Multi-institutional review of repeat irradiation of chest wall and breast for recurrent breast cancer

DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer VI: therapy of locoregional breast cancer recurrences

Objective

To update the practical guidelines for radiotherapy of patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrences based on the current German interdisciplinary S3 guidelines 2012.

Methods

A comprehensive survey of the literature using the search phrases “locoregional breast cancer recurrence”, “chest wall recurrence”, “local recurrence”, “regional recurrence”, and “breast cancer” was performed, using the limits “clinical trials”, “randomized trials”, “meta-analysis”, “systematic review”, and “guidelines”.

Conclusions

Patients with isolated in-breast or regional breast cancer recurrences should be treated with curative intent. Mastectomy is the standard of care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. In a subset of patients, a second breast conservation followed by partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an appropriate alternative to mastectomy. If a second breast conservation is performed, additional irradiation should be mandatory. The largest reirradiation experience base exists for multicatheter brachytherapy; however, prospective clinical trials are needed to clearly define selection criteria, long-term local control, and toxicity.

Following primary mastectomy, patients with resectable locoregional breast cancer recurrences should receive multimodality therapy including systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation +/− hyperthermia. This approach results in high local control rates and long-term survival is achieved in a subset of patients. In radiation-naive patients with unresectable locoregional recurrences, radiation therapy is mandatory. In previously irradiated patients with a high risk of a second local recurrence after surgical resection or in patients with unresectable recurrences, reirradiation should be strongly considered. Indication and dose concepts depend on the time interval to first radiotherapy, presence of late radiation effects, and concurrent or sequential systemic treatment. Combination with hyperthermia can further improve tumor control.

In patients with isolated axillary or supraclavicular recurrence, durable disease control is best achieved with multimodality therapy including surgery and radiotherapy. Radiation therapy significantly improves local control and should be applied whenever feasible.

Rib fractures after reirradiation plus hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer: Predictive factors

Background

Combining reirradiation (reRT) and hyperthermia (HT) has shown high therapeutic value for patients with locoregional recurrent breast cancer (LR). However, additional toxicity of reirradiation (e.g., rib fractures) may occur. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of potential risk factors on the occurrence of rib fractures.

Patients and methods

From 1982–2005, 234 patients were treated with adjuvant reRT + HT after surgery for LR. ReRT consisted typically of 8 fractions of  4 Gy twice a week, or 12 fractions of  3 Gy four times a week. A total of 118 patients were irradiated with abutted photon and electron fields. In all, 60 patients were irradiated using either one or alternating combinations of abutted AP electron fields. Hyperthermia was given once or twice a week.

Results

The 5-year infield local control (LC) rate was 70 %. Rib fractures were detected in 16 of 234 patients (actuarial risk: 7 % at 5 years). All rib fractures occurred in patients treated with a combination of photon and abutted electron fields (p = 0.000); in 15 of 16 patients fractures were located in the abutment regions. The other significant predictive factors for rib fractures were a higher fraction dose (p = 0.040), large RT fields, and treatment before the year 2000.

Discussion and conclusion

ReRT + HT results in long-term LC. The majority of rib fractures were located in the photon/electron abutment area, emphasizing the disadvantage of field overlap. Large abutted photon/electron fields combined with 4 Gy fractions increase the number of rib fractures in this study group. However, as these factors were highly correlated no relative importance of the individual factors could be estimated. Increasing the number of HT sessions a week does not increase the risk of rib fractures.

Hyperthermia and Radiation Therapy in Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcome of hyperthermia (HT) and radiation therapy (RT) in locally recurrent breast cancers (LRBCs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 708 abstracts were screened from 8 databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. Single-arm and 2-arm studies, treating LRBCs with HT and RT but without surgery (for local recurrence) or concurrent chemotherapy were considered. The evaluated endpoint was complete response (CR).

