Effects of ramipril on left ventricular mass and function in cardiovascular patients with controlled blood pressure and with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

An update on renovascular hypertension

Renovascular hypertension (RVH) represents a secondary and potentially remediable form of hypertension. Elevated blood pressure is only one of a broad array of pathophysiologic consequences that are associated with decreased renal perfusion. Our ability to accurately and noninvasively detect stenotic lesions within the renal artery is growing. However, functional assessment of renal parenchyma and hemodynamic significance of renal artery lesions is still limited. Advances in endovascular techniques spurred interest in the concept of ischemic nephropathy and the effect of renal artery revascularization on renal function. Despite the relative frequency of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), there currently is no consensus on the most appropriate therapy. In this article, we focus on the two most common causes of RVH, ARAS and fibromuscular dysplasia. We discuss the therapeutic strategies, disease mechanisms, clinical findings, evolving trends, and developments.

Bisoprolol Improves Echocardiographic Parameters of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients with Systemic Hypertension

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVD) is a common complication secondary to hypertension. It has been reported that bisoprolol is effective in reducing blood pressure and has beneficial cardiac effects in patients with hypertension. However, its effect on LV diastolic function has not been studied in detail. In this study, we sought to determine bisoprolol's effect on left ventricle diastolic function. Data from 25 patients were statistically analyzed. Peaks E and A wave, E/A ratio, isovolumetric relaxation time and E wave deceleration time were measured echocardiographically. Doppler echocardiography measurements after bisoprolol treatment revealed an improvement in LV diastolic function. In conclusion, our results show that treatment with bisoprolol, improves echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic function after 3 months of treatment.

The HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) Study and its consequences

The HOPE study was a 19 country, prospective randomized trial in which the ACE-inhibitor Ramipril but not Vitamin E significantly reduced the risk of future cardiovascular events in a high-risk population of men and women, including many with diabetes. The benefits were present in all sub-groups, independent of the presence or absence of diabetes, hypertension, evidence of cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria, blood pressure lowering, the use of aspirin, lipid-lowering or antihypertensive medication. It provided clear evidence that Ramipril should safely and cost-effectively be used in individuals not known to have low ventricular ejection fraction or heart failure but at high-risk of cardiovascular events. It was also beneficial in patients with renal insufficiency, reducing progression of proteinuria and development of new microalbuminuria. It provided micro- and macrovascular benefits in people with diabetes, reduced the development of new cases of diabetes and showed a positive and graded association between the waist-to-hip ratio and the risk of developing diabetes. Sub-studies completed and on-going into the predictive role of natriuretic peptides, infectious and inflammatory markers, provide insight into possible mechanisms of action of Ramipril.

Hypertensive heart disease

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction (CHF-D) are the early manifestations of cardiovascular target organ damage in patients with arterial hypertension and signify hypertensive heart disease. Identification of hypertensive heart disease is critical, as these individuals are more prone to congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. Regression of left ventricular (LV) mass with antihypertensive therapy decreases the risk of future cardiovascular events. The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to both lower blood pressure (BP) and interrupt BP-independent pathophysiologic processes that promote LVH and CHF-D. The purpose of this review is to summarize current and emerging approaches to the pathophysiology and treatment of hypertensive heart disease.

Antihypertensive treatment: should it be titrated to blood pressure reduction or to target organ damage regression?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The success of an antihypertensive treatment is difficult to estimate by the extent of blood pressure reduction alone. Above and beyond blood pressure values in an individual patient, it is necessary to monitor the impact of antihypertensive treatment on the development or regression of hypertension-induced early end-organ damage. The intermediate objectives or surrogate endpoints may provide additional valuable information about the level of success of a given therapy in a particular patient. Moreover, monitoring intermediate objectives may provide scientific evidence for delineating the best antihypertensive treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The importance of assessing left ventricular mass, microalbuminuria, carotid wall thickness and the development of new-onset diabetes during antihypertensive treatment has been stressed. Left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive therapy is associated with a lower likelihood of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, independent of blood pressure lowering and treatment modalities in people with essential hypertension. Likewise, a reduction in urinary albumin excretion seems to be followed by a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Risk implications of reducing carotid wall thickness or of developing new-onset diabetes have been more controversial, although it seems to be that both can have a desirable effect.

SUMMARY

The available findings support the necessity to monitor intermediate objectives, aside from blood pressure measurement, during the follow-up of hypertensives.

