as the E. coli gyrase. This demonstrates that the primary structure of gyrase determines intrinsic quinolone resistance and was supported by a three-dimensional model of N-terminal GyrA.

Detection of the drug-resistant gene of Helicobacter pylori

Antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and the resistance rate are increased due to the wide use of antibiotics. At present, the detection of antibiotic-resistant H. pylori is focused on the clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance testing using PCR-based molecular biology techniques. However, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism and real-time PCR in combination with melting curve analysis techniques have a broad prospect in detecting drug-resistant clarithromycin. They can detect it from tissue biopsy and stool samples, and thus can be used in detecting the resistance of a wide range of antibiotics. Western blot and PCR- restriction fragment length polymorphism can also detect the resistance of metronidazole, and can therefore develop into the routine procedures for detecting drug-resistant H. pylori.

One-week once-daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin for eradication of persistent Helicobacter pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin

AIM

To investigate a 1-week once-daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin for rescue therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 103) with at least one previous treatment failure and H. pylori infection resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, and rifabutin 300 mg, given once daily for 7 days. Eradication was confirmed by histology and culture. CYP2C19 status was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 77.7% (68.4-85.3) and 83.3% (74.4-90.2). Five patients discontinued prematurely (4.8%). Eradication was achieved in 93.1% of poor/intermediate metabolizers and in 78.8% of homozygous extensive metabolizers (p = .14). Eradication rates in patients with one, two, three, and four or more previous failures were 78.3%, 89.6%, 68.6%, and 88.9%, respectively (p = .21). The regimen was effective in seven of nine patients who previously failed quadruple therapy. Post-treatment resistance to moxifloxacin and rifabutin was detected in two (12.5%) and five (31%) patients after treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin is a promising, safe, and convenient regimen for rescue therapy of H. pylori infection that may serve as a valuable alternative to quadruple therapy, particularly for patients with intolerance to amoxicillin.

Second-line rescue therapy with levofloxacin after H. pylori treatment failure: a Spanish multicenter study of 300 patients

AIM

Quadruple therapy is generally recommended as second-line therapy after Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. However, this regimen requires the administration of four drugs with a complex scheme, is associated with a relatively high incidence of adverse effects, and bismuth salts are not available worldwide anymore. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a triple second-line levofloxacin-based regimen in patients with H. pylori eradication failure.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter study.

PATIENTS

in whom a first treatment with proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin had failed.

INTERVENTION

A second eradication regimen with levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and omeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) was prescribed for 10 days.

OUTCOME

Eradication was confirmed with (13)C-urea breath test 4-8 wk after therapy. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interview and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Incidence of adverse effects was evaluated by means of a specific questionnaire.

RESULTS

Three hundred consecutive patients were included. Mean age was 48 yr, 47% were male, 38% had peptic ulcer, and 62% functional dyspepsia. Almost all (97%) patients took all the medications correctly. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 81% (95% CI 77-86%) and 77% (73-82%). Adverse effects were reported in 22% of the patients, mainly including nausea (8%), metallic taste (5%), abdominal pain (3%), and myalgias (3%); none of them were severe.

CONCLUSION

Ten-day levofloxacin-based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging second-line strategy, representing an alternative to quadruple therapy in patients with previous proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure, being simple and safe.

An alternative salvage regimen for Helicobacter pylori-resistant patients with heart failure

Helicobacter pylori infects over 50% of the worldwide population. For eradication, European, Canadian, and American guidelines recommend a regimen consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and metronidazole or amoxicillin dosed twice daily for at least 7 days. When this treatment strategy fails, a complex, multidosed bismuth-based quadruple regimen is recommended. Unfortunately, for patients with heart failure, this salvage regimen can be potentially hazardous due to the drug-drug interaction with tetracycline and digoxin, as well as the large salicylate content with bismuth subsalicylate. As H. pylori infection is so prevalent, providers will most likely encounter such a therapeutic dilemma. A safe, effective, and simplistic alternative is a 10-day fluoroquinolone-based regimen consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, levofloxacin and either clarithromycin or amoxicillin. Levofloxacin demonstrates excellent bioavailability, widespread tissue and fluid distribution, extended half-life, limited drug interaction profile, low incidence of side effects, and remarkable activity against H. pylori with minimal primary resistance. Compared to the 7-day quadruple regimen, a 10-day levofloxacin-based regimen demonstrated a greater eradication rate, better tolerability, and a lower rate of therapy discontinuation. We briefly provide a summary of the data regarding this levofloxacin-based regimen and two successful cases from our heart failure clinic.