RESULTS

Thirty-one full text articles, pertaining to 34 studies, were shortlisted for the meta-analysis. Eight were 2-arm (randomized, n=5; nonrandomized, n=3), whereas 26 were single-arm studies. In all, 627 patients were enrolled in 2-arm and 1483 in single-arm studies. Patients were treated with a median of 7 HT sessions, and an average temperature of 42.5°C was attained. Mean RT dose was 38.2 Gy (range, 26-60 Gy). Hyperthermia was most frequently applied after RT. In the 2-arm studies, a CR of 60.2% was achieved with RT + HT versus 38.1% with RT alone (odds ratio 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-4.18, P<.0001). Risk ratio and risk difference were 1.57 (95% CI 1.25-1.96, P<.0001) and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11-0.33, P<.0001), respectively. In 26 single-arm studies, RT + HT attained a CR of 63.4% (event rate 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.66). Moreover, 779 patients had been previously irradiated (696 from single-arm and 83 from 2-arm studies). A CR of 66.6% (event rate 0.64, 95% CI 0.58-0.70) was achieved with HT and reirradiation (mean ± SD dose: 36.7 ± 7.7 Gy). Mean acute and late grade 3/4 toxicities with RT + HT were 14.4% and 5.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermoradiation therapy enhances the likelihood of CR rates in LRBCs over RT alone by 22% with minimal acute and late morbidities. For even those previously irradiated, reirradiation with HT provides locoregional control in two-thirds of the patients. Thermoradiation therapy could therefore be considered as an effective and safe palliative treatment option for LRBCs.

Reirradiation and hyperthermia for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area: Size matters

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Treatment options for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area are limited. Hyperthermia, elevating tumor temperature to 40-45°C, sensitizes radio-and-chemotherapy. Four hundred and fourteen patients treated with reirradiation+hyperthermia (reRT+HT) in the AMC(n=301) and the BVI(n=113), from 1982 to 2005 were retrospectively analyzed for treatment response, locoregional control (LC) and prognostic factors for LC and toxicity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

All patients received previous irradiation (median 50 Gy). reRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy-2/week (AMC) or 12 × 3 Gy-4/week (BVI). Hyperthermia was added once (AMC)/twice (BVI) a week.

RESULTS

Overall clinical response rate was 86%. The 3-year LC rate was 25%. The number of recurrence episodes, distant metastases (DM), tumor site, tumor size, time to recurrence and treatment year were significant for LC. Acute ⩾ grade 3 toxicity occurred in 24% of patients. Actuarial late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity was 23% at 3-years. In multivariable analysis reRT fraction dose was significantly related to late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

reRT+HT is an effective curative and palliative treatment option for patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area. Early referral, treatment of chest wall recurrences ⩽ 5 cm in the absence of distant metastases, provided the highest local control rates. The cumulative effects of past and present treatments should be accounted for by adjusting treatment protocol to minimize toxicity.

Current Treatment of Isolated Locoregional Breast Cancer Recurrences

Patients with isolated locoregional breast cancer recurrences should be treated with curative intent. Mastectomy is regarded as the standard of care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. In a selected group of patients, partial breast irradiation after second breast-conserving surgery is a viable alternative to mastectomy. If a second breast conservation is performed, additional irradiation should be mandatory, especially in patients who had not been irradiated previously. In case of re-irradiation, the largest experience exists for multi-catheter brachytherapy. Prospective clinical trials are needed to clearly define selection criteria, long-term local control, and toxicity. In patients with resectable locoregional breast cancer recurrences after mastectomy, multi-modal therapy comprising complete resection, radiation therapy in previously unirradiated patients, and systemic therapy results in 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates of 69% and 88%, respectively. In radiation-naive patients with unresectable, isolated locoregional recurrences, radiation therapy is mandatory. In selected patients with previous irradiations and unresectable locoregional recurrences, a second irradiation as part of an individual treatment concept can be applied. The increased risk of severe toxicity should always be weighed up against the potential clinical benefit. A combination therapy with hyperthermia can further improve the treatment results.

