Age-appropriate and acceptable paediatric dosage forms: Insights into end-user perceptions, preferences and practices from the Children's Acceptability of Oral Formulations (CALF) Study

Stability and compatibility of Basmisanil granules co-administered with soft food

Co-administration of solid oral dosage forms with soft food or beverages is commonly used to facilitate administration and to improve compliance in the paediatric and geriatric population and in patient groups with swallowing difficulties. The present case study was conducted to investigate the compatibility, stability and dissolution of Basmisanil administered as granules mixed with different soft food matrices. The data were generated to justify dosing instructions, according which Basmisanil should be sprinkled on or mixed with one tablespoon of soft food to aid swallowing. Different soft food types were selected to cover a broad range of various food components (e.g. fat, protein, carbohydrates, fiber and water) and pH. Active content and degradation products of the active substance were determined after mixing the granules with the semisolid food matrix and after two hours of storage under ambient conditions, respectively. In-vitro dissolution tests of granule/food mixtures were also conducted. Furthermore, the stability of the API polymorph was evaluated. Basmisanil shows good chemical stability when the granules are mixed with soft food and consumed within two hours. No polymorphic conversion (anhydrate to monohydrate) could be detected in the granule/food mixtures after preparation and after storage up to 24 h. The in-vitro dissolution of the API from the granules was not adversely affected by the presence of the food matrix. All results were comparable regardless of the tested food matrix. The results do not prohibit the administration of the granules with soft food to the patient.

Requests for new oral antibiotic prescriptions in children within 2 days: a Norwegian population-based study

BACKGROUND

Children commonly refuse to take antibiotics, which may induce parents to request new antibiotic prescriptions with different pharmaceutical characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate prescription changes for children 0-12 years receiving oral liquid or solid antibiotic formulations and to explore the relationships between prescription changes and characteristics related to the child, prescriber and antibiotic.

METHODS

A population-based registry study based on data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) from 2004 to 2016. Antibiotic prescription changes were defined as the dispensing of subsequent antibiotics with different pharmaceutical characteristics to the same child within 2 days after initial prescriptions. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression and generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Requests for new prescriptions followed 3.0% of 2 691 483 initial antibiotic prescriptions for children. Young children who received solid formulations (10.9%) and certain poor-tasting antibiotics (8.6%) had the highest proportions of new prescriptions. Penicillin V was most commonly changed, while macrolides/lincosamides dominated subsequent prescriptions. In order of magnitude, the characteristics associated with requests for new prescriptions were the children's ages, poor taste and concentration of liquids, size and shape of solids, prescribers born in recent decades, and girl patients. Reimbursed prescriptions and scored solids were associated with fewer requests.

CONCLUSIONS

While only 3% of the antibiotic prescriptions were changed, the preference of broad-spectrum over narrow-spectrum antibiotics for young children in this study mirrors international prescription patterns. Avoiding the costs of children's refusal and consequent changes may thus be a motivation for choosing more preferred antibiotics.

Age-Appropriate Pediatric Dosage Forms in Japan: Insights into End-User Perceptions From an Observational Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing the Acceptability of Oral Formulation

BACKGROUND

The lack of appropriate pediatric formulations is a global issue and information on acceptability is urgently needed to develop standard pediatric formulations. This study aimed to assess perceptions of acceptability of several oral dosage forms among pediatric patients at a community and a pediatric hospital in Japan and collected information about age-appropriate pediatric formulations, aiming to contribute to drug development promotion worldwide.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was performed. A convenience sample of caregivers was recruited from available chain-owned retail pharmacies and inpatient pediatric units. The questionnaire was composed of 3 parts: (1) acceptability of the 5 dosage forms (tablets, capsules, powders, liquids, and orally disintegrating tablet) by age; (2) acceptability of dosage size, amount, and volume by age; and (3) the actual method of administration. Face-to-face interviews were conducted at 3 independent community pharmacies (324 parents) and tertiary care pediatric hospital wards (112 nursing staff). Acceptability scores and acceptable dosages were then determined. The survey was conducted from October 1 to December 1, 2017, for the hospital setting and November 1 to 30, 2017, for the outpatient setting.