Progress in research into the molecular mechanism of drug resistance of Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori is a pathogen of chronic and active gastritis. It is the main cause of chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease, and is directly related to diseases of the stomach and duodenum. This pathogen can also induce gastric carcinoma. With the extensive use of antibiotics, the number of drug resistant strains of H. pylori has rapidly increased. As a result, there are some difficulties in applying clinical therapy for diseases related to H. pylori. This paper aimed to first analyze the status and prevalence of antibiotic resistance, and then to review various drugs such as macrolides, imidazoles, tetracyclines, β-lactams and quinolones for systematically treating H. pylori infection. The mechanisms of various drug resistances, as well as detection and identification assays for typing drug resistance, are discussed. This paper presents accumulated clinical data and evidence for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of diseases related to H. pylori.

Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori

Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori is recommended in a number of clinical conditions. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology and cellular mechanisms that result in antimicrobial resistance, the results of current eradication therapies, and new approaches to the management of Helicobacter pylori infection.

First-line triple therapy with levofloxacin for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

At present, the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin regimen is relatively low.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a first-line triple clarithromycin-free regimen including ranitidine bismuth citrate, levofloxacin and amoxicillin.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

PATIENTS

Helicobacter pylori-positive patients complaining of dyspeptic symptoms referred for gastroscopy.

INTERVENTION

Levofloxacin (500 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.d.) and ranitidine bismuth citrate (400 mg b.d.) was prescribed for 10 days.

OUTCOME

Eradication was confirmed by a (13)C-urea breath test 8 weeks after therapy. Compliance with therapy was determined by questioning and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Incidence of adverse effects was evaluated by means of a specific questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included (30% peptic ulcer, 70% functional dyspepsia). Almost all (97%) patients took all the medications correctly. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 88.5% (95% CI =78-95%) and 84.4 (74-91%). Adverse effects were reported in 9.5% of the patients, mainly including diarrhoea (7.9%); none of them were severe.

CONCLUSION

This new 10-day levofloxacin-based combination represents an alternative to clarithromycin-based therapy, as it meets the criteria set for regimens used as primary H. pylori treatment: effectiveness (>80%), simplicity (twice-daily dosing and excellent compliance) and safety (low incidence of adverse effects).

Primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori strains isolated in northern and central Italy

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics is increasing worldwide, and it reduces the efficacy of therapy.

AIM

To assess current primary antibiotic resistance in H. pylori strains isolated in Italy.

METHODS

Between June 2004 and June 2006, H. pylori strains were isolated consecutively in the two participating centres (Bologna, northern Italy; Rome, central Italy) from patients never previously treated for the infection. Isolated strains were tested for primary clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin resistance using as break point the minimal inhibitory concentration >/=1, >/=8 and >/=1 mg/L for the three antibiotics, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 255 H. pylori strains were evaluated. The resistance rate was 16.9% for clarithromycin, 29.4% for metronidazole and 19.1% for levofloxacin. Clarithromycin resistance was significantly higher in non-ulcer dyspepsia than in peptic ulcer patients (19.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.02), metronidazole resistance was higher in foreign than Italian patients (50% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.0004) and levofloxacin resistance was higher in old than younger patients (28.4% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.048). Levofloxacin resistance was also more frequent in those strains with either clarithromycin or metronidazole resistance.

CONCLUSION

A very high rate of primary resistance towards the tested antibiotics was detected in our study.