Hyperthermia Is Now Included in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer Recurrences: An Analysis of Existing Data

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermia has been included in the 2013 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines as an option for the treatment of breast recurrences. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the important role of hyperthermia as a therapeutic modality by presenting clinical trials on this subject carried out in the last decades.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All relevant trials published since 1987 were retrieved from Medline and reviewed.

RESULTS

Results show that the addition of hyperthermia to radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer enhances treatment response and can increase local control.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are required to evaluate potential benefits of hyperthermia in the treatment of other kinds of superficial tumors.

Local control rate after the combination of re-irradiation and hyperthermia for irresectable recurrent breast cancer: Results in 248 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Randomized studies have shown that adding hyperthermia (HT) to re-irradiation (re-RT) improves treatment outcome for patients with breast cancer recurrences. We evaluated the efficacy and side effects in patients treated with re-RT and HT for irresectable locoregional breast cancer recurrences.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From September 1996 to December 2011, 248 patients with a macroscopic breast cancer recurrence were treated with re-RT and HT. Radiotherapy (RT) was applied to a dose of 32 Gy in 4 Gy fractions, twice weekly. HT was prescribed once weekly after RT. Primary endpoints for this analysis were complete response (CR) and local control (LC). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related characteristics predictive for the endpoints were identified in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 32 months. The CR rate was 70%. At 1, 3, and 5 years LC was 53%, 40% and 39%, and OS was 66%, 32%, and 18%, respectively. OS after 10 years was 10%. Thermal burns developed in 23% patients, healing with conservative measures. The incidence of 5 years late grade 3 toxicity was 1%. A few patients survived more than 10 years without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of re-RT and HT results in a high rate of long-term LC with acceptable late toxicity, and many patients remained locally controlled for the rest of their survival period.

The place of extensive surgery in locoregional recurrence and limited metastatic disease of breast cancer: preliminary results

The aims of this study were first to clearly define two different entities: locoregional recurrences and limited metastatic disease and secondly to evaluate the place of extensive surgery in these two types of recurrence. Material and Methods. Twenty-four patients were followed from June 2004 until May 2014. All patients underwent surgery but for 1 patient this surgery was stopped because the tumour was unresectable. Results. The median interval between surgery for the primary tumour and the locoregional recurrence or metastatic evolution was 129 months. Eight patients had pure nodal recurrences, 4 had nodal and muscular recurrences, 5 had muscular + skin recurrences, and 8 had metastatic evolution. Currently, all patients are still alive but 2 have liver metastases. Disease free survival was measured at 2 years and extrapolated at 5 years and was 92% at these two time points. No difference was observed for young or older women; limited metastatic evolution and locoregional recurrence exhibited the same disease free survival. Conclusion. Extensive surgery has a place in locoregional and limited metastatic breast cancer recurrences but this option must absolutely be integrated in the multidisciplinary strategy of therapeutic options and needs to be planned with a curative intent.

Socioeconomic and racial disparities in the selection of chest wall boost radiation therapy in californian women after mastectomy

To better elucidate the socioeconomic and racial differences in women who received postmastectomy radiation therapy with or without a chest wall boost, the records from 4747 women included in the California Cancer Registry were reviewed. Poor and Hispanic women were more likely to receive a chest wall boost than were more affluent and non-Hispanic women.

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare disparities in breast cancer treatment have been well documented. We investigated the socioeconomic status (SES) and racial factors in women with locally advanced breast cancer from the California Cancer Registry who had received postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with or without a chest wall boost (CWB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 4747 women with invasive breast cancer, diagnosed from 2005 to 2009, who had undergone PMRT, were reviewed and stratified by treatment with (n = 2686 [57%]) or without (n = 2061 [43%]) a CWB. Various patient demographic and biologic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Receipt of a CWB was associated with race/ethnicity (P < .001), SES (P < .001), tumor size (P = .038), tumor grade (P = .033), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status (P = .015), American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (P = .001), number of nodes examined (P = .001), and number of positive nodes (P = .037) on univariate analysis. After controlling for confounding factors, race/ethnicity and SES remained independently predictive of a CWB. Hispanic women were more likely to receive a CWB than Asian (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90), black (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.83), or white (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) women. Also, women of low SES were more likely to receive a CWB than women of high SES (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86).