RESULTS

The acceptability of oral dosage forms was roughly similar to the matrix drafted by the European Medical Agency. Differences in perception of the powder forms between communities and hospitals were also observed, with the nursing staff perceiving powder as being acceptable from the neonatal period.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in caregivers' perception of the acceptability of oral formulations between Japan and Europe was small. The powder form was found to be more acceptable in Japan. Further intervention studies are needed to assess the preferred pediatric formulation worldwide.

Oral medicine acceptance in infants and toddlers: measurement properties of the caregiver-administered Children's acceptance tool (CareCAT)

BACKGROUND

Developing age-appropriate medications remains a challenge in particular for the population of infants and toddlers, as they are not able to reliably self-report if they would accept and consequently take an oral medicine. Therefore, it is common to use caregivers as proxies when assessing medicine acceptance. The outcome measures used in this research field differ and most importantly lack validation, implying a persisting gap in knowledge and controversy in the field. The newly developed Caregiver-administered Children's Acceptance Tool (CareCAT) is based on a 5-point nominal scale, with descriptors of medication acceptance behavior. This cross-sectional study assessed the measurement properties of the tool with regards to the user's understanding and its intra- and inter-rater reliability.

METHODS

Participating caregivers were enrolled at a primary healthcare facility where their children (median age 6 months) had been prescribed oral antibiotics. Caregivers, trained observers and the tool developer observed and scored on the CareCAT tool what behavior children exhibited when receiving the medicine (n = 104). The video-records of this process served as replicate observations (n = 69). After using the tool caregivers were asked to explain their observations and the tool descriptors in their own words. The tool's reliability was assessed by percentage agreement and Cohen's unweighted kappa coefficients of agreement for nominal scales.

RESULTS

The study found that caregivers using CareCAT had a satisfactory understanding of the tool's descriptors. Using its dichotomized scores the tool reliably was strong for acceptance behavior (agreement inter-rater 84-88%, kappa 0.66-0.76; intra-rater 87-89%, kappa 0.68-0.72) and completeness of medicine ingestion (agreement inter-rater 82-86%, kappa 0.59-0.67; intra-rater 85-93%, kappa 0.50-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

The CareCAT is a low-cost, easy-to-use and reliable instrument, which is relevant to assess acceptance behavior and completeness of medicine ingestion, both of which are of significant importance for developing age-appropriate medications in infants and toddlers.

Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis: Preclinical Study of Pharmacokinetics after Sublingual Administration of Taste-Masked Tablets for Potential Pediatric Use

Epinephrine is a life-saving treatment in anaphylaxis. In community settings, a first-aid dose of epinephrine is injected from an auto-injector (EAI). Needle phobia highly contributes to EAI underuse, leading to fatalities—especially in children. A novel rapidly-disintegrating sublingual tablet (RDST) of epinephrine was developed in our laboratory as a potential alternative dosage form. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sublingual bioavailability of epinephrine 30 mg as a potential pediatric dose incorporated in our novel taste-masked RDST in comparison with intramuscular (IM) epinephrine 0.15 mg from EAI, the recommended and only available dosage form for children in community settings. We studied the rate and extent of epinephrine absorption in our validated rabbit model (n = 5) using a cross-over design. The positive control was IM epinephrine 0.15 mg from an EpiPen Jr^®. The negative control was a placebo RDST. Tablets were placed under the tongue for 2 min. Blood samples were collected at frequent intervals and epinephrine concentrations were measured using HPLC with electrochemical detection. The mean ± SEM maximum plasma concentration (C_max) of 16.7 ± 1.9 ng/mL at peak time (T_max) of 21 min after sublingual epinephrine 30 mg did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) from the C_max of 18.8 ± 1.9 ng/mL at a T_max of 36 min after IM epinephrine 0.15 mg. The C_max of both doses was significantly higher than the C_max of 7.5 ± 1.7 ng/mL of endogenous epinephrine after placebo. These taste-masked RDSTs containing a 30 mg dose of epinephrine have the potential to be used as an easy-to-carry, palatable, non-invasive treatment for anaphylactic episodes for children in community settings.