Optimizing hypertension and vascular health: focus on ethnicity

Black individuals are at significantly higher risk for hypertension and its sequelae, including end-stage renal disease and congestive heart failure, compared with other ethnic groups. The reason for this increased risk is likely multifactorial: although genetic differences may play a partial role in the etiology and pathophysiology of hypertension in black patients, factors related to lifestyle, most notably high body mass index, appear to have a greater impact. The treatment approach to lowering blood pressure in blacks is the same as for other ethnic groups. Patients should be aggressively managed, using combination therapies in the majority of them to achieve optimal blood pressure control and thereby cardiorenal protection. Although blockers of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) appear to be less effective for lowering blood pressure and preventing kidney disease in blacks compared with whites, black patients have been underrepresented in studies of RAS blockers. Calcium channel blockers are distinctive for their potent blood pressure-lowering effects, and novel strategies such as chronotherapeutic dosing of these agents has further improved upon the flexibility of their use.

Effects of valsartan and perindopril combination therapy on left ventricular hypertrophy and aortic arterial stiffness in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of combined therapy of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB; valsartan) and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI; perindopril) on blood pressure (BP), metabolic profiles, plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, echocardiographic findings, and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) with those of respective monotherapy in never-treated patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized trial, in which there were 31 patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) who visited the outpatient clinic of Oita Red Cross Hospital (14 women and 17 men; mean+/-SD age, 59+/-5 years). Each patient was randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/day, V group, n=10), perindopril (8 mg/day, P group, n=11), or a combination of valsartan (80 mg/day) and perindopril (4 mg/day, V+P group, n=10) for 40 weeks. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), echocardiographic findings, metabolic findings, plasma BNP levels, and brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV) were evaluated before and after the 40-week therapy.

RESULTS

The baseline and post-therapeutic BP levels were similar among the three groups. At baseline ABPM, non-dipping was observed in 80, 82, and 80% in the V, P, and V+P groups, respectively. Each 40-week therapy regimen comparably reduced ABP. The plasma BNP levels (P<0.0001 for each), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (P<0.01 for each), and PWV values (P<0.0001 for each) were also reduced. However, when compared with either V or P group, the percentage reduction in LVMI (P<0.05 and P<0.005, respectively), BNP (P<0.05 for each), and baPWV values (P<0.005 and P<0.001, respectively) was greater in the V+P group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that, when compared with each monotherapy, perindopril and valsartan combination therapy exerts greater beneficial effects regarding the regression of LVH, reduction in BNP, and improvement of PWV in a selected group of essential hypertensive patients with LVH and high prevalence of non-dipping patterns.

Ramipril/Felodipine Extended-Release Fixed-Dose Combination

Ramipril/felodipine extended release (ER) [Triapin and Triapin Mite, Unimax] is a once-daily fixed-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor ramipril and the ER formulation of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist felodipine. It is indicated in adult patients with essential hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) is inadequately controlled with ramipril or felodipine monotherapy. In this patient population, commercially available fixed-dose combinations (i.e. 2.5 mg/2.5 mg and 5 mg/5 mg) of ramipril and felodipine ER are more effective at controlling hypertension than the individual components used as monotherapy at the same dosages. Likewise, the 5 mg/5 mg combination is as effective as felodipine ER 10 mg, and more effective than ramipril 10 mg administered as monotherapy. The addition of low-dose ramipril plus felodipine ER (fixed-dose or combination of individual components) to the existing antihypertensive regimen also appears to provide adequate BP control and renal protection in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease. In these patients, the low-dose combination of ramipril and felodipine ER was as effective as standard-dose felodipine ER, but more effective than standard-dose ramipril, in providing diastolic BP (DBP) control, and as effective as standard-dose ramipril, but more effective than standard-dose felodipine ER, in slowing the rate of regression of glomerular filtration. The ramipril/felodipine ER combination is as well tolerated as ramipril or felodipine ER monotherapy administered at the same dosages, and is better tolerated than felodipine ER monotherapy given at twice the dosage used in the combination. Overall, ramipril/felodipine ER appears to be an effective option for the treatment of adults with essential hypertension that is poorly controlled with monotherapy. In addition, a fixed, low-dose combination of ramipril/felodipine ER is a potential alternative to monotherapy for the initial management of essential hypertension.

Dose response of ACE inhibitors: implications of the SECURE trial

The choice of the appropriate dosage of ACE inhibitor in clinical practice is an important one. The available evidence suggests that in chronic heart failure as well as in chronic coronary artery disease, high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor are more effective than low ones. The current recommended clinical approach is to target ACE inhibitor dosing regimens to be similar to those used in the clinical trials, which demonstrated mortality and morbidity benefits. When titrated appropriately, ACE inhibitors are generally well tolerated and target doses can be achieved and maintained in the majority of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, with or without heart failure.