CONCLUSION

We found that poor and Hispanic women were more commonly treated with a CWB than were more affluent and non-Hispanic women with a similar cancer stage, cancer biology, and treatment paradigm.

Bleomycin electrochemotherapy in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients: clinical outcome and management considerations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of electrochemotherapy (ECT) in elderly metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 55 patients with superficial metastases who underwent ECT according to the European Standard Operative Procedures of electrochemotherapy. Treatment schedule consisted of intravenous or intratumoral bleomycin followed by locally delivered electric pulses. Statistical comparisons were performed between two groups: the patients aged <70 years (n = 27) and those ≥70 years (n = 28). Treatment outcomes were as follows: complete response (CR) rate, local progression-free survival (LPFS), new lesions-free survival (NLFS), toxicity and patient compliance.

RESULTS

Patient groups were comparable for clinical-pathological features, except for the number of comorbidities (P < .001). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 6-53). Overall, CR rate was 40 % and was significantly higher in elderly patients (57 vs. 26 %, P = .023) and in patients with better performance status (PS = 0-1, 53 vs. PS = 2, 21 %, P = .048), although local tumor control showed a trend for lower values (2-year LPFS, 67 vs. 93 % among elderly and young patients, respectively; P = .061). Older women seemed less likely to progress outside the ECT field (2-year NLFS, 39 vs. 30 %, P = .075), but discontinued treatment more frequently due to impaired performance status (P = .002). Local pain was graded ≥3, according to a 10-point visual analog scale, by 16/28 (57.1 %) and 8/28 (28.6 %) elderly patients at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Wound debridement was required in 5/28 (18 %) older women, due to G3 skin ulceration.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly BC patients are highly responsive to ECT and achieve durable local tumor control. Physicians should be aware of possible debilitating side effects, such as pain and skin toxicity. Performance status and frailty screening could be a helpful addition to improve patient selection.

Local treatment options for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence

PURPOSE

In case of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR), radical mastectomy represents the treatment option frequently proposed. A second conservative treatment (2ndCT) has been proposed using either lumpectomy alone or associated with a re-irradiation of the tumor bed. However, in both clinical situations, the proof level of such therapeutic approaches remains low, based on cased-series or retrospective studies (level C).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In order to assess the different strategies of local treatment proposed in case of IBTR, a PubMed literature review was performed using the following keywords: breast cancer, ipsilateral recurrence, mastectomy, radiation therapy, brachytherapy. Four different salvage options were analyzed: (a) salvage mastectomy alone; (b) salvage mastectomy with postoperative re-irradiation; (c) 2ndCT with surgery alone; (d) 2ndCT with re-irradiation.

RESULTS

The rate of second local recurrence is about 10% [3-32%], about 25% [7-36%] and about 10% [2-26%], after salvage mastectomy, salvage lumpectomy alone or combined with a re-irradiation of the tumor bed respectively. However, the 5-year overall survival rates after salvage mastectomy and 2ndCT seem to be equivalent (≈75%) mainly influenced by distant metastatic progression.

CONCLUSION

In terms of Evidence Based Medicine, different options can be discussed such as Phase III or II randomized trials comparing salvage mastectomy versus 2ndCT, retrospective studies based on a matched-pair analysis or observatory studies. Those study designs need to be carefully analyzed to be able to propose new treatment options for women who experience an IBCR.

Radiation therapy for locally recurrent breast cancer

Approximately one-third of all breast cancer patients experience local recurrence of their tumor after initial treatment. As initial treatment often employs the use of radiation therapy (RT), the standard of care for local breast cancer recurrence after initial breast conserving therapy has traditionally been surgical intervention with mastectomy. However, recent attempts to preserve the intact breast after recurrence with local excision have revealed a potential need for RT in addition to repeat breast conserving surgery as rates of local failure with resection alone remain high. Additionally, local recurrence following initial mastectomy and chest wall RT can be treated with reirradiation to increase local control. Repeating RT, however, in a previously irradiated area, is a complex treatment strategy, as the clinician must carefully balance maximizing treatment effectiveness while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. As a result, physicians have been hesitant to treat recurrent disease with repeat RT with limited data. Results from the current literature are promising and current clinical trials are underway to explore reirradiation modalities which will provide additional information on treatment-related toxicity and outcomes. This paper will review the current literature on repeat radiation therapy for locally recurrent breast cancer.

The activity and safety of electrochemotherapy in persistent chest wall recurrence from breast cancer after mastectomy: a phase-II study

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) represents an attractive locoregional therapy for unresectable chest wall recurrence (CWR) from breast cancer. Thirty-five patients with cutaneous CWR after mastectomy who experienced progression despite re-irradiation and extensive systemic treatments were administered bleomycin-based ECT. Local response, toxicity, and superficial control were evaluated. Out of 516 metastases (median 15/patient, range 1-50), response was assessed on 196 target lesions (median size 20 mm, range 10-220). Patients received a median of 2 ECT courses (range 1-3). Two-month objective response was as follows: 54.3 % complete (19/35 patients), 37.1 % partial (13/35), and 8.6 % no change (3/35). Twenty-three patients (65.7 %) developed new lesions (NL) after a median time of 6.6 months (range 2.3-29.5), therefore 1, 2, or 3 ECT cycles were required in 14, 15, and 6 patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 6-53) and the 3-year local control rate was 81 %. Related morbidity was mild, increased after retreatments and consisted primarily of pain (reported as "moderate"/"severe" by 6, 13, and 17 % of patients 1 month after the first, second, and third application, respectively) and dermatological toxicity (acute G3 skin ulceration in 14, 20, and 33 % of patients, respectively). Less than 10 metastases (P < 0.001), the narrower area of tumor spread on the chest wall (P = 0.022), complete response achievement (P = 0.019), and post-ECT endocrine instead of chemotherapy (P = 0.025) were associated to NL-free survival. Only fewer skin metastases, hazard ratio (HR) 0.122, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.037-0.397, P < 0.001, and contained superficial spread, HR 0.234, 95 % CI 0.067-0.818, P = 0.023, were predictors for longer NL-free survival. ECT showed a satisfactory activity in refractory breast cancer CWR, providing sustained local control. Patients with fewer and less scattered skin metastases are less likely to develop NL. Partial responders and NL can be handled with additional ECT albeit increasing local pain and skin toxicity.

Lessons learned from an unusual case of inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare breast malignancy that is associated with poor long-term outcomes despite aggressive surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions. We recently treated a 56-year-old woman with right-sided IBC and biopsy-proven cutaneous metastases to her back and left breast. She underwent chemotherapy, bilateral modified radical mastectomy, and radiation therapy. One year after diagnosis, she is currently disease-free based on positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging and repeat skin biopsies. To provide insight into the management of IBC, we present this interesting case with a reflection on important lessons to be learned.

Re-surgery and chest wall re-irradiation for recurrent breast cancer: a second curative approach

Background

Repeat radiation is a rarely used treatment strategy that must be performed with caution. The efficacy and toxicity of a second curative radiotherapy series was investigated in cases of recurrent breast cancer.

Methods

Forty-two patients treated from 1993 to 2003 with resection (n = 30) and postoperative re-irradiation or definitive re-irradiation (n = 12) for recurrent breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Concurrent hyperthermia was performed in 29 patients. The median age was 57 years. The median pre-radiation exposure was 54Gy. Re-irradiation was conventionally fractionated to a median total dose of 60Gy.

Results

After a median follow-up of 41 months (range 3-92 months) higher graded late toxicity > G3 according to CTC 3.0 and LENT-SOMA was not observed. The estimated 5-year local control rate reached 62%. The estimated 5-year overall survival rate was 59%. Significantly inferior survival was associated with recurrence within two years (40 vs. 71%, p < ([0-9]).01) and presence of macroscopic tumour load (24 vs. 75%, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Repeat radiotherapy for recurrent breast cancer with total radiation doses of 60 Gy and the addition of hyperthermia in the majority of patients was feasible, with acceptable late morbidity and improved prognosis, particularly in patients with previous resection of recurrent tumours.

Reirradiation as a component of the multidisciplinary management of locally recurrent breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Our intent was to review a modern multidisciplinary institutional experience involving reirradiation of the breast, chest wall, and lymphatics for locoregional recurrences of breast cancer and report toxicity and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2009, 12 locoregional recurrences were reirradiated in 8 patients. The mean dose of initial radiotherapy was 57.1 Gy (range, 50.4-60.6 Gy), and the mean dose of reirradiation was 46.7 Gy (range, 30-62.1 Gy). The second course of radiotherapy was delivered using daily radiotherapy to 5 recurrences, twice-daily radiotherapy to 5 recurrences (1 with mold brachytherapy boost), and a combination of once- and twice-daily radiotherapy to 2 recurrences.

RESULTS

The median follow-up from time of completion of reirradiation was 30 months (range, 1.5-67 months). Local control was achieved in 7 of 8 patients and 11 of 12 recurrences. Regional control was achieved in 5 of 8 patients and 6 of 12 recurrences. Distant control was achieved in 5 of 8 patients. At time of analysis, 5 of 8 patients were alive. Median survival since reirradiation completion was 36 months (range, 4.5-47 months). Acute toxicity included grade 2 dermatitis in 4 patients, ipsilateral shoulder pain in 1 patient, and ipsilateral pleurisy in 1 patient. Late skin and soft tissue toxicity manifested as fibrosis in 4 patients, hyperpigmentation in 3 patients, and telangiectasia in 3 patients. Three patients reported lymphedema, 1 patient reporting chest wall pain and 1 patient with an ipsilateral rib fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary management of locoregional recurrence of breast cancer using reirradiation is well tolerated as salvage treatment and provides durable locoregional control.

Workshop report: A practical approach and general principles of re-irradiation for in-field cancer recurrence

In-field cancer recurrence after previous adjuvant or radical radiotherapy presents particularly challenging clinical issues to the oncologists. A Canadian pattern of practice survey showed a wide range of approaches in treatment intent, planning and dose fractionation. A workshop on re-irradiation was conducted at the 2009 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology annual scientific meeting, under the guidance of the Symptom Control Committee, in an effort to promote a uniform approach among radiation oncologists in their approach to re-irradiation. The workshop has made various recommendations in an effort to bring consistency among radiation oncologists across Canada to their approach towards re-irradiation.

Present and future technology for simultaneous superficial thermoradiotherapy of breast cancer

This paper reviews systems and techniques to deliver simultaneous thermoradiotherapy of breast cancer. It first covers the clinical implementation of simultaneous delivery of superficial (microwave or ultrasound) hyperthermia and external photon beam radiotherapy, first using a Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit and later medical linear accelerators. The parallel development and related studies of the Scanning Ultrasound Reflector Linear Arrays System (SURLAS), an advanced system specifically designed and developed for simultaneous thermoradiotherapy, follows. The performance characteristics of the SURLAS are reviewed and power limitation problems at high acoustic frequencies (>3 MHz) are discussed along with potential solutions. Next, the feasibility of simultaneous SURLAS hyperthermia and intensity modulated radiation therapy/image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT/IGRT) is established based on published and newly presented studies. Finally, based on the encouraging clinical results thus far, it is concluded that new trials employing the latest technologies are warranted along with further developments in treatment planning.

Durable palliation of breast cancer chest wall recurrence with radiation therapy, hyperthermia, and chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chest wall recurrences of breast cancer are a therapeutic challenge and durable local control is difficult to achieve. Our objective was to determine the local progression free survival (LPFS) and toxicity of thermochemoradiotherapy (ThChRT) for chest wall recurrence.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients received ThChRT for chest wall failure from 2/1995 to 6/2007 and make up this retrospective series. All received concurrent superficial hyperthermia twice weekly (median 8 sessions), chemotherapy (capecitabine in 21, vinorelbine in 2, and paclitaxel in 4), and radiation (median 45 Gy). Patients were followed up every 1.5-3 months and responses were graded with RECIST criteria and toxicities with the NCI CTC v4.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (85%) patients were previously irradiated (median 60.4 Gy) and 22 (81%) patients received prior chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 11 months. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 16/20 (80%) of patients with follow-up data, and 1 year LPFS was 76%. Overall survival was 23 months for patients with CR, and 5.4 months in patients achieving a partial response (PR) (p=0.01). Twenty-two patients experienced acute grade 1/2 treatment related toxicities, primarily moist desquamation. Two patients experienced 3rd degree burns; all resolved with conservative measures.

CONCLUSIONS

ThChRT offers durable palliation and prolonged LPFS with tolerable acute toxicity, especially if CR is achieved.

Management of locoregional recurrence of breast cancer

The locoregional recurrence of breast cancer is not a sign of distant metastases, and a substantial proportion of cases are cured by salvage therapy. Patients with locoregional recurrence should not be treated with palliative intent as if they have visceral metastases. The recommended treatment for ipsilateral breast recurrence after breast conservative therapy is a mastectomy. For patients who suffer from isolated chest wall recurrence after mastectomy, a surgical approach is recommended. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered for patients with unresectable disease in order to render the disease resectable. For patients with isolated chest wall recurrence who have received no prior radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy involving the chest wall and regional lymph nodes is recommended. Patients with isolated axillary lymph node recurrence should be treated with axillary dissection or resection. Although the effectiveness of systemic therapy for patients with locoregional recurrence is unclear, there is a trend toward treating patients with supraclavicular lymph node recurrence with radiotherapy plus systemic therapy. Pain relief and the eradication of other distressing symptoms resulting from inoperable disease are achieved in two-thirds to three-quarters of patients by radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. New anti-cancer agents and molecular target therapies should be evaluated with the objective of improving the treatment outcome of patients with locoregional recurrence. A combination of approaches is required for treatment of patients with locoregional recurrence, and a multidisciplinary tumor board should be organized at each institute.

Elective re-irradiation and hyperthermia following resection of persistent locoregional recurrent breast cancer: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

To analyse the therapeutic effect and toxicity of re-irradiation (re-RT) combined with hyperthermia (HT) following resection or clinically complete remission (CR) of persistent locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1988 and 2001, 78 patients with high risk recurrent breast cancer underwent elective re-RT and HT. All patients received extensive previous treatments, including surgery and high-dose irradiation (> or =50Gy). Most had received one or more lines of systemic therapy; 44% had been treated for > or = one previous locoregional recurrences. At start of re-RT + HT there was no macroscopically detectable tumour following surgery (96%) or chemotherapy (CT). Re-RT typically consisted of eight fractions of 4Gy, given twice weekly. Hyperthermia was added once a week.

RESULTS

After a median follow up of 64.2 months, three-year survival was 66%. Three- and five-year local control rates were 78% and 65%. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 32% of patients. The risk of late > or = grade 3 toxicity was 40% after three years. Time interval to the current recurrence was found to be most predictive for local control in univariate and multivariate analysis. The extensiveness of current surgery was the most relevant treatment related factor associated with toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients experiencing local recurrence in a previously radiated area, re-irradiation plus hyperthermia following minimisation of tumour burden leads to a high rate of local control, albeit with significant toxicity. The latter might be reduced by a more fractionated re-RT schedule.